Next Article in Journal
The Importance of Structural Factors for the Electrochemical Performance of Graphene/Carbon Nanotube/Melamine Powders towards the Catalytic Activity of Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Mg Addition on the Microstructure and Properties of a Heat-Affected Zone in Submerged Arc Welding of an Al-Killed Low Carbon Steel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/ma14092447
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Humidity Effects on Domain Structure and Polarization Switching of Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3-x%PbTiO3 (PZN-x%PT) Single Crystals

by
Hongli Wang
1,2 and
Kaiyang Zeng
3,*
1
The Key Lab of Guangdong for Modern Surface Engineering Technology, National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Materials Surface Engineering Technology, Institute of New Materials, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Storage Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117576, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(9), 2447; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092447
Submission received: 17 April 2021 / Revised: 2 May 2021 / Accepted: 5 May 2021 / Published: 9 May 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effect of relative humidity on the domain structure imaging and polarization switching process of Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3-x%PbTiO3 (PZN-x%PT) ferroelectric single crystals has been investigated by means of the piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and piezoresponse force spectroscopy (PFS) techniques. It was found that the PFM amplitude increases with the relative humidity, and that the ferroelectric hysteresis loops at different relative humidity levels show that the coercive bias decreases with the increase in relative humidity. These observed phenomena are attributed to the existence of the water layer between the probe tip and the sample surface in a humid atmosphere, which could affect the effect of the electric field distribution and screening properties at the ferroelectric sample surface. These results provide a better understanding of the water adsorption phenomena at the nanoscale in regard to the fundamental understanding of ferroelectrics’ properties.

1. Introduction

The superior piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties of ferroelectric materials have made them promising candidates for non-volatile random access memories (NVRAMs), microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), high-performance transducers, sensors, and actuators [1,2,3]. These applications are closely related to their domain configurations and polarization states, motivating extensive investigations on the domain structures and polarization switching characteristics of ferroelectric materials [2,4,5]. With the rapid development of the scanning probe microscopy (SPM) technique, it has already been widely used for investigating ferroelectric domains on the micro- and nano-scale [5,6,7]. In particular, piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and piezoresponse force spectroscopy (PFS) measurements are commonly used for the direct characterization of the local ferroelectric domain structures and polarization switching behaviors, respectively [8,9,10]. Among these studies, it was noted that the properties of ferroelectric materials could be extremely sensitive to the ambient humidity [11,12,13,14,15].
In the last two decades, thanks to advances in humidity sensor technology [16,17,18], humidity’s effects on ferroelectric materials have attracted numerous research interests and have been studied by theoretical, experimental, and numerical simulation methods [11,19,20,21]. It is generally believed that the formation of a water meniscus between the tip and the sample surface plays a crucial role in the SPM characterization of ferroelectric materials in ambient humid atmospheres [22,23,24,25]. However, there is no consensus on the underlying mechanism by which the water layer affects the property characterization of ferroelectric materials by SPM. Some researchers have ascribed this phenomenon to the existence of the screening charges through ionized species from the water layer present under ambient conditions [21,26,27,28]. Some other researchers have attributed it to the electrocapillary phenomena at the tip–surface junction, and their interaction with bias-induced materials responses [22]. In addition, the observed phenomena were believed to be caused by the redistribution of the switching electric field due to the existence of the conductive adsorption surface layer [29,30]. Since the study of the water adsorption phenomena at the nanoscale is significant for advancing the fundamental understanding of ferroelectric properties, it is essential to clarify the effect of relative humidity on ferroelectrics.
In this work, two SPM techniques, including PFM and PFS, were used to characterize the domain structure and ferroelectric hysteresis loops of PZN-x%PT single crystals under various relative humidities. The purpose of this work was to study the effect of relative humidity on the domain structure imaging and polarization switching properties of PZN-x%PT single crystals, and to explore the possible mechanisms involved therein.

2. Materials and Methods

PZN-x%PT single crystals (supplied by Microfine Materials Technology Pte. Ltd., Singapore) grown by an improved flux method were used in this work [31]. After being oriented into (100)L(010)W(001)T orientations, the samples were cut into dimensions of 4 mm (L) × 4 mm (W) × 0.5 mm (T). Then, the samples were polished to a mirror finish.
A commercial SPM instrument (MFP-3D, Asylum Research, Oxford Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was used to carry out the piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and piezoresponse force spectroscopy (PFS) measurements for the acquisition of the domain structure and the ferroelectric hysteresis loops, respectively. The PFM and PFS measurements were performed using conductive PtIr-coated silicon tips (l ≈ 150 μm, f ~ 160 kHz, k ≈ 7.4) (PPP-NCSTPt, Nannosensors, Switzerland). Before each measurement, the probe was calibrated to guarantee data reliability. All the SPM measurements were conducted at room temperature (25 °C), which was much lower than the Curie temperature of PZN-x%PT (160 °C) [32]. In the PFS measurements, three loops were obtained at each point to ensure repeatability. The negative (VN) and positive (VP) switching bias could be extracted from the hysteresis loops, and the coercive bias and imprint bias could be calculated by Vc = (VP − VN)/2 and Vi = (VN + VP)/2, respectively [33]. The relative humidity control was achieved through a closed electrical cell (Figures S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Materials). More detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Materials.

3. Results and Discussion

To explore the effects of relative humidity on the ferroelectric domain structure imaging, the topography, PFM amplitude, and phase images of the PZN-9%PT single crystal were measured with a scan area of 10 × 10 μm2 (Figure 1). It can be seen that there were two types of contrast, and that they had an approximately 180° phase angle difference, which represents two opposite polarity directions, i.e., one was upward and the other was downward [1,34]. Figure 1d,e shows the PFM amplitude and phase distribution with relative humidity at 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, and 65%. It clearly demonstrates that the PFM amplitude increased with the relative humidity, while the phase angle difference remained around 180°, without any significant change with relative humidity. Previous studies have reported that the ambient humidity could affect SPM imaging because a water layer could be formed between the SPM probe tip and the sample surface due to the condensation of water molecules in the surrounding environment [12,21,29]. Therefore, below, we will explore how this water layer affects the PFM amplitude of the ferroelectric domains.
Figure 2 shows the schematics of the water layer between the tip and the sample surface. When the relative humidity was low, the effective contact area of the water layer was relatively small, and the effective contact area increased with relative humidity. This can be validated by the domain growth studies in different relative humidities, which report that the domain size increases with the relative humidity [30,35]. The difference of the effective contact area can affect the electric field strength and distribution between the probe tip and the sample surface. Numerical simulation has revealed that the electric field can be weakened by the thin water layer at low humidity, while being enhanced by the thick water layer at high humidity with the same applied bias [28,36]. This may explain why the amplitude increased with increasing relative humidities from one aspect. Besides, the water layer contains charge species and helps with the formation of the screening layer on the surface of ferroelectric materials [27,28]. This screening layer could weaken or neutralize the depolarization field [22]. Therefore, the effective electric field, which is employed to measure the PFM images, increased at high relative humidities. This could be employed to interpret why the amplitude increased with relative humidity from another aspect.
Relative humidity affected not only the PFM imaging process, but also influenced the characterization of the polarization switching properties through the adsorption of molecular water and ambient charge species [12,20,21,29,36]. Hence, the effects of relative humidity on the ferroelectric switching behavior of PZN-9%PT single crystal were investigated. Figure 3a–c shows the amplitude, phase, and piezoresponse hysteresis loops of a PZN-9%PT single crystal with the relative humidity in the range from 4% to 60%. The coercive bias and imprint (Figure 3d) were extracted from the mathematical analysis of the loops [37]. It clearly shows that the coercive bias decreased with relative humidity. This phenomenon can be ascribed to the abovementioned water layer formed between the probe tip and the sample surface [27,28]. This water layer can influence the switching behavior in two aspects. One is that this water layer changes the electric field strength and distribution [20,29,36], and the other is that this water layer affects the sample surface screening properties of ferroelectric materials through the adsorption of charge carriers [21,27]. Since the electric field was weakened at a low relative humidity, while enhanced at high relative humidity [28,36], that is why the coercive bias decreased with the relative humidity.
Figure 3d also shows that the imprint increases with the relative humidity. Previous studies have shown that the imprint of ferroelectric materials can be affected by various factors, including the screening layer through surface trapped charges species [38,39,40]. With the increase in the relative humidity, the amount of adsorbed water molecules increased, and more charge species were introduced. These charge species were bound to the ferroelectric material surface and favored one specific polarization direction. In this work, the hysteresis loops were obtained in the domains with downward direction, and the imprint shifted towards the direction that preferred the downward direction. This indicates that the adsorbed water molecules can help to stabilize the original preferential polarization direction, which is consistent with the results of previous studies [11,27].
To further validate the effect of the water layer on the polarization switching properties of PZN-x%PT single crystals, hysteresis loops in the ambient air (with a humidity of 60–70%) and in synthetic air (21% oxygen, 79% nitrogen, and moisture content < 5 ppm) were obtained (Figure 4). In our experiments, the relative humidity was adjusted by mixing different ratios of synthetic air and ambient air in a closed cell (Figures S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Materials). When the relative humidity was extremely low (<1%), the closed cell was almost entirely filled with synthetic air, which contained only pure nitrogen and oxygen, without water molecules or charge carriers. Figure 4c,f show the hysteresis loops obtained in the ambient air and the synthetic air, respectively. It can be seen that the hysteresis loops obtained in the ambient air demonstrated typical shapes of the ferroelectric materials, i.e., the amplitude loop showed a butterfly shape, and the phase loop presented an approximately 180° difference. In contrast to the hysteresis loops obtained in the ambient air, the hysteresis loops acquired in the synthetic air did not show any obvious polarization switching characteristics; the amplitude loops displayed an irregular rhombus shape, and the phase loops showed a certain degree of oscillations, which are smaller than 180°, suggesting that the polarization switching process was not successfully achieved in the synthetic air atmosphere.
In addition, the PFM phase images before and after the polarization switching processes in different atmospheres are shown in Figure 4a,b,d,e. For the phase images acquired in the synthetic air, the marks of the PFS points are clearly seen in the PFM phase images after the PFS measurements, while no obvious marks can be seen in the PFM phase images obtained after the PFS measurements in the ambient air. This difference can be explained by the presence of humidity. For the hysteresis loops obtained in the ambient air, due to the presence of humidity, which contains free charge carriers, the charges generated during the PFS process can be compensated. For the hysteresis loops obtained in the synthetic air, there was not sufficient humidity to provide free charge carriers to compensate for the tip-generated charges. Therefore, the charges generated during the PFS process accumulated on the surface of the sample. That is why the PFS points are visible in the PFM images obtained in the synthetic air. Considering the phase images and the hysteresis loops obtained in different atmospheres, it is believed that the polarization switching process can be promoted by the charge carriers and moisture in the ambient air. Based on the different results in synthetic air and ambient air, it can be concluded that the charge carriers and moisture in the ambient air can facilitate the polarization switching of PZN-x%PT single crystals, i.e., reduce the coercive bias for polarization switching.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the effects of relative humidity on the domain structure imaging and polarization switching properties of PZN-x%PT single crystals were investigated by PFM and PFS techniques. It was found that the PFM amplitude increased with the relative humidity, while the PFM phase had no significant relative humidity dependence. In addition, the ferroelectric hysteresis loops at different relative humidity levels showed that the coercive bias decreased with the relative humidity, while the imprint increased with the relative humidity. The water layer formed between the probe tip and the sample surface due to the condensation of water molecules in the environment was employed to explain the above results. Specifically, the electric field was weakened with the thin water layer at a low relative humidity, while it was enhanced with a thick water layer at a high relative humidity. The study on the polarization switching behaviors in the ambient air and synthetic air revealed that the coercive bias in synthetic air was larger than that in the ambient air, suggesting that the charge species and moisture in the ambient air can facilitate the polarization switching process. These results provided a better understanding of the experimental contribution of the water layer to the domain structure and ferroelectric hysteresis loop measurements of ferroelectric relaxors in SPM studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma14092447/s1, Figure S1: Images of the closed electrical cell: (a) the top part; and (b) the bottom part., Figure S2: (a) schematic of humidity control system; and (b) image of the humidity control system used in this study.

Author Contributions

Literature search, H.W.; experiment design and implementation, H.W.; figure, H.W.; data analysis, H.W. and K.Z.; Writing, H.W. and K.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education (MoE) Singapore through the National University of Singapore (NUS) under the Academic Research Fund (AcRF) of R-265-000-406-112, R-265-000-495-112, and R-265-000-596-112; Guangdong Academy of Sciences Program (No. 2020GDASYL-20200103110), and Key Laboratory Evaluation Project of Guangdong Province (No. 2020B1212060049).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kholkin, D.A.L.; Kalinin, D.S.V.; Roelofs, D.A.; Gruverman, P.A. Review of Ferroelectric Domain Imaging by Piezoresponse Force Microscopy. In Scanning Probe Microscopy; Kalinin, S., Gruverman, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 173–214. ISBN 978-0-387-28667-9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kalinin, S.V.; Morozovska, A.N.; Chen, L.Q.; Rodriguez, B.J. Local polarization dynamics in ferroelectric materials. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2010, 73, 056502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, Y. Introduction: Characteristics of ferroelectrics. In Ferroelectric Materials and their Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, T.; Zeng, K. Probing of Local Multifield Coupling Phenomena of Advanced Materials by Scanning Probe Microscopy Techniques. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1803064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Alexe, M.; Gruverman, A. Nanoscale Characterisation of Ferroelectric Materials: Scanning Probe Microscopy Approach; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; ISBN 978-3-540-20662-0. [Google Scholar]
  6. Poggi, M.A.; Gadsby, A.E.D.; Bottomley, L.A.; King, W.P.; Oroudjev, E.; Hansma, H. Scanning Probe Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 3429–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Tikhomirov, O.; Labardi, M.; Allegrini, M. Scanning Probe Microscopy Applied to Ferroelectric Materials. 2D Nanoelectron. 2006, 217–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Balke, N.; Schenk, T.; Stolichnov, I.; Gruverman, A. Chapter 7.1—Piezoresponse Force Microscopy (PFM). In Ferroelectricity in Doped Hafnium Oxide: Materials, Properties and Devices; Schroeder, U., Hwang, C.S., Funakubo, H., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 291–316. ISBN 978-0-08-102430-0. [Google Scholar]
  9. Soergel, E. Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 464003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Morozovska, A.N.; Kalinin, S.V.; Eliseev, E.A.; Svechnikov, S.V. Local Polarization Switching in Piezoresponse Force Microscopy. Ferroelectrics 2007, 354, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Blaser, C.; Paruch, P. Subcritical switching dynamics and humidity effects in nanoscale studies of domain growth in ferroelectric thin films. N. J. Phys. 2015, 17, 13002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sun, X.; Su, Y.J.; Gao, K.W.; Guo, L.Q.; Qiao, L.J.; Chu, W.Y. The effect of humidity on nano-scaled domain switching in LiNbO3 single crystal. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 014103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dahan, D.; Molotskii, M.; Rosenman, G.; Rosenwaks, Y. Ferroelectric domain inversion: The role of humidity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 152902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Segura, J.J.; Domingo, N.; Fraxedas, J.; Verdaguer, A. Surface screening of written ferroelectric domains in ambient conditions. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 187213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Park, K.-W.; Seo, H.; Kim, J.; Seol, D.; Hong, J.; Kim, Y. Humidity effect of domain wall roughening behavior in ferroelectric copolymer thin films. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 355703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mistewicz, K.; Nowak, M.; Paszkiewicz, R.; Guiseppi-Elie, A. SbSI Nanosensors: From Gel to Single Nanowire Devices. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mistewicz, K.; Starczewska, A.; Jesionek, M.; Nowak, M.; Kozioł, M.; Stróż, D. Humidity dependent impedance characteristics of SbSeI nanowires. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 513, 145859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mistewicz, K. Recent Advances in Ferroelectric Nanosensors: Toward Sensitive Detection of Gas, Mechanothermal Signals, and Radiation. J. Nanomater. 2018, 2018, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, N.; Zhao, M.H.; Garra, J.; Kolpak, A.M.; Rappe, A.M.; Bonnell, D.A.; Vohs, J.M. Direct in situ determination of the polarization dependence of physisorption on ferroelectric surfaces. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bartošík, M.; Škoda, D.; Tomanec, O.; Kalousek, R.; Jánský, P.; Zlámal, J.; Spousta, J.; Dub, P.; Šikola, T. Role of humidity in local anodic oxidation: A study of water condensation and electric field distribution. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 195406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, D.Y.; Qiao, L.J.; Khodayari, M.; Volinsky, A.A. Electric field and humidity effects on adsorbed water behavior on BaTiO3 ferroelectric domains studied by scanning probe microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 084105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ievlev, A.V.; Morozovska, A.N.; Shur, V.; Kalinin, S. Humidity effects on tip-induced polarization switching in lithium niobate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 92908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Shishkina, E.V.; Pelegova, E.V.; Kosobokov, M.S.; Akhmatkhanov, A.R.; Yudin, P.V.; Dejneka, A.; Shur, V.Y. Influence of Humidity on Local Polarization Reversal in a Rb:KTP Single Crystal. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, W.; Wong, L.-M.; Wang, S.; Zeng, K. Effects of oxygen and moisture on the I-V characteristics of TiO2 thin films. J. Mater. 2018, 4, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. He, D.Y.; Qiao, L.J.; Volinsky, A.A.; Bai, Y.; Wu, M.; Chu, W.Y. Humidity effects on (001) BaTiO3 single crystal surface water adsorption. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 062905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Neumayer, S.M.; Strelcov, E.; Manzo, M.; Gallo, K.; Kravchenko, I.I.; Kholkin, A.L.; Kalinin, S.V.; Rodriguez, B.J. Thickness, humidity, and polarization dependent ferroelectric switching and conductivity in Mg doped lithium niobate. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 244103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Shur, V.; Ievlev, A.V.; Nikolaeva, E.V.; Shishkin, E.I.; Neradovskiy, M.M. Influence of adsorbed surface layer on domain growth in the field produced by conductive tip of scanning probe microscope in lithium niobate. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 052017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Weeks, B.L.; Vaughn, M.W.; DeYoreo, J.J. Direct Imaging of Meniscus Formation in Atomic Force Microscopy Using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8096–8098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ohara, K.; Cho, Y. Effect of the surface adsorbed water on the studying of ferroelectrics by scanning nonlinear dielectric microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 7460–7463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brugère, A.; Gidon, S.; Gautier, B. Finite element method simulation of the domain growth kinetics in single-crystal LiTaO3: Role of surface conductivity. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 052016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lim, L.; Rajan, K. High-homogeneity High-performance flux-grown Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3–(6–7)%PbTiO3 single crystals. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 271, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, Z.; Zu, J. Comparison of PZN-PT, PMN-PT Single Crystals and PZT Ceramic for Vibration Energy Harvesting. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 122, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jesse, S.; Lee, H.N.; Kalinin, S.V. Quantitative mapping of switching behavior in piezoresponse force microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006, 77, 73702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zeng, H.; Yu, H.; Chu, R.; Li, G.; Luo, H.; Yin, Q. Domain orientation imaging of PMN–PT single crystals by vertical and lateral piezoresponse force microscopy. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 267, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gautier, B.; Brugère, A.; Gidon, S. Impact of the ambient humidity on the kinetics of formation of ferroelectric domains in monocrystalline LiTaO3. Int. J. Nanosci. 2012, 11, 1240013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Scovell, D.L.; Pinkerton, T.D.; Finlayson, B.A.; Stuve, E.M. The dielectric response of water in high electric fields: Equilibrium water thickness and the field distribution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 294, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jesse, S.; Baddorf, A.P.; Kalinin, S.V. Switching spectroscopy piezoresponse force microscopy of ferroelectric materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 062908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tagantsev, A.K.; Gerra, G. Interface-induced phenomena in polarization response of ferroelectric thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 051607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Okatan, M.B.; Alpay, S.P. Imprint in ferroelectric materials due to space charges: A theoretical analysis. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 092902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lazareva, I.; Koval, Y.; Müller, P.; Müller, K.; Henkel, K.; Schmeisser, D. Interface screening and imprint in poly(vinylidene fluoride/trifluoroethylene) ferroelectric field effect transistors. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 054110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 02447 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Topography, (b) PFM amplitude, and (c) PFM phase images of the PZN−9%PT single crystal. (d,e) Histogram distribution of PFM amplitude and phase under various relative humidity levels from 5% to 65%.
Figure 1. (a) Topography, (b) PFM amplitude, and (c) PFM phase images of the PZN−9%PT single crystal. (d,e) Histogram distribution of PFM amplitude and phase under various relative humidity levels from 5% to 65%.
Materials 14 02447 g001
Materials 14 02447 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematics of the water layer between the tip and the sample surface: (a) low relative humidity and (b) high relative humidity.
Figure 2. Schematics of the water layer between the tip and the sample surface: (a) low relative humidity and (b) high relative humidity.
Materials 14 02447 g002
Materials 14 02447 g003 550
Figure 3. Hysteresis loops of a PZN−9%PT single crystal with relative humidities varying from 4% to 60%: (a) amplitude loop, (b) phase loop, and (c) calculated piezoresponse loop. (d) Coercive bias and imprint as a function of the humidity.
Figure 3. Hysteresis loops of a PZN−9%PT single crystal with relative humidities varying from 4% to 60%: (a) amplitude loop, (b) phase loop, and (c) calculated piezoresponse loop. (d) Coercive bias and imprint as a function of the humidity.
Materials 14 02447 g003
Materials 14 02447 g004 550
Figure 4. (a,d) PFM phase images of PZN−9%PT before PFS in the ambient air and the synthetic air, respectively; (b,e) PFM phase images after PFS in the ambient air and the synthetic air, respectively; and (c,f) hysteresis loops in the ambient air and the synthetic air, respectively.
Figure 4. (a,d) PFM phase images of PZN−9%PT before PFS in the ambient air and the synthetic air, respectively; (b,e) PFM phase images after PFS in the ambient air and the synthetic air, respectively; and (c,f) hysteresis loops in the ambient air and the synthetic air, respectively.
Materials 14 02447 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Zeng, K. Humidity Effects on Domain Structure and Polarization Switching of Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3-x%PbTiO3 (PZN-x%PT) Single Crystals. Materials 2021, 14, 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092447

AMA Style

Wang H, Zeng K. Humidity Effects on Domain Structure and Polarization Switching of Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3-x%PbTiO3 (PZN-x%PT) Single Crystals. Materials. 2021; 14(9):2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Hongli, and Kaiyang Zeng. 2021. "Humidity Effects on Domain Structure and Polarization Switching of Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3-x%PbTiO3 (PZN-x%PT) Single Crystals" Materials 14, no. 9: 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop