Next Article in Journal
Spatially Ordered Arrays of Colloidal Inorganic Metal Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals via Controlled Droplet Evaporation in a Confined Geometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Back-Propagation Neural Network Optimized by K-Fold Cross-Validation for Prediction of Torsional Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beam
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Process Parameters on Grain Size and Texture Evolution of Fe-3.2 wt.-% Si Non-Oriented Electrical Steels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilizing Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Superplasticizer Demand of Self-Consolidating Concrete Incorporating Pumice, Slag, and Fly Ash Powders
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Lamb Wave Based Structural Damage Detection Using Stationarity Tests

Materials 2021, 14(22), 6823; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226823
by Phong B. Dao 1,2,* and Wieslaw J. Staszewski 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Materials 2021, 14(22), 6823; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226823
Submission received: 25 September 2021 / Revised: 28 October 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Trends in Structural Health Monitoring)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

see file attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Major revisions

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The author presented a state-of-the-art approach to detecting damages in thin plates based on the statistical analysis of stationarity (or nonstationarity) of Lamb waves. The work was well presented and the results were well analyzed and discussed. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

  1. There are too many grammatical problems in the written English that should be improved before the acception;
  2. The author should clealy state the application of the proposed method in the different types of damage;
  3. In the experimental verification, the surface morphology and the specific shape of the designed damage should be presented;
  4. The figures can be improved to better illustrate the results;
  5. The errors and the efficiency of the proposed method should be analyzed by comparison with other methods;
  6. The conclusions are suggested to be itemized for better compresion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 4 Report

Accpetance for publication is suggested with the expection of their future work.

Back to TopTop