Next Article in Journal
Pressure-Dependent Structure of BaZrO3 Crystals as Determined by Raman Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Demonstration of Use of a Novel 3D Printed Simulator for Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

XPS Study in BiFeO3 Surface Modified by Argon Etching

by
Grecia Alejandra Gomez-Iriarte
1,*,†,
Arbelio Pentón-Madrigal
2,
Luiz Augusto Sousa de Oliveira
3,† and
João Paulo Sinnecker
1,*,†
1
Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Xavier Sigaud 150, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, RJ, Brazil
2
Facultad de Física, Universidad de La Habana, La Habana CP10400, Cuba
3
Núcleo Multidisciplinar de Pesquisas em Nanotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia Washington Luiz, km 104, 5, Duque de Caxias 25240-005, RJ, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2022, 15(12), 4285; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124285
Submission received: 7 April 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 17 June 2022

Abstract

:
This paper reports an XPS surface study of pure phase BiFeO 3 thin film produced and later etched by pure argon ions. Analysis of high-resolution spectra from Fe 2 p , Bi 4 f and 5 d , O 1 s , and the valence band, exhibited mainly Fe 3 + and Bi 3 + components, but also reveal Fe 2 + . High-energy argon etching induces the growth of Fe ( 0 ) and Bi ( 0 ) and an increment of Fe 2 + , as expected. The BiFeO 3 semiconductor character is preserved despite the oxygen loss, an interesting aspect for the study of the photovoltaic effect through oxygen vacancies in some ceramic films. The metal-oxygen bonds in O 1 s spectra are related only to one binding energy contrary to the split from bismuth and iron reported in other works. All these data evidence that the low-pressure argon atmosphere is proved to be efficient to produce pure phase BiFeO 3 , even after argon etching.

1. Introduction

Multiferroics are multifunctional materials that combine two or more ferroic properties, whether electrical, magnetic or crystal deformation [1]. However, it is not usual to find these multiferroic materials in nature due to the intrinsic mechanisms that lead to ferroic properties; most ferromagnetic materials exhibit partial filled 3 d levels, whereas ferroelectric materials show empty 3 d levels (mainly in perovskites) [2]. Even though some multiferroics present mechanisms for getting ferroic properties combined [2,3], only a few show these properties at room temperature in the pure phase, the desired aspect for technological applications. Examples are the piezoelectric material lead zirconate titanate (PbZr x Ti 1 x O 3 or PZT) [4] and, bismuth ferrite (BiFeO 3 or BFO). BiFeO 3 is a multiferroic material that exhibits at room temperature ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic properties, with T C ∼810–830 C and T N ∼370 C respectively [5]. Magnetism comes from iron metal transition and electrical polarization comes from displacement of lone pair Bi 6 s [2,3].
Despite these appealing properties, the pure phase BFO is difficult to synthesize thanks to its high sensitivity to manufacturing conditions due to its narrow phase diagram, which increases the probability of achieving it with other recurring phases like Bi 25 FeO 39 and Bi 2 Fe 4 O 9 [5,6,7].
In BFO film production, using an oxygen atmosphere during deposition and further annealing is expected to avoid oxygen vacancies [8] that could generate leakage currents [9]. However, since oxygen is a reactive element, higher partial pressure of this element could increase the presence of spurious unwanted phases [10]. One way to reduce the presence of these phases during the BFO film preparation consists of using a mixed atmosphere of O 2 with an inert gas such as argon or nitrogen [11]. One can obtain pure phase BFO thin films over Si (100) by sputtering in an argon atmosphere at low pressure [12]. One way to study the thin film’s surface properties is through X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). This technique permits the investigation of chemical states based on binding energies (BE) from core level electrons according to atomic bonds in the material.
This work reports on the XPS study of BiFeO 3 thin film deposited at a low-pressure argon atmosphere and further etching by Ar + ions inside the XPS chamber for different times. The etching process allowed us to perform a detailed examination of oxygen vacancies through the core levels analysis of Fe 2 p , Bi 4 f , O 1 s , and the semi-core Bi 5 d and not only of O 1 s , as conventionally reported. As expected, the XPS analysis presented that Argon ions reduced Fe and Bi, showing additional oxidation states (Fe 2 + and Fe ( 0 ) ) and (B ( 0 ) ), respectively. Although the film deposition in a pure argon atmosphere produces oxygen loss, bringing a nonstoichiometry BFO film, the reduction of valence band maxima (VBM) preserved the BFO semiconductor character, with an absence of Fermi level overlap between the valence and conduction band. This behaviour is interesting for oxygen vacancies controlled photovoltaic effect in some ceramic films.

2. Experimental

BiFeO 3 thin film was deposited over Si (100) substrate by 35 watts of RF magnetron sputtering, using a commercial BFO target (AJA International, Inc., Scituate, MA, USA). A low-pressure argon atmosphere (work pressure of 3 mTorr) was used to minimize chemical changes and reduce the presence of BFO spurious phases. The substrate deposition temperature was kept at 873 K, with further in-situ annealing at 973 K for 60 min after the film deposition [12]. In grazing incidence mode, the thin-film crystalline structure was studied by high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HR-XRD) performed in the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS), with 1.3776 Å wavelength.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was made using a SPECS PHOIBOS 100/150 spectrometer with a polychromatic Al K α line (1486.6 eV) with a quartz crystal monochromator. The binding energy scan was at 0.05 eV energy step for high-resolution spectra and 0.5 eV for survey spectra. Quantitative analysis was elaborated using CasaXPS processing software, considering a Shirley background, a Voigt line shape (LA) that better fits each peak, and the instrumental resolution of 0.7 eV measured from FWHM of Au 4 f 7 / 2 peak. The binding energies (BE) were corrected through oxygen core level O 1 s (529.6 eV) [13,14]; a previous test correction was made using Bi 4 f 7 / 2 (158.7 eV), with no noticeably changes concerning O 1 s calibration confirming the acceptable oxygen core level correction. For etching depth profiling, argon ions (Ar + ) were used at times stages of 40, 80, 200, 600, 2680, and 4480 s. For the sake of clarity, only the 0, 80, and 2680 s spectra will be shown here (Supplementary Material is available with information about the other etching times). Ar + ions energies were 3 keV from 40 to 200 s, and 5 KeV from 600 to 4480 s. Ar + etching time at 0 s (spectrum named 0 s or unetched) corresponds to the sample just deposited in a low-pressure argon atmosphere by RF sputtering.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis

Figure 1 shows the experimental and refined XRD pattern of as-deposited BFO film, named 0 s. The XRD pattern exhibits a polycrystalline film, indexed by ICSD 188396, PDF version 2.4 (2003). The lattice parameters are a = b = 5.569 Å, and c = 13.751 Å, referring to R3c-H space group, which represents a rhombohedral structure projected in a hexagonal basis. High-resolution XRD reveals no trace of other phases such Bi 2 Fe 4 O 9 and Bi 25 Fe 2 O 39 , recurrent in BiFeO 3 syntheses [7,15]. The X-ray diffraction refinement, made by the Rietveld method and using Fullprof Suite software [16,17], has shown a selective peak shift for reflections of the type ( 0 k 2 k ) , k Z . Considering the described selective reflection shifts concerning theoretical Bragg positions, a proper phenomenological model was applied. These shiftings could probably be caused by Si substrate as a result of deposition without a buffer layer, an issue not observed in BFO film deposited over SrTiO 3 , often used for epitaxial growth.
The film thickness was 90 nm, determined by the X-ray reflectivity technique (XRR); and the calculated crystallite size was around 32 nm, a size below the length of a cycloidal spin structure (62 nm) present in BFO along (110) direction. The interruption of the cycloidal spin structure gives rise to a spin canting that is responsible for a net magnetization [12,18].

3.2. Quantitative Atomic Composition

Figure 2 shows survey spectra at 0 s (unetched) and 2680 s of the Ar + etching time, with binding energies (BE) ranging from 0 to 760 eV. Both spectra reveal the elements present in BiFeO 3 , further the adventitious carbon C 1 s at 0 s (typical in samples exposed to air). For samples etched at 80 s or more, slight argon implantation is observed, exhibited through Ar 2 s (319.9 eV), Ar 2 p 3 / 2 (242.4 eV) and Ar 2 p 1 / 2 (244.6 eV). As expected, those are more visible in the sample etched for 2680 s. Peaks marked with (#) and (*) correspond to Bi 5 p 1 / 2 (120.0 eV) and Fe 3 s (99.4 eV), respectively. The highest signal from Bi 4 f is due to its large cross-section. Eventually, with the etching time, Bi 4 f intensities decrease.
Figure 3 shows the C 1 s XPS spectra of the unetched sample and the samples etched at 40 and 80 s. The C 1 s peaks correspond to adventitious carbon (AdC), present on all surfaces with air exposure. At 0 s, peaks with a binding energy of 285 eV correspond to C-C bonds, 286.4 eV with C-O bonds, and 288.2 eV with O-C=O bonds. After 40 s, a reduced C-C peak remains, which shifts slightly to 284.7 eV, disappearing after 80 s of etching. The shift of the C-C peak at 40 s and its disappearance after 80 s etching time are why it is not convenient, in this work, to use the C 1 s for binding energy correction (charge calibration). Some previous results have already reported issues on the C 1s peak for binding energy correction as a not good reference for the calibration of XPS spectra [19,20,21].
Figure 4 shows high-resolution XPS spectra from core level O 1 s , according to etch time at (a) 0 s, (b) 80 s, and (c) 2680 s. Figure 4a shows the XPS spectrum for the unetched BFO film, with a peak at 529.6 eV, corresponding to metal-oxygen bonds (M-O x ), and a peak at 531.5 eV, corresponding to oxygen bonded with adventitious carbon (AdC) AdC-O [13], confirmed by the etching process as shown in Figure 4b. The AdC-O peak disappears after 80 s of argon etching, and the metal-oxygen peak preserves line shape, binding energies, and FWHM around 1 eV [22,23,24]. The same behaviour occurs even with the high etching (2680 s), as exhibited in Figure 4c, suggesting that in the pure phase BFO, Bi-O, and Fe-O bonds are related to one photoemission at 529.5 eV.
Some works report oxygen vacancies in XPS through O 1 s spectra with a peak around 531.4 eV related to either dangling bonds [25] or photoemissions from Fe-O short bonds in BFO [13] or Bi-O bonds. However, one has to be careful with this assertion. Samples with any exposure to air often present a peak between 531.4–532.0 eV associated with the AdC-O bond. That could also be associated with a shifting influenced by other atoms bonds, for BiFeO 3 dopped samples. In this work, the oxygen vacancies in the BFO thin film were studied from bismuth, Fe 2 p and valence band spectra. It is recommended to make an argon etching at low energy and with short time exposure in order to ensure a free surface of adventitious carbon to improve the O 1 s analysis.
Figure 5 exhibits Bi 5 d spectra for the unetched sample and for the 80 and 2680 s Ar + etched ones. Bi 5 d doublet, as consequence of spin orbit splitting, are exhibited being quantified considering peak areas ratio around 2:3, according to degeneracy ratio 2 j + 1 : 2 j + + 1 [26,27]. At 0 s, the Figure 5a shows the doublet peak with BE around 25.8 eV for Bi 3 + 5 d 5 / 2 , and 28.8 eV for Bi 3 + 5 d 3 / 2 , with energetic spin-orbit splitting Δ = 3 eV, being these values close to bismuth oxide (Bi 2 O 3 ) [28,29] and BFO [30].
With etching time, another less intense doublet peak sums to the already identified Bi 3 + doublet, the Figure 5b shows Bi ( 0 ) 5 d 5 / 2 and Bi ( 0 ) 5 d 3 / 2 from metallic bismuth Bi ( 0 ) with binding energies around 23.7 eV and 26.8 eV, and Δ = 3.1 eV [31]. The Bi ( 0 ) doublet peak concentration values increase considerably with etching time, with 8% of atomic concentration for 80 s and 35% for 2680 s (Figure 5c), indicating an increasing oxygen loss in the BFO surface. According to NIST XPS data base [32], O 2 s exhibits a wide range of binding energies between 16 and 32 eV due to O 2 s electrons frequently contributing to molecular orbitals [33]. In this work, the O 2 s peak from BFO has binding energy at 21.3 eV, a value close to photoelectrons coming from iron oxides such as magnetite and maghemite (21.5 eV) [34].
Figure 6 exhibits Bi 4 f spectra, being deconvoluted using constrictions in energetic spin-orbit splitting around Δ = 5.3 eV, and areas ratio 3:4 according to degeneracy proportion. Figure 6a exhibits Bi 4 f at 0 s, with doublets peak around 158.7 and 164.2 eV corresponding an oxidation state Bi 3 + . These values agree with other BFO works [13,35], and they are close to bismuth oxide Bi 2 O 3 [36,37]. A peak related to metallic bismuth does not appear (just like in Bi 5 d at 0 s) confirming that deposition in a low argon atmosphere is not enough to produce metallic species. Photoemissions coming from Bi 4 f at 0 s are higher compared with the other core levels, as the bismuth cross-section is larger than the ones of iron and oxygen and also as 4 f energy level takes in more electrons.
Metallic bismuth, Bi ( 0 ) , appears with argon etching time. At 80 s the spectrum shows a doublet metallic bismuth signature (Figure 6b) with BE at 156.8 eV for Bi ( 0 ) 4 f 7 / 2 and 162.1 eV for Bi ( 0 ) 4 f 5 / 2 , representing 6.2% photoemissions compared with Bi 3 + . After 2680 s of argon etching (Figure 6c), an enhancement in metallic Bi doublet peak intensity was observed corresponding to 33% of atomic concentration. This value agrees with the one exhibited by Bi 5 d spectra, showing the Bi-metallic increase in both core levels in a similar proportion.
Frequently the deconvolution of Fe 2 p XPS peaks is mostly complex due to core holes created by photoemissions can produce other couplings in the high-spin states of iron [26], in addition, bonds with other elements, showing frequently asymmetric peaks. For Fe 2 p analysis, many works contemplate two ways of XPS deconvolution: multiplet splitting and spin-orbit splitting, the latest a broader method.
Multiple splitting happens when a core electron interacts with an unpaired electron of the upper shell, considering features such as electrostatic interaction, spin-orbit interaction, and crystalline field [26,38,39]; XPS analysis by this procedure is more accurate but is necessary to know how crystalline field influences the transitions between energy states. The argon etching in XPS makes it difficult to know how much the crystalline field was modified in the sample, a reason to consider analysis from spin-orbit splitting in this work purely, stand out that the deconvolution model is based on the deposition in an argon atmosphere, the behaviour of all spectra, and considering satellites parameters related in some works [19,40].
Figure 7 shows the high resolution spectra from Fe 2 p core level for the unetched, 80 s and 2680 s etched samples. Doublet from spin-orbit splitting Fe 2 p 1 / 2 and Fe 2 p 3 / 2 were quantified using Δ = 13.5 eV, for iron oxidized states [41,42], Δ = 13.0 eV, for metallic iron Fe ( 0 ) , and areas ratio 1:2, according to degeneracy proportion [26,27]. There are shake-up satellite peaks for all etching times, representing 2 p photoelectron that excites a 3 d electron to 4 s level [39]. Figure 7a shows the Fe 2 p spectrum for the unetched BFO film. The iron has an oxidation state of Fe 3 + in BFO, but as a result of oxygen lost during film deposition, Fe 2 + emerges, representing with their satellites 17% of Fe 2 p photoemissions.
Dual oxidation states of Fe indicate the presence of oxygen vacancies in the film, setting up in the sample Fe 3 + -O-Fe 2 + hybridized states that stabilizes the charge imbalance in the system and magnetic double-exchange interaction appears [12,43]. The binding energies from Fe 3 + 2 p and Fe 2 + 2 p are summarized in the Table 1, showing Fe 2 + 2 p 3 / 2 and Fe 3 + 2 p 3 / 2 peaks with BE of 709.6 and 710.1 eV respectively, close to values reported for BFO [43] and other iron oxides [42,44]. Fe 2 p XPS from BFO has a visible shake-up satellites at 718.6 and 731.6 eV corresponding to Fe 3 + photoemissions [14], for Fe 2 + satellites the binding energies considered was of 713.9 eV and 727.8 eV close to the values reported from magnetite [40,42].
Figure 7b shows Fe 2 p XPS spectrum when argon etching time increases to 80 s; the presence of Fe 2 + increases to 23%, and metallic iron (Fe ( 0 ) ) is exhibited through the doublets with binding energies at 707.9 and 720.9 eV, representing an atomic concentration around 1.0%. After 2680 s of argon etching, Figure 7c, Fe 2 + increases to 28% and Fe ( 0 ) stays almost constant around 1.7%; the oxygen loss is shown here as in Bi 4 f and Bi 5 d spectra.
Atomic concentrations were obtained through CasaXPS software considering relative sensitive factor (RSF) values according to the core level. Figure 8 summarizes the atomic concentrations of species present in Fe 2 p and Bi 4 f core levels for all etching times. Fe 3 + and Bi 3 + decrease but still are the main oxidation states in BFO film. Metallic bismuth and Fe 2 + concentrations increase with etching time, and at 4480 s they constitute around 44% and 35% of photoemissions respectively. These different values are related to the higher cross-section from bismuth, giving rise to more photoelectrons. Metallic iron and metallic bismuth appear after 40 s of etching time, suggesting that deposition in an argon atmosphere at low pressure could not generate metallic species, but a nonstoichiometric film related to oxygen loss; as consequence, the magnetic behaviour comes from a combination of spin canting by grain size and double exchange interaction [12]. Metallic iron remains constant at around 1.5%, demonstrating that argon etching breaks Fe-O bonds mostly, producing more photoemissions coming from Fe 2 + as expected.
The valence band (VB) generally is not quantifiable due to states hybridized present in this region, being a low binding energy zone from the Fermi energy (E F = BE = 0 eV) to 15 eV [27].
Figure 9a exhibits the valence band behaviour after deposition in argon atmosphere (0 s) and with Ar + etching time inside XPS chamber at 80 s and 2680 s, exhibiting a valence band maximum (VBM). The VBM refers to the valence band edge, being the bandgap in semiconductors defined by the difference between this value and the conduction band minimum (CBM), in this work it is related to the BFO surface.
For the unetched sample, the valence band maximum (VBM) is at 1.42 eV, suggesting maintenance of the semiconductor character in BFO film [5,45], despite the oxygen vacancies generated during BFO deposition in an argon atmosphere. Thus, the BFO film presents a relative band gap reduction compared with VBM typical values between 2.2 eV and 2.6 eV, reported for BFO [46,47,48,49].
While etching time increases, the band gap decreases with a shifting VBM towards the Fermi level. Valence band tails, as a result of conductive states from metallic iron (Fe ( 0 ) ) and bismuth (Bi ( 0 ) ), appear at 40 s and overstep E F at 80 s, reaching up to −1 eV value at 2680 s. This behaviour is observed in BFO with α β and β γ transitions (rhombohedral to orthorhombic and orthorhombic to cubic phase transitions, respectively), where the semiconducting state goes to a conductive one [5]. Figure 9b shows how the VBM value changes with etching time, being more drastic at the first 80 s and changing more slowly at high etching time, still at 4480 s; the VBM is under the Fermi level. The semiconductor bandgap behaviour with argon etching depends on materials characteristics, like stoichiometry in doped materials [50] or nanostructure character [51,52]. In some semiconductor materials, oxygen vacancies reduce directly the band gap through a shifting of VBM value [50,53,54], aspect seen in this work, suggesting that oxygen vacancies could control the BFO’s semiconductor state, an interesting feature for studies of the photovoltaic effect in BFO.
Binding energies range between 1 and 9 eV, related to the valence band itself, exhibit photo-emissions of hybridized states from Fe 3 d , O 2 p , and Bi 6 p . A peak at 11.8 eV corresponds to lone pair Bi 6 s , being more noticeable in the spectra at 0 and 80 s [30]. All the region between 1 and 15 eV has similar behaviour to the density of states (DOS) calculated for BFO [30,55]. Even with high etching time, the main hybridized states are sufficiently preserved.

4. Conclusions

We report the XPS study of argon sputtering on pure phase BFO film surface through the Bi 4 f and 5 d , O 1 s , Fe 2 p components, and its valence band. The effects of a low-pressure argon atmosphere on BFO deposition and argon etching inside the XPS chamber at different times were also investigated. Contrary to the usual reported BFO deposition methods, using an oxygen-rich atmosphere, the low-pressure argon atmosphere is proved to be efficient to produce pure phase BFO, without other phases like Bi 2 Fe 4 O 9 and Bi 25 FeO 39 , and oxygen loss brings a nonstoichiometric film. Oxygen vacancies are revealed through the presence of Fe 2 + and a reduced valence band maximum, without traces of metallic species that could lead to misinterpretations about ferromagnetic behaviour in BFO films. Subsequent Ar + etching inside the XPS chamber increases Fe 2 + and promotes the appearance of metallic Fe and metallic Bi, as expected. The band gap reduction through the narrowing of valence band maxima shows that the pure BFO phase obtained still preserves the semiconductor character. This behaviour is interesting for oxygen vacancies controlled photovoltaic effect in some ceramic films.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15124285/s1. It displays the XPS spectra and peak parameter evolution with Ar + etching time from core levels C 1 s , O 1 s , Bi 5 d , Bi 4 f , Fe 2 p and the valence band.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A.G.-I., J.P.S.; methodology, G.A.G.-I., A.P.-M. and J.P.S.; validation, G.A.G.-I., A.P.-M., L.A.S.d.O. and J.P.S.; formal analysis, G.A.G.-I.; investigation, G.A.G.-I.; resources, J.P.S.; data curation, G.A.G.-I.; writing—original draft preparation, G.A.G.-I.; writing—review and editing G.A.G.-I., A.P.-M., L.A.S.d.O. and J.P.S.; supervision, L.A.S.d.O. and J.P.S.; project administration, J.P.S.; funding acquisition, J.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq under Grants No.312275/2018-8 and No.424022/2018-4, FAPERJ under Grant PENSARIO No. E-26/210.903/2014 and No. E-26/200.830/2021, and PROEX No. 23038.014115/2016-25 from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the use of LabSurf/CBPF for the sample preparation, XPS measurements made by J. Barreto and F. Stavale, and LNLS/CNPEM Campinas for the high-resolution X-rays under proposal 20160352.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BFOBismuth ferrite- BiFeO 3
VBValence band
VBMValence band maximum

References

  1. Eerenstein, W.; Mathur, N.; Scott, J.F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature 2006, 442, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fiebig, M.; Lottermoser, T.; Meier, D.; Trassin, M. The evolution of multiferroics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheong, S.W.; Mostovoy, M. Multiferroics: A magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mehta, K.; Virkar, A.V. Fracture mechanisms in ferroelectric-ferroelastic lead zirconate titanate (Zr: Ti = 0.54: 0.46) ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Palai, R.; Katiyar, R.; Schmid, H.; Tissot, P.; Clark, S.; Robertson, J.; Redfern, S.; Catalan, G.; Scott, J. β phase and γ-β metal-insulator transition in multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 014110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhang, F.; Zeng, X.; Bi, D.; Guo, K.; Yao, Y.; Lu, S. Dielectric, ferroelectric, and magnetic properties of Sm-doped BiFeO3 ceramics prepared by a modified solid-state-reaction method. Materials 2018, 11, 2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ramirez, F.E.N.; Pasca, G.A.C.; Souza, J.A. Possible misleading interpretations on magnetic and transport properties in BiFeO3 nanoparticles caused by impurity phase. Phys. Lett. A 2015, 379, 1549–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maurya, D.; Sardarinejad, A.; Alameh, K. Recent developments in RF magnetron sputtered thin films for pH sensing applications—An overview. Coatings 2014, 4, 756–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Neaton, J.; Zheng, H.; Nagarajan, V.; Ogale, S.; Liu, B.; Viehland, D.; Vaithyanathan, V.; Schlom, D.; Waghmare, U.; et al. Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures. Science 2003, 299, 1719–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chang, H.; Yuan, F.; Tien, S.; Li, P.; Wang, C.; Tu, C.; Jen, S. High quality multiferroic BiFeO3 films prepared by pulsed laser deposition on glass substrates at reduced temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 17D917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, T.; Kan, Y.; Jin, Y.; Lu, X.; Wu, H.; He, J.; Lu, X.; Zhu, W.; Huang, F.; Zhu, J. Effect of substrates on magnetization of BiFeO3 films. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 075303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gomez-Iriarte, G.A.; Labre, C.; de Oliveira, L.A.S.; Sinnecker, J.P. Pure phase BiFeO3 thin films sputtered over Si: A new route towards high magnetization. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 460, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, P.W.; Guttag, M.; Tu, C.S. Surface modification of multiferroic BiFeO3 ceramic by argon sputtering. J. Surf. Eng. Mater. Adv. Technol. 2014, 4, 295–308. [Google Scholar]
  14. Giraldo, D.; Almodóvar, P.; López, M.; Rodríguez-Aguado, E.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Galdámez, A.; Álvarez-Serrano, I. Exploring multiferroicity in BiFeO3-NaNbO3 thermistor electroceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 7069–7076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Suresh, P.; Srinath, S. Effect of synthesis route on the multiferroic properties of BiFeO3: A comparative study between solid state and sol–gel methods. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 649, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Young, R.A. The Rietveld Method; International Union of Crystallography: New York, NY, USA, 1993; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Phys. Condens. Matter 1993, 192, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Oliveira, L.A.S.; Pirota, K.R. Synthesis, structural and magnetic characterization of highly ordered single crystalline BiFeO3 nanotubes. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48, 1593–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yamashita, T.; Hayes, P. Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in oxide materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 2441–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pélisson-Schecker, A.; Hug, H.; Patscheider, J. Charge referencing issues in XPS of insulators as evidenced in the case of Al-Si-N thin films. Surf. Interface Anal. 2012, 44, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Greczynski, G.; Hultman, L. The same chemical state of carbon gives rise to two peaks in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mansour, A.; Brizzolara, R.A. Characterization of the surface of FeO powder by XPS. Surf. Sci. Spectra 1996, 4, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Militello, M.C.; Simko, S.J. Palladium oxide (PdO) by XPS. Surf. Sci. Spectra 1994, 3, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vasquez, R.P. Cu2O by XPS. Surf. Sci. Spectra 1998, 5, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, P.; Li, D.; Wu, L.; Shi, L. The magnetic and structural properties of BiFeO3-x (0 < x < 3) thin films with controllable oxygen vacancy. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 12594–12598. [Google Scholar]
  26. Seah, M.P.; Briggs, D. Practical Surface Analysis: Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  27. Briggs, D. Surface Analysis of Polymers by XPS and Static SIMS; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998; pp. 112–113. [Google Scholar]
  28. Debies, T.P.; Rabalais, J.W. X-ray photoelectron spectra and electronic structure of Bi2X3 (X=O, S, Se, Te). Chem. Phys. 1977, 20, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schuhl, Y.; Baussart, H.; Delobel, R.; Le Bras, M.; Leroy, J.; Gengembre, L.; Grimblot, J. Study of mixed-oxide catalysts containing bismuth, vanadium and antimony. Preparation, phase composition, spectroscopic characterization and catalytic oxidation of propene. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases 1983, 79, 2055–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mazumdar, D.; Knut, R.; Thöle, F.; Gorgoi, M.; Faleev, S.; Mryasov, O.N.; Shelke, V.; Ederer, C.; Spaldin, N.A.; Gupta, A.; et al. The valence band electronic structure of rhombohedral-like and tetragonal-like BiFeO3 thin films from hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and first-principles theory. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2016, 208, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ettema, A.R.H.F.; Haas, C. An X-ray photoemission spectroscopy study of interlayer charge transfer in some misfit layer compounds. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1993, 5, 3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Naumkin, A.V.; Kraut-Vass, A.; Gaarenstroom, S.W.; Powell, C.J. NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database. 2012. Available online: https://srdata.nist.gov/xps/ (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  33. Briggs, D.; Beamson, G. XPS studies of the oxygen 1s and 2s levels in a wide range of functional polymers. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1517–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fujii, T.; De Groot, F.M.F.; Sawatzky, G.A.; Voogt, F.C.; Hibma, T.; Okada, K. In situ XPS analysis of various iron oxide films grown by NO2-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, T.; Wei, J.; Guo, Y.; Lv, Z.; Xu, Z.; Cheng, Z. Manipulation of oxygen vacancy for high photovoltaic output in bismuth ferrite films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 23372–23381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lu, H.; Hao, Q.; Chen, T.; Zhang, L.; Chen, D.; Ma, C.; Yao, W.; Zhu, Y. A high-performance Bi2O3/Bi2SiO5 pn heterojunction photocatalyst induced by phase transition of Bi2O3. Appl. Catal. Environ. 2018, 237, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ibrahim, S.; Bonnet, P.; Sarakha, M.; Caperaa, C.; Monier, G.; Bousquet, A. Tailoring the structural and optical properties of bismuth oxide films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering for photocatalytic application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 243, 122580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gupta, R.; Sen, S. Calculation of multiplet structure of core p-vacancy levels. Phys. Rev. B 1974, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grosvenor, A.; Kobe, B.; Biesinger, M.; McIntyre, N. Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds. Surf. Interface Anal. 2004, 36, 1564–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bhargava, G.; Gouzman, I.; Chun, C.; Ramanarayanan, T.; Bernasek, S. Characterization of the “native” surface thin film on pure polycrystalline iron: A high resolution XPS and TEM study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 4322–4329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kowalczyk, S.; Ley, L.; McFeely, F.; Shirley, D. Multiplet splitting of the manganese 2p and 3p levels in MnF2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 1975, 11, 1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lin, T.C.; Seshadri, G.; Kelber, J.A. A consistent method for quantitative XPS peak analysis of thin oxide films on clean polycrystalline iron surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1997, 119, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Balakrishnan, R.; Dixit, A.; Rao, M.R.; Naik, R. Influence of Ca doping on X-ray photoelectron core-level spectra of magnetoelectric bulk BiFeO3. Surf. Interface Anal. 2021, 53, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wilson, D.; Langell, M. XPS analysis of oleylamine/oleic acid capped Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a function of temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 303, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Catalan, G.; Scott, J.F. Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2463–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.; Luo, L.; Han, C.; Yun, R.; Tang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Nie, Z.; Zhao, W.; Feng, Z. The microstructure, electric, optical and photovoltaic properties of BiFeO3 thin films prepared by low temperature sol–gel method. Materials 2019, 12, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, D.; Niu, F.; Qin, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, N.; Huang, Y. Defective BiFeO3 with surface oxygen vacancies: Facile synthesis and mechanism insight into photocatalytic performance. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 171, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, R.; Liu, S.; Kong, F.; Tong, J.; Ruan, L.; Duan, Q.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, X. α-Fe2O3/BiFeO3 composites as visible-active photocatalysts and their optical response mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2020, 141, 109329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Giampietri, A.; Drera, G.; Píš, I.; Magnano, E.; Sangaletti, L. Tracking the amorphous to epitaxial transition in RF-sputtered cubic BFO-STO heterojunctions by means of X-ray photoelectron diffraction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 132903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Terada, N.; Widodo, R.; Itoh, K.; Kong, S.; Kashiwabara, H.; Okuda, T.; Obara, K.; Niki, S.; Sakurai, K.; Yamada, A.; et al. Characterization of interface nature and band alignment in CBD-CdS/Cu(In, Ga)Se2 bi-layer structure by photoemission and inverse photoemission spectroscopy. Thin Solid Film. 2005, 480, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, H.; Dai, B.; Wang, W.; Lu, C.; Kou, J.; Ni, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, Z. Oriented built-in electric field introduced by surface gradient diffusion doping for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution in CdS nanorods. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3803–3808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xie, F.; Gong, L.; Liu, X.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, S.; Meng, H.; Chen, J. XPS studies on surface reduction of tungsten oxide nanowire film by Ar+ bombardment. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2012, 185, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, H.; Zeng, F.; Lin, Y.; Wang, G.; Pan, F. Correlation of oxygen vacancy variations to band gap changes in epitaxial ZnO thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 181908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lewin, E.; Counsell, J.; Patscheider, J. Spectral artefacts post sputter-etching and how to cope with them—A case study of XPS on nitride-based coatings using monoatomic and cluster ion beams. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 442, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, K.; Fan, H.; Ren, P.; Yang, C. Structural, electronic and optical properties of BiFeO3 studied by first-principles. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 1901–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Rietveld refinement plots for the BiFeO 3 film deposited in an argon atmosphere at low pressure (unetched sample). The experimental pattern (green dots), the calculated pattern (solid black line), and the difference between them (blue line below patterns) are shown. The calculated Bragg positions are also shown (vertical red lines).
Figure 1. Rietveld refinement plots for the BiFeO 3 film deposited in an argon atmosphere at low pressure (unetched sample). The experimental pattern (green dots), the calculated pattern (solid black line), and the difference between them (blue line below patterns) are shown. The calculated Bragg positions are also shown (vertical red lines).
Materials 15 04285 g001
Figure 2. XPS survey spectra of BFO thin-film: (bottom black) unetched and (top red) with 2680 s of argon etching time inside the XPS chamber. The peaks marked with (#) and (*) correspond to Bi 5 p 1 / 2 and Fe 3 s respectively.
Figure 2. XPS survey spectra of BFO thin-film: (bottom black) unetched and (top red) with 2680 s of argon etching time inside the XPS chamber. The peaks marked with (#) and (*) correspond to Bi 5 p 1 / 2 and Fe 3 s respectively.
Materials 15 04285 g002
Figure 3. High-resolution XPS spectra showing the evolution of C 1 s peaks with Ar + etching time at 0 s, 40 s and 80 s.
Figure 3. High-resolution XPS spectra showing the evolution of C 1 s peaks with Ar + etching time at 0 s, 40 s and 80 s.
Materials 15 04285 g003
Figure 4. High-resolution XPS spectra from core level O 1 s showing the peaks evolution with Ar + etching time at (a) 0 s, (b) 80 s and (c) 2680 s.
Figure 4. High-resolution XPS spectra from core level O 1 s showing the peaks evolution with Ar + etching time at (a) 0 s, (b) 80 s and (c) 2680 s.
Materials 15 04285 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of Bi 5 d and O 2 s peaks with Ar + etching time at (a) 0, (b) 80 and (c) 2680 s. The metallic bismuth doublet peak appears as a function of etching time, indicating a progressive increase in oxygen loss on the BFO surface.
Figure 5. Evolution of Bi 5 d and O 2 s peaks with Ar + etching time at (a) 0, (b) 80 and (c) 2680 s. The metallic bismuth doublet peak appears as a function of etching time, indicating a progressive increase in oxygen loss on the BFO surface.
Materials 15 04285 g005
Figure 6. Evolution of Bi 4 f doublet peak with Ar + etching time at (a) 0, (b) 80 and (c) 2680 s. The metallic bismuth doublet peak appears as a function of etching time, indicating a progressive increase in oxygen loss on the BFO surface.
Figure 6. Evolution of Bi 4 f doublet peak with Ar + etching time at (a) 0, (b) 80 and (c) 2680 s. The metallic bismuth doublet peak appears as a function of etching time, indicating a progressive increase in oxygen loss on the BFO surface.
Materials 15 04285 g006
Figure 7. Fe 2 p peaks evolution with Ar + etching time at (a) 0 s, (b) 80 s and (c) 2680 s. The enhancement of the Fe 2 + contribution, and the appearance of the metallic iron can be viewed as a function of etching time, indicating a progressive increase in oxygen loss in the BFO surface.
Figure 7. Fe 2 p peaks evolution with Ar + etching time at (a) 0 s, (b) 80 s and (c) 2680 s. The enhancement of the Fe 2 + contribution, and the appearance of the metallic iron can be viewed as a function of etching time, indicating a progressive increase in oxygen loss in the BFO surface.
Materials 15 04285 g007
Figure 8. Evolution of Bi 4 f and Fe 2 p species concentrations with Ar + etching time.
Figure 8. Evolution of Bi 4 f and Fe 2 p species concentrations with Ar + etching time.
Materials 15 04285 g008
Figure 9. Evolution with Ar + etching time of: (a) Valence band at 0 s, 80 s and 2680 s; (b) Valence band maximum (VBM).
Figure 9. Evolution with Ar + etching time of: (a) Valence band at 0 s, 80 s and 2680 s; (b) Valence band maximum (VBM).
Materials 15 04285 g009
Table 1. Binding energies from Fe 2 p core level.
Table 1. Binding energies from Fe 2 p core level.
Fe 2 p PeakBinding Energy (eV)
Fe 2 +   2 p 3 / 2 709.6
Fe 3 +   2 p 3 / 2 710.1
Fe 2 + sat. 2 p 3 / 2 713.9
Fe 3 + sat. 2 p 3 / 2 718.6
Fe 2 +   2 p 1 / 2 723.1
Fe 3 +   2 p 1 / 2 723.6
Fe 2 + sat. 2 p 1 / 2 727.8
Fe 3 + sat. 2 p 1 / 2 731.6
Fe ( 0 )   2 p 3 / 2 707.9
Fe ( 0 )   2 p 1 / 2 720.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomez-Iriarte, G.A.; Pentón-Madrigal, A.; de Oliveira, L.A.S.; Sinnecker, J.P. XPS Study in BiFeO3 Surface Modified by Argon Etching. Materials 2022, 15, 4285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124285

AMA Style

Gomez-Iriarte GA, Pentón-Madrigal A, de Oliveira LAS, Sinnecker JP. XPS Study in BiFeO3 Surface Modified by Argon Etching. Materials. 2022; 15(12):4285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomez-Iriarte, Grecia Alejandra, Arbelio Pentón-Madrigal, Luiz Augusto Sousa de Oliveira, and João Paulo Sinnecker. 2022. "XPS Study in BiFeO3 Surface Modified by Argon Etching" Materials 15, no. 12: 4285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124285

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop