Next Article in Journal
Experimental Research on Integrated Disassembly Equipment of Super Large Offshore Oilfield Facilities
Next Article in Special Issue
Preheating Analysis of Semi-Coke in a Circulating Fluidized Bed and Its Kinetic Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Fatigue Life Convergence of Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structure According to Wind Measurement Period
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Investigation on the Impact of Exergy Analysis and Structural Improvement in Power Plant Boiler through Co-Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Micro Power System and Micro Combustion: Present Situation, Techniques and Prospects

1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of the Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
3
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(7), 3201; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073201
Submission received: 17 February 2023 / Revised: 24 March 2023 / Accepted: 30 March 2023 / Published: 1 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Controlling of Combustion Process in Energy and Power Systems)

Abstract

:
Micro burner is the fundamental element of a micro energy power system. The performance, output power, and efficiency of the system are directly involved by the combustion stability, efficiency, and temperature distribution of the exterior wall. Owing to the small combustion space of the micro burner and the resident short time of the premixed fuel/air, the fuel is difficult to burn completely, resulting in poor burning efficiency and flame stability. Therefore, the study of micro burner technology is the focus of current research to improve combustion performance. This article introduces the micro power system, micro combustion technology, and combustion status and characteristics, focusing on four kinds of micro combustion technology. The purpose is tantamount to fully understand the current status of micro combustion technology and compare the characteristics of different combustion technologies. For improving output power and efficiency of the power system, the combustion stability and performance are enhanced, which provides theoretical support for the effective realization of micro scale combustion and application.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of micro machining technology and the demand for portable electronic devices, various micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) are widely adopted [1,2,3]. Epstein and Senturia et al. [4] firstly defined the concept of micro combustion, where the characteristic length scale of confined spaces is on the order of 100–1000 µm. Then, this concept is applied to micro scale devices, and the micro scale equipment has a profound and significant impact on people’s lifestyles and society development [5]. However, these micro power devices are always driven by batteries, while the small/microscale devices are limited by the size of batteries, that is, the power supply is restrained, i.e., durability and power output [6,7]. For instance, 90% of the volume of a microsensor communication device is occupied by batteries [8]. Therefore, these devices urgently need micro energy or a power plant with high energy density [9], so that they can give full play to their advantages and further miniaturization and multifunction [10]. However, the batteries commonly employed in micro electro mechanical systems have some problems, such as long charging time, large size, weight, and low energy density. As shown in Table 1, the energy densities of common batteries and fuels are compared, in which hydrocarbons and hydrogen are several orders of magnitude higher than lithium batteries [11]. In terms of energy conversion efficiency and energy density, micro energy power equipment and micro combustion have a wider application prospect [12]; this is because, compared with the traditional lithium battery power supply system, the system has a higher energy density lighter weight and longer operating time [13].
With the concern of energy depletion and environmental damage and the strong demand for portable electronic equipment, hydrocarbon-fueled micro burner has become an important research field and has broad application prospects [14]. As illustrated in Figure 1, the chemical energy released by fuel can be utilized in four ways [11,14]: ① Self-heat source; ② Thermal energy converts electrical energy, such as micro thermophotovoltaic system (Micro-TPV)/micro thermoelectric generator (Micro-TEG); ③ Conversion of thermal energy into chemical energy, serving as a heat source in multifunctional reactors (e.g., methane catalytic reforming/ammonia to hydrogen); ④ Converting thermal energy into mechanical energy, such as Micro Propeller, Micro Rotary Engine, and Micro Gas Turbine Engine. The micro combustors, as the core components of micro energy power systems (micromotors and power electrical systems), have been put forward higher requirements for working stability and sustainability: stable and continuous supply of high-temperature heat sources, high energy density, low noise exhaust pollution, high safety [3,15,16], etc. It should be noted that the operation of a micro burner also brings great challenges because of the narrow combustion space, large surface volume ratio, and heat dissipation ratio [17]. Besides, research on micro combustion integrates the scientific and technological knowledge and achievements of micro machinery, fluid, aerodynamics, heat transfer, and thermodynamics in micro devices [18,19]. Its in-depth understanding and development will also drive the progress of these related disciplines.
The burning stability and energy efficiency immediately impact the performance of the system [20]. However, the resident time of combustion in the micro cavity is shortened sharply due to the small combustion chamber [21]. So, it is difficult to ensure the complete heat release of fuel, and the enhanced surface-to-volume ratio and serious heat loss reduce the flame stability, combustion efficiency, and energy utilization efficiency in the micro power systems [22,23]. These reasons will lead to a reduction in limited stable combustion, incomplete burning, and decrease in efficiency, thus reducing the adjustable range of the output power and efficiency of the micro power system, increasing the emission of pollutants [24,25]. This brings new challenges to the micro energy power system.
Micro combustion is widely employed, while the unstable flame, inadequate combustion, and high heat loss ratio challenge the application. To improve the output power and efficiency of the micro system, approaches to enhance combustion stability and thermal performance are adopted. In this work, the micro power system and combustion are overviewed, where the main application is introduced. Then, the methods of enhanced combustion stability are compared and summarized, such as blended fuels, catalytic, and porous media combustion and burner optimization. Finally, the prospects for micro combustion are concluded and expected.

2. Micro Power System and Combustion

2.1. Micro Power Generation

The main application of the micro energy system is to employ hydrocarbon-fueled combustion to release heat in micro devices, and then output high-density power via energy conversion [26,27]. Research efforts have been made regarding a micro power system; i.e., burner structure design and system optimization, and various forms of micro heat engine systems, are designed and proposed [11,28]. Epstein et al. [29,30] firstly devised a three-layer, silicon-based micro gas turbine engine in 1997. Then, Waitz et al. [31] manufactured a micro gas turbine engine with six layers of silicon in 2000. Besides, a miniature burner (silicon-based) is developed with hydrogen, ethylene, propane, and other gases fueled [18,32]. Furthermore, the power output of these gas turbines is 6 to 8 orders of magnitude less than that of conventional macroscopic scale turbines [33]. It usually produces hundreds of megawatts of power, while the volume of the combustion chamber is less than 200 mm3. However, power density exceeds 1000 MW/m3, which possesses high utilization potentiality [34,35,36]. Besides, Zhang et al. [37] tested a micro power generation system powered by a circumferential pulse micro turbine.
A micro thermoelectric system, the main application of micro power generation, adopts PV/TEG cells to convert thermoelectric energy to electrical power [38], as depicted in Figure 2. The system is mainly composed of a micro burner and thermoelectric conversion module without moving parts. Sitikz et al. [39] designed a “Mier-FIRE” miniature thermoelectric system with a Swiss roll combustor. Vican et al. [40] made a micro power device by using Swiss roll structure and alumina ceramics, which can convert heat into electric energy. When the fuel chemical energy output is 6.8~9.1 W, the electric energy output of 30~500 MW can be obtained. Schaevita et al. [41] obtained a stable voltage of 7 V by using platinum to catalyze the burning of hydrogen/air in a micro combustion chamber. Yoshida et al. [42] proposed a micro thermoelectric system composed of a catalytic burner with butane-fueled combustion and a thermal generator. When the fuel input is 6.6 W, the maximum output power and total efficiency are 184 mW and 2.8%, respectively. In particularly, the micro-TPV system is a typical micro thermoopticalelectric device, which is widely employed and studied in micro power sources [43]. Chou and Yang et al. [44,45,46] have conducted hydrogen-fueled combustion under micro conditions and developed a micro-TPV system, which consists of a micro burner, filter, PV cell, and heat fins, obtaining a power output of 1–2 W. Besides, Meng et al. [47] optimized a novel micro power generation system by coupling micro-TPV and micro-TEG, where two GaSb PV cells are applied to convert high radiation temperature and two Bi-Te modules are employed to utilize the medium wall temperature. The results showed that a system efficiency of 2.5% can be achieved. For the conversion of thermal to photoelectric, the high radiation temperature and the area–volume ratio of the micro burner can achieve high radiation power [48,49].

2.2. Micro Combustion Characteristics

Compared with conventional combustors, the structural size of a micro burner at the millimeter or submillimeter level brings challenges to the design and manufacture [50]. It also challenges combustion in micro conditions. For instance, the viscous effects are enhanced at small size channels, the physical residence time of mixed gas is shortened, and the ratio of area–volume of the combustion chamber increases sharply [51,52]. These factors directly/indirectly affect the flame and heat release of chemical energy, which makes combustion characteristics in micro/conventional combustors greatly different.
(1)
Short residence time
Micro combustion is determined by diffusion time and reaction time due to the small volume of the chamber; that is, the residence time is short [53]. It is proportional to the volume and pressure of the combustion chamber. For example, the reaction time of hydrogen or hydrocarbon with air/O2 is about 0.01~0.001 s, which is placed on the same order of magnitude under the condition of small scale [54]. Hence, the Damköhler number Da, the ratio of the residence time τr of the mixture to the combustion time τc, is employed. It indicates whether the fuel is completely combusted in the combustor, and can be defined as [55,56]:
D a = τ r τ c
when Da < 1, the reaction time is longer than the residence time of the mixture and the incomplete fuel is blown out, which reduces the combustion efficiency and results in the low efficiency of the power generation [57]. So, the reduction of the burner scale has more restrictions on the reaction time and residence time.
(2)
High heat loss ratio
The heat loss ratio of the combustor can be given [58]:
q & = Q m = s q & d S V ρ d V = q & ¯ ρ ¯ = ( S V )
where, q& is heat loss density,  q & ¯  is the average heat loss density, S is the inner surface area of the combustor, and V is the chamber volume.
Besides, the hydraulic diameter of a burner can also be employed to compare the combustion heat release rate and the heat dissipation rate:
E E 1 d h 1.2
where, E′ is the mixture combustion heat release rate, E′′ is the heat dissipation rate of the inner wall, and dh is the interior wall heat dissipation rate.
With the decrease of combustion chamber size under micro scale, the surface-to-volume ratio S/V increases rapidly. According to Equations (2) and (3), the heat loss ratio of combustor is significantly increased with the reduction of burner size, i.e., the smaller of dh, which also accelerates the heat dissipation of the inner wall. For a conventional burner, the surface-to-volume ratio is approximately 3~5 m−1, while it reaches 500 m−1 under the micro condition of the combustor [59,60]. Hence, the surface heat loss of the micro combustor is a key problem for the application.
(3)
Weak flame stability
The stability of micro combustion is mainly determined by the reactions process, heat transfer, and the interaction of burned/unburned gas in the chamber [61,62]. Factors, i.e., fields of flow, temperature, and species, affect the flame stability, which is more susceptible in the microchannel, resulting in combustion instability: flame blowout, flame oscillations, and apparently asymmetrical distribution [63,64,65]. Glassman et al. [66] defined the extinction distance as the maximum inner diameter of the burner without flame flashback. The quenching distances of premixed combustion of hydrogen/hydrocarbon are presented in Table 2, which can be measured in a constant volume combustor [67]. In addition, the high heat loss ratio of combustor walls can also easily lead to non-self-sustaining combustion: thermal extinction or radical extinction in a small chamber [68]. In particular, radical extinction is mainly caused by the inner wall, which absorbs the active energy of radicals and makes it difficult to react. So, external wall heating is proposed to enhance flame stability [69]. Furthermore, the larger surface-to-volume ratio increases the wall heat loss and collision probability of radicals to the inner wall in unit volume; so, the mentioned two mechanisms of flame extinction both affect the micro power system [70,71]. This is because the quenching distance of micro combustion is very small and close to the burner scale, as exhibited in Table 2.

2.3. Summary

The micro-combustion-based generator, which gains a higher energy density and longer duration with simple structure, light weight, and small size [72], is considered to be one of the most promising candidates for the power sources of micro devices [73]. However, the applications of the micro burner are limited by shortcomings, i.e., high heat loss ratio and weak flame stability, etc. The micro chamber volume and the dramatic augment of the surface-to-volume ratio affect the burning process and flame stability in three respects [74,75,76]. So, approaches should be proposed to enhance flame stability, heat transmission, and extend the application of micro combustion.

3. Research Actuality of Micro Combustion

3.1. Fuel Selection and Blended Combustion

Research on micro combustion is mainly focused on optimizing the fuel/air mixing process, strengthening flame stability, and improving the radiation temperature of micro burner [77,78,79]. As mentioned in Section 2, fuel properties strongly affect flame stability in micro combustors. Yilmaz et al. [80] and Chen et al. [81,82] found optimizing the fuel/air mixing process can prolong the residence time of gas and increase the flame temperature, which can improve the burning efficiency. Hydrogen is the most valuable fuel in micro burning because of the combustible wide range, high energy density, and lack of NOx emissions [83,84]. However, hydrogen-fueled combustion is close to the combustor inlet, resulting in the high radiation temperature locates at the burner upstream and the temperature gradient is also remarkable, which is not conducive to device power output and the reliability of the system [85,86]. An effective method is the addition of other hydrocarbon fuel to alter the reaction processes and flame propagation [87]. Law and Kwon et al. [88] pointed out that adding an appropriate amount of propane to hydrogen-fueled burning can significantly inhibit the hydrodynamic instability of the flame and thermal diffusion. Furthermore, the addition of hydrogen to hydrocarbon also improves the stability of combustion and adjusts the flame anchoring position in the combustion chamber [89]. For example, adding a 10~20% molar concentration of hydrogen to the mixture of methane/air [90], propane/air [91] and carbon monoxide/air [92] can improve the energy conversion efficiency of premixed combustion. Obviously, changing the combustion characteristics, reducing the limit of flame quenching, and improving the burning stability are effective approaches to enhance micro combustion [52,93,94].
A small amount of hydrogen/hydrocarbon addition promotes the combustion in the micro burner via the additional radicals [95,96]. Pan et al. [95] found that hydrogen can expand the flammability of propane. When propane-fueled combustion is blended with 20% hydrogen, the blow-off limit can reach 1.4 m/s. As exhibited in Figure 3, Peng et al. [96] compared the combustion performance of methane/propane/hydrogen-mixed fuel, and found that the premixed combustion with 7.5% methane obtained the best thermal performance, while the 5% propane blended combustion gained the highest radiation temperature. As shown in Figure 4, Wang et al. [97] researched the effect of hydrogenation on the burning of methane/air mixture, and found that the addition of a small amount of hydrogen to methane and propane promotes the formation of OH radicals and effectively inhibits the deflagration. It also improves flame stability and reduces the formation of NOx, reducing environmental pollution [98,99]. Moreover, blended burning in micro combustors enhances flame stabilization and improves emitter heat performance without the optimization of chamber setting [100].

3.2. Catalytic Combustion

As mentioned in Section 2, the adsorption of free radicals on the inner wall and the high heat loss rate challenge the ignition and stable propagation of micro burning [101,102]. Research shows that catalytic combustion is an effective means of enhancing the combustion in a micro burner [103,104]. Figure 5 depicts the reaction process of catalytic combustion. Catalytic combustion can effectively reduce the ignition temperature (290–450 °C [105]), improve energy conversion efficiency, and broaden the combustion limit, which also reduces the generation of NOx [106,107]. Furthermore, the heat conductivity and specific thermal capacity of the catalyst are much higher than that of gas, which is conducive to the thermal transmission of the gas wall and can effectively preheat the mixture and strengthen the flame stability [108,109]. For catalytic combustion, the catalyst adsorbs the gas, which is diffused to the catalytic surface, affecting the homogeneous reactions [83,110]. To explore the effects of surface catalytic (heterogeneous reaction [111]) on gas reaction in detail, Karagiannidis et al. [112] studied the combustion limit of methane/air with Pt catalyst under various pressures. The results showed that the limit of combustion stability is extended and the intensities of heterogeneous/homogeneous reactions are both enhanced, when pressure increases from 1 bar to 5 bar. Chen et al. [113] compared the catalytic combustion of methane/air in a micro combustor with single/multi channels, as shown in Figure 6. The results show that thermal recycling can lead to a substantial improvement in stability, but this excess enthalpy effect only occurs in high insulating materials [114]. Thermal recycling strongly affects the blowout, but has little effect on the extinction.
Harmful gases are produced in micro combustion with some new or hybrid fuels, such as NH3, where CO, NOx, and HCs can be formed under some operating conditions [115]. For example, NOx is sensitive to operating temperature, and the high temperature is conducive to the formation of NOx [116]. Figure 7 depicts the formation routes of NOx, which can be formed via the process of fuel consumption, thermal process, and instantaneous process. For the reduction of NOx, methods of setting catalysts [84], a perforated plate [25], and increasing the hydrogen content [117] can be employed. For instance, the application of a catalyst can reduce the residence time of burning reactions and form a low concentration of NOx. The perforated plate in the combustor is mainly employed to form a hot recirculation area in the combustor, where a low concentration of NOx gas is produced in the low temperature flame region near the perforated plate [118]. Besides, adding hydrogen is mainly related to the large amount of H and O that promotes the formation of NO, and the high H2 content leads to the reduction of NH3 and N radical, which is beneficial to reduce the production of NO [64]. Moreover, the mixing of hydrogen and ammonia to reduce NOx emissions has great application potential in practical applications.
Catalytic combustion can achieve efficient lean burning at a low temperature by reducing reaction time and increasing residence time [42,120]. For the lower requirement of activation energy of catalytic combustion, fuels can be ignited with a lower initial temperature even under micro conditions [121]. Zhang et al. and Yan et al. [122,123] found that the employment of platinum as a catalyst can effectively expand the combustion limit at lean combustion. As shown in Figure 8, the catalyst structure and the application of catalytic methane combustion are presented, which is a hot spot for research on combustion. Reinke et al. [124] verified the homogeneous reaction mechanism of methane/air with catalyst Pt at 1–16 bar, and evaluated the effectiveness of various basic gas-phase reaction mechanisms. Besides, the importance of the gas-phase reaction mechanism to catalytic combustion is provided. Li et al. [125] confirmed the feasibility of asymmetric catalytic of micro burner for non-premixed combustion, and the peak surface radiation efficiency reached 25.9%. Ran et al. [126] studied the catalytic combustion of CH4/O2 in a micro channel with a height of 1 mm and a length of 1 mm. Besides, Namazi et al. [127] proposed a pore-scale simulation method to study the catalytic methane combustion in the fiber porous, and found that it can predict the temperature distribution and the methane conversion rate with a relative error of 6.4%.
Catalytic combustion can reduce the initial temperature of burning and improve the combustion limits and efficiency [104,128]. However, a catalyst will lose its functions due to the poisoning and cannot guarantee a long-term effect because of the catalytic shedding or sintering [129]. Furthermore, it may also cause material failure due to uneven thermal stress between various parts of the combustion device. So, one of the key points of catalytic combustion is to develop efficient catalysts, find efficient loading materials, and design reasonable burners.

3.3. Combustor Optimization

For micro-TPV systems and other micro power generators, the temperature distribution of the burner surface affects the power output and system efficiency [130]. Furthermore, heat loss is also a key issue in a micro combustor, affecting the combustion stability and system working performance. Weinberg et al. [131] firstly proposed the excessive enthalpy combustion, where heat from reactions preheats the unburnt gas via the burner wall, improving the enthalpy value of reactants and expanding the flammability limit. Hua et al. [132] also depicted that heat conduction in the combustion chamber contributes to the flame stability of hydrogen/air in micro combustors and reduces the heat loss of the system. Leach et al. [133] investigated the effects of the axial thermal conduction of burner wall and heat loss caused by the environment on hydrogen/air burning in micro tubes. It is found that the gradually enhanced heat conduction of the wall is beneficial to the stability of combustion and the improvement of energy density. Veeraragavan et al. [134] analyzed the effect of axial heat conduction on the temperature distribution of micro combustor and flame velocity of methane/air, and illuminated that the flame regime is relocated and flame velocity is changed due to the heat conduction between the wall and preheating zone in the combustion chamber. Pan et al. [135] researched the effects of the ratio of wall thickness to burner diameter on H2/O2 combustion, and found that the thin wall is beneficial to the reduction of axial heat loss. Besides, Wang et al. [136] demonstrated that the continuous preheating of the combustor outer wall via the blowing of warm air leads to stabilizing the flame and increasing the flammable limits.
The selection of appropriate material and thickness of the burner wall is another important aspect of micro burning [137]. Obviously, the appropriate thickness of the burner’s outer wall directly impacts the flame stability and the utilization of the heat generated by reactions in a micro combustor, affecting the radiation temperature and system power output [138,139]. The wall properties, i.e., heat conductivity and emissivity, also affect the heat transfer through the burner wall [140,141,142]. High thermal conductivity can increase the radiation temperature of the burner while reducing the stability of the flame [143]. This is because the heat transfer from the inner wall to unburned completely gas is conducive to preheating the mixture, maintaining stable combustion, and improving the reaction intensity [144,145]. Therefore, it is necessary to select suitable heat conductivity of the burner to gain higher radiation efficiency and large power output [87,88].
For improving combustion stabilization and energy efficiency of a micro combustor, efforts and investigations are conducted, where the combustor with various chamber settings is proposed, as indicated in Table 3. Obviously, modification of the combustion chamber alters the flow field of gas, affecting the preheating of unburnt reactants, the flame anchoring, distribution of radicals, and temperature; the chamber setting includes a cavity, step, and multichannels [146,147,148]. Setting ribs, baffles, and bluff body with an appropriate position can change the internal flow field of a micro combustor, producing a backflow zone and a low-speed region near the wall [149]. It effectively prolongs the local residence time and enhances the mixing performance of radicals, improving flame stabilization and burning efficiency [150]. Lee et al. [151] studied the flame dynamics of lean hydrogen/air burning in a narrow channel with a bluff body, and found that the bluff body can effectively maintain flame stability under the condition of subcritical velocity. Niu et al. [152] investigated the methane/air burning limit in a micro channel with five trapezoidal bluff body at an equivalence ratio of 0.9. The results illustrated that four types of the flow field successively appeared with the increase of blockage ratio and inlet velocity in the combustion chamber. Besides, Wan et al. [153] found that the bluff body can extend the combustion limit of premixed hydrogen/air by 3–5 times in a micro planar. Yan et al. [154] showed that the blocking ratio between bluff body and chamber size also strongly affects flame stability. Bagheri et al. [62] also simulated the combustion characteristics and flame stability of premixed H2/air in the micro burner with bluff body (shapes of round, oval, diamond, semicircular, semi-oval, triangle, crescent, arrow, and wall blades), and found that the blowout limit, combustion efficiency, wall temperature, and emission temperature of the combustion chambers are dramatically changed [155]. As depicted in Figure 9, the tensile effect in the shear layer of the micro combustor with triangular and semicircular bluff bodies causes the flame blowout, and the triangular bluff body has stronger dynamics effects than that of the semicircular bluff body on flame stretch [156].
The optimization of a fluid field in a combustor usually provides a thermal recirculation zone, which is considered to be the most critical factor affecting the burning process [164,165,166], as shown in Figure 10. It reduces the quenching diameter and increases the combustion temperature because of thermal recycling; moreover, the reaction time can be extended and the flammability limit can be increased [148,167]. Yang et al. [168] discovered that setting a backward-facing step in a miniature stainless steel tube is a simple and effective approach to enhancing combustion stability. It creates a low-velocity zone and provides a region for flame anchors [169], thereby prolonging the residence time of reactants, expanding the flow range and operating condition, so a high and uniform temperature distribution of the external wall can be achieved. Li et al. [170,171] demonstrated that the expansion section of micro tube can effectively stabilize the flame position, and the appropriate length of the expansion section or the step position is conducive to increasing the burner wall [172]. Besides, Yang et al. [73] learned the average outer wall temperature of a micro burner with heat recovery is 123 K better than that of a micro combustor without thermal recuperation, as shown in Figure 11. Hosseini and Taywade [62,114] found that internal thermal recovery can enhance the heat quenching limit, while external thermal recirculation obtains a better burner radiation efficiency; the expansion of the recirculation zone also increases burning efficiency. More structural forms are also employed to form reflux zone in a micro combustor, such as Swiss roll [173,174] and U-Bend [175,176]. Zhong et al. [177] conducted a methane/air combustion test on a miniature Swiss roll, and found that the thermal recirculation in the combustor center can effectively preheat reactants and enhance the combustion. Besides, the equivalence ratio and the initial temperature of reactants also significantly affect the thermal recirculation in the combustion chamber [170,178].

3.4. Porous Media Combustion

Combustion in porous media is an efficient regenerative burning technology without a heat exchanger and energy auxiliary peripherals [179]. The heat capacity, heat storage, thermal conductivity, and emissivity of the solid skeleton of porous media are higher than that of gas [180,181], which can strongly boost the heat transmission of gas–gas and gas–wall in combustor [182]. As exhibited in Figure 12, the released heat of fuel is effectively transferred to the porous media zone, where the solid skeleton of porous media can be rapidly heated up, preheating the unburned gas at upstream [183,184]. Besides, the high heat storage and heat capacity can also contribute to the thermal transmission of burning gas to unburned gas through gas–solid [185]. So, as shown in Figure 13, the burning intensity, combustion limit, and output power can be improved by adding porous media in the micro combustor [186].
There exists a significant difference between the burning with/without porous media because of the heat recirculation [187], as depicted in Figure 14. The setting of porous media in a micro burner can effectively improve flame stability and thermal transmission by utilizing the high radiation and thermal conductivity of the solid skeleton of porous media [188,189]. Li et al. [142] found that porous media can strengthen the heat transmission between the gas and the wall surface, where it can also be regarded as a solid matrix for burning in a micro combustor. Besides, the burning efficiency can also be enhanced in a micro burner. Liu et al. [184] demonstrated that the combustion efficiency in the porous media is close to 100%, owing to the strong thermal recycling effect via solid skeleton. Besides, the porous medium significantly boosts the thermal recirculation and transfer in a combustor, which contributes to obtaining a stable flame near the combustion limit [190], thereby extending the lean burn limit of hydrocarbon [184,191]. This is because the combustion characteristics and flame propagation are also strongly modified. Voss et al. [192] learned that the flame thickness of burning in porous media is thicker than that of free flame. Shi et al. [193] found that the diffusion of the reaction component in porous media leads to an increase in flame width and a decrease in flame height. Liu et al. [194] indicated that the temperature distribution of gas and porous media are significantly changed with the increase of porous media in emissivity. Burning in porous media can transfer the reaction heat to other regions of the combustion chamber, reducing the flame temperature and increasing the upstream and downstream temperatures of the burner, thereby improving the radiation temperature and energy efficiency of the micro burner [72,195,196]. Pan et al. [197] improved the flame stability, burning efficiency, and system efficiency of micro-TPV by adding porous media to a micro combustor. Research from Li et al. [198] and Peng et al. [199] demonstrated that the width, filling position, porosity, and particle size of porous media strongly affect flame stability, combustion characteristics, and combustion efficiency, thereby impacting the heat and working performance of micro power system, as shown in Figure 15.
To sum up, porous media with a high capacity of heat storage and regenerative performance can preheat unburned gas and improve thermal transmission in a combustor. So, flame stability, the flammable limit of hydrocarbon, and combustion efficiency can be prominently improved, which contributes to the miniaturization of burners and micro devices.

3.5. Summary

Methods to enhance micro combustion stabilization are introduced and compared, which gains various characteristics for combustion under different operating conditions. Premixed combustion utilizes free radicals to promote combustion and improve flame stability, while the probably-toxic gases in the exhaust gas should be reduced, such as mixed ammonia, hydrogen-oxygen, etc. Catalytic combustion is mainly adopted to reduce the reaction time and maintain a stable flame. Besides, the optimization of chamber structure forms the regions of backflow, and low velocity enhances the heat transfer of gas-gas and preheating, promoting flame anchoring and improving combustion efficiency. Table 3 summarizes the optimization of the burner structure, inserting blunt body and block, setting cavity, changing channel shape, etc. For the approaches of burner optimization, a higher wall temperature and energy conversion efficiency can be obtained. Meanwhile, the effects of chamber setting on combustion stability and flame stretch are varied, so the combination of these means is also employed to improve the micro combustion and system performance. Furthermore, the combustion of porous media improves the heat transmission of gas–gas and gas–wall, enhancing flame stability and boosting the radiation temperature of burner. Besides, the emerging methods of fire stabilization are adopted, such as hyperenthalpy combustion. So, the development of new (economic, safe, efficient) combustion technology is still needed to extend the application of micro combustion.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

A micro energy power generator is urgently needed because of the development of micro machining technology and the demand for portable devices. As the core element of the micro power resource, micro burning has the advantages of lightweight, high energy density, and long working duration. However, the narrow combustion chamber, large surface-to-volume ratio, and high heat dissipation ratio have brought great challenges to combustion stability, limit, operating range, thermal efficiency, and power output of the micro generator. In view of the above problems and challenges, research has been carried out to reduce the limitation of the characteristic dimension of flame quenching and improve combustion stability and efficiency, where the burner structural optimization, porous medium, catalytic, blended combustion, etc., are proposed. To provide strong support for efficiency improvement, burner optimization and processing design of micro energy power devices are employed. It can be further investigated from the following aspects:
(1)
Low–zero carbon fuels and liquid fuels can be adopted to meet the requirements of the emissions target and the miniaturization of equipment, where the combustion with blended fuels, such as NH3/H2, is recommended.
(2)
New combustion technology can be employed to solve the problem of incomplete combustion and short residence time, such as porous media catalytic combustion, and an efficient catalyst should be employed.
(3)
Combustor optimization still plays an important role in flame stability and combustion efficiency, where new materials with appropriate thermal properties and novel designs of the chamber structure are proposed, such as multi-inlets and combined burners.
(4)
For high energy density and power output, a combination of power generation technologies should be employed, such as the coupling of TPV and TEG. The new simple and efficient stable burning in micro combustors is the advantage of wide application of micro power systems.

Author Contributions

Z.K.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing-Original Draft, Investigation, Writing-Review & Editing. Z.S.: Writing—Original Draft, Writing-Review & Editing. J.Y.: Writing-Review & Editing. X.T.: Writing-Review & Editing. Z.H.: Writing—Review & Editing. H.W.: Writing-Review & Editing. D.W.: Writing-Review & Editing. Q.P.: Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing—Review & Editing. Y.T.: Resources, Project administration, Writing—Review & Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Special Post Fund [2020]14 and [2019]21 of Guizhou University.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

Abbreviations
MEMSmicro electro mechanical systems
TPVthermophotovoltaic
TEGthermoelectric generator
SCRselective catalytic reduction
adthe adsorption
Symbols
ECthe input chemical energy
Φthe equivalence ratio
Dathe Damköhler number
Τrthe residence time
Τcthe combustion time
q& the heat loss density
q & ¯ the average heat loss density
Sthe inner surface area of combustor
Vthe chamber volume
E′the mixture combustion heat release rate
E″the heat dissipation rate of the inner wall
dhthe interior wall heat dissipation rate
Rthe route
Vfthe fuel rate
Vinthe inlet velocity
mHthe mass flow rate of H2

References

  1. Chou, S.K.; Yang, W.M.; Chua, K.J.; Li, J.; Zhang, K.L. Development of micro power generators—A review. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ju, Y.; Maruta, K. Microscale combustion: Technology development and fundamental research. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2011, 37, 669–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maruta, K. Micro and mesoscale combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 125–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Epstein, A.H.; Senturia, S.D. Macro Power from Micro Machinery. Science 1997, 276, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, Z.; Zuo, Z.; Wang, W.; Liu, R.; Kuang, N. Performance optimization for a combustion-based micro thermoelectric generator with two-stage thermoelectric module. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 198, 117464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aravind, B.; Raghuram, G.K.S.; Kishore, V.R.; Kumar, S. Compact design of planar stepped micro combustor for portable thermoelectric power generation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 156, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, L.; Tian, Q.; Zou, C.; Huang, J.; Ye, Y.; Wu, X. A study on energy distribution strategy of electric vehicle hybrid energy storage system considering driving style based on real urban driving data. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 162, 112416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xie, B.; Peng, Q.; Yang, W.; Li, S.; Jiaqiang, E.; Li, Z.; Tao, M.; Zhang, A. Effect of pins and exit-step on thermal performance and energy efficiency of hydrogen-fueled combustion for micro-thermophotovoltaic. Energy 2022, 239, 122341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Galazutdinova, Y.; Al-Hallaj, S.; Grageda, M.; Ushak, S. Development of the inorganic composite phase change materials for passive thermal management of Li-ion batteries: Material characterization. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 2011–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ansari, M.; Amani, E. Micro-combustor performance enhancement using a novel combined baffle-bluff configuration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 175, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaisare, N.S.; Vlachos, D.G. A review on microcombustion: Fundamentals, devices and applications. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 321–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Utlu, Z.; Parali, U. Investigation of the potential of thermophotovoltaic heat recovery for the Turkish industrial sector. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 74, 308–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Pan, J.; Lu, Z.; Tang, A.; Zhu, Y.; Bani, S. The characteristics of pure heterogeneous reaction for H2/Air mixture in the micro-combustors with different thermophysical properties. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 141, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fernandez-Pello, A.C. Micropower generation using combustion: Issues and approaches. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 29, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ganji, H.B.; Ebrahimi, R. Numerical estimation of blowout, flashback, and flame position in MIT micro gas-turbine chamber. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 104, 857–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jejurkar, S.Y.; Mishra, D.P. A review of recent patents on micro-combustion and applications. Recent Pat. Eng. 2009, 3, 194–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peng, Q.; Xie, B.; Yang, W.; Tang, S.; Li, Z.; Zhou, P.; Luo, N. Effects of porosity and multilayers of porous medium on the hydrogen-fueled combustion and micro-thermophotovoltaic. Renew. Energy 2021, 174, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mehra, A.; Ayón, A.A.; Waitz, I.A.; Schmidt, M.A. Microfabrication of high-temperature silicon devices using wafer bonding and deep reactive ion etching. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 1999, 8, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lee, K.; Hong, Y.; Kim, K.; Kwon, O. Stability limits of premixed microflames at elevated temperatures for portable fuel processing devices. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pourali, M.; Esfahani, J.A.; Fanaee, S.A.; Bastiaans, R.J.M.; Kim, K.C. Effect of hydrogen addition on conjugate heat transfer in a planar micro-combustor with the detailed reaction mechanism: An analytical approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 15425–15440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, Q.; Wu, Y.; Jiaqiang, E.; Yang, W.; Xu, H.; Li, Z. Combustion characteristics and thermal performance of premixed hydrogen-air in a two-rearward-step micro tube. Appl. Energy 2019, 242, 424–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Holladay, J.D.; Wang, Y. A review of recent advances in numerical simulations of microscale fuel processor for hydrogen production. J. Power Sources 2015, 282, 602–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chia, L.C.; Feng, B. The development of a micropower (micro-thermophotovoltaic) device. J. Power Sources 2007, 165, 455–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, C.; Yan, Y.; Shen, K.; Gao, W.; He, Z.; Xue, Z.; Li, J. Numerical study on combustion characteristics and heat transfer enhancement of the micro combustor embedded with Y-shaped fin for micro thermo-photovoltaic system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 211, 118427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cai, T.; Zhao, D.; Sun, Y.; Ni, S.; Li, W.; Guan, D.; Wang, B. Evaluation of NO emissions characteristics in a CO2-Free micro-power system by implementing a perforated plate. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ababneh, H.; Hameed, B.H. Electrofuels as emerging new green alternative fuel: A review of recent literature. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 254, 115213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Capurso, T.; Stefanizzi, M.; Torresi, M.; Camporeale, S.M. Perspective of the role of hydrogen in the 21st century energy transition. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 251, 114898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, L.; Li, H.; Yi, P.; Huang, J.; Lin, M.; Wang, H. Investigation on AEB Key Parameters for Improving Car to Two-Wheeler Collision Safety Using In-Depth Traffic Accident Data. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 72, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Epstein, A.; Senturia, S.; Al-Midani, O.; Anathasuresh, G.; Ayon, A.; Breuer, K.; Chen, K.S.; Ehrich, F.; Esteve, E.; Frechette, L.; et al. Micro-heat engines, gas turbines, and rocket engines—The MIT microengine project. In Proceedings of the 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO, USA, 29 June–2 July 1997. [Google Scholar]
  30. Spadaccini, C.M.; Zhang, X.; Cadou, C.P.; Miki, N.; Waitz, I.A. Preliminary development of a hydrocarbon-fueled catalytic micro-combustor. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2003, 103, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mehra, A.; Zhang, X.; Ayón, A.A.; Waitz, I.A.; Schmidt, M.A.; Spadaccini, C.M. A six-wafer combustion system for a silicon micro gas turbine engine. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2000, 9, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Menon, S.; Cadou, C.P. Scaling of Miniature Piston-Engine Performance, Part 1: Overall Engine Performance. J. Propuls. Power 2013, 29, 774–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sakurai, T.; Yuasa, S.; Honda, T.; Shimotori, S. Heat loss reduction and hydrocarbon combustion in ultra-micro combustors for ultra-micro gas turbines. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32, 3067–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bai, J.; Wang, Q.; He, Z.; Li, C.; Pan, J. Study on methane HCCI combustion process of micro free-piston power device. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 73, 1066–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fan, B.W.; Pan, J.F.; Pan, Z.H.; Tang, A.K.; Zhu, Y.J.; Xue, H. Effects of pocket shape and ignition slot locations on the combustion processes of a rotary engine fueled with natural gas. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 89, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Bai, J.; He, Z. Numerical simulation of catalysis combustion inside micro free-piston engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 113, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, L.; Tang, G.Z.; Liao, Z.B.; Shang, H.C. Development and experimental research on circumferential impulse microturbine power generation system. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2013, 228, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mustafa, K.F.; Abdullah, S.; Abdullah, M.Z.; Sopian, K. A review of combustion-driven thermoelectric (TE) and thermophotovoltaic (TPV) power systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sitzki, L.; Borer, K.; Wussow, S.; Maruta, E.; Ronney, P. Combustion in microscale heat-recirculating burners. In Proceedings of the 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 8–11 January 2001. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vican, J.G.B.F.; Gajdeczko, B.F.; Dryer, F.L.; Milius, D.L.; Aksay, I.A.; Yetter, R.A. Development of a microreactor as a thermal source for microelectromechanical systems power generation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 29, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schaevitz, S.B.; Franz, A.J.; Jensen, K.F.; Schmidt, M.A. A combustion-based MEMS thermoelectric power generator. In Transducers’ 01 Eurosensors XV; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; pp. 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yoshida, K.; Tanaka, S.; Tomonari, S.; Satoh, D.; Esashi, M. High-Energy Density Miniature Thermoelectric Generator Using Catalytic Combustion. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2006, 15, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jiang, D.Y.; Yang, W.M.; Tang, A.K. Development of a high-temperature and high-uniformity micro planar combustor for thermophotovoltaics application. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 103, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, W.M.; Chou, S.K.; Li, J. Microthermophotovoltaic power generator with high power density. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2009, 29, 3144–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, W.; Chou, S.; Chua, K.; An, H.; Karthikeyan, K.; Zhao, X. An advanced micro modular combustor-radiator with heat recuperation for micro-TPV system application. Appl. Energy 2012, 97, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, W.M.; Jiang, D.Y.; Chou, S.K.; Chua, K.J.; Karthikeyan, K.; An, H. Experimental study on micro modular combustor for micro-thermophotovoltaic system application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 9576–9583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meng, L.; Li, J.; Li, Q. A miniaturized power generation system cascade utilizing thermal energy of a micro-combustor: Design and modelling. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 17275–17283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Amani, E.; Daneshgar, A.; Hemmatzade, A. A novel combined baffle-cavity micro-combustor configuration for Micro-Thermo-Photo-Voltaic applications. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 28, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Burger, T.; Sempere, C.; Roy-Layinde, B.; Lenert, A. Present Efficiencies and Future Opportunities in Thermophotovoltaics. Joule 2020, 4, 1660–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hossain, A.; Nakamura, Y. Thermal and chemical structures formed in the micro burner of miniaturized hydrogen-air jet flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2015, 35, 3413–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Glassman, I.; Yetter, R.A.; Glumac, N.G. Flame phenomena in premixed combustible gases. In Combustion; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 147–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Q.Q.; Wang, J.S.; Meng, L.; Li, J.; Guo, Z.L. CFD study on stability limits of hydrogen/air premixed flames in planar micro-combustors with catalytic walls. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 121, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yun, T.M.; Kottke, P.A.; Anderson, D.M.; Fedorov, A.G. Experimental investigation of hydrogen production by variable volume membrane batch reactors with modulated liquid fuel introduction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 2601–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, M.J.; Cho, S.M.; Choi, B.I.; Kim, N.I. Scale and material effects on flame characteristics in small heat recirculation combustors of a counter-current channel type. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2010, 30, 2227–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tu, Y.; Liu, H.; Yang, W. Flame Characteristics of CH4/H2 on a Jet-in-Hot-Coflow Burner Diluted by N2, CO2, and H2O. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 3270–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mohan, S.; Matalon, M. Diffusion flames and diffusion flame-streets in three dimensional micro-channels. Combust. Flame 2017, 177, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Feldmeier, S.; Schwarz, M.; Wopienka, E.; Pfeifer, C. Categorization of small-scale biomass combustion appliances by characteristic numbers. Renew. Energy 2021, 163, 2128–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, J.W.; Zhong, B.J. Experimental investigation on heat loss and combustion in methane/oxygen micro-tube combustor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2008, 28, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, J.; Chou, S.K.; Huang, G.; Yang, W.M.; Li, Z.W. Study on premixed combustion in cylindrical micro combustors: Transient flame behavior and wall heat flux. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2009, 33, 764–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.H.; Chen, G.B.; Cheng, T.S.; Yeh, Y.L.; Chao, Y.C. Combustion characteristics of a small-scale combustor with a percolated platinum emitter tube for thermophotovoltaics. Energy 2013, 61, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kaisare, N.S.; Deshmukh, S.R.; Vlachos, D.G. Stability and performance of catalytic microreactors: Simulations of propane catalytic combustion on Pt. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 1098–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bagheri, G.; Hosseini, S.E.; Wahid, M.A. Effects of bluff body shape on the flame stability in premixed micro-combustion of hydrogen air mixture. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 67, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Akhtar, S.; Khan, M.N.; Kurnia, J.C.; Shamim, T. Investigation of energy conversion and flame stability in a curved micro-combustor for thermo-photovoltaic (TPV) applications. Appl. Energy 2017, 192, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cao, Z.; Lyu, Y.J.; Peng, J.B.; Qiu, P.H.; Liu, L.; Yang, C.B.; Yu, Y.; Chang, G.; Yan, B.A.; Sun, S.Z.; et al. Experimental study of flame evolution, frequency and oscillation characteristics of steam diluted micro-mixing hydrogen flame. Fuel 2021, 301, 121078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Choi, B.-I.; Han, Y.-S.; Kim, M.-B.; Hwang, C.-H.; Oh, C.B. Experimental and numerical studies of mixing and flame stability in a micro-cyclone combustor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 5276–5286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Glassman, I. Combustion; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  67. Bellenoue, M.; Kageyama, T.; Labuda, S.A.; Sotton, J. Direct measurement of laminar flame quenching distance in a closed vessel. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2003, 27, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Aggarwal, S.K. Extinction of laminar partially premixed flames. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2009, 35, 528–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fu, K.; Knobloch, A.J.; Martinez, F.C.; Walther, D.C.; Fernandez-Pello, C.; Pisano, A.P.; Liepmann, D.; Miyaska, K.; Maruta, K. Design and Experimental Results of Small-Scale Rotary Engines. In Proceedings of the 2001 ASME International Mechanical Engineering-Congress and Exposition, New York, NY, USA, 11–16 November 2001. [Google Scholar]
  70. Eckart, S.; Yu, C.; Maas, U.; Krause, H. Experimental and numerical investigations on extinction strain rates in non-premixed counterflow methane and propane flames in an oxygen reduced environment. Fuel 2021, 298, 120781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shanbhogue, S.J.; Sanusi, Y.S.; Taamallah, S.; Habib, M.A.; Mokheimer, E.M.A.; Ghoniem, A.F. Flame macrostructures, combustion instability and extinction strain scaling in swirl-stabilized premixed CH4/H2 combustion. Combust. Flame 2016, 163, 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Daneshvar, H.; Prinja, R.; Kherani, N.P. Thermophotovoltaics: Fundamentals, challenges and prospects. Appl. Energy 2015, 159, 560–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, W.M.; Chua, K.J.; Pan, J.F.; Jiang, D.Y.; An, H. Development of micro-thermophotovoltaic power generator with heat recuperation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 78, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tang, G.; Jin, P.; Bao, Y.; Chai, W.S.; Zhou, L. Experimental investigation of premixed combustion limits of hydrogen and methane additives in ammonia. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 20765–20776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chan, W.R.; Bermel, P.; Pilawa-Podgurski, R.C.; Marton, C.H.; Jensen, K.F.; Senkevich, J.J.; Joannopoulos, J.D.; Soljacic, M.; Celanovic, I. Toward high-energy-density, high-efficiency, and moderate-temperature chip-scale thermophotovoltaics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5309–5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zhao, Z.; Zuo, Z.; Wang, W.; Kuang, N.; Xu, P. Experimental studies on a high performance thermoelectric system based on micro opposed flow porous combustor. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 253, 115157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Konakov, S.A.; Dzyubanenko, S.V.; Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V. Computer Simulation Approach in Development of Propane-air Combustor Microreactor. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 101, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tan, D.; Wu, Y.; Lv, J.; Li, J.; Ou, X.; Meng, Y.; Lan, G.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z. Performance optimization of a diesel engine fueled with hydrogen/biodiesel with water addition based on the response surface methodology. Energy 2023, 263, 125869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Su, Y.; Song, J.; Chai, J.; Cheng, Q.; Luo, Z.; Lou, C.; Fu, P. Numerical investigation of a novel micro combustor with double-cavity for micro-thermophotovoltaic system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 106, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yilmaz, H.; Cam, O.; Yilmaz, I. Effect of micro combustor geometry on combustion and emission behavior of premixed hydrogen/air flames. Energy 2017, 135, 585–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, J.; Song, W.; Xu, D. Optimal combustor dimensions for the catalytic combustion of methane-air mixtures in micro-channels. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 134, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, J.J.; Song, W.Y.; Gao, X.H.; Xu, D.G. Hetero-/homogeneous combustion and flame stability of fuel-lean propane-air mixtures over platinum in catalytic micro-combustors. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 100, 932–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Abaidi, A.H.; Madani, B. Intensification of hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming by catalyst segmentation and metallic foam insert. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 37583–37598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fumey, B.; Buetler, T.; Vogt, U.F. Ultra-low NOx emissions from catalytic hydrogen combustion. Appl. Energy 2018, 213, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mohammadi, A.; Shioji, M.; Nakai, Y.; Ishikura, W.; Tabo, E. Performance and combustion characteristics of a direct injection SI hydrogen engine. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tang, A.; Xu, Y.; Shan, C.; Pan, J.; Liu, Y. A comparative study on combustion characteristics of methane, propane and hydrogen fuels in a micro-combustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 16587–16596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tang, C.; He, J.; Huang, Z.; Jin, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Miao, H. Measurements of laminar burning velocities and Markstein lengths of propane–hydrogen–air mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 7274–7285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Law, C. Effects of hydrocarbon substitution on atmospheric hydrogen–air flame propagation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2004, 29, 867–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, S.I.; Um, D.H.; Kwon, O.C. Performance of a micro-thermophotovoltaic power system using an ammonia-hydrogen blend-fueled micro-emitter. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 9330–9342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Briones, A.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Aggarwal, S. Analysis of entropy generation in hydrogen-enriched methane–air propagating triple flames. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 1074–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, W.; Zuo, Z.; Liu, J.; Yang, W. The effects of hydrogen addition, inlet temperature and wall thermal conductivity on the flame-wall thermal coupling of premixed propane/air mixtures in meso-scale tubes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 10458–10468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jiang, D.; Yang, W.; Teng, J. Entropy generation analysis of fuel lean premixed CO/H2/air flames. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 5210–5220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wu, Y.-T.; Li, Y.-H. Combustion characteristics of a micro segment platinum tubular reactor with a gap. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fanaee, S.A.; Esfahani, J.A. Two-dimensional analytical model of flame characteristic in catalytic micro-combustors for a hydrogen–air mixture. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 4600–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tang, A.; Deng, J.; Cai, T.; Xu, Y.; Pan, J. Combustion characteristics of premixed propane/hydrogen/air in the micro-planar combustor with different channel-heights. Appl. Energy 2017, 203, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wei, J.; Peng, Q.; Shi, Z.; Xie, B.; Kang, Z.; Ye, J.; Fu, G. Investigation on the H2 fueled combustion with CH4 and C3H8 blending in a micro tube with/without fins. Fuel 2022, 328, 125314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, J.; Huang, Z.; Tang, C.; Miao, H.; Wang, X. Numerical study of the effect of hydrogen addition on methane–air mixtures combustion. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 1084–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yuan, Z.; Fan, A. The effects of aspect ratio on CH4/air flame stability in rectangular mesoscale combustors. J. Energy Inst. 2020, 93, 792–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Peng, Q.; Wei, J.; Yang, W.; Jiaqiang, E. Study on combustion characteristic of premixed H2/C3H8/air and working performance in the micro combustor with block. Fuel 2022, 318, 123676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tang, C.; Huang, Z.; Jin, C.; He, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Miao, H. Laminar burning velocities and combustion characteristics of propane–hydrogen–air premixed flames. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 4906–4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, J.; Huang, H.Y.; Bai, Y.; Li, S.J.; Kobayashi, N. Combustion and heat release characteristics of hydrogen/air diffusion flame on a micro jet array burner. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 13563–13574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Di Benedetto, A.; Di Sarli, V.; Russo, G. A novel catalytic-homogenous micro-combustor. Catal. Today 2009, 147, S156–S161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pizza, G.; Mantzaras, J.; Frouzakis, C.E. Flame dynamics in catalytic and non-catalytic mesoscale microreactors. Catal. Today 2010, 155, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Basavaraju, A.; Ramesh, A.B.; Jajcevic, D.; Heitmeir, F. Experimental parametric investigation of platinum catalysts using hydrogen fuel. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 21307–21321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Barbato, P.S.; Di Sarli, V.; Landi, G.; Di Benedetto, A. High pressure methane catalytic combustion over novel partially coated LaMnO3-based monoliths. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Tian, J.; Zhong, Y.; Zou, Z.; Dong, R.; Gao, S.; Xu, W.; Tan, D. The effects of Mn-based catalysts on the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature: A review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 230, 107213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Di Sarli, V.; Barbato, P.S.; Di Benedetto, A.; Landi, G. Start-up behavior of a LaMnO3 partially coated monolithic combustor at high pressure. Catal. Today 2015, 242, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. He, L.; Fan, Y.; Bellettre, J.; Yue, J.; Luo, L. A review on catalytic methane combustion at low temperatures: Catalysts, mechanisms, reaction conditions and reactor designs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 109589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Park, J.; Lim, H.; Rhee, G.H.; Karng, S.W. Catalyst filled heat exchanger for hydrogen liquefaction. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2021, 170, 121007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lu, Q.; Pan, J.; Yang, W.; Pan, Z.; Tang, A.; Zhang, Y. Effects of products from heterogeneous reactions on homogeneous combustion for H2/O2 mixture in the micro combustor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 102, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Landi, G.; Di Benedetto, A.; Barbato, P.S.; Russo, G.; Di Sarli, V. Transient behavior of structured LaMnO3 catalyst during methane combustion at high pressure. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 116, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Karagiannidis, S.; Mantzaras, J.; Jackson, G.; Boulouchos, K. Hetero-/homogeneous combustion and stability maps in methane-fueled catalytic microreactors. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007, 31, 3309–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chen, J.; Yan, L.; Song, W.; Xu, D. Effect of heat recirculation on the combustion stability of methane-air mixtures in catalytic micro-combustors. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 115, 702–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Taywade, U.W.; Deshpande, A.A.; Kumar, S. Thermal performance of a micro combustor with heat recirculation. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 109, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ye, J.; Peng, Q. Improved emissions conversion of diesel oxidation catalyst using multifactor impact analysis and neural network. Energy 2023, 271, 127048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Tan, D.; Meng, Y.; Tian, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, G.; Cui, S.; Hu, J.; Zhao, Z. Utilization of renewable and sustainable diesel/methanol/n-butanol (DMB) blends for reducing the engine emissions in a diesel engine with different pre-injection strategies. Energy 2023, 269, 126785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cai, T.; Zhao, D. Effects of fuel composition and wall thermal conductivity on thermal and NOx emission performances of an ammonia/hydrogen-oxygen micro-power system. Fuel Process. Technol. 2020, 209, 106527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cai, T.; Becker, S.M.; Cao, F.; Wang, B.; Tang, A.; Fu, J.; Han, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, D. NO emission performance assessment on a perforated plate-implemented premixed ammonia-oxygen micro-combustion system. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 128033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bazooyar, B.; Jomekian, A.; Karimi-Sibaki, E.; Habibi, M.; Darabkhani, H.G. The role of heat recirculation and flame stabilization in the formation of NOx in a thermo-photovoltaic micro-combustor step wall. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 26012–26027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Di Sarli, V.; Trofa, M.; Di Benedetto, A. A Novel Catalytic Micro-Combustor Inspired by the Nasal Geometry of Reindeer: CFD Modeling and Simulation. Catalysts 2020, 10, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, Y.-H.; Hong, J.-R. Performance assessment of catalytic combustion-driven thermophotovoltaic platinum tubular reactor. Appl. Energy 2018, 211, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, Y.; Pan, J.; Zhu, Y.; Bani, S.; Lu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Ren, H. The effect of embedded high thermal conductivity material on combustion performance of catalytic micro combustor. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 174, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Numerical comparison of H2/air catalytic combustion characteristic of micro–combustors with a conventional, slotted or controllable slotted bluff body. Energy 2019, 189, 116242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Reinke, M.; Mantzaras, J.; Bombach, R.; Schenker, S.; Inauen, A. Gas phase chemistry in catalytic combustion of methane/air mixtures over platinum at pressures of 1 to 16 bar. Combust. Flame 2005, 141, 448–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Li, L.; Yang, G.; Fan, A. Non-premixed combustion characteristics and thermal performance of a catalytic combustor for micro-thermophotovoltaic systems. Energy 2021, 214, 118893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ran, J.; Li, L.; Du, X.; Wang, R.; Pan, W.; Tang, W. Numerical investigations on characteristics of methane catalytic combustion in micro-channels with a concave or convex wall cavity. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 97, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Namazi, M.; Nayebi, M.; Isazadeh, A.; Modarresi, A.; Marzbali, I.G.; Hosseinalipour, S.M. Experimental and numerical study of catalytic combustion and pore-scale numerical study of mass diffusion in high porosity fibrous porous media. Energy 2022, 238, 121831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chen, J.; Yan, L.; Song, W. Study on Catalytic Combustion Characteristics of the Micro-Engine with Detailed Chemical Kinetic Model of Methane-Air Mixture. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2014, 187, 505–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mundhwa, M.; Parmar, R.D.; Thurgood, C.P. A comparative parametric study of a catalytic plate methane reformer coated with segmented and continuous layers of combustion catalyst for hydrogen production. J. Power Sources 2017, 344, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Peng, Q.; Yang, W.; Jiaqiang, E.; Xu, H.; Li, Z.; Yu, W.; Tu, Y.; Wu, Y. Experimental investigation on premixed hydrogen/air combustion in varied size combustors inserted with porous medium for thermophotovoltaic system applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 200, 112086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lloyd, S.A.; Weinberg, F.J. A recirculating fluidized bed combustor for extended flow ranges. Combust. Flame 1976, 27, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hua, J.; Wu, M.; Kumar, K. Numerical simulation of the combustion of hydrogen–air mixture in micro-scaled chambers. Part I: Fundamental study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 3497–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Leach, T.T.; Cadou, C.P. The role of structural heat exchange and heat loss in the design of efficient silicon micro-combustors. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2005, 30, 2437–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Veeraragavan, A.; Cadou, C. Experimental investigation of influence of heat recirculation on temperature distribution and burning velocity in a simulated micro-burner. In Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 8–11 January 2007; p. 577. [Google Scholar]
  135. Pan, J.F.; Huang, J.; Li, D.T.; Yang, W.M.; Tang, W.X.; Xue, H. Effects of major parameters on micro-combustion for thermophotovoltaic energy conversion. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2007, 27, 1089–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, W.; Zhou, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Cen, K. Instability of flame in micro-combustor under different external thermal environment. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2011, 35, 1451–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Janvekar, A.A.; Miskam, M.A.; Abas, A.; Ahmad, Z.A.; Juntakan, T.; Abdullah, M.Z. Effects of the preheat layer thickness on surface/submerged flame during porous media combustion of micro burner. Energy 2017, 122, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yan, Y.; Huang, W.; Tang, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Ran, J.; Yang, Z. Numerical study on catalytic combustion and extinction characteristics of pre-mixed methane–air in micro flatbed channel under different parameters of operation and wall. Fuel 2016, 180, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Som, S.K.; Rana, U. Wall heat recirculation and exergy preservation in flow through a small tube with thin heat source. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 64, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chang, F.L.; Hung, Y.M. The coupled effects of working fluid and solid wall on thermal performance of micro heat pipes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 73, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wan, J.; Fan, A. Effect of solid material on the blow-off limit of CH4 /air flames in a micro combustor with a plate flame holder and preheating channels. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 101, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Li, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Liu, X. Fundamental flame characteristics of premixed H2–air combustion in a planar porous micro-combustor. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 1187–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jejurkar, S.Y.; Mishra, D.P. Effects of wall thermal conductivity on entropy generation and exergy losses in a H2-air premixed flame microcombustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 15851–15859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Wan, J.; Fan, A.; Yao, H.; Liu, W. Effect of thermal conductivity of solid wall on combustion efficiency of a micro-combustor with cavities. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 96, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Rana, U.; Chakraborty, S.; Som, S.K. Thermodynamics of premixed combustion in a heat recirculating micro combustor. Energy 2014, 68, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Nemitallah, M.A.; Kewlani, G.; Hong, S.; Shanbhogue, S.J.; Habib, M.A.; Ghoniem, A.F. Investigation of a turbulent premixed combustion flame in a backward-facing step combustor; effect of equivalence ratio. Energy 2016, 95, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Mayi, O.T.S.; Kenfack, S.; Ndamé, M.K.; Obounou Akong, M.B.; Agbébavi, J.T. Numerical simulation of premixed methane/air micro flame: Effects of simplified one step chemical kinetic mechanisms on the flame stability. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 73, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Lei, Y.; Chen, W.; Lei, J. Combustion and direct energy conversion inside a micro-combustor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 100, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Fan, A.; Wan, J.; Liu, Y.; Pi, B.; Yao, H.; Liu, W. Effect of bluff body shape on the blow-off limit of hydrogen/air flame in a planar micro-combustor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 62, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cai, T.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, D. Enhancing heat transfer performance analyses of a hydrogen-fueled meso-combustor with staggered bluff-bodies. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 218, 106867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lee, B.J.; Yoo, C.S.; Im, H.G. Dynamics of bluff-body-stabilized premixed hydrogen/air flames in a narrow channel. Combust. Flame 2015, 162, 2602–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Niu, J.; Ran, J.; Li, L.; Du, X.; Wang, R.; Ran, M. Effects of trapezoidal bluff bodies on blow out limit of methane/air combustion in a micro-channel. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 95, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Fan, A.; Wan, J.; Liu, Y.; Pi, B.; Yao, H.; Maruta, K.; Liu, W. The effect of the blockage ratio on the blow-off limit of a hydrogen/air flame in a planar micro-combustor with a bluff body. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 11438–11445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yan, Y.; Yan, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Z. Numerical investigation on combustion characteristics of methane/air in a micro-combustor with a regular triangular pyramid bluff body. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 7581–7590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Akhtar, S.; Piffaretti, S.; Shamim, T. Numerical investigation of flame structure and blowout limit for lean premixed turbulent methane-air flames under high pressure conditions. Appl. Energy 2018, 228, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zuo, H.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, S.; Abubakar, S.; Li, Y. Effect of a crossed-semicircular-plate on thermal performance of micro-combustor fueled by premixed hydrogen-air mixture. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 17442–17453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Gao, W.; Yan, Y.; Huang, L.; Shen, K.; He, Z.; Gao, B. Numerical comparison of premixed H2/air combustion characteristic of three types of micro cavity-combustors with guide vanes, bluff body, guide vanes and bluff body respectively. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 24382–24394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Peng, Q.; Jiaqiang, E.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, W.; Zhao, X. Investigation on the effects of front-cavity on flame location and thermal performance of a cylindrical micro combustor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 130, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Akhtar, S.; Kurnia, J.C.; Shamim, T. A three-dimensional computational model of H2–air premixed combustion in non-circular micro-channels for a thermo-photovoltaic (TPV) application. Appl. Energy 2015, 152, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Baigmohammadi, M.; Sarrafan Sadeghi, S.; Tabejamaat, S.; Zarvandi, J. Numerical study of the effects of wire insertion on CH4(methane)/AIR pre-mixed flame in a micro combustor. Energy 2013, 54, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Alipoor, A.; Saidi, M.H. Numerical study of hydrogen-air combustion characteristics in a novel micro-thermophotovoltaic power generator. Appl. Energy 2017, 199, 382–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Fan, A.; Zhang, H.; Wan, J. Numerical investigation on flame blow-off limit of a novel microscale Swiss-roll combustor with a bluff-body. Energy 2017, 123, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Su, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Song, J.; Si, M. Numerical study on a multiple-channel micro combustor for a micro-thermophotovoltaic system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 120, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Shirsat, V.; Gupta, A.K. A review of progress in heat recirculating meso-scale combustors. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 4294–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Ronney, P.D. Analysis of non-adiabatic heat-recirculating combustors. Combust. Flame 2003, 135, 421–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Di Benedetto, A.; Di Sarli, V.; Russo, G. Effect of geometry on the thermal behavior of catalytic micro-combustors. Catal. Today 2010, 155, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wan, J.; Fan, A.; Yao, H. Effect of the length of a plate flame holder on flame blowout limit in a micro-combustor with preheating channels. Combust. Flame 2016, 170, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Yang, W.M.; Chou, S.K.; Shu, C.; Li, Z.W.; Xue, H. Combustion in micro-cylindrical combustors with and without a backward facing step. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2002, 22, 1777–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Qian, P.; Liu, M.; Li, X.; Xie, F.; Huang, Z.; Luo, C.; Zhu, X. Combustion characteristics and radiation performance of premixed hydrogen/air combustion in a mesoscale divergent porous media combustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 5002–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Li, J.; Chou, S.K.; Li, Z.; Yang, W. Development of 1D model for the analysis of heat transport in cylindrical micro combustors. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2009, 29, 1854–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Li, J.; Chou, S.K.; Li, Z.W.; Yang, W.M. Characterization of wall temperature and radiation power through cylindrical dump micro-combustors. Combust. Flame 2009, 156, 1587–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Peng, Q.; E, J.; Yang, W.M.; Xu, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, F.; Meng, T.; Qiu, R. Experimental and numerical investigation of a micro-thermophotovoltaic system with different backward-facing steps and wall thicknesses. Energy 2019, 173, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ma, L.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, C.; Chen, G. A novel Swiss-roll micro-combustor with double combustion chambers: A numerical investigation on effect of solid material on premixed CH4/air flame blow-off limit. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 16116–16126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wei, J.; Fu, G.; Yang, W.; Li, S.; Jiaqiang, E.; Peng, Q.; Zhang, A. Investigation on hydrogen-fueled combustion characteristics and thermal performance in a micro heat-recirculation combustor inserted with block. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 36515–36527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Kaisare, N.S.; Di Sarli, V. The Effect of Catalyst Placement on the Stability of a U-Bend Catalytic Heat-Recirculating Micro-Combustor: A Numerical Investigation. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Di Sarli, V. The Effect of Differentiating the Thermal Conductivity between Inner and Outer Walls on the Stability of a U-Bend Catalytic Heat-Recirculating Micro-Combustor: A CFD Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Zhong, B.-J.; Wang, J.-H. Experimental study on premixed CH4/air mixture combustion in micro Swiss-roll combustors. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 2222–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Barra, A.J.; Ellzey, J.L. Heat recirculation and heat transfer in porous burners. Combust. Flame 2004, 137, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Jiaqiang, E.; Ding, J.; Chen, J.; Liao, G.; Zhang, F.; Luo, B. Process in micro-combustion and energy conversion of micro power system: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 246, 114664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Chou, S.K.; Yang, W.M.; Li, J.; Li, Z.W. Porous media combustion for micro thermophotovoltaic system applications. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 2862–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Mujeebu, M.A.; Abdullah, M.Z.; Bakar, M.Z.; Mohamad, A.A.; Muhad, R.M.; Abdullah, M.K. Combustion in porous media and its applications—A comprehensive survey. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2287–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Wu, Y.; Peng, Q.; Yang, M.; Shan, J.; Yang, W. Entropy generation analysis of premixed hydrogen–air combustion in a micro combustor with porous medium. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2021, 168, 108566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Yang, W.M.; Chou, S.K.; Chua, K.J.; Li, J.; Zhao, X. Research on modular micro combustor-radiator with and without porous media. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168, 799–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Mujeebu, M.A.; Abdullah, M.Z.; Mohamad, A.A.; Bakar, M.Z.A. Trends in modeling of porous media combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 627–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Peng, Q.; Ye, J.; Tu, Y.; Yang, W.; Jiaqiang, E.; Kang, Z.; Fu, G. Experimental and numerical investigation on premixed H2/C3H8/air combustion and thermal performance in a burner with partially filled porous media. Fuel 2022, 328, 125227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Chaelek, A.; Grare, U.M.; Jugjai, S. Self-aspirating/air-preheating porous medium gas burner. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 153, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Fan, A.; Wan, J.; Yao, H.; Liu, W. Numerical investigation of CH4/O2 mixing in Y-shaped mesoscale combustors with/without porous media. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2014, 79, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Shi, J.; Liu, X. Dynamic behaviors of premixed hydrogen–air flames in a planar micro-combustor filled with porous medium. Fuel 2015, 145, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Yan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wu, G.; Feng, S.; Yang, Z. Numerical study on methane/air combustion characteristics in a heat-recirculating micro combustor embedded with porous media. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 20999–21012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Gao, J.; Hossain, A.; Matsuoka, T.; Nakamura, Y. A numerical study on heat-recirculation assisted combustion for small scale jet diffusion flames at near-extinction condition. Combust. Flame 2017, 178, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Li, Q.; Li, J.; Shi, J.; Guo, Z. Effects of heat transfer on flame stability limits in a planar micro-combustor partially filled with porous medium. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 5645–5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Voss, S.; Mendes, M.A.A.; Pereira, J.M.C.; Ray, S.; Pereira, J.C.F.; Trimis, D. Investigation on the thermal flame thickness for lean premixed combustion of low calorific H2/CO mixtures within porous inert media. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2013, 34, 3335–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Shi, J.-R.; Li, B.-W.; Xia, Y.-F.; Chen, P.-F.; Xu, Y.-N.; Liu, H.-S. Numerical study of diffusion filtration combustion characteristics in a plane-parallel packed bed. Fuel 2015, 158, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Liu, H.; Dong, S.; Li, B.-W.; Chen, H.-G. Parametric investigations of premixed methane–air combustion in two-section porous media by numerical simulation. Fuel 2010, 89, 1736–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Chua, K.J.; Yang, W.M.; Ong, W.J. Fundamental Experiment and Numerical Analysis of a Modular Microcombustor with Silicon Carbide Porous Medium. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 6327–6339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Xie, B.; Peng, Q.; Shi, Z.; Wei, J.; Kang, Z.; Wei, D.; Tian, X.; Fu, G. Investigation of CH4 and porous media addition on thermal and working performance in premixed H2/air combustion for micro thermophotovoltaic. Fuel 2023, 339, 127444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Pan, J.F.; Wu, D.; Liu, Y.X.; Zhang, H.F.; Tang, A.K.; Xue, H. Hydrogen/oxygen premixed combustion characteristics in micro porous media combustor. Appl. Energy 2015, 160, 802–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Shi, J.; Liu, X. Experimental study on standing wave regimes of premixed H2–air combustion in planar micro-combustors partially filled with porous medium. Fuel 2016, 167, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Peng, Q.; Jiaqiang, E.; Chen, J.; Zuo, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Z. Investigation on the effects of wall thickness and porous media on the thermal performance of a non-premixed hydrogen fueled cylindrical micro combustor. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 155, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of (a) heat energy utilization path released by micro burner and (b) micro power equipment: ① Self-heat, ② Thermal to electrical, ③ Thermal to chemical, ④ Thermal to mechanical [11].
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of (a) heat energy utilization path released by micro burner and (b) micro power equipment: ① Self-heat, ② Thermal to electrical, ③ Thermal to chemical, ④ Thermal to mechanical [11].
Energies 16 03201 g001
Figure 2. The micro energy system. (a) The energy transfer and conversion in micro generators [49]. (b) The TEG and TPV coupled power generation system [47].
Figure 2. The micro energy system. (a) The energy transfer and conversion in micro generators [49]. (b) The TEG and TPV coupled power generation system [47].
Energies 16 03201 g002
Figure 3. (a) The temperature distribution, (b) the effect on the average temperature, and (c) blending ratio on the distribution of OH radical (right) and temperature (left), adding different CH4 and C3H8 at Ec = 124.7 W and Φ = 1.0 [96].
Figure 3. (a) The temperature distribution, (b) the effect on the average temperature, and (c) blending ratio on the distribution of OH radical (right) and temperature (left), adding different CH4 and C3H8 at Ec = 124.7 W and Φ = 1.0 [96].
Energies 16 03201 g003
Figure 4. (a) The temperature distribution, (b) the production rate of NO [97], and (c) the influence of temperature (left) and OH radicals (right) distribution with varied hydrogen mole fraction at Vf = 200 mL/min [99].
Figure 4. (a) The temperature distribution, (b) the production rate of NO [97], and (c) the influence of temperature (left) and OH radicals (right) distribution with varied hydrogen mole fraction at Vf = 200 mL/min [99].
Energies 16 03201 g004aEnergies 16 03201 g004b
Figure 5. Principle of catalytic reaction [104].
Figure 5. Principle of catalytic reaction [104].
Energies 16 03201 g005
Figure 6. The diagram of micro combustor [113].
Figure 6. The diagram of micro combustor [113].
Energies 16 03201 g006
Figure 7. The formation routes of nitrogen oxides [119].
Figure 7. The formation routes of nitrogen oxides [119].
Energies 16 03201 g007
Figure 8. Catalyst structure and application of catalytic methane combustion [108].
Figure 8. Catalyst structure and application of catalytic methane combustion [108].
Energies 16 03201 g008aEnergies 16 03201 g008b
Figure 9. (a) The recirculation zone (x < 0.0022 m) and (b) the distribution of OH radicals affected by the bluff body at the blow−off limit of 36 m/s and 43 m/s, respectively [149].
Figure 9. (a) The recirculation zone (x < 0.0022 m) and (b) the distribution of OH radicals affected by the bluff body at the blow−off limit of 36 m/s and 43 m/s, respectively [149].
Energies 16 03201 g009
Figure 10. The influence of combustor structure optimization on temperature flow field at mH = 8.34 × 10−7 kg/s and Φ = 1.0 [174]. (a) Structure model of burner, (b) cloud diagram.
Figure 10. The influence of combustor structure optimization on temperature flow field at mH = 8.34 × 10−7 kg/s and Φ = 1.0 [174]. (a) Structure model of burner, (b) cloud diagram.
Energies 16 03201 g010
Figure 11. The influence of heat recirculation on thermal performance of micro burner at Φ = 1.0 [73].
Figure 11. The influence of heat recirculation on thermal performance of micro burner at Φ = 1.0 [73].
Energies 16 03201 g011
Figure 12. (a) The structure diagram and (b) principle diagram of porous medium combustion [183,184].
Figure 12. (a) The structure diagram and (b) principle diagram of porous medium combustion [183,184].
Energies 16 03201 g012
Figure 13. The effect of porous medium layout: (a) wall temperature distribution and (b) radiation power with various flow rates [17].
Figure 13. The effect of porous medium layout: (a) wall temperature distribution and (b) radiation power with various flow rates [17].
Energies 16 03201 g013
Figure 14. (a) The heat transfer and (b) structure diagram of a combustor, and (c) comparison of external wall temperature distribution in a burner with/without porous medium at mH = 2.36 g/h and Φ = 0.85. [130].
Figure 14. (a) The heat transfer and (b) structure diagram of a combustor, and (c) comparison of external wall temperature distribution in a burner with/without porous medium at mH = 2.36 g/h and Φ = 0.85. [130].
Energies 16 03201 g014
Figure 15. The effects of porous media (a) at Ec= 108 W and Φ = 1.0, (b,c) at Vin = 20 m/s, Φ = 0.5 [189,196].
Figure 15. The effects of porous media (a) at Ec= 108 W and Φ = 1.0, (b,c) at Vin = 20 m/s, Φ = 0.5 [189,196].
Energies 16 03201 g015aEnergies 16 03201 g015b
Table 1. Power density values of various energy sources based on complete combustion of CO2/H2O at 298 K and 1 atm [11].
Table 1. Power density values of various energy sources based on complete combustion of CO2/H2O at 298 K and 1 atm [11].
Energy SourcePower Density (MJ/kg)Energy SourcePower Density (MJ/kg)
Lead-acid cells0.0792N-butane49.6
Nickel-cadmium cells0.158Propane50.3
Li-ion cells0.468Methane55.5
Lithium-sulfur cells0.792Hydrogen142
Methanol22.7Diesel oil45.3
Alcohol30.5Gasoline45.8
N-octane48.2
Table 2. Quenching distance of premixed combustion of hydrogen/hydrocarbon.
Table 2. Quenching distance of premixed combustion of hydrogen/hydrocarbon.
Fuel/AirFlameout Distance (mm)Fuel/O2Flameout Distance (mm)
H2/air0.6H2/O20.2
CH4/air2.5CH4/O20.3
C2H2/air0.5C2H2/O20.2
C3H8/air2.1C3H8/O20.25
Table 3. Summary of different burners.
Table 3. Summary of different burners.
AuthorModelPatternRemarks
Gao et al. [157]Energies 16 03201 i001Inserting guide vanes, bluff bodyHigher uniformity and
average temperature.
Peng et al. [158] Energies 16 03201 i002Installing front cavityImproving flame stability and energy conversion
efficiency.
Akhtar et al. [159] Energies 16 03201 i003Channels with varied configuration Increasing vorticity,
enhancing heat transfer.
Baigmohammadi et al. [160]Energies 16 03201 i004Wire insertion methodImproving combustion
process, increasing wall temperature.
Akhtar et al. [63]Energies 16 03201 i005Changing curvature Outer wall temperature and energy conversion efficiency increased by 110 K and 7.84%.
Alipoor et al. [161]Energies 16 03201 i006U-tubeBetter preheating,
increasing
flammability
limits.
Ansari et al. [10]Energies 16 03201 i007Coupling
baffle with
bluff wall
Temperature
uniformity increased
87.5%.
Aravind et al. [6]Energies 16 03201 i008Three-step with recirculation pathFavorable
temperature
uniformity, enhancing
flame stability
Fan et al. [162]Energies 16 03201 i009Micro Swiss roll Reducing the flame
stretching effect, increasing the blow-out limit.
Su et al. [163]Energies 16 03201 i010MultichannelLessening temperature
difference, improving
temperature uniformity.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Ye, J.; Tian, X.; Huang, Z.; Wang, H.; Wei, D.; Peng, Q.; Tu, Y. A Review of Micro Power System and Micro Combustion: Present Situation, Techniques and Prospects. Energies 2023, 16, 3201. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073201

AMA Style

Kang Z, Shi Z, Ye J, Tian X, Huang Z, Wang H, Wei D, Peng Q, Tu Y. A Review of Micro Power System and Micro Combustion: Present Situation, Techniques and Prospects. Energies. 2023; 16(7):3201. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073201

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Zhuang, Zhiwei Shi, Jiahao Ye, Xinghua Tian, Zhixin Huang, Hao Wang, Depeng Wei, Qingguo Peng, and Yaojie Tu. 2023. "A Review of Micro Power System and Micro Combustion: Present Situation, Techniques and Prospects" Energies 16, no. 7: 3201. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073201

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop