Next Article in Journal
The Highly Accurate Interatomic Potential of CsPbBr3 Perovskite with Temperature Dependence on the Structure and Thermal Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Multiwall Rectangular Plates under Transverse Pressure—A Non-Linear Experimental and Numerical Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proportioning Factors of Alkali-Activated Materials and Interaction Relationship Revealed by Response Surface Modeling

1
Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
2
School of Materials Science & Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(5), 2042; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052042
Submission received: 3 February 2023 / Revised: 26 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

:
Alkali-activated fly-ash–slag blending materials (AA-FASMs) are gradually being studied and applied more because of their good performance. There are many factors affecting the alkali-activated system, and the effect of single-factor variation on the performance of AA-FASM has been mostly reported; however, there is a lack of unified understanding of the mechanical properties and microstructure of AA-FASM under curing conditions and multiple-factor interaction. Therefore, this study investigated the compressive strength development and reaction products of alkali-activated AA-FASM under three curing conditions including seal (S), dry (D) and water saturation (W). Based on the response surface model, the relationship between the interaction of slag content (WSG), activator modulus (M) and activator dosage (RA) on its strength was established. The results showed that the maximum compressive strength of AA-FASM after 28 days of sealed curing was about 59 MPa, while the strengths of dry- and water-saturation-cured specimens decreased by 9.8% and 13.7%, respectively. The seal-cured samples also had the smallest mass change rate and linear shrinkage and the most compact pore structure. Due to the adverse effects from a too-high or too-low modulus and dosage of the activators, the shapes of upward convex, slope and inclined convex were under the interaction of WSG/M, WSG/RA and M/RA, respectively. The correlation coefficient R2 > 0.95 and p-value < 0.05 indicated that the proposed model could be used to predict strength development given the complex factors. Optimal proportioning and curing conditions were found to be WSG = 50%, M = 1.4, RA = 50% and sealed curing.

1. Introduction

The CO2 emissions generated from cement production account for 5–7% of the total CO2 emissions in the world [1]. With the increasing demand for cement in developing countries, the total CO2 emissions are still rising, which has become one of the major factors initiating the global temperature rise and climate warming [2,3]. The research on modern building materials has focused on the development of green cementitious materials with a low carbon footprint. Compared with ordinary Portland cement (OPC), the manufacture of alkali-activated cement products can reduce carbon emissions by 26~45%, which has been considered a potential alternative source of OPC [4].
The main raw materials for the manufacture of alkali-activated cement include aluminum-rich silicate materials such as metakaolin and fly ash, which are dominated by geopolymerization, and calcium-rich materials such as slag [5]. Low-polymerization-degree silicate ion ([SiO(OH)3]) and aluminate ion ([Al(OH)4]) undergo a polycondensation reaction under alkaline conditions, and the reaction product formed in alkali-activated fly ash (FA) is an aluminosilicate-type gel with a three-dimensional network structure [6]. Meanwhile, C-(A)-S-H gel with Ca/Si ratios (0.8−1.1) is usually obtained from the alkali-activated slag [7,8].
In recent decades, raw materials for manufacturing alkali-activated cement have been changed from natural minerals to industrial by-products [9,10], such as alkali-activated fly-ash–slag materials (AA-FASMs). The performances of AA-FASM are significantly affected by the proportion of the binder, modulus and dosage of the activator, curing conditions and other factors [11,12,13,14,15,16]. For instance, Nath et al. [12] showed that the setting time and strength were significantly reduced due to the increased slag content in AA-FASM. Lee et al. [17] pointed out that the increase in the modulus (M) of water glass (Na2O·nSiO2) from 0.5 to 1.0 decreased the compressive strength by 28.9%, which was due to the reduction in the alkalinity of the alkali activator. Moreover, Oderji et al. [18] investigated the effect of solid sodium silicate activator dosage on the geopolymer microstructure under a constant fly ash/slag ratio and observed that the microstructure became more homogeneous with the increase in sodium silicate dosage (mass ratio) from 7% to 8%.
Curing conditions also have an important impact on the performance and microstructure of cementitious materials [16,19]. Fluctuation in curing humidity will cause a change in water content in the paste. Huang et al. [20] demonstrated that a sealed-curing condition could mitigate the leaching of OH and other ions from the alkali-activated materials and thus maintain high alkalinity in the matrix. Mastali et al. [21] observed that under low humidity, drying shrinkage was intensified due to the evaporation of a large amount of unbound water that existed in alkali-activated materials. Compared with OPC, the shrinkage dynamics of alkali-activated slag (AAS) are more easily affected by the change in relative humidity (RH) and will exhibit the characteristics of hysteresis shrinkage [22]. In addition, there is also a strong relationship between efflorescence and humidity [23]. The reaction process of efflorescence is shown in the following formulas:
CO2(g) + 2OH(aq)→CO32−(aq) + H2O
2Na+(aq) + CO32− + 7H2O→Na2CO3·7H2O(s)
Although alkali-activated materials have excellent mechanical strength and durability [11], the common “single-factor” research cannot reflect the potential interaction between various factors. The setting time, strength and other properties of AA-FASM cannot be predicted easily. Therefore, it is important to study the influence of these factors and curing conditions on the properties of AA-FASM.
In this paper, the effects of curing conditions on the basic mechanical properties and product microstructure of AA-FASM were systematically studied. On this basis, the response surface model was introduced into the mix design. The response surface models for the compressive strength of AA-FASM under the condition of interaction factors were also established, and the mechanism behind this model was further discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Industrial solid waste can replace Portland cement as a cementitious material. The spherical particle fly ash produced in the coal-burning process of thermal power plants mainly contains aluminosilicate components and has an annual output of 900 million tons [2]. Slag is produced by smelting pig iron and is a potentially active mineral material. At present, although slag is only partially used in the production of cement and concrete, it can also achieve green energy saving and low carbon in the construction industry [13]. A large amount of industrial solid waste needs to be stored and treated to avoid serious environmental problems. Alkali-activated material is a new form of solid-waste utilization, and fly ash and slag activated by alkaline solution are beneficial to improve the utilization rate of solid waste. The mixture of fly ash and slag may solve the problems of low activity of fly ash and rapid set of alkali-activated slag and will further expand its engineering application prospects [17]. The chemical composition and loss on ignition of fly ash and slag used in the experiment are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the mineral composition of fly ash and slag, which have distinct quartz and mullite crystals in fly ash and an amorphous phase with a hump mainly between 20 and 35° in slag. Fly ash has a high percentage of SiO2 and Al2O3 oxides, while slag has a calcium oxide percentage of 38.25%. Commercially available sodium silicate solution was used in this study, with the composition of 32.35% SiO2, 13.73% Na2O and 53.92% water, which has a 2.43 mass ratio of SiO2 to Na2O. Required alkali activator (constant solid content of 40%, different activator modulus (1.0, 1.4 and 1.8)) was prepared by mixing the flake sodium hydroxide solid (≥99% purity), water and sodium silicate solution, which was then cooled to room temperature (>4 h) before using.

2.2. Experimental Design

AA-FASM was manufactured with constant activator modulus, different slag content and activator dosage under the three curing conditions. Meanwhile, the proportions of slag (WSG = m (slag)/m (slag + fly ash)), the modulus of alkali activator (M = n (SiO2)/n (Na2O)) and the ratio of alkali activator to binding material (RA = m (alkali activator)/m (slag + fly ash)) were selected as factors in the establishment of response surface model, and their corresponding levels and design scheme are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. In order to simplify and unify, the mixing ratio numbers under the three curing conditions adopted were the same as those in the surface model, namely B5, B6, B7, B8 and B13 in Table 3.
The response surface model was established to verify the interaction on the basis of exploring the effects of seal-, dry- and water-saturation-curing conditions on the mechanical properties and microstructure of AA-FASM. Response surface method (RSM) is a conditional optimization method, which is suitable for solving nonlinear data. After the factors and levels were determined, the mathematical model between response value and variables was established according to the optimization of the experimental design and the analysis of the quadratic regression equation. As a result, the optimal parameters could be obtained through the regression equation and analysis [24]. In this paper, Box–Behnken design was used as the experimental design method.

2.3. Preparation of Specimens

The pre-mixed fly-ash–slag powder was placed in NJ-160A planetary mixer to dry-mix for 1 min to ensure homogeneity, and the alkali activator was then added into the mixer. After the mixture was stirred for 240 s, which was poured into the mold (cylinder with a diameter of 29 mm and a height of 40 mm) four times and was vibrated 50 times on the NLD-3 cement mortar fluidity meter after each pouring, 6 replicates in each group were used for testing compressive strength. The temperature of three curing conditions was controlled at 20 ± 2 °C, and each specimen was wrapped with film for seal curing and tested for strength for 1 day, 3 days and 28 days, respectively. In terms of dry curing, the relative humidity was 55%; for water-saturation condition, the container needed to be sealed with a film when the specimens were cured in water (only tested 28-day compressive strength).

2.4. Test Method

2.4.1. Compressive Strength

The “Method of testing cements-Determination of strength” [25] was used to test the compressive strength of specimens. The average value of strength obtained for each group of 6 specimens was used, and the error was controlled within 10%.

2.4.2. Mass Changes

To determine the mass change rate of AA-FASM under different curing conditions, at least 3 specimens in each group were tested, and each specimen was tested at least twice. There, mass average was used. An analytical balance (accurate to four decimal places) was used to weigh the mass at each curing period, and the rate of mass change was calculated according to Equation (1):
M L = m i m 0 m 0 × 100 %
where ML and mi are the rate of mass change (%) and mass (g) in each stage, respectively, and m0 is the initial mass, g.

2.4.3. Linear Shrinkage

The measurement of shrinkage change was carried out in a comparative study under different curing conditions. Each group had at least 3 specimens, and each specimen was tested at least twice. Vernier caliper (accurate to two decimal places) was adopted to measure the linear shrinkage, and then, the linear shrinkage rate was calculated according to Equation (2):
L S = L i L 0 L 0 × 100 %
where Ls and Li are the rate of linear shrinkage (%) and shrinkage value (mm), respectively, and L0 is the initial length, mm.

2.4.4. XRD Analysis

The mineral composition of alkali-activated materials was determined with D/max-2500 X-ray diffraction (XRD) instrument (Rigaku, Japan). The testing parameters were set as follows: copper target (Cu kα), working voltage 40 kV, working current 100 Ma, 2θ from 5° to 70° and the pace 2.4°/min.

2.4.5. FT-IR Analysis

The reaction process of AA-FASM with different ratios under three curing conditions was analyzed by using Nicolet 6700 FT-IR, and the scanning range was 400~4000 cm−1.

2.4.6. Pore Structure

Based on the principle that the signal quantity of NMR is directly proportional to the quantity of liquid water in the specimen and the ratio between the volume of liquid water to the volume of specimen is the porosity, 1H NMR test was carried out on the water-saturated specimen obtained by the negative pressure treatment of water-saturated instrument for 24 h. The volume of water-saturated specimen was determined according to the buoyancy method before testing, and the porosity and pore size distribution were obtained with MesoMR23-060V-1 nuclear magnetic resonance detection equipment.

2.4.7. BSE Morphology

The specimen was broken down into the largest side length of approximately 5 mm. After vacuum drying, the sample was sealed with epoxy resin, waiting until the resin hardened. A polished machine was used to obtain a smooth surface. The high-resolution backscatter image of specimen was obtained with a Zeiss GeminiSEM 500 Schottky field emission scanning electron microscope, and the average Ca/Si was calculated by EDS element analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Curing Conditions on Performance, Product and Microstructure

3.1.1. Compressive Strength

Figure 2 shows the effect of curing conditions on the compressive strengths of AA-FASM cured for 28 days. The results indicate that the water-saturation condition may have a detrimental effect on the geopolymerization of the sample with a high content of fly ash. Although there were no obvious cracks in the samples, the compressive strengths of B5 and B6 decreased by 32.4% and 50.6%, respectively, when compared with the sealed-curing samples. On the contrary, dry curing with low humidity (55% RH) causes internal moisture exchange and microcracks in AA-FASM [26], especially for the compressive strength of B6 (RA = 55%), which was remarkedly reduced by 50.3%. In addition, S-B7 reached about 59 MPa, while D-B7 and W-B7 decreased, respectively, by 9.8% and 13.7%. Seal curing improves the strength and compactness of the specimens, whether they are single- or high-calcium-component alkali-activated materials [27]. The higher water content is free and can flow within the pore while present in the low-calcium-based system [28], while there may be a lower pH and leaching of the activator during an early water-curing condition [27]. High-humidity environments have side effects on the product structure, weakening the microstructural properties of alkali-activated materials [29,30].
Another change to note is that the strength of the sample with RA = 55% (B6 or B8) was lower than that of the sample with RA = 45% (B5 or B7), which may be related to the water content of the system. In the several stages of the reaction of water and alkali-activated material, water can be used as a medium to dissolve the reactant or as a product [31]. Excessive moisture can hinder the improvement of compressive strength. As shown in the following formula, water is precipitated when polycondensation occurs:
SiO ( OH ) 2 + AlOOH     HO Si | O O Al + H 2 O
Sealed curing led to the highest compressive strengths of AA-FASM, and the ratio with WSG < 50% and RA > 50% was not suitable for curing in a water-saturation and dry environment.

3.1.2. Mass Change Rate

The effect of three curing conditions on the mass change rates of AA-FASM is shown in Figure 3. The mass changes were directly influenced by the reactivity of raw material and the water content in the matrix. An increase in slag content and a decrease in activator dosage significantly reduced the mass loss of dry-cured samples. The early-age reaction of fly ash was slow, resulting in a large increase in RA = 45% or 55%, and the decrease in mass change was most prominent with B6 (WSG = 25%, RA = 55%), up to 6.6% (Figure 3a). In contrast to dry curing, the mass of water-saturation-cured samples increased with curing age. The samples with a higher content of fly ash (W-B5, W-B6) had larger water absorption (>2.1%), and the mass increase rate of RA = 55% was lower than RA = 45% (Figure 3b). In addition, as seen in Figure 3c, the sealing-cured sample maintained a relatively constant mass due to less humidity exchange occurring with the outside. The three curing conditions have their own distinct characteristics and are different from each other. It is worth noting that the loss of water and the increase in humidity will cause greater fluctuations in the mass and strength of AA-FASM.

3.1.3. Linear Shrinkage

Figure 4 shows the effect of the curing condition on the linear shrinkage of AA-FASM, where negative values represent shrinkage. The linear shrinkage under dry curing corresponds well with the mass change rate. The loss of water increased with the content of capillary pores in the matrix, so the drying shrinkage was larger. High contents of fly ash and the alkali activator are not suitable for the dry-curing samples, such as B6 (WSG = 25%, RA = 55%). The linear shrinkage was up to about 2.6%, and the microcracks occurred easily and caused reductions in strength. Sealed curing created a barrier of water exchange with the external drying environment, and only self-shrinkage caused by the chemical reaction was present in AA-FASM, as shown in Figure 4b. Furthermore, the high-humidity condition does not cause the appearance of the capillary meniscus in the paste and thus reduces the possibility of capillary pressure [32], so there was no change in the shrinkage value (see Figure 4c). Combining the changes in mass change rate and linear shrinkage, the loss of water has a greater impact on compressive strength than the surplus of water.

3.1.4. XRD Analysis

Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns of AA-FASM samples under different curing conditions. There was a wide hump present at 20°~38°, which was associated with the product of N-A-S-H with an amorphous structure. The 2θ at the center of the hum was around 30°, which was the main sign of N-A-S-H gel generation in other studies of fly-ash-based geopolymers [33]. Regardless of the curing condition, the incorporation of slag promoted the formation of a C-A-S-H gel phase. Studies have shown that C-S-H gel can be formed quickly in the early stage of the reaction, which accelerates the dissolution of Si and Al in fly ash and slag, promotes the reaction and accelerates the generation of N-A-S-H gel as a nucleation site, which also makes the matrix more compact [34,35].

3.1.5. FT-IR Analysis

Figure 6 shows the FT-IR spectrum of AA-FASM under different curing conditions. The peak of the absorption band of the product shifted to a low wave number with the increase in slag content, as shown in Figure 6a,b. The range of 3450~3700 cm−1 is related to the stretching vibration band of H−OH and the bending vibration of the H−OH bond at 1640~1650 cm−1, which can be attributed to the presence of bound water present in the alkali-activated products [36,37].
The peak at 992 cm−1 represents the stretching vibration of Si-O of the SiO4 tetrahedron, indicating the formation of C-A-S-H gel [38]. Moreover, the asymmetric stretching vibration of T-O-Si (T = Si or Al) in the range of 1300~800 cm−1 corresponds to the structural units of silicon-oxygen tetrahedron ([SiO4]4−) and aluminum-oxygen tetrahedron ([AlO4]5−) in N-A-S-H gel phase [39]. Under the same sealed-curing conditions, the peak of C-S-H gel changes sharply with the increase in the slag content. Figure 6c shows the FT-IR spectrum of B13 (i.e., WSG = 50%, M = 1.4, RA = 50%). The peak of T-O-Si shifted to the low wave number (1004 cm−1 to 993 cm−1), indicating that although AA-FASM under different curing conditions had the same reaction products, the sealing condition was more favorable for sufficient reaction.

3.1.6. Pore Structure

The pore size distribution curves of AA-FASM samples under the sealed-curing conditions are shown in Figure 7. At the curing age of 3 days, the pore size was mostly distributed in the range of 10 and 500 nm regardless of the content of fly ash (B5, B6) or slag (B7, B8 and B13). In contrast, the pore size of B7, B8 and B13 was mainly concentrated in the range of 10~100 nm at 28 days. Table 4 shows the porosity of AA-FASM at different ages adopted with sealed curing. It can be found that the B7 (WSG = 75%, RA = 45%) cured for 3 and 28 days exhibits the minimum porosity, which was 3.523% and 1.360%, respectively. Compared with the 3-day cured samples, the porosity of B5, B6, B7, B8 and B13 decreased by 47.67%, 27.29%, 61.40%, 51.25% and 65.14% at 28 days, respectively. In general, the reactivity of slag is higher than that of fly ash at room temperature. Due to the accumulation effect of particles and the coexistence of alkali-activated reaction products (C-S-H and N-A-S-H), the pore structure of the alkali-activated fly-ash–slag material is significantly refined and improved with the increase in curing age [40].
Figure 8 shows the comparison of the pore size distribution of AA-FASM under sealed- and water-saturation-curing conditions. At the age of 28 days, for the samples of S-B7 and S-B13 with WSG > 50% and RA ≤ 50%, the pore size gradually decreased due to the continuous formation of C-S-H gel and was mainly concentrated in the range of 10~100 nm. According to the reaction mechanism of geopolymerization, it can be known that the water-saturation curing with high humidity would hinder the reaction in the later period. The looser pore structure formed in the water-saturation-cured samples was large, and the pore size also varied from 10 nm to 500 nm.
The porosity of the S-B7 sample was approximately 5.35 times lower than the W-B7 (7.278%) sample cured for 28 days. Furthermore, the porosities of the S-B5 and S-B13 samples were also 2.92 and 3.99 times lower than the W-B5 and W-B13 samples, respectively (see Figure 9). The figure indicated that the pore structure of AA-FASM paste is mainly composed of small capillary pores, accompanied by a small amount of large capillary pores. The proportion of pores in the range of 0~200 nm accounts for more than 70% of the total porosity, and the pores in the range of 0–50 nm account for 39.5–58.4% of the total porosity. A decrease in the volume and size of pores and an increase in compressive strength are attributed to the addition of slag, decreased activator dosage and sealed-curing condition. However, water-saturation curing is not beneficial for geopolymerization and dry curing prone to initiate microcracks.

3.1.7. BSE Morphology

S-B5 and S-B7 had a typical microstructure of AA-FASM, which was composed of the gel phase and unreacted fly ash and slag remnants embedded in the matrix (see Figure 10). There was a large number of unreacted fly ash particles (1–40 μm) in S-B5. The surface of fly ash remnants was corroded by alkali. A few of the fly ash spheres maintained a relatively complete particle morphology. For the S-B7 sample with 75% slag content, the gel phase contained more unreacted slag remnants and a smaller amount of fly ash remnants; compared with S-B5, its gel phase was more homogeneous. The main product formed in the sample with a high slag content is C-S-H or C-A-S-H type gel, thus macroscopic compressive strength is improved.
Figure 11 shows the BSE morphology of the B-5 and B-7 samples after 28 days of dry and water-saturation curing. Regardless of the change in curing conditions, the morphology of AA-FASM was similar, and many obvious unreacted remnants were present in the matrix. However, the difference was that the morphology of the specimen placed in the water was relatively loose. In addition to water-saturation curing, the boundaries between the unreacted remnants and the gel matrix were clear. Under the curing conditions with high humidity, microcracks developed in the gel phase and the residual particles. On the one hand, the microcracking development was related to the shrinkage of drying and to water loss using an oven. On the other hand, it may be due to the leaching of alkaline ions from the matrix, and the formation of pores due to leaching leads to the large porosity of the water-saturation-cured sample.
In the BSE images, the C-S-H and N-A-S-H gel phases cannot be clearly distinguished. By calculating the average Ca/Si ratios of the gel phase (see Table 5), it was found that with the increase in the slag content, the average Ca/Si exhibited an increasing trend up to 0.7581. The sequence of average Ca/Si ratios presented in the samples with different curing conditions was sealing > drying > water saturation, indicating that the isolation of external moisture exchange during curing can promote the formation of the gel phase. Higher humidity in water-saturation curing inhibits the polycondensation of silicate and aluminate monomers and hinders the formation of network-structured aluminosilicate gels [41]. For the sample with dry curing, the reduction in moisture causes cracking and weakens the participation of water in the alkali activation process [31]; as a consequence, compressive strength development is impaired. In contrast, sealed curing promotes the microstructure of AA-FASM products to be more homogeneous and compact.
Based on the results of AA-FASM under the sealed-curing condition, the response surface models of the compressive strength of AA-FASM under the interaction factors are also established, and the mechanism behind this model is further discussed. The purpose of establishing a model is to predict performance change trends such as compressive strength and choose an appropriate parameter range.

3.2. Establishment of Response Surface

3.2.1. Test Results

Table 6 shows the comparison of compressive strength, cracks, initial setting and final setting time of 17 groups of sealed-curing samples. No cracks (N), fewer cracks (L) and more cracks (M) were used to describe the numbers of microcracks. The microcracks in AA-FASM samples were remarkedly influenced by WSG, M and RA. For instance, when the slag content was 75%, the shortest initial and final setting time was 50 min and 74 min, respectively. However, the longest initial and final setting time occurred, which was 317 min and 416 min, respectively, at the ratio of 25% slag.

3.2.2. Second-Order Response Model

A mathematical model is established to explore the influence of interaction on strength development [42,43], as shown in Formula (4).
Y = β 0 + i = 1 k β i χ i + i j k β i j χ i χ j + i = 1 k β i i χ i 2 + ε
where Y is the predicted value; β0, βi, βii and βij are constant and regression coefficients, respectively; χi and χj are variable factors; and ε is the systematic error. The second-order response surface models of compressive strength R and WSG (represented by A), M (represented by B) and RA (represented by C) are established as follows:
R 1 = 383.25538 + 2.30118 × A + 14.08375 × B 16.66 × C 0.31325 × A × B 0.017280 × A × C 0.19125 × B × C 5.7568 × 10 3 × A 2 + 2.18437 × B 2 + 0.17128 × C 2
R 3 = 126.35176 + 1.2629 × A + 46.42925 × B 5.8466 × C + 0.0985 × A × B 6.36 × 10 3 × A × C 0.94875 × B × C 6.62296 × 10 3 × A 2 2.10531 × B 2 + 0.066726 × C 2
R 28 = 114.18325 + 1.26751 × A + 26.07063 × B 3.28125 × C 0.017 × A × B 0.02154 × A × C + 0.57375 × B × C 1.2296 × 10 3 × A 2 19.99063 × B 2 + 0.02136 × C 2

3.2.3. Significance Test

The variance analysis of the second-order response surface model is given in Table 7, and the correlation coefficient R2 and p-Value are used to analyze the significance of the response model of compressive strength.
The results show that the R2 of the strength models at three curing ages was 0.9882, 0.9942 and 0.9659, and the p-Value of models was less than 0.05, indicating that the response surface model was significant and could be applied to the prediction of the compressive strength of AA-FASM paste.

3.2.4. Response Surface

(1)
Interaction of WSG/M
The effect of the interaction between the slag content WSG and activator modulus M on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM is shown in Figure 12. From 1 to 28 days, the response surface of compressive strength exhibited three stages of change: protruding corner, rising arc-shaped and upward convex surface. The early strength was not affected by M (when WSG ≤ 50%), and the basic trend of a rising arc-shaped surface at 3 days did not change with the increase in WSG and M. At the early 1-day and 3-day curing ages, the increase in slag content significantly increased the CaO/(SiO2+Al2O3) ratio from 0.13 to 0.44, regardless of the modulus of 1.0,1.4 or 1.8, which led to the rise of the surface. At 28 days, no matter the amount of slag, the strength surface was convex. As shown in Figure 12c, the CaO/(SiO2+Al2O3) ratios of the four endpoints at the corners of the surface were 0.131, 0.136, 0.418 and 0.436, respectively. Although the ratio difference between the endpoints was 0.3, the compressive strength of the four endpoints was lower than that of the center point. It also indicated that a high or low modulus will hinder the development of geopolymer strength. In addition, similar to the AA-FASM, the activated slag system, explored by Gao et al. [43], is prominently influenced by the activator modulus.
The shape change of the response surface may be related to Ca2+ content in the alkali-activated system [12] and the activity of the water glass activator [44]. The increased slag content promotes the increase in Ca2+ concentration during alkali dissolution, where C-S-H acted as a nucleation site for the formation of N-A-S-H [35]. In addition, water glass (sodium silicate) with a high modulus has low reactivity due to the characteristics of high viscosity, a low number of monopolymers and a high polymerization degree of silicon-oxygen tetrahedron, while the activator with a low modulus presents an opposite trend [44]. The report [31] pointed out that when the modulus is M = 3.0, the polymerized structural units of [SiO4]4- in water glass are mostly Q3 (layered or chain), Q2 (chain) and Q1 (dimer), when M = 1.5, Q0 (monomer) increases and Q3 decreases in quantity, and its activity increases. Too-high and too-low moduli are not good for geopolymerization.
(2)
Interaction of WSG/RA
The effect of the interaction between the slag content WSG and activator dosage RA on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM is shown in Figure 13. The compressive strength surfaces from 1 to 28 days show similar slope growth, but at 28 days, there is a significant difference of about 37% between the predicted strengths of RA = 45% and RA = 55% (WSG = 75%). Under the same slag content, specimens with low CaO/(SiO2+Al2O3) in the alkali-activated system tended to have a low compressive strength distribution, which can also be reflected by the size of the alkaline solution content, such as B8 less than B7 strength with CaO/(SiO2+Al2O3) of 0.432.
The influence of RA in the early ages was not obvious, which was similar to the literature [45]. The interaction between WSG and RA promoted the compressive strength of AA-FASM to increase with the increase in slag content and the decrease in activator dosage, and this phenomenon is also reflected in Figure 2. The slope growth is mainly related to the degree of slag and fly ash activated by the alkaline solution [44]. In this experiment, RA in the range of 45~55% did not cause an adverse effect due to excessive alkalinity. Furthermore, for an alkali activator with a high dosage, there is a relatively large amount of water, and an increase in water content will be detrimental to the geopolymerization [41]. Similarly, there was also an increase in mass loss (Figure 3a) and linear shrinkage (Figure 4a) caused by the high dosage of the activator. Although the interaction between WSG and RA does not cause complex changes in the response surface of compressive strength, it still shows obvious trend changes.
(3)
Interaction of M/RA
The effect of the interaction between the activator modulus M and activator dosage RA on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM is shown in Figure 14. Due to the disadvantage of the high alkalinity of the alkali-activated reaction and the relatively high proportion of water in a large activator dosage, the strength model under the interaction changes from the gentle concave after 1-day curing to an inclined convex surface after 28-day curing. Compared with WSG/M and WSG/RA, the differences between the predicted values of compressive strength under the interaction of M/RA were relatively small. The good adaptability of the response surface was verified by the analysis of variance or the evolution of surface shape, which was helpful for the selection of parameters for the preparation of AA-FASM.

3.2.5. Selection of Parameter

Figure 15 shows the fracture states of B5 (75% fly ash) and B7 (75% slag) of AA-FASM after the compressive strength test. The brittleness and flaky structure were associated with a high slag content; in contrast, the high content of the fly ash sample was relatively complete. When the AA-FASM with a high slag content was compressed, a sudden fracture appeared when the peak load was reached. Therefore, in the selection of mix parameters, the maximum strength should not be pursued alone, but the damage characteristics should also be considered to improve the safety of engineering applications.
Figure 16 shows the comparison of the cracks between B1 and B3. Compared with B1 (WSG = 25%) without cracks, a denser curve or arc crack network appeared on the surface of B3 (WSG = 75%). The presence of microcracks indicated that it has great shrinkage sensitivity. It is generally believed that the hardened paste of the alkali-activated material is mainly composed of gels [36,46], which give it higher compressive strength but also higher shrinkage. Reference [47] also points out that the large shrinkage of sodium silicate-activated slag is associated with the dehydration of silica gel with a high water content or silica-rich gel products.
Combining the basic mechanical properties, microstructure and response surface models and cracking characteristics of AA-FASM, it was recommended that the optimal proportioning parameters and curing condition be selected as follows: slag content WSG = 50%, activator modulus M = 1.4, activator dosage RA = 50% and the seal-curing condition.
The high-correlation regression model showed that the response surface method can be used to predict the compressive strength of mixtures, which was similar to the results of the studies [43,48,49]. Other researchers have also evaluated the possibility of alkali-activated materials prepared by using the response surface analysis method for backfill, sidewalk slabs and the rapid repair of backfill and runways [43,48] and demonstrated their feasibility. It should be noted that the model in this work cannot be used as a unified model of alkali-activated materials, and the mechanical properties of the final product depend on the properties of raw materials in different regions. However, the related model is still an effective method to optimize the final product properties of alkali-activated materials. This research contributes to the production of sustainable alkali-activated concrete using locally available materials and provides data support for the future development of integrated prediction models.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the effects of seal, dry and water-saturation curing on the performance and microstructure of alkali-activated fly-ash–slag materials were studied. Meanwhile, the interactions among the factors of slag content, activator modulus and dosage were verified by using the response surface model. The main conclusions of this study can be drawn as follows:
(1)
The compressive strength is up to 59 MPa after 28 days of sealed curing, while the strengths of the group with the same mix proportion under drying and water-saturation curing decrease by 9.8% and 13.7%, respectively. Sealed curing locks the water within the system, so the sample has the smallest mass loss, linear shrinkage, total porosity and refined pore size.
(2)
The correlation coefficients of the response surface models for the AA-FASMs cured for 1 day, 3 days and 28 days are both higher than 0.95, and the p-values are all less than 0.05. These results show that compressive strength can be predicted precisely using the response surface method.
(3)
The slag content WSG, activator modulus M and activator dosage RA have significant effects on the strength development of AA-FASM. Because of the interaction of WSG/M, the response surface experiences a change in shape from a protruding corner, rising arc-shaped to convex surface. The response surface under the interaction of WSG/RA is mainly characterized by slope growth, while the interaction surface of M/RA shows a transition from a concave to a convex shape.
(4)
In the studied range of factors, the optimal mix proportion parameter and curing conditions of AA-FASM are slag content of 50%, activator modulus of 1.4, activator dosage of 50% and sealed curing.

Author Contributions

Investigation, J.Z., B.L., Y.C., R.M., H.X. and Y.J.; Writing—original draft, J.Z. and B.L.; Writing—review&editing, J.Z., A.W., B.L., K.L., Y.C., R.M., H.X., Y.J. and D.S.; Funding acquisition, A.W., K.L. and D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278236, 52172013), the Key Research and Development Projects in Anhui Province (202004b11020033, 202104a07020018), the Cultivation Project of Scientific Research Reserve of Anhui Jianzhu University (2021XMK02) and the Excellent Scientific Research and Innovation Team of Universities in Anhui Province (2022AH010017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, N.; Middendorf, B. Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overviews. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 237, 117455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, Y.; Lu, B.; Bai, T.; Wang, H.; Du, F.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, L.; Jiang, C.; Wang, W. Geopolymer, green alkali activated cementitious material: Synthesis, applications and challenges. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 224, 930–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yamchelou, M.; Law, D.; Patnaikuni, I.; Li, J. Alkali activation of mechanically activated low grade clay. J. Sustain. Cem. Based Mater. 2020, 10, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Haberta, G.; de Lacaillerieb, J.E.; Roussela, N. An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: Reviewing current research trends. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marvila, M.; Azevedo, A.; Matos, P.; Monteiro, S.N.; Vieira, C.M.F. Rheological and the Fresh State Properties of Alkali-Activated Mortars by Blast Furnace Slag. Materials 2021, 14, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nath, S.K.; Maitra, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Kumar, S. Microstructural and morphological evolution of fly ash based geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 111, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haha, M.B.; Le Saout, G.; Winnefeld, F.; Lothenbach, B. Influence of activator type on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of alkali activated blast-furnace slags. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, N.; Lee, H. Reactivity and reaction products of alkali-activated, fly ash/slag paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 81, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuri, J.C.; Khan MN, N.; Sarker, P.K. Workability, strength and microstructural properties of ground ferronickel slag blended fly ash geopolymer mortar. J. Sustain. Cem. Based Mater. 2022, 11, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wongsa, A.; Wongkvanklom, A.; Tanangteerapong, D.; Chindaprasirt, P. Comparative study of fire-resistant behaviors of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer mortar containing zeolite and mullite. J. Sustain. Cem. Based Mater. 2020, 9, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Farhanad, K.; Johari, M.M.; Demirboğabc, R. Assessment of important parameters involved in the synthesis of geopolymer composites: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 264, 120276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nath, P.; Sarker, P. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 66, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hu, X.; Shi, C.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, L. Compressive strength, pore structure and chloride transport properties of alkali-activated slag/fly ash mortars. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 104, 103392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Firdous, R.; Stephan, D. Impact of the mineralogical composition of natural pozzolan on properties of resultant geopolymers. J. Sustain. Cem. Based Mater. 2020, 10, 149–164. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ye, H.; Radlińska, A. Fly ash-slag interaction during alkaline activation: Influence of activators on phase assemblage and microstructure formation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 122, 594–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Guo, W.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, Y.; Xue, C.; Bai, Y.; Shi, Y. Effects of various curing methods on the compressive strength and microstructure of blast furnace slag-fly ash-based cementitious material activated by alkaline solid wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 357, 129397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, N.; Lee, H. Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 1201–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oderji, S.Y.; Chen, B.; Ahmad, M.R.; Shah, S.F.A. Fresh and hardened properties of one-part fly ash-based geopolymer binders cured at room temperature: Effect of slag and alkali activators. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 225, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sukontasukkul, P.; Chindaprasirt, P.; Pongsopha, P.; Phoo-Ngernkham, T.; Tangchirapat, W.; Banthia, N. Effect of fly ash/silica fume ratio and curing condition on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced geopolymer. J. Sustain. Cem. Based Mater. 2020, 9, 218–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, G.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Hou, Z. The influence of curing methods on the strength of MSWI bottom ash-based alkali-activated mortars: The role of leaching of OH and free alkali. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 186, 978–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mastali, M.; Kinnunen, P.; Dalvand, A.; Firouz, R.M.; Illikainen, M. Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated binders—A critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 190, 533–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, H.; Radlińska, A. Shrinkage mechanisms of alkali-activated slag. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 88, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, Z.; Provis, J.; Reid, A. Fly ash-based geopolymers: The relationship between, composition, pore structure and efflorescence. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 64, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, X. Experimental Design Method; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  25. GB/T 17671-1999; Method of Testing Cements-Determination of Strength. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China.
  26. Huseien, G.; Mirza, J.; Ismail, M.; Hussin, M.W. Influence of different curing temperatures and alkali activators on properties of GBFS geopolymer mortars containing fly ash and palm-oil fuel ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 1229–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thomas, R.; Lezama, D.; Peethamparan, S. On drying shrinkage in alkali-activated concrete: Improving dimensional stability by aging or heat-curing. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 91, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bernal, S.A.; Van Deventer, J.S. Alkali Activated Materials-RILEM TC 224-AAM. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shen, J.; Li, Y.; Lin, H.; Lv, J.; Feng, S.; Ci, J. Early properties and microstructure evolution of alkali-activated brick powder geopolymers at varied curing humidity. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 54, 104674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nodehi, M.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Gholampour, A.; Mohammed, T.; Shi, X. The effect of curing regimes on physico-mechanical, microstructural and durability properties of alkali-activated materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 321, 126335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, N. Non-Tradition Cementitious Materials Chemistry. Wuhan University of Technology Press: Wuhan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, B.; Zhu, H.; Cheng, Y.; Huseien, G.F.; Shah, K.W. Shrinkage mechanisms and shrinkage-mitigating strategies of alkali-activated slag composites: A critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 318, 125993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Norton, M.; Provis, J. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 4, 2917–2933. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Mehrotra, S. Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer. J. Materials. Sci. 2010, 45, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Puligilla, S.; Mondal, P. Role of slag in microstructural development and hardening of fly ash-slag geopolymer. Cem. Concr. Res. 2013, 43, 70–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lecomte, I.; Henrist, C.; Liegeois, M.; Maseri, F.; Cloots, R. (Micro)-structural comparison between geopolymers, alkali-activated slag cement and Portland cement. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 3789–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. García-Lodeiro, I.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Blanco, M.; Palomo, A. FTIR study of the sol–gel synthesis of cementitious gels: C–S–H and N–A–S–H. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2008, 45, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Puertas, F.; Fernandez-Jimenez, A. Mineralogical and microstructural characterisation of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003, 25, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, T.; Yao, X.; Gu, G.; Zhu, H. Effect of slag on reaction and composition of alkali-activated fly ash-slag blends. J. Nanjing Tech Univ. 2015, 37, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhu, H.; Yao, X.; Zhang, Z. Effect of slag addition on alkali-activated process of metakaolin and performance of its product. Non-Met. Mines 2008, 31, 16–17. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Z.; Yao, X.; Zhu, H. Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 43, 218–223. [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang, H.; Shen, X.; Zheng, J. Modeling, analysis of interaction effects of several chemical additives on the strength development of silicate cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1937–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, Y.; Xu, J.; Luo, X.; Zhu, J.; Nie, L. Experiment research on mix design and early mechanical performance of alkali-activated slag using response surface methodology (RSM). Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 11666–11673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zheng, W.; Zhou, M.; Wang, Y. Literature review of alkali-activated cementitious materials. J. Build. Struct. 2019, 40, 28–39. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gao, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, G.; Fan, J. Response surface on early performance of alkali-activated slag binder. J. Build. Struct. 2016, 19, 209–213. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sakulich, A.R.; Miller, S.; Barsoum, M.W. Chemical and microstructural characterization of 20-month-old alkali-activated slag cements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 1741–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Krizan, D.; Zivanovic, B. Effects of dosage and modulus of water glass on early hydration of alkali–slag cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ahmad, S.; Bahraq, A.; Shaqraa, A.; Khalid, H.R.; Al-Gadhib, A.H.; Maslehuddin, M. Effects of key factors on the compressive strength of metakaolin and limestone powder-based alkali-activated concrete mixtures: An experimental and statistical study. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pinheiro, C.; Rios, S.; Fonseca, A. Application of the response surface method to optimize alkali activated cements based on low-reactivity ladle furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 264, 120271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD of raw materials.
Figure 1. XRD of raw materials.
Materials 16 02042 g001
Figure 2. Effect of curing conditions on the 28-day compressive strengths of AA-FASM.
Figure 2. Effect of curing conditions on the 28-day compressive strengths of AA-FASM.
Materials 16 02042 g002
Figure 3. Effect of three curing conditions on the mass change rate of AA-FASM. (a) Dry curing. (b) Water-saturation curing. (c) Mass change rates of B5 and B7.
Figure 3. Effect of three curing conditions on the mass change rate of AA-FASM. (a) Dry curing. (b) Water-saturation curing. (c) Mass change rates of B5 and B7.
Materials 16 02042 g003aMaterials 16 02042 g003b
Figure 4. Effect of curing condition on the linear shrinkage of AA-FASM. (a) Dry curing. (b) Seal curing. (c) Linear shrinkage change rate of B5 and B7.
Figure 4. Effect of curing condition on the linear shrinkage of AA-FASM. (a) Dry curing. (b) Seal curing. (c) Linear shrinkage change rate of B5 and B7.
Materials 16 02042 g004aMaterials 16 02042 g004b
Figure 5. XRD pattern of AA-FASM products under the different curing conditions.
Figure 5. XRD pattern of AA-FASM products under the different curing conditions.
Materials 16 02042 g005
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra of AA-FASM under the different curing conditions. (a) Seal curing. (b) Dry and water-saturation curing. (c) B13.
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra of AA-FASM under the different curing conditions. (a) Seal curing. (b) Dry and water-saturation curing. (c) B13.
Materials 16 02042 g006
Figure 7. Pore size distribution of AA-FASM under seal-curing condition at (a) 3 days and (b) 28 days.
Figure 7. Pore size distribution of AA-FASM under seal-curing condition at (a) 3 days and (b) 28 days.
Materials 16 02042 g007
Figure 8. Pore size distribution of AA-FASM under seal- and water-saturation-curing conditions.
Figure 8. Pore size distribution of AA-FASM under seal- and water-saturation-curing conditions.
Materials 16 02042 g008
Figure 9. Porosity of AA–FASM under seal– and water–saturation–curing conditions.
Figure 9. Porosity of AA–FASM under seal– and water–saturation–curing conditions.
Materials 16 02042 g009
Figure 10. Backscattered morphology of (a) S-B5 and (b) S-B7.
Figure 10. Backscattered morphology of (a) S-B5 and (b) S-B7.
Materials 16 02042 g010
Figure 11. Backscattering morphology of B5 and B7 under dry- and water-saturation-curing conditions. (a) D-B5. (b) D-B7. (c) W-B5. (d) W-B7.
Figure 11. Backscattering morphology of B5 and B7 under dry- and water-saturation-curing conditions. (a) D-B5. (b) D-B7. (c) W-B5. (d) W-B7.
Materials 16 02042 g011
Figure 12. Effect of interaction between WSG and M on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM. (a) 1 day. (b) 3 days. (c) 28 days.
Figure 12. Effect of interaction between WSG and M on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM. (a) 1 day. (b) 3 days. (c) 28 days.
Materials 16 02042 g012
Figure 13. Effect of interaction between WSG and RA on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM. (a) 1 day. (b) 3 days. (c) 28 days.
Figure 13. Effect of interaction between WSG and RA on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM. (a) 1 day. (b) 3 days. (c) 28 days.
Materials 16 02042 g013
Figure 14. Effect of interaction between M and RA on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM. (a) 1 day. (b) 3 days. (c) 28 days.
Figure 14. Effect of interaction between M and RA on the compressive strength model of AA-FASM. (a) 1 day. (b) 3 days. (c) 28 days.
Materials 16 02042 g014
Figure 15. Comparison of the fracture state of B5 and B7 of AA-FASM after compressive strength.
Figure 15. Comparison of the fracture state of B5 and B7 of AA-FASM after compressive strength.
Materials 16 02042 g015
Figure 16. Comparison of cracks between B1 (a) and B3 (b) of AA-FASM.
Figure 16. Comparison of cracks between B1 (a) and B3 (b) of AA-FASM.
Materials 16 02042 g016
Table 1. Oxide composition and loss on ignition of raw materials (weight in %).
Table 1. Oxide composition and loss on ignition of raw materials (weight in %).
MaterialsSiO2Al2O3CaOFe2O3MgOLOI a
Fly ash56.1532.423.181.000.250.88
Slag32.5815.0438.250.308.570
a Note: LOI represents the loss on ignition.
Table 2. Box–Behnken design with three factors and three levels.
Table 2. Box–Behnken design with three factors and three levels.
FactorCodeLevel
−101
WSG (%)X1255075
MX21.01.41.8
RA (%)X3455055
Table 3. Design scheme of response surface analysis under seal-curing condition.
Table 3. Design scheme of response surface analysis under seal-curing condition.
GroupWSG (%)MRA (%)CaO/(SiO2+Al2O3)
B1251.0500.136
B2251.8500.131
B3751.0500.436
B4751.8500.418
B5251.4450.135
B6251.4550.131
B7751.4450.432
B8751.4550.418
B9501.0450.269
B10501.0550.262
B11501.8450.260
B12501.8550.253
B13501.4500.261
B14501.4500.261
B15501.4500.261
B16501.4500.261
B17501.4500.261
Note: mass ratio.
Table 4. Porosity of AA-FASM under seal-curing condition (%).
Table 4. Porosity of AA-FASM under seal-curing condition (%).
DaysS-B5S-B6S-B7S-B8S-B13
3 5.3777.043.5233.9754.862
28 2.8145.1191.3601.9381.695
Table 5. Average Ca/Si ratio of geopolymer by EDS analysis.
Table 5. Average Ca/Si ratio of geopolymer by EDS analysis.
S-B5S-B7D-B5D-B7W-B5W-B7
Ca/Si0.43420.75810.41450.66640.40980.6120
Table 6. Test results of AA-FASM.
Table 6. Test results of AA-FASM.
NumbersCompressive Strength (MPa)CracksSetting Time (min)
1d3d28d1d3d28dInitialFinal
B111.218.843.1NNN317416
B211.415.940.3NNN131160
B337.638.944.6NLM101142
B425.340.041.2NLM5074
B515.723.550.0NNL217280
B612.817.338.9NNL288353
B742.245.158.5NLM5576
B830.635.736.7NLM73101
B932.937.850.8NLL117164
B1027.632.936.6NLL157236
B1131.739.348.3NNL6383
B1224.926.938.7NNL7492
B1324.632.746.3NLL101141
B1424.532.346.9NLL91139
B1525.233.146.6NLL98144
B1623.234.346.2NLL89142
B1725.632.145.5NLL86137
Table 7. Analysis of variance of response surface model.
Table 7. Analysis of variance of response surface model.
Source1d3d28d
F Valuep-ValueF Valuep-ValueF Valuep-Value
Model64.89<0.0001134.17<0.000122.040.0002
X1-X1435.57<0.0001947.73<0.00013.800.0922
X2-X215.740.00545.370.05362.170.1843
X3-X342.910.0003144.25<0.0001159.97<0.0001
X1 × 219.110.00334.160.08080.00460.8364
X1X39.090.01952.710.143711.520.0115
X2X30.280.610015.440.00572.090.1913
X1226.540.001377.34<0.00010.990.3534
X220.250.63210.510.497417.110.0044
X3237.600.000512.560.00940.480.5121
Lack of Fit4.780.08241.640.315318.430.0083
R20.98820.99420.9659
Note: p-value ≤ 0.01 is highly significant; p-value ≤ 0.05 is significant; p-value > 0.05 is not significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, J.; Wang, A.; Lyu, B.; Liu, K.; Chu, Y.; Ma, R.; Xu, H.; Jing, Y.; Sun, D. Proportioning Factors of Alkali-Activated Materials and Interaction Relationship Revealed by Response Surface Modeling. Materials 2023, 16, 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052042

AMA Style

Zhao J, Wang A, Lyu B, Liu K, Chu Y, Ma R, Xu H, Jing Y, Sun D. Proportioning Factors of Alkali-Activated Materials and Interaction Relationship Revealed by Response Surface Modeling. Materials. 2023; 16(5):2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Jun, Aiguo Wang, Bangcheng Lyu, Kaiwei Liu, Yingjie Chu, Rui Ma, Haiyan Xu, Yan Jing, and Daosheng Sun. 2023. "Proportioning Factors of Alkali-Activated Materials and Interaction Relationship Revealed by Response Surface Modeling" Materials 16, no. 5: 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop