Next Article in Journal
3D Printing of Customizable Phantoms to Replace Cadaveric Models in Upper Extremity Surgical Residency Training
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Mimics: Unexpected Course of the Reaction of Ferrocenyl α-Thienyl Thioketone with Fe3(CO)12
Previous Article in Journal
Recovery of Waste Materials: Technological Research and Industrial Scale-Up
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diels–Alder Cycloaddition with CO, CO2, SO2, or N2 Extrusion: A Powerful Tool for Material Chemistry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anion Recognition by a Pincer-Type Host Constructed from Two Polyamide Macrocyclic Frameworks Jointed by a Photo-Addressable Azobenzene Switch

1
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
2
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(2), 692; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020692
Submission received: 19 December 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Organic Functional Materials)

Abstract

:
A sterically crowded light-responsive host 1 was synthetized with a 93% yield by applying a post-functionalization protocol utilizing the double amidation of 4,4′-azodibenzoyl dichloride with a readily available 26-membered macrocyclic amine. X-ray structures of two hydrates of trans-1 demonstrate a very different alignment of the azobenzene linkage, which is involved in T-shape or parallel-displaced π⋯π stacking interactions with the pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide moieties from the macrocyclic backbone. Despite the rigidity of the macrocyclic framework, which generates a large steric hindrance around the azobenzene chromophore, the host 1 retains the ability to undergo a reversible cistrans isomerization upon irradiation with UVA (368 nm) and blue (410 nm) light. Moreover, thermal cistrans back-isomerization (ΔG0 = 106.5 kJ∙mol−1, t½ = 141 h) is markedly slowed down as compared to the non-macrocyclic analog. 1H NMR titration experiments in DMSO-d6/0.5% water solution reveal that trans-1 exhibits a strong preference for dihydrogenphosphate (H2PO4) over other anions (Cl, MeCO2, and PhCO2), whereas the photogenerated metastable cis-1 shows lower affinity for the H2PO4 anion.

1. Introduction

The recognition and transport of anionic species play a central role in many fundamental chemical, biological, or environmental processes [1,2]. Numerous monographs and review papers on this subject reflect the continuing and growing interest in the supramolecular chemistry of anions [1,2]. In biological systems, anion recognition is highly selective, and it is primarily accomplished in a tailored binding cavity by multiple directional hydrogen bonds derived from amide and hydroxyl groups of amino acid residues [3,4,5,6]. Molecular recognition can be aided by additional and less-directional ionic, ion-π, hydrophobic, and stacking interactions [7,8]. Together, all of these interactions allow for the complete separation of the often initially highly solvated guest molecule from the external environment [9,10].
In artificial molecular receptors, a strong and selective binding of anions, such as chloride [11], carboxylates [12,13,14,15], and phosphates [16,17], might be realized by the selection of a proper molecular platform and decorating it with neutral (thio)amide [18,19,20], (thio)urea [19,20,21,22], pyrrole [23,24], and/or cationic ammonium [25], guanidinium [14,26], and imidazolium [27,28] binding groups. Despite enormous progress in the field of anion supramolecular chemistry in recent decades [1,2,19,29,30,31], the prediction of exact anion affinity and selectivity of a designed receptor is still a challenging task due to difficulties in simulating the correct contribution of solvation and entropy effects on the stability of the supramolecular receptor–anion complex [9,32,33,34,35,36,37]. This is particularly relevant for the more demanding chiral anion recognition, as the differences in Gibbs free energy between diastereomeric complexes are usually expected not to exceed 2 kcal∙mol−1.
It is therefore warranted to undertake further research focused on the design, synthesis, and evaluation of the binding properties of novel synthetic anion receptors. Such studies will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the anion complexation process and to the identification of regularities, enabling the better design of effective receptors.
Based on our work on the supramolecular recognition of anions by neutral macrocyclic tetraamides [38,39,40], we have introduced more structurally elaborate macrocyclic systems named ‘unclosed cryptands’ (UCs) [41], which contain an additional substituent (lariat arm) installed in a sterically demanding intra-annular position (Figure 1).
The lariat arm, apart from bringing extra hydrogen bond functionality, introduces a steric hindrance to the binding cavity and further pre-organizes the macrocyclic framework [41,42,43,44]. To date, this robust macrocyclic platform has been utilized for the construction of potent and selective anion receptors [41,45,46,47,48,49], phase transfer catalysts (PTC) [50,51], and closely packed molecular hosts for solid-state stabilization of transient supramolecular assemblies such as water clusters [52,53,54] and S⋯S chalcogen bonds [55]. Recently, we have developed practical and productive methods for the synthesis of these systems, using templated-macrocyclization protocols [48,55,56] and post-macrocyclization incorporation of lariat arms under mild conditions [43,46,47,56,57]. The latter strategy was utilized in the construction of a sterically crowded pincer-type system [57] acting as anion receptor for mono- and dicarboxylates. Such systems, having two macrocyclic units connected by flexible aliphatic or rigid aryl linkers, are likely not accessible using typical macrocyclization protocols due to the extensive formation of oligomeric byproducts.
In the present study, we decided to expand the family of pincer-type hosts by synthesizing a novel member 1 that contains a photo-responsive linker in place of the non-dynamic linker used previously (Scheme 1) [57]. Conceptually, such structural changes enable the modification of the anion-binding properties of the host by a non-invasive and clean light stimulus [58,59,60,61,62,63].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and General Methods

All reagents and solvents were obtained from common suppliers and have been used as received. TLC was carried out on Merck Kieselgel F254 plates (Merck, Germany). Melting points were determined using a Boëtius M HMK hot-stage apparatus (Franz Küstner Nachf. KG, Dresden, Germany) and were uncorrected. The NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Mercury 400 instrument (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) and Varian-Agilent 500 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) instruments. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm (δ) and are set to the solvent residue peak (DMSO). J coupling constant values are reported in Hz. Mass spectral analyses were performed with the ESI-TOF technique on a Mariner mass spectrometer from PerSeptive Biosystem (Waltham, MA, USA). Macrocyclic amine 4 was prepared according to the previously reported procedure [56].

2.2. Synthethesis of Bis(N-{4,11,17,24-tetraoxo-2,26-dioxa-5,10,18,23,32-pentaazatricyclo[25.3.1.1¹²,¹⁶]dotriaconta-1(31),12(32),13,15,27,29-hexaen-31-yl}-4-[(1E)-2-[4-({4,11,17,24-tetraoxo-2,26-dioxa-5,10,18,23,32-pentaazatricyclo[25.3.1.1¹²,¹⁶]dotriaconta-1(31),12(32),13,15,27,29-hexaen-31-yl}carbamoyl)phenyl]diazen-1-yl]benzamide) (Trans-1)

Anhydrous HCl (~4 M solution in dioxane, 0.40 mL, ~1.6 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C to a solution of macrocyclic amine 4 (0.20 g, 0.33 mmol) in DCM (5 mL), resulting in the rapid precipitation of the hydrochloride salt. External cooling was removed, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled again to 0 °C and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.37 mL, 2.12 mmol) and azobenzene-4,4′-dicarbonyl dichloride (0.18 mmol) were added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5 h. Afterwards, the solvent was evaporated under vacuum, and the remaining solid residue was purified employing column chromatography and using a DCM-methanol mixture [99:1→95:5, v/v] as the eluent. Obtained orange oil containing trans-1∙DIPEA-HCl complex was redissolved in methanol and precipitated using water. The suspension was then sonicated for 0.5 h, filtered, and finally dried, yielding the target product trans-1 (0.19 g, 0.15 mmol, 93%) in the form of an orange solid.
For the hydrogen bond atom labeling, see Scheme 1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.24 (s, 2H, label 1), 9.38 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H, label 10), 8.23–8.10 (m, 14H, labels 5, 11–12, 14), 7.33 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 4H, label 14), 7.27 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H, label 3), 6.76 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H, label 2), 4.61 (s, 8H, label 4), 3.26–3.13 (m, 16H, labels 6, 9), 1.47 (bs, 16H, labels 7–8). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.4, 165.3, 162.8, 153.0, 152.8, 148.9, 139.2, 136.2, 129.3, 127.9, 124.1, 121.9, 114.6, 105.3, 66.9, 38.8, 37.9, 26.3, 26.2. HRMS ESI (m/z) calc. for C64H69N14O14 [M–H]: 1257.5118, found: 1257.5120.

2.3. Preparation of Host Cis-1

Metastable cis-1 was prepared as a trans/cis mixture (containing 10–11% cis-1 as deduced by the 1H NMR integrals) by irradiating a trans-1 solution in DMSO (c = 5 μM, UV-Vis experiments) or DMSO-d6 (c = ~10 mM, 1H NMR experiments) with a UVA-light (Hg lamp, λmax = 365 nm) for 2–5 min or 30 min, respectively. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.96 (s, 2H, label 1), 7.97 (m, 4H, label 10), 7.94 (m, 8H, label 11), 7.82 (m, 4H, labels 5, 12), 7.61 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 4H, label 3), 7.50 (m, 8H, label 2), 6.70 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H, label 13), 6.33 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H, label 14), 4.55 (s, 8H, label 4), 3.07–3.05 (bd, 16H, labels 6, 9), 1.23 (bs, 16H, labels 7–8).

2.4. Computational Calculations

The lowest energy conformations of free hosts trans-1 and cis-1 and their complexes with H2PO4 were found after conducting a conformational search analysis using the Spartan’20 Parallel [64] suite as previously described [58,62]. The selected conformers with the lowest energies were then optimized without any constraints at the DFT/B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d)/C-PCM:DMSO level of theory using the Spartan’20 Parallel Suite program [64].

2.5. Crystal Structures Measurements

Single crystals of trans-1∙(H2O)2∙MeOH suitable for X-ray crystallographic analysis were obtained by the slow diffusion of water into a solution of trans-1 in methanol. The X-ray measurement of the selected monocrystal was carried out at 100(2) K on a Bruker D8 Venture Photon100 diffractometer equipped with a TRIUMPH monochromator and a MoKα fine focus sealed tube (λ = 0.71073 Å). A total of 1740 frames were collected with the Bruker APEX2 program [65], and the frames were integrated with the Bruker SAINT [66] software package using a narrow-frame algorithm. Data were corrected for absorption effects using the multi-scan method (SADABS) [67], and the structure was solved and refined using the SHELXTL [68] Software Package. Crystal data for trans-1∙(H2O)2∙MeOH: C65.05H78.22N14O18.66, Mr = 1354.84, orange prism, 0.26 × 0.19 × 0.06 mm3, monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 11.9554(8) Å, b = 10.5001(7) Å, c = 26.6855(17) Å, β = 91.1152(17)°, V = 3349.3(4) Å3, Z = 2, Dc = 1.343 g/cm3, μ(MoKα) = 0.71073 Å, 55282 reflections measured, 5919 unique, 485 parameters, R = 0.0436, wR = 0.1013 (R = 0.0622, wR = 0.1129, all data). GooF = 1.020. CCDC 2128868.
Single crystals of trans-1∙(H2O)3 suitable for X-ray crystallographic analysis were obtained by a slow diffusion of water into a solution of trans-1 and TBAH2PO4 in DMSO-d6/H2O obtained during the binding studies. The X-ray measurement of the selected monocrystal was carried out at 100 K on a SuperNova Agilent diffractometer using CuKα (λ = 1.54184 Å) radiation. Data reduction was performed with CrysAlisPro (Agilent Technologies, Version 1.171.35.21b). The structures were solved by SUPERFLIP [69] and refined using the SHELXL [68] Software Package. Crystal data for trans-1∙(H2O)3: C64H70N14O20, Mr = 1355.34, orange plate, 0.2 × 0.1 × 0.02 mm3, triclinic, space group P-1, a = 10.9112(5), b = 13.2394(6), c = 14.1760(6) Å; α = 91.363(4)°, β = 07.882(4)o, γ = 102.458(4)°, V = 1894.4(1) Å3, Z = 1, Dc = 1.188 g/cm3, μ(CuKα) = 0.755 Å, 12375 reflections measured, 7075 unique, 472 parameters, R = 0.074, wR = 0.209 (R = 0.1, wR = 0.225, all data). GooF = 1.089. CCDC 2121303.
The supplementary crystallographic data for this article (CCDC 2102842 and 2102846) were deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre at www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 18 December 2021) and can be obtained free of charge, by e-mailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44(0)1223-336033). For crystal data and structure refinement details, see Supplementary Materials.

2.6. Titration Experiments

Commercially available tetrabutylammonium salts (TBACl, TBAMeCO2, TBAPhCO2, and TBAH2PO4) were used as received. HPLC-.grade water was added to the commercially available DMSO-d6 of 99.9% isotopic purity to obtain the appropriate solvent mixture (DMSO-d6-H2O 99.5:0.5% v/v). The host solution was titrated in an NMR tube with the solution of the respective TBA salt in receptor aliquots (details are given in Supplementary Materials). The binding constants were calculated from the changes in the chemical shifts of the amide, aliphatic, and aryl CH protons of the receptor, and from the shifts of the salt protons (aliphatic groups of the TBA cation, and the CH aryls and methyl group of benzoate and acetate anions, respectively). Non-linear curve fitting of the experimental data was carried out with the HypNMR 2008 [70,71,72] (Version 4.0.71) program using a global binding model approach [73,74]. For the determination of binding constants for cis-1, the procedure was as follows: firstly, the binding constants for the pure trans-1 were determined in a separate experiment. The experiment was then repeated using a photogenerated trans/cis mixture, and fixed values for trans-1 were used to fit the experimental data, allowing for the determination of the binding constants for cis-1. Using unconstrained data for trans-1 produced similar results, supporting the validity of the used approach. The exact cis-1 concentration was determined using the 1H NMR integrals and was found to be constant over the course of the experiment. Two binding models for cis-1 were tested, i.e., 1:1 and mixed 1:1 + 1:2 (host:guest). Since both models predict a similar Ka,1 value for cis-1 and comparable binding isotherms, the simpler binding model was considered.

3. Results and Discussion

On the basis of our previous work on acyclic [60,61,62,75] and macrocyclic [58] photoswitchable hosts for ionic guests, we chose to use the symmetrically substituted azobenzene (AB) scaffold as a robust and reversible dynamic linker [63,76,77,78]. Preliminary considerations suggest the selection of a para-substituted azobenzene linker due to the possible large steric restrictions of the designed system having ortho and meta-substituted linkers.
A synthesis approach for the engineered host 1 is shown in Scheme 1.
The required dihydrochloride salt of 26-membered macrocyclic amine 7 was prepared, as shown in Scheme 1a, in an overall 45% yield by following the reported protocol and using commercially available 2-nitroresorcinol 2 and dimethyl 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate 3 as starting materials [56]. Briefly, one nitro group of 2 was catalytically reduced over 10% Pd/C in MeOH to 2-aminoresorcinol, which was reacted with Boc2O in a water–acetone mixture. The subsequent double O-alkylation delivered the α,ω-diester 3 with an overall yield of 78%. Dihydrochloride salt 7 was obtained by amidation of 4 in neat 1,4-diaminobutane, followed by the acidification of the so-obtained diamine with hydrochloric acid in methanol. Compounds 3 and 5 were submitted to chloride-templated macrocyclization [48,56,79,80,81,82] to produce N-Boc-protected macrocyclic compound 6 with good yield (61%), which, upon treatment with methanolic HCl, gave intermediate diamine 7.
The target compound 1 was synthetized with a very good 93% yield as a thermodynamically stable trans isomer by reaction between commercially available 4,4′-azodibenzoyl dichloride 8 and two equivalents of diamine 7 in refluxing MeCN in the presence of triethylamine (Scheme 1b). The yield for the host 1 is considerably higher as compared to double amidation using shorter aliphatic and aryl linkers (55–68%) [57], indicating the expected lower steric repulsion during the synthesis of 1.
The monocrystals of 1 suitable for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained by a slow diffusion of water into a solution of trans-1 in methanol (Figure 2a, solvate a) or into a solution of trans-1 and TBAH2PO4 in DMSO-d6/H2O (Figure 2b, solvate b).
An analysis of the crystal structures of both solvates a and b reveals a different alignment of the linker with the T-shape (solvate a, dπ⋯π,min = 3.43 Å) or parallel-displaced (solvate b, dπ⋯π = 3.3–3.6 Å) π⋯π stacking interactions between AB and pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide moieties of the same molecule. In both solvates, the AB unit is planar, whereas the adjacent carboxamide groups are twisted by 22.7° (solvate a) and −41.2° (solvate b) from the azobenzene plane. The reduced π-conjugation of the NHCO-AB moiety in solvate b is reflected by the shorter N=N bond (d = 1.245 vs. 1.247 Å for solvate b and a, respectively).
Further examination of the X-ray structures shows the preorganization of eight macrocyclic amide protons facing inward to the rigid macrocyclic cavity, while lariat amide protons face outward. The conformation of the macrocyclic backbone in both crystal structures is stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonding C(O1)⋯H-N(2) (dO1⋯N2 = 2.84 and 2.97 Å for solvates a and b, respectively). The host 1 in solvate a exhibits hydrogen bonding of two amide NH protons of the pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide moiety to the carbonyl C=O(3′) group of the neighboring macrocycle (dN4/N6⋯ O3′ = 2.94, 3.01 Å), while in solvate b, the 2,6-dicarboxamide protons bind the water molecule OW1 (dON4/6⋯OW1 = 2.99, 3.03 Å), which additionally interacts with the carbonyl C=O(1) group (dO1⋯OW1 = 2.83 Å).
Despite these differences, the conformation of the macrocyclic backbone in both solvates is comparable, indicating that the steric requirements of the rigid macrocycle scaffold have a major role in the packing of such molecules in the solid state.
In the next step, the photoswitching properties of the host 1 in DMSO were investigated (Scheme 2). The metastable host cis-1 was obtained as a cis-enriched mixture by the irradiation of a DMSO solution of trans-1 (c = 50 μM) with a UVA light (Hg lamp, λmax = 368 nm).
1H NMR experiments using photoirradiated samples of the host 1 (c = 5–10 mM) in a pure DMSO-d6 or in a DMSO-d6-H2O (99.5:0.5 v/v) solvent mixture reveal that, in a photostationary state, the content of the cis-isomer is relatively low (10–12%). Shinkai, Manabe, and co-workers [83] reported that the UV-photoirradiation of structurally related acyclic 4,4′-bis-N-phenylcarbamoylazobenzene 9 in a o-dichlorobenzene-DMF (91:9 v/v) solvent mixture yields only 28% of the cis isomer (Scheme 3).
In addition to a substantial steric hindrance of the host 1, this may suggest extensive overlapping absorption bands for the trans and cis isomers for this type of azobenzene photosensitizer. Nevertheless, trans and cis isomers of 1 exhibit distinct spectral properties, and two isosbestic points in the UV-Vis spectra indicate that only one process is present during both photo (transcis and cistrans) and thermal cistrans isomerization (Scheme 2b). In addition, after several cycles of alternate irradiation with UVA and visible light (Blue LED, λmax = 410 nm), the host 1 exhibits very good recoverability without any signs of photodegradation products (Scheme 2c). The activation entropy and enthalpy associated with the thermal cistrans isomerization have been determined using the Eyring equation. The host 1 demonstrates positive enthalpy of activation (ΔH = 104.8 kJ∙mol−1) and negative entropy of activation (ΔS = −5.7 J∙mol−1∙K−1). Since TΔS is relatively small (−1.7 kJ∙mol−1 at 298K), the Gibbs free energy of activation ΔG is particularly high (ΔG = 106.5 kJ∙mol−1), and so the host 1 demonstrates slow thermal cistrans isomerization (k = 2.86∙10−6 s−1 and τ½ = 141 h at 298K). For comparison, acyclic compound 9 exhibits a much faster thermal decay (see Scheme k = 1.58∙10−5 s−1 vs. 2.85∙10−6 s−1 for compounds 9 and 1, respectively) [83]. This supports the assumption that substantial rotational restrictions, forced by the macrocyclic ring strain, increase the steric hindrance around the azobenzene moiety, raising the thermal activation energy of the back-isomerisation.
The solution-binding properties of trans-1 were determined by 1H NMR titration experiments in a DMSO-d6-water (99.5:0.5 v/v) solvent mixture. Non-coordinating and bulky tetrabutylammonium (TBA) salts of spherical chloride (Cl, pKa < 1), Y-shaped carboxylates: acetate (MeCO2, pKa = 4.76) and benzoate (PhCO2, pKa = 4.20), and tetrahedral dihydrogen phosphate (H2PO4, pKa = 2.14), acting as a dual hydrogen bond donor and acceptor, were selected as model anions featuring diverse basicities and shapes. The addition of anion aliquots caused downfield shifts of the all-amide NH resonances (i.e., 1, 5, and 10; see Scheme 1 for labels) and mixed up or downfield shifts of aryl CH resonances. Downfield shifts of NH protons are indicative of hydrogen bonding interactions with bound anions, while the mixed behavior of CH aryl protons is the result of multiple effects, such as electron density and/or conformational changes [41,60,84].
The corresponding binding isotherms, except chloride and acetate, were fitted using a mixed 1:1 and 1:2 [host:guest] binding model [85,86] and calculated association constants (Ka’s) are listed in Table 1.
The data presented in Table 1 show that the host trans-1 binds H2PO4 with a very high affinity and a remarkable selectivity as compared to other tested anions, including a smaller and much more basic MeCO2 (a = 216; see footnote of Table 1 for definition).
The origin of high selectivity for H2PO4 is, among other factors, related to the dual hydrogen bond donor and acceptor properties of this anion [17]. Previous studies on UC-type receptors suggest that internal hydrogen bonding between amide groups is preserved in a solution (such as C=O(1)⋯HN(7) present in the X-ray crystal structures of trans-1; see Figure 2) [41,47,49,53,54]. Such an internal hydrogen bond has to be broken prior to the binding of Cl and carboxylates, which are hydrogen bond acceptors, to provide the proper binding conformation in which the N(2) amide proton is directed inwards toward the binding pocket. However, for binding of H2PO4, this is not mandatory since this anion could also utilize P-OH groups to interact with the C=O(1) moiety as an H-bond donor, thus preserving the internal C=O(1)⋯HN(7) hydrogen bond.
It is worth emphasizing that, in biological systems, the specialized proteins employ a similar binding approach to binding phosphates with high selectivity [5,16,87]. However, in the development of the synthetic molecular receptors for H2PO4, this approach has been rarely employed [88,89,90,91,92,93,94].
Receptor trans-1 shows a very low affinity for chloride (Ka < 10 M−1), which is consistent with previous studies showing that spherical chloride does not match the 26-membered macrocyclic ring [53,57]. On the other hand, hosts possessing a smaller, 24-member macrocyclic ring show a very high affinity and selectivity for chloride [41,48,49].
Furthermore, as previously observed [57], trans-1 displays a higher binding affinity for PhCO2 over the smaller and more basic MeCO2 (Ka,1(PhCO2)/Ka,1(MeCO2) = 7.6). It is likely that this uncommon anti-Hofmeister-type selectivity [95,96] results from the favorable π⋯π interactions between the aromatic subunits of the host 1 and the benzoate [47,97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. The literature suggests that this effect occurs for receptors containing a hydrophobic pocket in their structures [47,97,98,99,100,101,102].
The anion-binding properties of host cis-1 were studied in detail only for H2PO4 since other tested anions induce marginal shifts of the amide NH and aryl CH resonances, indicating very weak binding. Upon the addition of TBAH2PO4 to the trans/cis 1 mixture solution, the signals corresponding to the cis isomer protons shifted slightly upfield, suggesting that steric crowding is significant during the binding process (Figure S10). This in turn reduces the anion-binding affinity of a curved cis-1 and deactivates the possible cooperative effect of two adjacent macrocyclic cavities. Likewise, the binding affinity of cis-1 toward H2PO4 (Ka = 347 M−1) was found to be substantially lower than for trans-1.
To obtain better insights into the reduced binding affinity of cis-1 toward H2PO4 in solution, we performed DFT calculations using B3LYP-D3 combined with a 6-31G(d) basis set and C-PCM model (DMSO, ε = 46.83) to approximate the solvent effects. The energy-minimized conformation of the complex of cis-1 with H2PO4 is demonstrated in Figure 3.
The results of DFT calculations indicate compactness of the anion complex structure. The H2PO4 guest is engaged in four hydrogen bond interactions with the host cis-1. The conformation of the anionic complex is further stabilized by numerous intramolecular hydrogen bonding interactions that hinder the binding of the second guest. These results indicate that intramolecular hydrogen bonding and increased crowding cause the host 1 to be unable to adopt an optimal conformation to bind the H2PO4, resulting in the decreased stability of the complex.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a new member of sterically crowded, pincer-type polyamide anion hosts containing a photoswitchable 4,4′-di-substituted azobenzene linker was prepared in high yield by adopting the mild and straightforward post-functionalization protocol. The crystal structure analysis of trans-1 reveals that, apart from the large steric hindrance in the system, the azobenzene linkage is involved in T-shape or parallel-displaced π⋯π stacking interactions with the pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide moieties from the macrocyclic backbone. The rigidity of the macrocyclic framework does not hamper the ability of the host 1 to undergo a reversible cistrans isomerization upon irradiation with UVA (368 nm) and blue (410 nm) light, while it slows down the thermal cistrans back-isomerization (ΔG0 = 106.5 kJ∙mol−1, t½ = 141 h). 1H NMR titration experiments in DMSO-d6/0.5% water solution reveal that trans-1 exhibits a remarkable preference for dihydrogenphosphate (H2PO4) over other anions (Cl, MeCO2, and PhCO2), whereas the photogenerated metastable cis-1 shows a decrease in binding affinity for the H2PO4 anion.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15020692/s1, File S1: Copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compound 1, computational details, X-ray crystallographic data, and titration experiments for the host 1 with anions. Files S2 and S3: check CIF files for trans-1∙(H2O)2∙MeOH and trans-1∙(H2O)2. CCDC 2128868 and 2121303 references contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 18 December 2021), by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.D.; methodology, K.D. and P.N.; validation, P.N. and K.D.; formal analysis, P.N. and K.D.; investigation, P.N., M.M., M.C., W.I. and K.D.; resources, K.D. and J.J.; data curation, P.N. and K.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.N. and K.D.; writing—review and editing, P.N., K.D. and J.J.; visualization, P.N. and K.D.; supervision, K.D. and J.J.; project administration, K.D. and J.J.; funding acquisition, K.D. and J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by 2018/29/B/ST5/01366 (J.J.) and UMO-2016/23/D/ST5/03301 (K.D.) projects, funded by Poland’s National Science Centre (NCN).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The X-ray structure trans-1∙(H2O)2∙MeOH was determined in the Advanced Crystal Engineering Laboratory (aceLAB) at the Chemistry Department of the University of Warsaw by Łukasz Dobrzycki.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, L.J.; Berry, S.N.; Wu, X.; Howe, E.N.W.; Gale, P.A. Advances in Anion Receptor Chemistry. Chem 2020, 6, 61–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, J.; Yang, D.; Yang, X.-J.; Wu, B. Anion coordination chemistry: From recognition to supramolecular assembly. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 378, 415–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dutzler, R.; Campbell, E.B.; Cadene, M.; Chait, B.T.; MacKinnon, R. X-ray structure of a ClC chloride channel at 3.0 Å reveals the molecular basis of anion selectivity. Nature 2002, 415, 287–294. Available online: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6869/suppinfo/415287a_S1.html (accessed on 18 December 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hedstrom, L. Serine Protease Mechanism and Specificity. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4501–4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Luecke, H.; Quiocho, F.A. High specificity of a phosphate transport protein determined by hydrogen bonds. Nature 1990, 347, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pflugrath, J.W.; Quiocho, F.A. Sulphate sequestered in the sulphate-binding protein of Salmonella typhimurium is bound solely by hydrogen bonds. Nature 1985, 314, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J.; Frontera, A. Not Only Hydrogen Bonds: Other Noncovalent Interactions. Crystals 2020, 10, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Molina, P.; Zapata, F.; Caballero, A. Anion Recognition Strategies Based on Combined Noncovalent Interactions. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9907–9972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.; Parks, F.C.; Sheetz, E.G.; Chen, C.-H.; Flood, A.H. Polarity-Tolerant Chloride Binding in Foldamer Capsules by Programmed Solvent-Exclusion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 3191–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernández, A.; Crespo, A. Protein wrapping: A molecular marker for association, aggregation and drug design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2373–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dabrowa, K.; Ulatowski, F.; Lichosyt, D.; Jurczak, J. Catching the chloride: Searching for non-Hofmeister selectivity behavior in systematically varied polyamide macrocyclic receptors. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 5927–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ulatowski, F.; Jurczak, J. Chiral Recognition of Carboxylates—Receptors, Analytical Tools, and More. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Niedbała, P.; Dąbrowa, K.; Wasiłek, S.; Jurczak, J. Recognition of Chiral Carboxylates by Synthetic Receptors. Molecules 2021, 26, 6417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Blondeau, P.; Segura, M.; Perez-Fernandez, R.; de Mendoza, J. Molecular recognition of oxoanions based on guanidinium receptors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fitzmaurice, R.J.; Kyne, G.M.; Douheret, D.; Kilburn, J.D. Synthetic receptors for carboxylic acids and carboxylates. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 7, 841–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hirsch, A.K.; Fischer, F.R.; Diederich, F. Phosphate recognition in structural biology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007, 46, 338–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hargrove, A.E.; Nieto, S.; Zhang, T.; Sessler, J.L.; Anslyn, E.V. Artificial Receptors for the Recognition of Phosphorylated Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 6603–6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kang, S.O.; Begum, R.A.; Bowman-James, K. Amide-based ligands for anion coordination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45, 7882–7894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Manna, U.; Das, G. An overview of anion coordination by hydroxyl, amine and amide based rigid and symmetric neutral dipodal receptors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 427, 213547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dydio, P.; Lichosyt, D.; Jurczak, J. Amide-and urea-functionalized pyrroles and benzopyrroles as synthetic, neutral anion receptors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2971–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Blažek Bregović, V.; Basarić, N.; Mlinarić-Majerski, K. Anion binding with urea and thiourea derivatives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 295, 80–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, A.-F.; Wang, J.-H.; Wang, F.; Jiang, Y.-B. Anion complexation and sensing using modified urea and thiourea-based receptors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3729–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Vargas-Zúñiga, G.I.; Sessler, J.L. Pyrrole N–H anion complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 345, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sessler, J.L.; Camiolo, S.; Gale, P.A. Pyrrolic and polypyrrolic anion binding agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 17–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Llinares, J.M.; Powell, D.; Bowman-James, K. Ammonium based anion receptors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Houk, R.J.; Tobey, S.L.; Anslyn, E.V. Abiotic guanidinium receptors for anion molecular recognition and sensing. Anion Sens. 2005, 255, 199–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Z.; Kim, S.K.; Yoon, J. Revisit to imidazolium receptors for the recognition of anions: Highlighted research during 2006–2009. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1457–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yoon, J.; Kim, S.K.; Singh, N.J.; Kim, K.S. Imidazolium receptors for the recognition of anions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Taylor, M.S. Anion recognition based on halogen, chalcogen, pnictogen and tetrel bonding. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 413, 213270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pancholi, J.; Beer, P.D. Halogen bonding motifs for anion recognition. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 416, 213281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, X.; Gilchrist, A.M.; Gale, P.A. Prospects and Challenges in Anion Recognition and Transport. Chem 2020, 6, 1296–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zimnicka, M.; Kozłowska, K.; Danikiewicz, W. Beyond Size Complementary Factors in Anion–Tetralactam Macrocycle Complexes: From Intrinsic Gas-Phase to Solvent-Predicted Stabilities. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 8990–9000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sherbow, T.J.; Fargher, H.A.; Haley, M.M.; Pluth, M.D.; Johnson, D.W. Solvent-Dependent Linear Free-Energy Relationship in a Flexible Host–Guest System. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 12367–12373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, Y.; Sengupta, A.; Raghavachari, K.; Flood, A.H. Anion binding in solution: Beyond the electrostatic regime. Chem 2017, 3, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Sengupta, A.; Liu, Y.; Flood, A.H.; Raghavachari, K. Anion-Binding Macrocycles Operate Beyond the Electrostatic Regime: Interaction Distances Matter. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 14409–14417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cockroft, S.L. Screening Solvent Effects in Anion Recognition. Chem 2017, 3, 383–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jeanmairet, G.; Levesque, M.; Borgis, D. Tackling Solvent Effects by Coupling Electronic and Molecular Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 7123–7134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chmielewski, M.J.; Jurczak, J. Anion Binding versus Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding in Neutral Macrocyclic Amides. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 7652–7667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chmielewski, M.J.; Jurczak, J. Anion Recognition by Neutral Macrocyclic Amides. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6080–6094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chmielewski, M.; Jurczak, J. Size complementarity in anion recognition by neutral macrocyclic tetraamides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6007–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dąbrowa, K.; Pawlak, M.; Duszewski, P.; Jurczak, J. “Unclosed Cryptands”: A Point of Departure for Developing Potent Neutral Anion Receptors. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 6298–6301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jurczak, J.; Sobczuk, A.; Dąbrowa, K.; Lindner, M.; Niedbała, P.; Stepniak, P. Chirality of 20-membered unclosed cryptand: Macroring distortion via lariat arm modification. Chirality 2018, 30, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jurczak, J.; Sobczuk, A.; Da Browa, K.; Lindner, M.; Niedbala, P. An Indirect Synthetic Approach toward Conformationally Constrained 20-Membered Unclosed Cryptands via Late-Stage Installation of Intraannular Substituents. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 13560–13567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ziach, K.; Dąbrowa, K.; Niedbała, P.; Kalisiak, J.; Jurczak, J. Exploration of structural motifs influencing solid-state conformation and packing of unclosed cryptands sharing the same 19-membered macrocyclic core. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 8373–8381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Niedbała, P.; Jurczak, J. Effective synthetic strategy towards highly selective macrocyclic anion receptors based on static combinatorial chemistry. Tetrahedron 2020, 76, 131693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Niedbała, P.; Jurczak, J. One-Pot Parallel Synthesis of Unclosed Cryptands—Searching for Selective Anion Receptors via Static Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 26271–26277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Niedbała, P.; Majdecki, M.; Dąbrowa, K.; Jurczak, J. Selective Carboxylate Recognition Using Urea-Functionalized Unclosed Cryptands: Mild Synthesis and Complexation Studies. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 5058–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dąbrowa, K.; Lindner, M.; Tyszka-Gumkowska, A.; Jurczak, J. Imino-thiolate-templated synthesis of a chloride-selective neutral macrocyclic host with a specific “turn-off-on” fluorescence response for hypochlorite (ClO). Org. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 5258–5264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dąbrowa, K.; Lindner, M.; Wasiłek, S.; Jurczak, J. Selective Recognition of Chloride by a 24-Membered Macrocyclic Host with a Hydrophobic Methylenepyrene Substituent. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 4528–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tyszka-Gumkowska, A.; Jurczak, J. A General Method for High-Pressure-Promoted Postfunctionalization of Unclosed Cryptands: Potential Phase-Transfer Catalysts. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tyszka-Gumkowska, A.; Jurczak, J. Divergent synthesis of pyrrolidine and glutamic acid derivatives using a macrocyclic phase-transfer catalyst under high-pressure conditions. Org. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 5888–5894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dąbrowa, K.; Ceborska, M.; Jurczak, J. Solid-state entrapment of water clusters by 26-membered pentamide unclosed cryptands –probing the para-substituent effect. Supramol. Chem. 2018, 30, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dąbrowa, K.; Ceborska, M.; Jurczak, J. Trapping of Octameric Water Cluster by the Neutral Unclosed Cryptand Environment. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 4906–4910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dabrowa, K.; Ceborska, M.; Jurczak, J. Stabilization of Near Identical Hydrogen Bonded Octameric Water Clusters in Crystal Structures of Three Distinct Non-Charged Polyamide Macrocyclic Host Molecules. Molecules 2021, 26, 2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dąbrowa, K.; Ceborska, M.; Pawlak, M.; Jurczak, J. Comparative Structural Studies of Four Homologous Thioamidic Unclosed Crytpands: Self-Encapsulation of Lariat Arm, Odd–Even Effects, Anomalously Short S· ·S Chalcogen Bonding, and More. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dabrowa, K.; Niedbala, P.; Majdecki, M.; Duszewski, P.; Jurczak, J. A General Method for Synthesis of Unclosed Cryptands via H-Bond Templated Macrocyclization and Subsequent Mild Postfunctionalization. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4774–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Niedbała, P.; Jurczak, J. A new class of “pincer” receptors–macrocyclic systems containing an incorporated amide group. J. Coord. Chem. 2021, 74, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sokolowska, P.; Dabrowa, K.; Jarosz, S. Visible-Light Responsive Sucrose-Containing Macrocyclic Host for Cations. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2687–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tecilla, P.; Bonifazi, D. Configurational Selection in Azobenzene-Based Supramolecular Systems Through Dual-Stimuli Processes. ChemistryOpen 2020, 9, 538–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dąbrowa, K.; Jurczak, J. Tetra-(meta-butylcarbamoyl) azobenzene: A Rationally Designed Photoswitch with Binding Affinity for Oxoanions in a Long-Lived Z-State. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1378–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dąbrowa, K.; Niedbała, P.; Jurczak, J. Engineering Light-Mediated Bistable Azobenzene Switches Bearing Urea d-Aminoglucose Units for Chiral Discrimination of Carboxylates. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 3576–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Dabrowa, K.; Niedbala, P.; Jurczak, J. Anion-tunable control of thermal Z → E isomerisation in basic azobenzene receptors. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 15748–15751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Lee, S.; Flood, A.H. Photoresponsive receptors for binding and releasing anions. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2013, 26, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Spartan’20 for Windows; Wavefunction Inc.: Irvine, CA, USA, 2020.
  65. APEX2; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2013.
  66. SAINT; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2013.
  67. SADABS; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2012.
  68. Sheldrick, G. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Palatinus, L.; Chapuis, G. SUPERFLIP—A computer program for the solution of crystal structures by charge flipping in arbitrary dimensions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007, 40, 786–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rodríguez-Barrientos, D.; Rojas-Hernández, A.; Gutiérrez, A.; Moya-Hernández, R.; Gómez-Balderas, R.; Ramírez-Silva, M.T. Determination of pKa values of tenoxicam from 1H NMR chemical shifts and of oxicams from electrophoretic mobilities (CZE) with the aid of programs SQUAD and HYPNMR. Talanta 2009, 80, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Frassineti, C.; Alderighi, L.; Gans, P.; Sabatini, A.; Vacca, A.; Ghelli, S. Determination of protonation constants of some fluorinated polyamines by means of 13C NMR data processed by the new computer program HypNMR2000. Protonation sequence in polyamines. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Frassineti, C.; Ghelli, S.; Gans, P.; Sabatini, A.; Moruzzi, M.S.; Vacca, A. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance as a Tool for Determining Protonation Constants of Natural Polyprotic Bases in Solution. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 231, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lowe, A.J.; Pfeffer, F.M.; Thordarson, P. Determining binding constants from 1H NMR titration data using global and local methods: A case study using [n]polynorbornane-based anion hosts. Supramol. Chem. 2012, 24, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Thordarson, P. Determining association constants from titration experiments in supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1305–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ulatowski, F.; Dąbrowa, K.; Jurczak, J. Supramolecular detection of geometrical differences of azobenzene carboxylates. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 1820–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jerca, F.A.; Jerca, V.V.; Hoogenboom, R. Advances and opportunities in the exciting world of azobenzenes. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2022, 6, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Łukasik, N.; Chojnacki, J.; Luboch, E.; Okuniewski, A.; Wagner-Wysiecka, E. Photoresponsive, amide-based derivative of embonic acid for anion recognition. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2020, 390, 112307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wagner-Wysiecka, E.; Łukasik, N.; Biernat, J.F.; Luboch, E. Azo group(s) in selected macrocyclic compounds. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2018, 90, 189–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vidović, N.; Horvat, G.; Riva, D.; Rinkovec, T.; Cindro, N.; Tomišić, V.; Speranza, G. Chloride-Assisted Peptide Macrocyclization. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 2129–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Łęczycka-Wilk, K.; Dabrowa, K.; Cmoch, P.; Jarosz, S. Chloride-Templated Macrocyclization and Anion-Binding Properties of C2-Symmetric Macrocyclic Ureas from Sucrose. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4596–4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Martí-Centelles, V.; Burguete, M.I.; Luis, S.V. Macrocycle Synthesis by Chloride-Templated Amide Bond Formation. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 2143–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Satake, A.; Ishizawa, Y.; Katagiri, H.; Kondo, S.-I. Chloride Selective Macrocyclic Bisurea Derivatives with 2,2′-Binaphthalene Moieties as Spacers. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 9848–9857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Shinkai, S.; Honda, Y.; Minami, T.; Ueda, K.; Manabe, O.; Tashiro, M. Photoresponsive crown ethers. 9. Cylindrical and phane crown ethers with azobenzene segments as a light-switch functional group. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1983, 56, 1700–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Amendola, V.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Mosca, L. Anion recognition by hydrogen bonding: Urea-based receptors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3889–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Brynn Hibbert, D.; Thordarson, P. The death of the Job plot, transparency, open science and online tools, uncertainty estimation methods and other developments in supramolecular chemistry data analysis. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12792–12805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Ulatowski, F.; Dąbrowa, K.; Bałakier, T.; Jurczak, J. Recognizing the Limited Applicability of Job Plots in Studying Host–Guest Interactions in Supramolecular Chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 1746–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, Z.; Choudhary, A.; Ledvina, P.S.; Quiocho, F.A. Fine tuning the specificity of the periplasmic phosphate transport receptor. Site-directed mutagenesis, ligand binding, and crystallographic studies. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 25091–25094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dąbrowa, K.; Niedbała, P.; Pawlak, M.; Lindner, M.; Ignacak, W.; Jurczak, J. Tuning Anion-Binding Properties of 22-Membered Unclosed Cryptands by Structural Modification of the Lariat Arm. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 29601–29608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Cho, J.; Verwilst, P.; Kang, M.; Pan, J.L.; Sharma, A.; Hong, C.S.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, S. Crown ether-appended calix [2] triazolium [2] arene as a macrocyclic receptor for the recognition of the H2PO4 anion. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 1038–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yakimova, L.; Shurpik, D.; Stoikov, I. Amide-functionalized pillar [5] arenes as a novel class of macrocyclic receptors for the sensing of H2PO4 anion. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12462–12465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Deliomeroglu, M.K.; Lynch, V.M.; Sessler, J.L. Non-cyclic formylated dipyrromethanes as phosphate anion receptors. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3843–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Kataev, E.A.; Shumilova, T.A. Investigation of structural mimetics of natural phosphate ion binding motifs. Molecules 2015, 20, 3354–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Kondo, S.; Takai, R. Selective detection of dihydrogen phosphate anion by fluorescence change with tetraamide-based receptors bearing isoquinolyl and quinolyl moieties. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 538–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mahanta, S.P.; Kumar, B.S.; Panda, P.K. Meso-diacylated calix [4] pyrrole: Structural diversities and enhanced binding towards dihydrogenphosphate ion. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4496–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Martin, K.; Nõges, J.; Haav, K.; Kadam, S.A.; Pung, A.; Leito, I. Exploring Selectivity of 22 Acyclic Urea-, Carbazole- and Indolocarbazole-Based Receptors towards 11 Monocarboxylates. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 5231–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kadam, S.A.; Martin, K.; Haav, K.; Toom, L.; Mayeux, C.; Pung, A.; Gale, P.A.; Hiscock, J.R.; Brooks, S.J.; Kirby, I.L.; et al. Towards the Discrimination of Carboxylates by Hydrogen-Bond Donor Anion Receptors. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 5145–5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chang, K.-C.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lin, T.-P.; Ku, P.-J.; Chen, C.-L.; Wang, C.-M.; Lin, H.-M.; Tseng, M.-C.; Singh, A.S.; Sun, S.-S. Platinum (II)-directed Self-assembly Loop Complexes for Anion Recognition and Sensing. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2018, 65, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hudeček, O.; Budka, J.; Dvořáková, H.; Cuřínová, P.; Císařová, I.; Lhoták, P. Anion receptors based on ureidocalix [4] arenes immobilised in the partial cone conformation. New J. Chem. 2013, 37, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Young, P.G.; Jolliffe, K.A. Selective recognition of sulfate ions by tripodal cyclic peptides functionalised with (thio)urea binding sites. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 2664–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Casnati, A.; Sansone, F.; Ungaro, R. Peptido- and Glycocalixarenes:  Playing with Hydrogen Bonds around Hydrophobic Cavities. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sansone, F.; Baldini, L.; Casnati, A.; Lazzarotto, M.; Ugozzoli, F.; Ungaro, R. Biomimetic macrocyclic receptors for carboxylate anion recognition based on C-linked peptidocalix [4] arenes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4842–4847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Lazzarotto, M.; Sansone, F.; Baldini, L.; Casnati, A.; Cozzini, P.; Ungaro, R. Synthesis and Properties of Upper Rim C-Linked Peptidocalix [4] arenes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 3, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Beer, P.D. Solvent dependent anion selectivity exhibited by neutral ferrocenoyl receptors. Chem. Commun. 1997, 24, 2377–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Examples of molecular structures and applications of polyamidic macrocyclic systems based on the unclosed cryptand platform; hydrogen bond donor and acceptor groups are colored in green.
Figure 1. Examples of molecular structures and applications of polyamidic macrocyclic systems based on the unclosed cryptand platform; hydrogen bond donor and acceptor groups are colored in green.
Materials 15 00692 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of macrocyclic amine 4 (a) and sterically C2-symmetrical crowded pincer-type host trans-1 by adopting an efficient post-functionalization strategy (b).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of macrocyclic amine 4 (a) and sterically C2-symmetrical crowded pincer-type host trans-1 by adopting an efficient post-functionalization strategy (b).
Materials 15 00692 sch001
Figure 2. The X-ray crystal structures of solvate s of trans-1, exemplifying T-shape (a, solvate a) or parallel-displaced (b, solvate b) π-π stacking interactions between azobenzene and pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide moieties; non-acidic protons, non-relevant solvent molecules and disorder have been omitted for clarity.
Figure 2. The X-ray crystal structures of solvate s of trans-1, exemplifying T-shape (a, solvate a) or parallel-displaced (b, solvate b) π-π stacking interactions between azobenzene and pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide moieties; non-acidic protons, non-relevant solvent molecules and disorder have been omitted for clarity.
Materials 15 00692 g002
Scheme 2. Photoswitching of host 1 in DMSO (50 μM) at 298.0 ± 0.1 K: schematic representation (a), UV-Vis spectra of pure trans-1 and photoirradiated trans/cis mixtures (b), and changes of the absorbance at 344 nm upon alternate irradiation with UVA (Hg lamp 365 nm) and blue light (LED 410 nm); isobestic points in UV-Vis spectra are marked as green circles (c).
Scheme 2. Photoswitching of host 1 in DMSO (50 μM) at 298.0 ± 0.1 K: schematic representation (a), UV-Vis spectra of pure trans-1 and photoirradiated trans/cis mixtures (b), and changes of the absorbance at 344 nm upon alternate irradiation with UVA (Hg lamp 365 nm) and blue light (LED 410 nm); isobestic points in UV-Vis spectra are marked as green circles (c).
Materials 15 00692 sch002
Scheme 3. Molecular structure and photoswitching of structurally related acyclic compound 9 [83].
Scheme 3. Molecular structure and photoswitching of structurally related acyclic compound 9 [83].
Materials 15 00692 sch003
Figure 3. Side (a) and top (b) views of the energy-minimized structure of cis-1-H2PO4 anionic complex (DFT/B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d)/C-PCM:DMSO), illustrating a highly compact host–guest conformation that is stabilized by many intramolecular hydrogen bonds; non-acidic protons have been omitted for clarity.
Figure 3. Side (a) and top (b) views of the energy-minimized structure of cis-1-H2PO4 anionic complex (DFT/B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d)/C-PCM:DMSO), illustrating a highly compact host–guest conformation that is stabilized by many intramolecular hydrogen bonds; non-acidic protons have been omitted for clarity.
Materials 15 00692 g003
Table 1. Stability constants Ka (M−1) and selectivity factor α for host:guest complexes of receptor trans-1 with anions [a].
Table 1. Stability constants Ka (M−1) and selectivity factor α for host:guest complexes of receptor trans-1 with anions [a].
EntryAnionKa (Model H:G) (M−1)α [b]
1Cl<10 (1:1)>560
2MeCO226 (1:1)216
3PhCO2204 (1:1)
9 (1:2)
27
4H2PO45623 (1:1)
240 (1:2)
1
[a] Determined using 1H NMR titration at 298 K and HypNMR 2008 software for nonlinear fitting of the binding data; anions added as TBA salts; estimated errors <10%. [b] α = Ka,1(H2PO4)/Ka,1(anion)—selectivity for H2PO4 over other anions.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niedbała, P.; Ceborska, M.; Mehmet, M.; Ignacak, W.; Jurczak, J.; Dąbrowa, K. Anion Recognition by a Pincer-Type Host Constructed from Two Polyamide Macrocyclic Frameworks Jointed by a Photo-Addressable Azobenzene Switch. Materials 2022, 15, 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020692

AMA Style

Niedbała P, Ceborska M, Mehmet M, Ignacak W, Jurczak J, Dąbrowa K. Anion Recognition by a Pincer-Type Host Constructed from Two Polyamide Macrocyclic Frameworks Jointed by a Photo-Addressable Azobenzene Switch. Materials. 2022; 15(2):692. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020692

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niedbała, Patryk, Magdalena Ceborska, Mart Mehmet, Wiktor Ignacak, Janusz Jurczak, and Kajetan Dąbrowa. 2022. "Anion Recognition by a Pincer-Type Host Constructed from Two Polyamide Macrocyclic Frameworks Jointed by a Photo-Addressable Azobenzene Switch" Materials 15, no. 2: 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020692

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop