Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Relationship between Forest Scenic Beauty with Color Index and Ecological Integrity: Case Study of Jiuzhaigou and Giant Panda National Park in Sichuan, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Diversity and Potential Interactions of Soil Viruses and Host Bacteria under Different Land Use Patterns
Previous Article in Journal
Elucidation of the Taxonomy of Three Problematic East Asian Nola Leach, 1815, with Description of a New Species (Lepidoptera, Nolidae, Nolinae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Effects of Artificial Fungi Inoculations on Agarwood Formation and Sap Flow Rate of Aquilaria malaccensis Lam. Using Sonic Tomography (SoT) and Sap Flow Meter (SFM)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mycorrhizal Benefits of Salt-Stressed Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl. May Be Related to P and Mn2+ Contents in Shoots, Biomass Allocation, and K+/Na+ in Roots and Shoots

1
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2
Ecology Department, College of Resources and Environment, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Rural Ecosystem Health in Dongting Lake Area, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3
The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(11), 1882; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111882
Submission received: 1 October 2022 / Revised: 4 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal–Plant Interactions: Latest Advances and Prospects)

Abstract

:
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are taken as bioameliorators to alleviate the detrimental effects of salt stress. However, how AMF affect the performance of Cinnamomum camphora, an economically important species, remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the interactive effects of AMF and salinity on the growth, nutrient acquisition, and ion ratios of C. camphora. A factorial experiment was implemented in a greenhouse with four fungal regimes (inoculation with sterilized AMF, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination), and three salt regimes (0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl). Results showed that salinity alone significantly reduced the total dry weight, mycorrhizal colonization, K+ concentration, and ionic homeostasis (particularly K+:Na+, Mg2+:Na+, and Ca2+:Na+) of whole plants. Mycorrhizal inoculation, particularly with R. irregularis, strongly mitigated some of the detrimental effects of salinity, enhancing the salt tolerance of C. camphora. Furthermore, the host plants benefited from the presence of AMF, mainly because they enhanced P and Mn2+ concentrations in the shoots, adjusted biomass allocation, and shifted the selective transporting capacity of K+ over Na+ from roots to shoots. Our results suggested that building mycorrhizal association between C. camphora and R. irregularis may be useful for plant cultivation in coastal areas.

1. Introduction

The salinization of soil refers to increasing the salinity of soil to high levels (>40 mM or >0.1% soil content) and is an increasing environmental problem in agriculture, forestry, and environmental science [1,2,3]. The total area of salt-affected soil is estimated to cover 1 billion ha in more than 100 countries [4,5]. Furthermore, this area is increasing by 1.5 M ha per year, which will result in 50% land loss by 2050 [6]. Soil salinization is severely aggravated by irrigation with inadequate drainage facilities, erroneous fertilization, and salt-water intrusion [4,7]. Moreover, salinization causes serious soil degradation in coastal areas [8]. Consequently, this is a major problem in China, where the coastline extends up to 3.2 × 104 km, for both the mainland and islands combined [8]. Salinity negatively affects plant water potential and ionic balance through the compounding effects of osmotic stress, ion toxicity, and nutrient imbalance, all of which significantly reduce plant growth and productivity [7,9,10]. In addition to the adaptive mechanisms developed by plants, new biological approaches provide necessary and practical ways of improving plant tolerance to salinity. In particular, there is increasing scientific interest in the role of mycorrhizal symbiosis with respect to plant responses to environmental stresses [10,11,12].
Most terrestrial plants can form fungal symbioses, among which those involving arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (AMF) are the most dominant types [13]. AMF can often be found in saline soils [9,14], even though salinity adversely affects the formation and function of AMF [15]. However, there is compelling evidence that mycorrhizal colonization of the roots improves salinity tolerance in both glycophytes and halophytes [1,12,16,17]. Actually, AM symbiosis is a complex biological interaction, and its impact widely varies under different saline scenarios and specific plant–AMF combinations [18,19]. In particular, some mycorrhizal benefits are attributed to the specific responses of the host plant species to mycorrhizal colonization [9], whereas others are induced by the properties of the colonizing fungus [20,21]. Therefore, it is important to determine the mechanisms that facilitate plant growth under saline conditions. Some physiological processes were identified as an underlying mechanism for the fungi-induced amelioration of salinity stress, including enhancing the acquisition of nutrients with low mobility (especially P), reducing Na+ uptake and translocation, preserving ionic homeostasis, and changing the microbial community in the rhizosphere [9,10,12,22]. However, most studies on this subject have focused on herbaceous plants (72.4%) rather than woody perennial species (27.1%) [9]. Consequently, mycorrhizal effects on tree growth under saline conditions remain poorly understood.
Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl. (also known as the camphor tree) is a member of the Lauraceae family and an economically important indigenous tree species in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam [23]. This species has been cultivated in southern China for more than 2000 years and is widely used for ornamental purposes; producing furniture, perfume, and herbal medicine; and for soil restoration in coastal areas [24]. In recent decades, with the expansion of salt-water intrusion and exaggerated soil salinization in the coastal areas of southern China, high salinity tolerance is becoming a valuable characteristic for plants growing in these areas [8]. However, C. camphora only exhibits moderate salt tolerance, with a salinity threshold of 0.2% (100 mM NaCl) [25]. Furthermore, C. camphora is highly dependent on AMF (with root colonization up to 81.85%) [26]. Given that enhancing nutrient uptake is a prominent effect of AMF on plant performance under stressful conditions [9,13], we hypothesized that pre-inoculating this plant with AMF may alleviate the detrimental effects of salinity stress through nutrient enhancement. Furthermore, because mycorrhizal efficiency is usually stress-dependent, and various fungal species can differently regulate plant response to salinity [2,18], we also hypothesized that salt tolerance conferred by AMF may vary with the intensity of salt stress and fungal isolates. To test the hypotheses, we implemented a full factorial experiment to determine the effect of an established mycorrhizal association on the growth, nutrient acquisition, and ion ratios of C. camphora seedlings under simulated saline regimes. This study is expected to advance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying salt-stress alleviation by AMF in C. camphora seedlings and help toward developing practical ways for soil restoration in coastal areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and AMF Preparation

C. camphora seeds were collected from 30 mother trees that were ~10 m away from each other at the campus of Zhejiang A & F University (ZAFU) (30°14′ N, 119°42′ E) in southeastern China [27]. In the last week of February 2017, the seeds were surface-sterilized with 5% NaClO for 10 min and were then rinsed with sterilized distilled water [28]. Subsequently, five seeds were sown in one plastic pot (16.5 × 18 × 12 cm) filled with 2 kg substrate. The substrate used in this experiment was a combination of field soil and peat at a ratio of 3:1 (v/v) that was exposed to gamma irradiation (25 KGy, 60 Co γ-rays) to eliminate indigenous microorganisms before use [29]. The local soil is acidic and belongs to the Hapludult soil type in Chinese Soil Taxonomy [30]. The soil properties are as follows: pH, 5.87; Olson P, 0.28 mg g−1; total N, 0.75 mg g−1; Na+, 0.52 mg g−1; K+, 7.56 mg g−1; Ca2+, 7.23 mg g−1; Mg2+, 1.21 mg g−1; Mn2+, 0.38 mg g−1 [31]. Sixty days after germination, the seedlings (6 cm in height, and four leaves per plant) were thinned to one plant per pot. During this experiment, the plants were grown in a naturally lit greenhouse, with a mean temperature and relative humidity of 30.1 °C and 68%, respectively. The pots were relocated weekly to reduce edge effects.
Two mycorrhizal fungal species, which are broad-spectrum and reportedly effective at improving plant resistance to salt stress [9,16], were selected as inocula: Funneliformis mosseae (BGC HUN03B) (isolated from the rhizosphere of Roegneria kamoji grown in Hunan Province, China) and Rhizophagus irregularis (BGC BJ09) (isolated from the rhizosphere of Lycopersicon esculentum grown in Langfang, Hebei Province, China) [32]. The two mycorrhizal inocula were obtained by multiplying separately for 5 months using Sorghum bicolor as the host plants in pots with sterilized fine sand as substrate [33]. The soil-based inocula, contained ~160 and 200 spores 10 g−1 of soil in F. mosseae and R. irregularis, respectively, along with chopped AM-colonized S. bicolor roots. The corresponding inocula were mixed thoroughly with the substrate before sowing the seeds in the pots. Before application, the fungal inocula were subjected to the highest possible number test [34].

2.2. Experimental Design and Treatments

The experiment was performed using 12 full factorial combinations of two factors: AMF regime and salt regime. Four AMF regimes (inoculation with sterilized AMF as the control, inoculation with F. mosseae or R. irregularis, either alone or in combination) and three salt regimes (0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl) were evaluated. In total, there were 12 treatment combinations, with six replicates per treatment. Mycorrhizal plants (AM plants) received 20 g of F. mosseae, R. irregularis, or the combined inoculum containing equal proportions of the two fungal species per pot. Non-mycorrhizal plants (NM plants) received the same amount of autoclaved inoculum, combining the two fungal species with an additional 20 mL of combined inoculum filtrate that was sieved through a 25 μm filter to provide similar microflora (excluding AMF) [35].
To prevent salt-induced shock to AMF development and plant fine root growth, NaCl treatment was started on 14 May 2017, 30 days after thinning and seedling establishment. Furthermore, to mimic the saline conditions occurring in most coastal areas of southern China, where salinity levels average between 0.1% (equivalent to 50 mM NaCl; low NaCl stress) and 0.4% (equivalent to 200 mM NaCl; high NaCl stress) [33], the three NaCl solutions (0, 50, and 200 mM) were gradually applied following the protocol of Qiu et al. [31] and conferred electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.22, 2.3, and 9.3 dS m−1, respectively. Leaching was avoided by maintaining soil water below field capacity throughout the treatment. Soil EC was monitored and was adjusted once every 15 days with the corresponding NaCl solution. Plants were irrigated with distilled water when required. To ensure plants were alive, 10 mL of adjusted Hoagland solution was added to the pots weekly [33]. Seedlings were harvested 6 months after salinity stress, on 14 November 2017.

2.3. Measurements

At the end of the experiment, all the plants were gently separated from the substrate, rinsed with distilled water three times, and then separated into roots and shoots. Fresh roots were sub-sampled into two parts, one of which was used to determine mycorrhizal colonization in the roots. The percentage of roots colonized by AMF was determined by staining with 0.05% trypan blue in lactophenol [36]. Then, the samples were examined to determine the percentage of mycorrhiza using the gridline-intersection method [37].
The remaining shoots and roots were separately oven dried at 60 °C for 72 h, and their dry weights were recorded. Three dried samples that were randomly chosen from each treatment combination were ball-milled before elemental analysis.
Total N and P concentrations were measured using the Kjeldahl method and ammonium molybdate blue method, respectively [38]. The concentrations of K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+ were measured using an AA−7000 atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) [39].

2.4. Data Analysis

Mycorrhizal dependence (MD) was calculated using the following equation [16]:
M D % = D W A M F A v g D W n o n A M F D W A M F × 100
where D W A M F is the biomass of AM plants, and A v g D W n o n A M F is the average biomass of NM plants under identical saline levels (n = 6).
To quantify salt-tolerance of the plants, selective transporting capacity (STC) of K+ over Na+ from roots to shoots was computed as follows [40]:
S T C = K + / N a +   in   shoots / K + / N a +   in   roots
Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance to evaluate the effects of salt, AMF, and their combination. Before analysis, all the data were subjected to the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality and Levene’s test for equality of variance. Differences among treatments were determined using the least significant difference (LSD) at p < 0.05. Additionally, partial regression was explored to quantity the contribution of the other parameters of mycorrhizal plants to MD. All analyses were performed using SPSS v. 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R v. 4.0.3 [41]. Graphs were visualized using Origin 2018 software (Origin Lab Co., Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Mycorrhizal Colonization and Plant Growth

NM plants showed no AMF colonization in the roots. Mycorrhizal colonization was determined microscopically in all AMF-inoculated plants, with values ranging from 15.9% to 77.9% (Figure 1). Root colonization of AM plants decreased significantly with increasing salinity. Importantly, the root colonization of plants inoculated with F. mosseae alone, R. irregularis alone, and the combined inoculum decreased by 55%, 60%, and 51%, respectively, under high salinity stress in comparison with the corresponding ones under non-saline conditions. A difference in root colonization was recorded among AMF treatments. For instance, mycorrhizal colonization was higher for R. irregularis alone compared to F. mosseae alone or the combined inoculum under non-saline and highest saline conditions. None of the significant interaction between AMF and salt regime on the mycorrhizal colonization of plant roots was observed (Table S1).
The total dry weight of the plants varied with increasing salinity (Figure 2A). AMF enhanced the total dry weight of C. camphora under non-saline and low-salinity conditions. The highest total dry weight was consistently recorded for R. irregularis-inoculated plants. However, mycorrhizal association negatively affected the biomass accumulation of host plants under high-salinity conditions. Salinity and AMF alone caused various effects on the root:shoot ratio of plants (Figure 2B). Significant interactions between salt and AMF on the total dry weight and root:shoot ratio were observed (Table S1).

3.2. Nutrient Uptake and Allocation

AMF and salt stress had varied effects on macro- and micronutrient concentrations in shoots and roots, with mycorrhizal efficiency depending on the nutrients determined and AM fungal identification (Tables S2–S4). Total N concentrations in shoots of plants were not evidently affected by salinity, whereas the opposite result was observed for roots (Table S2). AM fungal species differently affected the N concentrations in shoots and roots, and their effects depended on saline levels (Tables S3 and S4). Salinity had variable effects on P concentrations in plants. Mycorrhizal colonization consistently caused P concentrations to increase in the shoots and roots under lower salinity conditions. The K+ concentrations in shoots and roots of both NM and AM plants were inversely proportional to soil salinity. Mycorrhizal colonization, especially with R. irregularis, caused K+ concentrations to increase significantly in roots at all salinity levels. The Na+ concentrations in shoots and roots of both NM and AM plants showed a linear increase with increasing soil salinity. Na+ concentrations in the shoots of NM plants, F. mosseae-inoculated plants, R. irregularis-inoculated plants, and combined inoculum-inoculated plants at the highest salinity were significantly higher than those of the corresponding plants under non-saline conditions (by 3694.4%, 468.0%, 913.1%, and 669.0%, respectively). Similarly, Na+ concentrations in the roots of these four corresponding plants increased by 482.8%, 126.2%, 353.9%, and 271.4%, respectively. More Na+ accumulated in roots compared to shoots. Mycorrhizal plants inoculated with single fungal species had significantly less Na+ in their shoots compared to their NM counterparts at the highest salinity level. Ca2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+ concentrations in the shoots and roots differed between saline regimes and AM fungal species.
Furthermore, salinity caused Mg2+:Na+, K+:Na+, and Ca2+:Na+ shoot and root ratios to decline significantly in all plants (Figure 3). Under non-saline and low-salinity conditions, the shoot and root ratios of Mg2+:Na+, K+:Na+, and Ca2+:Na+ of mycorrhizal plants were lower than those of NM plants (Figure 3A–C). Under higher salinity conditions, mycorrhizal fungi had various effects on the Mg2+:Na+, K+:Na+, and Ca2+:Na+ ratios of shoots and roots. Salinity caused the Na+ shoot:root ratio to increase significantly (Figure 3D). Under non-saline conditions, the combined inoculum caused the Na+ shoot:root ratio to increase significantly, whereas the other two AMF had no effects. Under lower salinity conditions, there was no difference in the Na+ shoot:root ratio between NM plants and AM ones treated with any of the three AMF. Under higher salinity conditions, AMF caused the Na+ shoot:root ratio to decrease significantly, except for the combined inoculum, and the lowest value was obtained for R. irregularis-inoculated plants.

3.3. Mycorrhizal Dependence and Selective Transporting Capacity

The STC of plants decreased as salinity increased, however the opposite trend was observed for F. mosseae-inoculated plants (Figure 4A). The STC of mycorrhizal plants inoculated with single AM fungus was more than that of NM plants under the harshest salinity. In contrast, mycorrhizae provided no benefits under non-saline and lower salinity. The MD of AM plants decreased with increasing salinity (Figure 4B). Under non-saline and low salinity conditions, MD was positive, whereas under high salinity conditions, MD was negative. At all salinity levels, the highest values were detected for R. irregularis-inoculated plants.

3.4. Mycorrhizal Dependence and Their Relationships with Other Plant Variables

MD was correlated with the root: shoot ratio, the ions concentrations, and the STC (Figure 5). Furthermore, to quantify their relationship strength, we constructed a fitted model (R2 = 0.910, p < 0.000) as follows:
M D = 2.499   X 1 + 1.327   X 2 + 4.077   X 3 + 2.066   X 4 4.333   X 5 + 4.143   X 6 + 2.736   X 7 1.367   X 8 3.643   X 9
where X1~X9 represent the STC, root: shoot ratio, shoot-P, shoot-Ca2+, shoot-Mg2+, shoot-Mn2+, root-N, root-Na+, and root-Mg2+, respectively.
The shoot-Mn2+, STC, root: shoot ratio, shoot-P, root-N, and shoot-Ca2+ were positively correlated with MD, whereas shoot-Mg2+, root-Na+, and root-Mg2+ were negatively correlated with MD (Figure 5A). Moreover, shoot-Mg2+, shoot-Mn2+, STC, root-Na+, root: shoot ratio, and shoot-P together accounted for more than 86% of the variance in MD, which indicated their contribution to MD (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

Our results showed that salinity caused certain parameters to decline significantly and others to increase significantly in the shoots and roots of C. camphora. The parameters that declined included total dry weight, mycorrhizal colonization, concentrations of K+, Mg2+:Na+, K+:Na+, and Ca2+:Na+ in shoots and roots. In comparison, the parameters that increased included Na+ concentrations in plant organs and the Na+ shoot:root ratio. However, AMF inoculation had generally beneficial effects on C. camphora parameters under low-salinity conditions. Our hypothesis that AMF, to some extent, would mediate salt-induced detrimental effects on C. camphora seedlings was supported. Moreover, mycorrhizal efficiencies varied with saline levels and AMF strains. Therefore, the second hypothesis was also proven. Importantly, our results showed that higher P and Mn2+ concentrations in shoot, root: shoot ratio, and STC appear to be responsible for the higher MD of C. camphora under saline conditions.

4.1. Improved Biomass with Mycorrhizal Inoculation

In this study, AM plants had higher biomass than NM ones under the control and lower salinity conditions (Figure 2), which means that AMF can somehow mediate the detrimental effects of salinity. This finding was consistent with reports on the trees of Acacia auriculiformis [42], Olea europaea [16], and Citrus tangerine [43]. Furthermore, the lowest fungal colonization and mycorrhizal dependence based on biomass occurred at the highest salinity level (Figure 1 and Figure 4B), which may be induced by a high metabolic cost or an improved root respiration for the AM plants under severest salt stress [44]. This result supports the concept that severe salinity inhibits colonization through reduced plant growth and/or declining spore germination, hyphal growth, and branching [15,45]. This phenomenon occurs because a bidirectional relationship exists between host plants and their associated mycorrhizal fungi, whereby plants supply AMF with carbohydrates, while fungi improve the ability of the plants to access scarce and immobile nutrients [13,46]. Accordingly, certain factors that influence carbohydrate production and translocation to the roots [47], such as salinity, might cause root colonization and MD to decline.

4.2. Adjusting Na+ Uptake and Translocation with Mycorrhizal Inoculation

Analysis of Na+ uptake and its distribution between the shoots and roots showed that there was a continuous increase in Na+ concentrations and Na+ shoot:root ratios in NM plants with increasing salinity. However, in plants inoculated with single AM fungus, the responses of shoots were considerably lower, especially under the highest salinity (Figure 3 and Table S3). These findings were in line with those of previous reports [31,35,40,42], showing that AMF confer a regulatory effect on Na+ uptake and translocation from roots to shoots [35,39,48]. This phenomenon might be induced by the retention of Na+ in the root and intraradical fungal hyphae of AMF-inoculated plants, along with the inhibition of their translocation to shoots [3]. Alternatively, AMF might cause Na+ concentrations to decline through the dilution effect, due to growth enhancement [49,50]. Accordingly, the mediation of mycorrhizal colonization might partially enhance the salinity tolerance of AM plants. This is because elevated Na+ in soil or plant tissue could directly hamper the absorption of other nutrients through interfering with various transporters in the root plasma membrane, suppressing root growth by osmotic shock from Na+, and reducing the population of soil bacteria [7,51]. However, other reports showed that AMF sometimes stimulate Na+ acquisition, particularly in halophytes, which generally accumulate more Na+ in shoots compared to roots. This is possible because halophytes have certain anatomical properties, higher transpiration rates, and/or higher Na+ transporter activity [3].

4.3. Enhanced Nutrient Concentratioin and Ionic Homeostasis with Mycorrhizal Inoculation

AMF enhance the nutrient acquisition of plants grown under salt-stressed conditions by promoting and/or selectively absorbing nutrients, as well as accelerating their transport from root systems [10,12]. The current study showed that AM plants had slightly or significantly higher P in both the shoots and roots, and higher K+ in roots, compared to NM plants under lower salinity (Tables S3 and S4). Similar results were reported in previous studies [1,12,52]. The higher P concentration in AM plants could help maintain membrane integrity by reducing ionic leakage, limiting toxic ions within vacuoles, and enhancing selective ion uptake [35], and then ameliorates the detrimental effects of salinity [53]. Furthermore, the current study also showed that the values of tissue N:P ratios of NM plants were greater than 16 at all salinity levels (Figure S1), indicating that NM plants are exposed to P limitation [54]. Notably, the substrate soil in this study had a lower available P (0.28 mg g−1) than the average concentration of soil P in China [55], suggesting that the experiment substrate was in P deficiency. Thus, the decreased tissue N:P ratios of plants inoculated with single AMF under low-salinity conditions (Figure S1) means that the magnitude of P limitation is reduced, which is mainly ascribed to the promotion of P uptake with mycorrhizal inoculation. Nevertheless, AMF significantly increased the N:P ratios of C. camphora plants in karst habitats, where the N:P ratios of the plants were even higher than 16 [52]. Similarly, C. camphora plants were exposed to P limitation in karst soil, whereas AMF greatly promoted N absorption but not P accumulation to compensate for P deficiency [52,56]. This discrepancy suggests that mycorrhizal plants grown in different habitats can adopt different strategies to deal with abiotic stress.
This study showed that mycorrhizal plants inoculated with single AM fungus had higher K+:Na+, Mg2+:Na+, and Ca2+:Na+ ratios than NM plants under the highest salinity conditions (Figure 3), indicating that mycorrhizal association favors ionic homeostasis in host plants [2]. These responses might reduce the detrimental effect of Na+ and, consequently, enhance the salt tolerance of AM plants [9,43]. Some ion ratios, such as the K+:Na+ ratio in shoots, are accepted indicators for evaluating the plants’ tolerance to salinity [49]. This is because compelling important functions, such as photosynthetic activity and nitrogen assimilation, require high K+:Na+ in shoots [7]. Improved K+:Na+ ratios recorded in the shoots of the current study were similar to those reported in Acacia nilotica [50], Citrus tangerine [43], Trigonella foenum-graecum [35], and Valeriana officinalis [2]. K+ plays important roles in plant metabolism, including osmoregulation, stomatal regulation, and protein synthesis [16]. However, Na+ and K+ have identical physicochemical structures. Furthermore, the ability of Na+ to compete with K+ at binding sites is essential for various cellular functions [9]. A higher K+:Na+ ratio could hamper the disruption of K+-mediated metabolic processes and influence the ionic balance of plants [12]. Moreover, the selective transporting capacity of K+ over Na+ from roots to shoots contributed greatly to MD on salt-stressed C. camphora plants (Figure 5). However, AMF-mediated ion homeostasis might be highly dependent on the salinity-tolerance of plant species, fungal isolates, and a specific combination of plant and AMF species [57]. Consequently, the selection of a suitable indicator, such as the K+:Na+ ratio, to quantify salt tolerance should be implemented with caution.

4.4. Underlying Mechanism for Mycorrhizal Dependence

Salinity-tolerance in plants is a complex ability that involves many changes at biochemical, physiological, and molecular levels [40]. Therefore, AMF-mediated alleviation of salt stress involves multiple mechanisms, including enhancement of nutrient uptake, maintenance of ionic homeostasis, and biochemical, morphological, physiological, molecular, and ultra-structural changes [9,10,12]. However, to date, a general principle to understand AM-conferred salt tolerance in plants is missing. For instance, Chandrasekaran et al. [9] concluded that under saline conditions, mycorrhizal benefits are mainly related to enhance P nutrition in host plants. Feng et al. [22] suggested that the higher soluble sugar content in plant roots, rather than P status, is responsible for resistance to salt stress in mycorrhizal maize plants. This study showed that the underlying mechanism for enhancing performance in mycorrhizal plants could be related to P and Mn2+ concentrations in shoot, biomass allocation, and the selective transporting capacity of K+ over Na+ from roots to shoots (Figure 5). Similar to that suggested by Evelin et al. [11], these mechanisms might work in tandem to improve salt tolerance in mycorrhizal plants. The contradictory results across these studies might be due to differences in the characteristics of AMF or because there are specific compatible relationships between symbionts and environmental contexts [58]. Importantly, the identity of AMF and host plants is more important than other variables in predicting plant response to salinity [9]. The current study, based on a comprehensive consideration of salt-tolerance and mycorrhizal benefits, showed that R. irregularis was more efficient than F. mosseae and their combination for C. camphora seedlings. Therefore, selecting the most effective AMF for a specific plant species is critical to improve its effectiveness under stressful conditions.

5. Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that under low-salinity conditions, mycorrhizal colonization, especially with R. irregularis inoculation, confers benefits to the growth of C. camphora plants by enhancing the concentrations of P and Mn2+ in shoots, maintaining ionic homeostasis, adjusting biomass allocation, and consequently, increasing plant resistance to salt stress. Moreover, mycorrhizal efficiency differed with respect to fungal species and salinity levels. These results reinforce existing evidence that AMF can alleviate the growth inhibition induced by salinity, thus, enhancing plant performance. Furthermore, the mycorrhizal association between AMF and C. camphora is of great interest for vegetation restoration in coastal areas. Since the current study was conducted in controlled conditions, there should be caution in extrapolating the results in the field. Therefore, to advocate forestry-level applications, further studies involving a wider range of AMF species and exploring the variability and/or stability of AMF-conferred salt tolerance in the field is required.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f13111882/s1. Supplementary Table S1. F-values and degree of freedom (in parenthesis) of two-way ANOVA for the effects of salt, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and their interactive effects on the growth and physiochemical variables of Cinnamomum camphora plants. Significance levels: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, not significant at p > 0.05. Supplementary Table S2. F-values and degree of freedom (in parenthesis) of two-way ANOVA for the effects of salt, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and their interactive effects on the nutrient uptake and ion ratios of Cinnamomum camphora plants. Significance levels: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, not significant at p > 0.05. Supplementary Table S3. Influence of NaCl and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the nutrient concentrations of shoots of Cinnamomum camphora plants. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05. Supplementary Table S4. Influence of NaCl and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the nutrient concentrations of roots of Cinnamomum camphora plants. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05. Supplementary Figure S1. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the ratios of nitrogen to phosphorus (N:P ratio) of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, resources, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, Y.W.; writing—review, N.Z., Y.L. and A.W.; formal analysis, data curation, and visualization, T.L.; project administration, Y.L., N.Z. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Joint Funds of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LTY22C030003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071644; 41730638; 31400366), and the “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R & D Program of Zhejiang (2022C02019).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

AMFarbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
AMarbuscular mycorrhizal
AM plantsmycorrhizal plants
NM plantsnon-mycorrhizal plants
ECElectrical conductivity
MDmycorrhizal dependence
STCselective transporting capacity of K+ over Na+ from roots to shoots
LSDLeast significant difference

References

  1. Porcel, R.; Aroca, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 32, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Amanifar, S.; Toghranegar, Z. The efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhiza for improving tolerance of Valeriana officinalis L. and enhancing valerenic acid accumulation under salinity stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 147, 112234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dashtebani, F.; Hajiboland, R.; Aliasgharzad, N. Characterization of salt-tolerance mechanisms in mycorrhizal (Claroideoglomus etunicatum) halophytic grass, Puccinellia distans. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 1713–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pereira, P.; Barcelo, D.; Panagos, P. Soil and water threats in a changing environment. Environ. Res. 2020, 186, 109501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ondrasek, G.; Rengel, Z. Environmental salinization processes: Detection, implications & solutions. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Luo, Y.M. Sustainability associated coastal eco-environmental problems and coastal science development in China. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2016, 31, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chandrasekaran, M.; Boughattas, S.; Hu, S.; Oh, S.H.; Sa, T. A meta-analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal effects on plants grown under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 611–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dastogeer, K.M.G.; Zahan, M.I.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Akter, M.A.; Okazaki, S. Plant salinity tolerance conferred by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated mechanisms: A meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 588550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Evelin, H.; Devi, T.S.; Gupta, S.; Kapoor, R. Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Current understanding and new challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Evelin, H.; Kapoor, R.; Giri, B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: A review. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 1263–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; ISBN 978-0-12-370526-6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Aliasgharzad, N.; Saleh, R.N.; Towfighi, H.; Alizadeh, A. Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline soils of the Tabriz Plain of Iran in relation to some physical and chemical properties of soil. Mycorrhiza 2001, 11, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Juniper, S.; Abbott, L. Vesicular-arbuscualr mycorrhizas and soil salinity. Mycorrhiza 1993, 4, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Porras-Soriano, A.; Soriano-Martin, M.L.; Porras-Piedra, A.; Azcon, R. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased growth, nutrient uptake and tolerance to salinity in olive trees under nursery conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.P.; Fu, Z.Y.; Ren, Q.; Zhu, L.J.; Lin, J.; Zhang, J.C.; Cheng, X.F.; Ma, J.Y.; Yue, J.M. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake of Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino seedlings under salt stress. Forests 2019, 10, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Johnson, N.C.; Graham, J.H.; Smith, F.A. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol. 1997, 135, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mahajan, S.; Tuteja, N. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005, 444, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hart, M.M.; Reader, R.J. Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2002, 153, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jansa, J.; Mozafar, A.; Frossard, E. Phosphorus acquisition strategies within arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community of a single field site. Plant Soil 2005, 276, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, G.; Zhang, F.S.; Li, X.L.; Tian, C.Y.; Tang, C.; Rengel, Z. Improved tolereance of maize plants to salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhiza is related to higher accumulation of soluble sugars in roots. Mycorrhiza 2002, 12, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, X.W.; Li, J.; van der Werff, H. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo, Q.; Xu, C.; Zheng, T.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.; Zuo, Z. Leaf morphological and photosynthetic differences among four chemotypes of Cinnamomum camphora in different seasons. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 169, 113651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, J.P.; Wang, S.T.; Yue, J.M.; Zhang, J.C.; Zhang, L.; You, Y.H.; Zhao, W.R. Physiological response of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings to NaCl stress. Sci. Soil Water Conserv. 2016, 14, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yan, M.; Zhong, Z.C. Effects of aluminum stress on growth of Cinnamomum camphora seedligns inoculated with AMF. Sci. Silv. Sin. 2007, 43, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.L.; Song, L.L.; Song, X.Z.; Hänninen, H.; Wu, J.S. Biochar enhances nut quality of Torreya grandis and soil fertility under simulated nitrogen deposition. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 391, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.H.; Liu, S.Y.; Shao, C.L.; Wu, A.P.; He, X.B.; Xia, L.N.; Wang, X.D.; Qiu, Y.J.; Yu, S.Q.; Pei, J.; et al. Enhancement of photosynthetic parameters and growth of Zelkova serrata by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under simulated sulfuric acid rain. Plant Ecol. 2021, 222, 1361–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McNamara, N.P.; Black, H.I.J.; Beresford, N.A.; Parekh, N.R. Effects of acute gamma irradiation on chemical, physical and biological properties of soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2003, 24, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gong, Z. Chinese Soil Taxonomy; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  31. Qiu, Y.J.; Zhang, N.L.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhang, X.L.; Wu, A.P.; Huang, J.Y.; Yu, S.Q.; Wang, Y.H. Mediation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and biochemical parameters of Ligustrum vicaryi in response to salinity. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 112, 101522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xia, L.N.; Shao, C.L.; Zhang, N.L.; Wu, A.P.; Xie, J.B.; Qiu, Y.J.; He, X.B.; Pei, J.; Wang, X.D.; Wang, Y.H. Improved tolerance of mycorrhizal Torreya grandis seedlings to sulfuric acid rain related to phosphorus and zinc contents in shoots. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.H.; Wang, M.Q.; Li, Y.; Wu, A.P.; Huang, J.Y. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and nitrogen uptake of Chrysanthemum morifolium under salt stress. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Porter, W.M. The ‘most probable number’ method for enumerating infective propagules of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Aust. J. Soil Res. 1979, 17, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Evelin, H.; Giri, B.; Kapoor, R. Contribution of Glomus intraradices inoculation to nutrient acquisition and mitigation of ionic imbalance in NaCl-stressed Trigonella foenum-graecum. Mycorrhiza 2012, 22, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Phillips, J.; Hayman, D. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980, 84, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Allen, S.E. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials, 2nd ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: London, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  39. Heidarianpour, M.B.; Aliasgharzad, N.; Olsson, P.A. Positive effects of co-inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis and Serendipita indica on tomato growth under saline conditions, and their individual colonization estimated by signature lipids. Mycorrhiza 2020, 30, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, M.X.; Bai, R.; Nan, M.; Ren, W.; Wang, C.M.; Shabala, S.; Zhang, J.L. Evaluation of salt tolerance of oat cultivars and the mechanism of adaptation to salinity. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 273, 153708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  42. Giri, B.; Kapoor, R.; Mukerji, K.G. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and salinity on growth, biomass and mineral nutrient of Acacia auriculiformis. Biol. Fert. Soils 2003, 38, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N.; He, X.H. Contributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to growth, photosynthesis, root morphology and ion balance of citrus seedlings under salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant 2010, 32, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Otgonsuren, B.; Rewald, B.; Godbold, D.L.; Göransson, H. Ectomycorrhizal inoculation of Populus nigra modifies the response of absorptive root respiration and root surface enzyme activity to salinity stress. Flora 2016, 224, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. McMillen, B.G.; Juniper, S.; Abbott, L.K. Inhibition of hyphal growth of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in soil containing sodium chloride limits the spread of infection from spores. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 1639–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pandey, D.; Kehri, H.K.; Zoomi, I.; Akhtar, O.; Singh, A.K. Mycorrhizal fungi: Biodiversity, ecological significance, and industrial applications. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology through Fungi: Volume 1: Diversity and Enzymes Perspectives; Yadav, A.N., Mishra, S., Singh, S., Gupta, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 181–199. ISBN 978-030-25506-0. [Google Scholar]
  47. Greenway, H.; Munns, R. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1980, 31, 149–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Daei, G.; Ardekani, M.R.; Rejali, F.; Teimuri, S.; Miransari, M. Alleviation of salinity stress on wheat yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under field conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hajiboland, R.; Aliasgharzadeh, N.; Laiegh, S.F.; Poschenrieder, C. Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. Plant Soil 2010, 331, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Giri, B.; Kapoor, R.; Mukerji, K.G. Improved tolerance of Acacia nilotica to salt stress by arbuscular mucorrhiza, Glomus fasciculatum, may be partly related to elevated K+/Na+ ratios in root and shoot tissue. Microb. Ecol. 2007, 54, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Porcel, R.; Azcon, C.; Aroca, R. Regulation by arbuscular mycorrhizae of the integrated physiological response to salinity in plants: New challenges in physiological and molecular studies. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 4033–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kang, L.; He, Y.; Zang, L.; Si, J.; Yang, Y.; Shen, K.; Xia, T.; Tan, Q.; Wu, B.; Guo, Y.; et al. Mycorrhizal networks interacting with litter improves nutrients and growth for one plant through the vary of N/P ratio under karst soil. Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 90, 701–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Azcón, R. Symbiotic efficiency and infectivity of an autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomus sp. from saline soils and Glomus deserticola under salinity. Mycorrhiza 2000, 10, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Johnson, N.C.; Wilson, G.W.T.; Wilson, J.A.; Miller, R.M.; Bowker, M.A. Mycorrhizal phenotypes and the law of the minimum. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1473–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tian, H.; Chen, G.; Zhang, C.; Melillo, J.M.; Hall, C.A.S. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China’s soils: A synthesis of observational data. Biogeochemistry 2009, 98, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, Y.; Cornelissen, J.H.; Zhong, Z.; Dong, M.; Jiang, C. How interacting fungal species and mineral nitrogen inputs affect transfer of nitrogen from litter via arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 9791–9801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hajiboland, R. Role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in amelioration of salinity. In Salt Stress in Plants: Singnaling, Omics and Adaptations; Ahmad, P., Azzoz, M.M., Prasad, M.N.V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 301–354. ISBN 978-1-4614-6108-1. [Google Scholar]
  58. van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Klironomos, J.N.; Ursic, M.; Moutoglis, P.; Streitwolf-Engel, R.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A.; Sanders, I.R. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 1998, 396, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mycorrhizal colonization in the root systems of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50 and 200 mM NaCl. Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the three mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Mycorrhizal colonization in the root systems of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50 and 200 mM NaCl. Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the three mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Forests 13 01882 g001
Figure 2. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on total dry weight (A) and root:shoot ratio (B) of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 6). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on total dry weight (A) and root:shoot ratio (B) of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 6). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Forests 13 01882 g002
Figure 3. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on Mg2+:Na+ ratio (A), K+:Na+ ratio (B), Ca2+:Na+ ratio (C) in shoots and roots, and shoot:root ratio of Na+ (D) of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference for means of either root or shoot according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on Mg2+:Na+ ratio (A), K+:Na+ ratio (B), Ca2+:Na+ ratio (C) in shoots and roots, and shoot:root ratio of Na+ (D) of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference for means of either root or shoot according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Forests 13 01882 g003
Figure 4. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on selective transporting capacity (STC) (A) and mycorrhizal dependence (MD) (B) of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values for STC are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3), and those for MD are stated as the mean ± SE (n = 6). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on selective transporting capacity (STC) (A) and mycorrhizal dependence (MD) (B) of Cinnamomum camphora plants under 0, 50, and 200 mM NaCl. NM, Fm, Ri, and Fm+Ri represent the four mycorrhizal treatments: inoculation with sterilized mycorrhizal fungi, with Funneliformis mosseae or Rhizophagus irregularis, either alone or in combination, respectively. Values for STC are presented as the mean ± SE (n = 3), and those for MD are stated as the mean ± SE (n = 6). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference according to LSD at p < 0.05.
Forests 13 01882 g004
Figure 5. Mean effect sizes of observed variables on mycorrhizal dependence (MD) (A) and their relative contributions to variances of MD (B) in Cinnamomum camphora following partial regression. Abbreviations are as follows: shoot-Mg2+, Mg2+ concentration in shoot; shoot-Mn2+, Mn2+ concentration in shoot; STC, selective transporting capacity of K+ over Na+ from roots to shoots; root-Na+, Na+ concentration in root; shoot-P, P concentration in shoot; root-Mg2+, Mg2+ concentration in root; root-N, N concentration in root; shoot-Ca2+, Ca2+ concentration in shoot.
Figure 5. Mean effect sizes of observed variables on mycorrhizal dependence (MD) (A) and their relative contributions to variances of MD (B) in Cinnamomum camphora following partial regression. Abbreviations are as follows: shoot-Mg2+, Mg2+ concentration in shoot; shoot-Mn2+, Mn2+ concentration in shoot; STC, selective transporting capacity of K+ over Na+ from roots to shoots; root-Na+, Na+ concentration in root; shoot-P, P concentration in shoot; root-Mg2+, Mg2+ concentration in root; root-N, N concentration in root; shoot-Ca2+, Ca2+ concentration in shoot.
Forests 13 01882 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Wu, A.; Li, Y.; Zhang, N. Mycorrhizal Benefits of Salt-Stressed Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl. May Be Related to P and Mn2+ Contents in Shoots, Biomass Allocation, and K+/Na+ in Roots and Shoots. Forests 2022, 13, 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111882

AMA Style

Wang Y, Li T, Wu A, Li Y, Zhang N. Mycorrhizal Benefits of Salt-Stressed Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl. May Be Related to P and Mn2+ Contents in Shoots, Biomass Allocation, and K+/Na+ in Roots and Shoots. Forests. 2022; 13(11):1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111882

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yanhong, Tiantian Li, Aiping Wu, Yan Li, and Naili Zhang. 2022. "Mycorrhizal Benefits of Salt-Stressed Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl. May Be Related to P and Mn2+ Contents in Shoots, Biomass Allocation, and K+/Na+ in Roots and Shoots" Forests 13, no. 11: 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111882

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop