Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Electromagnetic Wave Absorption of SiOC/Porous Carbon Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Lightning Strike Protection: Current Challenges and Future Possibilities
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Mg Powder’s Particle Size on Structure and Mechanical Properties of Ti Foam Synthesized by Space Holder Technique
Previous Article in Special Issue
Graphene Oxide-Modified Epoxy Asphalt Bond Coats with Enhanced Bonding Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 24
10.3390/ma15248862
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Facile Synthesis of CoOOH Nanorings over Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Application in the Reduction of p-Nitrophenol

by
Huihui Chen
1,2,3,
Mei Yang
2,
Jun Yue
3,* and
Guangwen Chen
2,*
1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(24), 8862; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248862
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 3 December 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graphene-Based Materials and Their Potential Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A facile and one-step route has been employed for the synthesis of highly uniform CoOOH nanorings assembled on the surface of reduced graphene oxide (CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite). The physicochemical properties of the obtained CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite were characterized using X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), N2 physical adsorption (BET) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The TEM and SEM results confirmed that CoOOH nanorings (edge length ∼ 95 nm) were uniformly decorated on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets using the simple precipitation–oxidation–reduction method. When used as a catalyst for the reduction of p-nitrophenol to p-aminophenol in the presence of excess NaBH4, the resulting CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite exhibited good activity and stability. When the initial concentration of p-nitrophenol was 1.25 × 10−4 mol·L−1, p-nitrophenol could be fully reduced within 3.25 min at room temperature. The apparent rate constant was estimated to be 1.77 min−1, which is higher than that of pure CoOOH nanorings. Moreover, p-nitrophenol could still be completely reduced within 6 min in the fifth successive cycle. The superior catalytic performance of the nanocomposite is attributed to the synergistic effect between the highly dispersed CoOOH nanorings and the unique surface properties of the reduced graphene oxide nanosheets, which greatly increased the concentration of p-nitrophenol near CoOOH nanorings on reduced graphene oxide surface and improved the local electron density at the interface.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the chemical industry, water pollution caused by mass production of various chemical products is increasingly aggravated. Among them, organic pollution is a non-negligible factor, which seriously threatens the ecological environment and human health. p-Nitrophenol (p-NP), one of the most hazardous organic pollutants in industrial and agricultural wastewater, is mutagenic and resistant to biodegradation [1]. Its residue and accumulation in the environment may damage the liver, kidney, and nervous system, and even cause blood disorder or cancer in humans [2,3,4]. It has been classified as a highly hazardous contaminant and its maximum concentration should be below 10 ng/L in natural water, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Therefore, the elimination or degradation of p-NP using a cost-effective and highly efficient method is highly significant for mitigating its adverse impact on the environment. Up to now, the catalytic reduction of p-NP to p-aminophenol (p-AP) using NaBH4 as a reducing agent is considered to be a promising and efficient strategy, because the reduction process produces only one product p-AP, which is less toxic and has a higher allowable concentration in the environment [5]. Furthermore, p-AP is a highly useful fine chemical and pharmaceutical intermediate, e.g., in the production of antipyretic analgesics, paracetamol, vitamin B1 and dyes [6].
Due to the high stability of nitrophenol compounds, appropriate catalysts are required to lower the kinetic barrier and accelerate the reaction rate for the reduction of p-NP to p-AP [7]. Various noble metal nanoparticles (like, Au, Ag, Pd, Pt, etc.) have been widely studied in recent years due to their excellent catalytic activity in the reduction of p-NP [8,9,10,11]. However, noble metal nanoparticles tend to seriously aggregate due to their small particle size during the reaction, and their high price due to limited reserves restrains their large-scale applications [3,12]. With the rapid development of nanotechnology, transition metal oxide nanomaterials have received extensive attention as catalysts, providing the possibility to substitute some noble metal catalysts. It has been reported that several transition metal oxide-based heterogeneous catalysts, such as Co3O4, CuO, Fe2O3 and NiO [13], exhibit catalytic activity in the reduction of p-NP to p-AP. For example, Che et al. [14] found that CuO nanostructures showed good catalytic activity for p-NP reduction and their catalytic activity in NaBH4 aqueous solution was dependent on its morphologies. Mogudi et al. [15] reported that mesoporous cobalt oxide could be used as a cost-effective catalyst for p-NP reduction. Moreover, Elfiad et al. [16] demonstrated the good catalytic activity and stability of natural α-Fe2O3 for the reduction of p-NP.
In particular, metallic cobalt and cobalt oxide catalysts have been considered as prospective candidates for the reduction of p-NP due to their high activity and low cost. As an example, magnetic Co/EAtp@C (carbon-coated etched attapulgite) nanocomposite used as a catalyst could lead to almost complete reduction of p-NP to p-AP within 8 min at room temperature [17]. Co-carbon composite containing N species, synthesized by one-step calcination of cobalt-based metal organic frameworks, could reduce p-NP to p-AP by nearly 100% within 115 s at room temperature [18]. Co3O4 nanoparticles are also frequently studied as catalysts for the reduction of p-NP to p-AP by NaBH4. Co3O4/BiFeO3 nanocomposite has been confirmed to be an efficient and recyclable catalyst for the reduction of nitrophenol isomers [19]. Our previous work has demonstrated that the catalytic activity of Co3O4 for the reduction of p-NP to p-AP was remarkably improved by the introduction of oxygen vacancies, and its apparent rate constant reached 1.49 min−1 at room temperature [20]. As a common cobalt oxide, CoOOH has a wide range of applications in sensors [21], supercapacitors [22], lithium-ion batteries [23], and catalysis. For example, it can be used as a catalyst for water oxidation [24]. However, there is no report on CoOOH as a catalyst to catalyze the reduction of p-NP to p-AP.
To further enhance the catalytic performance of cobalt-based catalysts, many strategies have been investigated, such as morphology modulation [25], element doping [18], surface defects fabrication [20], pores introduction [26], and support-induced interactions [27,28]. Among these modification methods, the immobilization of cobalt-based catalyst on an efficient support has received extensive attention because of its ability to prevent nanoparticle aggregation and the possible synergistic effect, which is beneficial to improve their catalytic activity [29,30]. For instance, halloysite nanotubes supported Co3O4 nanoparticles (Co3O4/HNTs) showed good catalytic performance because of the specific structural properties of Co3O4 endowed by halloysite nanotubes and the cooperative effects between them [30]. Owing to the synergistic effects between the support and metal-containing phase, commercial sponge-derived Co3O4@C catalysts exhibited excellent catalytic properties in styrene oxidation, rhodamine B decolourization and p-NP reduction [31].
Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) has been frequently employed as a carbon-based catalyst support owing to its large specific surface area and remarkable thermal and chemical stability [32,33]. The high specific surface area of rGO is beneficial for the loading of nanoparticles, thus improving the dispersion of particles on rGO nanosheets [34]. Moreover, many studies have demonstrated the presence of a synergistic effect between rGO and the anchoring particles, which can significantly enhance the catalytic performance [35,36]. For example, Co3O4 nanocrystals grown on rGO showed surprisingly high catalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reaction because of the synergetic chemical coupling effects between Co3O4 nanocrystals and graphene [37]. Owing to the cooperative effects of high surface area of graphene oxide sheets, graphene oxide-Ag2CO3 composites displayed a better photocatalytic activity for organic dyes degradation than pure Ag2CO3 crystal [38]. CoOOH-graphene nanosheets could act as an efficient oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalyst owing to the strong interface electron coupling between CoOOH nanosheets and graphene [39]. rGO-supported NiCo2O4 nanoparticles exhibited excellent catalytic property for the reduction of p-NP due to the synergistic effect between rGO and NiCo2O4 nanoparticles [40].
Herein, pure CoOOH nanorings and the composite of rGO and CoOOH nanorings were synthesized using a simple precipitation–oxidation–reduction method. Various characterization techniques such as XRD, TEM, SEM, BET and XPS were employed to investigate the composition, morphology and texture properties of the obtained nanocomposite. The catalytic performance of pure CoOOH nanorings and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite was evaluated by the reduction of p-NP to p-AP employing excess NaBH4 as a reducing agent. Experimental results indicated that the catalytic activity of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite was significantly enhanced compared with that of pure CoOOH nanorings due to the synergistic effect between the highly dispersed CoOOH nanorings and the unique surface properties of the rGO support. CoOOH nanorings and their composite were successfully synthesized and used as a catalyst for the reduction of p-NP, which has not been reported before. The results of this work demonstrate that the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite is a potential catalyst for the reduction of p-NP to p-AP by NaBH4.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Cobalt chloride (CoCl2·6H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 25 wt%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4) and p-nitrophenol (C6H5NO3) were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China) with analytical grade. Graphene oxide (dispersed in water, 2 mg/mL, sheet thickness 0.7–1.2 nm) synthesized using the improved Hummer’s method was purchased from Suzhou Tanfeng Graphene Tech. Inc. (Jiangsu, China) The corresponding graphene oxide powder had a specific surface area of 1000–1217 m2/g. All chemicals were used as received without further purification. Deionized water was employed throughout.

2.2. Synthesis of CoOOH/rGO Nanocomposite

CoCl2·6H2O (1.25 mmol) and NaOH (25 mmol) were dissolved into 50 mL and 100 mL deionized water, respectively. The CoCl2 aqueous solution was added into 50 mL of 2 mg/mL graphene oxide suspension in water. The resulting mixture was sonicated for 2 h at room temperature. Then, the mixture was transferred to a three-necked flask containing 50 mL water at 50 °C under N2 atmosphere. After mechanical stirring for 3 h, the NaOH aqueous solution was added into the mixture. A pink precipitate was obtained and kept at 50 °C for 2 h. Then, N2 flow was stopped and 147 mmol H2O2 (25 wt%) was added into the mixture solution. A black brown suspension was obtained and kept at 50 °C for 2 h. After being cooled naturally to room temperature, the black brown precipitate was collected, washed with deionized water for several times and then dried at 80 °C for 6 h. Subsequently, the obtained powder was soaked in NaBH4 aqueous solution (0.1 mol/L) at 30 °C for 40 min; then, the suspension was centrifuged, washed with deionized water for several times and dried at 80 °C for 6 h. For the sake of comparison, pure CoOOH was also synthesized using the same preparation method without the addition of graphene oxide suspension.

2.3. Catalyst Characterization

The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were carried out on a PANalytical X’pert-Pro powder X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) with Cu Ka monochromatized radiation (λ = 0.1541 nm), using a scanning rate of 5 °/min. The specific surface areas, pore volumes and pore sizes of the products were tested with the commonly used BET method on a Quadrasorb SI instrument (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) using nitrogen adsorption isotherms at 77 K. The morphologies of the products were collected on the JEOL JEM-2100 transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with the accelerating voltage of 120 kV, as well as the JEOL JSM-7800F scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with the accelerating voltage of 3 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) analysis was performed on an ESCALAB 250Xi system with Al Ka as the X-ray source. The UV–Visible spectra were collected on a UV–Visible double-beam spectrophotometer (UV-4802, UNICO, Shanghai, China), with a wavelength range of 200 to 800 nm and a quartz cuvette with light path of 1 cm wide.

2.4. Catalytic Reduction of p-NP to p-AP by NaBH4

The reduction of p-NP to p-AP by NaBH4 was performed under controllable conditions to evaluate the catalytic performance of the obtained nanocomposite. Typically, the catalytic reaction was conducted at room temperature (ca. 23.5 °C) using a 3.5 mL standard quartz cell. p-NP aqueous solution (2.0 mL, 0.175 mmol/L) was first mixed with a freshly-prepared NaBH4 solution (0.7 mL, 0.05 mol/L) in the quartz cell. Then, the catalytic reaction was started by the quick addition of 0.1 mL suspension (2 g/L) containing the obtained CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite or pure CoOOH nanorings. The reduction process was monitored by UV–vis adsorption spectra of p-NP anions (400 nm) at regular intervals.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Catalyst

Figure 1 shows the wide-angle XRD patterns of pure CoOOH and the composite of CoOOH with rGO. According to JCPDS 00-007-0169, every diffraction peak in the XRD pattern of pure CoOOH can be indexed to the characteristic diffraction peaks of the rhombohedral phase of CoOOH [41]. The diffraction peaks at 20.24°, 37.02°, 38.93°, 50.67°, 65.42° and 69.25° in the XRD pattern of pure CoOOH are readily indexed to the (0 0 3), (1 0 1), (0 1 2), (0 1 5), (1 1 0), and (1 1 3) facets of rhombohedral CoOOH, respectively. It is obvious that the characteristic diffraction peaks of the composite of CoOOH with rGO are identical to those of pure CoOOH except for the different intensities, and no conventional stacking peak of rGO was detected in the XRD pattern, implying that the diffraction intensity of rGO nanosheets is relatively low [42]. The different diffraction intensities suggest that the crystallinity of CoOOH decreased slightly during the formation of CoOOH/rGO composite.
The morphology and microstructure of the as-synthesized pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite were investigated using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2a,b, the obtained pure CoOOH has a regular hexagonal nanoring structure, and each nanoring has a large hollow interior. The particle size distribution of CoOOH nanorings is uniform, with an average outer diameter and edge length of ∼150 nm and 95 nm, respectively. A small number of CoOOH nanorings were broken, and the broken nanoring fragments can be observed in the images. SEM images of the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite indicate that the as-synthesized composite is composed of aggregated and crumpled rGO nanosheets along with lots of CoOOH nanorings, many of which were wrapped together by rGO nanosheets (Figure 2c,d). It is obvious that CoOOH nanoring’s structure was well maintained during loading with rGO nanosheets. The TEM image shows that CoOOH nanorings were decorated on the rGO nanosheets successfully (Figure 2e). A high resolution TEM image of the nanocomposite shows an interplanar spacing between adjacent planes of 0.44 nm, which is consistent with the (0 0 3) crystal plane of rhombohedeal CoOOH (Figure 2f). These images demonstrate that rGO nanosheets can be anchored by CoOOH nanorings through the current facile precipitation–oxidation–reduction method.
The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and BJH adsorption pore size distributions of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite are plotted in Figure 3. Type IV isotherms (IUPAC classification) are present for both pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite, indicating their mesoporous characteristics (Figure 3a) [43]. The pure CoOOH exhibits an H1-type hysteresis loop, which is related to the capillary condensation inside the mesopores, indicating the existence of mesoporous structure. An H2 hysteresis loop was observed for CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite, implying its complex pore structure. In addition, the hysteresis loop of CoOOH/rGO is significantly larger than that of pure CoOOH, suggesting the increased amount of pores in the nanocomposite [44]. It is thus likely that some of the pores in the nanocomposite were generated by the voids of aggregated particles, given that many of the CoOOH nanorings were wrapped together by rGO nanosheets. The pore size distribution derived from the adsorption branch of pure CoOOH shows a broad distribution, ranging from 1.7 nm to 61.9 nm, while that of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite is broader, ranging from 1.9 nm to 93.6 nm (Figure 3b). The specific surface area, pore volume and pore diameter of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite based on BET method are depicted in Table 1. The BET specific surface areas of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite are 72.6 and 68.2 m2·g−1, respectively. The slight decrease in the nanocomposite specific surface area may be due to the stacking, coating and curling between CoOOH nanorings and rGO nanosheets. The pore volume of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite is larger than that of pure CoOOH (being 0.34 and 0.29 cc·g−1, respectively), which is consistent with more pores in the nanocomposite. Moreover, the average pore diameters of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite are basically the same (being 3.5 and 3.4 nm, respectively), implying that the pores in the nanocomposite were mainly from CoOOH nanorings. This also proves that the structure of CoOOH nanorings was well preserved in the nanocomposite.
The chemical composition and surface chemical states of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite were qualitatively characterized with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results suggest that the main peaks in the XPS full spectra of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite can be ascribed to Co, O or C elements without any impurities (Figure 4a). In general, the presence of C element in the spectrum of pure CoOOH can be attributed to the hydrocarbon contaminants inherent in XPS analysis. It is obvious that the peak intensity of C 1s spectrum of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite is higher than that of pure CoOOH, while the peak intensities of Co and O 1s spectra are lower than those of pure CoOOH. These can be attributed to the presence of rGO nanosheets on the surface of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite. The C 1s spectrum of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite observed at 284.6 eV can be fitted into three component peaks at 284.5, 286.3, and 288.2 eV (Figure 4b). The major peak located at 284.5 eV corresponds to the sp2 graphitic carbon (C-C), indicating that most C atoms were still in the honeycomb lattice of rGO and the structure of rGO was preserved. While the other two peaks can be attributed to the C-O bond carbon (286.3 eV) and carbonyl carbon (C=O, 288.2 eV), resulting from the oxygen-contained carbon atoms, which is consistent with the low content of oxygen-containing functional groups in rGO. Detailed information on the chemical oxidation states can be obtained from the high resolution spectra of the detected elements. As shown in Figure 4c, the Co 2p spectrum of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite presents two main peaks with binding energies of 780.2 and 795.3 eV, corresponding to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, respectively. Meanwhile, the binding energies of the two peaks in the Co 2p spectrum of pure CoOOH are 780.1 and 795.1 eV, respectively. The shift of binding energies towards higher values (by 0.1–0.2 eV) when CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite was formed is mainly due to the interaction between the CoOOH nanorings and rGO support. The peak intensity of Co 2p in CoOOH/rGO is significantly weaker than that of pure CoOOH, which indirectly shows that the CoOOH nanorings were wrapped by rGO nanosheets. Moreover, the curve-fitted Co 2p3/2 spectrum of CoOOH/rGO has two peaks located at 780.0 and 781.5 eV, and the curve fitting peaks of pure CoOOH are at 780.1 and 781.8 eV, which are the characteristic peaks of CoOOH. Furthermore, the high-resolution O 1s spectrum of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite observed at 531.3 eV can be deconvoluted into four typical peaks at 529.4, 530.8, 532.0 and 532.8 eV, corresponding to the metal oxygen bond (Co-O), hydroxyl species (i.e., CoOOH and C-OH), C-O bonds, and surface bonded water, respectively (Figure 4d). The peak area at 530.8 eV is evidently larger than the peak at 529.4 eV, indicating the presence of C-OH bonds in the nanocomposite, which in turn proves that the CoOOH/rGO is composed of CoOOH nanorings and rGO. The O 1s spectrum of pure CoOOH can be fitted into three peaks at 529.6, 530.7 and 531.8 eV, which can be assigned to the Co-O bond, Co-OH bond in CoOOH and surface adsorbed water, respectively. The XPS results together with TEM and SEM images unequivocally demonstrate the successful immobilization of CoOOH nanorings on the surface of rGO surface.

3.2. Catalytic Reduction of p-Nitrophenol

The catalytic reduction of p-NP to p-AP with excessive NaBH4 was used as a probe reaction to evaluate the catalytic performance of the obtained samples. The reaction was performed in a standard quartz cell and the time-dependent concentration change of the reactant (p-NP) and product (p-AP) was monitored by an in situ UV–vis spectrophotometer. The light yellow p-NP aqueous solution has a strong characteristic absorption peak at 317 nm. After adding NaBH4 aqueous solution, the color of the mixture solution turned to green-yellow and the adsorption peak shifted to 400 nm due to the formation of p-nitrophenolate ions under alkaline condition. According to the standard electrode potential (p-NP/p-AP = −0.76 V, H3BO3/BH4− = −1.33 V), the reduction of p-NP to p-AP is considered to be a thermodynamically spontaneous process. However, the reaction cannot proceed without an efficient catalyst due to the high kinetic barrier and potential difference between the mutually repelling negative donor (BH4− ions) and acceptor (p-nitrophenolate ions) [45]. With the addition of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite, the solution changed from green-yellow to colorless quickly. The time-dependent absorption spectra show that the absorption peak of p-NP at 400 nm decreased gradually with time, and a new absorption peak located at 300 nm simultaneously appeared, indicating the reduction of p-NP to p-AP (Figure 5a). The adsorption peak at 400 nm no longer decreased after 3.25 min, suggesting the complete reduction of p-NP. When the pure CoOOH was used as catalyst, it took about 10.42 min for the full conversion of p-NP to p-AP (Figure 5b). It is obvious that the decreasing rate of the peak intensity at 400 nm varies greatly as the reaction proceeds, implying different catalytic activities of CoOOH/rGO and pure CoOOH in the reduction of p-NP (Figure 5a,b).
The reaction kinetics of the catalytic reduction of p-NP to p-AP using NaBH4 as a reducing agent has been frequently studied. In this work, the initial molar ratio of NaBH4 to p-NP was set at 100 (i.e., in the presence of a significant excess of NaBH4). Due to the high initial concentration of NaBH4, the concentration of BH4− remained basically stable during the reaction, and thus hardly affects the reaction rate. Then, it is reasonable to suppose that the reduction reaction follows a typical pseudo-first-order kinetics. The apparent rate constant (kapp) can be calculated from the following equation:
−ln(Ct /C0) = −ln(At/A0) = kappt
where At and A0 are the absorbance of p-NP (at 400 nm wavelength) at time of t and 0 min, respectively. Ct and C0 represent the corresponding concentrations of p-NP acquired from At and A0, respectively. Therefore, the apparent rate constant values are determined by the slopes of the respective linear curves of t versus −ln(At/A0). Compared with pure CoOOH, CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite could catalyze the reduction of p-NP to p-AP in a much shorter time (Figure 6a). The apparent rate constant values for the reduction reaction when using 0.2 mg of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite or pure CoOOH are 1.77 and 1.22 min−1, respectively (Figure 6b). Furthermore, we conducted three replicate experiments with CoOOH/rGO as the catalyst at the same condition, and the experimental error was about 6.7%, which can be attributed to the difference in ambient temperature and other experimental uncertainties. This also shows good experimental reproducibility. Figure 6 demonstrates that the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite has a higher catalytic activity, despite its specific surface area being slightly lower than that of pure CoOOH (Table 1). It has been proven that the reduction of p-NP to p-AP is a surface-controlled process, which can be explained well by the Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism [7]. This suggests that the reduction process takes place on the catalyst surface and the surface area would have a great effect on the apparent rate constant, accordingly. Since the slight reduction in surface area observed in CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite did not render a decrease in its catalytic activity, the much improved activity of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite must be due to some other features related to its structure [46].
For heterogeneous catalytic reaction, the catalytic reduction of p-NP occurs only when BH4− and p-NP are adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst. The CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite served as the catalyst to relay active hydrogen species and electrons from the adsorbed donor (BH4−) to the adsorbed acceptor (p-NP) nearby, thereby triggering the reduction reaction. Therefore, the efficient adsorption performance for p-NP and BH4− as well as its excellent electron transport ability, are the key factors for a catalyst to have superior activity [36]. In addition, Qu et al. have demonstrated that, for the catalytic hydrogenation of p-NP, increasing the amount of reactants adsorbed on the catalyst surface is beneficial in improving the catalytic performance [47]. Therefore, the superior catalytic performance of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite can be ascribed to the synergistic effect between the highly dispersed CoOOH nanorings and the unique surface properties of the rGO support, which can be explained as follows. p-NP ions were preferentially adsorbed on the surface of rGO nanosheets via π–π stacking interaction, leading to a high concentration of p-NP near the CoOOH nanorings anchored on rGO nanosheets, which was conducive to the efficient contact between p-NP and the CoOOH nanorings, thereby improving the catalytic activity. Moreover, the electron transfer from rGO nanosheets to CoOOH nanorings increased the local electron density at their interface, facilitating the uptake of electrons by p-NP [2,48,49,50,51].
Moreover, it is clear that there is an induction time (t0) in the catalytic reduction of p-NP, during which no reduction occurs. The existence of an induction time has been widely reported. Some assumptions about the induction time, including spontaneous surface reconstruction, activation time and diffusion time, have been discussed. However, the concrete reasoning remains unclear and a controversial issue [6]. Generally, the higher the catalytic activity of a catalyst, the shorter the induction time [20]. When used as a catalyst, CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite has an induction time of less than 0.95 min, while pure CoOOH exhibits an induction time of about 6 min (Figure 6a,b, Table 2). The CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite has high catalytic activity and correspondingly short induction time, which is consistent with the general findings. The difference in induction time may be attributed to the different diffusion time of reactants to the catalyst surface. For a heterogeneous catalytic reaction, the reactants first diffuse from the bulk solution to the catalyst surface, and then adsorb onto the catalyst surface before the reaction occurs. From the above discussion, CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite had high adsorption ability towards p-NP because of the strong π−π interaction. Moreover, the reduction process by NaBH4 aqueous solution can remove part of the oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of graphene oxide, further enhancing the π–π interaction between p-NP and rGO nanosheets, which enabled a high concentration of p-NP near the CoOOH nanorings on rGO surface. The strong π−π interaction between p-NP and rGO nanosheets promoted the faster diffusion of p-NP molecules to the CoOOH/rGO surface, which ultimately led to a shorter induction time.
A comparative study for the reduction of p-NP to p-AP with other catalysts is given in Table 3. For the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model reaction, the amount of catalyst would have a large effect on the apparent rate constant (kapp) by affecting the total surface area. To eliminate the influence of catalyst dosage on the catalytic activity, the mass-normalized rate constant (knor) is usually adopted to compare the activities of various catalysts [52], as defined as Equation (2):
knor = kapp/wcat
where wcat is the mass concentration of the catalyst in the solution. In addition, Table 3 shows the concentrations of p-NP and NaBH4 (i.e., Cp-NP and CNaBH4, respectively) used in the catalytic reaction process, which is also an important factor that affects the apparent rate constant. It can be seen from Table 3 that the catalytic activity of the as-prepared CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite in this work is comparable or even better than that of supported noble metal catalysts (e.g., graphene/Au, Pt@Ag, rGO-Ag and Pd/graphene), and is obviously higher than that of cobalt based composites (e.g., NiCo2O4/rGO, CoOx/CN and Co3O4@C), confirming its relatively high efficiency in the catalytic reduction of p-NP.
Activation energy (Ea) is an important kinetic parameter to evaluate the performance of a catalyst, which reflects the temperature dependence of the (apparent) rate constant during the catalytic process. The catalytic reduction of p-NP over the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite at different reaction temperatures was investigated and the corresponding kapp values were studied. The results are shown in Figure 7. It can be clearly seen that the increase in reaction temperature results in a larger kapp (Figure 7a), indicating the enhanced catalytic activity of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite, which can be ascribed to the increase in molecular motion rate of the reactants as well as the increase in collision probability [62,63]. When the temperature was increased from 13.5 °C to 23.5 °C, the value of kapp increased from 1.03 min−1 to 1.77 min−1. The apparent activation energy of the catalytic reduction process can be obtained according to the Arrhenius equation:
lnkapp = lnA − Ea/RT
where A is the pre-exponential factor and R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J·mol−1·K−1), and T is the temperature in K. Figure 7b shows that lnk has a good linear relationship with 1/T (R2 = 0.9995) and the apparent activation energy for the reduction of p-NP was calculated to be 38.18 kJ·mol−1 over the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite. This value is comparable to the previously reported values for the supported noble metal catalysts [64,65].
Besides the catalytic reactivity, the recyclability is also a vital aspect to evaluate the performance of a catalyst. The reusability of the as-prepared nanocomposite was assessed by continuously adding concentrated p-NP aqueous solution after each cycle to adjust the concentration of p-NP to 0.125 mmol/L before reaction. The concentration of NaBH4 in the first cycle was 12.5 mmol/L, which was 100 times that of p-NP, and no NaBH4 was added in subsequent cycles. It can be observed from Figure 8 that the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite exhibits satisfactory stability during five consecutive cycles. As the number of cycles increased, although the catalytic activity of the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite decreased slightly, p-NP could still be completely reduced to p-AP within 6 min in the fifth cycle. Moreover, the structural characteristics of the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite after the catalytic reduction of p-NP to p-AP were studied (Figure 8b). CoOOH nanorings and rGO nanosheets can also be clearly observed, indicating that the structure of CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite was maintained to a certain or large extent during the reduction reaction. However, compared to the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite before the reduction reaction, more nanorings were broken, and broken nanoring fragments could be observed. This possibly contributed to the catalyst deactivation. In addition to the slow deactivation of the catalyst itself, which led to the reduction in catalytic activity, the consumption and decomposition of NaBH4 are also part of the reason for the reduced catalytic activity. The results indicate that the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite possesses superior activity and good stability for the catalytic reduction of p-NP to p-AP with excessive NaBH4.

4. Conclusions

The CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite has been successfully fabricated using a facile precipitation–oxidation–reduction one-step method. The CoOOH nanorings with a hexagonal outer profile were uniformly anchored on the surface of rGO nanosheets and the obtained CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite exhibited superior activity in the catalytic reduction of p-NP to p-AP with excessive NaBH4. It only took 3.25 min for the complete conversion of p-NP over the CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite at room temperature, and the apparent rate constant and apparent activation energy were estimated to be 1.77 min−1 and 38.18 kJ·mol−1, respectively. Additionally, the nanocomposite showed good stability in five successive cycles. The catalytic activity of CoOOH was significantly increased by immobilizing CoOOH nanorings on the surface of rGO, due to the synergistic effect between CoOOH nanorings and rGO nanosheets. Considering its easy preparation, excellent activity and good recyclability, the nanocomposite of CoOOH nanorings with rGO would be a promising catalyst for the catalytic reduction of p-NP to p-AP with NaBH4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C. and M.Y.; methodology, H.C. and M.Y.; formal analysis, H.C. and J.Y.; investigation, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C.; writing—review and editing, H.C., J.Y. and G.C.; funding acquisition, G.C. and H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ph.D. Foundation of Henan University of Technology (No. 2018BS047), Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (No.202300410108), Colleges and Universities Key Research Program Foundation of Henan Province (No.20A150013), the Innovative Funds Plan of Henan University of Technology (No.2020ZKCJ04), and the China Scholarship Council visiting scholarship (No.202008410370).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dragos-Pinzaru, O.G.; Buema, G.; Gherca, D.; Tabakovic, I.; Lupu, N. Effect of the preparation conditions on the catalytic properties of copt for highly efficient 4-nitrophenol reduction. Materials 2022, 15, 6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dan, H.; Song, Y.; Xu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Kong, W.; Huang, Y.; Yue, Q.; Gao, B. Green synthesis of Cu nanoparticles supported on straw-graphene composite for catalytic reduction of p-nitrophenol. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 124578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Akbarzadeh, E.; Bahrami, F.; Gholami, M.R. Au and Pt nanoparticles supported on Ni promoted MoS2 as efficient catalysts for p-nitrophenol reduction. J. Water Process. Eng. 2020, 34, 101142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Geng, L.; Li, G.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, D.S.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Wang, G.; Han, H. Rational design of CuO/SiO2 nanocatalyst with anchor structure and hydrophilic surface for efficient hydrogenation of nitrophenol. J. Solid State. Chem. 2021, 296, 121960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liao, G.; Gong, Y.; Zhong, L.; Fang, J.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Z.; Gao, H.; Fang, B. Unlocking the door to highly efficient Ag-based nanoparticles catalysts for NaBH4-assisted nitrophenol reduction. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 2407–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Din, M.I.; Khalid, R.; Hussain, Z.; Hussain, T.; Mujahid, A.; Najeeb, J.; Izhar, F. Nanocatalytic assemblies for catalytic reduction of nitrophenols: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2020, 50, 322–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kotp, M.G.; El-Mahdy, A.F.; Yang, T.L.; Kuo, S.W. A pyridinyl-phenanzine conjugated microporous polymer decorated with ultrafine Ag nanoparticles mediates the rapid reduction of nitrophenol. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2022, 331, 111669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohamed, H.O.; Lotfi, B.T.; Abdel, H.H. Synthesis of ultra-small gold nanoparticles by polyphenol extracted from Salvia officinalis and efficiency for catalytic reduction of p-nitrophenol and methylene blue. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2020, 13, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayman, M.M.; Eman, A.M.; Nasser, S.A.; Hala, A.I. Catalytic activity of Ag nanoparticles and Au/Ag nanocomposite prepared by pulsed laser ablation technique against 4-nitrophenol for environmental applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 11978–11988. [Google Scholar]
  10. Swarnalata, S.; Bhavya, M.B.; Vishal, K.; Prangya, B.; Akshaya, K.S.; Siddappa, A.P. Controlled synthesis of palladium nanocubes as an efficient nanocatalyst for Suzuki−Miyaura cross-coupling and reduction of p-nitrophenol. Langmuir 2020, 36, 5208–5218. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ji-Hyang, N.; Reinout, M. Synthesis and catalytic evaluation of dendrimer-templated and reverse microemulsion Pd and Pt nanoparticles in the reduction of 4-nitrophenol: The effect of size and synthetic methodologies. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 497, 107–120. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hasan, Z.; Ok, Y.S.; Rinklebe, J.; Tsang, Y.F.; Cho, D.W.; Song, H. N doped cobalt-carbon composite for reduction of p-nitrophenol and pendimethaline. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 703, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Somasundaram, S.; Ill-Min, C.; Vanaraj, R.; Ramaganthan, B.; Mayakrishnan, G. Highly active and reducing agent-free preparation of cost-effective NiO-based carbon nanocomposite and its application in reduction reactions under mild conditions. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 60, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Che, W.; Ni, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y. Morphology-controllable synthesis of CuO nanostructures and their catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2015, 77, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mogudi, B.M.; Ncube, P.; Meijboom, R. Catalytic activity of mesoporous cobalt oxides with controlled porosity and crystallite sizes: Evaluation using the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 198, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elfiad, A.; Galli, F.; Djadoun, A.; Sennour, M.; Chegrouche, S.; Meddour-Boukhobza, L.; Boffito, D.C. Natural α-Fe2O3 as an efficient catalyst for the p-nitrophenol reduction. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 229, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, S.; Zhong, L.; Xu, Z.; Hu, J.; Tang, A.; Zuo, X. Mineral-modulated Co catalyst with enhanced adsorption and dissociation of BH4− for hydrogenation of p-nitrophenol to p-aminophenol. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hasan, Z.; Cho, D.W.; Chon, C.M.; Yoon, K.; Song, H. Reduction of p-nitrophenol by magnetic Co-carbon composites derived from metal organic frameworks. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 298, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, X.; Quan, S.; Yang, L.; Shi, G.; Shi, F. Facile synthesis of magnetic Co3O4/BFO nanocomposite for effective reduction of nitrophenol isomers. Chemosphere 2019, 219, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, H.; Yang, M.; Tao, S.; Chen, G. Oxygen vacancy enhanced catalytic activity of reduced Co3O4 towards p-nitrophenol reduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 209, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Upadhyay, D.; Roondhe, B.; Pratap, A.; Jha, P.K. Two-dimensional delafossite cobalt oxyhydroxide as a toxic gas sensor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 476, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dhawale, D.S.; Kim, S.; Park, D.H.; Choy, J.H.; Al-deyab, S.S.; Ariga, K.; Kim, E.; Vinu, A. Hierarchically ordered porous CoOOH thin film electrodes for high performance supercapacitors. ChemElectroChem 2015, 2, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Seyyedin, S.T.; Yaftian, M.R.; Sovizi, M.R. Cobalt oxyhydroxide/graphene oxide nanocomposite for amelioration of electrochemical performance of lithium/sulfur batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017, 21, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, S.; Yu, T.; Wen, H.; Ni, Z.; He, Y.; Guo, R.; You, J.; Liu, X. The latest development of CoOOH two-dimensional materials used as OER catalysts. Chem. Comm. 2020, 56, 15387–15405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, Q.; Feng, Z.; Mo, S.; Huang, C.; Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Fu, M.; Wu, J.; Ye, D. 1D-Co3O4, 2D-Co3O4, 3D-Co3O4 for catalytic oxidation of toluene. Catal. Today 2019, 332, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hong, Q.L.; Zhai, Q.G.; Liang, X.L.; Yang, Y.; Li, F.M.; Jiang, Y.C.; Hu, M.C.; Li, S.N.; Chen, Y. Holey cobalt oxyhydroxide nanosheets for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 3297–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Shen, J.; Yang, X.; Zou, W.; Chen, J.; Li, C. Cobalt nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 15080–15089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, Q.; Choi, H.; Chen, Y.; Dionysiou, D.D. Heterogeneous activation of peroxymonosulfate by supported cobalt catalysts for the degradation of 2, 4-dichlorophenol in water: The effect of support, cobalt precursor, and UV radiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 77, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ndolomingo, M.J.; Bingwa, N.; Meijboom, R. Review of supported metal nanoparticles: Synthesis methodologies, advantages and application as catalysts. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 6195–6241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, M.; Su, X.; Ma, L.; Khan, A.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Maloletnev, A.; Yang, C. Promotion effects of halloysite nanotubes on catalytic activity of Co3O4 nanoparticles toward reduction of 4-nitrophenol and organic dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Żółtowska, S.; Miñambres, J.F.; Piasecki, A.; Mertens, F.; Jesionowski, T. Three-dimensional commercial-sponge-derived Co3O4@ C catalysts for effective treatments of organic contaminants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hareesh, K.; Joshi, R.P.; Sunitha, D.V.; Bhoraskar, V.N.; Dhole, S.D. Anchoring of Ag-Au alloy nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide sheets for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 389, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar]
  33. An, X.; Li, K.; Tang, J. Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide composites for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kang, X.; Teng, D.; Wu, S.; Tian, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, P.; Ma, Y.; Liang, C. Ultrafine copper nanoparticles anchored on reduced graphene oxide present excellent catalytic performance toward 4-nitrophenol reduction. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2020, 566, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, Q.; Bu, D.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Di, L. Cold plasma preparation of Pd/Graphene catalyst for reduction of p-nitrophenol. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Duan, Q. Preparation of reduced-graphene-oxide-supported CoPt and Ag nanoparticles for the catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Dai, H. Co3O4 nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 780–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dong, C.; Wu, K.L.; Wei, X.W.; Li, X.Z.; Liu, L.; Ding, T.H.; Wang, J.; Ye, Y. Synthesis of graphene oxide-Ag2CO3 composites with improved photoactivity and anti-photocorrosion. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, F.; Cheng, W.; Huang, Y.; Su, H.; Yao, T.; Liu, Q.; Liu, J.; Hu, F.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, Z. Strong surface hydrophilicity in Co-based electrocatalysts for water oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 26867–26873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jacob, B.; Mohan, M.; Dhanyaprabha, K.; Thomas, H. NiCo2O4 nanoparticles anchored on reduced graphene oxide with enhanced catalytic activity towards the reduction of p-nitrophenol in water. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 643, 128717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, L.; Wu, W.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, W.; Wu, Y. Composite of CoOOH nanoplates with multiwalled carbon nanotubes as superior cathode material for supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 7069–7075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mohammadi, Z.; Entezari, M.H. Sono-synthesis approach in uniform loading of ultrafine Ag nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets: An efficient catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Ultrason. Sonochem 2018, 44, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ortiz-Quiñonez, J.L.; Pal, U. Borohydride-assisted surface activation of Co3O4/CoFe2O4 composite and its catalytic activity for 4-nitrophenol reduction. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 10129–10139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Chernykh, M.; Mikheeva, N.; Zaikovskii, V.; Salaev, M.; Liotta, L.F.; Mamontov, G. Room-temperature nitrophenol reduction over Ag-CeO2 catalysts: The role of catalyst preparation method. Catalysts 2020, 10, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, L.; Liu, X.; Guo, A.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Long, Y.; Fan, G. Cobalt with porous carbon architecture: Towards of 4-nitrophenol degradation and reduction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 288, 120595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zuo, F.; Bozhilov, K.; Dillon, R.J.; Wang, L.; Smith, P.; Zhao, X.; Bardeen, C.; Feng, P. Active facets on titanium (III)-doped TiO2: An effective strategy to improve the visible-light photocatalytic activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6223–6226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, S.; Chang, C.R.; Huang, Z.Q.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Qu, Y. High catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of sub-nanometric Pd clusters on porous nanorods of CeO2 for hydrogenation of nitroarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2629–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Al Nafiey, A.; Addad, A.; Sieber, B.; Chastanet, G.; Barras, A.; Szunerits, S.; Boukherroub, R. Reduced graphene oxide decorated with Co3O4 nanoparticles (rGO-Co3O4) nanocomposite: A reusable catalyst for highly efficient reduction of 4-nitrophenol, and Cr (VI) and dye removal from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 322, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fang, J.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, H. Facile and green synthesis of Au nanorods/graphene oxide nanocomposite with excellent catalytic properties for reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 5880–5891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, S.; Guo, S.; Yang, H.; Gou, G.; Ren, R.; Li, J.; Dong, Z.; Jin, J.; Ma, J. Enhancing catalytic performance of Au catalysts by noncovalent functionalized graphene using functional ionic liquids. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 270, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tian, Y.; Liu, Y.; Pang, F.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X. Green synthesis of nanostructed Ni-reduced graphene oxide hybrids and their application for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Colloids Surf. A 2015, 464, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, Y.; Yang, C.; Huang, X.; Li, L.; Yu, N.; Xie, H.; Zhu, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Zhou, L. Two-dimensional MXene enabled carbon quantum dots@ Ag with enhanced catalytic activity towards the reduction of p-nitrophenol. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 4836–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lv, Z.S.; Zhu, X.Y.; Meng, H.B.; Feng, J.J.; Wang, A.J. One-pot synthesis of highly branched Pt@Ag core-shell nanoparticles as a recyclable catalyst with dramatically boosting the catalytic performance for 4-nitrophenol reduction. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2019, 538, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lu, M.; Li, J.; Song, S.; Li, L.; Lin, J.; Zhang, B.; Li, J. The synthesis of 3D graphene/Au composites via γ-ray irradiation and their use for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 235604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, C.; Su, Y.; Cheng, M.; Liu, J.; Hou, S. Gold and cobalt nanoparticles dispersed on N-doped carbon matrix as a catalyst for 4-nitrophenol reduction. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202103739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yu, B.; Han, B.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, C.; Xia, K.; Gao, Q.; Wu, J. Toward high activity and durability: An oxygen-rich boron nitride-supported Au nanoparticles for 4-nitrophenol hydrogenation. J. Phys.Chem. C 2019, 123, 10389–10397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tu, W.; Cheng, J.; Yang, R.; Guo, Z.; Yu, D.; Sheng, Z.; Zhao, J.; Song, H.; Song, Y.; Yang, F. The Co3O4 nanosheet hybridized with silver nanoparticles affords long-acting synergetic antimicrobial and catalytic degradation activity. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 914, 165284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Landge, V.K.; Sonawane, S.H.; Manickam, S.; Babu, G.U.B.; Boczkaj, G. Ultrasound-assisted wet-impregnation of Ag-Co nanoparticles on cellulose nanofibers: Enhanced catalytic hydrogenation of 4-nitrophenol. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kong, C.; Lei, W.; Lei, B.; Pu, F.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, C.; Yang, Z. CoFe nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide for the highly efficient reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Langmuir 2021, 37, 10987–10993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, X.; Wang, N.; Geng, L.; Fu, J.; Hu, H.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, B.; Carozza, J.; Han, H. Facile synthesis of ultrafine cobalt oxides embedded into N-doped carbon with superior activity in hydrogenation of 4-nitrophenol. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2018, 512, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gulati, A.; Malik, J.; Kakkar, R. Peanut shell biotemplate to fabricate porous magnetic Co3O4 coral reef and its catalytic properties for p-nitrophenol reduction and oxidative dye degradation. Colloids Surf. A 2020, 604, 125328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, J.; Li, J.; Meng, R.; Jian, P.; Wang, L. Silver nanoparticles-decorated-Co3O4 porous sheets as efficient catalysts for the liquid-phase hydrogenation reduction of p-nitrophenol. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 551, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, X.; Li, X.; Qin, L.; Mu, J.; Kang, S.Z. Co3O4/CoP composite hollow polyhedron: A superior catalyst with dramatic efficiency and stability for the room temperature reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 434, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kuroda, K.; Ishida, T.; Haruta, M. Reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol over Au nanoparticles deposited on PMMA. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2009, 298, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Li, L.; Guo, X.; Lincoln, S.F.; Prud’homme, R.K. Cooperative catalytic activity of cyclodextrin and Ag nanoparticles immobilized on spherical polyelectrolyte brushes. AIChE J. 2014, 60, 1977–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 08862 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (1) pure CoOOH and (2) CoOOH/rGO.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (1) pure CoOOH and (2) CoOOH/rGO.
Materials 15 08862 g001
Materials 15 08862 g002a 550Materials 15 08862 g002b 550
Figure 2. (a) TEM and (b) SEM images of pure CoOOH. (c,d) SEM images of CoOOH/rGO at different magnifications. (e,f) TEM images of CoOOH/rGO at (e) low magnification and (f) high magnification.
Figure 2. (a) TEM and (b) SEM images of pure CoOOH. (c,d) SEM images of CoOOH/rGO at different magnifications. (e,f) TEM images of CoOOH/rGO at (e) low magnification and (f) high magnification.
Materials 15 08862 g002aMaterials 15 08862 g002b
Materials 15 08862 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm curves and (b) BJH pore size distributions of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite.
Figure 3. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm curves and (b) BJH pore size distributions of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO nanocomposite.
Materials 15 08862 g003
Materials 15 08862 g004a 550Materials 15 08862 g004b 550
Figure 4. (a) XPS survey spectra of (1) pure CoOOH and (2) CoOOH/rGO. (b) C 1s spectra of CoOOH/rGO. (c) Co 2p spectra and (d) O 1s spectra of (1) pure CoOOH and (2) CoOOH/rGO.
Figure 4. (a) XPS survey spectra of (1) pure CoOOH and (2) CoOOH/rGO. (b) C 1s spectra of CoOOH/rGO. (c) Co 2p spectra and (d) O 1s spectra of (1) pure CoOOH and (2) CoOOH/rGO.
Materials 15 08862 g004aMaterials 15 08862 g004b
Materials 15 08862 g005 550
Figure 5. The UV–vis absorption spectra during the catalytic reduction of p-NP with (a) CoOOH/rGO and (b) pure CoOOH at different reaction times. Reaction conditions: Initial p-NP concentration (Cp-NP) at 0.125 mmol/L, molar ratio of NaBH4 to p-NP at 100, catalyst weight (mcat) at 0.2 mg.
Figure 5. The UV–vis absorption spectra during the catalytic reduction of p-NP with (a) CoOOH/rGO and (b) pure CoOOH at different reaction times. Reaction conditions: Initial p-NP concentration (Cp-NP) at 0.125 mmol/L, molar ratio of NaBH4 to p-NP at 100, catalyst weight (mcat) at 0.2 mg.
Materials 15 08862 g005
Materials 15 08862 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Ct/C0 as a function of the reaction time and (b) kinetic analysis over pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO.
Figure 6. (a) Ct/C0 as a function of the reaction time and (b) kinetic analysis over pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO.
Materials 15 08862 g006
Materials 15 08862 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Plots of −ln (Ct/C0) versus the reduction time for the catalytic p-NP reduction at different temperatures over CoOOH/rGO. (b) The corresponding Arrhenius plot at different temperatures.
Figure 7. (a) Plots of −ln (Ct/C0) versus the reduction time for the catalytic p-NP reduction at different temperatures over CoOOH/rGO. (b) The corresponding Arrhenius plot at different temperatures.
Materials 15 08862 g007
Materials 15 08862 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) The reusability of CoOOH/rGO for the catalytic reduction of p-NP. (b) SEM image of CoOOH/rGO after the reduction of p-NP.
Figure 8. (a) The reusability of CoOOH/rGO for the catalytic reduction of p-NP. (b) SEM image of CoOOH/rGO after the reduction of p-NP.
Materials 15 08862 g008
Table
Table 1. The surface properties of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO.
Table 1. The surface properties of pure CoOOH and CoOOH/rGO.
SamplesBET Surface Area (m2/g)Total Pore Volume (cc/g)Average Pore Diameter (nm)
pure CoOOH72.60.293.5
CoOOH/rGO68.20.343.4
Table
Table 2. The induction time of CoOOH/rGO and pure CoOOH in the reduction of p-NP a.
Table 2. The induction time of CoOOH/rGO and pure CoOOH in the reduction of p-NP a.
Catalystt0/min
CoOOH/rGOt0 < 0.95
pure CoOOH5.67 < t0 < 6.33
a Based on the reaction results in Figure 6.
Table
Table 3. The mass-normalized rate constants of various catalysts.
Table 3. The mass-normalized rate constants of various catalysts.
CatalystCp-NPCNaBH4wcatkappknor aReference
mMmMg/Lmin−1L·min−1·g−1
Au (small)0.191.370.0030.1544.82[8]
Au (large)0.191.370.0030.037.28[8]
Pt@Ag0.090.010.0160.3621.66[53]
Pd0.071.650.0460.7315.80[10]
Graphene/Au1.41139.530.4652.004.30[54]
Au/Co@N-C0.2323.430.0312.2571.92[55]
Au/BNO1.6196.770.3232.256.98[56]
AuNi/MoS20.104.760.3181.063.34[3]
rGO-Ag0.2052.870.0801.1814.75[42]
Ag/Co3O40.5453.570.0542.8853.76[57]
Ag-Co/CNFs0.0918.180.3031.033.41[58]
Pd/graphene0.286.980.0930.677.16[35]
CoFe/rGO0.0910.000.6674.616.92[59]
Co/PCNS0.0940.980.0330.319.60[45]
Co/CoO/Co3O4-NC0.140.670.2020.663.29[8]
NiCo2O4/rGO0.5816.670.0830.718.56[40]
CoOx/CN0.3240.000.0800.253.15[60]
Co3O4/HNTs0.1246.400.0330.267.96[30]
Co3O4@C8.338.331.6670.760.45[31]
Co3O40.0415.860.1000.141.41[61]
CoOOH/rGO0.1312.500.0711.7724.78This work
CoOOH0.1312.500.0711.2217.08This work
a The mass-normalized rate constant calculated based on the catalyst amount including the support, as described in Equation (2).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, H.; Yang, M.; Yue, J.; Chen, G. Facile Synthesis of CoOOH Nanorings over Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Application in the Reduction of p-Nitrophenol. Materials 2022, 15, 8862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248862

AMA Style

Chen H, Yang M, Yue J, Chen G. Facile Synthesis of CoOOH Nanorings over Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Application in the Reduction of p-Nitrophenol. Materials. 2022; 15(24):8862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248862

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Huihui, Mei Yang, Jun Yue, and Guangwen Chen. 2022. "Facile Synthesis of CoOOH Nanorings over Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Application in the Reduction of p-Nitrophenol" Materials 15, no. 24: 8862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop