Next Article in Journal
Male-Specific Sequence in Populus simonii Provides Insights into Gender Determination of Poplar
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Real-Time PCR Assay for the Early Detection of the Eucalyptus Pathogen Quambalaria eucalypti
Previous Article in Journal
Towards the Conservation of Monumental Taxus baccata L. Trees of Thasos Island: Genetic Insights
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Infestation by Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872), Its Associated Fungi, and Butt Rots in Stands of Pinus sibirica in South-Western Siberia

1
Independent Researcher, Private P.O. Box, Karaulnaya St. 38–222, 660043 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
2
Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7026, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
3
Independent Researcher, Private P.O. Box, Karaulnaya St. 43/2-212, 660020 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
4
Independent Researcher, Private P.O. Box, Parashutnaya St. 11A–28, 660121 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(12), 2383; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122383
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 26 November 2023 / Accepted: 30 November 2023 / Published: 6 December 2023

Abstract

:
In 2019, the bark beetle Ips amitinus (native to central Europe) was identified in south-western Siberia at a distance exceeding 2500 km east of its previously known easternmost location in the European part of Russia. In Siberia, its invasive populations are characterised by high abundance and harmfulness. Here, I. amitinus accomplishes primary attacks on standing vital trees of Pinus sibirica with a lethal outcome. This invasion has already resulted in massive dieback in stands of pine over a large geographic territory. By, 2021, the invaded area was estimated to cover at least 31,200 km2. The objectives of this study were to investigate fungi associated with/vectored by I. amitinus in its invasive area in south-western Siberia and wood decay fungi that cause root and butt rots to P. sibirica. This led to the following conclusions: (i) DNA analysis of sixty adult beetles of Ips amitinus collected from P. sibirica in south-west Siberia revealed the presence of 143 fungal taxa; (ii) species richness was significantly higher in beetles collected from dead branches than from (more recently infested) dying branches; (iii) fungal communities were >90% dominated by yeasts, among which the most common were Nakazawaea holstii, Kuraishia molischiana, and N. ambrosiae; (iv) entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana s.l. was the most common fungus isolated from dead/mycosed beetles of I. amitinus, followed by Lophium arboricola and four Ophiostoma spp.; and (v) Heterobasidion parviporum was the most common decay fungus detected, which was causing heart rot in stems of P. sibirica.

1. Introduction

The small spruce bark beetle, Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) is a European species native to the middle latitudes of the continent, from the utmost west (the Netherlands) to the east (Turkey) [1,2]. In its native range, the beetle colonises dying and suppressed coniferous trees, primarily Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.), thus being a secondary pest of insignificant economic importance [3,4,5]. In 2019, I. amitinus was identified in south-western Siberia, in the Tomsk and Kemerovo regions [6], at a distance exceeding 2500 km east of its previously known easternmost location in the European part of Russia [5]. The proximity of the finding to the Trans-Siberian Railway provides a strong indication that the pathway for the invasion has been the long-distance transportation of wood [2].
Notably, in the newly invaded areas of south-western Siberia, the beetle almost exclusively colonises a new host, Siberian pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) [7], while being only occasionally observed on adjacent trees of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) [6]. Yet, the latter is a subspecies of Norway spruce [8], which is otherwise the preferred host of I. amitinus at its native range in Europe [3,4]. Apparently, at the invasive range the host preference of I. amitinus has changed. A similar observation has been previously reported for mountain bark beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae, Hopkins 1902) in North America, where the beetle, upon expanding its invasive range, switched from “historical” to “novel” hosts in new territories [9,10].
Moreover, on the “novel” host (Siberian pine) in the invasive range, I. amitinus exhibits strikingly different behaviour to that observed on its “historical” host (Norway spruce) in the native range. In Siberia, its invasive populations are characterised by high abundance and harmfulness [7]. By contrast, here I. amitinus accomplishes primary attacks on standing vital trees with a lethal outcome. From the start, it colonises the upper part of the trunk with thin bark and the branches. During the first year, the upper crown dies off, while the lower branches remain green; in the second year, the whole tree dies [6]. Consequently, the invasion has already resulted in a massive dieback of P. sibirica stands over a large geographic territory. By 2021, the invaded area was estimated to cover at least 31,200 km2 [7]. The native range of Siberian pine covers an immense area of over 400,000 km2, stretching from north-west Ural to south-east Altai [11]; thus, apparently up to 10% of its whole area has already been infested by I. amitinus. The invasion is expanding farther at “dramatic rates” and could be deemed an ongoing “natural catastrophe” [5,7].
Bark beetles are known to be associated with numerous fungi representing a wide range of taxonomic, functional, and ecological groups, and I. amitinus in this respect is not an exception. Yet, published papers on fungal associates of I. amitinus are relatively few, targeting beetles collected almost exclusively from its preferred host, Norway spruce, at the native range in central Europe. Moreover, the studies focused either on ophiostomatoid [12,13,14] or entomopathogenic [15,16,17,18] fungi, and each of the cited studies was based on pure culture isolations. However, isolations of fungi from environmental samples (e.g., beetles) are biased towards in vitro fast-growing species, thus are unlikely to reveal the whole spectrum of the fungi. To a certain extent, this can be resolved by the direct analysis of fungal DNA from an insect. Direct sequencing of fungal DNA from environmental samples has proved to be a sensitive method for the detection of potentially all fungi, in particular species that are usually overlooked by isolation, including latent pathogens, slow-growing endophytes, and unculturable species [19].
Another group of fungi, namely, root and butt rot pathogens, is known to be important in predisposing trees to bark beetle attacks. Thus, Lewis and Lindgren [20] reviewed the results from thirteen North American studies, showing that infections by rot-causing fungi such as Armillaria, Heterobasidion, Inonotus, or Phellinus increased the vulnerability of a wide range of conifers (Abies, Picea, Pinus, Pseudotsuga) to attacks by several species of bark beetles (e.g., Dendroctonus, Scolytus). Moreover, another North American study has demonstrated that Armillaria-infected pine was more prone to attacks by Dendroctonus and Pityogenes [21]. On the other hand, in this respect different results were reported from Europe, where in Picea abies stands no correlations were found between the attacks by Ips typographus L. and the incidence of butt rot caused either by Armillaria [22] or Heterobasidion [23].
To date, the information regarding the causal agents of root and butt rots of Pinus sibirica accessible to the international reader is very limited. This is not surprising as the native range of this pine is almost exclusively (99%) confined within Russian Siberia, and only 1% of the total area of its forests is found on the territory of Mongolia [11]. To date, only a single review is available, in which root and butt rots caused by Armillaria and Heterobasidion were reported to play important roles in the massive dieback of Pinus sibirica in the Sayan Mountains, south Siberia [24]. In the literature published in Russian, more extensive data are available on rot-causing fungi colonising Siberian pine. Using the sporocarp inventory of thousands of uprooted, broken, living trees and stumps, it was found that the most common fungi causing wood rot (apart from Armillaria and Heterobasidion) belong to the genera Coniophora, Serpula, Postia (Oligoporus), Phaeolus, Porodeadalia, Lentinus, and Fomitopsis [25]. However, on living trees sporocarps of those fungi are seldom produced. For example, in the cited study only up to 7% of approx. 3000 examined living trees showed sporocarps of Coniophora spp., and those fungi were the species most often observed.
Knowledge related to the invasion of I. amitinus and its associated fungi into the new geographic range in Siberia, as well as on decay fungi colonising living trees of Siberian pine, is relevant not only from the point of view of forest health and ecology, but also from the point of view of potential/eventual exports of the infested roundwood to China. The exports, therefore, would clearly involve a risk of the farther long-distance spread of the invasive organisms, both the beetle and its associated fungi. The objectives of this study were to investigate fungi associated with/vectored by I. amitinus in its invasive area in south-western Siberia and wood decay fungi that cause root and butt rots to P. sibirica.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Collecting Beetles

Four study sites were located in Tomsk Region, south-western Siberia (Figure 1), representing 120–160-year-old stands of Pinus sibirica subjected to attacks by Ips amitinus. On the sites, since 2019 approx. 25%–40% of trees have been attacked or killed, or are dying. In the forest cover, share in species composition of P. sibirica comprised 70%–100%, with an admixture of Abies sibirica Ledeb., Picea obovata, Pinus sylvestris L., Populus tremula L., and Betula pendula Roth. In the undergrowth, the dominating species were Padus avium Mill., Sorbus sibirica Hedl., and Rubus idaeus L., and the groundcover was mostly composed of Carex macroura Meinsh., Calamagrostis obtusata Trin., and Oxalis acetosella L.
Beetles of Ips amitinus were collected from a total of six standing trees of Pinus sibirica. Sampling was carried out on 11–14 July 2021 from two trees at site A, two at B, one at C, and one at D. The geographic coordinates of the sites and condition of the examined trees are presented in Table 1. The age of the trees varied between 120 and 160 years, height between 24 and 27 m, and the stem diameter at approx. 1.3 m height (DHB) between 38 and 46 cm. Four of these trees (A1, B1, C1, D1) had been dead and infested for approx. 1–2 years. The crown of each tree was 100% dead, and the upper part partly defoliated (Figure 2). Sampled branches were located at the lower part of the crowns, apparently attacked by the beetle during the previous vegetation season. The branches retained brown foliage and showed entrance holes on the bark. Two other sample trees (A2, B2) were living, but classified as “dying”. The trees exhibited crown discoloration and occasional occurrence of dead twigs/branches at the upper part of the crowns, so-called “crown top dieback” [7]. Branches sampled from those trees showed foliage discoloration and the entrance holes of the beetle.
The beetles were collected from attacked branches in the crowns at the height of 18–20 m. This included climbing up to a crown (by a professional climber), then selecting a skeletal branch (diameter at the base: 8–10 cm) with symptoms of Ips amitinus attack, tying the branch up with a rope, cutting it off the stem, and bringing it down to the ground. After removing the bark from the section of the branch with the entry holes, five to seven galleries were sampled per branch. The insects were collected using sterilised forceps.
For subsequent molecular analyses of the fungal community (see Section 2.2), ten living beetles from each tree were pooled and placed into separate 1.5 mL centrifugation tubes (one tube per tree, six in total). For pure culture isolations of the fungi (Section 2.4), ten dead (mycosed) beetles per tree were collected. These were placed into individual tubes (one per tube, sixty in total). Upon sampling in the field, the tubes were placed into an icebox and transferred to the laboratory. Tubes with the beetles designated for DNA analysis were stored at −20 °C and beetles for fungal culturing at −4 °C.

2.2. DNA Isolation, PCR Amplification, Sequencing, and Bioinformatics

A total of six samples, representing each tree, were used for isolation of DNA. The procedures of the subsequent work with the DNA and the bioinformatic analyses were similar to those conducted in our previous study [26]. Amplification of ITS2 rDNA region was performed using the fungal-specific primer gITS7 [27] and universal primer ITS4 [28], both containing sample identification barcodes.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Rarefaction analysis was carried out using Analytical Rarefaction v.1.3, (http://www.uga.edu/strata/software/index.html, accessed on 1 September 2023). The difference in richness of fungal taxa on Ips amitinus from dead and dying trees was compared using the non-parametric chi-square test [29]. Fungal community composition was analysed using the Shannon diversity index, Sørensen qualitative similarity index, and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on the Bray–Curtis similarity index in Canocco v.5.12 [30,31].

2.4. Isolation and Molecular Identification of Fungal Cultures

Isolations from beetles (60 in total, each collected dead) were carried out within less than seven days after collection. The beetles were sterilised in 75% ethanol for 45 s, washed (rinsed three times) in sterile water, and dried in between two sterile paper filters. The isolations were carried out on malt-extract agar (MEA) and on MEA + 0.5% tannin media in Petri dishes by placing and slightly inserting each beetle into the medium using sterilised forceps. The dishes were incubated at +24 °C in the dark and checked daily for fungal growth. Outgrowing morphologically distinct mycelia (Figure 3a) were sub-cultured on separate dishes containing MEA, microscopically examined (Nikon Eclipse Ci microscope, Japan), and grouped according to mycelial morphotype.
For isolations from the wood, all six trees were sampled by inserting an increment borer approx. 10 cm deep into the stem at two different heights: 0.2 m and 1.2 m. In addition, at each of the four sites, five dying trees, all attacked by Ips amitinus, were sampled in a similar manner. Thus, in total, wood cores were obtained from a total of twenty-six trees and at two different stem heights. Each core was individually placed into a sterile 15 mL centrifugation tube. In the laboratory, these were extracted from the tubes using sterile forceps (surface sterilised under a flame), placed into Petri dishes with MEA media (Figure 3b), and processed further as described for the beetles above.
For species identification, representative cultures from each morphological morphotype were subjected to sequencing of ITS rDNA. Isolation of DNA, amplification, and sequencing followed the methods described by Menkis et al. [32]. Amplification by PCR was performed using primers ITS1F [33] and ITS4 [28]. The GenBank database was used to determine the identity of the ITS rDNA sequences. The criteria used for identification were sequence coverage of >80%, similarity to species level of 98%–100%, and similarity to genus level of 94%–97%. Generated sequences were deposited in GenBank.

3. Results

A total of 9422 high-quality ITS2 rDNA sequences were generated by PacBio sequencing, representing 143 fungal taxa. The number of fungal taxa was higher in beetles collected from “dead” trees/branches than from the “dying” trees/branches (Table 1). This difference was statistically significant. For both datasets, plotting the fungal taxa vs. the cumulative number of sequences resulted in rarefaction curves that approached asymptotes (Figure 4).
In the NMDS analysis, fungal communities derived from beetles collected on adjacent sites/trees (A and B) were ordinated closer together (Figure 5). In these communities, the highest Sørensen similarity index values (0.40–0.51) were also detected (Table 2). In the beetle samples collected from all trees, the Shannon diversity index varied between 1.3 and 1.6, except for D1, where it was 2.7 (Table 1).
Table 3 presents the list of the most common and some of the more conspicuous fungal taxa that were detected during the study. The presented taxonomy should be taken with a certain reservation, as it is based only on short ITS2 rDNA sequences. Nevertheless, Table 3 should be considered informative, as GenBank sequence references, bp similarities, and source descriptions are also provided. The latter as a rule refer to the associations of a given fungus with the bark beetle or its activity, as well as the geographic location of the finding. The last rows under “Some other identified wood- and bark-inhabiting fungi (lichens)” might be of interest from the mycological point of view. As evident from Table 3, the prevailing majority of detected taxa (92.9%) comprised “Bark-beetle-associated yeasts”. Among these, the most common were Nakazawaea holstii (59.0%), Kuraishia molischiana (13.0%), and Nakazawaea ambrosiae (10.1%). In total, these three species comprised 82.1% of the community. The proportion of ophiostomatoid fungi was 2.0%.
Pure culture isolations from the beetles yielded a total of 33 isolates representing nine taxa (Table 4). The taxa are presented sensu lato as a single ITS marker has been used that cannot discriminate the species in more detail, in particular for ophiostomatoids. The most commonly isolated fungus was Beauveria bassiana, represented by 15 isolates, thus comprising 45.5% of all isolates and detected in 25.0% of the beetles subjected to isolations. Ophiostoma canum and Lophium arboricola followed, each represented by four isolates, corresponding to 12.1% of all isolates and 6.7% of the beetles, respectively. Lophium arboricola was also detected in the beetles by direct sequencing, as this was also the case for Ophiostoma bicolor and O. hongxingense (Table 3).
Each stem subjected to sampling for pure culture isolations from wood was visually sound or, in other words, not exhibiting any external symptoms of rot. In total, fungi were isolated from 21 out of 26 sampled stems (81.0%). The isolations yielded a total of 29 pure culture isolates representing five wood-decaying basidiomycete species. In Table 5, they are listed in order of frequency of occurrence. The most common was Heterobasidion parviporum, detected in twelve (46.2%) of the examined stems and comprising 41.4% of all isolates. The fungus was found exclusively at a stem height of 0.2 m, and not at 1.2 m. In four stems (15.4% of samples), the fungi were detected at a height of 1.2 m, and these were Fomitopsis pinicola and Porodaedalea pini (Table 5).

4. Discussion

In this study, sixty I. amitinus beetles collected from six trees at four localities yielded 143 fungal taxa. Despite the relatively high richness of the taxa, the detected overall diversity of taxa was low. This was demonstrated by the low values of the Shannon diversity index observed in five trees (excluding D1). The latter implies that the evenness of taxa distribution in the communities was low, indicating that the communities were dominated by a single taxon or a few taxa. This indeed was the case, as the share of just three taxa of yeast, Nakazawaea holstii, Kuraishia molischiana, and Nakazawaea ambrosiae, comprised over 80% of the community. Notably, the richness of taxa was significantly higher in dead than in dying branches, which can be explained by the longer time span since the beetle attack, thus a longer exposure of dead woody substrate to the secondary colonisers. The similarities between the fungal communities were greater among samples collected from the four trees at adjacent sites (A and B). This is somewhat surprising, as those trees differed in their condition (dead and dying), thus exhibited significant differences in taxa richness (high and low, respectively).
Previous studies using ITS2 rDNA as a marker had also revealed common associations of those yeasts with conifer bark beetles from the genus Ips, yet within their native range in Europe. Thus, Nakazawaea was the most frequently identified yeast in the gut of I. acuminatus (Gyllenhal, 1827) infesting pine, and Kuraishia in the gut of I. cembrae (Heer, 1836) infesting larch [37]. Interestingly, the taxon of Nakazawaea holstii has also been detected in the uncolonised phloem of pine in the vicinity of larval galleries in stems infested by the pine shoot beetle Tomicus piniperda (Linnaeus, 1758) [38]. Lou et al. [34] presented an extensive review of the possible roles of the yeast associates in bark beetle biology. According to the references provided in [34], certain yeasts may contribute to bark beetle development or fecundity, interact with filamentous fungi, affect the phytochemicals of tree tissues, counteract host plant defence, be involved in bark beetle chemical communication, and attract bark beetle enemies. More specifically, regarding the taxa of yeasts detected during the present study (Nakazawaea, Kuraishia, Ogataea), the following information is provided on their ecological and biological functions: they assimilate nitrate, assimilate cellobiose and D-xylose, covert verbenol to verbenone, enhance the attractiveness of a mixture of attractants for the bark beetle, and affect fungal growth [34].
Four ophiostomatoid taxa were occasionally (and regularly) detected by sequencing of ITS2 rDNA. Although the precise species identification here is not possible, it is obvious that each of the fungi has certain associations with bark beetles and conifers in Asia, Europe, and North America. Similarly, four taxa (in this case species sensu lato) were detected by pure culture isolations and ITS rDNA sequencing, and two of these, Ophiostoma bicolor s.l. and O. hongxingense s.l., were also detected by ITS2 rDNA sequencing. O. bicolor s.l. has been previously reported as an associate of I. amitinus on Picea abies in Europe [12,13,14]. Yet, the most common fungus isolated was the entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana s.l. Using a similar methodological approach, the fungus was exclusively detected in mycosed I. amitinus beetles in its native range in central Europe (Slovakia) [18]. By contrast, in studies in which the insect body was dissected and its internal organs inspected using a light microscope, B. bassiana has not been detected; instead, the genera of entomopathogens such as the ascomycete Metschnikovia, sporozoan Gregarina, zygomycete Chytridiopsis [15,16,39], and fungi-related spore-forming unicellular parasite Microsporidium [17] have been reported. Among more conspicuous fungi, it is worth mentioning the wood-inhabiting ascomycete Lophium arboricola that was detected using both methods: pure culture isolations from the surface of sterilised dead beetles and sequencing directly from their bodies.
Given that for the fungal isolations from the wood I. amitinus-attacked trees were exclusively sampled, the study was not designed to investigate the impact of root and butt rot on beetle attack. Nevertheless, despite the relatively small sample size, the data are of interest, as this study presents for the first time information on the occurrence of root and butt rot fungi in sound-looking stems of Pinus sibirica, and is the first of its kind in the whole of Siberia. The handful of previous related studies in this immense geographic area were limited to observations of trees, exhibiting externally visible symptoms such as sporocarps/rhizomorphs [24,25]. In this study, the five species of fungi detected are common root-, butt-, and stem-rot-causing basidiomycetes, well presented in textbooks on forest pathology. It must be noted that all these fungi must have been present in the investigated stems for years (most likely for decades) prior to the invasion of the beetle.
The most common fungus isolated from the wood was the rot-causing pathogen Heterobasidion parviporum. It belongs to the Heterobasidion species complex known to cause “the most economically important diseases of conifers in Northern Hemisphaere” [40]. The finding of H. parviporum on pine is surprising, as the species is known to be “relatively strictly specialized” for spruce [41]. On the other hand, this can be explained by the fact that the investigated sites were characterised by an admixture of spruce (Section 2.1), and all were situated in the vicinity of a village. In Siberia, on such sites the selective harvesting of spruce and preservation of pine is a usual practice [11].
Thus, it is likely that cut spruce stumps created a pathway for primary infections of H. parviporum to the root systems. Subsequently, the pathogen apparently accomplished secondary infections in adjacent pines via root contacts. In general, in species characterised by a resinous heartwood, such as (European and North American) species of pine, Heterobasidion attacks sapwood, often causing mortality [41]. Therefore, another unexpected outcome of the study was the observation of H. parviporum as the causal agent of extensive heart rot at the butt of Pinus sibirica (Figure 6).
Phaeolus schweinitzii and Porodaedalea pini are typical attributes of temperate and boreal old-growth conifer forests of Eurasia and North America, where they cause decay in living stems but also continue to develop on dead wood following tree death [42,43]. In Europe, they are regarded as indicator species for forests of high value for nature conservation [44]. Fomitopsis pinicola is primarily known as a common and widespread decomposer of dead wood of a broad range of woody species, yet in old natural conifer forests it occurs in living stems and is known as a mortality agent in pristine forests of northern Eurasia [45]. Armillaria is an opportunistic root pathogen that normally colonises dead woody substrates (both by airborne basidiospores and soilborne rhizomorphs) but is also able to attack and to cause massive mortality to weakened/stressed trees [46]; as a group of species, it has been described as “definitely the most studied fungus in the world” [47].

5. Conclusions

The present study led to the following conclusions: (i) DNA analysis of sixty adult beetles of Ips amitinus collected from Pinus sibirica in south-western Siberia revealed the presence of 143 fungal taxa; (ii) the species richness was significantly higher in beetles collected from dead branches than from (more recently infested) dying branches; (iii) fungal communities were >90% dominated by yeasts, among which the most common were Nakazawaea holstii, Kuraishia molischiana, and N. ambrosiae; (iv) entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana s.l. was the most common fungus isolated from dead/mycosed beetles of I. amitinus, followed by Lophium arboricola and four Ophiostoma spp.; and (v) Heterobasidion parviporum was the most common decay fungus detected, which was causing heart rot in stems of Pinus sibirica.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, I.N.P., R.V. and A.M.; methodology, A.M., I.N.P., Y.A.L. and R.V.; validation, I.N.P., A.M. and R.V.; investigation and formal analysis, I.N.P., Y.A.L., A.A.T., A.M. and R.V.; visualisation, A.M. and I.N.P.; writing—original draft preparation, R.V., I.N.P. and A.M.; supervision and project administration, I.N.P., R.V. and A.M.; funding acquisition, I.N.P., R.V. and A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research of R.V. and A.M. was supported by the Faculty of Forestry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SLU Forest Damage Centre, and the Swedish Research Council Formas (project no. 2019-00597).

Data Availability Statement

Fungal ITS rDNA sequences generated during this study have been submitted to the GenBank database, and their accession numbers are provided in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5.

Acknowledgments

The picture in Figure 2 was produced by S.S. Kulakov.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Knížek, M. Curculionidae: Scolytinae. In Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera; Löbl, I., Smetana, A., Eds.; Apollo Books: Stenstrup, Denmark, 2011; Volume 7, Curculionidae I; pp. 86–88, 204–251. [Google Scholar]
  2. Musolin, D.L.; Kirichenko, N.I.; Karpun, N.N.; Aksenenko, E.V.; Golub, V.B.; Kerchev, I.A.; Mandelshtam, M.Y.; Vasaitis, R.; Volkovitsh, M.G.; Zhuravleva, E.N.; et al. Invasive insect pests of forests and urban trees in Russia: Origin, pathways, damage, and management. Forests 2022, 13, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pfeffer, A. Zentral- und Westpaläarktishe Borken- und Kernkäfer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae). Entomol. Basiliensia 1994, 17, 5–310. [Google Scholar]
  4. Økland, B.; Flø, D.; Schroeder, M.; Zach, P.; Cocos, D.; Martikainen, P.; Siitonen, J.; Mandelshtam, M.Y.; Musolin, D.L.; Neuvonen, S.; et al. Range expansion of the small spruce bark beetle Ips amitinus: A newcomer in northern Europe. Agric. For. Entomol. 2019, 21, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kerchev, I.A.; Krivets, S.A. An attack of Ips amitinus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae: Scolytinae) on arboretum in West Siberia: New host of invasive bark beetle among exotic conifers. J. Asia–Pac. Entomol. 2021, 24, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kerchev, I.A.; Mandelshtam, M.Y.; Krivets, S.A.; Ilinsky, Y.Y. Small spruce bark beetle Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae: Scolytinae): A new alien species West Siberia. Entomol. Rev. 2019, 99, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kerchev, I.A.; Krivets, S.A.; Bisirova, E.M.; Smirnov, N.A. Distribution of the small spruce bark beetle Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Western Siberia. Russ. J. Biol. Invasions 2022, 13, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krutovskii, K.V.; Bergmann, F. Introgressive hybridization and phylogenetic relationships between Norway, Picea abies (L.) Karst., and Siberian, P. obovata Ledeb., spruce species studied by isozyme loci. Heredity 1995, 74, 464–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Erbilgin, N.; Ma, C.; Whitehouse, C.; Shan, B.; Najar, A.; Evenden, M. Chemical similarity between historical and novel host plants promotes range and host expansion of the mountain pine beetle in a naive host ecosystem. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 940–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosenberger, D.W.; Venette, R.C.; Maddox, M.P.; Aukema, B.H. Colonization behaviors of mountain pine beetle on novel hosts: Implications for range expansion into northeastern North America. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bekh, I.A.; Danchenko, A.M.; Kibish, I.V. Sosna Kedrovaya Sibirskaya: Sibirskoe Chudo-derevo (Siberian Stone Pine: A Siberian Wonder Tree); Tomsk Gosudarstvennyi Universitet: Tomsk, Russia, 2004. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirisits, T. Fungal associates of European bark beetles with special emphasis on the Ophiostomatoid fungi. In Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis; Lieutier, F., Day, K.R., Battisti, A., Grégoire, J.-C., Evans, H.F., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 181–236. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jankowiak, R.; Kacprzyk, M.; Mlynarczik, M. Diversity of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) colonizing branches of Norway spruce (Picea abies) in southern Poland. Biologia 2009, 64, 1170–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Repe, A.; Kirisits, T.; Piskur, B.; de Groot, M.; Kump, B.; Jurc, M. Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with three spruce-infesting bark beetles in Slovenia. Ann. For. Sci. 2013, 70, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lukasova, K.; Holusa, J.; Turcani, M. Pathogens of Ips amitinus: New species and comparison with Ips typographus. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wegensteiner, R.; Stradner, A.; Handel, U. Occurrence of pathogens in Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and in other spruce bark beetles from the wilderness reserve Durrenstein (Lower Austria). Biologia 2014, 69, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Holusa, J.; Lukasova, K.; Zizka, Z.; Handel, U.; Haidler, B.; Wegensteiner, R. Occurrence of Microsporidium sp. and other pathogens in Ips amitinus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Acta Patasitol. 2016, 61, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hyblerova, S.; Medo, J.; Barta, M. Diversity and prevalence of entomopathogenic fungi (Ascomycota, Hypocreales) in epidemic populations of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolitynae) in spruce forests of the Tatra National Park in Slovakia. Ann. For. Res. 2021, 64, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kernaghan, G.; Sigler, L.; Khasa, D. Mycorrhizal and root endophytic fungi of containerized Picea glauca seedlings assessed by rDNA sequence analysis. Microb. Ecol. 2003, 45, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lewis, K.W.; Lindgren, S. Relationship between spruce beetle and tomentosus root disease: Two natural disturbance agents of spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 2002, 32, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kulhavy, D.L.; Partridge, A.D.; Stark, R.W. Root diseases and blister rust associated with bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Western White pine in Idaho. Environ. Entomol. 1984, 13, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jankovsky, L.; Cudlin, P.; Moravec, I. Root decays as a potential predisposition factor of a bark beetle disaster in the Sumava Mts. J. For. Sci. 2003, 49, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Christiansen, E.; Huse, K.J. Infestation ability of Ips typographus L. in Norway spruce in relation to butt rot, tree vitality and increment. Nor. Skogforsk. 1980, 35, 473–482. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pavlov, I.N. Biotic and abiotic factors as causes of coniferous forests dieback in Siberia and Far East. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2015, 8, 440–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arefyev, S.P. Xylotrophic fungi—The causal agents of Siberian pine (Pinus sibirica du Tour) rot in the central taiga Irtish river basin. Mikol. I Fitopatol. 1991, 25, 419–425. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Menkis, A.; Östbrant, I.-L.; Davydenko, K.; Bakys, R.; Balalaikins, M.; Vasaitis, R. Scolytus multistriatus associated with Dutch elm disease on the island of Gotland: Phenology and communities of vectored fungi. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ihrmark, K.; Bödeker, I.T.M.; Cruz-Martinez, K.; Friberg, H.; Kubartova, A.; Schenck, J.; Strid, Y.; Stenlid, J.; Brandstrom-Durling, M.; Clemmensen, K.E.; et al. New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region—Evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 82, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylo-genetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fowler, J.; Cohen, L.; Jarvis, P. Practical Statistics for Field Biology; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  30. Magurran, A.E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  31. ter Braak, C.J.F.; Smilauer, P. Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination, Version 4; Microcomputer Power: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  32. Menkis, A.; Vasaitis, R.; Taylor, A.F.S.; Stenström, E.; Stenlid, J.; Finlay, R. Fungi in decayed roots of conifer seedlings in forest nurseries, afforested clear-cuts and abandoned farmland. Plant Pathol. 2006, 55, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lou, Q.-Z.; Lu, M.; Sun, J.-H. Yeast diversity associated with invasive Dendroctonus valens killing Pinus tabuliformis in China using culturing and molecular methods. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 68, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mercado, J.E.; Ortiz-Santana, B.; Kay, S.L. Endemic Jeffrey pine beetle associates: Beetle/mite fungal dissemination strategies and interactions that may influence beetle population levels. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hausner, G.; Iranpour, M.; Kim, J.-J.; Breuil, C.; Davis, C.N.; Gibb, E.A.; Reid, J.; Loewen, P.C.; Hopkin, A.A. Fungi vectored by the introduced bark beetle Tomicus piniperda in Ontario, Canada, and comments on the taxonomy of Leptographium lundbergii, Leptographium terebrantis, Leptographium truncatum, and Leptographium wingfieldii. Can. J. Bot. 2005, 83, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chakraborty, A.; Modlinger, R.; Ashraf, M.Z.; Synek, J.; Schlyter, F.; Roy, A. Core mycobiome and their ecological relevance in the gut of five Ips bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 568853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kluting, K.; Strid, Y.; Six, D.; Rosling, A. Forest fire influence on Tomicus piniperda—associated fungal communities and phloem nutrient availability of colonized Pinus sylvestris. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 86, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weiser, J.; Wegensteiner, R.; Händel, U.; Zizka, Z. Infections with the Ascomycete fungus Metschnikowia typographi sp.nov. in the bark beetles Ips typographus and Ips amitinus (Coleoptera, Scolitydae). Folia Microbiol. 2003, 48, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Woodward, S.; Stenlid, J.; Karjalainen, R.; Huttermann, A. (Eds.) Heterobasidion Annosum, Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gonthier, P.; Thor, M. Annosus root and butt rots. In Infectious Forest Diseases; Gonthier, P., Nicolotti, G., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 128–158. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dai, Y.C.; Cui, B.K.; Yuan, H.S.; Li, B.D. Pathogenic wood-decaying fungi in China. For. Pathol. 2007, 37, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tomsovsky, M.; Sedlak, P.; Jankovsky, L. Species recognition and phylogenetic relationships of European Porodaedalea (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales). Mycol. Prog. 2010, 9, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nitare, J. Indicator Species for Assessing the Nature Conservation Value of Woodland Sites; Skogsstyrelsen: Jönköping, Sweden, 2000. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
  45. Lannenpaa, A.; Aakala, T.; Kauhanen, H.; Kuuluvainen, T. Tree mortality agents in pristine Norway spruce forests in northern Fennoscandia. Silva Fenn. 2008, 42, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shaw, C.G.; Kile, G.A. (Eds.) Armillaria Root Disease; Agriculture Handbook No. 691; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  47. Guillaumin, J.-J.; Legrand, P. Armillaria root rots. In Infectious Forest Diseases; Gonthier, P., Nicolotti, G., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 159–177. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Map showing sampling sites denoted as A, B, C, and D. Map to the left was adapted from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_blank_map_(grey_%26_white).png (accessed on 7 September 2023). Map to the right was modified from Apple Maps (accessed on 7 September 2023).
Figure 1. Map showing sampling sites denoted as A, B, C, and D. Map to the left was adapted from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_blank_map_(grey_%26_white).png (accessed on 7 September 2023). Map to the right was modified from Apple Maps (accessed on 7 September 2023).
Forests 14 02383 g001
Figure 2. Pinus sibirica killed by Ips amitinus in south-western Siberia.
Figure 2. Pinus sibirica killed by Ips amitinus in south-western Siberia.
Forests 14 02383 g002
Figure 3. Pure culture isolations of fungi (a) from dead beetles of Ips amitinus; (b) from wood samples of Pinus sibirica.
Figure 3. Pure culture isolations of fungi (a) from dead beetles of Ips amitinus; (b) from wood samples of Pinus sibirica.
Forests 14 02383 g003
Figure 4. Rarefaction curves showing the relationship between the cumulative number of fungal taxa and the number of ITS2 rDNA sequences detected in Ips amitinus beetles collected from dying and dead Pinus sibirica trees/branches in south-western Siberia. The chi-square test showed that the richness of fungal taxa was significantly higher in Ips amitinus from dead trees/branches than from dying ones (p < 0.003).
Figure 4. Rarefaction curves showing the relationship between the cumulative number of fungal taxa and the number of ITS2 rDNA sequences detected in Ips amitinus beetles collected from dying and dead Pinus sibirica trees/branches in south-western Siberia. The chi-square test showed that the richness of fungal taxa was significantly higher in Ips amitinus from dead trees/branches than from dying ones (p < 0.003).
Forests 14 02383 g004
Figure 5. Ordination diagram based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling of fungal communities associated with Ips amitinus on Pinus sibirica at four different sites in south-western Siberia. The size of each plot shows the relative richness of fungal taxa. Letters correspond to sites as indicated in Figure 1.
Figure 5. Ordination diagram based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling of fungal communities associated with Ips amitinus on Pinus sibirica at four different sites in south-western Siberia. The size of each plot shows the relative richness of fungal taxa. Letters correspond to sites as indicated in Figure 1.
Forests 14 02383 g005
Figure 6. Heart rot caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in butt of Pinus sibirica.
Figure 6. Heart rot caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in butt of Pinus sibirica.
Forests 14 02383 g006
Table 1. Generated high-quality ITS2 rDNA sequences and detected diversity of fungal taxa associated with Ips amitinus on six Pinus sibirica trees at four sites in south-western Siberia. Letters correspond to sites as indicated in Figure 1.
Table 1. Generated high-quality ITS2 rDNA sequences and detected diversity of fungal taxa associated with Ips amitinus on six Pinus sibirica trees at four sites in south-western Siberia. Letters correspond to sites as indicated in Figure 1.
Site/TreeTree/Branch ConditionGeographic PositionSequences (No.)Taxa (No.)Shannon Diversity Index
A1dead56.3099, 85.17331445461.6
A2dying“–”1657321.3
B1dead56.3102, 85.13621466441.3
B2dying“–”1772261.3
C1dead56.5389, 84.73661483451.6
D1dead56.3855, 85.25991599682.7
All 9422143
Table 2. Similarities between fungal communities associated with Ips amitinus (the Sørensen qualitative similarity index) detected in different study sites (indicated by different letters, as in Figure 1). The index comparing the communities detected in beetles collected from trees on adjacent sites (A and B) is shown in bold.
Table 2. Similarities between fungal communities associated with Ips amitinus (the Sørensen qualitative similarity index) detected in different study sites (indicated by different letters, as in Figure 1). The index comparing the communities detected in beetles collected from trees on adjacent sites (A and B) is shown in bold.
Site/TreeA1B1C1D1A2B2
A1-0.480.400.200.510.41
B1 -0.350.270.430.40
C1 -0.360.380.27
D1 -0.210.20
A2 -0.45
B2 -
Table 3. Relative abundance of fungal taxa (% of all generated high-quality ITS2 rDNA sequences) detected in Ips amitinus beetles infesting Pinus sibirica in south-western Siberia.
Table 3. Relative abundance of fungal taxa (% of all generated high-quality ITS2 rDNA sequences) detected in Ips amitinus beetles infesting Pinus sibirica in south-western Siberia.
TaxonSequence ReferenceSimilarityGenBank SourceAbundance of Sequences, %
This StudyGenBankbp%DescriptionA1B1C1D1A2B2All
Bark-beetle-associated yeasts
Nakazawaea holstiiOM614738KY104368286/286100Frass on Picea rubens, Quebec (CBS:2091) a57.261.658.238.470.666.959.0
Kuraishia molischianaOM614742KY103921274/27699Rotten wood of Fagus sylvatica, Hungary a, b17.422.66.55.217.29.913.0
Nakazawaea ambrosiaeOM614743NR_165549295/29699Ips typographus gallery, Picea abies, Moscow13.07.818.57.54.69.810.1
Ogataea piniOM614767HQ413282280/28999Dendroctonus brevicomis, Pinus ponderosa, Arizona0.60.20.50.61.10.30.6
Ogataea neixiangensisOM614788NR_173264275/28098Rotten wood, central China0.20.6--0.10.20.2
Cryptococcus sp. 58OM614753MH697750280/280100Dendroctonus micans gallery, Picea sp., Moscow0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1
Myxozyma melibiosiOM614830KY037840243/24599Dendroctonus monticolae, Pinus ponderosa, California0.20.1---0.20.1
All yeasts88.792.983.851.793.687.392.9
Ophiostomatoid fungi
Ophiostoma bicolorOM614758HE866712315/31699Pityogenes chalcographus, Picea abies, Slovenia0.31.00.1-0.85.21.3
Ophiostoma sp. 1OM614762MW460002326/32999Dendroctonus armandii, Pinus armandii, China1.20.32.20.80.51.11.0
Ophiostoma hongxingenseOM614777MK748194321/32399Ips subelongatus, Larix gmelinii, northeast China0.30.70.5-0.10.60.4
Leptographium truncatumOM614847AB907609295/29799Pinus densiflora snag, Japan c0.2-----0.03
All ophiostomatoid fungi2.02.02.80.81.46.92.0
Some other identified wood- and bark-inhabiting fungi (lichens)
Lophium arboricolaOM614739MK159395250/25199Abies koreana, Republic of Korea-0.11.7---0.3
Hypoxylon serpensOM614784MG098299258/258100Twig of Pinus sylvestris, Germany1.3-----0.2
Orbilia vinosaOM614792KT215265286/28999Branch of Pinus sylvestris, France--0.30.6--0.2
Claussenomyces sp. 22OM614746KY633581239/24299Picea rubens, east Canada0.2-0.3---0.1
Stereum sanguinolentumOM614831KF996533293/29499Wood of Picea abies, Italy----0.3-0.1
(Parmelia sulcata)OM614750MN387112244/244100Lichen, Poland--0.11.3--0.2
(Cyphelium lucidum)OM614798EF551165251/251100Lichen, Sweden---0.8--0.1
Sydowia polysporaOM614744MK762617256/256100Pine, Tennessee, USA-0.07--0.06-0.02
Sarea resinaeOM614747MN720382249/249100Bark of Larix kaempferi, Japan--0.13---0.02
Celosporium laricicolaOM614779FJ997287249/25398Twigs of Larix lyallii, Alberta, Canada--0.13---0.02
All other identified wood fungi1.50.12.42.70.3-1.2
Total no. of generated sequences1445146614831599165717729422
Sequences of taxa presented in the table, no.140513931320883157916698249
%97.295.089.055.295.394.287.5
All detected taxa, no.464445683226143
Taxa presented in the table, no.151114811923
%32.625.031.111.834.434.616.1
a In China, associated with Dendroctonus valens killing Pinus tabuliformis [34]. b In western USA, associated with Dendroctonus jeffreyi on Pinus jeffreyi [35]. c In Ontario, vectored to pine by Tomicus piniperda [36].
Table 4. Fungi isolated from beetles of Ips amitinus occurring in phloem of dead (previous season attacks) and dying (current season attacks) skeletal branches of Pinus sibirica in south-western Siberia. Upon collection, the beetles were dead, and, prior to the isolations, they were surface-sterilised.
Table 4. Fungi isolated from beetles of Ips amitinus occurring in phloem of dead (previous season attacks) and dying (current season attacks) skeletal branches of Pinus sibirica in south-western Siberia. Upon collection, the beetles were dead, and, prior to the isolations, they were surface-sterilised.
Fungal Species Sensu LatoGenBankNumber of Beetles Harbouring Respective Fungus
Access. No.In Branches/Trees a
DeadDyingAll
A1B1C1D1A2B2(%)
Beauveria bassianaOR5842545--19-15 (25)
Lophium arboricolaOQ536234-12--14 (7)
Ophiostoma canumOR574404-1-2-14 (7)
Ophiostoma bicolorOR592582----123 (5)
Ophiostoma hongxingenseOR588874-11---2 (3)
Ophiostoma sp. 2OR5891012-----2 (3)
Chaetomium crispatumOR584257---1--1 (2)
Fusarium avenaceum 1-----1 (2)
Trichocladium griseumOR589102---1--1 (2)
All fungi 833510433 (55)
Number of beetles subjected to isolation10101010101060
a Letters/numbers correspond to the sites/trees as indicated in Figure 1 and Table 1.
Table 5. Wood decay fungi in twenty-six stems of Pinus sibirica attacked by Ips amitinus in south-western Siberia. Age of the trees: 120–160 years, d.b.h.: 38–46 cm.
Table 5. Wood decay fungi in twenty-six stems of Pinus sibirica attacked by Ips amitinus in south-western Siberia. Age of the trees: 120–160 years, d.b.h.: 38–46 cm.
FungusGenBankNo. of Stems (%)Of Those, at Height
Access. No. 0.2 m1.2 m
Heterobasidion parviporumOR57439712 (46)12 (46)-
Phaeolus schweinitziiOR5121008 (31)8 (31)-
Fomitopsis pinicolaOR5121024 (15)2 (8)2 (8)
Porodaedalea piniOR5744013 (12)1 (4)2 (8)
Armillaria borealisOR5758512 (8)2 (8)-
No. of all isolates a 2925 (96)4 (15)
a Fungi were isolated from 21 stems. From two stems, three fungi were isolated, in the following combinations: (i) H. parviporum + A. borealis + F. pinicola; (ii) H. parviporum + P. schweinitzii + F. pinicola. From four stems, two fungi were isolated: (iii) H. parviporum + F. pinicola; (iv) H. parviporum + P. pini; (v) H. parviporum + P. schweinitzii; (vi) P. schweinitzii + P. pini.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pavlov, I.N.; Vasaitis, R.; Litovka, Y.A.; Timofeev, A.A.; Menkis, A. Infestation by Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872), Its Associated Fungi, and Butt Rots in Stands of Pinus sibirica in South-Western Siberia. Forests 2023, 14, 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122383

AMA Style

Pavlov IN, Vasaitis R, Litovka YA, Timofeev AA, Menkis A. Infestation by Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872), Its Associated Fungi, and Butt Rots in Stands of Pinus sibirica in South-Western Siberia. Forests. 2023; 14(12):2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pavlov, Igor N., Rimvydas Vasaitis, Yulia A. Litovka, Anton A. Timofeev, and Audrius Menkis. 2023. "Infestation by Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872), Its Associated Fungi, and Butt Rots in Stands of Pinus sibirica in South-Western Siberia" Forests 14, no. 12: 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop