Next Article in Journal
Loss Factor Behavior of Thermally Aged Magnetorheological Elastomers
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Phase Segregation in p-Type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 Thermoelectric Alloys by In Situ Melt Spinning to Determine Possible Carrier Filtering Effect
Previous Article in Journal
“Success Depends on Your Backbone”—About the Use of Polymers as Essential Materials Forming Orodispersible Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ti Addition Effect on the Grain Structure Evolution and Thermoelectric Transport Properties of Hf0.5Zr0.5NiSn0.98Sb0.02 Half-Heusler Alloy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development of High-Performance Thermoelectric Materials by Microstructure Control of P-Type BiSbTe Based Alloys Fabricated by Water Atomization

Materials 2021, 14(17), 4870; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174870
by Babu Madavali 1, Pathan Sharief 1, Kyoung-Tae Park 2, Gian Song 1, Song-Yi Back 3, Jong-Soo Rhyee 3 and Soon-Jik Hong 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2021, 14(17), 4870; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174870
Submission received: 22 July 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 23 August 2021 / Published: 27 August 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper reports the development of high-performance thermoelectric materials through microstructure controlling by optimizing initial powder size of p-type BiSbTe based alloys fabricated by water atomization. In general, the manuscript is well-organized, logically laid out and the experimental approach is technically sound. This paper is possibly publishable. For improving a manuscript, it is advisable to address the following comments:


1.    Please explain why the alloy powder in size of > 200 um was not investigated.
2.    In Fig.5(b), it was found that the Seebeck coefficient of all alloys increased but then decreased during the increasing temperature. Please explain it.
3.    In Fig.6(a), it was seen that the thermal conductivity of all alloys decreased but then increased during the increasing temperature. Please explain it.
4.    How about the performance of your thermoelectric alloy materials in this method, compared with others reported in the literature?   

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please find my comments attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment for the responses. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have made reasonable changes in light of the comments from the reviewer, however, my concern remains at large related to English writing style. The author's notes (cover letter) as well as the manuscript, still contains many punctuation, grammatical and sentence structure mistakes.

 

For example:

 Meanwhile, Cu has chosen as a dopant in BiSbTe system to suppress of intrinsic conduction at elevated temperatures. 

and

 The fabricated powders have wide range of particle sizes due to the different in cooling rate during the process 

etc.

These mistakes are numerous throughout and matter of seriousness. This manuscript should not pass to publication with such trivial mistakes and crude writing style.

Also when mentioning the instruments in experimental section on which the analytical task was conducted, please specify its details and make in full.

Following these correction, I can recommend this manuscript for publication at MDPI Materials.

Author Response

Thank you for the reviewer suggestions to our manuscript. We have modified the manuscript with native English speaker through English Language Editing center. [Please see the attachment for English correction certificate]

In addition, we have added the instrument full details with corresponding company names in the experimental part, and added the specimen dimensions for the thermoelectric measurements.

[Please see corrections in the Page#5&Lines#16-23; and Page#6 & lines#1-7]

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop