Next Article in Journal
Theoretical and Experimental Study on the Effect of Selected Parameters in a New Method of Extrusion with a Movable Sleeve
Next Article in Special Issue
Direct Observation of the Spin Exciton in Andreev Spectroscopy of Iron-Based Superconductors
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological Analysis of Laser Surface Texturing Effect on AISI 430 Stainless Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Collapse in Fe3Se4 under High Pressure

by
Lyudmila V. Begunovich
1,2,
Maxim M. Korshunov
1,2,* and
Sergey G. Ovchinnikov
1,2
1
Kirensky Institute of Physics, Federal Research Center KSC SB RAS, Akademgorodok 50/38, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
2
Siberian Federal University, Svobodny Prospect 79, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(13), 4583; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134583
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 19 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structures, Properties and Functionalities in Multiferroic Materials)

Abstract

:
Electronic structure and magnetic properties of Fe 3 Se 4 are calculated using the density functional approach. Due to the metallic properties, magnetic moments of the iron atoms in two nonequivalent positions in the unit cell are different from ionic values for Fe 3 + and Fe 2 + and are equal to M 1 = 2.071 μ B and M 2 = 2.042 μ B , making the system ferrimagnetic. The total magnetic moment for the unit cell is 2.135 μ B . Under isotropic compression, the total magnetic moment decreases non-monotonically and correlates with the non-monotonic dependence of the density of states at the Fermi level N ( E F ) . For 7% compression, the magnetic order changes from the ferrimagnetic to the ferromagnetic. At 14% compression, the magnetic order disappears and the total magnetic moment becomes zero, leaving the system in a paramagnetic state. This compression corresponds to the pressure of 114 GPa. The magnetic ordering changes faster upon application of an isotropic external pressure due to the sizeable anisotropy of the chemical bondings in Fe 3 Se 4 . The ferrimagnetic and paramagnetic states occur under pressures of 5.0 and 8.0 GPa, respectively. The system remains in the metallic state for all values of compression.
PACS:
62.50.-p; 71.15.Mb; 75.50.Gg; 75.50.Bb

1. Introduction

Magnetic collapse associated with the disappearance of magnetic moments in 3 d ions is observed in many insulating transition metal oxides (Mn–O, Fe–O, Co–O and Ni–O systems). A review of experimental data for iron oxides [1] revealed that the spin crossover between the high-spin and low-spin states of the cation in most cases takes place with increasing pressure and critical pressure is close to 50–70 GPa. The crystals with Fe 2 + ions have a low-spin state with a zero spin ( S = 0 ) that leads to the appearance of a nonmagnetic phase. In the case of crystals with Fe 3 + ions, the low-spin state exhibit S = 1 / 2 , so the magnetic state can be preserved, albeit at a lower critical temperature, such as in FeBO 3 [2]. For magnetite Fe 3 O 4 containing both Fe 2 + and Fe 3 + ions, a new nonmagnetic phase was experimentally found [3,4] at pressures above 25 GPa and room temperature.
The iron selenides FeSe x ( 1 x 1.33 ) form phases with iron vacancies that crystallize into structures derived from the hexagonal NiAs-type structure. Among them, two compounds, Fe 7 Se 8 and Fe 3 Se 4 , have superstructures with ordered Fe vacancies [5]. Fe 7 Se 8 has a hexagonal structure whereas Fe 3 Se 4 has a monoclinic structure isomorphic to Cr 3 X 4 (X = S, Se, Te). In an Fe 3 Se 4 unit cell, the vacancies of Fe appear in every second iron layer. The presence of ordered Fe vacancies facilitates the appearance of the ferrimagnetic state in Fe 3 Se 4 [6,7,8,9]. The experimental values of the total magnetic moment are in the range from 0.69 μ B to 1.17 μ B per formula unit (f.u.) [6,7,8]. The magnetic moments on Fe ions estimated within the framework of the ionic model [7] are too large ( 3.25 μ B for site 1 and 1.94 μ B for site 2) and are not validated by experimental data [7,9,10]. Neutron diffraction on Fe 3 Se 4 gives smaller effective spin values for two Fe positions, S 1 = 1.08 μ B and S 2 = 0.71 μ B [10]. In addition, a study by Mössbauer revealed the very low average internal magnetic fields for Fe sites [9], which do not correspond to regular high-spin Fe 3 + or Fe 2 + states. All of the abovementioned studies indicate the delocalization of 3 d electrons of iron ions and the inapplicability of the model of localized magnetic moments to the system.
In the series Fe 3 O 4 –Fe 3 S 4 –Fe 3 Se 4 , on the one hand, the presence of two non-equivalent positions of cations and ferrimagnetic properties are preserved, on the other hand, an increase in covalence enhances the metallic properties. Despite the structural similarity between greigite Fe 3 S 4 and magnetite Fe 3 O 4 , their magnetic properties [11] and magneto-optical spectra [12] differ significantly. The differences from magnetite become even greater for Fe 3 Se 4 , which has interesting magnetic and electrical properties [8,9,10]. Fe 3 Se 4 is a metallic ferrimagnetic material. Its electronic structure was calculated within the density functional theory (DFT) [13]. Tewari et al. [6] declare that the Fe 3 Se 4 material possess half-metallic properties. The spin-down band gap ( E g ) and half-metallic energy gap ( E H M ) calculated using the HSE06 hybrid functional [14] were found to be 1.8 eV and 0.17 eV, respectively. However, the analysis of experimental data reveled the extremely small E H M (1.3 meV and 34 meV, depending on the Se stoichiometry), thus the low energy is required to occupy minority spin states by the majority spin carriers during spin flip processes. The discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental E H M values can be associated with an increase in the localization of electronic states when a fraction of the Hartree–Fock exchange energy is included. This results in the inaccurate description of electronic structure near the Fermi level. It is known that the HSE06 functional can overestimate band gap [15,16]. Moreover, Gao et al. [17] suggest that hybrid functionals, such as HSE and PBE0 are not suitable for studying metal systems, and the LDA or GGA give better results in describing metallic properties.
Here we study the properties of Fe 3 Se 4 under high pressure within DFT. We calculated the changes of the magnetic moment on each sublattice with the increasing isotropic compression. The values of the magnetic moments decrease non-monotonically and eventually vanish for both inequivalent positions. Since Fe 3 Se 4 possess metallic properties, such a magnetic collapse cannot be represented as the energy-level crossing of the high-spin and the low-spin cation states. In this case, the magnetic collapse is caused by the alignment of the numbers of spin-up and spin-down electrons on each cation such that one can call this the itinerant analogue of the spin crossover. The spin crossover occurs faster under compression by isotropic pressure compared to when compression by isotropic strain.

2. Computational Details

Calculations of atomic and electronic structure and magnetic properties were performed in the framework of density functional theory using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [18]. Exchange-correlation effects were described by the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerh (PBE) of generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [19]. The ion-electron interactions were represented by the projector-augmented wave method (PAW) [20], and the plane-wave cutoff energy of 600 eV was applied. The criteria for the total energy minimization and interatomic forces were set to 10 4 eV and 10 2 eV/Å, respectively. The energy convergence criteria were decreased to 10 5 eV to obtain a more accurate electronic structure. The first Brillouin zone (1BZ) was sampled by 24 × 14 × 8 grid using the Monkhorst–Pack scheme [21]. The isotropic compressive strain was modelled as the change of the structural parameters. The value of strain is defined as ξ = ( l 0 l ) / l 0 , where l 0 and l are the equilibrium and strained lattice constant, respectively. The strain was uniform on three lattice directions, i.e., all lattice constants a, b, and c were changed at the same time by the same value of ξ . The strained lattice constants did not change during the geometry optimization. Compressive strain ranging from 0 to 14% is considered. The lattice shape remains unchanged during the compression. Compression by an isotropic pressure was studied by adding the external pressure to the diagonals of stress tensors. The value of the external pressure was changed from zero up to 8 GPa. Lattice constants, cell shape, cell volume, and ionic positions were optimized for these structures. The Visualization for Electronic and Structural Analysis (VESTA) [22] software was used for representation of atomic structures. The “vaspkit” software [23] was used for post-processing.

3. Results and Discussion

The crystal structure of the bulk Fe 3 Se 4 is shown in Figure 1a. The unit cell relates to the I 2 / m space group with the structural parameters a = 6.071 Å, b = 3.377 Å, c = 11.174 Å, and β = 92 . 818 , which are well in agreement with previously reported experimental data [6,9,10], see Table 1 for comparison. The unit cell contains six Fe atoms and eight Se atoms, with iron atoms occupying two non-equivalent positions, namely, octahedral (Fe 2 ) and distorted-octahedral (Fe 1 ) sites. The Se−Fe 2 Se angles for distorted-octahedral sites are equal to 104.0 , 89.8 , 89.9 and 75.5 . The bond lengths between Fe 2 and surrounding Se ions are 2.468 Å and 2.413 Å (bonds 1 and 2 in Figure 1a, respectively) and Fe 1 –Se bond lengths are 2.390 Å, 2.374 Å, 2.545 Å, and 2.581 Å (bond 3, 4, 5, and 6 in Figure 1a, respectively), see Table 2. The distances between Se atoms closest to the iron vacancy are 2.996 Å and 5.277 Å. The magnetic structure was found to be ferrimagnetic. The coupling between spins in Fe 3 Se 4 is accomplished by the mechanism of “through-bond spin polarization” that is a specific realization of the superexchange cation–anion–cation interaction, i.e., an iron atom with spin-up (spin-down) density induces spin-down (spin-up) density on the p-orbital of the adjacent Se atom directly bonded to it. Thus an iron atom is bonded to a selenium atom through the p-orbital with the direction of the electron spin opposite to its spin density. The distribution of the magnetisation density is shown in Figure 1b. The calculated magnetic moments on iron in sites 1 and 2 are 2.071 μ B and 2.042 μ B , respectively. The magnetic moments on Se atoms are very small and equal to 0.018 μ B and 0.015 μ B . The total magnetic moment of Fe 3 Se 4 is 2.135 μ B /f.u., i.e., in the range of the previously DFT-calculated values [6,13,24] but larger than the known experimental values [6,7,8], see Table 1. The discrepancy in magnetic moment between experimental and DFT-predicted values relates to the delocalization of 3 d electrons of Fe ions. Our calculations showed that the electronic structure of Fe 3 Se 4 is metallic, see Figure 2a,b, as in [13,25], and half-metallic state was not found. The density of states (DOS) at the Fermi level are predominantly formed by iron states. The bulk modulus of Fe 3 Se 4 is determined by performing six finite distortions of the lattice with ± 0.5 , ± 1.0 , ± 1.5 % magnitude. The calculated P V data are fitted to the Birch–Murnaghan equation of state P = 3 / 2 B 0 u 7 3 u 5 3 · 1 3 / 4 ( 4 B ) ( u 2 3 1 ) , where B 0 , u = V V 0 , V 0 , V, and B are the bulk module, the dimensionless volume, the reference volume (the initial volume of Fe 3 Se 4 ), the deformed volume, and the derivative of the bulk modulus with respect to pressure, respectively. Bulk modulus as a function of volume is shown at Figure 3. The obtained value of B 0 is 68 GPa, which is very similar to that of Fe 3 S 4 (62.8 GPa) [26] and is in the range of values for isomorphic Cr 3 Se 4 (57.7 GPa) and Cr 3 S 4 (72.9 GPa) [27] structures. Its pressure derivative was found to be six.
Next we study the effect of strain on the magnetic and electronic properties of Fe 3 Se 4 . First approach is to model the isotropic compressive strain via the change of the structural parameters. The lattice of Fe 3 Se 4 remains monoclinic and the angles between vectors remain unchanged during compression. Isotropic compression along the lattice constant up to 4% reduces the total magnetic moment of the system to 0.157 μ B /f.u., see Figure 4a and Table 3, which is caused by a decrease in bond lengths, see Table 2. The reduction in bond lengths makes the covalent character greater than the ionic character, which causes a decrease in the spin polarization of atoms. Further compression to 5% increases the magnetic moment by 0.904 μ B /f.u. In this compression range, the bond lengths with iron atoms located in the vacant layer (Fe 2 Se) decrease faster (by near 1.5%) than Fe 1 Se bond lengths (by 0.44, 0.34, 0.66, 0.70%). This leads to the fact that the magnetic moment on the Fe 2 atoms drastically decreases by 65.4% upon compression from 4 to 5%. At the same time, the magnetic moment on Fe 1 atoms increases from 0.602 to 0.764 μ B . A significant decrease in the magnetization on Fe 2 , opposite in direction to the magnetization of Fe 1 , leads to an increase in the total magnetic moment in the system. With further compression, the change in the Fe 2 Se bond lengths slows down and the change in Fe 1 Se bond lengths increases, causing the magnetic moment to decrease to 0.124 μ B /f.u. (6.5% compression).
Compression to 7% leads to a sharp jump in the magnetic moment up to 1.626 μ B and the magnetic order changes from ferrimagnetic to ferromagnetic. The magnetic moments on Fe 1 and Fe 2 ions are 2.071 μ B and 2.042 μ B , respectively. The magnetic moments on Se atoms are practically absent and equal to 0.006 μ B . The bond lengths of Fe 3 Se 4 under 7% strain is unevenly decreased by 2.26–8.87%. The distances between selenium atoms located near the iron vacancy are reduced by 7.4 and 11.7% compared to the initial distance, and equal to 4.888 Å and 2.645 Å, Table 2. The magnetic moment decreases linearly with the further compression from 7% to 13% and vanishes under 14% of compression. The pressure corresponding to this strain is equal to 114 GPa and the volume of the cell is 145.55 Å 3 . In this structure Fe–Se bond lengths are 7.79–15.96% shorter compared to the bond lengths in the original structure. The distances between selenium atoms near the vacancy decrease by 15.6 and 23.5% and are equal to 4.455 Å and 2.292 Å. Octahedrons formed by Fe 2 -Se bonds are disodered, so that Se−Fe 2 Se angles are equal to 85 and 95 . Selenium atoms located at opposite corners of the octahedron are still in the same plane (Se−Fe 2 Se angles are 180 ). The Se−Fe 2 Se angles are equal to 108.3 , 89.5 , 86.6 , and 74.7 . Values of the iron magnetic moments on sites 1 and 2 are shown in Table 3.
The electronic structure of Fe 3 Se 4 remains metallic throughout the studied compression range. The DOS at the Fermi level N ( E F ) as a function of strain is presented at Figure 4b. Slight compression up to 3.5% leads to an increase in the density of states at the Fermi level. Further, the N ( E F ) non-monotonically depends on the strain and correlates with the non-monotonic dependance of the total magnetic moment. An increase and decrease in the total magnetic moment is accompanied by an increase and decrease in the N ( E F ) . The decrease in the magnetic moment during compression from 8 to 14% is accompanied by an increase in the N ( E F ) . Figure 5 shows DOS of Fe 3 Se 4 at critical points. The redistribution of DOSs are observed, compared with the DOS of the original structure (Figure 2b). Compression up to 7% results in N ( E F ) decreasing, and the vacant states shifting by 0.6 eV to higher energies. The density of states with spin-up and spin-down is equalized on each Fe cation in the structure at a deformation of 14% (Figure 5b), which leads to the disappearance of the magnetic order. It is the itinerant analogue of the spin crossover in the metallic system. The metallic system of itinerant electrons lacks for the long-range magnetic order thus ending in the Pauli paramagnetic state. In this case, the DOS at the Fermi level is increased. The occupied states decrease significantly at 0.25 eV and increase at lower energies. The vacant states decrease at 0.19 eV and increase at higher energies.
The energy difference Δ E per formula unit between compressed and original Fe 3 Se 4 was calculated as Δ E = E c o m p r e s s e d E o r i g i n a l . Here E c o m p r e s s e d and E o r i g i n a l are the total energy of the Fe 3 Se 4 cell under isotropic compression and the total energy of the non-compressed Fe 3 Se 4 cell, respectively. The dependence of Δ E on compressive strain is shown in Figure 6. The increase in the energy is described by the cubic polynomial f = 0.0032 x 3 0.0048 x 2 + 0.0759 x 0.0241 . The structure at critical points of 7 and 14% is higher in energy by 1.38 and 8.86 eV/f.u., respectively.
Second approach to studying the effect of compression of Fe 3 Se 4 cells is to apply the isotropic pressure by adding the external pressure to the diagonals of the stress tensors. The results of calculations show that the cell shape of Fe 3 Se 4 does not change over the entire interval of the external pressure. Lattice constants vary nonuniformly because the cell is anisotropic, see Table 4. The lattice constant c decreases faster than a and b due to the presence of vacant layers. As a result the Fe 2 –Se bonds and the magnetic moments on Fe 2 atoms decrease rapidly, see Table 5 and Table 6. This difference is not so significant when the cell is compressed by small pressure. The c constant changes by more than 7% at an external pressure of more than 4.8 GPa. At the same time, the b constant is slightly increased compared to the original structure. In this case, the magnetic moments on iron in both sublattices are co-directed and oppositely directed to the magnetic moments on the Se ions, which are equal to 0.025 μ B and 0.003 μ B . This ferrimagnetic ordering is accomplished by the through-bond spin polarization. Iron atoms with a spin-up density induce a spin-down density on the adjacent Se atoms. This leads to an increase in the magnetic moment by 0.608 μ B . An increase in pressure up to 5.0 GPa leads to the disappearance of magnetic moments on Se atoms and the magnetic order of Fe 3 Se 4 becomes ferromagnetic. Then, the total magnetic moment decreases with increasing external pressure that is associated with a further decrease in bond lengths, see Table 5. At a pressure of 5.0 GPa, the value of the magnetic moment sharply decreased from 2.617 μ B to 0.146 μ B since the Fe 1 –Se bond lengths starts to decrease faster than previously. The magnetic order disappears and the magnetic moment becomes zero at a pressure of 8.0 GPa. The Fe–Se bond lengths are 2.02–7.59% shorter compared to those in the original structure. The distances between selenium atoms near the vacancy decrease by 8.9 and 6.0%. Se–Fe 1 –Se angles are equal to 97 . 7 , 91 . 2 , 93 . 5 , and 76 . 8 . Se–Fe 2 –Se angles are 86 . 7 and 93 . 3 . Selenium atoms located at opposite corners of this octahedron remain in the same plane. The volume of the cell is 201.61 Å 3 . Thus, the spin crossover in the monoclinic phase of Fe 3 Se 4 occurs faster under compression by the isotropic pressure compared to by the isotropic strain. The dependence of the total magnetic moment under compression by an external pressure is shown in Figure 7a.
DOS at the Fermi level N ( E F ) correlates with the non-monotonic dependance of the total magnetic moment, see Figure 7b. A decrease in the total magnetic moment is accompanied by an increase in the N ( E F ) . A change in the magnetic order from ferrimagnetic to ferromagnetic leads to a decrease in N ( E F ) that was also observed in the structure under compression by the isotropic strain. The electronic structure of Fe 3 Se 4 remains metallic at all values of external pressure. DOS with spin-up and spin-down become equal on each Fe cation under 8.0 GPa (Figure 8), resulting in a paramagnetic state. DOS in the vicinity of the Fermi level are increased compared to the DOS of the original structure shown in Figure 2b. DOS redistribution in this case differs from that for the paramagnetic Fe 3 Se 4 structure at 14% compressive strain, since the structural parameters change differently.
The energy difference Δ E between compressed and uncompressed Fe 3 Se 4 changes faster with the increasing external pressure than with the increasing strain, compare Figure 6 and Figure 9. Under the external pressure, the increase in energy is described by the linear dependence f = 1.3141 x + 0.1717 . Energy of Fe 3 Se 4 at critical points of 5.0 GPa and 8.0 GPa is higher by 7.10 and 10.55 eV/f.u., respectively. Thus, the ferromagnetic structure obtained under the isotropic strain compression is more stable than the one under the isotropic external pressure by 5.72 eV/f.u. The energy difference of the paramagnetic states in two regimes is not so significant and equals to 1.69 eV/f.u.

4. Conclusions

DFT calculations within GGA for Fe 3 Se 4 show that the ground state is metallic and the system is not in the half-metal state. That agrees with the conclusions of [13,25]. The value of the bulk modulus was found to be 68 GPa. By studying the compression effect on Fe 3 Se 4 within DFT, we found the itinerant analogue of the spin crossover in the metallic system. In particular, we calculated the magnetic moment in each of two iron sublattices of Fe 3 Se 4 in two regimes: (a) assuming an increasing isotropic compression by the compressive strain and (b) the isotropic external pressure. For crystals with such an anisotropic chemical bonding as in Fe 3 Se 4 , the regime (b) is more relevant to the experiments where the isotropic external pressure is applied. If the deformation of the crystal were isotropic as in the regime (a), the values of the moments would vanish for both inequivalent positions at the 14% of strain that corresponds to the pressure of 114 GPa. On the other hand, in the regime (b) under the isotropic external pressure, the magnetic collapse is expected to occur at a much smaller value of pressure, namely, at 8 GPa. Under the compression, the system evolves from the uncompressed ferrimagnetic state first to the ferromagnetic state and then to the paramagnetic state; the process is sketched in Figure 10.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.O.; calculations, L.V.B.; formal analysis, M.M.K.; writing, L.V.B., S.G.O. and M.M.K.; funding acquisition, S.G.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

L.V.B. and S.G.O. acknowledge the support of the Russian Science Foundation (Project 18-12-00022Π).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the useful discussions with M.A. Vysotin. L.V.B. would like to thank the Information Technology Center, Novosibirsk State University, for providing access to their supercomputer facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lyubutin, I.S.; Gavriliuk, A.G. High and Ultra-High Pressure Research on Phase Transformations in 3d-Metal Oxides: Current Progress. Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk 2009, 179, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gavriliuk, A.G.; Trojan, I.A.; Lyubutin, I.S.; Ovchinnikov, S.G.; Sarkissian, V.A. High-Pressure Magnetic Properties and P-T Phase Diagram of Iron Borate. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2005, 100, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mao, H.-K.; Takahashi, T.; Bassett, W.A.; Kinsland, G.L.; Merrill, L. Isothermal Compression of Magnetite to 320 KB and Pressure-Induced Phase Transformation. J. Geophys. Res. 1974, 79, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pasternak, M.P.; Nasu, S.; Wada, K.; Endo, S. High-Pressure Phase of Magnetite. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 6446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Okazaki, A.; Hirakawa, K. Structural Study of Iron Selenides FeSex. I Ordered Arrangment of Defects of Fe Atoms. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 1956, 11, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tewari, G.C.; Srivastava, D.; Pohjonen, R.; Mustonen, O.; Karttunen, A.J.; Linden, J.; Karppinen, M. Fe3Se4: A Possible Ferrimagnetic Half-Metal? J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2020, 32, 455801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lambert-Andron, B.; Berodias, G. Etude Par Diffraction Neutronique de Fe3Se4. Solid State Commun. 1969, 7, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Adachi, K. Magnetic Anisotropy Energy in Nickel Arsenide Type Crystals. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1961, 16, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pohjonen, R.; Mustonen, O.; Karppinen, M.; Lindén, J. Mössbauer Study of Magnetism in Fe3Se4. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 746, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Andresen, A.F. A Neutron Diffraction Investigation of Fe3Se4. Asta Chem. Scand. 1968, 22, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chang, L.; Roberts, A.P.; Tang, Y.; Rainford, B.D.; Muxworthy, A.R.; Chen, Q. Fundamental Magnetic Parameters from Pure Synthetic Greigite (Fe3S4). J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113, B06104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lyubutin, I.S.; Starchikov, S.S.; Lin, C.R.; Lu, S.Z.; Shaikh, M.O.; Funtov, K.O.; Dmitrieva, T.V.; Ovchinnikov, S.G.; Edelman, I.S.; Ivantsov, R. Magnetic, Structural, and Electronic Properties of Iron Sulfide Fe3S4 Nanoparticles Synthesized by the Polyol Mediated Process. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Singh, D.; Gupta, S.K.; He, H.; Sonvane, Y. First-Principles Study of the Electronic, Magnetic and Optical Properties of Fe3Se4 in Its Monoclinic Phase. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 498, 166157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krukau, A.V.; Vydrov, O.A.; Izmaylov, A.F.; Scuseria, G.E. Influence of the Exchange Screening Parameter on the Performance of Screened Hybrid Functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 224106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meng, Y.; Liu, X.W.; Huo, C.F.; Guo, W.P.; Cao, D.B.; Peng, Q.; Dearden, A.; Gonze, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. When Density Functional Approximations Meet Iron Oxides. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Noh, J.; Osman, O.I.; Aziz, S.G.; Winget, P.; Brédas, J.L. A Density Functional Theory Investigation of the Electronic Structure and Spin Moments of Magnetite. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2014, 15, 044202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gao, W.; Abtew, T.A.; Cai, T.; Sun, Y.Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, P. On the Applicability of Hybrid Functionals for Predicting Fundamental Properties of Metals. Solid State Commun. 2016, 234–235, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Blöchl, P.E. Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, V.; Xu, N.; Liu, J.C.; Tang, G.; Geng, W.T. VASPKIT: A User-Friendly Interface Facilitating High-Throughput Computing and Analysis Using VASP Code. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2021, 267, 108033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Long, G.; Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Sabirianov, R.; Zhang, Z.; Zeng, H. Magnetic Anisotropy and Coercivity of Fe3Se4 Nanostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 202103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Persson, K. Materials Data on Fe3Se4 (SG:12) by Materials Project. 2016. Available online: https://materialsproject.org/materials/mp-569176/ (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  26. Roldan, A.; Santos-Carballal, D.; de Leeuw, N.H. A comparative DFT study of the mechanical and electronic properties of greigite Fe3S4 and magnetite Fe3O4. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 204712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, S.; Liu, B. Stable half-metallic ferromagnetism in nonstoichiometric cubic binary chromium chalcogenides. Europhys. Lett. 2009, 88, 67007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Atomic structure (a) and the spin-resolved magnetization density (b) of Fe 3 Se 4 . The unit cell is marked with black lines. Brown and yellow-green colors correspond to Fe and Se atoms, respectively. In panel (b), yellow (blue) areas indicate the spin-up (spin-down) density. Isosurface value is 0.002 a 0 3 ,where a 0 is the Bohr radius.
Figure 1. Atomic structure (a) and the spin-resolved magnetization density (b) of Fe 3 Se 4 . The unit cell is marked with black lines. Brown and yellow-green colors correspond to Fe and Se atoms, respectively. In panel (b), yellow (blue) areas indicate the spin-up (spin-down) density. Isosurface value is 0.002 a 0 3 ,where a 0 is the Bohr radius.
Materials 15 04583 g001
Figure 2. Density of states (a, b) of Fe 3 Se 4 . Total DOS of Fe 3 Se 4 is shown by black curves. In panel (a), partial DOS of Fe and Se atoms are shown by green and red curves, respectively. In panel (b), partial DOS of iron atoms on site 1 and on site 2 are shown by green and red curves, respectively. Positive and negative values of DOS corresponds to spin-up and spin-down channels, respectively. The Fermi level corresponds to zero.
Figure 2. Density of states (a, b) of Fe 3 Se 4 . Total DOS of Fe 3 Se 4 is shown by black curves. In panel (a), partial DOS of Fe and Se atoms are shown by green and red curves, respectively. In panel (b), partial DOS of iron atoms on site 1 and on site 2 are shown by green and red curves, respectively. Positive and negative values of DOS corresponds to spin-up and spin-down channels, respectively. The Fermi level corresponds to zero.
Materials 15 04583 g002
Figure 3. Pressure as a function of Fe 3 Se 4 volume. Blue dots indicate values for structures with finite strains ± 0.5 , ± 1.0 , ± 1.5 %. The curve through this values fitted to the Birch–Murnaghan equation is marked by red.
Figure 3. Pressure as a function of Fe 3 Se 4 volume. Blue dots indicate values for structures with finite strains ± 0.5 , ± 1.0 , ± 1.5 %. The curve through this values fitted to the Birch–Murnaghan equation is marked by red.
Materials 15 04583 g003
Figure 4. The dependence of the total magnetic moment (a) and DOS at the Fermi level (b) on isotropic compression.
Figure 4. The dependence of the total magnetic moment (a) and DOS at the Fermi level (b) on isotropic compression.
Materials 15 04583 g004
Figure 5. Total (TDOS) and partial (PDOS) densities of states for Fe 3 Se 4 under 7% (a) and 14% (b) compression. Positive and negative values corresponds to spin-up and spin-down channels, respectively. The Fermi level corresponds to zero.
Figure 5. Total (TDOS) and partial (PDOS) densities of states for Fe 3 Se 4 under 7% (a) and 14% (b) compression. Positive and negative values corresponds to spin-up and spin-down channels, respectively. The Fermi level corresponds to zero.
Materials 15 04583 g005
Figure 6. Energetic stability of the compressed Fe 3 Se 4 structure relative to the original structure, Δ E in eV per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit.
Figure 6. Energetic stability of the compressed Fe 3 Se 4 structure relative to the original structure, Δ E in eV per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit.
Materials 15 04583 g006
Figure 7. The dependence of the total magnetic moment (a) and DOS at the Fermi level (b) on external pressure.
Figure 7. The dependence of the total magnetic moment (a) and DOS at the Fermi level (b) on external pressure.
Materials 15 04583 g007
Figure 8. Total and partial DOS for Fe 3 Se 4 under isotropic external pressure of 8.0 GPa. Positive and negative values correspond to spin-up and spin-down channels, respectively. The Fermi level corresponds to zero.
Figure 8. Total and partial DOS for Fe 3 Se 4 under isotropic external pressure of 8.0 GPa. Positive and negative values correspond to spin-up and spin-down channels, respectively. The Fermi level corresponds to zero.
Materials 15 04583 g008
Figure 9. Energetic stability of the Fe 3 Se 4 compressed by the external pressure relative to the uncompressed structure, Δ E in eV per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit.
Figure 9. Energetic stability of the Fe 3 Se 4 compressed by the external pressure relative to the uncompressed structure, Δ E in eV per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit.
Materials 15 04583 g009
Figure 10. Illustration of the Fe 3 Se 4 transformation under the applied isotropic strain ξ or the isotropic external pressure P e x between the ferrimagnetic and the paramagnetic states through the ferromagnetic state. Brown and yellow-green colors correspond to Fe and Se atoms, respectively. The arrows indicate the direction of magnetic moments on iron atoms.
Figure 10. Illustration of the Fe 3 Se 4 transformation under the applied isotropic strain ξ or the isotropic external pressure P e x between the ferrimagnetic and the paramagnetic states through the ferromagnetic state. Brown and yellow-green colors correspond to Fe and Se atoms, respectively. The arrows indicate the direction of magnetic moments on iron atoms.
Materials 15 04583 g010
Table 1. Structural and magnetic parameters of monoclinic phase of Fe3Se4.
Table 1. Structural and magnetic parameters of monoclinic phase of Fe3Se4.
Structural ParametersMagnetic
Moment
( μ B /f.u.)
Ref.
Lattice Constant (Å)Angle (°)
abc β
6.2023.53211.33191.825°-[9]
6.1133.48611.13991.66°-[10]
6.163.5311.1092.0°-[5]
----1.17[6]
----0.9[7]
----0.69[8]
6.0713.37711.17492.818°2.128This work
Table 2. Bond lengths (Å) and distance (Å) between Se atoms closest to the iron vacancy of the FeFe3Se4 monoclinic phase. The atomic numbering scheme is shown in Figure 1a.
Table 2. Bond lengths (Å) and distance (Å) between Se atoms closest to the iron vacancy of the FeFe3Se4 monoclinic phase. The atomic numbering scheme is shown in Figure 1a.
Strain (%)Bond or Distance (Å)
12345678
02.4682.4132.3902.3742.5452.5812.9965.277
22.4192.3642.3492.3552.5032.5162.8955.151
32.3962.3422.3252.3442.4802.4812.8495.091
3.52.3842.3332.3122.3382.4672.4652.8285.066
42.3812.3352.2912.3242.4402.4462.8255.068
4.52.3702.3192.2832.3232.4262.4282.7965.044
52.3462.3012.2812.3162.4242.4292.7564.994
5.52.3382.2802.2682.3302.4162.3932.7294.967
62.3252.2762.2642.3052.3972.4002.7004.943
6.52.3142.2622.2532.3032.3872.3822.6714.916
72.3062.2452.2392.3112.3792.3522.6454.888
82.2822.2202.2202.2982.3582.3272.5884.829
92.2582.1962.2022.2832.3372.3012.5354.767
102.2352.1722.1832.2662.3152.2742.4834.705
112.2122.1472.1642.2502.2942.2482.4324.644
122.1892.1232.1452.2312.2722.2222.3854.582
132.1662.1002.1272.2112.2502.1952.3374.519
142.1432.0782.1092.1892.2772.1692.2924.455
Table 3. Magnetic moments (in μ B ) of iron atoms on two sites, Fe 1 and Fe 2 , and total magnetic moments per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit of Fe 3 Se 4 under compression. The Wigner–Seitz radius for Fe ions is 1.302 Å.
Table 3. Magnetic moments (in μ B ) of iron atoms on two sites, Fe 1 and Fe 2 , and total magnetic moments per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit of Fe 3 Se 4 under compression. The Wigner–Seitz radius for Fe ions is 1.302 Å.
Strain (%)Fe 1 MomentFe 2 MomentTotal Moment
02.071−2.0422.135
21.778−1.6311.969
31.556−1.4171.759
3.51.387−1.3181.460
40.602−1.3340.157
4.50.282−1.2140.692
50.764−0.4621.061
5.50.493−0.2970.673
60.266−0.2090.368
6.50.053−0.0410.075
70.4630.6661.626
80.3520.5401.286
90.2820.4251.038
100.2250.3280.823
110.1620.2300.585
120.0680.0940.243
130.0040.0050.009
140.0000.0000.000
Table 4. Lattice constants (Å) of Fe 3 Se 4 under isotropic external pressure (GPa).
Table 4. Lattice constants (Å) of Fe 3 Se 4 under isotropic external pressure (GPa).
Lattice ConstantExternal Pressure (GPa)
2.03.04.54.85.07.58.0
a (Å)6.0165.9935.9625.8835.8925.8575.850
b (Å)3.3413.3273.3113.4233.4773.4603.455
c (Å)11.06511.01410.92910.38210.04810.0029.987
Table 5. Bond lengths (Å) and distance (Å) between Se atoms closest to the iron vacancy of the Fe 3 Se 4 under isotropic external pressure. The atomic numbering scheme is shown in Figure 1a.
Table 5. Bond lengths (Å) and distance (Å) between Se atoms closest to the iron vacancy of the Fe 3 Se 4 under isotropic external pressure. The atomic numbering scheme is shown in Figure 1a.
Pressure (GPa)Bond or Distance (Å)
2.02.4402.3912.3712.3642.5292.5432.9365.232
3.02.4292.3822.3632.3602.5212.5282.9125.214
4.52.4142.3692.3502.3532.5112.5052.8785.184
4.82.3802.3392.3102.3372.4992.4322.7955.071
5.02.3772.3452.3072.3332.4572.4032.7724.993
7.52.3662.3322.2962.4502.3882.7362.9684.968
8.02.3622.3292.2932.3262.4472.3852.7304.959
Table 6. Magnetic moments (in μ B ) of iron atoms on two sites, Fe 1 and Fe 2 , and total magnetic moments per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit of Fe 3 Se 4 under external pressure. The Wigner–Seitz radius for Fe ions is 1.302 Å.
Table 6. Magnetic moments (in μ B ) of iron atoms on two sites, Fe 1 and Fe 2 , and total magnetic moments per Fe 3 Se 4 formula unit of Fe 3 Se 4 under external pressure. The Wigner–Seitz radius for Fe ions is 1.302 Å.
Pressure (GPa)Fe 1 MomentFe 2 MomentTotal Moment
2.01.942−1.8292.097
3.01.884−1.7382.068
4.51.786−1.5962.009
4.81.0650.5442.617
5.00.0770.0050.146
7.50.0130.0010.017
8.00.0000.0000.000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Begunovich, L.V.; Korshunov, M.M.; Ovchinnikov, S.G. Magnetic Collapse in Fe3Se4 under High Pressure. Materials 2022, 15, 4583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134583

AMA Style

Begunovich LV, Korshunov MM, Ovchinnikov SG. Magnetic Collapse in Fe3Se4 under High Pressure. Materials. 2022; 15(13):4583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134583

Chicago/Turabian Style

Begunovich, Lyudmila V., Maxim M. Korshunov, and Sergey G. Ovchinnikov. 2022. "Magnetic Collapse in Fe3Se4 under High Pressure" Materials 15, no. 13: 4583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134583

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop