Next Article in Journal
Design of Environmentally Friendly Ca-Alginate Beads for Self-Healing Cement-Based Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Early-Stage Geopolymerization Process of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer
Previous Article in Journal
Using Tectona Grandis Biomass to Produce Valuable Adsorbents for Pesticide Removal from Liquid Effluent
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity for Cement, Mortar, and Concrete through a Multiscale Homogenization Approach
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Salt Scaling Resistance of Variable w/c Ratio Air-Entrained Concretes Modified with Polycarboxylates as a Proper Consequence of Air Void System

Materials 2022, 15(17), 5839; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175839
by Aneta Nowak-Michta
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Materials 2022, 15(17), 5839; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175839
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-Scale Structural Characterization of Cement-Based Composites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents a good topic related to. Salt scaling resistance of variable w/c ratio air-entrained concretes modified with polycarboxylates as a proper consequence  of Air Void System. The following attached file to improve the paper before publication.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Reviewer, 

Your work is interesting, however, a lot more work is available in this area. What is the novelty of this study?  The following points need to be incorporated to enhance the quality of paper. 

What is the power model, what are its limitations?

Line 67: define Vp, also all abbreviations and symbols need to be defined as their first appearance. 

What does A300 mean in abstract first line. 

use short sentences while writing. Long sentences confuse the statement. Line 80-85 a single statement, reduce it in short one. 

Figure 1. The grain size distribution of aggregate. The grain size distribution is crossing outside the boundary curves from 0-.126; 0.3 -1.2; 15-32. is it allowed by EN 480-1 code?

Line 159-165; tabular comparison will be easier to understand. 

A flow chart can be drawn mentioning tests name and relative standard for better comprehension.

Heading 3.2 use hardened concrete instead of only concretes. 

Table 4 and 5 can be made together. for linking fresh and hardened properties test. 

Table 7 can be added with Table 6. Concrete quality can be mentioned in table 6. A remarks/ reasoning column can be added as no reason is provided in heading 3.2.1.

heading 4.1 critical discussion and reasoning is missing. It's just reporting the results which are already known in this area. also compare your results from other studies as well. 

Heading 4 graphs can be redrawn more Betterly. 

Conclusions need to be rewritten.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Salt scaling resistance of variable w/c ratio air-entrained concretes modified with polycarboxylates as a proper consequence of Air Void System

Abstract need revision with some quantitative results.

Some more latest studies are required in the introduction section to further highlight the importance of this study. For example:

1. Kubissa, W. (2020). Air permeability of air-entrained hybrid concrete containing CSA cement. Buildings, 10(7), 119.

2. Hodul, J., Žižková, N., & Borg, R. P. (2020). The influence of crystalline admixtures on the properties and microstructure of mortar containing by-products. Buildings, 10(9), 146.

Table 1, how properties were obtained?

Figure 1, how grain size distribution was obtained?

Section 2.2, how concrete mixes were selected, proper reasons are required.

Section 3.1, there is a need to include figure of slump test as well. Further results are not compared with the previous studies.

Section 3.2, the failure modes of compressions tests are required to present along with figures and proper disuccions.

Also, Conclusions are too limited to proof the significant outcome of this study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The author has addressed all the comments of the reviewers. Therefore, the revised manuscript can be accepted for publication in J. Materials

Reviewer 2 Report

paper is much improved and can be accepted.

Back to TopTop