An Experimental Study of Clogging Recovery Measures for Ceramic Permeable Bricks
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Method
2.1. Permeable Bricks
2.2. Original Filtration Suspension
2.3. The Process of Blockage
2.4. Experimental Cleaning Scheme
2.5. Test Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Recovery Effects of Different Measures
3.2. Operating Conditions for Pressure Washing
3.3. Pore Change in the Recovery Process
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The order of the recovery effect was pressure washing > vacuuming suction > manual sweeping. Pressure washing flushed out the surface and internal clogged particles with the flushing flow, while vacuuming could extract the particles that were not strongly adhered in the pores. However, as a means of pretreatment, manual sweeping prevented the formation of a hydraulic barrier but would allow partial smaller particles to further block the brick.
- (2)
- Pressure washing was recommended the most appropriate recovery measure, the joint methods was not recommended as the combined effect was not obvious and poor performance to price ratio.
- (3)
- Strategies improving the recovery effect of pressure washing could be obtained through this research. Increasing the frequency, prolonging the time, or cleaning under moist conditions can effectively improve the recovery effect of pressure washing.
- (4)
- In the context of the recovery process, hydraulic cleaning can not only increase isolated pores but also connect the blocked particles, thus increasing the proportion of connected pores and dredges through water channels.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Byungsung, K.; Seokhwa, L.; Sangjin, L.; Jongseok, B.; Jaemoon, K. A study on the water cycle improvement plan of low impact development. J. Korean Soc. Water Environ. 2020, 36, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, H.; Ouyang, X.; Liu, Z. Comparison of the decontamination performance of three permeable bricks: Adsorption and filtration experiments. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, H.; Liu, Z.; Ouyang, X. A novel structure applied to the permeable brick paving system and its decontamination performance. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 4213–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, H. Influence of fillers on the removal of rainwater runoff pollutants by a permeable brick system with a frame structure base. Water Sci. Technol. 2019, 80, 2131–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, Z.; Chen, H.; Yang, H. Risk of contamination of infiltrated water and underground soil by heavy metals within a ceramic permeable brick paving system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 22795–22805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, Z.; Chen, H.; Yang, H. The potential pollution risk of groundwater by a ceramic permeable brick paving system. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.A.; Imteaz, M.A.; Arulrajah, A.; Piratheepan, J.; Disfani, M.M. Construction and demolition materials in permeable pavement systems:geotechnical and hydraulic characteristics. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 90, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, D.; Li, T.; Zhang, Z. The effect of different surface materials on runoff quality in permeable pavement systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 21103–21110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichols, P.; White, R.; Lucke, T. Do sediment type and test durations affect results of laboratory-based, accelerated testing studies of permeable pavement clogging? Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratt, C.J.; Mantle, J.; Schofield, P.A. UK research into the performance of permeable pavement, reservoir structures in controlling stormwater discharge quantity and quality. Water Sci. Technol. 1995, 32, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuguang, L.; Dae-Geun, P.; Sung, W.R.; Byeong-Tae, L.; Yoon-Ho, C. Development of permeability test method for porous concrete block pavement materials considering clogging. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 118, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Beecham, S.; Liu, J.; Pezzaniti, D. The influence of rainfall intensity and duration on sediment pathways and subsequent clogging in permeable pavements. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 246, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferguson, B.K. Porous Pavements; CRC Press/Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Praticò, F.G.; Vaiana, R.; Giunta, M. Sustainable rehabilitation of porous European mixes. In Proceedings of the ICSDC 2011: Integrating Sustainability Practices in the Construction Industry, Kansas City, MO, USA, 23–25 March 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Drake, J.; Bradford, A. Assessing the potential for restoration of surface permeability for permeable pavements through maintenance. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 68, 1950–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Henderson, V.; Tighe, S.L. Evaluation of pervious concrete pavement permeability renewal maintenance methods at field sites in Canada. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2011, 38, 1404–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winston, R.J.; Al-Rubaei, A.M.; Blecken, G.T.; Viklander, M.; Hunt, W.F. Maintenance measures for preservation and recovery of permeable pavement surface infiltration rate—The effects of street sweeping, vacuum cleaning, high pressure washing, and milling. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 169, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chopra, M.; Kakuturu, S.; Ballock, C.; Spence, J.; Wanielista, M. Effect of rejuvenation methods on the infiltration rates of pervious concrete pavements. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2010, 15, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dougherty, M.; Hein, M.; Martina, B.A.; Ferguson, B.K. Quick surface infiltration test to assess maintenance needs on small pervious concrete sites. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2011, 137, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manahiloh, K.N.; Muhunthan, B.; Kayhanian, M.; Gebremariam, S.Y. X-ray computed tomography and nondestructive evaluation of clogging in porous concrete field samples. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2012, 24, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, H. Study on the process and characteristics of clogging for ceramic permeable brick. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021, 8481571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, H.P. Urban Stormwater Quality: A Statistical Overview; CRC for Catchment Hydrology: Victoria, Australia, 1999; p. 134. [Google Scholar]
- Zuo, X.J.; Fu, D.F.; Li, H. Distribution characteristics of particle size and pollutants in road runoff during different types of rainfall. J. Southeast Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2011, 41, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayhanian, M.; Anderson, D.; Harvey, J.T.; Jones, D.; Muhunthan, B. Permeability measurement and scan imaging to assess clogging of pervious concrete pavements in parking lots. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 95, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chopra, M.; Stuart, E.; Wanielista, M.P. Pervious pavement systems in Florida—Research results. In Proceedings of the Low Impact Development International Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 11–14 April 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Danz, M.E.; Selbig, W.R.; Buer, N.H. Assessment of restorative maintenance practices on the infiltration capacity of permeable pavement. Water 2020, 12, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sehgal, K.; Drake, J.; Tim, S.; William, V.L. Improving restorative maintenance practices for mature permeable interlocking concrete pavements. Water 2018, 10, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- David, R.S.; Donald, R. Can One Machine Clean All Permeable Pavements? Available online: https://runoffreducer.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SWM-PAVE-Cyclone-CY5500.pdf (accessed on 2 July 2021).
- Golroo, A.; Tighe, S.L. Pervious concrete pavement performance modeling: An empirical approach in cold climates. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2012, 39, 1100–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Shao, Z.; Xu, T. Pore structure of ancient Chinese bricks under environmental vicissitudes. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2016, 20, 1895–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type of Pavement | Pavement Age/Year | Maintenance Type | Recovery Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|
PICP [15] | 4 | an Elgin Whirlwind vacuum truck with maximum power (2500 rpm) | Partial restoration of surface permeability with large spatial variability |
PC [16] | 2 | Rinsing the surface with a garden hose or large hose | Over 90% of an area where permeability was obviously improved |
Vacuuming with a peak of 5.0 horsepower | 20−80% of an area where permeability was improved | ||
PA [17] | 21 | a Dustcontrol DC 50-W industrial wet/dry vacuum | Permeability coefficient of post-maintenance was 3.5 times higher than pre-maintenance |
a Nilfisk ALTO Poseidon 2–22 XT high pressure washer | Permeability coefficient of post-maintenance was 36 mm·min−1, 360 times higher than pre-maintenance | ||
28 | a Dustcontrol DC 50-W industrial wet/dry vacuum | Permeability coefficient of post-maintenance was 6 times higher than pre-maintenance | |
a Nilfisk ALTO Poseidon 2–22 XT high pressure washer | Permeability coefficient of post-maintenance was 0.42 mm·min−1, 4.2 times higher than pre-maintenance | ||
PC [18] | 6–18 | A 4.85-kW vacuum sweeper | Permeability coefficient of post-maintenance was 25.4 cm·h−1, 10.45 times higher than pre-maintenance |
A 20.7-MPa pressure washer | Permeability coefficient of post-maintenance was 6 times higher than pre-maintenance | ||
PC [19] | 4 | A 6.5 HP Briggs Stratton pressure washer | An average 20-fold infiltration rate improvement |
PC [20] | 1 | Vacuum chamber driven with a 932.5 W pump. | Partial restoration while porosity recovered from 26% to 29% |
8 | Vacuum chamber driven with a 932.5 W pump. | Less influenced while porosity recovered from 7.9% to 19.1% |
Item | Degree of Clogging | Cleaning Duration (min) | Maintenance Methods | Moisture Condition |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Low | 1.5 | Pressure washing (P) | Dry |
2 | Low | 3 | Pressure washing (P) | Dry |
3 | High | 1.5 | Pressure washing (P) | Dry |
4 | High | 3 | Pressure washing (P) | Dry |
5 | Medium | 1.5 | Pressure washing (P) | Dry |
6 | Medium | 3 | Pressure washing (P) | Dry |
7 | Medium | 3 | Manual surface cleaning (M) | Dry |
8 | Medium | 3 | Vacuum cleaning (V) | Dry |
9 | Medium | 3 | Manual surface cleaning + Pressure washing (MP) | Dry |
10 | Medium | 3 | Manual surface cleaning + Vacuum cleaning (MV) | Dry |
11 | Medium | 3 | Pressure washing + Vacuum cleaning (PV) | Dry |
12 | Medium | 3 | Manual surface cleaning + Pressure washing + Vacuum cleaning (MPV) | Dry |
13 | Medium | 3 | Pressure washing(P) | Wet |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lin, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, H. An Experimental Study of Clogging Recovery Measures for Ceramic Permeable Bricks. Materials 2021, 14, 3904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143904
Lin Z, Yang H, Chen H. An Experimental Study of Clogging Recovery Measures for Ceramic Permeable Bricks. Materials. 2021; 14(14):3904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143904
Chicago/Turabian StyleLin, Zizeng, Hai Yang, and Huiming Chen. 2021. "An Experimental Study of Clogging Recovery Measures for Ceramic Permeable Bricks" Materials 14, no. 14: 3904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143904