Next Article in Journal
Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation in Subtropical Mountain Areas Based on Improved Water Cloud Model and PolSAR Decomposition Using L-Band PolSAR Data
Previous Article in Journal
Remote Sensing Applications in Monitoring Poplars: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Severe Drought Still Affects Reproductive Traits Two Years Later in a Common Garden Experiment of Frangula alnus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Forest Functioning under Climate Warming and Future Perspectives on Forest Disturbances

by
Any Mary Petritan
1,* and
Mirela Beloiu Schwenke
2,*
1
Department of Ecology, National Institute of Research and Development in Forestry ‘Marin Dracea’, Closca 13, 500040 Brasov, Romania
2
Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zurich, 8096 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(12), 2302; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122302
Submission received: 10 November 2023 / Accepted: 16 November 2023 / Published: 24 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of Climate Warming and Disturbances on Forest Ecosystems)

Abstract

:
The Special Issue “Impact of climate warming and disturbances on forest ecosystems” underscores the critical importance of understanding how forests respond to these environmental challenges and the legacy of past management practices. Forest ecosystems are facing significant challenges due to ongoing climate change, characterized by rising temperatures and increased frequency of extreme events. The rapid pace of climate change is altering disturbance patterns and the adaptability of forests, which have a direct impact on ecosystem services that contribute to human well-being. This Special Issue features 11 research papers from nine countries. Some key outputs from these research papers include evidence on how climate change is already impacting forest ecosystems. For instance, the climatic envelope of many forest species has shifted due to global warming, making species more vulnerable, especially in lower elevations and at the edges of their distribution. Urgent adaptive measures in forest management are necessary to address this challenge. Climate change also affects vegetation phenology, tree growth, stand productivity, reproduction rates, and stand regeneration. Remote sensing data and ecological modeling techniques play a crucial role in monitoring and understanding these changes, especially in remote regions where field measurements are limited. The rising frequency and intensity of extreme events like droughts, windstorms, and forest fires require enhanced prediction and automatic monitoring. Leveraging machine learning tools and remote sensing data is imperative. This Special Issue provides insights into the intricate relationships among forests, climate change, and human interventions. We provide further research recommendations for the quantification and automated monitoring of forest fires and the management of forests to better withstand storms and increase their resilience to climate change.

1. Introduction

Forests are invaluable ecosystems that have long been recognized for their multifaceted contributions to biodiversity and society. Forest dynamics are generally determined by changes in forest structure and composition over time, including their response to anthropogenic and natural disturbances. Yet, global climate change is affecting disturbance regimes and the adaptive capacity of forests at an accelerating rate [1,2]. (Disturbances such as droughts, storms, and fires have significant impacts on forests and the ecosystem services that they offer. Although there are numerous frameworks proposed for the automatic monitoring of forests [3,4,5,6], there is still a pressing need to enhance our capacity for actively detecting ongoing disturbances and predicting the future impact on forests and tree species. In this context, ground truth data and new technologies such as remote sensing, machine learning, and ecological modeling offer new opportunities for monitoring, quantifying, and predicting the impacts of climate change and disturbances on forest ecosystems [7,8]. Further, rapid climate-induced changes in disturbance regimes, combined with the ongoing legacy of past forest management (e.g., plantation of tree species outside of their natural distribution and different management types), have resulted in a complex and poorly understood interplay of factors that affect tree growth [9].

2. Overview of Contributions

The Special Issue “Impact of climate warming and disturbances on forest ecosystems” aimed to collect scientific research covering the following topics:
  • Forest disturbance regimes (e.g., drought, forest fire, storms, and pathogens);
  • Climate change impacts;
  • Forest resilience and dynamics;
  • Forest management practices;
  • Old-growth forests.
This Special Issue, entitled “Impact of Climate Warming and Disturbances on Forest Ecosystems”, features 11 original research papers by 67 authors from nine countries on three continents: Asia (China, India, Syria, Saudi Arabia), Europe (Belgium, Poland, Romania, Greece), and North America (USA). They provide examples of different regions of the globe on how climate changes and anthropogenic pressure could affect the structure, growth dynamic, and functionality of the forests and thus their ability to continue to provide the ecosystem goods and services and contribute to the well-being of society.

3. Summary of Main Outputs and Findings

The already changed climate has been highlighted by Mihai et al. [10] for different provenances and regions in Romania, by different forest types. The authors showed that the climatic envelope of many forest species has already changed and become less suitable due to climate warming, which increases the vulnerability of species, especially at lower elevations or at the edges of their distribution. For instance, the annual mean temperature has risen by 1.33 °C nationwide, with a clear warming pattern in the plains (Figure 1). The authors warned that climate change appears to be occurring faster than species can adapt or migrate and argue that adaptative measures in forest management are urgently needed. Chandra et al. [11] analyzed changes in the habitat suitability of vulnerable species such as orchids under different climatic scenarios using ecological niche modeling. Their results indicated a reduction in highly suitable areas under future climate conditions and acknowledged the importance of identifying viable habitats to conserve vulnerable species and prevent local extinctions.
Other papers published in this Special Issue have shown that climate changes affect vegetation phenology [12], tree growth [13] and stand productivity [14] but also the reproductivity rate [15] or stand regeneration [16]. Using remote sensing data, such as MODIS together with vegetation indices and vegetation gross primary productivity [12,14], allows the identification of changes in vegetation changes and the link to climate change. This is of great relevance, particularly in remote regions where field measurements are limited. To this end, using the MODIS gross primary productivity model, moving average trend analysis, linear regression analysis, and the climate tendency rate method, Aili et al. [14], analyzed the variation in the vegetation gross productivity of forests in Altay Mountains, China, in response to the daily temperature and precipitations. Dugesar et al. [12] investigated the change in vegetation phenology along an elevation gradient in the main forest types of the western Himalayas and observed a delayed trend for all vegetation types. A Normalized Difference Vegetation Index time series was used for this purpose. Because phenology responded differently in heterogeneous mountain landscapes to climate change, the authors concluded the importance of comprehensive observations at the local level to our improve understanding of forest response to climate change.
Using dendrochronological methods, Qi et al. [13] attempted to determine the main climate factors that influence the radial growth of two coniferous tree species. The study showed the growth response is species-specific and the drought during the growing season is a decisive negative factor. In addition, the authors stressed the importance of studying the effect of climatic factors not only over long periods but also over short periods of time, such as the decadal scale. The results of an experimental study in a common garden [15] indicated that water limitation led to the reallocation of resources toward reproduction rather than growth, an effect that is still present two years later. Respectively, treated shrubs showed a higher germination rate, an adaptive trait that should ensure survival under stress conditions. The authors concluded that the delayed effects of drought on reproductive traits in woody species may add more complexity to the consequences of climate change on species distributions and forest survival.
The rising global temperature together with the increase in the frequency, severity, and duration of extreme events such as droughts, windstorms or fires, followed by various associated disturbances, have already negatively affected forest ecosystems worldwide [17,18,19]. (An example of such events is the extreme and long-lasting hotter drought and heatwaves from 2018 and 2019 that affected forests in Central Europe [20,21] or windstorm Klaus, one of the most devasting windstorms in Europe [22]. As such events left a significant footprint in forest stands, followed by large economic and ecological losses, modern tools such as machine learning [22] or remote sensing and geographic information systems [23] are very useful to build better models to predict forest damage caused by windstorms [22] or to accurately monitor fire intensity and damages [23]. As such extreme events are expected to occur more frequently in the future, improving their prediction and monitoring will be essential for better planning.
In addition to climate change, human disturbance can negatively affect stand characteristics. As reported in another paper published in this Special Issue, some structural stand traits and soil microclimates were altered by the first silvicultural interventions carried out in a former virgin forest [24]. The changed microclimate conditions in the former virgin forest led to greater CO2 soil emissions (Figure 2). Moreover, stand dynamic trough canopy gaps are influenced by topography, with forest gaps occurring more on slopes between 10 and 20 degrees and at higher elevation [25]. Topography also plays an important role in the relationships between climate and different vegetation traits [12].

4. Challenges and Future Work: Forest Fires and Storm Disturbances

4.1. Forest Fires

In recent years, forest fires have captured global attention due to their increasing frequency, severity, and their far-reaching ecological, economic, and social impacts. Forest fires have left their mark on diverse ecosystems across the world. Millions of hectares burned in the last few years, ranging from the Amazon rainforest (e.g., in 2019–2020, 0.9 mil. ha) in South America to the boreal forests of Siberia (e.g., in 2019, 3 mil. ha), and the wildfire-prone regions of British Columbia (e.g., in 2017 and 2018, a total of 2.6 mil. ha were burnt), California (e.g., in 2018, 0.7 mil. ha), and Australia (e.g., in 2019–2020, 18.6 mil. ha) [26,27]. These mega-fires are often exacerbated by climate change, prolonged droughts, heatwaves, increasing aridity [28,29,30], forest management, deforestation [31], and shifts in weather patterns, creating a formidable challenge for forest ecosystems and the communities that depend on them. The occurrence of forest fires varied over time, with 2021 being the worst year in terms of the area burnt. In 2020, forest fires occurred mainly in southern Europe, while in 2021, they also occurred in northern regions and had a higher intensity and burnt area compared to 2000 (Figure 3). Both field observations and remote sensing data are essential to map forest fires. Forest fires (≥30 ha) are mapped globally using MODIS satellite sensors. Since 2018, Sentinel-2 imagery was incorporated, which allowed mapping fires ≥ 5 ha in Europe [32].
To reduce the destructive effects of forest fires, they must be detected as early as possible. This requires early warning systems to predict the areas at high risk [33] and an active fire detection system to identify areas with forest fires [34,35]. This urges us to develop and refine fire behavior models to better predict fire spread, intensity, and behavior under varying climate conditions, including the influence of extreme events like heatwaves and prolonged droughts. Pezzatti et al. [36] proposed a novel metric to predict the risk of future forest fires. Early warning forest fire systems would help to identify regions at increased risk of forest fires and provide insights into adapting forest management strategies to mitigate these risks. Further, public awareness and cross-boundary collaboration are needed to mitigate risks and enhance community resilience.

4.2. Storms and Forest Resilience

Storms induce long-term ecological impacts, including changes in forest structure and composition [37,38]. To face the upcoming storms, we need to identify strategies for enhancing forest resilience to storms, including silvicultural practices and landscape-level planning. The measurements in this regard are at the stand or landscape level. For instance, it is recommended to avoid heterogeneous crowns, gaps, and edges between stands [39]. Yet, with changing climate patterns, understanding the influence of climate change on the frequency and intensity of storms is essential for proactive management.
Forests and how they are managed are very diverse, depending on many factors such as tree species, ecological and environmental conditions, as well as societal demands. As also shown in this Special Issue, climate change affects forest ecosystems and its impact is modulated by forest management [9,40,41]. Therefore, in addition to increasing research that considers both past climate and forest management in modeling forest growth, productivity, and response, there is a strong need to identify such win–win forest management practices (including non-intervention, climate-smart forestry, adaptative management, assisted migration) to better cope with climate change.

Author Contributions

The entire paper development process (conceptualization, visualization, and writing) was carried out by both authors, A.M.P. and M.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson-Teixeira, K.J.; Miller, A.D.; Mohan, J.E.; Hudiburg, T.W.; Duval, B.D.; DeLucia, E.H. Altered dynamics of forest recovery under a changing climate. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 2001–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Beloiu, M.; Stahlmann, R.; Beierkuhnlein, C. Drought impacts in forest canopy and deciduous tree saplings in Central European forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 509, 120075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Beloiu, M.; Heinzmann, L.; Rehush, N.; Gessler, A.; Griess, V.C. Individual tree-crown detection and species identification in heterogeneous forests using aerial RGB imagery and Deep Learning. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Buras, A.; Rammig, A.; Zang, C.S. The European forest condition monitor: Using remotely sensed forest greenness to identify hot spots of forest decline. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Coops, N.C.; Tompalski, P.; Goodbody, T.R.H.; Achim, A.; Mulverhill, C. Framework for near real-time forest inventory using multi source remote sensing data. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2023, 96, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ecke, S.; Dempewolf, J.; Frey, J.; Schwaller, A.; Endres, E.; Klemmt, H.-J.; Tiede, D.; Seifert, T. UAV-based forest health monitoring: A systematic review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Achim, A.; Moreau, G.; Coops, N.C.; Axelson, J.N.; Barrette, J.; Bédard, S.; Byrne, K.E.; Caspersen, J.; Dick, A.R.; D’Orangeville, L.; et al. The changing culture of silviculture. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2022, 95, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zweifel, R.; Pappas, C.; Peters, R.L.; Babst, F.; Balanzategui, D.; Basler, D.; Bastos, A.; Beloiu, M.; Buchmann, N.; Bose, A.K.; et al. Networking the forest infrastructure towards near real-time monitoring—A white paper. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 872, 162167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marqués, L.; Peltier, D.M.P.; Camarero, J.J.; Zavala, M.A.; Madrigal-González, J.; Sangüesa-Barreda, G.; Ogle, K. Disentangling the legacies of climate and management on tree growth. Ecosystems 2022, 25, 215–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mihai, G.; Alexandru, A.-M.; Nita, I.-A.; Birsan, M.-V. Climate change in the provenance regions of Romania over the last 70 years: Implications for forest management. Forests 2022, 13, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chandra, N.; Singh, G.; Rai, I.D.; Mishra, A.P.; Kazmi, M.Y.; Pandey, A.; Jalal, J.S.; Costache, R.; Almohamad, H.; Al-Mutiry, M.; et al. Predicting Distribution and Range Dynamics of Three Threatened Cypripedium Species under Climate Change Scenario in Western Himalaya. Forests 2023, 14, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dugesar, V.; Satish, K.V.; Pandey, M.K.; Srivastava, P.K.; Petropoulos, G.P.; Anand, A.; Behera, M.D. Impact of Environmental Gradients on Phenometrics of Major Forest Types of Kumaon Region of the Western Himalaya. Forests 2022, 13, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qi, C.; Jiao, L.; Xue, R.; Wu, X.; Du, D. Timescale Effects of Radial Growth Responses of Two Dominant Coniferous Trees on Climate Change in the Eastern Qilian Mountains. Forests 2022, 13, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aili, A.; Xu, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, P.; Yang, R. Dynamics of Vegetation Productivity in Relation to Surface Meteorological Factors in the Altay Mountains in Northwest China. Forests 2022, 13, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vander Mijnsbrugge, K.; Schouppe, M.; Moreels, S.; Aguas Guerreiro, Y.; Decorte, L.; Stessens, M. Severe Drought Still Affects Reproductive Traits Two Years Later in a Common Garden Experiment of Frangula alnus. Forests 2023, 14, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, K.; Sun, H.; He, H.S.; Guan, X. Seed Harvesting and Climate Change Interact to Affect the Natural Regeneration of Pinus koraiensis. Forests 2023, 14, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Allen, C.D.; Macalady, A.K.; Chenchouni, H.; Bachelet, D.; McDowell, N.; Vennetier, M.; Kitzberger, T.; Rigling, A.; Breshears, D.D.; Hogg, E.H.; et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 660–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beloiu, M. Forest Response to Climate Warming and Drought in Europe, Bayreuth. Doctoral Thesis, University of Bayreuth, Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Bayreuth, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hammond, W.M.; Williams, A.P.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Adams, H.D.; Klein, T.; López, R.; Sáenz-Romero, C.; Hartmann, H.; Breshears, D.D.; Allen, C.D. Global field observations of tree die-off reveal hotter-drought fingerprint for Earth’s forests. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beloiu Schwenke, M.; Schönlau, V.; Beierkuhnlein, C. Tree sapling vitality and recovery following the unprecedented 2018 drought in central Europe. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buras, A.; Rammig, A.; Zang, C.S. Quantifying impacts of the 2018 drought on European ecosystems in comparison to 2003. Biogeosciences 2020, 17, 1655–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pawlik, Ł.; Godziek, J.; Zawolik, Ł. Forest Damage by Extra-Tropical Cyclone Klaus-Modeling and Prediction. Forests 2022, 13, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, S.; Singh, H.; Sharma, V.; Shrivastava, V.; Kumar, P.; Kanga, S.; Sahu, N.; Meraj, G.; Farooq, M.; Singh, S.K. Impact of Forest Fires on Air Quality in Wolgan Valley, New South Wales, Australia—A Mapping and Monitoring Study Using Google Earth Engine. Forests 2022, 13, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Braga, C.I.; Crisan, V.E.; Petritan, I.C.; Scarlatescu, V.; Vasile, D.; Lazar, G.; Petritan, A.M. Short-Term Effects of Anthropogenic Disturbances on Stand Structure, Soil Properties, and Vegetation Diversity in a Former Virgin Mixed Forest. Forests 2023, 14, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tudose, N.C.; Petritan, I.C.; Toiu, F.L.; Petritan, A.-M.; Marin, M. Relation between Topography and Gap Characteristics in a Mixed Sessile Oak–Beech Old-Growth Forest. Forests 2023, 14, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Collins, L.; Bradstock, R.A.; Clarke, H.; Clarke, M.F.; Nolan, R.H.; Penman, T.D. The 2019/2020 mega-fires exposed Australian ecosystems to an unprecedented extent of high-severity fire. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 044029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haque, M.K.; Azad, M.A.K.; Hossain, M.Y.; Ahmed, T.; Uddin, M.; Hossain, M.M. Wildfire in Australia during 2019-2020, Its Impact on Health, Biodiversity and Environment with Some Proposals for Risk Management: A Review. J. Environ. Prot. 2021, 12, 391–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abatzoglou, J.T.; Battisti, D.S.; Williams, A.P.; Hansen, W.D.; Harvey, B.J.; Kolden, C.A. Projected increases in western US forest fire despite growing fuel constraints. Commun. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grünig, M.; Seidl, R.; Senf, C. Increasing aridity causes larger and more severe forest fires across Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2023, 29, 1648–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Juang, C.S.; Williams, A.P.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Balch, J.K.; Hurteau, M.D.; Moritz, M.A. Rapid Growth of Large Forest Fires Drives the Exponential Response of Annual Forest-Fire Area to Aridity in the Western United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49, e2021GL097131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lindenmayer, D.B.; Kooyman, R.M.; Taylor, C.; Ward, M.; Watson, J.E.M. Recent Australian wildfires made worse by logging and associated forest management. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 4, 898–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. San-Miguel-Ayanz, J.; Durrant, T.; Boca, R.; Maianti, P.; Libertà, G.; Oom, D.; Branco, A.; De Rigo, D.; Ferrari, D.; Roglia, E.; et al. Advance Report on Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2022; Publications Office of the European Union, EU: Luxembourg, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Geng, P.; Sivaparthipan, C.B.; Muthu, B.A. Big data and artificial intelligence based early risk warning system of fire hazard for smart cities. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 45, 100986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Barmpoutis, P.; Papaioannou, P.; Dimitropoulos, K.; Grammalidis, N. A Review on Early Forest Fire Detection Systems Using Optical Remote Sensing. Sensors 2020, 20, 6442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hong, Z.; Tang, Z.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zhou, R.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. Active Fire Detection Using a Novel Convolutional Neural Network Based on Himawari-8 Satellite Images. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 794028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pezzatti, G.B.; De Angelis, A.; Bekar, İ.; Ricotta, C.; Bajocco, S.; Conedera, M. Complementing daily fire-danger assessment using a novel metric based on burnt area ranking. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 295, 108172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Holzwarth, S.; Thonfeld, F.; Abdullahi, S.; Asam, S.; Da Ponte Canova, E.; Gessner, U.; Huth, J.; Kraus, T.; Leutner, B.; Kuenzer, C. Earth observation based monitoring of forests in Germany: A review. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Senf, C.; Seidl, R. Storm and fire disturbances in Europe: Distribution and trends. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 3605–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Thom, D.; Spathelf, P. Adaptive Waldbewirtschaftung zur Minderung von Störungen. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 2023, 174, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Petritan, A.M.; Petritan, I.C.; Hevia, A.; Walentowski, H.; Bouriaud, O.; Sánchez-Salguero, R. Climate warming predispose sessile oak forests to drought-induced tree mortality regardless of management legacies. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 491, 119097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stojanović, M.; Sánchez-Salguero, R.; Levanič, T.; Szatniewska, J.; Pokorný, R.; Linares, J.C. Forecasting tree growth in coppiced and high forests in the Czech Republic. The legacy of management drives the coming Quercus petraea climate responses. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 405, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Changes in the mean annual temperature in Romania across different regions. Adapted from Mihai et al. [10].
Figure 1. Changes in the mean annual temperature in Romania across different regions. Adapted from Mihai et al. [10].
Forests 14 02302 g001
Figure 2. Differences in soil respiration between virgin and former virgin forests. Adapted from Braga et al. [24].
Figure 2. Differences in soil respiration between virgin and former virgin forests. Adapted from Braga et al. [24].
Forests 14 02302 g002
Figure 3. Burnt areas (≥30 ha) produced by forest fires in (a) 2000 and (b) 2021 based on the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) data.
Figure 3. Burnt areas (≥30 ha) produced by forest fires in (a) 2000 and (b) 2021 based on the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) data.
Forests 14 02302 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mary Petritan, A.; Beloiu Schwenke, M. Forest Functioning under Climate Warming and Future Perspectives on Forest Disturbances. Forests 2023, 14, 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122302

AMA Style

Mary Petritan A, Beloiu Schwenke M. Forest Functioning under Climate Warming and Future Perspectives on Forest Disturbances. Forests. 2023; 14(12):2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mary Petritan, Any, and Mirela Beloiu Schwenke. 2023. "Forest Functioning under Climate Warming and Future Perspectives on Forest Disturbances" Forests 14, no. 12: 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop