Next Article in Journal
Prescribed Fire First-Order Effects on Oak and Maple Reproduction in Frequently Burned Upland Oak–Hickory Forests of the Arkansas Ozarks
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring a New O3 Index as a Proxy for the Avoidance/Tolerance Capacity of Forest Species to Tolerate O3 Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Actinomycetes of Vietnam Tropical Forests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Vitality Status of Plants: Using the Correlation between Stem Water Content and External Environmental Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Abscisic Acid, Paclobutrazol, and Salicylic Acid Alleviate Salt Stress in Populus talassica × Populus euphratica by Modulating Plant Root Architecture, Photosynthesis, and the Antioxidant Defense System

1
College of Life Science and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
2
Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Alar 843300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Forests 2022, 13(11), 1864; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111864
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 7 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Abiotic Stress on Tree Physiology and Ecology)

Abstract

:
The exogenous plant growth regulators (PGRs) represent a useful strategy for reducing the adverse effects of salt stress in plants. In order to investigate the regulatory effect of exogenous PGRs on the salt tolerance of Populus talassica × Populus euphratica seedlings, in this study, the effects of different foliar spray concentrations of ABA (5 mg·L−1, 15 mg·L−1, 25 mg·L−1), PP333 (300 mg·L−1, 900 mg·L−1, 1500 mg·L−1), and SA (40 mg·L−1, 120 mg·L−1, 200 mg·L−1) on P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings under salt stress (soil salt concentration of 2%) were determined. The results showed that the dry weight, total root length, root surface area, root volume, total Chl content, and photosynthetic parameters of P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings significantly decreased under salt stress and increased their contents of malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2), free proline (Pro), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD). However, ABA, PP333, and SA can mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress on these indicators. Especially, the 15 mg·L−1 ABA, 900 mg·L−1 PP333, and 120 mg·L−1 SA treatments had the best effect on alleviating salt stress, with significant increases in dry weight, root parameters, total Chl content, and the photosynthetic parameters of the P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings, improving their photosynthetic characteristics; meanwhile, increased Pro content and enzyme activity and decreased MDA, H2O2, and O2 content protected the integrity of membrane system and enhanced the salt tolerance of the seedlings. SA resulted in a better ameliorative effect on salt stress compared to ABA and PP333.

1. Introduction

The worsening of soil salinization is one of the main factors that restrict the growth and development of plants, endangers the ecological environment, and affects the sustainable development of the global agricultural and forestry economy and ecosystems. Soil salinization is a global environmental problem. The land worldwide that contains saline-alkali soils exceeds 8.3 × 108 hm2, including 53% alkaline soils and 47% saline soils [1]. The problem is particularly severe in semiarid and arid areas and is predicted to be more drastic in the future [2]. It is estimated that the area of saline-alkali soil is growing at a rate of 1 × 107 to 1.5 × 107 hm2 annually worldwide, resulting in serious salinization hazards and water and soil loss [3]. Countries seriously affected by saline soil mainly include Australia, Thailand, Syria, the United States, and China [4]. According to data from previous work, the area of saline soil in China is about 3.6 × 107 hm2, accounting for 4.88% of the available land area in the country [5]. Xinjiang, located in the arid and semiarid areas of Northwest China, contains the largest area of salinized soil in China [6], which severely inhibits plant growth and hinders sustainable forestry development. Therefore, the development and utilization of saline-alkali land is the primary task for the development of agricultural and forestry production. It is particularly important to vigorously promote salt-tolerant tree species and improve the adaptability of plants grown on saline-alkali land.
In general, excessive soil salt accumulation produces osmotic stress and specific ion toxicity in plants, which leads to secondary oxidative stress, membrane permeability, and plant death in severe cases [7]. It impairs all aspects of plant growth and development, manifesting as the inhibition of plant rooting, photosynthesis, physiology, biochemistry, and other aspects, which further adversely affect plant growth [8]. Maintaining a high cytosol K+/Na+ ratio can mitigate stress-induced deleterious changes, which is an important aspect of maintaining physiological cellular functions [9]. However, under salt stress, a large amount of Na+ and Cl increases the osmotic pressure of soil water, causing the osmotic pressure in plants to be lower than that in the soil. Meanwhile, because of the antagonistic relationship with Na+, the high accumulation of Na+ also inhibits the uptake of K+, Ca2+, and P by plants [10,11]. Therefore, the uptake of large amounts of salt ions by plant roots can disrupt the original K+/Na+ balance in the cell, disrupting the plant’s ability to maintain the ionic balance inside and outside the cell, and ultimately affecting the plant’s entire metabolism. As the first plant organ under stress [12], when the water absorption capacity of roots becomes greatly inhibited, and physiological drought occurs, the plant root architecture changes accordingly [13], thereby slowing plant growth rate. When a large amount of Na+ is absorbed by plants and accumulates in the body, it destroys cell membranes, hinders biosynthesis in the cytoplasm, and causes lipid peroxidation damage [14]. Moreover, it inhibits the activity of photosynthesis-related enzymes, limits the photosynthetic rate, and damages the photosynthetic system [15].
In recent years, plant growth regulators have been used to alleviate salt-stress-induced plant damage, and their relationship with plant salt tolerance has been widely studied. Abscisic acid is a small sesquiterpene molecule and has an important regulatory function on plant growth and development and stress resistance, which is a common plant growth regulator [16]. Under salt stress, ABA can effectively improve the antioxidant capacity of tomato seedlings, reduce the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA), increase the content of proline, and reduce stomatal conductance, which is conducive to promoting the growth of tomato seedlings [17]. Spraying ABA can adjust the levels of ions and organic solutes of wheat seedlings under salt stress, increasing their aboveground biomass and promoting growth [18]. PP333 is a stress protectant with growth regulating properties, which is now extensively used in regulating plant development under normal or stressed conditions. It can promote plant growth, photosynthesis, and other functions by improving the level of osmolytes, antioxidant activity, maintaining membrane stability, and photosynthetic pigments [19,20]. PP333 increases the fresh and dry weight of the shoots and roots of tomato plants and enhances Chl content, Pro content, and SOD activity, reducing the adverse effects of salt stress and enhancing the salt tolerance of their plants [21]. PP333 has been shown to promote plant height, dry and fresh weight, and improve the antioxidant defense system of Vigna unguiculata [22] and Catharanthus roseus [23], which significantly ameliorated the adverse effects of salt stress. SA was first separated from willow bark by the German scientist Johann Buchner in 1828, and it has been shown to be an important hormone involved in regulating plant photosynthesis, the antioxidant defense system, and other physiological processes [24]. For example, the application of SA has been reported to markedly reduce the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes in P. euphratica grown under salt stress, alleviating oxidative damage to the plasma membrane [25]. The application of SA can also significantly improve osmotic potential, the Chl content, and photosynthetic capacity of tomato plants under salt stress while reducing the content of MDA and Pro, preventing membrane damage and promoting the accumulation of dry matter [26]. However, the effective concentration of ABA, PP333, and SA for alleviating salt damage depends on multiple parameters. Especially in trees, the mechanism of abiotic stress response and tolerance of ABA, PP333, and SA, still needs to be investigated. Tomato seeds with 1 mM SA could enhance the seed vigor index, increase the germination rate, and increase the activities of CAT, POD, and SOD, thus reducing the adverse effects of salinity [27]. At the same time, it can also increase the germination rate of wheat seeds and seedling growth, increase the content of photosynthetic pigments, and improve salt tolerance [28].
P. talassica × P. euphratica, an excellent tree variety, is crossbred with P. talassica as the female parent and P. euphratica as the male parent by the Xinjiang Academy of Forestry Sciences and Jimusar County Forest Variety Test Station (Xinjiang, China) [29,30]. It has the characteristics of rapid growth, a strong asexual reproduction ability, and a high survival rate for cuttings. In addition, it has an excellent appearance and offers good landscaping material, with good stress resistance to salt alkali, cold, drought, wind, and sand. It is widely planted in the saline-alkali areas of Northwest China [31]. Our research team has made some progress in unraveling salt stress physiology and in undertaking salt tolerance-related gene mining in P. talassica × P. euphratica [29], but the salt tolerance mechanism of P. talassica × P. euphratica is very complex and needs further research. In order to study and improve the salt tolerance of P. talassica × P. euphratica and promote large-scale planting and promotion, the mitigating effects of ABA, PP333, and SA on different plants under salt stress have been used as a reference in previous studies. In this study, the optimal concentrations of these exogenous plant growth regulators for P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings under salt stress were investigated to clarify the regulatory mechanism of salt tolerance and provide a reference and theoretical basis for the use of plant growth regulators in alleviating growth inhibition in seedlings under salt stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Overview of the Study Site

The study site is located in the P. talassica × P. euphratica nursery (81°18’08” E, 40°36’13” N and altitude of 1014 m) of the seedling base of the 10th Regiment of the 1st Division of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. The area has an extreme continental arid desert climate in a warm temperate zone. The average annual sunshine hours are 2556.3–2991.8 h; temperatures are 10–12 °C; the evaporation is 1876.6–2558.9 mm, with average annual precipitation of 40.1–82.5 mm. There is sufficient light, large temperature differences between day and night, scarce annual rainfall, and strong surface evaporation.

2.2. Plant Material and Experimental Treatments

Two-year-old potted P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings were used to study the alleviating effects of different plant growth regulators on salt stress using open-air potted soil culture. Each pot (30 cm in upper diameter, 20 cm in lower diameter, and 25 cm in height) was filled with 8 kg of experimental soil with pH, organic matter, total nitrogen, alkaline nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, Na+, K+, and Ca2+ of 7.56, 26.55 g·kg−1, 0.92 g·kg−1, 22.11 mg·kg−1, 24.02 mg·kg−1, 124.68 mg·kg−1, 0.14 mg·g−1, 0.03 mg·g−1, and 0.11 mg·g−1, respectively. The initial soil salt content was 0.11%. Referring to previous research of this research group [30], the treatment groups were watered with 350 mmol·L−1 NaCl solution once every 3 d, until the soil salt content (SSc) reached 2%. The CK group was irrigated with deionized water each time.
After salt treatment, ABA, PP333, and SA were sprayed onto the front and back of the leaves every morning and evening for four consecutive days, with distilled water as a control. All seedlings were randomly divided into 11 groups of 6 plants each. The experimental design was as follows: (i) CK (control): foliar spray with water and no NaCl treatment; (ii) NaCl: foliar spray with deionized water and 2% SSc; (iii) A1: 5 mg·L−1 ABA + 2% SSc; (iv) A2: 15 mg·L−1 ABA + 2% SSc; (v) A3: 25 mg·L−1 ABA + 2% SSc; (vi) P1: 300 mg·L−1 PP333 + 2% SSc; (vii) P2: 900 mg·L−1 PP333 + 2% SSc; (viii) P3: 1500 mg·L−1 PP333 + 2% SSc; (ix) S1: 40 mg·L−1 SA + 2% SSc; (x) S2: 120 mg·L−1 SA + 2% SSc; and (xi) S3: 200 mg·L−1 SA + 2% SSc (Table 1).
After 45 days of culture, all indices were determined to analyze dry mass, root structure parameters, Chl content, photosynthetic parameters, concentrations of MDA, H2O2, O2, Pro, and antioxidant enzyme activity. The leaves used for the MDA, H2O2, O2, Pro, and antioxidant enzyme activity analyses were frozen in liquid nitrogen after collection and stored at −80 °C. Each treatment contained three biological replicates.

2.3. Measurement of Growth Index

Three plants were randomly selected from each treatment and taken to the laboratory. After cleaning with deionized water, the seedlings were placed in Kraft paper bags. The samples were then dried in an electrothermal constant temperature drying oven at 105 °C for 15 min and at 75 °C until a constant mass was attained and weighed. Root images were obtained using a Microtek scanmaker i800 Plus (Shanghai Microtek Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) and total length, surface area, and volume were measured using a Wanshen LA-S series plant image analyzer system (Hangzhou Wanshen Testing Technology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China).

2.4. Measurements of Photosynthetic Parameters and Total Chlorophyll Content

The leaf photosynthetic parameters were measured from 11:00–13:00. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr) were measured under a photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of 1200 μmol·m−2·s−1 and a CO2 concentration of 390 μmol·m−2·s−1 at 25 °C using a Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-6400). Ten leaves from each sampling point were measured, with three replicates.
We took 0.05 g of fresh leaves, cut them into filaments and put the samples into 5 mL of 95% ethanol in the dark for 24 h. Then, the extracted solution was analyzed. We used 3 mL of extract to measure the Chl absorbance at 649 and 665 nm. The Chl contents (mg·g−1) were determined by applying the absorbance values to the equations reported by Lichtenthaler and Wellburn for ethanol [32]. Total Chl content was calculated as follows:
Chl   mg · g 1   FW = 6 . 63 A 665 + 18 . 08 A 649   ×   V W   ×   1000
where A = optical density at 665 and 649 nm, V = final volume (mL), and FW = leaf tissue fresh weight (g).

2.5. Measurements of Biochemical Indexes

The amount of MDA was determined by the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reaction [33], and the absorbance of the reaction system was determined at 532 nm and 600 nm. H2O2 was determined by titanium sulfate colorimetry [34], and the absorbance of the reaction system was determined at 415 nm. The superoxide anion content was determined with the hydroxylamine oxygen method [35], and the absorbance of the reaction system was determined at 530 nm. The content of free proline was determined by ninhydrin colorimetry [36], and the absorbance of the reaction system was determined at 520 nm. The levels of SOD were determined using the nitroblue tetrazolium method [37], and the absorbance of the reaction system was determined at 560 nm. The SOD enzyme activity in the reaction system was defined as one enzyme activity unit at 50% inhibition in the xanthine oxidase coupled reaction system. The amount of POD was determined by guaiacol colorimetry [38], and the absorbance of the reaction system was determined at 470 nm. The A470 change of 0.005 per minute per g of tissue in each mL reaction system is defined as an enzyme activity unit. All of the above were measured using an enzyme activity assay kit from Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., (Suzhou, China). All the physiological index measurements were repeated three times, and the statistical results were averaged.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data obtained were processed in SPSS 25.0 with one-way ANOVA, Duncan’s method for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05 significance level), and principal components analysis. All data showed normal distributions. Origin 2022 was used for creating graphs. The data were expressed as means ± SE. The comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in P. talassica × P. euphratica under different treatments was carried out using term weighting and membership function methods [39]. The membership function method formulas were as follows:
F X i = X i     X min X max     X min
F X i = 1     X i   X min X max     X min
where F(Xi) represents the membership function value of each main factor, Xi represents the ith comprehensive index value of each variety, and Xmax and Xmin are the maximum and minimum values of the same index in each treatment, respectively. If there was a positive correlation between the measured index and salt tolerance, formula 1 was used; otherwise, formula 2 was used.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of ABA, PP333, and SA Application on the Whole Plant Dry Weight of P. talassica × P. euphratica under Salt Stress

The 2% SSc treatment reduced the whole plant dry weight of P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings (relative to the control) by 75.07% (Figure 1). After spraying exogenous ABA, PP333, and SA (at different concentrations) onto the leaves (except for P1), the effect of salt stress on the dry weight of the seedlings was significantly alleviated, and the difference between those treatments using different concentrations of the same exogenous regulator reached a significant level. The dry weight, after using the 15 mg·L−1 ABA, 900 mg·L−1 PP333, and 120 mg·L−1 SA treatments, reached a maximum, which increased 2.57-, 2.35- and 2.59-fold, respectively, compared with that found for 2% SSc alone.

3.2. Effects of ABA, PP333, and SA Application on the Root Structure of P. talassica × P. euphratica under Salt Stress

The 2% SSc treatment significantly reduced the root architecture of the P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings relative to the control (Figure 2). After spraying the seedlings with different concentrations of exogenous ABA, PP333, and SA, the effects of salt stress on the root architecture of P. talassica × P. euphratica was alleviated. With increasing ABA, PP333, and SA concentrations, the root architecture of the seedlings showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing.
The P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings, when subjected to salt stress, showed significantly reduced total root length (77.06%), root surface area (72.57%), and root volume (68.93%) compared with the control (Figure 2). The reduction in root growth in the seedlings was alleviated by the exogenous application of ABA, PP333, and SA. The reductions in root length were only 63.85, 29.06, and 46.67% following treatments A1, A2, and A3, respectively, 47.53, 19.27, and 35.09% following treatments P1, P2, and P3, respectively, and 46.14, 11.26, and 33.92% following treatments S1, S2, and S3, respectively, when compared to the control (Figure 2a). The reductions in root surface area were only 64.60, 28.29, and 46.72% following treatments A1, A2, and A3, respectively, 46.10, 12.89, and 40.39% following treatments P1, P2, and P3, respectively, and 36.65, 0.35, and 16.46% following treatments S1, S2, and S3, respectively, when compared to the control (Figure 2b). Finally, the reductions in root volume were only 54.27, 19.78, and 38.95% following treatments A1, A2, and A3, respectively, 44.36, 15.08, and 30.45% following treatments P1, P2, and P3, respectively, and 50.23, 6.18, and 25.79% following treatments S1, S2, and S3, respectively, when compared to the control (Figure 2c).

3.3. Effects of ABA, PP333 and SA Application on Total Chl Content and Photosynthetic Variables of P. talassica × P. euphratica under Salt Stress

After the addition of exogenous ABA, PP333, and SA, the total Chl content of P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings showed differences according to the type and concentration of exogenous hormones applied (Figure 3). The 2% SSc stress reduced the Chl content relative to the control by 65.01%. The three regulators produced similar trends in the total Chl contents, first increasing and then decreasing with an increase in hormone concentration. Spraying 15 mg·L−1 ABA, 900 mg·L−1 PP333, and 120 mg·L−1 SA had the best effect on relieving the stress induced by 2% SSc, resulting in only 7.66, 7.92, and 9.36% reductions in total Chl content, respectively. The rates of photosynthetic inhibition were 57.35, 57.09, and 55.65%, respectively, which was lower than under salt stress alone.
The Pn, Gs, and Tr directly reflected the differences in the photosynthetic characteristics of P. talassica × P. euphratica under various treatments (Figure 4). In this study, the Pn, Gs, and Tr of P. talassica × P. euphratica were significantly reduced under 2% SSc stress and were 43.94, 65.27, and 39.20% lower than the control, respectively. However, the Pn of the seedlings increased by 30.04, 63.10, and 35.39% following treatments A1, A2, and A3, respectively, 18.80, 73.03, and 43.80% following treatments P1, P2, and P3, respectively, and 26.69, 71.43, and 48.03% following treatments S1, S2, and S3, respectively, when compared with that observed under salt stress alone (Figure 4a). The increases in Gs were 33.36, 163.64, and 69.73% following treatments A1, A2, and A3, respectively, 78.82, 166.64, and 106.10% following treatments P1, P2, and P3, respectively, and 51.55, 178.82, and 127.28% following treatments S1, S2, and S3, respectively, when compared to salt stress alone (Figure 4b). The Tr values for P. talassica × P. euphratica increased by 20.00, 56.57, and 35.67% following treatments A1, A2, and A3, respectively; 13.43, 60.90, and 28.81% following treatments P1, P2, and P3, respectively, and 16.42, 57.61, and 37.61% following treatments S1, S2, and S3, respectively, when compared with salt stress alone (Figure 4c).

3.4. Effects of ABA, PP333, and SA Application on MDA, H2O2 and O2 of P. talassica × P. euphratica under Salt Stress

The 2% SSc treatment significantly increased the content of MDA, H2O2, and O2 in the P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings by 70.35, 86.35, and 33.50%, respectively, relative to the control (Figure 5). The increased contents of MDA, H2O2, and O2− were alleviated with the application of ABA, PP333, and SA. The contents of MDA were 28.56, 41.93, and 29.09% higher in the control than those measured in seedlings under the A2, P2, and S3 treatments, respectively (Figure 5a). Moreover, under the A2, P2, and S2 treatments, the H2O2 and O2 contents were significantly different from those under 2% SSc treatment, showing decreases of 42.09, 34.65, and 39.01% (H2O2 content) and 22.04, 23.18, and 22.45% (O2 content), respectively (Figure 5b,c).

3.5. Effects of ABA, PP333, and SA Application on Pro of P. talassica × P. euphratica under Salt Stress

The 2% SSc stress increased the Pro content in P. talassica × P. euphratica (Figure 6). Compared with the control, the Pro content in the leaves of the seedlings increased by 31.10% under salt stress. Compared with salt stress, under treatments A1, A2, and A3, the Pro content increased by 10.00, 26.71, and 15.68%, respectively; treatments P1, P2, and P3 increased the Pro content by 12.40, 31.93, and 21.55%, respectively, and treatments S1, S2, and S3 increased the Pro content by 14.10, 37.15, 22.43%, respectively. Among them, the Pro content of the 120 mg·L−1 SA treatment accumulated the most.

3.6. Effects of ABA, PP333, and SA Application on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of P. talassica × P. euphratica under Salt Stress

The 2% SSc stress increased the SOD and POD activities in P. talassica × P. euphratica (Figure 7). Compared with the control, the activities of SOD and POD in the leaves of the seedlings increased by 98.79 and 66.49%, respectively. Compared with salt stress, under treatments A1, A2, and A3, SOD activity increased by 10.54, 30.30, and 19.45%, and POD activity by 12.13, 46.79, and 33.03%, respectively; treatments P1, P2, and P3 increased SOD activity by 11.50, 33.48, and 21.77%, and POD activity by 6.24, 46.54, and 32.36%, respectively, and treatments S1, S2, and S3 increased SOD activity by 12.88, 34.06, and 23.47%, and POD activity by 26.05, 52.01, and 42.72%, respectively. The PP333 treatment at 300 mg·L−1 did not impact POD gene expression.

3.7. Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis of the Effects of the Three Plant Growth Regulators on the Growth, Photosynthesis, Physiological, and Biochemical Indexes of P. talassica × P. euphratica under Salt Stress

To avoid the limitation of a single index evaluation, a comprehensive evaluation of 14 indexes, including the dry weight, root length, and root surface area of the P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings under the treatment of three plant growth regulators, were measured to judge the impact of different external regulators on the salt tolerance of P. talassica × P. euphratica under 2% SSc stress (Table 2). The order of evaluation for the different treatments was S2 > P2 > A2 > S3 > P3 > A3 > S1 > P1 > A1. In summary, 120 mg·L−1 SA had the best effect on enhancing the salt tolerance of the P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings.

4. Discussion

Proper soil salinity can promote the growth of many halophytes [40]. However, excessive soil salinity will cause salt damage to plants and inhibit their growth. Therefore, plants must establish a variety of regulatory mechanisms to respond to salt stress and maintain growth [41]. The rational use of plant growth regulators in the form of foliar sprays can mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress [42]. Research shows that ABA can improve photosynthetic capacity and biomass accumulation and alleviate the physiological damage caused by stress to plants [43]. Paclobutrazol can improve the stress resistance of Sequoia sempervirens seedlings by improving their photosynthetic characteristics [44]. SA can improve the antioxidant capacity and salt tolerance of potato [45]. This study clarified the physiological response mechanism of spraying plant growth regulators onto P. talassica × P. euphratica under soil salt stress, which is necessary to alleviate soil salt stress and improve the utilization of saline soils in forestry.
In this study, we evaluated the effects of soil salinity and plant growth regulators on the growth indicators of P. talassica × P. euphratica. The whole plant biomass and root parameters of P. talassica × P. euphratica were significantly reduced at 2% SSc treatment. The osmotic stress and ion toxicity of soil salinity were the main reasons for the growth decline. Roots provide fixation and support for plants while absorbing nutrients and water from the soil and transmitting it to supply its growth and development needs [46]. Its morphological structure reflects the degree of development of the plant root system and also the growth state of the whole plant. Therefore, when the salt content of soil increases, the root architecture is inhibited by the stress, which restricts the growth and development of plants and even leads to their death [47]. However, when foliar spraying ABA, PP333, and SA onto P. talassica × P. euphratica, its biomass, total root length, root surface area, and root volume showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with increasing regulator concentrations. Both 900 mg·L−1 PP333 and 120 mg·L−1 SA had the most obvious positive regulatory influence on the root parameters of the P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings and the best mitigating effects. Plant growth regulators played a great role in restoring the salt resistance of the P. talassica × P. euphratica roots, making them stronger, enhancing their ability to absorb nutrients and water, and alleviating the stressful effects of the salt environment on P. talassica × P. euphratica to some extent.
Chl enables plant cells to absorb and convert light energy and is the main pigment involved in photosynthesis. Its content can be used as a parameter for physiological metabolism, nutritional status, and aging in the leaves [48]. Researchers have discovered that SA stimulates the synthesis of Chl and slows the rate of Chl reduction, thus delaying a decline in Chl content [49,50]. Our investigation demonstrated a reduction in total Chl content in the leaves of P. talassica × P. euphratica under salt stress and a decline in its ability to assimilate light energy, which may be related to the enhancement of Chl enzyme activity under salt stress to promote Chl decomposition. The electron transport chain and energy transport in the photosynthetic system may also be impacted [51], causing the inhibition of photosynthesis. In addition, salt stress can inhibit Pn, Tr, and Gs in the leaves of P. talassica × P. euphratica, thereby reducing photosynthetic efficiency, which is similar to the results for Ulmus pumila [52] and Populus cathayana [53]. This may occur because salt stress leads to a decrease in Gs in the leaves, making it difficult to supply the CO2 concentration required for photosynthesis and leading to a decrease in the rate of photosynthesis. After spraying exogenous ABA, PP333, and SA on the leaves of P. talassica × P. euphratica, the Pn, Tr, and Gs increased first and then decreased with increasing hormone concentration, but all increased to varying degrees. Foliar sprays of 15 mg·L−1 ABA, 900 mg·L−1 PP333, and 120 mg·L−1 SA had the most obvious positive regulatory influence on the photosynthetic parameters of P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings and the best mitigating effects. Spraying exogenous hormones on the leaves can adjust the Gs, accelerate carbon carboxylation, slow stomatal restriction, and enhance the photosynthetic capacity of plants [54,55]. ABA, PP333, and SA have been shown to alleviate the adverse effects of abiotic stress on plants and improve photosynthetic performance [56]. The results found in this study were similar to those reported for Populus [57], Curcuma longa [58], and Perennial Ryegrass [59].
MDA is one of the main products of membrane lipid peroxidation. It is combined with H2O2 and O2, which are a measure of oxidative damage to plants. Excessive reactive oxygen species and MDA lead to membrane peroxidation, increased membrane permeability, and damage to the plant’s defense systems, affecting physiological and biochemical metabolism [60]. In this study, the contents of MDA, H2O2, and O2 in P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings under salt stress increased significantly, which damaged the cell membrane system and led to the continuous accumulation of membrane lipid peroxides. The spraying of ABA, PP333, and SA can significantly reduce the content of MDA, H2O2, and O2, and alleviate the damage of membrane lipid peroxide, which is induced by salt injuries to plants. Pro can regulate the osmotic potential of plant cells. The accumulation of its content can enhance osmotic adjustment ability, reduce the inhibition of antioxidant enzyme activity under salt stress, and, thus, improve the salt tolerance of plants [61]. In this study, Pro content tended to increase under salt stress, indicating that salt stress promotes the accumulation of proline to mitigate salt damage. ABA, PP333, and SA treatments increased the content of proline, indicating that they had the function of regulating proline metabolism and could alleviate the damage of the P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings under salt stress. The results found in this study were similar to those reported for rice seedlings [62] and Mentha simplex [63].
SOD and POD are two important antioxidant enzymes for scavenging active oxygen from plants. Improving the activity of these enzymes can alleviate growth inhibition under salt stress and improve the resistance of the plant seedlings. SOD can catalyze the conversion of O2 to H2O2 [64], and POD can convert H2O2 to H2O. Exogenous ABA, PP333, and SA enhanced the activity of SOD and POD in the leaves of P. talassica × P. euphratica and reduced the increase in MDA, H2O2, and O2 contents under salt stress, indicating that these three exogenous plant growth regulators can alleviate the oxidative stress caused by abiotic stress. ABA is involved in the restoration of osmotic and antioxidant mechanisms of rice under salt stress [65]. PP333 can improve the antioxidant capacity of sweet sorghum under salt stress [66]. This is similar to the results obtained in Phoenix dactylifera [67], Punica granatum [68], and Platycladus orientalis [69].
In conclusion, our results showed that the foliar spraying of exogenous ABA, PP333, and SA at a certain concentration could adjust the osmotic capacity of P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings, reduce the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation, enhance cell membrane stability and the antioxidant defense system, promote root growth and development and biomass accumulation, reduce chlorophyll decomposition, and improve photosynthetic performance, thereby reducing the adverse effects of salt stress on P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings. However, how exogenous ABA, PP333, and SA affect the molecular mechanisms of salt resistance and endogenous hormone interactions on P. talassica × P. euphratica seedlings remains to be further researched in the future.

5. Conclusions

Our results revealed that 2% SSc stress significantly inhibited the growth, root structure, photosynthetic characteristics, and physiological and biochemical characteristics of P. talassica × P. euphratica. Foliar spraying with ABA, PP333, and SA in appropriate concentrations significantly promoted root morphological development, which was conducive to the accumulation of dry matter in the plants, alleviating the damage caused by salt stress and promoting the growth of leaves and, thus, increasing chlorophyll content and photosynthetic capacity. Meanwhile, ABA, PP333, and SA could inhibit increases in MDA, H2O2, O2, and proline contents, protecting the stability of the cell membrane structure and improving the activity of SOD and POD antioxidant enzymes, which could increase cold resistance and reduce the production of reactive oxygen species. The optimal concentrations of ABA, PP333, and SA for alleviating salt stress were 15 mg·L−1, 900 mg·L−1, and 120 mg·L−1, respectively. Among them, 120 mg·L−1 SA was the most effective for protecting P. talassica × P. euphratica against salt stress.

Author Contributions

Z.H. conceived and directed the project; M.S. and M.Z. performed all the experiments and the statistical analyses, and wrote the paper; Y.L. participated in part of the experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Open Project of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin (Funding number: BRZD1902, Funder: Corps Key Laboratory). This work was also funded by Selection and Cultivation Project of “Talents of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps” (Funding number: 38000020924, Funder: Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Gao, Y.M.; Han, Y.Q.; Li, X.; Li, M.Y.; Wang, C.X.; Li, Z.W.; Wang, Y.J.; Wang, W.D. A salt-tolerant Streptomyces paradoxus D2-8 from rhizosphere Soil of Phragmites communis augments soybean tolerance to soda saline-alkali stress. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2022, 71, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Corwin, D.L. Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2021, 72, 842–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, W.Z.; Jiao, Y.; Yang, M.D.; Wen, H.Y.; Liu, L.J. Absorbed carbon dioxide in saline soil from northwest China. Catena 2021, 207, 105677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meena, M.D.; Yadav, R.K.; Narjary, B.; Yadav, G.; Jat, H.S.; Sheoran, P.; Meena, M.K.; Antil, R.S.; Meena, B.L.; Singh, H.V.; et al. Municipal solid waste (MSW): Strategies to improve salt affected soil sustainability: A review. Waste Manag. 2019, 84, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, J.G.; Pu, L.J.; Han, A.F.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, R.S.; Xiang, Y.Z. Soil salinization research in China: Advances and prospects. J. Geogr. Sci. 2014, 24, 943–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liang, M.; Mi, X.J.; Li, C.H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.G.; Ma, J.; Hu, J.L. Salinity characteristics and halophytic vegetation diversity of uncultivated saline-alkali soil in Junggar Basin, Xinjiang. Arid Land Geogr. 2022, 45, 185–196. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  7. Ben Laouane, R.; Meddich, A.; Bechtaoui, N.; Oufdou, K.; Wahbi, S. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobia Symbiosis on the Tolerance of Medicago Sativa to Salt Stress. Gesunde Pflanzen 2019, 71, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Evelin, H.; Devi, T.S.; Gupta, S.; Kapoor, R. Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Current understanding and new challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ahanger, M.A.; Agarwal, R.M.; Tomar, N.S.; Shrivastava, M. Potassium induces positive changes in nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant system of oat (Avena sativa L cultivar Kent). J. Plant Interact. 2015, 10, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Wirth, S.; Egamberdieva, D. The interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic bacteria enhances plant growth of Acacia gerrardii under salt stress. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ait-El-Mokhtar, M.; Ben Laouane, R.; Anli, M.; Boutasknit, A.; Wahbi, S.; Meddich, A. Use of mycorrhizal fungi in improving tolerance of the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) seedlings to salt stress. Sci. Horti (Amst.) 2019, 253, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McCormack, M.L.; Dickie, I.A.; Eissenstat, D.M.; Fahey, T.J.; Fernandez, C.W.; Guo, D.; Helmisaari, H.S.; Hobbie, E.A.; Iversen, C.M.; Jackson, R.B.; et al. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Petretto, G.L.; Urgeghe, P.P.; Massa, D.; Melito, S. Effect of salinity (NaCl) on plant growth, nutrient content, and glucosinolate hydrolysis products trends in rocket genotypes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 141, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, F.F.; Zhan, D.; Xu, L.X.; Han, L.B.; Zhang, X.Z. Antioxidant and hormone responses to heat stress in two Kentucky bluegrass cultivars contrasting in heat tolerance. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 139, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ashraf, M.; Harris, P.J.C. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica 2013, 51, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, S.; Shah, S.H.; Vimala, Y.; Jatav, H.S.; Ahmad, P.; Chen, Y.; Siddique, K.H.M. Abscisic acid: Metabolism, transport, crosstalk with other plant growth regulators, and its role in heavy metal stress mitigation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 972856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, E.M.; Liu, M.; Zhou, R.; Jiang, F.L.; Sun, M.T.; Wen, J.Q.; Wu, Z. Relationship between melatonin and abscisic acid in response to salt stress of tomato. Sci. Horti-Amsterdam 2021, 285, 110176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.Y.; Li, S.X.; Wang, J.H.; Lin, J.X. Exogenous Abscisic Acid Alleviates Harmful Effect of Salt and Alkali Stresses on Wheat Seedlings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. 2020, 17, 3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Soumya, P.R.; Kumar, P.; Pal, M. Paclobutrazol: A novel plant growth regulator and multi-stress ameliorant. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 22, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Desta, B.; Amare, G. Paclobutrazol as a plant growth regulator. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tuna, A.L. Influence of foliarly applied different triazole compounds on growth, nutrition, and antioxidant enzyme activities in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under salt stress. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2014, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar]
  22. Manivannan, P.; Jaleel, C.A.; Kishorekumar, A.; Sankar, B.; Somasundaram, R.; Panneerselvam, R. Protection of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. plants from salt stress by paclobutrazol. Colloids Surf. B 2008, 61, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jaleel, C.A.; Ragupathi, G.; Paramasivam, M.; Paramasivam, R. Responses of antioxidant defense system of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. to paclobutrazol treatment under salinity. Acta Physiol. Plant 2007, 29, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gurpreet, K.; Yamini, T.; Bavita, A. Salicylic acid: A key signal molecule ameliorating plant stresses. Cereal Res. Commun. 2022, 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rao, S.P.; Du, C.; Li, A.J.; Xia, X.L.; Yin, W.L.; Chen, J.H. Salicylic acid alleviated salt damage of Populus euphratica: A physiological and transcriptomic analysis. Forests 2019, 10, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mimouni, H.; Wasti, S.; Manaa, A.; Gharbi, E.; Chalh, A.; Vandoorne, B.; Lutts, S.; Ben Ahmed, H. Does salicylic acid (SA) improve tolerance to salt stress in plants? A study of SA effects on tomato plant growth, water dynamics, photosynthesis, and biochemical parameters. Omics-A J. Integr. Biol. 2016, 20, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gaba, R.; Gupta, N.; Jindal, S.K. Effect of Seed Treatment on Seed Germination and Vigour Parameters in Seeds Subjected to Salt Stress in Tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.). Indian J. Ecol. 2018, 45, 892–894. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tania, S.S.; Rahaman, M.d.M.; Rauf, F.; Suborna, M.A.; Kabir, M.H.; Hoque, M.d.A.; Rhaman, M.S. Seed priming with Salicylic Acid (SA) and Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Improve Germination and Seedling Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) under Salt Stress. AJRCS 2021, 6, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.; Han, Z.J.; Su, M.X.; Zhang, M. Transcriptomic profile analysis of Populus talassica × Populus euphratica response and tolerance under salt stress conditions. Genes 2022, 13, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, Y. A Preliminary on the Physiological and Ecological Stress Resistance of Populus talassica × P. euphratica; Tarim University: Xinjiang, China, 2021. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Tang, H.Y.; Shi, J.Y.; Han, Z.J.; Bai, M.H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, M. Physiological Response of Populus talassica× P. euphratica to Na2SO4 Environment. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2021, 37, 38–42. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  32. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 11, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lei, Y.B.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C.Y. Physiological and biochemical responses to high Mn concentrations in two contrasting Populus cathayana populations. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brennan, T.; Frenkel, C. Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the regulation of senescence in pear. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, S.; Lu, S.; Xu, X.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and isozyme profiles in leaves of male and female Populus cathayana infected with Melampsora larici-populina. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hassan, F.; Ali, E. Effects of salt stress on growth, antioxidant enzyme activity and some other physiological parameters in jojoba [Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider] plant. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2014, 8, 1615–1624. [Google Scholar]
  37. Stevens, J.; Senaratna, T.; Sivasithamparam, K. Salicylic acid induces salinity tolerance in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Roma): Associated changes in gas exchange, water relations and membrane stabilisation. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 49, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hammerschmidt, R.; Nuckles, E.; Kuć, J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1982, 20, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garratt, L.C.; Janagoudar, B.S.; Lowe, K.C.; Anthony, P.; Davey, M.R. Salinity tolerance and antioxidant status in cotton cultures. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bui, E.N. Soil salinity: A neglected factor in plant ecology and biogeography. J. Arid Environ. 2013, 92, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, S.D.; Zhangy, Q.K.; Liu, M.Y.; Zhou, H.P.; Ma, C.L.; Wang, P.P. Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khan, N.A.; Nazar, R.; Iqbal, N.; Anjum, N.A. Phytohormones and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 90–91. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hewage, K.A.H.; Yang, J.F.; Wang, D.; Hao, G.F.; Yang, G.F.; Zhu, J.K. Chemical Manipulation of Abscisic Acid Signaling: A New Approach to Abiotic and Biotic Stress Management in Agriculture. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ju, S.M.; Xu, D.L.; Zhan, C.Y.; Ji, L.Z.; Yin, T.C.; Li, Z.L.; Lu, Z.Q. Influence of Paclobutrazol on the Growth and Photosynthesis of Sequoia sempervirens Seedlings. J. Hortic. Res. 2019, 27, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Faried, H.N.; Ayyub, C.M.; Wattoo, F.M.; Bashir, M.; Razzaq, K.; Akhtar, G.; Hussain, A.; Ullah, S.; Wattoo, J.I.; Amin, M.; et al. Assessing salt tolerance induction in potato by salicylic acid using morpho-physio-biochemical, ionic, and yield indices. Potato Res. 2022, 65, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Q.W.; Liang, J.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Feng, J.G.; Song, M.H.; Gao, J.Q. Biochar addition affects root morphology and nitrogen uptake capacity in common reed (Phragmites australis). Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 766, e144381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Francisco, M.; Laura, d.L.; González, R.S.; Andreas, N.; Hamid, M.; Florian, F.; Carolina, S.; Martin, C. Identification of regulatory pathways involved in the reacquisition of root growth after salt stress in Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2007, 51, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  48. Croxdale, J.G.; Omasa, K. Chlorophyll a fluorescence and carbon assimilation in developing leaves of light-grown cucumber. Plant Physiol. 1990, 93, 1078–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Aftab, T.; Khan, M.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Idrees, M.; Naeem, M. Role of salicylic acid in promoting salt stress tolerance and enhanced artemisinin production in Artemisia annua L. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 30, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Arfan, M.; Athar, H.R.; Ashraf, M. Does exogenous application of salicylic acid through the rooting medium modulate growth and photosynthetic capacity in two differently adapted spring wheat cultivars under salt stress? Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chaves, M.M.; Maroco, J.P.; Preira, J.S. Understanding plant responses to drought-from genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 239–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qiu, T.; Wang, Y.; Geng, X.N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Kang, X.Y. Growth, photosynthesis, and reactive oxygen system responses of allotriploid Populus cathayana to salt stress. Photosynthetica 2020, 58, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, P.F.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Q.F.; Bu, C.H.; Lu, C.H.; Srivastava, S.; Zhang, D.Q.; Song, Y.P. Gene coexpression network analysis indicates that hub genes related to photosynthesis and starch synthesis modulate salt stress tolerance in Ulmus pumila. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Farquhar, G.D.; Sharkey, T.D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1982, 33, 317–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nazar, R.; Iqbal, N.; Syeed, S.; Khan, N.A. Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 168, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Husen, A.; Iqbal, M.; Sohrab, S.S.; Ansari, M.K.A. Salicylic acid alleviates salinity-caused damage to foliar functions, plant growth and antioxidant system in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Br.). Agric. Food Secur. 2018, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. He, F.; Wang, H.L.; Li, H.G.; Su, Y.Y.; Li, S.; Yang, Y.L.; Feng, C.H.; Yin, W.L.; Xia, X.L. PeCHYR1, a ubiquitin E3 ligase from Populus euphratica, enhances drought tolerance via ABA-induced stomatal closure by ROS production in Populus. Plant biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1514–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Daonapa, C.; Rujira, T.; Thapanee, S.; Thanyaporn, S.; Suriyan, C.U. Regulation of curcuminoids, photosynthetic abilities, total soluble sugar, and rhizome yield traits in two cultivars of turmeric (Curcuma longa) using exogenous foliar paclobutrazol. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2021, 49, 12445. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, Z.Y.; Dong, S.; Teng, K.; Chang, Z.H.; Zhang, X.Z. Exogenous salicylic acid optimizes photosynthesis, antioxidant metabolism, and gene expression in Perennial Ryegrass subjected to salt stress. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ribeiro, C.W.; Korbes, A.P.; Garighan, J.A.; Jardim-Messeder, D.; Carvalho, F.E.L.; Sousa, R.H.V.; Caverzan, A.; Teixeira, F.T.; Silveira, J.A.G.; Margis-Pinheiro, M. Rice peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase knockdown affects ROS signaling and triggers early leaf senescence. Plant Sci. 2017, 263, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Abbaspour, H. Effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzymes, and proline accumulation in pistachio plants. J. Med. Plant Res. 2012, 6, 526529. [Google Scholar]
  62. Bundit, K.; Suriyan, C.U.; Bualuang, F.; Jamnong, U.; Kobkiat, S. Regulation on Antioxidant Defense System in Rice Seedlings (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica cv. ‘Pathumthani 1’) Under Salt Stress by Paclobutrazol Foliar Application. Not. Bot. Horti Agrob. 2018, 47, 368–377. [Google Scholar]
  63. Farhadi, N.; Ghassemi-Golezani, K. Physiological changes of Mentha pulegium in response to exogenous salicylic acid under salinity. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam 2020, 267, 109325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Perry, J.J.; Shin, D.S.; Getzoff, E.D.; Tainer, J.A. The structural biochemistry of the superoxide dismutases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Indraneel, S.; Arijit, G.; Debabrata, D.; Masayuki, F.; Mirza, H.; Kumar, A.M. Differential impact of nitric oxide and abscisic acid on the cellular and physiological functioning of sub1A QTL bearing rice genotype under salt stress. Plants 2022, 11, 1084. [Google Scholar]
  66. Forghani, A.H.; Almodares, A.; Ehsanpour, A.A. The role of gibberellic acid and paclobutrazol on oxidative stress responses induced by In vitro salt stress in sweet sorghum. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 67, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shareef, H.J.; Abbas, M.F.; Jasim, A.M. Response of date palm offshoots (Phoenix dactylifera L.) to the foliar spray of salicylic acid and citric acid under salinity conditions. Folia Oecol. 2022, 49, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khalil, H.A.; ElAnsary, D.O.; Ahmed, Z.F.R. Mitigation of salinity stress on pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Wonderful) plant using salicylic acid foliar spray. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yao, X.M.; Ji, J.; Yue, J.Y.; Shi, S.Q.; Ou, C.; Jiang, Z.P.; Chang, E.M. Exogenous abscisic acid modulates reactive oxygen metabolism and related gene expression in Platycladus orientalis under H2O2-induced stress. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 67, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on the whole plant dry weight of P. talassica × P. euphratica under controlled and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on the whole plant dry weight of P. talassica × P. euphratica under controlled and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 13 01864 g001
Figure 2. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on the root length (a), root surface area (b), and root volume (c) of P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on the root length (a), root surface area (b), and root volume (c) of P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 13 01864 g002
Figure 3. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on total Chl content in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on total Chl content in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 13 01864 g003
Figure 4. Effects of ABA, PP333, and SA on Pn (a), Gs (b), and Tr (c) in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effects of ABA, PP333, and SA on Pn (a), Gs (b), and Tr (c) in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 13 01864 g004
Figure 5. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on MDA (a), H2O2 (b), and O2 (c) in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on MDA (a), H2O2 (b), and O2 (c) in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 13 01864 g005
Figure 6. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on Pro in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on Pro in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 13 01864 g006
Figure 7. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on SOD (a) and POD (b) in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Effect of ABA, PP333, and SA on SOD (a) and POD (b) in P. talassica × P. euphratica under control and 2% SSc stress conditions. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 13 01864 g007
Table 1. Settings for various treatment combinations.
Table 1. Settings for various treatment combinations.
TreatmentSoil Salt Content(SSc)Plant Growth Regulators(PGRs)
CK0.11%-
NaCl2%-
A12%5 mg·L−1 ABA
A22%15 mg·L−1 ABA
A32%25 mg·L−1 ABA
P12%300 mg·L−1 PP333
P22%900 mg·L−1 PP333
P32%1500 mg·L−1 PP333
S12%40 mg·L−1 SA
S22%120 mg·L−1 SA
S32%200 mg·L−1 SA
Table 2. Comprehensive evaluation of the salt tolerance of P. talassica × P. euphratica after spraying seedlings with different exogenous regulators.
Table 2. Comprehensive evaluation of the salt tolerance of P. talassica × P. euphratica after spraying seedlings with different exogenous regulators.
IndexMembership Function ValueWeight of Indicators %
CKNaClA1A2A3P1P2P3S1S2S3
Dry weight0.880.010.250.750.450.240.690.490.330.760.568.96%
Root length0.990.050.210.630.420.410.750.560.430.850.578.70%
Root surface area0.790.070.150.510.330.330.660.390.430.790.638.37%
Root volume0.980.030.230.710.440.370.770.560.290.890.628.93%
Chl0.780.030.300.690.510.190.690.450.230.670.488.82%
Pn0.840.090.380.690.430.270.790.510.340.770.558.92%
Gs0.870.070.210.770.380.400.780.530.290.830.618.90%
Tr0.950.110.370.850.580.280.900.480.320.860.608.88%
MDA0.910.160.380.680.610.610.930.550.340.670.698.19%
H2O20.920.200.410.850.590.390.740.580.400.800.558.80%
O20.970.270.440.890.610.370.920.630.410.900.658.89%
Pro0.020.350.490.720.570.520.800.650.550.870.661.86%
SOD0.080.580.690.890.780.700.920.800.710.930.820.06%
POD0.050.450.570.910.770.510.910.770.710.960.871.73%
Weighted average0.870.110.310.730.490.360.790.530.360.800.60
Ranking1111047836825
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, M.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Han, Z. Abscisic Acid, Paclobutrazol, and Salicylic Acid Alleviate Salt Stress in Populus talassica × Populus euphratica by Modulating Plant Root Architecture, Photosynthesis, and the Antioxidant Defense System. Forests 2022, 13, 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111864

AMA Style

Su M, Zhang M, Liu Y, Han Z. Abscisic Acid, Paclobutrazol, and Salicylic Acid Alleviate Salt Stress in Populus talassica × Populus euphratica by Modulating Plant Root Architecture, Photosynthesis, and the Antioxidant Defense System. Forests. 2022; 13(11):1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Mengxu, Min Zhang, Ying Liu, and Zhanjiang Han. 2022. "Abscisic Acid, Paclobutrazol, and Salicylic Acid Alleviate Salt Stress in Populus talassica × Populus euphratica by Modulating Plant Root Architecture, Photosynthesis, and the Antioxidant Defense System" Forests 13, no. 11: 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop