Next Article in Journal
Effect of Novel Bioactive Glass-Containing Dentin Adhesive on the Permeability of Demineralized Dentin
Next Article in Special Issue
Magnetically Recovered Co and Co@Pt Catalysts Prepared by Galvanic Replacement on Aluminum Powder for Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride
Previous Article in Journal
Fatigue Life Prediction of Machined Specimens with the Consideration of Surface Roughness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metal Borohydrides beyond Groups I and II: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalytic Behavior of Iron-Containing Cubic Spinel in the Hydrolysis and Hydrothermolysis of Ammonia Borane

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Lavrentieva Av. 5, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(18), 5422; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185422
Submission received: 27 August 2021 / Revised: 15 September 2021 / Accepted: 16 September 2021 / Published: 19 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Concepts for Improvement of Hydrogen Storage Hydride Materials)

Abstract

:
The paper presents a comparative study of the activity of magnetite (Fe3O4) and copper and cobalt ferrites with the structure of a cubic spinel synthesized by combustion of glycine-nitrate precursors in the reactions of ammonia borane (NH3BH3) hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis. It was shown that the use of copper ferrite in the studied reactions of NH3BH3 dehydrogenation has the advantages of a high catalytic activity and the absence of an induction period in the H2 generation curve due to the activating action of copper on the reduction of iron. Two methods have been proposed to improve catalytic activity of Fe3O4-based systems: (1) replacement of a portion of Fe2+ cations in the spinel by active cations including Cu2+ and (2) preparation of highly dispersed multiphase oxide systems, involving oxide of copper.

1. Introduction

Ammonia borane (NH3BH3, AB) is an extensively studied hydride and dozens of review articles have already appeared discussing the results of these studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The high hydrogen content of this hydride (19.6 wt%) allows it to be applied in a variety of fields: as hydrogen storage systems to generate hydrogen for the needs of hydrogen economy [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], as a component of fuels [11,12], as a reducing agent in fine organic synthesis [13] and in the synthesis of metallic nanoparticles [14,15].
Different ways have been employed to release hydrogen from ammonia borane. Processes of its solid-state dehydrogenation from different hydride-containing materials have been described [5,7]. Processes of its dehydrogenation in organic solvents are also studied [16] (including with the use of catalysts [17]). Catalytic hydrolysis of AB is a simple and most widely used process (1):
NH3BH3 + 3H2O → NH3 + H3BO3 + 3H2
NH3 +H2O ↔ NH4+ + OH
This process is traditionally carried out in an excess of water at room temperature in the presence of various catalysts [8,9,10,18,19]. Because of the high content of water, this process has a low value of gravimetric hydrogen density (GHD < 1 wt%), which is calculated using the ratio of the mass of released hydrogen to the total mass of all reactants and components of the hydrogen-generating system.
Hydrothermolysis is another water-employing process for the release of hydrogen from AB [20,21,22,23] where a highly exothermic process of AB hydrolysis (1) is coupled with its thermolysis (solid-state dehydrogenation) (2), (3):
xNH3BH3 = [NH2BH2]x + xH2↑    ~100 °C     GHD = 6.5 wt%
[NH2BH2]x = [NHBH]x + xH2↑   ~150 °C     GHD = 13 wt%
The process takes place with a high rate of hydrogen generation and with a high yield of hydrogen under the conditions when particles of the hydride wetted with a small quantity of water are heated in a reactor at a temperature of the external heating of >80 °C. The addition of a catalyst facilitates an increase in the rate of hydrogen evolution and a reduce the temperature of the reactor heating [24,25]. Thus, high values of GHD of >7 wt% have been achieved at relatively low temperatures. The effectiveness of the process is rather strongly dependent on the reactor design, the way of reactants loading into the reactor as well as on the conditions of the experiment.
Since AB is a reducer, using ex situ-reduced catalysts is not the only option in the dehydrogenation processes, but a catalytically active state of the catalysts can also be formed in situ using the compounds of active metals added in the reaction medium [26,27,28,29]. It has been found that the in situ-forming catalysts have higher activity [26,27,28]. Let us consider in more detail the use of oxides in the reactions of AB hydrolysis.
An analysis of the literature shows that copper is one of the most important components of the catalysts for AB hydrolysis [10,30]. In 2008, Kalidindi et al. [26] showed the activity of the catalysts decreases in the order Cu2O > Cu@Cu2O > Cu. It has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) that, in the course of the reaction, a reduction of Cu2O to Cu0 occurs. It was suggested by the authors that the reduction of Cu2O in the reaction medium was accelerated by the formation of hydridic Cu-H species. Later, the assumption that the ability of copper to be easily reduced in an aqueous solution of AB to form active Cu-H species was confirmed in a series of studies exploring the activity of copper-containing cobalt oxides: CuCo2O4 [31,32], Cu0.6Ni0.4Co2O4 [33], Co0.92Cu0.08Co2O4@Co0.88Cu0.12Co2O4 with a «yolk-shell» structure [34], Mo-doped Cu0.5Ni0.5Co2O4 [35]. In these studies, it was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) that the addition of copper accelerates the reduction of other metal cations comprising the complex oxide. This evidence was explained as follows: Cu2+ (0.337 V vs. SHE) are primarily reduced in the reaction medium to form Cu0 particles containing hydridic Cu-H bonds on their surface. It is these active hydridic species that promote the reduction of other cations in the oxide. This results in the formation of a multi-component active state of the catalyst immobilized on the rest of the oxide matrix, showing a synergic effect in the AB hydrolysis. Such regularities have also been observed in the case of other complex oxides: Co0.8Cu0.2MoO4 [36] and Co3O4/CuMnO4 [37]. In the latter work, the copper of the CuMnO4 accelerated the formation of a cobalt-active component from the separated crystalline phase of Co3O4 contacting with CuMnO4. As a result, the induction period characterizing the long process of reduction of Co3O4 in the reaction medium disappeared [37]. A similar synergic effect has been observed for the nanosized particles of Co3O4, whose surface was doped by copper oxide [38] and in the the CuO-NiO/Co3O4 catalytic system [39].
Unlike the studied cobaltites and molybdates, the application perspectives of Fe3O4 and ferrrites of transition metals for the AB hydrolysis have not yet been completely investigated. Traditionally, these oxides have been proposed for applications such as magnetically removable supports [40,41,42,43,44]. To prevent the active component from interacting with the support, protecting the support surface using an inert layer of a polymer or silica was proposed. It was also shown that CoFe2O4 and Fe3O4 used as supports were themselves not active in this process [43,44].
The addition of copper into these oxides and its effect on the catalytic activity in the water-employing process of AB dehydrogenation remain practically unstudied. This is, in part, explained by the fact that in an article published in 2018 [45]—a series of metal ferrites prepared by precipitation were tested in the process of AB hydrolysis, showing rather low activity which increased in the order NiFe2O4 < CuFe2O4 < ZnFe2O4 < MnFe2O4, i.e., nickel- and copper-ferrite-containing metals, usually active in the AB hydrolysis—demonstrated low activity. On the other hand, in 2016 the supported CuFe2O4/rGO (rGO is reduced graphene oxide) has been successfully used in the hydrolysis of NaBH4 [46], which is a stronger reducer than AB.
Because of the lack of sufficient information on the ferrites of copper, in 2019, we started a series of further experiments [25], which confirmed the inactivity of Fe2O3 in the water-employing processes of AB dehydrogenation (hydrolysis (1), hydrothermolysis (1)–(3)); this occurred because Fe3+ were hardly reduced by a weak reducing agent such as AB. The activity of Fe3O4 was higher, but the rate of hydrogen generation was extremely low. However, replacement of an amount of Fe2+ by Cu2+ allowed a large increase in activity both in the AB hydrolysis and AB hydrothermolysis. In AB hydrothermolysis (90 °C), the catalytic action of copper ferrite was observed both at the stage of hydrolysis and thermolysis. TEM and XRD analyses of the reaction products confirmed the reduction of copper ferrite in the reaction medium to form active nanosized particles Fe0 and Cu0. It was found that there is a relation between copper ferrite activity and its content of Fe2+. It was shown that the combustion of a glycine-nitrate precursor is an effective way to synthesize an active copper ferrite. Since its formation takes place at high temperatures and under conditions of a vigorous gas evolution limiting the access of air to the reaction zone, the structure of the forming cubic spinel has a larger content of Fe2+, which decreases when the annealing process begins [25,47].
The present paper is a continuation of these studies. The study of the release of hydrogen from solutions of different hydrides (NH3BH3, NaBH4, and NH3BH3 + NaBH4) in the presence of combustion-synthesized cobalt and copper ferrites will once more emphasize the important role of the reduction rate offered by these oxides in the reaction medium. The synergic catalytic effect of the complex mixed Cu-Fe and Co-Fe oxides and the importance of further investigations of the active iron-containing component will be demonstrated. Comparing the activities of combustion products prepared under different synthesis conditions, and having different phase compositions, will help to reveal the key characteristics of an active catalyst (the content of the cubic spinel and the content of copper in its structure as well as the presence in the sample of active copper-containing impurity).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Methods of Synthesis of the Samples under Study

The reagents and the synthesis of the mixed oxides samples are described in the Supplementary Materials. The samples (CuFe-1, CuFe-2, CuFe-3, CuFe-4, CuFe-5, and CoFe) were prepared by combustion of the glycine-nitrate precursors (Figures S1–S3 in the Supplementary Materials). For these combustion products, the values of specific surface area (SBET) were ≤7 m2⋅g−1, the M/Fe molar ratios (M=Cu,Co) were 0.43 ± 0.01 (the details see Supplementary Materials).
The Fe3O4 sample (SBET = 15 m2⋅g−1) was prepared by the traditional procedure of precipitation from FeSO4⋅7H2O and FeCl3⋅6H2O with molar ratio of Fe3+/Fe2+ = 2 as described in [25]. The XRD analysis of dried sample confirmed that the observed diffraction pattern corresponded to the structure of Fe3O4 [PDF 26-1136], the coherent scattering region (CSR) was 11 nm. The CuO sample (SBET = 49 m2⋅g−1) was prepared by annealing CuCO3⋅Cu(OH)2 at 300 °C for 4 h. The observed XRD patterns of the product fully corresponded to those of CuO [PDF 45-937]. The CSR was 10 nm. To prepare the 10 wt% CuO/Fe3O4 composite, 0.3 g of Fe3O4 and 0.0927 g of CuCO3⋅Cu(OH)2 were mixed in a mortar and annealed at 300 °C for 4 h. The SBET and CSR for Co3O4 reagent (GOST 4467-79, SoyuzKhimProm, Novosibirsk, Russia) used in this study were 16 m2/g and 60 nm, consequently.

2.2. Methods of Investigations

Attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy (ATR FTIR) was performed on an Agilent Cary 600 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) spectrometer equipped with a Gladi ATR (PIKE Technologies, Madison, WI, USA) attachment in the range 240–10,000 cm−1 without a pretreatment of the samples.
X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) was performed on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) in the range of angles 10–80° with a step 2θ = 0.05° and the time of accumulation of 5 s in each point using a Lynxeye linear detector. CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) was used. A quantitative phase analysis has been performed by the Rietveld method. The results are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. The average coherent scattering regions were determined using the Scherrer formula from the following reflections: 311 for cubic spinel (Fe3O4, M1−xFe2+xO4 M = Cu or Co), 111 for CuO, 111 for Cu, 104 for Fe2O3, 111 for Cu2O, 600 for CuFeO2, 311 for Co3O4, and 111 for CoO. The phases were identified using the following data: CuFe2O4 [PDF 25-283], CoFe2O4 [PDF 22-1686], Fe3O4 [PDF 26-1136], CuO [PDF 45-937], Cu2O [PDF 5-667], Cu [PDF 4-836], Fe2O3 [PDF 33-664], CuFeO2 [ICSD 98488], CoO [PDF 42-1300], Co (cub.) [PDF 15-0806], Co3O4 [PDF 42-1267].
The structure of the samples was studied by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) using a ThemisZ electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV and a limiting resolution of 0.07 nm. Elemental maps were obtained using energy dispersive spectrometer SuperX Thermo Fisher Scientific. Samples for research were fixed on standard aluminum grid using ultrasonic dispersion in ethanol. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained with a JEOL JSM-6460 LV (Jeol, Akishima, Japan) instrument.
The specific surface area (SBET) was determined by desorption of argon using a Sorbi-M instrument (Meta, Novosibirsk, Russia).
The Cu, Co and Fe contents were determined by atomic-emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma (ICP-AES) using Optima 4300 DV instrument (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT 06484-4794, USA).
The differential dissolution (DD) of the combustion products was performed under a flow dynamic regime using the stoichiograph equipped with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission (ICP AES) spectrometer (Baird, Zoeterwoude, Netherlands) [48]. In this method, identification of the phases is based on their different solubilities when the temperature and acidity of the solvent were changed as the process of dissolution went on in time. A powder of the combustion product (≈ 10 mg) was spread over a disposable support made from a sticky polymeric film and transferred into a flow microreactor for dissolution in a flow of solvent (at a flow rate of 3.6 mL⋅min−1). The process was started with an aqueous solution of 0.01 M HCl (Ph = 2), which was gradually replaced by 1.2 M HCl, 3 M HCl and 4 M HF (Figure S4 in the Supplementary Materials). The reactor temperature was gradually raised from 22 to 80 °C. The elemental composition of solvent was determined every 5 s from the spectral lines: 324.7 nm (Cu), 238.2 nm (Fe), and 238.8 nm (Co) with a sensitivity of 10−3 μg/mL and an error of determination of ≤5%. The kinetic dissolution curves of the elements were transformed into stoichiograms (molar ratios of the elements) (Figure S5). Mathematical processing of the obtained results allows the content and stoichiometric composition of the mixed oxide to be determined, as well as the contents of impurity phases which were obtained by subtracting the main phase of the mixed oxide from the overall curves of the dissolved elements (Figures S5 and S6) [49]. The stoichiometric formula of the mixed phase without oxygen was determined using the average values for selected segment of the stoichiogram with a standard relative deviation of less than 10% and calculated over several tens of the measured points (Figure S5).

2.3. Procedures of NH3BH3 Dehydrogenation

NH3BH3 (93%) was prepared and characterized as described in [24]. According to XRD, the average size of the CSR was 70 nm. The particle size of the hydride was within 0.2–0.4 mm. The experimental details of the AB hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis have been described in [23,24,25]. The volume of the released hydrogen was measured by the water displacement method in a gas burette. The obtained values were reduced to the N.T.P. and expressed in mole equivalents of the hydrogen released from one mole of NH3BH3.
The AB hydrolysis was carried out at 40 and 60 °C under stirring. First, 10 mL of distilled water was added into a glass reactor (V = 52.5 mL) preheated to the required temperature; then, AB (38 mg) and the catalyst powder (11.7 mg) were quickly added in succession. The evolving hydrogen was passed through a condenser to the gas burette (100 mL). To establish the effect of the reducing power of the hydride on the rate of activation of the catalyst in the reaction medium and hydrogen evolution, in similar hydrolysis experiments, NH3BH3 was replaced by NaBH4 (46.5 mg) and by NH3BH3 (32.4 mg) with a small content of NaBH4 (6.8 mg).
In the hydrothermolysis experiments, a mechanical mixture of 46 mg of NH3BH3 and 5.2 mg of the oxide powder (10 wt%) was loaded into a glass reactor (V = 32 mL) to which distilled water was then added in drops using a micropipette (54 μL) until a molar ratio of H2O/AB = 2 was achieved. The sealed reactor was immersed into an oil bath preheated to 90 ± 1 °C. In the course of the experiments, the temperature inside the reaction layer and the volume of the evolving hydrogen were measured. Before going to the gas burette, the evolved hydrogen was passed through a trap filled with a 5% solution of CuSO4.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Comparison of the Activities of Cobalt, Copper and Iron Oxides in NH3BH3 Thermolysis and Hydrothermolysis

To confirm the promoting action of copper on the reduction of iron in the reaction media of AB hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis, ferrites of copper (CuFe-1) and cobalt (CoFe) have been prepared by combustion of glycine-nitrate precursors (Figures S1 and S3 in the Supplementary Materials) and characterized by ATR FTIR, XRD, DD and SEM. The micrographs (Figure 1) of the obtained combustion products indicated that they have close sizes of their particles and for the most part consist of micro-porous particles with a size smaller than 100 μm. The SBET for CuFe-1 and CoFe was also the same (4 m2/g).
In Table 1, the results of the XRD phase analysis are compared with those obtained by DD. Note that, when using XRD, it is more difficult to distinguish between the cubic spinel of Fe3O4 and those of Cu1−xFe2+xO4 and Co1-xFe2+xO4 because of the close parameters of their crystalline structures. The advantages of the combined use of XRD and DD have been demonstrated earlier [25], where DD was used to determine the stoichiometry and content of the main phase of the cubic spinel. The contents of the impurity phases were calculated, as were the rest of the remaining substances, after subtraction of the main phase from the overall dissolution curves of the determined elements.
Using the results obtained by XRD (Table 1) and DD (Figures S5–S7), it is demonstrated that the main phase of the combustion products is a spinel with a cubic structure (Cu0.67Fe2.33O4 or Co0.90Fe2.10O4). Apart from the main phase of the cubic spinel, these methods also reveal the presence of other phases of copper, cobalt and iron. Cobalt ferrite has smaller contents of such impurity phases and, hence, more cobalt is found in the structure of the spinel. We believe this to be associated with the fact that, under the conditions of the vigorous combustion and a limited access of air to the reaction zone, Co2+ is less capable of being reduced, which allows it to enter the spinel lattice.
The ATR FTIR spectra in the region of metal-oxygen vibrations are shown in Figure 2a. As in the spectrum of Fe3O4, the spectra of CuFe-1 and CoFe clearly reveal the presence of two intense absorption bands at 700–500 cm−1 and 470–260 cm−1, which were to the vibrations of iron in the tetrahedral [FeO4] and octahedral [FeO6] environments, respectively [50,51]. In the case of ferrites, the shifts in the centers of gravity of these bands are associated with the influence of the copper or cobalt cations on the vibrations of iron, as well as with the possible reduction of the spinel cations leading to the change of the Fe-O bonds [52]. These changes are most characteristic of the vibrations of [FeO6]. A more detailed analysis of Fe-containing spinel spectra was given in our previous paper [25].
The higher content of cobalt in the cobalt ferrite as compared with the content of copper in the copper ferrite suggests that there will be a low content of Fe2+ in the structure of the cobalt-containing spinel. This suggestion is confirmed by the ATR FTIR spectra in the near-IR region (Figure 2b). It is known that the absorption in this region characterizes the electronic conductivity in Fe3O4 due to the constant exchange of electrons between Fe2+ and Fe3+ in the closely lying octahedral positions [53]. The lower level of absorption in the case of CoFe sample confirms the greater extent of the Fe2+ replacement by Co2+ in this spinel.
As seen in the results shown in Figure 3, in the case of copper and cobalt ferrites, the rates of hydrogen generation are higher than in the case of individual oxides. Note that CuO, Co3O4, and Fe3O4 have higher specific surface areas than CuFe-1 and CoFe. On the contrary, this should improve their interaction with the reaction medium. Considering the low activity of Fe3O4, higher rates of hydrogen generation in the presence of ferrites are achieved at lower contents of copper or cobalt in the reaction medium than in the case of the oxides of these metals. This indicates a synergic action of the metals comprising the spinel. It should also be noted that the curves of hydrogen generation in the presence of the studied compounds of cobalt show the presence of an induction period (Figure 3). Earlier, when studying the Co3O4-catalyzed hydrolysis of NaBH4 and NH3BH3, the presence of the induction period has been explained by the slow reduction of cobalt oxide in the reaction medium to form active nanosize cobalt borides [29]. The absence of an induction period in the case of the copper-containing oxides indicates a faster activation of the catalyst in the reaction medium.
The activation behavior of the ferrites of copper and cobalt in the process of AB hydrolysis (Figure 3) repeats itself in the stage of hydrolysis in another process—AB hydrothermolysis (Figure 4). We believe that the shorter induction period in the case of CoFe is associated with the higher temperatures of the reactor heating used in this process and the higher concentration of the hydride in the reaction medium. As expected, this confirms the earlier-established correlation between the rate of the AB hydrolysis stage and the time during which the process proceeds to the next stage of the AB thermolysis [23,24,25]. The catalytic systems which were more active in the AB hydrolysis are characterized by faster rates of hydrogen generation and higher yields of hydrogen in the first exothermic stage of AB hydrolysis, which provides a faster transition from the stage of hydrolysis to the stage of thermolysis (Figure 4).
The important role of the stage of oxide reduction has been demonstrated in experiments, where CuFe-1 and CoFe samples have been tested in the hydrolysis of NH3BH3, NaBH4 and NH3BH3 with a small content of NaBH4 (Figure 5). These experiments were carried out at a lower temperature (40 °C) in order to lengthen the time of the induction period.
Ammonia borane is known to be a considerably weaker reducer than sodium borohydride [14,29]. The addition of ammonia borane to a small amount of NaBH4 enhances the formation of the active component in the reaction medium [29,54] It is seen (Figure 5) that the most remarkable changes were in the case of cobalt ferrite where the stronger reducing power of the reaction medium resulted in an almost ten times shorter induction period in the hydrogen generation curve. The highest rate of hydrogen generation was in the case of the solution of NaBH4. In moving from NH3BH3 to NH3BH3 + NaBH4 and NaBH4 solutions, the time of the reaction in the presence of CoFe was reduced from 32 min to 23 min and 11 min, respectively. The changes in the case of CuFe-1 were less pronounced (Figure 5). The time of the reaction shortened from 13 min (NH3BH3) to 12 min (NH3BH3 + NaBH4) and 8.5 min (NaBH4). Overall, these results show that the product of combustion consisting predominantly of the copper-doped cubic spinel Cu0.67Fe2.33O4 shows considerable advantages over the Co0.90Fe2.10O4. Based on our results and the results reported in the literature such a behavior may, in the first place, be explained by the ability of copper ferrite to reduce in the reaction medium to form a catalytically active phase consisting of nanosized Fe0 and Cu0. The results of the above-made comparison of the activities of cobalt and copper ferrites once more confirm the assumption reported in the literature that the reduction of iron in the oxide structure is accelerated by the forming Cu-H species which have a high hydrogenation power [10]. It allows us to suggest that the formation of the hydridic Cu-H species is of importance not only during the stage of catalyst activation but also in the subsequent stage of the active generation of hydrogen because they slow down the oxidation of the nanosized active component in the aqueous reaction medium.
In the next section, the activity in the processes of AB hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis will be compared for combustion products which were synthesized under different conditions. As a result, the formed combustion products differed in the dispersity, the content of the cubic spinel, the content of Cu in the spinel structure and the content of the impurities. Analysis of these results allowed us to obtain more detailed characteristics of the active catalytic additive.

3.2. Effect of the Phase Composition of Products of Combustion of Copper-Iron-Glycine-Nitrate Precursors on Their Activity in NH3BH3 Hydrolysis and Hydrothermolysis

As can be seen from Table 2, the prepared products of combustion of copper-iron-glycine-nitrate precursors differ in the content of the cubic spinel, CSR and the content and composition of impurities. For all samples, the Cu/Fe molar ratios determined by ICP-AES were close 0.43 ± 0.01.
The results presented in Figure 6, Figure 7 show that the method of preparation and the characteristics of the combustion products determine their activity in the AB hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis. As expected, the behavior in the AB hydrolysis (Figure 6) repeats itself in the case of AB hydrothermolysis (Figure 7). To find out the most significant parameters of the combustion products, consisting not only of the phase of the cubic spinel but also contain other phases (Table 2), let us first consider the correlation between the product’s activity and its characteristics for two of the studied combustion products: the most active sample, CuFe-1, and the least active sample, CuFe-5.
Let us start with the size of the particles. The SEM analysis (Figure S9) has shown the particles of the little active CuFe-5 sample were the most sintered ones. This is also confirmed by the highest value of CSR for the phase of the cubic spinel (Table 2). Apart from its small dispersity, the least active sample CuFe-5 shows the lowest content of the cubic spinel (34%), the highest content of Fe2O3 (40%) and a high content of copper in the form of individual phases (Cu0 + Cu2O). As we showed earlier [47], the formation the mixed copper-iron oxide phase in the case of this sample is complicated not only by the short time available for the components to interact in the reaction zone but also by the high temperatures in the reaction zone and the reduction of copper under the conditions of the vigorous gas evolution which decreases the content of oxygen in the reaction zone. This causes the copper to leave the structure of the spinel [55,56].
The phase of the cubic spinel found by XRD is attributable both to the small amount of active Fe3O4 and the active copper ferrite Cu1−xFe2+xO4 [25]. In the compared samples, HRTEM and DD were used to assess the presence of the mixed copper-iron oxide phase and determine the spinel content and its stoichiometry. Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the results of the HRTEM analysis for the little-active CuFe-5 and the active CuFe-1.
As shown in Figure 8, the particles of the little-active CuFe-5 mainly consist of individual phases of iron and copper. Nanosized spherical particles also occur (Figure 8f,g) and are attributed to Cu2O (PDF 5-667). Regions of mixed oxides containing both copper and iron are rare. The concentration of copper in the particles of iron oxide is generally low. It can, therefore, be suggested that, in the CuFe-5 sample, the cubic spinel (34%) is mainly Fe3O4 or a slightly Cu-doped Fe3O4. Additionally, the high-resolution micrographs of this sample indicate the presence of large number of moiré patterns (Figure 8g), which is a consequence of the superposition of periodic layered structures with either slightly different lattice constants or different orientation. Amorphous regions also occur (Figure 8h).
The TEM results for the active CuFe-1 are quite different (Figure 9). All particles of this sample contain both copper and iron, which confirms that the main phase of the cubic spinel (84%) is a mixed copper-iron oxide. It is seen that the stoichiometry Cu/Fe within a single particle is not constant (Figure 9d–h). Regions with a higher and a lower content of copper (or iron) occur. We believe that these regions are the sites of localization of individual phases of copper and iron and of the CuFeO2 phase which has a higher Cu/Fe ratio than CuFe2O4. In the HRTEM images, the moiré patterns are practically not observed (Figure 9i,j), which appears to indicate a greater phase homogeneity of this sample. This is consistent with the XRD data (Table 2).
Thus, the comparison of the two products of combustion (CuFe-1 and CuFe-5) allows us to conclude that the active CuFe-1 product predominantly consist of more finely dispersed particles of copper ferrite with average stoichiometry of Cu0.67Fe2.33O4 and the presence of a number of other phases of copper and iron as an impurity. To answer the question, ‘how important are the contents of the cubic spinel, the copper content in the spinel structure and the presence of other compounds of copper and iron for the catalytic activity?’, the results of XRD analysis obtained for a number of combustion products prepared under different synthesis conditions (Table 2) have been correlated with their activity in the AB hydrolysis (Figure 6).
The following series were obtained:
  • The rate of H2 generation in the presence of CuFe combustion products (Table 2) in the catalytic AB hydrolysis decreases in the order (Figure 6):
    CuFe-1 ≈ CuFe-2 > CuFe-3 > CuFe-4>CuFe-5;
  • The content of the spinel phase in wt% decreases in the order:
    CuFe-1 (84%) > CuFe-2 (73%) > CuFe-3 (66%) > CuFe-4 (48%) > CuFe-5 (34%);
  • CSR of the spinel phase in nm increases in the order:
    CuFe-2 (49 nm) < CuFe-3 (52 nm) < CuFe-1 (62 nm) ≈ CuFe-4 (62 nm) < CuFe-5 (77 nm);
  • The content of the oxide phases of copper (CuO+Cu2O+CuFeO2) expressed in wt% of Cu decreases in the order:
    CuFe-2 (9.6%) > CuFe-1 (7.9%) ≈ CuFe-4 (7.4%) ≈ CuFe-3 (7.3%) > CuFe-5 (6.2%);
  • The content of the CuO phase in wt% decreases in the order:
    CuFe-2 (12%) > CuFe-3 (6%) > CuFe-1 (3%) > CuFe-4 ≈ CuFe-5 (0%);
  • The content of the Cu2O phase in wt% increases in the order:
    CuFe-1 ≈ CuFe-2 ≈ CuFe-3 (0%) < CuFe-4 (6%) ≈ CuFe-5 (7%);
  • The content of the CuFeO2 in wt% decreases in the order:
    CuFe-1 (13%) > CuFe-3 (6%) ≈ CuFe-4 (5%) > CuFe-2 ≈ CuFe-5 (0%);
  • The content of the Cu0 phase (CSR > 150 nm) in wt% increases in the order:
    CuFe-1 (0%) < CuFe-2 (6%) < CuFe-3 (14%) ≈ CuFe-4 (15%) < CuFe-5 (18%);
  • The content of all impurity phases of copper (all of the oxide phases of copper + Cu0) expressed in wt% of Cu increases in the order:
    CuFe-1 (7.9%) < CuFe-2 (15.6%) < CuFe-3 (21.3%) ≈ CuFe-4 (22.4%) < CuFe-5 (24.2%);
  • The content of the Fe2O3 phase in wt% increases in the order:
    CuFe-1 (0%) < CuFe-3 (8%) ≈ CuFe-2 (9%) < CuFe-4 (26%) < CuFe-5 (40%).
The comparison of these results allows us to obtain more detailed information concerning the composition of the active catalyst. Note that activity is not explained by the dispersity (CSR, SBET) of these samples. It was shown that the activity of the studied combustion products (4) correlates with their content of the cubic spinel (5). The higher the content of the cubic spinel, the higher the activity. The activity of the studied combustion products tends to decrease with the increasing fraction of the impurity phases of copper (CuO + Cu2O + CuFeO2 + Cu0) (12) and the increasing content of the inactive phase Fe2O3 (13). This explains the high activity of CuFe-1, which mainly consists of the cubic spinel (83%) with a relatively large extent of the Fe2+ substitution by Cu2+ (Cu/Fe = 0.29 in moles).
On the other hand, from the results of the present study, it follows that the high content of copper in the lattice of the cubic spinel is not an indispensable condition for a high catalytic activity. In contrast to CuFe-1, the spinels of the other products are characterized by rather low theoretical molar ratios Cu/Fe < 0.1, since a considerable portion of copper in these samples is present in the form of individual compounds (Table 2). This is especially characteristic of CuFe-2 sample, whose activity in the AB hydrolysis (Figure 6) is comparable to that of CuFe-1 at an XRD derived content of the cubic spinel of 73%. A DD analysis of this sample (Table 3) confirmed the XRD results and allowed us to obtain more exact values of the Cu/Fe molar ratio in the spinel of this sample. It was found to be 0.06 which corresponds to the Cu0.16Fe2.84O4 composition.
Further correlation between the order of activities of CuFe-samples (4) and their contents of CuO (8), Cu2O (9), CuFeO2 (10), and Cu0 (11) phases allowed us to make the following conclusions. The active samples CuFe-1, CuFe-2 and CuFe-3 do not contain Cu2O. The high activity cannot also be related to the presence of coarsely dispersed metallic copper. On the contrary, it is the low-active samples CuFe-4 and CuFe-5 that contain a considerable amount of reduced copper (15–18 wt%) (11), a high content of Fe2O3 (13), a low content of the spinel (5) and a Cu2O impurity (9). According to XRD, the value of CSR of Cu0 formed upon the combustion is >150 nm (Table 2), which substantially exceeds the CSR of the active copper forming from the oxides in the reaction medium of ammonia borane (≤40 nm) [25]; this seems to be responsible for the low activity of such samples. There is no correlation between the activity and the presence of the CuFeO2 phase. For example, this phase is not present in the active CuFe-2 but is found in the low-activity CuFe-4 and in the active CuFe-1.
In our opinion, the high activity of CuFe-2 comparable to that of CuFe-1 may be related to its high content of CuO (12%) (Table 2, (8)). The CuO phase is also found in the most active sample CuFe-1 (3%) and in the sample CuFe-3 (6%)—the next member in the order of activities. The least active samples CuFe-4 and CuFe-5 do not contain CuO.
This allowed us to suggest that the active combustion product may not only show a relatively high extent of Fe2+ substitution by Cu2+ in spinel structure but also it may predominantly consist of Fe3O4 (including with the presence in its structure of a small content of copper) together with an amount of the active CuO phase. We believe that as in the case of mixed Cu-Fe oxide phase, the reduction of CuO at the CuO–Fe3O4 interface to form active Cu-H sites must lead to the reduction of iron in the structure of Fe3O4. A similar effect has been described for the systems CuO/Co3O4 [38] and CuO-NiO/Co3O4 [39], which are being investigated for use in AB hydrolysis. No such evidence has been reported for Fe3O4. It should be noted that the potential of active iron-containing components in the catalytic processes discussed in this study is still little studied. However, there have been some reported results dealing with the promoting action of iron on active nickel and cobalt-active components [8,10,57,58,59,60].
To verify this assumption, in an experiment an amount of Fe3O4 was ground with a basic carbonate of copper and the mixture was calcined in air at 300 °C for 4 h to produce a 10 wt% CuO/Fe3O4. We were aware that this method of preparation is not the most optimal and efficient, since a mere calcination of such a mixture cannot ensure the formation of the active nano-dispersed states of CuO and, in addition, there a partial oxidation of Fe3O4 to γ-Fe2O3 will take place; the latter is less active than Fe3O4 [25]. However, it was a fast way to verify our assumptions. Indeed, the data in Figure 10 show that Fe3O4 modification by a small amount of CuO facilitates a considerable increase in its activity. The observed activity of 10 wt% CuO/Fe3O4 exceeds that of the analogously prepared bulk CuO. These results may help to find new approaches to the creation of novel Fe3O4-based active materials for water-employed AB dehydrogenation.

4. Conclusions

The catalytic activity of Fe3O4 in the reactions of ammonia borane hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis has been compared with the activity of copper and cobalt ferrites with the structure of a cubic spinel prepared by combustion of glycine-nitrate precursors. In the process of AB hydrothermolysis, a highly exothermic reaction of AB hydrolysis is coupled with the subsequent stage of AB thermolysis. Note that, with this process, high values of GHD (>7 wt%) can be achieved at relatively low temperatures of the external heating (>80 °C) [20,21,23,24,25].
The rate of hydrogen generation was found to change in the order
Cu0.67Fe2.33O4 > Co0.90Fe2.10O4 > Co3O4 > CuO > Fe3O4. This order was not explained by the dispersity of studied samples, but depended on their chemical composition. The obtained results indicated a synergic action of the metals comprising the spinel. The advantages of using copper ferrite are not only its high activity in the AB hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis, but also the absence of an induction period in the curves of hydrogen generation which is associated with its fast reduction in the reaction medium to form active nanodispersed Fe0 and Cu0 [25]. A comparison of the results for the activity of copper and cobalt ferrites in reaction media having different reducing powers (solutions of NH3BH3, NH3BH3+NaBH4 and NaBH4) confirmed the easier reduction of the copper-containing oxide. It has been suggested [10] that this happens because of the easier reduction of copper in the hydride medium to produce hydridic Cu-H species accelerating reduction of other metals in the oxide structure. The activating action of the compounds of copper, including its oxides, is well known and has been employed in the processes of hydrogenation of different organic substrates where ammonia borane is used as a mild reducer [61,62,63].
The obtained results allow us to suggest that the formation of the active hydridic Cu-H species is of importance not only for the initial stage of activation, but also for the later stage of the active generation of hydrogen, preventing the oxidation of the active, nanosized component in the aqueous medium.
To reveal the most significant parameters of the active catalytic system on the basis of copper-containing spinel, the activity of a series of combustion products which differed in the their dispersity has been analyzed: the contents of the cubic spinel, the content of copper in spinel structure and the content and composition of impurity phases. Based on the obtained results, it was suggested that the catalyst may be active not only when a portion of Fe2+ in cubic spinel structure is replaced by Cu2+, but also when it consists of Fe3O4 with an amount of CuO.
Thus, the obtained results show the high potential of the copper-modified Fe3O4 as a precursor, allowing the active catalytic states to be formed directly in the reaction medium. We believe that such catalytic systems may be improved further by replacing a portion of Fe2+ cations in the spinel structure by active cations (Ni2+, Co2+, etc.) together with Cu2+ or by preparation of finely dispersed multi-phase oxide systems, involving oxide of copper.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma14185422/s1: Section: the preparation procedures of combustion products; Figure S1: the combustion synthesis of CuFe-1 and CuFe-5 samples as the process went on in time; Figure S2: the combustion synthesis of CuFe-2, CuFe-3 and CuFe-4 samples as the process went on in time; Figure S3: the combustion synthesis of CoFe sample as the process went on in time; Figure S4: typical kinetic curves of concentration of measured elements and changes of temperature and acidity of solvent on the time of sample dissolution in flow regime of DD experiment; Figure S5: kinetic curves of concentration of cobalt and iron and calculated Co/Fe molar ratio on the time of dissolution of CoFe sample; Figure S6: dynamics of dissolution of isolated phase of copper ferrite (Co0.90Fe2.10O4) and remaining phases of cobalt (oxide, metal) and iron (presumably Fe2O3); Figure S7: (a) kinetic curves of concentration of copper and iron and calculated Cu/Fe molar ratio, (b) dynamics of dissolution of isolated phase of copper ferrite (Cu0.67Fe2.33O4) and remaining phases of cupper (oxides, metal) and iron (presumably Fe2O3) during dissolution of CuFe-1 sample; Figure S8: (a) kinetic curves of concentration of copper and iron and calculated Cu/Fe molar ratio, (b) dynamics of dissolution of isolated phase of copper ferrite (Cu0.16Fe2.84O4) and remaining phases of copper (oxides, metal) and iron (presumably Fe2O3) during dissolution of CuFe-2 sample; Figure S9: SEM images for CuFe-1, CuFe-3 и CuFe-5 combustion products (Table 2).

Author Contributions

Writing—review and editing, O.V.K.; conceptualization, V.I.S. and O.V.K.; methodology, V.I.S.; data curation, A.M.O. and E.S.T.; investigation, A.A.P., O.A.B., A.V.I., G.V.O., A.M.G., I.L.L., and S.A.M.; visualization, E.S.T. and A.V.I.; formal analysis, S.A.M. and I.L.L.; validation, A.A.P., O.A.B. and G.V.O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.O., A.M.G. and O.V.N.; project administration, O.V.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the governmental order for Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, project AAAA-A21-121011390006-0.

Acknowledgments

Authors are very gratefully to N.A. Rudina for the study the samples by the scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Staubitz, A.; Robertson, A.P.M.; Manners, I. Ammonia-Borane and related compounds as dihydrogen sources. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4079–4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peng, B.; Chen, J. Ammonia borane as an efficient and lightweight hydrogen storage medium. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2008, 1, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, H.; Yang, Q.; Chen, X.; Shore, S.G. Ammonia borane, past as prolog. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 751, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Demirci, U.B. Ammonia borane, a material with exceptional properties for chemical hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2017, 42, 9978–10013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Demirci, U.B. Ammonia borane: An extensively studied, though not yet implemented, hydrogen carrier. Energies 2020, 13, 3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, Z.; Autrey, T. Boron-nitrogen-hydrogen (BNH) compounds: Recent developments in hydrogen storage, applications in hydrogenation and catalysis, and new syntheses. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9257–9268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kumar, R.; Karkamkar, A.; Bowden, M.; Autrey, T. Solid-state hydrogen rich boron-nitrogen compounds for energy storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 5350–5380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yüksel Alpaydın, C.; Gülbay, S.K.; Ozgur Colpan, C. A review on the catalysts used for hydrogen production from ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2020, 45, 3414–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, H.; Cheng, Y.; Fan, Y.; Lu, X.; Li, L.; Liu, B.; Li, B.; Lu, S. Metal-catalyzed hydrolysis of ammonia borane: Mechanism, catalysts, and challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy 2020, 45, 30325–30340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C.; Zhao, J.; Du, X.; Sun, S.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Z.; Li, L.; Yang, X. Hydrogen production from ammonia borane hydrolysis catalyzed by non-noble metal-based materials: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 2856–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeong, J.; Bhosale, V.K.; Kwon, S. Ultrafast igniting, low toxicity hypergolic hybrid solid fuels and hydrogen peroxide oxidizer. Fuel 2021, 286, 119307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gong, A.; Verstraete, D. Fuel cell propulsion in small fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles: Current status and research needs. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2017, 42, 21311–21333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Faverio, C.; Boselli, M.F.; Medici, F.; Benaglia, M. Ammonia borane as a reducing agent in organic synthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 7789–7813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kalidindi, S.B.; Sanyal, U.; Jagirdar, B.R. Chemical synthesis of metal nanoparticles using amine-boranes. Chem. Sus. Chem. 2011, 4, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jiang, H.L.; Akita, T.; Xu, Q. A one-pot protocol for synthesis of non-noble metal-based core-shell nanoparticles under ambient conditions: Toward highly active and cost-effective catalysts for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of NH3BH3. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10999–11001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kostka, J.F.; Schellenberg, R.; Baitalow, F.; Smolinka, T.; Mertens, F. Concentration-dependent dehydrogenation of ammonia-borane/triglyme mixtures. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 2012, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sonnenberg, J.F.; Morris, R.H. Evidence for iron nanoparticles catalyzing the rapid dehydrogenation of ammonia-borane. ACS. Catal. 2013, 3, 1092–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yao, Q.; DIng, Y.; Lu, Z.H. Noble-metal-free nanocatalysts for hydrogen generation from boron- and nitrogen-based hydrides. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 3837–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Ren, X.; Lv, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, B. Highly efficient hydrogen production from hydrolysis of ammonia borane over nanostructured Cu@CuCoOx supported on graphene oxide. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diwan, M.; Hwang, H.T.; Al-Kukhun, A.; Varma, A. Hydrogen generation from noncatalytic hydrothermolysis of ammonia borane for vehicle applications. AIChE J. 2011, 57, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hwang, H.T.; Al-Kukhun, A.; Varma, A. Hydrogen for vehicle applications from hydrothermolysis of ammonia borane: Hydrogen yield, thermal characteristics, and ammonia formation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 10994–11000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Akins, D.L.; Lee, J.W. Calorimetric and microscopic studies on the noncatalytic hydrothermolysis of ammonia borane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 10407–10413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Komova, O.V.; Kayl, N.L.; Odegova, G.V.; Netskina, O.V.; Simagina, V.I. Destabilization of NH3BH3 by water during hydrothermolysis as a key factor in the high hydrogen evolution rates. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2016, 41, 17484–17495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gorlova, A.M.; Kayl, N.L.; Komova, O.V.; Netskina, O.V.; Ozerova, A.M.; Odegova, G.V.; Bulavchenko, O.A.; Ishchenko, A.V.; Simagina, V.I. Fast hydrogen generation from solid NH3BH3 under moderate heating and supplying a limited quantity of CoCl2 or NiCl2 solution. Renew. Energy. 2018, 121, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Komova, O.V.; Odegova, G.V.; Gorlova, A.M.; Bulavchenko, O.A.; Pochtar, A.A.; Netskina, O.V.; Simagina, V.I. Copper–iron mixed oxide catalyst precursors prepared by glycine-nitrate combustion method for ammonia borane dehydrogenation processes. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2019, 44, 24277–24291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalidindi, S.B.; Sanyal, U.; Jagirdar, B.R. Nanostructured Cu and Cu@Cu2O core shell catalysts for hydrogen generation from ammonia-borane. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 5870–5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yan, J.M.; Zhang, X.B.; Han, S.; Shioyama, H.; Xu, Q. Iron-nanoparticle-catalyzed hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane for chemical hydrogen storage. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2287–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cavaliere, S.; Hannauer, J.; Demirci, U.B.; Akdim, O.; Miele, P. Ex situ characterization of N2H4-, NaBH4- and NH3BH3-reduced cobalt catalysts used in NaBH4 hydrolysis. Catal. Today. 2011, 170, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Simagina, V.I.; Komova, O.V.; Ozerova, A.M.; Netskina, O.V.; Odegova, G.V.; Kellerman, D.G.; Bulavchenko, O.A.; Ishchenko, A.V. Cobalt oxide catalyst for hydrolysis of sodium borohydride and ammonia borane. Appl. Catal. A. Gen. 2011, 394, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, Y.W.; Lu, Z.H.; Chen, X.S. Cu-based nanocatalysts for hydrogen generation via hydrolysis and methanolysis of ammonia borane. Mater. Technol. 2015, 30, A89–A93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Liao, J.; Feng, K.; Zheng, Y.; Pollet, B.G.; Li, H. CuCo2O4 nanoplate film as a low-cost, highly active and durable catalyst towards the hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane for hydrogen production. J. Power. Sources. 2017, 355, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liao, J.; Feng, Y.; Wu, S.; Ye, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Xie, F.; Li, H. Hexagonal CuCo2O4 nanoplatelets, a highly active catalyst for the hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen production. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lu, D.; Liao, J.; Zhong, S.; Leng, Y.; Ji, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.; Li, H. Cu0.6Ni0.4Co2O4 nanowires, a novel noble-metal-free catalyst with ultrahigh catalytic activity towards the hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2018, 43, 5541–5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, D.; Li, J.; Lin, C.; Liao, J.; Feng, Y.; Ding, Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q.; Li, H. A simple and scalable route to synthesize CoxCu1−xCo2O4@CoyCu1−yCo2O4 yolk–shell microspheres, a high-performance catalyst to hydrolyze ammonia borane for hydrogen production. Small 2019, 15, 1805460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lu, D.; Liao, J.; Leng, Y.; Zhong, S.; He, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.; Li, H. Mo-doped Cu0.5Ni0.5Co2O4 nanowires, a strong substitute for noble-metal-based catalysts towards the hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen production. Catal. Commun. 2018, 114, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liao, J.; Lu, D.; Diao, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, M.; Li, H. Co0.8Cu0.2MoO4 microspheres composed of nanoplatelets as a robust catalyst for the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5843–5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, D.; Liao, J.; Li, H.; Ji, S.; Pollet, B.G. Co3O4/CuMoO4 hybrid microflowers composed of nanorods with rich particle boundaries as a highly active catalyst for ammonia borane hydrolysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 16474–16482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yamada, Y.; Yano, K.; Xu, Q.; Fukuzumi, S. Cu/Co3O4 nanoparticles as catalysts for hydrogen evolution from ammonia borane by hydrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 16456–16462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liao, J.; Feng, Y.; Lin, W.; Su, X.; Ji, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, W.; Pollet, B.G.; Li, H. CuO–NiO/Co3O4 hybrid nanoplates as highly active catalyst for ammonia borane hydrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 8168–8176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Özkar, S. Magnetically separable transition metal nanoparticles as catalysts in hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2021, 46, 21383–21400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaya, M.; Zahmakiran, M.; Özkar, S.; Volkan, M. Copper(0) nanoparticles supported on silica-coated cobalt ferrite magnetic particles: Cost effective catalyst in the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane with an exceptional reusability performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2012, 4, 3866–3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liang, Z.; Li, Q.; Li, F.; Zhao, S.; Xia, X. Hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of NaBH4 based on high stable NiB/NiFe2O4 catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2017, 42, 3971–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Manna, J.; Akbayrak, S.; Özkar, S. Nickel(0) nanoparticles supported on bare or coated cobalt ferrite as highly active, magnetically isolable and reusable catalyst for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2017, 508, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Manna, J.; Akbayrak, S.; Özkar, S. Palladium(0) nanoparticles supported on polydopamine coated CoFe2O4 as highly active, magnetically isolable and reusable catalyst for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 208, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abd El-Hafiz, D.R.; Eshaq, G.; ElMetwally, A.E. Recent enhancement of ammonia borane hydrolysis using spinel-type metal ferrites nano-catalysts. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 217, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tang, M.; Xia, F.; Gao, C.; Qiu, H. Preparation of magnetically recyclable CuFe2O4/RGO for catalytic hydrolysis of sodium borohydride. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2016, 41, 13058–13068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Simagina, V.I.; Komova, O.V.; Odegova, G.V.; Netskina, O.V.; Bulavchenko, O.A.; Pochtar’, A.A.; Kayl, N.L. Study of copper-iron mixed oxide with cubic spinel structure, synthesized by the combustion method. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2019, 92, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Malakhov, V.V.; Vasilyeva, I.G. Stoichiography and chemical methods of phase analysis of multielement multiphase compounds and materials. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2008, 77, 370–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pochtar’, A.A.; Malakhov, V.V. New stoichiographic methods for assessing spatial inhomogeneities in the composition and structure of solid substances and materials. Inorg. Mater. 2018, 54, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Silva, M.D.P.; Silva, F.C.; Sinfrônio, F.S.M.; Paschoal, A.R.; Silva, E.N.; Paschoal, C.W.A. The effect of cobalt substitution in crystal structure and vibrational modes of CuFe2O4 powders obtained by polymeric precursor method. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 584, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ishii, M.; Nakahira, M.; Yamanaka, T. Infrared absorption spectra and cation distributions in (Mn, Fe)3O4. Solid. State. Commun. 1972, 11, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ristić, M.; Hannoyer, B.; Popović, S.; Musić, S.; Bajraktaraj, N. Ferritization of copper ions in the Cu-Fe-O system. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2000, 77, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, K.J.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H. Magneto-optical investigation of spinel ferrite CuFe2O4: Observation of Jahn-Teller effect in Cu2+ ion. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004, 279, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kantürk Figen, A.; Taşçi, K.; Coşkuner Filiz, B. Synergetic effect of sodium borohydride addition in ammonia borane hydrolysis reaction mechanism and kinetics. Kinet. Catal. 2018, 59, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Estrella, M.; Barrio, L.; Zhou, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Wen, W.; Hanson, J.C.; Frenkel, A.I.; Rodriguez, J.A. In situ characterization of CuFe2O4 and Cu/Fe3O4 water-gas shift catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 14411–14417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kang, K.S.; Kim, C.H.; Cho, W.C.; Bae, K.K.; Woo, S.W.; Park, C.S. Reduction characteristics of CuFe2O4 and Fe3O4 by methane; CuFe2O4 as an oxidant for two-step thermochemical methane reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2008, 33, 4560–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, Z.H.; Li, J.; Zhu, A.; Yao, Q.; Huang, W.; Zhou, R.; Zhou, R.; Chen, X. Catalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane via magnetically recyclable copper iron nanoparticles for chemical hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2013, 38, 5330–5337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yan, J.M.; Zhang, X.B.; Han, S.; Shioyama, H.; Xu, Q. Magnetically recyclable Fe-Ni alloy catalyzed dehydrogenation of ammonia borane in aqueous solution under ambient atmosphere. J. Power. Sources. 2009, 194, 478–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, H.L.; Yan, J.M.; Wang, Z.L.; Jiang, Q. One-step synthesis of Cu@FeNi core-shell nanoparticles: Highly active catalyst for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2012, 37, 10229–10235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qiu, F.; Dai, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, C.; Huang, Y.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, L.; Yuan, H. Synthesis of Cu@FeCo core–shell nanoparticles for the catalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2014, 39, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Du, J.; Chen, J.; Xia, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Zhou, W.; Wang, B. Commercially available CuO catalyzed hydrogenation of nitroarenes using ammonia borane as a hydrogen source. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2020, 12, 2426–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Du, J.; Hou, J.; Li, B.; Qin, R.; Xu, C.; Liu, H. Support-free 3D hierarchical nanoporous Cu@Cu2O for fast tandem ammonia borane dehydrogenation and nitroarenes hydrogenation under mild conditions. J. Alloys. Compd. 2020, 815, 152372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhou, Y.H.; Yang, Q.; Chen, Y.Z.; Jiang, H.L. Low-cost CuNi@MIL-101 as an excellent catalyst toward cascade reaction: Integration of ammonia borane dehydrogenation with nitroarene hydrogenation. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 12361–12364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The SEM images of (a,b) copper ferrite (CuFe-1) and (c,d) cobalt ferrite (CoFe) prepared by combustion method.
Figure 1. The SEM images of (a,b) copper ferrite (CuFe-1) and (c,d) cobalt ferrite (CoFe) prepared by combustion method.
Materials 14 05422 g001
Figure 2. The spectra of Fe3O4, copper ferrite (CuFe-1) and cobalt ferrite (CoFe) in the region of vibrations of metal–oxygen bonds (a) and in the near-infrared region (b).
Figure 2. The spectra of Fe3O4, copper ferrite (CuFe-1) and cobalt ferrite (CoFe) in the region of vibrations of metal–oxygen bonds (a) and in the near-infrared region (b).
Materials 14 05422 g002
Figure 3. The influence of oxides on the hydrogen generation during catalytic hydrolysis of NH3BH3 (0.123 M) at 60 °C. The numbers indicate the attainable rate of H2 generation expressed as LH2⋅min−1⋅g−1cat.
Figure 3. The influence of oxides on the hydrogen generation during catalytic hydrolysis of NH3BH3 (0.123 M) at 60 °C. The numbers indicate the attainable rate of H2 generation expressed as LH2⋅min−1⋅g−1cat.
Materials 14 05422 g003
Figure 4. The influence of ferrites on hydrogen generation (symbol + line) and temperature of reaction layer (line) during the catalytic hydrothermolysis of NH3BH3 at external heating of reactor at 90 °C and a molar ratio of H2O/NH3BH3 = 2.
Figure 4. The influence of ferrites on hydrogen generation (symbol + line) and temperature of reaction layer (line) during the catalytic hydrothermolysis of NH3BH3 at external heating of reactor at 90 °C and a molar ratio of H2O/NH3BH3 = 2.
Materials 14 05422 g004
Figure 5. The effect of reductive ability of hydride medium on the hydrogen generation during catalytic hydrolysis of solutions of NH3BH3 (0.123 M), NaBH4 (0.123 M) and NH3BH3 (0.105 M) with NaBH4 (0.018 M) over copper and cobalt ferrites at 40 °C.
Figure 5. The effect of reductive ability of hydride medium on the hydrogen generation during catalytic hydrolysis of solutions of NH3BH3 (0.123 M), NaBH4 (0.123 M) and NH3BH3 (0.105 M) with NaBH4 (0.018 M) over copper and cobalt ferrites at 40 °C.
Materials 14 05422 g005
Figure 6. The activity of CuFe-combustion products (Table 2) in the catalytic hydrolysis of NH3BH3 (0.123 M) at 60 °C.
Figure 6. The activity of CuFe-combustion products (Table 2) in the catalytic hydrolysis of NH3BH3 (0.123 M) at 60 °C.
Materials 14 05422 g006
Figure 7. The activity of CuFe-combustion products (Table 2) in the catalytic hydrothermolysis of NH3BH3 at external heating of reactor at 90 °C and molar ratio of H2O/NH3BH3 = 2. The solid lines are the hydrogen generation curves; the dotted lines are curves of temperature of reaction medium.
Figure 7. The activity of CuFe-combustion products (Table 2) in the catalytic hydrothermolysis of NH3BH3 at external heating of reactor at 90 °C and molar ratio of H2O/NH3BH3 = 2. The solid lines are the hydrogen generation curves; the dotted lines are curves of temperature of reaction medium.
Materials 14 05422 g007
Figure 8. For an inactive CuFe-5 sample before catalytic experiments, (a,d) dark-field images with (b,e) the corresponding elemental mappings, (c) concentrations distribution at a particle scanning shown at (b), (fh) HRTEM images, and (g) the selected area and its diffraction pattern.
Figure 8. For an inactive CuFe-5 sample before catalytic experiments, (a,d) dark-field images with (b,e) the corresponding elemental mappings, (c) concentrations distribution at a particle scanning shown at (b), (fh) HRTEM images, and (g) the selected area and its diffraction pattern.
Materials 14 05422 g008
Figure 9. For an active CuFe-1 sample before catalytic experiments, (a,d) dark-field images with (bf) the corresponding elemental mappings, (h) elemental mappings for another particle, and (i,j) HRTEM images.
Figure 9. For an active CuFe-1 sample before catalytic experiments, (a,d) dark-field images with (bf) the corresponding elemental mappings, (h) elemental mappings for another particle, and (i,j) HRTEM images.
Materials 14 05422 g009
Figure 10. The change of activity of Fe3O4 in the catalytic hydrolysis of NH3BH3 (0.123 M) at 60 °C upon its modification by CuO (10 wt%).
Figure 10. The change of activity of Fe3O4 in the catalytic hydrolysis of NH3BH3 (0.123 M) at 60 °C upon its modification by CuO (10 wt%).
Materials 14 05422 g010
Table 1. The comparison the results of X-ray diffraction (XRD) method and differential dissolution (DD) for the samples of copper and cobalt ferrites prepared by combustion synthesis.
Table 1. The comparison the results of X-ray diffraction (XRD) method and differential dissolution (DD) for the samples of copper and cobalt ferrites prepared by combustion synthesis.
SampleXRD (wt%)DD (wt%) 1
CuFe-184% Cu1−xFe2+xO4 (cub. spinel) CSR = 62 nm
13 % CuFeO2 CSR = 130 nm
3% CuO
75.9% Cu0.29Fe1 2
14.4% Cu1
9.7% Fe1
CoFe90% Co1−xFe2+xO4 (cub. spinel) CSR = 93 nm
8% CoO CSR = 40 nm
3% Co (cub.)
87.4 % Co0.43Fe1 3
8.2% Co1
4.4% Fe1
1 Since oxygen is not determined by the DD method, the stoichiometric formulas of the corresponding phases are traditionally presented without oxygen. 2 Corresponds to Cu0.67Fe2.33O4 formula. 3 Corresponds to Co0.90Fe2.10O4 formula.
Table 2. The results of X-ray diffraction method and specific surface values for the different combustion products obtained in different regimes.
Table 2. The results of X-ray diffraction method and specific surface values for the different combustion products obtained in different regimes.
SampleSBET (m2/g)Phase Composition (wt%)
1CuFe-1484% spinel (cub.) CSR = 62 nm
3% CuO
13% CuFeO2 CSR = 130 nm
2CuFe-2773% spinel (cub.) CSR = 49 nm
6% Cu CSR > 150 nm
12% CuO CSR = 20 nm
9% Fe2O3 CSR = 31 nm
3CuFe-3766% spinel (cub.) CSR = 52 nm
14% Cu CSR > 150 nm
6% CuO
8% Fe2O3 CSR = 54 nm
6% CuFeO2
4CuFe-4348% spinel (cub.) CSR = 62 nm
15% Cu SCR > 150 nm
6% Cu2O
26% Fe2O3 CSR = 93 nm
5% CuFeO2
5CuFe-5<134% spinel (cub.) CSR = 77 nm
18% Cu CSR > 150 nm
7% Cu2O CSR = 28 nm
40% Fe2O3 SCR = 71 nm
Table 3. The comparison the phase composition of CuFe-1 and CuFe-2 according to the results of X-ray diffraction method (XRD) and differential dissolution (DD).
Table 3. The comparison the phase composition of CuFe-1 and CuFe-2 according to the results of X-ray diffraction method (XRD) and differential dissolution (DD).
SampleXRD (wt%)DD (wt%)
CuFe-184% Cu1−xFe2+xO4 (cub. spinel)
13% CuFeO2
3% CuO
75.9% Cu0.29Fe1 1
14.4% Cu1
9.7% Fe1
CuFe-273% spinel
6% Cu
12% CuO
9% Fe2O3
66.7% Cu0.06Fe1 2
29.3% Cu1
4.0% Fe1
1 Corresponds to Cu0.67Fe2.33O4 formula. 2 Corresponds to Cu0.16Fe2.84O4 formula.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Komova, O.V.; Simagina, V.I.; Pochtar, A.A.; Bulavchenko, O.A.; Ishchenko, A.V.; Odegova, G.V.; Gorlova, A.M.; Ozerova, A.M.; Lipatnikova, I.L.; Tayban, E.S.; et al. Catalytic Behavior of Iron-Containing Cubic Spinel in the Hydrolysis and Hydrothermolysis of Ammonia Borane. Materials 2021, 14, 5422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185422

AMA Style

Komova OV, Simagina VI, Pochtar AA, Bulavchenko OA, Ishchenko AV, Odegova GV, Gorlova AM, Ozerova AM, Lipatnikova IL, Tayban ES, et al. Catalytic Behavior of Iron-Containing Cubic Spinel in the Hydrolysis and Hydrothermolysis of Ammonia Borane. Materials. 2021; 14(18):5422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Komova, Oksana V., Valentina I. Simagina, Alena A. Pochtar, Olga A. Bulavchenko, Arcady V. Ishchenko, Galina V. Odegova, Anna M. Gorlova, Anna M. Ozerova, Inna L. Lipatnikova, Elena S. Tayban, and et al. 2021. "Catalytic Behavior of Iron-Containing Cubic Spinel in the Hydrolysis and Hydrothermolysis of Ammonia Borane" Materials 14, no. 18: 5422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop