Next Article in Journal
Knockout of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene in Fusarium oxysporum for Enhanced Ethanol Yield
Previous Article in Journal
Metaheuristic for the Allocation and Sizing of PV-STATCOMs for Ancillary Service Provision
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology

CHOSE—Centre for Hybrid and Organic Solar Energy, Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
Energies 2023, 16(1), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010425
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section D1: Advanced Energy Materials)

1. Introduction

Photovoltaic (PV) technology is the symbol of a sustainable future in many countries around the globe [1]. As a result, numerous investments have been made in research, development, demonstrations, and production lines. No other renewable technology has received such strong appreciation from the public, or in politics and industry. New technologies have paved the way for new materials, products, and additional market segments [2,3]. Engineering, nanoscience, nanotechnology, and surface science have contributed to introducing new materials and customized processes for solar technology. In recent decades, many research institutes, companies, and consortia have demonstrated that the new concept of solar cell technology can achieve high performance, large application areas, and industrialization. Different types of solar devices exist among the third-generation PVs that have recently emerged [3,4], and their benefits and issues have been exhibited in various studies: dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) [5,6], hybrid and organic solar cells [7], quantum dot solar cells [8], and perovskite (PVSK) solar cells (PSC) [9,10].
Here, the successful invited submissions to the Special Issue of Energies on “Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology” are presented. The third-generation PV technologies chosen by the authors are DSSC and PSC.

2. Special Issue Articles

In this Special Issue, DSSC (the first developed) and PSC were the two mainly investigated third-generation PV technologies.
The following features make DSSC technology suitable for building-integrated PVs (BIPVs) [11], consumer electronics, and indoor applications [12]: different device colors [13], transparency in the visible range [14], low correlation with the light angle [15,16], better operation in diffuse light compared to traditional PV technologies [17], bifacial concept [18], low-cost fabrication processes [11], possibility to use rigid and flexible substrates [19], and environmental sustainability.
The comparable fabrication procedures with organic electronics and DSSC have boosted the success of PSC technology [20,21]. Moreover, the organometal halide perovskites possess unique physical–chemical properties [22,23,24] (high absorption coefficient, ambipolar charge transport, large charge carriers lifetime and diffusion length, flexible bandgap tuning, low exciton binding energy) that are permitted to develop a solution process PV technology with power conversion efficiencies (25.7% for the single junction) higher than any thin-film PV and closely resembling that of silicon [25].
In this Special Issue, semi-transparent dye-sensitized solar modules (DSSMs) and panels (DSSPs) were fabricated to filter the sunlight from the roof of an aquaponic greenhouse [26], according to recent progress [27]. The agrovoltaic hot topic is related to the optimization of land by combining solar PV and food crops [28]. Greenhouses are equipped with many control devices for temperature, lighting, fans, and monitoring. DSSC can both satisfy the energy needs and selectively control the entry of light [29,30]. In the published paper, the aperture area (312.9 cm2) module efficiency and AVT (average visible transmittance) are equal to 3.88% and 35%, respectively [26]. The devices exhibited thermal and light stability during accelerated tests and were laminated to realize 10 panels (2 m2). The produced power was about 3 W in compliance with energy needs in a greenhouse. Moreover, the plant growth was not affected by DSSPs light filtering.
In a PSC, the electron transporting layer (ETL) and the hole transporting layer (HTL) drain from the photoactive layer electrons and holes to the respective electrodes, in order to limit recombination [31]. The hole-transporting material (HTM) is responsible for the stability, efficiency, and cost of a PSC. Since the HTM doping agents are mainly hygroscopic, the research focuses on finding a dopant-free HTM, such as small molecules or polymers.
The first review article in this Special Issue collects all the relevant organic dopant-free small-molecule HTMs adopted to fabricate PSCs with an efficiency above 15% [32]. The HTMs are classified according to their topology (1D linear, 2D star-shaped, 3D spiro-like) and related features. HTMs based on benzodithienosilole, benzodipyrrole, dithienopyrrole, bithiophencarboximide, truxenes, spirobifluorene and spiro[fluorene-9,9′-xanthene] cores guaranteed PSCs with an efficiency of more than 20%. Regarding the compaction of the molecules, the authors reported how the hole mobility can be improved by reducing the contact distance between packed molecules, particularly if the lowest distances include the chemical centers (simply oxidized and reduced). Moreover, the molecular planarity can help to improve the cell efficiency thanks to the stacking and high contact of the molecules. The review also presented high-stability compounds for potential commercialization.
This Special Issue also contains an article that tested an alternative efficient and stable low-cost fluorene-xanthene-based HTM [33]. The reference Spiro-OMeTAD HTM has high efficiency, but it is expensive and has low stability in the presence of humidity. For the first time on a large-area cell, the authors reported the low-cost X55 HTM with a deeper HOMO level and higher hole mobility and conductivity with respect to the Spiro-OMeTAD HTM [34]. The PSCs based on the homogeneous X55 film show higher VOC and maximum power point-stabilized efficiency with respect to the reference HTM because of poor defects and pin holes. The efficiency loss was about 15% lower with respect to Spiro-OMeTAD in a 1000 h ISOS-D-1 test (room temperature at 50% humidity).
The last review article focuses on n-i-p PSC efficiency and stability improvement by interfacial engineering through passivation treatment, in order to reduce non-radiative recombination [35]. Passivation acts as a shielding layer to protect the PVSK surface by reducing the trap states at the grains and grain boundaries. The paper introduces the surface reconstruction concept, i.e., the formation of a 3D [36], low-D interlayer [37], and the surface reconstruction with mixed salt through a synergistic effect [38]. The first two approaches reconstruct the PVSK surface through the formation of an optimized layer of 3D or low-D PVSK. Moreover, the low-D PVSK can enhance surface hydrophobicity. The mixed salts approach combines different improvements. In recent years, some passivation approaches have been upscaled to the module level [39,40]. The authors discovered a lack of studies concerning the material selection criteria and understanding of the passivation mechanisms.

3. Conclusions

The Special Issue “Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology” is composed of four papers: two research and two review articles. These cover some hot topics related to DSSC and PSC, such as large-area alternative application, efficiency, stability, cost, and sustainability. This editorial contains a brief summary by the guest editor of the main findings and considerations from the published invited submissions. The guest editor would like to thank the outstanding contributors, reviewers, MDPI Energies publisher, and editorial staff.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe program through a FET Proactive research and innovation action, under grant agreement No. 101084124 (DIAMOND). The author acknowledges the project UNIQUE, supported under the umbrella of the SOLAR-ERA.NET_cofund by ANR, PtJ, MUR (GA 775970), MINECOAEI, SWEA, within the European Union Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (Cofund ERANET Action, No. 691664).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luque, A.; Hegedus, S. Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2003; ISBN 0471491969. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoffmann, W. PV solar electricity industry: Market growth and perspective. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 3285–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nayak, P.K.; Mahesh, S.; Snaith, H.J.; Cahen, D. Photovoltaic solar cell technologies: Analysing the state of the art. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Green, M.A.; Dunlop, E.D.; Hohl-Ebinger, J.; Yoshita, M.; Kopidakis, N.; Bothe, K.; Hinken, D.; Rauer, M.; Hao, X. Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 60). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2022, 30, 687–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grätzel, M. Dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2003, 4, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. O’Regan, B.; Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wright, M.; Uddin, A. Organic-inorganic hybrid solar cells: A comparative review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 107, 87–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nozik, A.J. Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Physica E 2002, 14, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, Z.; Jayatissa, A.H. Perovskites-based solar cells: A review of recent progress, materials and processing methods. Materials 2018, 11, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Vesce, L.; Mariani, P.; Calamante, M.; Dessì, A.; Mordini, A.; Zani, L.; Di Carlo, A. Process Engineering of Semitransparent DSSC Modules and Panel Incorporating an Organic Sensitizer. Sol. RRL 2022, 6, 2200403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muñoz-García, A.B.; Benesperi, I.; Boschloo, G.; Concepcion, J.J.; Delcamp, J.H.; Gibson, E.A.; Meyer, G.J.; Pavone, M.; Pettersson, H.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells strike back. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 12450–12550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Otaka, H.; Kira, M.; Yano, K.; Ito, S.; Mitekura, H.; Kawata, T.; Matsui, F. Multi-colored dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2004, 164, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Selvaraj, P.; Baig, H.; Mallick, T.K.; Siviter, J.; Montecucco, A.; Li, W.; Paul, M.; Sweet, T.; Gao, M.; Knox, A.R.; et al. Enhancing the efficiency of transparent dye-sensitized solar cells using concentrated light. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 175, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khanna, S.; Sundaram, S.; Reddy, K.S.; Mallick, T.K. Performance analysis of perovskite and dye-sensitized solar cells under varying operating conditions and comparison with monocrystalline silicon cell. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 127, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dominici, L.; Vesce, L.; Colonna, D.; Michelotti, F.; Brown, T.M.; Reale, A.; Di Carlo, A. Angular and prism coupling refractive enhancement in dye solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 103302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ito, S.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Comte, P.; Liska, P.; Kuang, D.; Grätzel, M. Bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells based on an ionic liquid electrolyte. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zardetto, V.; De Angelis, G.; Vesce, L.; Caratto, V.; Mazzuca, C.; Gasiorowski, J.; Reale, A.; Di Carlo, A.; Brown, T.M. Formulations and processing of nanocrystalline TiO2 films for the different requirements of plastic, metal and glass dye solar cell applications. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 255401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Snaith, H.J. Present status and future prospects of perovskite photovoltaics. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Herterich, J.P.; Castriotta, L.A.; Kohlstädt, M.; Würfel, U.; Di Carlo, A. Ambient Air Blade-Coating Fabrication of Stable Triple-Cation Perovskite Solar Modules by Green Solvent Quenching. Sol. RRL 2021, 5, 2100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, H.S.; Lee, C.R.; Im, J.H.; Lee, K.B.; Moehl, T.; Marchioro, A.; Moon, S.J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Yum, J.H.; Moser, J.E.; et al. Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ahmed, M.I.; Habib, A.; Javaid, S.S. Perovskite Solar Cells: Potentials, Challenges, and Opportunities Muhammad. Int. J. Photoenergy 2015, 2015, 592308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kim, H.-J.; Kim, H.-S.; Park, N.-G. Progress of Perovskite Solar Modules. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2021, 2, 2000051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Green, M.A.; Dunlop, E.D.; Hohl-Ebinger, J.; Yoshita, M.; Kopidakis, N.; Hao, X. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 59). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2022, 30, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barichello, J.; Vesce, L.; Mariani, P.; Leonardi, E.; Braglia, R.; Di Carlo, A.; Canini, A.; Reale, A. Stable semi-transparent dye-sensitized solar modules and panels for greenhouse application. Energies 2021, 14, 6393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roslan, N.; Ya’acob, M.E.; Radzi, M.A.M.; Hashimoto, Y.; Jamaludin, D.; Chen, G. Dye Sensitized Solar Cell (DSSC) greenhouse shading: New insights for solar radiation manipulation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 92, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dupraz, C.; Marrou, H.; Talbot, G.; Dufour, L.; Nogier, A.; Ferard, Y. Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: Towards new agrivoltaic schemes. Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 2725–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Campiotti, C.; Viola, C.; Alonzo, G.; Bibbiani, C.; Giagnacovo, G.; Scoccianti, M.; Tumminelli, G. Sustainable greenhouse horticulture in Europe. J. Sustain. Energy 2012, 3, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  30. Al Mogren, M.M.; Ahmed, N.M.; Hasanein, A.A. Molecular modeling and photovoltaic applications of porphyrin-based dyes: A review. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2020, 24, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Calió, L.; Kazim, S.; Grätzel, M.; Ahmad, S. Hole-transport materials for perovskite solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14522–14545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Desoky, M.M.H.; Bonomo, M.; Buscaino, R.; Fin, A.; Viscardi, G.; Barolo, C.; Quagliotto, P. Solar Cells: Concepts and Structure—Property Relationships. Energies 2021, 14, 2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Di Carlo, A. Efficient and stable perovskite large area cells by low-cost fluorene-xantene-based hole transporting layer. Energies 2021, 14, 6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, B.; Zhang, J.; Hagfeldt, A.; Jen, K.; Sun, L.; Xu, B.; Zhang, J.; Hua, Y.; Liu, P.; Wang, L.; et al. Tailor-Making Low-Cost Spiro[fluorene-9,9′-xanthene]-Based 3D Oligomers for Perovskite Solar Cells Tailor-Making Low-Cost 3D Oligomers for Perovskite Solar Cells. Chem 2017, 2, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Suo, J.; Yang, B.; Hagfeldt, A. Passivation strategies through surface reconstruction toward highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells on n-i-p architecture. Energies 2021, 14, 4836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cho, K.T.; Paek, S.; Grancini, G.; Roldán-Carmona, C.; Gao, P.; Lee, Y.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Highly efficient perovskite solar cells with a compositionally engineered perovskite/hole transporting material interface. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, H.; Lee, S.-U.; Lee, D.Y.; Paik, M.J.; Na, H.; Lee, J.; Seok, S. Il Optimal Interfacial Engineering with Different Length of Alkylammonium Halide for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1902740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cho, Y.; Soufiani, A.M.; Yun, J.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, D.S.; Seidel, J.; Deng, X.; Green, M.A.; Huang, S.; Ho-Baillie, A.W.Y. Mixed 3D–2D Passivation Treatment for Mixed-Cation Lead Mixed-Halide Perovskite Solar Cells for Higher Efficiency and Better Stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vesce, L.; Stefanelli, M.; Castriotta, L.A.; Hadipour, A.; Lammar, S.; Yang, B.; Suo, J.; Aernouts, T.; Hagfeldt, A.; Di Carlo, A. Hysteresis-free Planar Perovskite Solar Module with 19.1% Efficiency by Interfacial Defects Passivation. Sol. RRL 2022, 6, 2101095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Du, M.; Zhu, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Feng, J.; Jiang, X.; Cao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Duan, L.; Jiao, Y.; et al. High-Pressure Nitrogen-Extraction and Effective Passivation to Attain Highest Large-Area Perovskite Solar Module Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vesce, L. Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology. Energies 2023, 16, 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010425

AMA Style

Vesce L. Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology. Energies. 2023; 16(1):425. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010425

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vesce, Luigi. 2023. "Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology" Energies 16, no. 1: 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010425

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop