Next Article in Journal
Precipitation Strengthening of Cu–Ni–Si Alloy
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Regeneration of Copper-Coated Gas Diffusion Electrodes for Electroreduction of CO2 to Ethylene
Previous Article in Journal
The Interfacial Adhesion Performance and Mechanism of a Modified Asphalt–Steel Slag Aggregate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/ma13051183
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Use of Valsartan Metal Complexes as Media for Carbon Dioxide Storage

by
Alaa Mohammed
1,
Emad Yousif
1,* and
Gamal A. El-Hiti
2,*
1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad 64021, Iraq
2
Cornea Research Chair, Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(5), 1183; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051183
Submission received: 13 February 2020 / Revised: 2 March 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 6 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovation in Adsorption Processes and Materials for CO2 Capture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To address global warming through carbon dioxide storage, three valsartan metal complexes were synthesized in excellent yields (87–92%) through a reaction of the appropriate metal chloride (tin chloride, nickel chloride hexahydrate, or magnesium chloride hexahydrate) and excess valsartan (two mole equivalents) in boiling methanol for 3 h. The structures of the metal complexes were established based on the data obtained from ultraviolet-visible, Fourier transform infrared, and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra, as well as from elemental analysis, energy-dispersive X-ray spectra, and magnetic susceptibility. The agglomeration and shape of the particles were determined using field emission scanning electron microscopy analysis. The surface area (16.63–22.75 m2/g) of the metal complexes was measured using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method, whereas the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda method was used to determine the particle pore size (0.011–0.108 cm3/g), total average pore volume (6.50–12.46 nm), and pore diameter (6.50–12.47 nm), for the metal complexes. The carbon dioxide uptake of the synthesized complexes, at 323 K and 4 MPa (40 bar), ranged from 24.11 to 34.51 cm2/g, and the nickel complex was found to be the most effective sorbent for carbon dioxide storage.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Earth’s atmosphere acts as a solar energy snare to maintain the global temperature at a natural average level to make life on earth possible. The atmosphere tends to absorb heat and re-emit the energy back into space in a different direction [1]. Over the years, the atmosphere, seas, and oceans have stored billion of tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the process of establishing the carbon cycle [2], but the high demand for energy has led to the consumption of fossil fuels on a very large scale. As a result, high levels of greenhouse gases such as CO2 are produced in the environment, leading to global warming [3,4,5,6]. The current high level of CO2 upsets the natural balance of the solar system on Earth. Such effect leads to an increase in the Earth’s temperature, floods due to rising sea levels, the melting of ice at the South and North poles, and undesirable weather changes [7]. In addition, natural gases containing CO2 have poor quality and energy capacity and could corrode pipelines [8]. Therefore, lowering the CO2 level in the atmosphere has become a priority. Two convenient routes can be followed simultaneously: either use renewable sources of energy, which are currently not sufficient, or develop new technologies to capture and store CO2 [9,10,11]. Recently, the design and use of new materials to capture and store greenhouse gases has become a hot topic [12,13,14,15].
CO2 uptake and storage is a technology that is commonly used to decrease the level of CO2 in the atmosphere [14]. A process using ethanolamine as an adsorbent for CO2 has proven to be expensive to implement, because it requires high energy and the use of highly volatile materials [16,17]. Therefore, alterative chemical adsorbents are needed that are simple and cheap to produce, making the process of adsorption economically viable [18]. Materials used to adsorb CO2 should have an excellent adsorption capacity and the ability to be regenerated and reused several times without losing their efficiency [19]. Zeolites, silica, and activated carbon-containing materials have been tested as storage media for CO2 [20,21,22,23,24]. However, little success has been achieved with these materials, either because they are strongly hydrophilic, as in zeolites, or they have poor gas selectivity, as in activated carbons [25,26]. Polymers, resins, and biomass have also been used to produce activated carbon materials [22]. Chemical activators can be added to activate carbon-containing materials to improve their CO2 uptake efficiency.
In recent years, porous materials with large surface areas have been used as CO2 storage media [10]. Such materials have different adsorption capacities depending on their structure [27]. The most common porous materials used in gas storage are porous organic polymers (POPs) and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [10,28]. Well-designed porous solids can be produced using molecular building blocks [29]. The capacity of porous MOF solids toward CO2 uptake can be enhanced by increasing the MOF surface area and by including polar groups within their structures [10,30]. The strong hydrogen bonds between CO2 and MOFs lead to high adsorption efficiencies [31]. POPs have high the needed qualities to act as effective materials to capture CO2 [32]. However, their synthetic procedures involve the use metal catalysts under harsh reaction conditions [25].
Valsartan, N-{4-[(1-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) phenyl) benzyl}-N-valeryl-L-valine, is a medication that is mainly used to reduce high blood pressure and to treat heart failure [33,34]. It is highly stable, has a high molecular weight (435.5), a high aromatic content (two aryl groups and a tetrazole ring), has various functionalities (ketone, ester, and NH), and contains a high proportion (27%) of heteroatoms (nitrogen and oxygen). These properties could enable valsartan metal complexes to act as media to capture CO2, since POPs and MOFs are highly aromatic and contain nitrogen, oxygen, and metals (boron, silicon, and phosphorous). In the current study, the synthesis of three valsartan metal complexes and their use as media for capturing CO2 were investigated. Recently, we showed that various materials can be used as efficient media for CO2 capture [35,36,37,38].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

Metal chlorides, valsartan, and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Schnelldorf, Bavaria, Germany). Elemental analyses of the metal complexes were performed using a Vario EL III instrument (Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). An AA-6880 Shimadzu atomic absorption flame spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the metal content within the synthesized complexes. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra (400–4000 cm−1) of the metal complexes were recorded using an FT-IR 8300 Shimadzu spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan) and KBr pellets. The ultraviolet-visible adsorption spectra (200–800 nm) of the metal complexes were measured in ethanol using a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra were measured in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) using a Bruker DRX400 NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Zürich, Switzerland) at 400 MHz. The magnetic susceptibilities of the complexes were measured using a Bruker BM6 magnetic balance (Bruker, Zürich, Switzerland). The conductivity measurements of the metal complex solutions (10−3 mole/L) in DMSO were performed at 25 °C on a WTW ProfiLine Oxi 3205 conventional portable meter (Xylem Inc., Weinheim, Germany). The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyses were performed on a TESCAN MIRA3 LMU system (Kohoutovice, Czech Republic) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV.

2.2. Synthesis of Metal Complexes

A solution of the appropriate metal chloride (1.0 mmol), i.e., tin (IV) chloride (SnCl2), nickel (II) chloride hexahydrate (NiCl2·6H2O), or magnesium (II) chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O), in methanol (MeOH, 5 mL) was added to a stirred solution of valsartan (0.87 g, 2.0 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL). The mixture was heated under reflux for 3 h. The solid obtained on cooling was filtered off, washed with MeOH, and recrystallized from ethanol to give the corresponding metal complex.

2.3. Nitrogen Gas Adsorption Measurements

The metal complexes were dried at 100 °C for 5 h prior to the measurements. The specific surface areas of the metal complexes were evaluated from the N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. The pore volumes and sizes were determined using the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method.

2.4. CO2 Storage Measurements

The CO2 uptake of the synthesized metal complexes was measured using an H-sorb 2600 high-pressure volumetric adsorption analyzer (Beijing, China). A sample of the appropriate metal complex (1 g) was degassed in a vacuum oven for 5 h at 70 °C to remove the moisture trapped within the pores. The CO2 uptake experiment was carried out several times to optimize the pressure. The CO2 adsorption results were reproducible from the experiments that have been carried out at the same conditions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Metal Complexes

The reaction of valsartan (two mole equivalents) and the appropriate metal chloride (SnCl2, NiCl2·6H2O, or MgCl2·6H2O) in boiling methanol afforded the corresponding valsartan metal complex (Figure 1 and Figure 2) in excellent yield. The purity of the synthesized complexes was determined by the elemental analyses of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. In addition, the metal content was measured using a flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The color, melting point (M.P.), yields, and elemental analyses of the synthesized metal complexes are shown in Table 1.
The elemental compositions of the metal complexes were analyzed using energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), which confirmed the types of elements that each complex contained. The EDX graphs of metal complexes are shown in Figures S1–S3. The synthesized metal complexes were characterized by FT-IR spectra. Table 2 presents the main functional groups (C=O and M–O) within the complexes [39]. The absorption bands for the asymmetric carbonyl groups of the carboxylic moieties within the metal complexes shifted to longer wavenumbers (1732–1735 cm−1), compared to that obtained for valsartan (1670 cm−1) [40]. Similarly, the symmetric absorption bands for the C=O bonds of the carboxylic groups appeared in the 1470–1474 cm−1 region compared to 1442 cm−1 for valsartan. The FT-IR spectra of the metal complexes showed new absorption bands that were assigned to νSn–O (451 cm−1), νNi–O (466 cm−1), and νMg–O (513 cm−1) [41,42,43]. The FT-IR spectra of the Ni and Mg complexes showed broad absorption bands at around 3400 cm−1 due to the OH group of the water molecules associated with the metal [44]. The difference between the asymmetric and symmetric vibration frequencies of the C=O bonds of the carboxyl groups was in the range of 258–265 cm−1, which confirmed the bidentate asymmetry of the metal complexes [45]. The FT IR spectra of valsartan and its metal complexes are shown in in Figures S4–S7.
The electronic spectra of the metal complexes showed a strong absorption band in the 263–264 nm region due to the π→π* electronic transition (Table 2). No d–d transition was observed for either the Sn (IV) or the Mg (II) complex, because they are diamagnetic. The geometry of the Sn and Mg complexes could be sp3d2-octahedral. However, the electronic spectra of the Ni (II) complex showed an absorption band at 458 nm (21,834 cm−1), which is attributed to the d–d transition of the type 3A2g (F)→3T1g (P) [46]. The UV spectra of valsartan and its metal complexes are shown in Figures S8–S11. The magnetic moment of the Ni complex was approximately 2.5 B.M, which indicates a high-spin sp3d2-octahedral complex [47]. The molar conductivity measurements confirmed that the synthesized metal complexes were nonelectrolytes. Such results confirm that no ions were liberated in solution, which indicates that anions were present inside the coordination sphere, leading to low molar conductivity (2.2–2.6 µS/cm) [48].
The structures of the synthesized metal complexes were also confirmed from the 1H-NMR spectral data (Table 3). The 1H-NMR spectra of the complexes showed the absence of a carboxylate proton, which appeared as an exchangeable singlet at 12.63 ppm in the spectrum of valsartan. The deportation of the carboxylic group clearly indicates the formation of O–M bonds. The NH and CH2-N protons appeared as singlet signals in the 6.12–6.01 and 4.63–4.59 ppm regions, respectively. The OH protons of water molecules in both the Ni (II) and Mg (II) complexes were not seen, since they overlapped with protons of water in DMSO-d6 [49]. The spectra showed all other protons in the expected chemical shift regions. The 1H NMR spectra of valsartan and its metal complexes are shown in Figures S12–S15.

3.2. Surface Morphology of Metal Complexes

FESEM provides high-resolution, clear, and less-distorted images of the particles of the examined materials. Therefore, the surface morphologies of the synthesized complexes were investigated using FESEM. Figure 3 shows that the surfaces of the metal complexes consisted of very small particles that agglomerated in homogeneous forms at low and high magnification level. The particles had different shapes and diameters, crystals, and some cracks in the cement wall shapes.

3.3. CO2 Uptake Capacity of Metal Complexes

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the synthesized metal complexes are shown in Figure 4. For the Sn and Mg complexes isotherms, the adsorption and desorption branches are completely overlapped, while no overlap was seen for the adsorption and desorption curves related to the Ni complex and no hysteresis loop was generated, as usually happens for mesoporous materials. Based on the IUPAC physisorption isotherm classification, the isotherms of the Sn and Mg complexes are type III, whereas the Ni complex has a type IV isotherm. The sharp bend at the beginning of the curve for the Ni complex is where the completion of monolayer coverage followed by pore condensation is joined by hysteresis due to the increased number of van der Waals forces [50]. For both type III and IV isotherms, no multilayer formation was identified, and both are associated with mesoporous materials. In addition, the adsorbent-adsorbate interactions were relatively weak, and the gas was absorbed on the surface of the complex around the active sites [51,52].
The BET method is the most widely used method to determine the surface area of a porous material in which the physical adsorption of gas on a solid surface is studied. The pore-size distribution and pore volume were calculated from the N2 adsorption data using the BJH model [53]. The pore-size distributions of the complexes were obtained by plotting the pore volume (dV/dW, where V and W are the volume and diameter of the pores, respectively) versus the pore-size diameter [54]. Figure 5 shows that the pores had diameters between 2 and 120 nm, and that the pore size decreased within increasing pore volume. The pore volume of the Ni (II) complex was higher than those obtained for both the Sn (IV) and Mg (II) complexes. Table 4 shows the surface area (SBET), calculated using the BET method; total pore volume, which was evaluated from the single-point adsorption at a relative pressure of 0.95; and the BJH adsorption average pore size. The synthesized metal complexes had small surface areas (15.96–22.75 m2/g) and small pores volumes and diameters. The Ni (II) complex had the highest surface area, pore volume, and diameter compared to the other two complexes.
The CO2 adsorption isotherms of the metal complexes measured at 323 K and up to 4 MPa (40 bar) are shown in Figure 6. The metal complexes adsorption isotherms represented in Figure 6 clearly showed that the interaction between the metal complexes and CO2 was not favorable. Additionally, the adsorption volume of CO2 increased sharply as the pressure reached to 4 MPa. The Ni complex, which had the highest surface area, was the most effective complex toward CO2 adsorption (34.51 cm2/g) compared to both the Sn (27.37 cm2/g) and the Mg (24.11 cm2/g) complexes. The behavior of both the Sn and Mg complexes was almost similar until the pressure reached 3.3 MPa (33 bar). However, the performance of the Sn complex was slightly better than that of the Mg complex at a higher pressure. For example, the adsorption of volume at 3.5 and 4 MPa was 24.3 and 27.4 cm3/g for the Sn complex and 21.7 and 24.14 cm3/g for the Mg complex, respectively. The variation between the Sn and Mg complexes in terms of CO2 uptake at a pressures greater than 3.3 MPa (33 bar) depends on the strength of the interaction between the gas molecules and the adsorbent material, but the difference was limited. Table 5 shows the CO2 uptake capacity of metal complexes recorded at 323 K and 4 MPa (40 bar).
The CO2 uptake capacities of the synthesized metal complexes were comparable to those of polyphosphates containing 1,4-diaminobenzene and telmisartan tin complexes and lower than those obtained in the presence of melamine Schiff bases and polyphosphates containing benzidine as adsorbents (Table 6). However, nanocarbons such as polyacrylonitrile and resorcinol-formaldehyde resin in the presence of a base (potassium hydroxide or potassium carbonate) provided remarkable CO2 uptakes of 4.95 and 2.74 mmol/g, respectively, at 25 °C and 100 KPa (1 bar) [23,55]. In the current study, the high pressure used limited the application of the synthesized materials as carbon dioxide storage media. Nevertheless, the materials had some good properties to be tested as additives to inhibit photodegradation of poly (vinyl chloride) upon irradiation with ultraviolet light for long duration.
Heteroatoms (oxygen and nitrogen) and the amide linkage (–CONH–) in valsartan have a high polarity and a nucleophilic nature that would enhance the interaction between CO2 and the adsorbent [56,57]. In addition, the metal acts as a Lewis acid that would promote the electrostatic interaction with CO2 [58,59]. The van der Waals weak bonds are common in materials that have small pore sizes [60]. The Ni complex is highly acidic, with a high surface area and large pore diameter, compared to the other two metal complexes [61]. Nevertheless, the physisorption phenomena are generally limited due to the metal complexes textural properties.

4. Conclusions

Three valsartan complexes were synthesized in high yields using a simple procedure, and their structures were established using various spectroscopic and analytical techniques. The surface morphologies of the metal complexes were inspected using FESEM, which showed different particle shapes and sizes. The surface areas of the metal complexes were relatively small, but that of the Ni complex was the highest. Similar observations were made with pore volumes and diameters. The Ni complex showed the highest affinity toward carbon dioxide capture compared to the Sn and Mg complexes, possibly due to its relatively high surface area compared to those of the other complexes. Additionally, Sn metal is a stronger Lewis acid than the other two metals, which would promote the electrostatic interaction with carbon dioxide. The efficiency of the synthesized metal complexes as carbon capture media is comparable with those reported for some polyphosphates and telmisartan tin complexes, but lower than those reported for melamine Schiff bases and highly aromatic polyphosphates [35,36,37,38].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/5/1183/s1, Figure S1: EDX graphs of Sn (IV) complex, Figure S2: EDX graphs of Ni (II) complex, Figure S3: EDX graphs of Mg (II) complex, Figure S4: UV spectrum of valsartan, Figure S5: UV spectrum of Sn (IV) complex, Figure S6: UV spectrum of Ni (II) complex, Figure S7: UV spectrum of Mg (II) complex, Figure S8: FT-IR spectrum of valsartan, Figure S9: FT-IR spectrum of Sn (IV) complex, Figure S10: FT-IR spectrum of Ni (II) complex, Figure S11: FT-IR spectrum of Mg (II) complex, Figure S12: 1H-NMR spectrum of valsartan, Figure S13: 1HVNMR spectrum of Sn (IV) complex, Figure S14: 1H-NMR spectrum of Ni (II) complex, Figure S15: 1HVNMR spectrum of Mg (II) complex.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and experimental design, E.Y. and G.A.E.-H.; experimental work and data analysis, A.M.; writing, E.Y. and G.A.E.-H. All authors discussed the results and improved the final text of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, for funding through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Al-Nahrain University for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhong, W.; Haigh, J.D. The greenhouse effect and carbon dioxide. Weather 2013, 68, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wallington, T.J.; Srinivasan, J.; Nielsen, O.J.; Highwood, E.J. Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming. In Environmental and Ecological Chemistry; Sabljic, A., Ed.; EOLSS Publishers: Oxford, UK, 2004; Volume 1, pp. 36–63. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abeydeera, L.H.U.W.; Mesthrige, J.W.; Samarasinghalage, T.I. Global research on carbon emissions: A scientometric review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tung, K.-K.; Chen, X. Understanding the recent global surface warming slowdown: A review. Climate 2018, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Leung, D.Y.C.; Caramanna, G.; Maroto-Valer, M.M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 426–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fanchi, J.R.; Fanchi, C.J. Energy in the 21st Century; World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. D’Alessandro, D.M.; Smit, B.; Long, J.R. Carbon dioxide capture: Prospects for new materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6058–6082. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mastalerz, M.; Schneider, M.W.; Oppel, I.M.; Presly, O. A salicylbisimine cage compound with high surface area and selective CO2/CH4 adsorption. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Owusu, P.A.; Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 2016, 3, 1167990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmed, D.S.; El-Hiti, G.A.; Yousif, E.; Ali, A.A.; Hameed, A.S. Design and synthesis of porous polymeric materials and their applications in gas capture and storage: A review. J. Polym. Res. 2018, 25, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Mamoori, A.; Krishnamurthy, A.; Rownaghi, A.A.; Rezaei, F. Carbon capture and utilization update. Energy Technol. 2017, 5, 834–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yan, Y.; Yang, S.; Blake, A.J.; Schroder, M. Studies on metal-organic frameworks of Cu (II) with isophthalate linkers for hydrogen storage. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Goh, K.; Karahan, H.E.; Yang, E.; Bae, T.-H. Graphene-based membranes for CO2/CH4 separation: Key challenges and perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Aminua, M.D.; Nabavia, S.A.; Rochelleb, C.A.; Manovica, V. A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage. Appl. Energy 2017, 208, 1389–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Thomas, D.M.; Mechery, J.; Paulose, S.V. Carbon dioxide capture strategies from flue gas using microalgae: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 16926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luis, P. Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: Consequences and alternatives. Desalination 2016, 380, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Figueroa, J.D.; Fout, T.; Plasynski, S.; McIlvried, H.; Srivastava, R.D. Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon sequestration program: A review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2008, 2, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Asadi-Sangachini, Z.; Galangash, M.M.; Younesi, H.; Nowrouzi, M. The feasibility of cost-effective manufacturing activated carbon derived from walnut shells for large-scale CO2 capture. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 26542–26552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, S.-Y.; Park, S. A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 23, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, C.; Bai, H.; Su, F.; Chen, W.; Hwang, J.F.; Lee, H.-H. Adsorption of carbon dioxide from gas streams via mesoporous spherical-silica particles. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2010, 60, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hauchhum, L.; Mahanta, P. Carbon dioxide adsorption on zeolites and activated carbon by pressure swing adsorption in a fixed bed. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 2014, 5, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Staciwa, P.; Narkiewicz, U.; Moszyński, D.; Wróbel, R.J.; Cormia, R.D. Carbon spheres as CO2 sorbents. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chiang, Y.-C.; Yeh, C.Y.; Weng, C.H. Carbon dioxide adsorption on porous and functionalized activated carbon fibers. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Al-Ghurabi, E.H.; Ajbar, A.; Asif, M. Enhancement of CO2 removal efficacy of fluidized bed using particle mixing. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, W.; Zhou, M.; Yuan, D. Carbon dioxide capture in amorphous porous organic polymers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 1334–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, R.; Lang, J.; Yan, X. Effect of surface area and heteroatom of porous carbon materials on electrochemical capacitance in aqueous and organic electrolytes. Sci. China Chem. 2014, 57, 1570–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Farrusseng, D. Metal-Organic Frameworks: Applications from Catalysis to Gas Storage; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dawson, R.; Cooper, A.I.; Adams, D.J. Nanoporous organic polymer networks. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 530–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eddaoudi, M.; Moler, D.B.; Li, H.; Chen, B.; Reineke, T.M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Modular chemistry:  Secondary building units as a basis for the design of highly porous and robust metal–organic carboxylate frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, W.; Yuan, D.; Sculley, J.; Zhao, D.; Krishna, R.; Zhou, H.-C. Sulfonate-grafted porous polymer networks for preferential CO2 adsorption at low pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18126–18129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rabbani, M.G.; El-Kaderi, H.M. Template-free synthesis of a highly porous benzimidazole-linked polymer for CO2 capture and H2 storage. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1650–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rabbani, M.G.; Reich, T.E.; Kassab, R.M.; Jackson, K.T.; El-Kaderi, H.M. High CO2 uptake and selectivity by triptycene-derived benzimidazole-linked polymers. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1141–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Corea, L.; Cardoni, O.; Fogari, R.; Innocenti, P.; Porcellati, C.; Provvidenza, M.; Meilenbrock, S.; Sullivan, J.; Bodin, F. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: A comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996, 60, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abraham, I.; MacDonald, K.; Hermans, C.; Aerts, A.; Lee, C.; Brié, H.; Vancayzeele, S. Real-world effectiveness of valsartan on hypertension and total cardiovascular risk: Review and implications of a translational research program. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2011, 7, 209–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Omer, R.M.; Al-Tikrity, E.T.B.; El-Hiti, G.A.; Alotibi, M.F.; Ahmed, D.S.; Yousif, E. Porous aromatic melamine Schiff bases as highly efficient media for carbon dioxide storage. Processes 2020, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Satar, H.A.; Ahmed, A.A.; Yousif, E.; Ahmed, D.S.; Alotibi, M.F.; El-Hiti, G.A. Synthesis of novel heteroatom-doped porous-organic polymers as environmentally efficient media for carbon dioxide storage. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ahmed, D.S.; El-Hiti, G.A.; Yousif, E.; Hameed, A.S.; Abdalla, M. New eco-friendly phosphorus organic polymers as gas storage media. Polymers 2017, 9, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hadi, A.G.; Jawad, K.; Yousif, E.; El-Hiti, G.A.; Alotaibi, M.H.; Ahmed, D.S. Synthesis of telmisartan organotin (IV) complexes and their use as carbon dioxide capture media. Molecules 2019, 24, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sharma, Y.R. Elementary Organic Spectroscopy: Principles and Chemical Applications; S. Chad & Company Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ibrahim, M.; Nada, A.; Kamal, D.E. Density functional theory and FTIR spectroscopic study of carboxyl group. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2005, 43, 911–917. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yousif, E.; Adil, H.; Majeed, A.; Graisa, A.; Farina, Y. Structure and functional activity of some di-organotin (IV) with benzamidophenylalanine. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2009, 4, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  42. Awad, A.A.; Hasson, M.M.; Fadhel, A.A.; Alfarhani, B.F. Synthesis and characterization of a new Schiff base ligand type N2O2 and their cobalt (II), nickel (II), copper (II), and zinc (II) complexes. J. Phys. Conf. Series 2019, 1294, 052040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Refat, M.S.; Mohamed, G.G.; El-Sayed, M.Y.; Killa, H.M.A.; Fetooh, H. Spectroscopic and thermal degradation behavior of Mg (II), Ca (II), Ba (II) and Sr (II) complexes with paracetamol drug. Arab J. Chem. 2017, 10, S2376–S2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Dianu, M.L.; Kriza, A.; Stanica, N.; Musuc, A.M. Transition metal M (II) complexes with isonicotinic acid 2-(9-anthrylmethylene)-hydrazide. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2010, 75, 1515–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alcock, N.W.; Culver, J.; Roe, S.M. Secondary bonding. Part 15. Influence of lone pairs on co-ordination: Comparison of diphenyl-tin (IV) and -tellurium (IV) carboxylates and dithiocarbamates. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1992, 1477–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Biradar, V.D.; Mruthyunjayaswamy, B.H.M. Synthesis characterization and antimicrobial activity studies of some transition metal complexes derived from 3-chloro-N′-[(1E)-(2-hydroxy phenyl)methylene]-6-methoxy-1-benzothiophene-2-carbohydrazide. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 451629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ferenc, W.; Walków-Dziewulska, A.; Sarzynski, J.; Paszkowska, B. Magnetic, thermal and spectral properties of Ni (II) 2,3-, 3,5- and 2,6-dimethoxybenzoates. Ecl. Quím. São Paulo 2006, 31, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Dodoffa, N.I.; Kovala-Demertzib, D.; Kubiakc, M.; Kuduk-Jaworskac, J.; Kochelc, A.; Gornevaa, G.A. Dimethyl sulfoxide containing platinum (II) and palladium (II) chelate complexes of glyoxylic and pyruvic acid thiosemicarbazones. A new class of cytotoxic metal complexes. Z. Naturforsch. B Chem. Sci. 2006, 61, 1110–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Karamunge, K.G.; Vibhute, Y.B. Synthesis and structural studies of complexes of Cu (II), Ni (II) and Co (II) with 2′-hydroxychalcones. Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2012, 10, 490–500. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sotomayor, F.J.; Cychosz, K.A.; Thommes, M. Characterization of micro/mesoporous materials by physisorption: Concepts and case studies. Acc. Mater. Surf. Res. 2018, 3, 34–50. [Google Scholar]
  51. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cychosz, K.A.; Thommes, M. Progress in the physisorption characterization of nanoporous gas storage materials. Engineering 2018, 4, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sing, K. The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterisation of porous materials. Colloids Surf. A 2001, 187–188, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hu, J.; Tang, S.; Zhang, S. Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shales in western Hunan and Hubei Provinces in China. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 28, 522–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Choma, J.; Kloske, M.; Dziura, A.; Stachurska, K.; Jaroniec, M. Preparation and studies of adsorption properties of microporous carbon spheres. Eng. Prot. Environ. 2016, 19, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Trickett, C.A.; Helal, A.; Al Maythalony, B.A.; Yamani, Z.H.; Cordova, K.E.; Yaghi, O.M. The chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kazemi, S.; Safarifard, V. Carbon dioxide capture on metal-organic frameworks with amide-decorated pores. Nanochem. Res. 2018, 3, 62–78. [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, H.; Wang, K.; Sun, Y.; Lollar, C.T.; Li, J.; Zhou, H.-C. Recent advances in gas storage and separation using metal-organic frameworks. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, B.; Yao, S.; Shi, C.; Li, G.; Huo, Q.; Liu, Y. Significant enhancement of gas uptake capacity and selectivity by judiciously increasing open metal sites and Lewis basic sites within two polyhedron-based metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3223–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sumida, K.; Rogow, D.L.; Mason, J.A.; McDonald, T.M.; Bloch, E.D.; Herm, Z.R.; Bae, T.-H.; Long, J.R. Carbon dioxide capture in metalorganic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 724–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huheey, J.E.; Keiter, E.A.; Keiter, R.L.; Medhi, O.K. Inorganic Chemistry: Principles of Structure and Reactivity, 4th ed.; HarperCollins College Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 318–344. [Google Scholar]
Materials 13 01183 g001 550
Figure 1. Synthesis of Sn (IV) complex.
Figure 1. Synthesis of Sn (IV) complex.
Materials 13 01183 g001
Materials 13 01183 g002 550
Figure 2. Synthesis of Ni (II) and Mg (II) complexes.
Figure 2. Synthesis of Ni (II) and Mg (II) complexes.
Materials 13 01183 g002
Materials 13 01183 g003 550
Figure 3. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of Sn (a: 10 μm and b: 200 nm), Ni (c: 10 μm and d: 200 nm), and Mg (e: 10 μm and f: 200 nm) complexes.
Figure 3. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of Sn (a: 10 μm and b: 200 nm), Ni (c: 10 μm and d: 200 nm), and Mg (e: 10 μm and f: 200 nm) complexes.
Materials 13 01183 g003
Materials 13 01183 g004 550
Figure 4. Adsorption-desorption isotherms of N2 of metal complexes.
Figure 4. Adsorption-desorption isotherms of N2 of metal complexes.
Materials 13 01183 g004
Materials 13 01183 g005 550
Figure 5. Pore-volume distribution with pore size of metal complexes.
Figure 5. Pore-volume distribution with pore size of metal complexes.
Materials 13 01183 g005
Materials 13 01183 g006 550
Figure 6. Metal complexes adsorption isotherms of CO2.
Figure 6. Metal complexes adsorption isotherms of CO2.
Materials 13 01183 g006
Table
Table 1. Physical properties and elemental analysis of metal complexes.
Table 1. Physical properties and elemental analysis of metal complexes.
ComplexColorM.P. (°C)Yield (%)Calculated (Found; %)
CHNM
Sn (IV)off white147–1498754.48 (54.46)5.39 (5.33)13.24 (13.23)11.22 (11.21)
Ni (II)blue331–3329059.82 (59.82)6.31 (6.28)14.55 (14.53)6.12 (6.09)
Mg (II)white157–1609262.05 (62.03)6.52 (6.51)15.12 (15.07)2.63 (2.62)
Table
Table 2. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectral data, electronic transition, and conductivity of metal complexes.
Table 2. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectral data, electronic transition, and conductivity of metal complexes.
ComplexWavenumber (cm−1)λ (nm)TransitionConductivity (µS/cm)
C=O SymC=O Asym∆vM–O
Sn (IV)14701735265451264π→π*2.4
Ni (II)14701735265466263, 458π→π*, 3A2g (F)→3T1g (P)2.2
Mg (II)14741732258513263π→π*2.6
Table
Table 3. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectral data for metal complexes.
Table 3. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectral data for metal complexes.
Complex1H-NMR (400 MHz: DMSO-d6, δ, ppm, J in Hz)
Sn (IV)7.69 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.59 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.09–6.97 (m, 8H, Ar), 6.01 (s, exch., 2H, 2 NH), 4.63 (s, 4H, 2 CH2), 4.50 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, 2 CH), 2.28 (m, 2H, 2 CH), 2.09 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H, 2 CH2), 1.46–1.34 (m, 8H, 2 CH2CH2), 0.93 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 12H, 4 Me), 0.77 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H, 2 Me)
Ni (II)7.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.53 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.17–7.95 (m, 8H, Ar), 6.12 (s, exch., 2H, 2 NH), 4.59 (s, 4H, 2 CH2), 4.45 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, 2 CH), 2.27 (m, 2H, 2 CH), 2.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H, 2 CH2), 1.49–1.27 (m, 8H, 2 CH2CH2), 0.90 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 12H, 4 Me), 0.75 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 6H, 2 Me)
Mg (II)7.68 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.51 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.19–7.98 (m, 8H, Ar), 6.03 (s, exch., 2H, 2 NH), 4.61 (s, 4H, 2 CH2), 4.41 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, 2 CH), 2.24 (m, 2H, 2 CH), 2.19 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H, 2 CH2), 1.53–1.37 (m, 8H, 2 CH2CH2), 0.92 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 12H, 4 Me), 0.75 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H, 2 Me)
Table
Table 4. Specific surface area and porosity properties of metal complexes.
Table 4. Specific surface area and porosity properties of metal complexes.
ComplexSBET (m2/g)Pore Volume (cm3/g)Pore Diameter (nm)
Sn (IV) Complex16.630.0116.50
Ni (II) Complex22.750.10812.47
Mg (II) Complex15.960.0277.635
Table
Table 5. Carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake capacity at 323 K and 4 MPa (40 bar) of metal complexes.
Table 5. Carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake capacity at 323 K and 4 MPa (40 bar) of metal complexes.
ComplexCO2 Uptake Capacity
cm3/gmmol/gwt%
Sn (IV) Complex27.371.225.4
Ni (II) Complex34.511.536.8
Mg (II) Complex24.111.074.8
Table
Table 6. CO2 uptake capacity using various adsorbents.
Table 6. CO2 uptake capacity using various adsorbents.
AdsorbentCO2 UptakeConditionReference
mmol/gwt%
Valsartan metal complexes1.536.850 °C, 4 MPaCurrent work
Melamine Schiff bases2.331050 °C, 4 MPa[35]
Polyphosphates containing 1,4-diaminobenzene1.426.050 °C, 4 MPa[36]
Polyphosphates containing benzidine3.661450 °C, 5 MPa[37]
Telmisartan tin complexes1.547.150 °C, 5 MPa[38]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammed, A.; Yousif, E.; El-Hiti, G.A. Synthesis and Use of Valsartan Metal Complexes as Media for Carbon Dioxide Storage. Materials 2020, 13, 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051183

AMA Style

Mohammed A, Yousif E, El-Hiti GA. Synthesis and Use of Valsartan Metal Complexes as Media for Carbon Dioxide Storage. Materials. 2020; 13(5):1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammed, Alaa, Emad Yousif, and Gamal A. El-Hiti. 2020. "Synthesis and Use of Valsartan Metal Complexes as Media for Carbon Dioxide Storage" Materials 13, no. 5: 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051183

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop