Next Article in Journal
Improved Equations for the Torsional Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams for Codes of Practice Based on the Space Truss Analogy
Next Article in Special Issue
Corrosion Layers on Archaeological Cast Iron from Nanhai I
Previous Article in Journal
The Electrical Response of Real Dielectrics: Using the Voltage Ramp Method as a Straightforward Diagnostic Tool for Polymeric Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emerging Glass Industry Patterns in Late Antiquity Balkans and Beyond: New Analytical Findings on Foy 3.2 and Foy 2.1 Glass Types
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Cultural Heritage of “Black Stones” (Lapis Aequipondus/Martyrum) of Leopardi’s Child Home (Recanati, Italy)

Materials 2022, 15(11), 3828; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113828
by Patrizia Santi 1, Stefano Pagnotta 2, Vincenzo Palleschi 3, Maria Perla Colombini 4 and Alberto Renzulli 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2022, 15(11), 3828; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113828
Submission received: 11 April 2022 / Revised: 15 May 2022 / Accepted: 17 May 2022 / Published: 27 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Material Analysis in Cultural Heritage)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. The abstract must be revised with the core novelty of the work.
  2. The introduction section must be elaborated with a few more latest and appropriate references.
  3. Justification for the selection of rocks should be properly elucidated.
  4. The novelty of the current research must be clearly explained in the manuscript. 
  5. The methodology should be given in a flow chart to increase the readability
  6. The discussion on results should be elaborated based on the attained results. However, the current discussion only gives a brief explanation but not a proper justification. Scientific justification of results must be presented.
  7. figures quality must be improved.
  8. English of the manuscript must be improved
  9. conclusions should be revised according to the findings and future scope of the current work also must be stated in this section. 

 

 

 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment"

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

ABSTRACT:

Row 12: these stones instead of these stone

INTRODUCTION

No comments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

No comments.

RESULTS

Figure 2 shows representative spectra. There are qualitative and quantitative differences between the spectra of the four stones? Please comment or specify this within the text.

It is recommended to analyze a specimen from the same rock native to Tuscany and make a comparison on similar experimental data. Or at least compare it with existing literature data.

DISCUSSION

There is a problem with Figure 3; please check its full position on the page!

Maybe a short comparison on the lithology of every cited stone will be welcomed, by resuming data into a table.

CONCLUSIONS

No comment.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment" 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I feel the manuscript can be accepted in its present form. 

Back to TopTop