Recent Progress on Emerging Applications of Hydrochar
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Role of Hydrochar for Multipurpose Applications
2.1. Solid Fuel and Combustion Properties of Hydrochar
Feedstock | Reaction Temperature; Time; Solid:Water Ratio | H/C; O/C | Fuel Ratio | HHV (MJ/kg) | Ignition Temperature, Ti (°C) | Burnout Temperature, Tb (°C) | Combustibility Index, Si × 10−7 (%2/ °C3.min2) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walnut shell | 180–300 °C; 1–6 h; 1:6–1:5–1:10 | 0.12–1.51 *; 0.73–0.84 * 0.89–1.58; 0.26–0.75 | 0.33 * 1.58–1.72 | 12.7–18.9 * 12.7–28.0 | [52,53] | |||
Peanut shell | 220 °C; 12 h; 1:7.5 | 1.58 *; 0.75 * 0.99; 0.27 | 0.36 * 0.76 | 12.6 * 28.1 | 249.7 * 362.7 | 485.8 * 550.9 | 2.7 * 1.1 | [45] |
Orange peel | 220 °C; 12 h; 1:7.5 | 1.76 *; 0.86 * 1.02; 0.27 | 0.23 * 0.83 | 12.1 * 28.2 | 197.0 * 371.3 | 492.9 * 539.9 | 3.4 * 1.3 | [45] |
Rice straw | 220 °C; 12 h; 1:7.5 | 1.74 *; 0.86 * 1.11; 0.28 | 0.22 * 0.22 | 16.9 * 20.6 | 243.6 * 369.1 | 461.9 * 524.9 | 3.1 * 0.8 | [45] |
Corn stover | 200–260 °C;0.5–1 h; 1:7.5–1:10 | 1.40 *; 0.83 * 1.30–0.80; 0.68–0.35 | 0.22 * 0.18–0.67 | 16.8–22.4 * 19.2–22.8 | 198.8–275.0 * 228.9–300.0 | 492.7–535.0 * 603.2–750.0 | 6.90–12.3 * 1.20–6.6 | [50,54] |
Corn stalk | 190–240 °C; 0.5–10 h; 1:6–1:10 | 1.63–1.72 *; 0.75–0.80 * 1.10–1.38; 0.32–0.55 | 0.09 * 0.33 | 17.2–17.6 * 19.7–24.7 | 248 * 295–309 | 536 * 561–629 | 6.24 * 1.71–8.0 | [55,56] |
Grape marc | 180–260 °C; 0.5–8 h; 1:3–1:7.5 | - 1.36–1.50; 0.53–0.60 | 20.6–21.6 * 20.9–26.3 | 215.3 * 233.5 | 517.7 * 531.0 | 4.5 * 4.2 | [54,57,58] | |
Straw powder | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:25 | 1.51 *; 0.61 * 1.17; 0.36 | 17.5 * 22.2 | [59] | ||||
Wood | 180–260 °C; 0.5–1.5 h; 1:10–1:12 | 0.12–2.11 *; 0.73–0.88 * 0.95–1.35; 0.36–0.58 | 0.24–0.40 * 0.27–1.53 | 18.0–19.0 * 19.5–24.0 | 279.0 * 278.9 | 617.0 * 636.5 | [9,51] | |
Tobacco stalk | 180–260 °C; 2–12 h; 1:20 | 1.57 *; 0.70 * 1.51–0.97; 0.19–0.68 | 0.20 * 0.21–1.15 | 18.8 * 18.7–27.2 | 287.1 * 294.4–342.8 | 541.0 * 529.4–558.5 | [60] | |
Saw dust | 220 °C; 10 h; 1:6 | 1.67 *; 0.75 * 1.25; 0.42 | 0.08 * 0.33 | 18.7 * 24.4 | [56] | |||
Sewage sludge | 180–280 °C; 2–12 h; 1:7.5–1:9 | 2.07 *; 0.52 * 1.77; 0.36 | 0.12 * 0.22 | 9.3 * 6.0 | 212.1–228.3 * 193.6–243.5 | 499.5–839.1 * 408.2–832.9 | 0.4–337 * 0.1–131 | [44,45] |
Urban waste/yard waste | 160–260 °C; 2–24 h; 1:10 | 1.46 *; 0.84 * 1.02–1.37; 0.40–0.81 | 15.4 * 15.7–24.6 | 272.3 * 312.1–320.5 | [61] | |||
Polyvinyl chloride | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:25 | - 1.05; 0.15 | 22.5 * 25.9 | [59] | ||||
Cow manure | 180–260 °C; 0.083–1 h; 1:5 | 1.28 *; 0.58 * 1.10–1.22; 0.32–0.55 | 0.13 * 0.11–0.28 | 16.7–19.1 * 18.8–22.1 | - 179.6 | - 588.8 | - 7.8 | [54] |
Sweet potato waste | 180–300 °C;0.5 h; 1:5 | 1.45 *; 0.53 * 0.94–1.35; 0.22–0.48 | 0.26 * 0.33–1.03 | 21.2 * 21.7–27.0 | 316.9 * 309.0–388.8 | 529.4 * 524.7–550.2 | 9.9 * 3.82–9.90 | [62] |
Paper sludge | 180–240 °C;0–2 h; 1:1 | 1.80 *; 0.68 * 1.60–1.40; 0.65–0.48 | 0.06 * 0.09–0.14 | [63] | ||||
Swine manure | 220 °C; 10 h; 1:6 | 1.85 *; 0.57 * 1.46; 0.26 | 0.01 * 0.15 | 18.1 * 23.1 | [56] | |||
Waste textile | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:12 | 0.12 *; 0.77 * - | 0.20 * 0.29 | 19.2 * - | 329.9 * 332.3 | 578.1 * 587.0 | [51] | |
Waste paper | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:12 | 2.10 *; 0.90 * - | 0.16 * 0.53 | 14.3 * - | 314.2 * 332.8 | 760.5 * 783.5 | [51] | |
Waste food | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:12 | 0.19–0.72 * - | 0.18 * 0.94 | 21.3 * - | 288.1 * 210.4 | 716.1 * 719.2 | [51] | |
Polyurethane | 200–260 °C; 0.5 h; 1:10 | 1.35 *; 0.38 * - | 0.03 * - | 34.1 * - | 315.0 - | 712.0 * - | 6.90 * - | [50] |
Straw powder and polyvinyl chloride | 240 °C; 0–2 h; 1:25 | - 1.01–1.27; 0.12–0.21 | - 24.5–27.6 | [59] | ||||
Corn stover and cow manure (3:1–1:3) | 220 °C; 1 h; 1:5 | - 19.5–21.2 | - 178.2–196.2 | - 480.7–530.5 | - 8.7–9.3 | [54] | ||
Grape marc and cow manure (3:1–1:3) | 220 °C; 1 h; 1:5 | - 21.1–23.1 | - 200.9–354.9 | - 492.7–585.3 | - 4.7–7.6 | [54] | ||
Sewage sludge + Rice straw (3:1–1:3) | 220 °C; 12 h; 1:7.5 | - 1.17–1.49; 0.35–0.36 | - 0.29–0.55 | - 8.8–16.8 | - 269.3–336.7 | - 461.4–525.2 | - 0.2–0.3 | [45] |
Sewage sludge + Orange peel (3:1–1:3) | 220 °C; 12 h; 1:7.5 | - 1.15–1.54; 0.21–0.29 | - 0.34–0.63 | - 10.1–21.0 | - 266.2–338.8 | - 479.2–508.3 | - 0.2–0.6 | [45] |
Sewage sludge + Peanut shell (3:1–1:3) | 220 °C; 12 h; 1:7.5 | - 1.13–1.51; 0.28–0.34 | - 0.39–0.79 | - 10.4–21.7 | - 276.2–349.2 | - 467.5–525.2 | - 0.3–0.6 | [45] |
Swine manure + sawdust (3:1–1:3) | 220 °C; 10 h; 1:6 | - 1.28–1.41; 0.31–0.37 | - 0.24–0.36 | - 23.2–24.1 | [56] | |||
Swine manure + corn stalk (3:1–1:3) | 220 °C; 10 h; 1:6 | - 1.30–1.45; 0.28–0.36 | - 0.25–0.33 | - 23.6–24.2 | [56] | |||
Waste textile + waste wood (3:1–1:3) | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:12 | - 0.90–1.20; 0.30–0.35 | - 0.60–1.22 | - 22.3–25.1 | [51] | |||
Waste textile + waste paper (3:1–1:3) | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:12 | - 0.95–1.20; 0.30–0.36 | - 0.39–0.56 | - 22.7–25.5 | [51] | |||
Waste textile + waste food (3:1–1:3) | 240 °C; 1.5 h; 1:12 | - 1.00–1.40; 0.20–0.40 | - 0.54–0.85 | - 22.0–26.9 | [51] | |||
Corn stover + polyurethane (5.7:1–19.0:1) | 200–260 °C; 0.5 h; 1:10 | - 0.82–1.38; 0.36–0.72 | - 0.22–0.64 | - 18.1–22.5 | - 325.0 | - 626.0–662.0 | - 2.03–4.60 | [50] |
2.2. Water Purification Using Hydrochar and Modified Hydrochar
2.2.1. Recent Advances on Dye Adsorption by Hydrochar
Feedstock | Dye | HTC (Ratio/Temperature/Time) | Modification/Production Temperature/Time | SBET (m2/g) | Qmax (mg/g) | Adsorption Isotherm & Mechanisms | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glucose | MG5, AR1 | Triethylenetetramine (TETA) powders, 190 °C, 48 h * | - NaOH was firstly impregnated then pyrolyzed at 800 °C and 3 h ** | - 233 ** | 13.9, 21.2 175 **, 156 ** | Langmuir For the glucose-activated carbon (GAC), ion exchange between the adsorbent and the MG5 played a key role in adsorption. As for AR1, the hydrogen bonding interactions between the nitrogen- and oxygen-containing functional groups on the dye and the GAC was responsible for the adsorption. | [65] |
Corn Stover | RhB | DW 230 °C, 30 min | - | 6.00 | 30.70 | Langmuir–Freundlich Surface pH, higher pore volume, and functional groups density influenced adsorption capacity compared to the control material. | [16] |
Orange Peel; Grape Skin | MB | DW 180–250 °C, 30 min | - | 46.16 | 51.02 | Langmuir The adsorption mechanism was owed to the density of the functional groups as it provided more active sites to adsorb dye molecules. | [66] |
Sewage Sludge | MB | Palatable Sludge + Digestate 190–250 °C, 3 h | - KOH ** Room temperature and 1 h ** | 31.00 0.29 ** | 70.51 247.06 ** | Langmuir Surface active sites, chemical interactions, and acid-base or redox equilibria between the MB molecules and the sewage sludge hydrochar. | [67] |
Bamboo Shoot Shell | RhB | DW 200 °C *, 5 h * | Pyrolysis treatment at 300, 600, 800 °C, 24 h ** | 513 | 85.8 | Freundlich More amounts of RhB are absorbed due to larger surface area and pore volume with smaller resistance for adsorbates diffusion into inner pores. | [85] |
Coconut Shell | MB | DW 200 °C, 2 h | NaOH (2:1) 600 °C, 1 h | 876.14 | 200.01 | Langmuir The optimum MB removal performance was owed to the mesoporosity, pore volume, and surface area present in the COSHTC (coconut shell HTC and NaOH chemical activation) | [25] |
PVC + Bamboo | MB | DW 200, 215, 230 °C, 24 h | - | 4.08 | 208.62 | - Electrostatic attraction by -N(CH3) +2 of MB and carboxylate of hydrochar and hydrogen bonding interactions via N atom of phenothiazine in MB and C-OH of hydrochar. | [79] |
Betel Nut Husk (BNH) | MB | DW 200 °C, 1 h | NaOH 500 °C, 1 h | 517.6 | 429.6 | Freundlich Electrostatic Forces of attraction proven to be one of the driving forces of MB adsorption due to the negatively charged surface on the activated BNH hydrochar (BNH-HAC). However, using the Boyd Model, the Film diffusion model was confirmed for the adsorption mechanism. | [73] |
Waste Shrimp Shell | MO | DW (180 °C, 12 h) | Acetic Acid for Acid etching (Room Temperature, 1.5 h) | 12.65 | 755.08 | Langmuir Adsorption performance of waste shrimp shell (WSS) hydrochar was mainly attributed to electrostatic interactions. | [86] |
Bamboo | MO | HCl 200 °C, 24 h | Epichlorohydrin for etherification (80 °C, 4 h) DW and Diethylenetriamine for amination (60 °C, 4 h) HCl for protonated reaction (Room temperature, 1 h) | 11.756 | 909.09 | Langmuir For the protonated amine-modified hydrochar (PAMH), electrostatic interaction played a key role on the sorption of MO. | [81] |
Bamboo Sawdust | MB | ZnCl2 with HCl (acid washing) One-Pot (200 °C, 7 h) One-Pot + Acid Rinse (200 °C, 7 h) | - | 29.6 | 47.3 | - High Oxygen functional group content, aromaticity, and surface area led to an increase in adsorption ability of MB onto the modified hydrochar. | [80] |
Pinewood | MB | DW 300 °C, 4 h | Oxone + NaCl (catalyst) Room temperature, 24 h | 7.662 | 86.7 | Langmuir Chemical interaction between adsorbent carboxylate anion and cationic adsorbates with minor physical interactions. | [76] |
Coffee Husk | MB | DW 180 °C, 6 h | KOH 700 °C, 4 h | 703.9 | 357.38 | Langmuir High uptake of MB dye was observed for coffee-derived activated carbon with high amount of oxygen-containing functional groups. | [71] |
Coffee Husk | MB | DW 220 °C 6 h | FeCl3 · 6H2O + FeSO4 · 7H2 O Ammonia Solution Co-precipitation: (80 °C, 30 min) | - | 78 | Freundlich Thermodynamic properties indicated the adsorption mechanism for MB removal to be a physical process between the magnetic composite of coffee husk hydrochar-Fe3 O4 (MCHH) and MB. | [84] |
Olive Oil Cake | MB | DW 150–300 °C, 2–8 h | KOH, NaOH, H2O2, or NH2CONH2 Room temperature, 1 h | 7.11 | 270.3 | Temkin Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic, and coordinate interactions were the dominant factors influencing the adsorption of MB onto the olive oil derived activated carbon. | [88] |
Distillers Grains | MB | Ultrapure Water with Attapulgite/Vermiculite 180 °C, 6 h | - | - | 340.3 | - Electrostatic attraction, ion exchange, complexation, and physical adsorption controlled the adsorption process for the derived hydrochar-clay composites. | [70] |
Sugar Cane Bagasse | MB | H3PO4 240 °C, 10 h | NaOH Ambient temperature, 2 h | 15.34 | 357.14 | - MB uptake was mainly attributed to the electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, π-π interaction, and intra-particle diffusion due to the functional groups and porous structure present in AHC (activated hydrochar). | [69] |
Golden shower | MG5 | 190 °C, 24 h | Pyrolysis (800 °C, 4 h) K2CO3 was used for activation (80 °C, 24 h) | 903 | 531 | Langmuir Adsorption process was dominated by the π-π interactions and pore filling mechanisms. | [72] |
Teak Sawdust | MB | DW 190 °C, 24 h | K2CO3/ZnCl2 800 °C, 4 h | 1757 | 614 | - Electrostatic force is the primary adsorption mechanism for the MB removal with an increasing amount of oxygen-containing functional groups also playing an important role in capture. | [87] |
Bamboo Sawdust/Powder | MB | DW [81]; Acrylic Acid + Ammonium Persulphate + DW [80] 200 °C, 24 h [80,81] | NaOH Room temperature, 1 h [81]; 2 h [80] | 26.249; 5.03 | 655.76; 717.78 | Langmuir [80,81] Due to the large surface area, pore volume, and increased amount of oxygen-containing functional groups, high MB adsorption was achieved for the derived modified bamboo hydrochar [81]. Electrostatic interaction presented as the main factor for MB adsorption [80]. | [74,77] |
Rice Straw | MO | Ferric Sulfate, Ferric Chloride, DW, NaOH 180 °C, 6 h | Epchlorohydrin + DMF for etherification (100 °C, 1 h) Pyridine (1 h) and Trimethylamine (3 h) for amination | - | 849 | Langmuir For MO removal, primarily electrostatic attraction and ion exchange influenced the adsorption mechanism between the dye and the quaternary ammonium-functionalized rice straw hydrochar. | [75] |
Bamboo Powder | MB + MO [69] MB [72,87] | HCl [69,72,87] 200 °C, 24 h [69,72] | Epichlorohydrin for Etherification (80 °C, 4 h) [69,87] Water/Diethylenetriamine for Amination (60 °C, 4 h) [69,87] FeCl3 · 6H2O + FeSO4·7H2O for Chemical Coprecipitation (Room temperature, overnight) [69] NaOH + Water + Ethanol for Carboxylated Reaction (60 °C, 4 h) [87] Maleic Anhydride + NaHCO3 140 °C, 6 h [72] | 26.94; 28.189; - | 148.84; 1155.57; 1238.66 | Langmuir [69,72,87] Selective removal of MB onto Fe3O4-loaded PAMH (Fe3O4-PAMH) due to electrostatic interaction at acidic/alkaline conditions [69]. π -π interaction, electrostatic attraction, and hydrogen bonding between MB and the carboxylate-functionalized hydrochar (CFHC) were the main mechanisms for MB removal [72]. Π-π interaction, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic attraction dominated MB capture between the polyaminocarboxylated modified hydrochar (ACHC) with MB [87]. | [24,82,83] |
Bamboo Shoot Shell | RhB | 1 wt% H2SO4 200 °C, 24 h | Melamine for pre-carbonization (600 °C 4 h) KOH for chemical activation (600–800 °C, 1 h) | 3250 | 3860 | Langmuir Adsorption was governed by synergistic effects of large surface areas, hierarchical architecture, and partial N-species for pyrrolic-N coordination. | [78] |
Glucose (10 wt% glucose water) | RhB | 190 °C, 18 h | Air oxidation for oxidation (300 °C) then mixed with Urea KOH for chemical activation (600–800 °C, 1 h) | 3282 | 5181 | Langmuir For the N-doped hierarchical carbons, the adsorption performance was credited to the synergistic effects of high surface areas, hierarchical pores and pyrrolic N in the structure. | [26] |
2.2.2. Heavy Metals Removal from Water by Hydrochar and Activated Hydrochar
Feedstock | Metal | HTC Condition and Chemical Modification | Adsorption Condition | BET (m2/g) | Qe (mg/g) | Adsorption Isotherm, Thermodynamics and Mechanism | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avocado Seed | Ni2+ Cu2+ Pb2+ | S/W = 1.5 * 250 °C, 12 h * | 120 rpm 24 h 25–40 °C | 40.54 | 9.39–20.54 8.89–13.98 24.86–49.72 | - Endothermic Surface functional groups (phenolic and carboxylic) interaction with several metallic ions (multiionic process), Van der Waals force, and electrostatic interaction. | [90] |
Rice Straw | Cu2+ Zn2+ | S/W = (1:10) * 200 °C, 70 min * | 170 rpm, 25 °C, 8 h | 16.03 | 144.9 112.8 | Langmuir Spontaneous and Exothermic Presence of oxygen containing functional groups, higher pore volume, and rough surface | [91] |
Rice Straw | Pb2+, Cu2+ | FeCl3 (1: 3) ** 200 °C, 3 h * 200 °C, 3 h ** | 150 rmp, 25 h 30 °C | 39.9 44.3 | 6.75 4.0 | Langmuir Spontaneous and Endothermic Surface complexation with surface functional groups (carbonyl, carboxyl, and anhydride) | [96] |
Peanut Hull | Pb2+ Cd2+ Cu2+ Ni2+ | S/W = 3:20 * 10% H2 O2 solution ** 300 °C, 5 h * 22 ± 0.5 °C, 2 h ** | 24 h, 22 ± 0.5 °C | 1.3 1.4 | 1.40 | Freundlich - | [92] |
0.07–22.84 | Langmuir - High carboxyl surface functional groups Surface exchange reaction like complexation mechanism | ||||||
Corn cob straw | Cu2+ Zn2+ | S/W = (1:6) * 200 mL HCl(1N)/NaOH(3N), PEI/methanol solution (10% (w/v) ** 200 °C, 0.5 h * 160 rpm, 30 °C, 24 h ** | 180 rpm, 4 h, 25 °C | 2.09 Acid-PEI-HC: 2.10 Alkali-PEI-HC: 3.98 | 47.0–56.1 152.2–207.6 | Freundlich - –N–Zn/Cu (II) complex formation and electrostatic interaction of –NH3+ & –NO3− ions with metals contributed to ion adsorption Metal ions were adsorbed by acid-PEI-HC, and nitrogen chelation was primarily in control. However, the adsorption process for alkali-PEI-HC also involved groups that contained oxygen. | [93] |
Poultry Litter with straw | Cr6+ | DI water * H2SO4 * 250 °C, 2 h * 250 °C, 2 h ** | 24 h 20 °C | 7.1 3.5 | 26.2 | Langmuir Spontaneous and Endothermic The elimination mechanism may be influenced by redox reactions, ion exchange, and electrostatic interactions. | [94] |
Bamboo powder | Cu2+ | HCl * NaOH ** Epichlorohydrin, water/ diethylenetriamine solution NaOH, DI water, ethanol, monochloroacetic acid ** 200 °C, 24 h * 80 °C, 4 h ** 60 °C, 4 h ** | 110 rpm, 30–50 °C, 12 h | - | 139.60–143.96 | Langmuir Endothermic, Spontaneous. Electrostatic attraction and chelation attraction of metal ions with surface functionalities contributed to the adsorption process. | [82] |
Sewage Sludge | Pb2+ | Mg(NO3)2.6H2O, urea Al(NO3)3.9H2O, DI water ** 120 °C, 24 h * Centrifugal washing ** | 150 rpm, 25 °C, 24 h | - | 85.78 | Langmuir - Contribution of physical (Van der Waals) and chemical adsorption (functional groups). Coordination effect induced by N2 in the surface, surface coprecipitation, and electrostatic interaction played a major role in lead adsorption. | [95] |
Bamboo powder | Cd2+ | HCl * Maleic anhydride (1:2), NaHCO3 ** 200 °C, 24 h * 140 °C, 6 h ** | 110 rpm, 30 °C, 24 h | 45.795 28.189 | 90.74 | Langmuir Spontaneous and Endothermic Surface complexation between Cd2+ and surface oxygen functional groups along with ion exchange between K+ and Cd2+ had a significant role in adsorption. | [83] |
Eucalyptus sawdust, Corn straw, Corn cob | Cr6+ | S/W = (1:8) * KOH (1:50)(w/v) ** 220 °C, 0.5 h * 30 °C, 1 h ** | 180 rpm, 25 °C, 8 h | 17.48 16.08 15.80 | 29.46–34.07 | - - Alkali modification improved the blocked pores which resulted in higher adsorption. | [98] |
Pinewood sawdust | Pb2+ | S/W = 1:6 * 20% H2O2 solution ** 260 °C, 2 h * 300 rpm, 30 °C, 6 h ** | 200 rpm, 25 °C, 24 h | — | 92.80 | Freundlich - Functional group (carboxyl and hydroxyl) complexation and π-interaction contributed to metal ion adsorption. | [99] |
Corn straw | Pb2+ | 25%(v/v) H3PO4, PEI-Methanol (1:10) solution ** 240 °C, 2 h * 200 rpm, 30 °C, 12 h ** | 150 rpm, 25 °C, 12 h | 11.3 7.2 22.5 | 32.67 214.0 353.4 | - - Oxygen-rich functional group, Carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, along with nitrogen-rich functional groups, contribute to adsorption process through ion exchange, hydrogen bonding. | [97] |
2.2.3. Toxin Removal from Water by Hydrochars and Activated Hydrochars
Feedstock | Toxins | Chemical Modifier (Ratio) Production Temperature and Time | Adsorption Condition | BET (m2/g) | Qe (mg/g) | Adsorption Isotherm, Thermodynamics and Mechanism | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brewer’s spent grain | Acetaminophen | S/W = 1:8 * KOH(1:4) ** 220 °C, 16 h * 800 °C, 1 h ** | 150 rpm, 30 °C, 24 h | 9.65 1512.83 | - 318.003 | Langmuir Hydrogen bond interaction between -O-H of AHC and N-H groups of acetaminophens Π-π interaction between aromatic rings of AHC and acetaminophen | [113] |
Flax shives Oat hull | Carbamazepine | H3PO4, NaOH * Steam ** 220 °C, 16 h * 850 °C, 1 h ** | 220 rpm, 20–40 °C | 2–793 2.41–602 | 47–97 50–99 | Endothermic Presence of hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups Interconnections between electron donors and acceptors Hydrogen bonding | [115] |
Sucrose | Paracetamol, Iopamidol | DI water * Steam, KOH, K2CO3 ** 190 °C, 5 h * 800 °C, 1 h ** | 700 rpm, 30 °C, 24 h | 814–2431 | 471.8–513.5 150.9–1049.6 | Langmuir Larger micropores of KOH-treated HC improved removal efficiency | [103] |
Olive mill waste | Triclosan, Ibuprofen, Diclofenac | S/W = 3:7 * 190–240 °C, 6 h * | 20 ± 1 °C, 24 h | 7.470–7.624 | 10–13.8 | Freundlich Higher oxygen containing functional groups forming bonding with pharmaceutical toxins | [105] |
Fruit powder of Zizipus mautitiana | Diclofenac, Ibuprofen | S/W = 2:5 * 200 °C, 20 h * | 120 rpm, 30 °C, 2 h | 1160 | 752.21 206.96 | Dubinin–Raduskevich (physisorption) High surface area and presence of polar functional group Physical attraction by pore filling mechanism in a monolayer and multilayer adsorption | [106] |
Palm kernel shell | Diclofenac | S:W = 1:5 * Nitrogen ** 200 °C, 4 h * 400 °C, 4 h ** | 200 rpm, 25 °C, 1.5 h | 22 131 | 13.16 | Langmuir Hydrogen bond formation with diarylamine and carboxyl groups; Van der Waals attraction with non-polar groups; π-π interaction with aromatic rings. | [102] |
Orange peel | Diclofenac Salicylic acid Flurbiprofen | S/W = 1:10 * CO2, Air, H3PO4 ** 200 °C, 20 h * 300–750 °C, 1.5 h ** 600 °C, 1 h ** | 500 rpm, 25 ± 1 °C, 1.5 h | 117 301–618 | 5.33–62.46 12.43–91.16 148.99–202.73 | - Higher surface area and mesoporosity Hydrogen bonding | [116] |
Olive stones | Diclofenac | 10% H2SO4 (1:1) * 550 °C, 1 h * | 500 rpm, 23 ± 2 °C, 3 h | 83.72 | 3.10 | Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) Film diffusion and intraparticle diffusion Availability of functional group | [104] |
Leaves of Saccarum ravnnae and Saccarum officinarum | Diclofenac Ibuprofen Naproxen | S/W = 1:8 * 220 °C, 9 h * | 180 rpm, Room temperature,12 h | 26.21–27.26 | 62.02–230.04 | Langmuir Hydrophobic, Van der Waals force, Surface interaction (π-π interaction) and hydrogen bonding The presence of oxygen rich functional groups (hydroxyl and carboxyl groups) | [108] |
Poplar sawdust | Tetracycline | S/W = 1:10 * Air, Pure N2 ** 220 °C, 8 h * 300–700 °C, 3 h ** | 25 °C, 72 h | 7.5 314.4–358.6 557.6–618.02 | 6.25 33.32–196.71 6.22–22.21 | Freundlich Micropore filling, π-π interaction, electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding | [112] |
Lettuce Taro Watermelon peel | 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy | S/W = 1:25 * 180–240 °C, 2 h * | 180 rpm, 25 ± 1 °C, 72 h | 3.67–6.90 9.23–0.86 3.29–8.45 | 80–88.4 35.5–90.2 59.7–88.4 | - Mesoporous structure, greater C-O functional group Partitioning and chemisorption | [109] |
Pine fruit shell | Bisphenol | S/W = 5:37 * NaOH (1: 3) ** 190 °C, 24–72 h * 700 °C, 1.5 h ** | 150 rpm, 25 °C, 24 h | 90–2220 | 332.52–378.77 | Monolayer adsorption Physical adsorption, electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bond and π-π interaction | [111] |
Avocado seed | 2-Nitrophenol | S/W = 1:1 * 200 °C, 12 h * | 120 rpm, 25 °C, 48 h | 18.40 | 562.37 | Henry isotherm Greater cavity in the adsorbent surface Electrostatic interaction | [107] |
Rice husk | Berberine chloride Tetracycline | S/W = 1:6 * KOH, NH4OH, H2SO4, HNO3, H3PO4 ** 200 °C, 3.5 h * 170 rpm, 25 °C, 3 h ** | 170 rpm, 25 °C, 8 h | 1.74–12.18 | 281–352 294–419 | Langmuir isotherm Oxygen rich functional groups initiates chemical adsorption Physical adsorption dominant | [114] |
tomato- and olive-press wastes, rice husks, and horse manure | Octhilinone, Triclosan, Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole, Ciprofloxacin, Diclofenac, Paracetamol, Diphenhydramine, Fluconazole, and Bisphenol A | Ultrapure water * 220 °C, 2 h * | 20 °C, 25 min | 0.65–16.92 | 0.0001- 0.002 | Hydrophobic molecules get adsorbed via hydrophobic attraction Hydrophilic molecules get adsorbed through electrostatic interaction The polar surface of the char improves adsorption of polar molecules through H-bonding | [110] |
Paper board mill sludge | Diclofenac | KOH (1:2) ** 200 °C, 10 h * 600 °C, 1 h ** | 50 rpm, 15 h | 19.59 53.32 | 28.818 31.746 | Langmuir Physisorption and chemisorption Electrostatic interaction with positively charged surface, hydrophobic effect, Van der Waals force Greater amount of oxygen rich functional group | [117] |
2.3. Greenhouse Gas Adsorption by Activated Hydrochar
2.3.1. CO2 Adsorption
CO2 | |||||||||
Precursor | Activation/ Modification | Carbonization Condition (Temp/Time) | Activation Condition (Temp/Time) | BET SSA (m2/g) | VT (cm3/g) | Vu (cm3/g) | Gas Uptake (mmol/g) | Favorable Feature | Ref. |
Sawdust | KOH Activation | 250/2 | 600/1 | 1260 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 4.8 | Bimodal pores in micro–mesopore range | [118] |
Empty Fruit Branch from Oil Palm | KOH Activation | 150–350/0.33 | 800/0.5 | 2510 | 1.05 | 0.55 | 3.71 | High and diverse distribution of functional groups, large specific surface area and micropore volume | [142] |
Jujun Grass | KOH Activation | 250/2 | 700/1 | 3144 | 1.56 | 1.23 | 4.1 | High surface area, highly microporous (95% of surface area and 84% of pore volume) | [121] |
Camellia Japonica | KOH Activation | 250/2 | 700/1 | 1353 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 5.0 | ||
Potato Starch | MelamineandKOH Activation | 250/2 | 800/1 | 3000 | 1.41 | 1.09 | 2.8 | Narrow microporosity in the microporous carbons | [127] |
Cellulose | Melamine and KOH Activation | 250/2 | 800/1 | 3100 | 1.46 | 1.05 | 2.8 | ||
Eucalyptus Sawdust | Melamine and KOH Activation | 250/2 | 800/1 | 3420 | 2.30 | 1.16 | 2.2 | ||
Camphor Leaves | KOH Activation | 180–300/5 | 800/1 | 1633 | 0.98 | 0.58 | 0.8 | Large specific surface area | [139] |
Micro Algae | K2CO3 Activation | 180/10 | 700/2 | 1396 | 0.75 | 0.59 | 4.2 | Ultra-micropores and a polar surface of heteroatom-containing (e.g., O, N) species | [122] |
800/4 | 1904 | 1.08 | 0.46 | 3.5 | |||||
Lotus Stem | KOH Activation | 180/24 | 800/1 | 2091 | 0.87 | 0.65 | 3.85 | Microporosity and micropore size distribution. | [123] |
Garlic Peel | KOH Activation | 200/2 (4) | 700/1 | 1248 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 4.2 | High microporosity (up to 98%) | [128,144] |
Rice Husk | KOH Activation | 200/6 | 700/1 | 1190 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 4.48 | Ultra-micropores (centered at 0.37 nm and 0.53 nm) | [124] |
Pineapple Waste | K2C2O4 Na2C2O4 Li2C2O4 | 210/10 | 700/2 | 1076 | 0.49 | - | 1.59–4.25 | High surface area and micropores, pyrrolic-/pyridinic-N functional groups | [145] |
Tobacco Stalk | N2 pyrolysis | 220/6 | 700/1 | 2145 | 1.00 | 0.683 | 4.83 | Nitrogen content and micropore volume | [129] |
Glucose | KOH activation | 180/12 | 700/1 | 2659 | 1.40 | 1.21 | 4.24 | Narrow micropores volume | [130] |
Corn Cob | KOH/ZnCl2/H3PO4 activation | 230/8 | 600/1 | 1222 | 0.711 | 0.620 | 4.5 # | High surface area and pore volume | [140] |
CH4 | |||||||||
Precursor | Activation/ Modification | Carbonization Condition | Adsorption Condition | BET SSA (m2/g) | VT (cm3/g) | Vu (cm3/g) | Gas Uptake (mmol/g) | Favorable Feature | Ref. |
Cellulose | Agent: 50 wt% ZnCl2 solution | 250 °C, 3 h, | 298 K, 36.5 bar | 383–1293 | 0.27–0.87 | 0.24–0.43 | 6.42 | High Vmicro/Vtotal ratio, suitable average pore diameter, specific surface area | [146] |
N2 flow of 250 mL/min for 1 h | 200 °C, 24 h | 273 K, 1 bar | 416 | - | - | 1.25 | Unfavored by Si and Fe doping | [147] | |
Sucrose | Temperature: 500, 600, 700, 800℃ | 190 °C, 5 h | 298 K, 10 bar | 1375–2431 | 0.63–1.14 | 0.58–0.90 | 90 * (v/v) | High packing densities (∼0.9 g cm−3), high surface area and micropore sizes (0.8 nm) | [148] |
Starch | Agent/Precursor: 0.5, 1, 1.5 | 190 °C, 6 h | 298 K, 20 bar | 3350 | 1.75 | 1.10 | 10.7 | Large specific surface area and micropore volume | [149] |
Glucose | Agent: K2CO3 and KOH | In situ doping with 5 wt% Fe2O3 or 5 wt% SiO2 | 273 K, 1 bar | 576–1549 | 0.23–0.62 | 0.20–0.55 | 3.38 | Largest ultra-micropore volume and pore size distributed within 0.4–0.7 nm. | [126] |
2.3.2. CH4 Adsorption
2.4. Hydrochar as Catalyst Support
Feedstock | HTC Process Conditions (Temperature, Time) °C, Hour | SBET (m2/g) | Dp (nm) | Vp (cm3/g) | Applications | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lignin | 400, 1 | 10.7 | - | - | Biodiesel production | [184] |
Glucose | 180, 4 | 189 | 2.6 | 0.19 | [185] | |
Red liquid solid | 200, 12 | - | - | - | [186] | |
Chitosan | 180, 8 | 164 | 1.3 | 0.35 | Esterification reaction | [187] |
Acai seed | 130, 6 | 0.70 | 147 | 0.06 | Esterification reaction (oleic acid and methanol) | [188] |
Corncob | 200, 10 | 8.76 | 29.5 | 0.07 | Esterification (palm fatty acid distillate) | [189] |
Cellulose | 220,4 | 626 | - | 0.17 | Glucose isomerization to fructose | [190] |
Kenaf core | 105, 6 | - | - | - | Cellulose hydrolysis | [191] |
Glucose | 180, 24 | - | - | - | Butanolysis of furfuryl alcohol | [192] |
Chitosan | 200, 12 | 523 | 0.49 | Catalyst for oxygen reduction reactions | [181] | |
Chitosan | 180, 12 | - | - | - | Catalyst for methanol electrooxidation | [193] |
Sugarcane, Malt and Chia seed bagasse | 200, 3 | 447 | - | 0.32 | Wet peroxide oxidation of micro-pollutants | [166] |
Glucose | 180, 10 | 23.4 | - | - | Carbamazepine removal | [182] |
Cattle manure | 250, 4 | 33.45 | 10.9 | 0.09 | As(V) removal | [170] |
Gum Tragacanth | 180, 2 | - | - | - | Phenol removal | [194] |
Lignin (alkali) | 200, 18 | - | - | - | Phenol removal | [171] |
Pinewood sawdust | 200, 1 | 373 | 6.5 | 0.25 | Biomass steam reforming | [195] |
Sugarcane bagasse | 240, 10 | 278 | 14.7 | 0.28 | Dry Reforming of Methane and Carbon Dioxide | [174] |
Poplar wood | 220, 2 | 1.79 | 6.59 | 0.0 | Degradation of DDT | [173] |
Corn Stalk | 240, 3 | 4.79 | 1.44 | 0.02 | Degradation of cellulose | [196] |
Watermelon peel, banana peel and bay leaves | 240, 1 | 5.15 | 46.9 | 0.009 | Degradation of malachite green | [197] |
Pinewood | 180, 24 (annealing for N-doping: 600 °C, 1 h, N2 atmosphere) | 263 | 11.0 | 0.106 | Degradation of Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (bisphenol A, bisphenol F, estrone, and 17β-estradiol) | [180] |
Glucose | 240, 16 | 343 | 3.85 | 0.169 | Reductive amination of benzaldehyde | [198] |
Pine sawdust | 200, 4 | 460 | 3.91 | 0.25 | Catalytic cracking of biomass tar | [199] |
Chitosan | 180, 10 | - | - | - | Catalyst for Ullmann CeN coupling reaction | [200] |
2.5. Electrochemical Applications of Hydrochar
2.6. Role of Hydrochar as Soil Amendment and Carbon Sequestration
Hydrochar Feedstock | Usage Rate | Impact on Soil Properties | Crop Type | Crop Response | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poultry litter | 0.5%, 1.0% (w/w) | Improved soil water retention Acted as a slow-release fertilizer Decreased nitrate leaching | Lettuce | Improved plant growth up to 3-fold | [222] |
Sawdust | 5%, 15% (w/w) | Reduced N2O emissions | Rice | Increased grain yield by 16.6–19.3% | [244] |
Digestate | 100 kg N/ha | Hydrochar treatment reduced mean CO2 emissions | Miscanthus | No change in the crop yield | [246] |
Sewage sludge | 5 and 25 ton/ha | Application of low temperature derived hydrochar showed nitrogen fertilization potential | Perennial ryegrass | Improved biomass production about 70% Usages rate did not significantly alter the biomass production | [215] |
Corn silage | 9.2 g N/75 kg soil, 30 ton C/ha | Increased soil carbon and nitrogen | Poplar | Positive effect on the biomass productivity | [241,242] |
0.7% (w/w) | Increased biological nitrogen fixation | Soybean | Increased plant growth about 3.5 times | [217] | |
20% (v/v) | Preserved more native soil C | Wheat and colza | Hydrochar limits plant growth | [22] | |
Biosolids | 50% (v/v) | Increased porosity and water holding capacity | Perennial ryegrass | Increased production by 184% | [233] |
Forest waste | 10, 25, 50% (v/v) | Sequester more carbon Caused nitrogen immobilization | Myrtle and mastic | Increased seed germination up to 18% and decreased stem weight up to 75% | [230] |
Miscanthus | 14.5 ton/ha | Improved the carbon sequestration potential Reduced ammonia emissions | Perennial ryegrass | Reduced the growth yield about 10% | [248] |
1.45 kg/m2 | Nitrogen and potassium concentrations enriched | Grasses and forbs | Biomass yield was not affected | [216] | |
Beet-root chips | 2% (w/w) | Reduced nitrogen concentration in soil Increased soil pH | Barley, phaseolus bean, leek | Promoted biomass production | [219] |
Poplar | 1, 2.5, 5% (w/w). | Decreased nitrogen availability No effect on metal concentrations | Oat | Reduced biomass production by 14–50% | [218] |
2.7. Nutrient Recovery
3. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Trash in America. Available online: https://environmentamerica.org/center/resources/trash-in-america-2/ (accessed on 12 September 2022).
- Ahmed Khan, T.; Kim, H.-J.; Gupta, A.; Jamari, S.S.; Jose, R. Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon Microspheres from Rubber Wood by Hydrothermal Carbonization. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 1374–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.A.; Saud, A.S.; Jamari, S.S.; Rahim, M.H.A.; Park, J.-W.; Kim, H.-J. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Carbon Rich Material Preparation: A Review. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 130, 105384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirtania, K. Chapter 4—Thermochemical Conversion Processes for Waste Biorefinery. In Waste Biorefinery; Bhaskar, T., Pandey, A., Mohan, S.V., Lee, D.-J., Khanal, S.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 129–156. ISBN 978-0-444-63992-9. [Google Scholar]
- Antero, R.V.P.; Alves, A.C.F.; de Oliveira, S.B.; Ojala, S.A.; Brum, S.S. Challenges and Alternatives for the Adequacy of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Lignocellulosic Biomass in Cleaner Production Systems: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y. A Review on Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass and Plastic Wastes to Energy Products. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 134, 105479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reza, M.T.; Lynam, J.G.; Uddin, M.H.; Coronella, C.J. Hydrothermal Carbonization: Fate of Inorganics. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 49, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruse, A.; Dahmen, N. Hydrothermal Biomass Conversion: Quo Vadis? J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 134, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.T.; Sultana, A.I.; Saha, N.; Klinger, J.L.; Reza, M.T. Pretreatment of Biomass by Selected Type-III Deep Eutectic Solvents and Evaluation of the Pretreatment Effects on Hydrothermal Carbonization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 15479–15491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Zhai, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Zeng, G. A Review of the Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass Waste for Hydrochar Formation: Process Conditions, Fundamentals, and Physicochemical Properties. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidari, M.; Dutta, A.; Acharya, B.; Mahmud, S. A Review of the Current Knowledge and Challenges of Hydrothermal Carbonization for Biomass Conversion. J. Energy Inst. 2019, 92, 1779–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.T.; Saha, N.; Hernandez, S.; Klinger, J.; Reza, M.T. Integration of Air Classification and Hydrothermal Carbonization to Enhance Energy Recovery of Corn Stover. Energies 2021, 14, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.T.; Chambers, C.; Klinger, J.L.; Reza, M.T. Blending Hydrochar Improves Hydrophobic Properties of Corn Stover Pellets. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, A.I.; Reza, M.T. Investigation of Hydrothermal Carbonization and Chemical Activation Process Conditions on Hydrogen Storage in Loblolly Pine-Derived Superactivated Hydrochars. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 26422–26434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A.B.; Mokaya, R. High Density Hydrogen Storage in Superactivated Carbons from Hydrothermally Carbonized Renewable Organic Materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1400–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Islam, M.T.; Chambers, C.; Toufiq Reza, M. Effects of Process Liquid Recirculation on Material Properties of Hydrochar and Corresponding Adsorption of Cationic Dye. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 161, 105418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hien Tran, T.; Le, A.H.; Pham, T.H.; Duong, L.D.; Nguyen, X.C.; Nadda, A.K.; Chang, S.W.; Chung, W.J.; Nguyen, D.D.; Nguyen, D.T. A Sustainable, Low-Cost Carbonaceous Hydrochar Adsorbent for Methylene Blue Adsorption Derived from Corncobs. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parlavecchia, M.; Carnimeo, C.; Loffredo, E. Soil Amendment with Biochar, Hydrochar and Compost Mitigates the Accumulation of Emerging Pollutants in Rocket Salad Plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malool, M.E.; Keshavarz Moraveji, M.; Shayegan, J. Optimized Production, Pb(II) Adsorption and Characterization of Alkali Modified Hydrochar from Sugarcane Bagasse. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tien, B.; Xu, M.; Liu, J. Synthesis and Electrochemical Characterization of Carbon Spheres as Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Battery. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 1465–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auer, E.; Freund, A.; Pietsch, J.; Tacke, T. Carbons as Supports for Industrial Precious Metal Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1998, 173, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malghani, S.; Jüschke, E.; Baumert, J.; Thuille, A.; Antonietti, M.; Trumbore, S.; Gleixner, G. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Hydrothermal Carbonization Char (Hydrochar) in Two Contrasting Soils; Results of a 1-Year Field Study. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2015, 51, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, A.I.; Saha, N.; Reza, M.T. Synopsis of Factors Affecting Hydrogen Storage in Biomass-Derived Activated Carbons. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.-L.; Qian, W.-C.; Guo, J.-Z.; Shen, Y.; Li, B. Selective Removal of Anionic and Cationic Dyes by Magnetic Fe3O4-Loaded Amine-Modified Hydrochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 320, 124374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Islam, M.A.; Ahmed, M.J.; Khanday, W.A.; Asif, M.; Hameed, B.H. Mesoporous Activated Coconut Shell-Derived Hydrochar Prepared via Hydrothermal Carbonization-NaOH Activation for Methylene Blue Adsorption. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hou, Z.; Tao, Y.; Bai, T.; Liang, Y.; Huang, S.; Cai, J. Efficient Rhodamine B Removal by N-Doped Hierarchical Carbons Obtained from KOH Activation and Urea-Oxidation of Glucose Hydrochar. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, A.I.; Saha, N.; Reza, M.T. Upcycling Simulated Food Wastes into Superactivated Hydrochar for Remarkable Hydrogen Storage. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 159, 105322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, A.I.; Chambers, C.; Ahmed, M.M.N.; Pathirathna, P.; Reza, T. Multifunctional Loblolly Pine-Derived Superactivated Hydrochar: Effect of Hydrothermal Carbonization on Hydrogen and Electron Storage with Carbon Dioxide and Dye Removal. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Document Search—Web of Science Core Collection. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/basic-search (accessed on 22 September 2022).
- Hoekman, S.K.; Broch, A.; Warren, A.; Felix, L.; Irvin, J. Laboratory Pelletization of Hydrochar from Woody Biomass. Biofuels 2014, 5, 651–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kambo, H.S.; Dutta, A. Strength, Storage, and Combustion Characteristics of Densified Lignocellulosic Biomass Produced via Torrefaction and Hydrothermal Carbonization. Appl. Energy 2014, 135, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadjadi, S.; Karimi, B. Chapter 2—Heteroatom-Doped Carbon Materials Derived from Ionic Liquids for Catalytic Applications. In Emerging Carbon Materials for Catalysis; Sadjadi, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 33–72. ISBN 978-0-12-817561-3. [Google Scholar]
- Hoekman, S.K.; Broch, A.; Robbins, C. Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 1802–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nizamuddin, S.; Baloch, H.A.; Griffin, G.J.; Mubarak, N.M.; Bhutto, A.W.; Abro, R.; Mazari, S.A.; Ali, B.S. An Overview of Effect of Process Parameters on Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 1289–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynam, J.G.; Reza, M.T.; Yan, W.; Vásquez, V.R.; Coronella, C.J. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Various Lignocellulosic Biomass. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2015, 5, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardhan, M.; Novera, T.M.; Tabassum, M.; Islam, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Hameed, B.H. Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Different Feedstocks to Hydrochar as Potential Energy for the Future World: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 298, 126734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saba, A.; Saha, P.; Reza, M.T. Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Coal-Biomass Blend: Influence of Temperature on Solid Fuel Properties. Fuel Process. Technol. 2017, 167, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mumme, J.; Titirici, M.-M.; Pfeiffer, A.; Lüder, U.; Reza, M.T.; Mašek, O. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Digestate in the Presence of Zeolite: Process Efficiency and Composite Properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2967–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Qi, R.; Zhang, D.; Gao, Y.; Xiong, M.; Chen, W. Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Cotton Textile Waste and Polyvinyl Chloride Waste for the Production of Solid Fuel: Interaction Mechanisms and Combustion Behaviors. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tekin, K.; Karagöz, S.; Bektaş, S. A Review of Hydrothermal Biomass Processing. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 673–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Krevelen, D.W. Coal, 3rd ed; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/books/coal/van-krevelen/978-0-444-89586-8 (accessed on 13 September 2022).
- Trif-Tordai, G.; Ionel, I. Waste Biomass as Alternative Bio-Fuel—Co-Firing versus Direct Combustion; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; ISBN 978-953-307-372-9. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, M.T.; Klinger, J.L.; Toufiq Reza, M. Evaluating Combustion Characteristics and Combustion Kinetics of Corn Stover-Derived Hydrochars by Cone Calorimeter. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 452, 139419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Zheng, X.; Ying, Z.; Feng, Y.; Wang, B.; Dou, B. Hydrochar Prepared from Municipal Sewage Sludge as Renewable Fuels: Evaluation of Its Devolatilization Performance, Reaction Mechanism, and Thermodynamic Property. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Zhang, Z.; Ge, C.; Liu, W.; Tang, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Qiu, R. Synergistic Effect of Hydrothermal Co-Carbonization of Sewage Sludge with Fruit and Agricultural Wastes on Hydrochar Fuel Quality and Combustion Behavior. Waste Manag. 2019, 100, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suryaningsih, S.; Nurhilal, O.; Yuliah, Y.; Mulyana, C. Combustion Quality Analysis of Briquettes from Variety of Agricultural Waste as Source of Alternative Fuels. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 65, 012012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burning of Wood. Available online: http://virtual.vtt.fi/virtual/innofirewood/stateoftheart/database/burning/burning.html (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- Liu, Z.; Quek, A.; Kent Hoekman, S.; Srinivasan, M.P.; Balasubramanian, R. Thermogravimetric Investigation of Hydrochar-Lignite Co-Combustion. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 123, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haykırı-Açma, H. Combustion Characteristics of Different Biomass Materials. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003, 44, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.T.; Reza, M.T. Evaluation of Fuel and Combustion Properties of Hydrochar Derived from Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass and Plastic. Biomass Bioenergy, 2022; under review. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.; Ge, Y.; Xiao, H.; He, Q.; Wang, W.; Chen, B. Investigation of Hydrothermal Co-Carbonization of Waste Textile with Waste Wood, Waste Paper and Waste Food from Typical Municipal Solid Wastes. Energy 2020, 210, 118606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naderi, M.; Vesali-Naseh, M. Hydrochar-Derived Fuels from Waste Walnut Shell through Hydrothermal Carbonization: Characterization and Effect of Processing Parameters. Biomass Convers. Bioref. 2021, 11, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garrido, R.A.; Lagos, C.; Luna, C.; Sánchez, J.; Díaz, G. Study of the Potential Uses of Hydrochar from Grape Pomace and Walnut Shells Generated from Hydrothermal Carbonization as an Alternative for the Revalorization of Agri-Waste in Chile. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariuzza, D.; Lin, J.-C.; Volpe, M.; Fiori, L.; Ceylan, S.; Goldfarb, J.L. Impact of Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Animal and Agricultural Waste on Hydrochars’ Soil Amendment and Solid Fuel Properties. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 157, 106329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Wang, F.; Shen, X.; Yi, W.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Tian, C. Comparison Study on Fuel Properties of Hydrochars Produced from Corn Stalk and Corn Stalk Digestate. Energy 2018, 165, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lang, Q.; Guo, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Liu, Z.; Gai, C. Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Lignocellulosic Biomass and Swine Manure: Hydrochar Properties and Heavy Metal Transformation Behavior. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 266, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, D.; Zhao, W.; Mäkelä, M.; Alwahabi, Z.T.; Kwong, C.W. Effect of Hydrothermal Carbonisation Temperature on the Ignition Properties of Grape Marc Hydrochar Fuels. Fuel 2021, 313, 122668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basso, D.; Weiss-Hortala, E.; Patuzzi, F.; Baratieri, M.; Fiori, L. In Deep Analysis on the Behavior of Grape Marc Constituents during Hydrothermal Carbonization. Energies 2018, 11, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Y.; Bai, L.; Chi, M.; Xu, X.; Chen, Z.; Yu, K.; Liu, Z. Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Pretreatment Lignocellulose Biomass and Polyvinyl Chloride for Clean Solid Fuel Production: Hydrochar Properties and Its Formation Mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 106975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; Li, B.; Chen, C.; Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, K. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Tobacco Stalk for Fuel Application. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 220, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sharma, H.B.; Panigrahi, S.; Dubey, B.K. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Yard Waste for Solid Bio-Fuel Production: Study on Combustion Kinetic, Energy Properties, Grindability and Flowability of Hydrochar. Waste Manag. 2019, 91, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Ma, X.; Peng, X.; Lin, Y.; Yao, Z. Conversion of Sweet Potato Waste to Solid Fuel via Hydrothermal Carbonization. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Areeprasert, C.; Zhao, P.; Ma, D.; Shen, Y.; Yoshikawa, K. Alternative Solid Fuel Production from Paper Sludge Employing Hydrothermal Treatment. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 1198–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maniscalco, M.P.; Volpe, M.; Messineo, A. Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Valuable Tool for Energy and Environmental Applications: A Review. Energies 2020, 13, 4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.N.; Huang, F.-C.; Lee, C.-K.; Chao, H.-P. Activated Carbon Derived from Spherical Hydrochar Functionalized with Triethylenetetramine: Synthesis, Characterizations, and Adsorption Application. Green Process. Synth. 2017, 6, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, N.; Volpe, M.; Fiori, L.; Volpe, R.; Messineo, A.; Reza, M.T. Cationic Dye Adsorption on Hydrochars of Winery and Citrus Juice Industries Residues: Performance, Mechanism, and Thermodynamics. Energies 2020, 13, 4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrentino, R.; Ceccato, R.; Marchetti, V.; Andreottola, G.; Fiori, L. Sewage Sludge Hydrochar: An Option for Removal of Methylene Blue from Wastewater. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azzaz, A.A.; Khiari, B.; Jellali, S.; Ghimbeu, C.M.; Jeguirim, M. Hydrochars Production, Characterization and Application for Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 127, 109882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, F.; Li, K.; Hang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, P.; Wei, L.; Xie, C. Efficient Removal of Methylene Blue by Activated Hydrochar Prepared by Hydrothermal Carbonization and NaOH Activation of Sugarcane Bagasse and Phosphoric Acid. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 1885–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Q.; Liu, T.; Li, L.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Wang, B.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Gao, B. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Distillers Grains with Clay Minerals for Enhanced Adsorption of Phosphate and Methylene Blue. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.H.; Le, H.H.; Pham, T.H.; Nguyen, D.T.; La, D.D.; Chang, S.W.; Lee, S.M.; Chung, W.J.; Nguyen, D.D. Comparative Study on Methylene Blue Adsorption Behavior of Coffee Husk-Derived Activated Carbon Materials Prepared Using Hydrothermal and Soaking Methods. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.N.; You, S.-J.; Chao, H.-P. Fast and Efficient Adsorption of Methylene Green 5 on Activated Carbon Prepared from New Chemical Activation Method. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 188, 322–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tabassum, M.; Bardhan, M.; Novera, T.M.; Islam, M.A.; Hadi Jawad, A.; Islam, M.A. NaOH-Activated Betel Nut Husk Hydrochar for Efficient Adsorption of Methylene Blue Dye. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, W.-C.; Luo, X.-P.; Wang, X.; Guo, M.; Li, B. Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution by Modified Bamboo Hydrochar. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 157, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Yan, Z.; Cheng, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, A.; Chen, L. Quaternary Ammonium-Functionalized Rice Straw Hydrochar as Efficient Adsorbents for Methyl Orange Removal from Aqueous Solution. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madduri, S.; Elsayed, I.; Hassan, E.B. Novel Oxone Treated Hydrochar for the Removal of Pb(II) and Methylene Blue (MB) Dye from Aqueous Solutions. Chemosphere 2020, 260, 127683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, B.-W.; Xu, H.; Guo, J.-Z.; Bai, L.-Q.; Li, B. Efficient Adsorption of Methylene Blue on Carboxylate-Rich Hydrochar Prepared by One-Step Hydrothermal Carbonization of Bamboo and Acrylic Acid with Ammonium Persulphate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 421, 126741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Huang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Cai, J. Hierarchical Porous Carbons from Biowaste: Hydrothermal Carbonization and High-Performance for Rhodamine B Adsorptive Removal. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 330, 115580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.-Z.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Guo, J.-Z.; Lv, J.-Q.; Huan, W.-W.; Li, B. Preparation of Hydrochar with High Adsorption Performance for Methylene Blue by Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Polyvinyl Chloride and Bamboo. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, F.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Hu, X.; Yu, Z.; Huang, J.; Gao, B. One-Pot Synthesis and Characterization of Engineered Hydrochar by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass with ZnCl2. Chemosphere 2020, 254, 126866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Wang, Q.; Guo, J.-Z.; Huan, W.-W.; Liu, L. Sorption of Methyl Orange from Aqueous Solution by Protonated Amine Modified Hydrochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 268, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Lv, J.-Q.; Guo, J.-Z.; Fu, S.-Y.; Guo, M.; Yang, P. The Polyaminocarboxylated Modified Hydrochar for Efficient Capturing Methylene Blue and Cu(II) from Water. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 275, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, B.; Guo, J.; Lv, K.; Fan, J. Adsorption of Methylene Blue and Cd(II) onto Maleylated Modified Hydrochar from Water. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna Murthy, T.P.; Gowrishankar, B.S.; Krishna, R.H.; Chandraprabha, M.N.; Mathew, B.B. Magnetic Modification of Coffee Husk Hydrochar for Adsorptive Removal of Methylene Blue: Isotherms, Kinetics and Thermodynamic Studies. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2020, 2, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Y.; Huang, G.; Li, J.; Yang, Q.; Huang, S.; Cai, J. Hydrothermal Conversion of Bamboo Shoot Shell to Biochar: Preliminary Studies of Adsorption Equilibrium and Kinetics for Rhodamine B Removal. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2019, 143, 104694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Lin, H.; Dai, L.; Qiu, R.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Duan, P.-G.; Ok, Y.S. Waste Shrimp Shell-Derived Hydrochar as an Emergent Material for Methyl Orange Removal in Aqueous Solutions. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duy Nguyen, H.; Nguyen Tran, H.; Chao, H.-P.; Lin, C.-C. Activated Carbons Derived from Teak Sawdust-Hydrochars for Efficient Removal of Methylene Blue, Copper, and Cadmium from Aqueous Solution. Water 2019, 11, 2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alshareef, S.A.; Otero, M.; Alanazi, H.S.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Khan, M.A.; Alothman, Z.A. Upcycling Olive Oil Cake through Wet Torrefaction to Produce Hydrochar for Water Decontamination. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2021, 170, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO. Exposure to Lead: A Major Public Health Concern, 2nd ed.; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240037656 (accessed on 23 September 2022).
- Dhaouadi, F.; Sellaoui, L.; Hernández-Hernández, L.E.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Mendoza-Castillo, D.I.; Reynel-Ávila, H.E.; González-Ponce, H.A.; Taamalli, S.; Louis, F.; Lamine, A.B. Preparation of an Avocado Seed Hydrochar and Its Application as Heavy Metal Adsorbent: Properties and Advanced Statistical Physics Modeling. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 129472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Tsend, N.; Li, T.; Liu, H.; Yang, R.; Gai, X.; Wang, H.; Shan, S. Microwave Assisted Hydrothermal Preparation of Rice Straw Hydrochars for Adsorption of Organics and Heavy Metals. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 273, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, Y.; Gao, B.; Yao, Y.; Inyang, M.; Zhang, M.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Ro, K.S. Hydrogen Peroxide Modification Enhances the Ability of Biochar (Hydrochar) Produced from Hydrothermal Carbonization of Peanut Hull to Remove Aqueous Heavy Metals: Batch and Column Tests. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 200–202, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Zhang, T.; Xue, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Bolan, N.S.; Jiang, R.; Tsang, D.C.W. Enhanced Adsorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from Aqueous Solution by Polyethyleneimine Modified Straw Hydrochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 778, 146116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghanim, B.; Leahy, J.J.; OʼDwyer, T.F.; Kwapinski, W.; Pembroke, J.T.; Murnane, J.G. Removal of Hexavalent Chromium (Cr(VI)) from Aqueous Solution Using Acid-modified Poultry Litter-derived Hydrochar: Adsorption, Regeneration and Reuse. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 97, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Huang, Z.; Lin, J.; Li, X.; Qiu, J.; Liu, J.; Mao, X. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge and In-Situ Preparation of Hydrochar/MgAl-Layered Double Hydroxides Composites for Adsorption of Pb(II). J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadarajah, K.; Bandala, E.R.; Zhang, Z.; Mundree, S.; Goonetilleke, A. Removal of Heavy Metals from Water Using Engineered Hydrochar: Kinetics and Mechanistic Approach. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Q.; Xie, W.; Han, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced Adsorption of Pb(II) onto Modified Hydrochar by Polyethyleneimine or H3PO4: An Analysis of Surface Property and Interface Mechanism. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 583, 123962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khushk, S.; Zhang, L.; Pirzada, A.M.; Irfan, M.; Li, A. Cr(VI) Heavy Metal Adsorption from Aqueous Solution by KOH Treated Hydrochar Derived from Agricultural Wastes; AIP Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, Y.; Yang, T.; Zhu, N.; Li, D.; Chen, Z.; Lang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Jiao, W. Enhanced Adsorption of Pb(II) onto Modified Hydrochar: Modeling and Mechanism Analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 288, 121593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, L.S.; Pereira, D.; Sousa, É.; Otero, M.; Esteves, V.I.; Calisto, V. Recent Advances on the Development and Application of Magnetic Activated Carbon and Char for the Removal of Pharmaceutical Compounds from Waters: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 718, 137272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zenker, A.; Cicero, M.R.; Prestinaci, F.; Bottoni, P.; Carere, M. Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification Potential of Pharmaceuticals with a Focus to the Aquatic Environment. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 133, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kimbi Yaah, V.B.; Zbair, M.; Botelho de Oliveira, S.; Ojala, S. Hydrochar-Derived Adsorbent for the Removal of Diclofenac from Aqueous Solution. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2021, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mestre, A.S.; Tyszko, E.; Andrade, M.A.; Galhetas, M.; Freire, C.; Carvalho, A.P. Sustainable Activated Carbons Prepared from a Sucrose-Derived Hydrochar: Remarkable Adsorbents for Pharmaceutical Compounds. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 19696–19707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larous, S.; Meniai, A.-H. Adsorption of Diclofenac from Aqueous Solution Using Activated Carbon Prepared from Olive Stones. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 10380–10390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado-Moreno, L.; Bazhari, S.; Gasco, G.; Méndez, A.; El Azzouzi, M.; Romero, E. New Insights into the Efficient Removal of Emerging Contaminants by Biochars and Hydrochars Derived from Olive Oil Wastes. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 752, 141838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, T.; Memon, N.; Memon, S.Q.; Yavuz, H.; Lachgar, A.; Denizli, A. Evaluation of Hydrochar Efficiency for Simultaneous Removal of Diclofenac and Ibuprofen from Aqueous System Using Surface Response Methodology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 9796–9804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pauletto, P.S.; Moreno-Pérez, J.; Hernández-Hernández, L.E.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Dotto, G.L.; Salau, N.P.G. Novel Biochar and Hydrochar for the Adsorption of 2-Nitrophenol from Aqueous Solutions: An Approach Using the PVSDM Model. Chemosphere 2021, 269, 128748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sachan, D.; Das, G. Selective Adsorption of Drug Micropollutants from Synthetic Wastewater Using Hydrochar Derived from Carbonisation of Unused Leaves. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wan, Z.; Jing, F.; Li, Z.; Chen, J.; Tsang, D.C.W. Tailored Design of Food Waste Hydrochar for Efficient Adsorption and Catalytic Degradation of Refractory Organic Contaminant. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 310, 127482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weidemann, E.; Niinipuu, M.; Fick, J.; Jansson, S. Using Carbonized Low-Cost Materials for Removal of Chemicals of Environmental Concern from Water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 15793–15801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Lima, H.H.C.; Llop, M.E.G.; dos Santos Maniezzo, R.; Moisés, M.P.; Janeiro, V.; Arroyo, P.A.; Guilherme, M.R.; Rinaldi, A.W. Enhanced Removal of Bisphenol A Using Pine-Fruit Shell-Derived Hydrochars: Adsorption Mechanisms and Reusability. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 126167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, H.; Niu, Z.; Shi, R.; Tang, J.; Lv, L.; Wang, J.; Fan, Y. Thermal Oxidation Activation of Hydrochar for Tetracycline Adsorption: The Role of Oxygen Concentration and Temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Araújo, T.P.; Quesada, H.B.; Bergamasco, R.; Vareschini, D.T.; de Barros, M.A.S.D. Activated Hydrochar Produced from Brewer’s Spent Grain and Its Application in the Removal of Acetaminophen. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 310, 123399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hagos, F.M.; Qian, H.; Di, J.; Shan, S.; Yang, R.; Li, Y.; Gai, X. Rice Husk Hydrochars Prepared with Different Post-Treatment Methods for the Adsorption of Dyes and Antibiotics. BioResources 2021, 17, 725–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghababaei, A.; Azargohar, R.; Dalai, A.K.; Soltan, J.; Niu, C.H. Effective Adsorption of Carbamazepine from Water by Adsorbents Developed from Flax Shives and Oat Hulls: Key Factors and Characterization. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, M.E.; Ledesma, B.; Román, S.; Bonelli, P.R.; Cukierman, A.L. Development and Characterization of Activated Hydrochars from Orange Peels as Potential Adsorbents for Emerging Organic Contaminants. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 183, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oumabady, S.; Selvaraj, P.S.; Periasamy, K.; Veeraswamy, D.; Ramesh, P.T.; Palanisami, T.; Ramasamy, S.P. Kinetic and Isotherm Insights of Diclofenac Removal by Sludge Derived Hydrochar. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A.B. Sustainable Porous Carbons with a Superior Performance for CO2 Capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1765–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sevilla, M.; Maciá-Agulló, J.A.; Fuertes, A.B. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass as a Route for the Sequestration of CO2: Chemical and Structural Properties of the Carbonized Products. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 3152–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goel, C.; Mohan, S.; Dinesha, P. CO2 Capture by Adsorption on Biomass-Derived Activated Char: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matabosch Coromina, H.; Walsh, D.A.; Mokaya, R. Biomass-Derived Activated Carbon with Simultaneously Enhanced CO2 Uptake for Both Pre and Post Combustion Capture Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.-P.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.-C. Sustainable Microalgae for the Simultaneous Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots for Cellular Imaging and Porous Carbon for CO2 Capture. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 493, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, X.; Zhang, C.; Tian, Z.; Cai, J. Large-Surface-Area Carbons Derived from Lotus Stem Waste for Efficient CO2 Capture. New Carbon Mater. 2018, 33, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Sun, C.; Liu, H.; Tan, W.H.; Wang, W.; Snape, C. Developing Hierarchically Ultra-Micro/Mesoporous Biocarbons for Highly Selective Carbon Dioxide Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.-H.; Chung, K.; Bang, G.; Kim, K.-M.; Lee, C.-H. Adsorption Equilibria and Kinetics of CO2, CH4, CO, N2, and H2 on KOH-Treated Activated Carbon Pellets up to 1000 KPa. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Lin, Q.; Fu, C.; Wang, M.; Han, M.; Huang, C.; Pan, H.; Liu, F. Alkaline KMnO4 Solution Pretreat Hydrochar to Prepare High Ultra-Micropore Volume Carbon for CH4 Enrichment from Low-Concentration Coalbed Methane. Fuel 2021, 303, 121301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sevilla, M.; Sangchoom, W.; Balahmar, N.; Fuertes, A.B.; Mokaya, R. Highly Porous Renewable Carbons for Enhanced Storage of Energy-Related Gases (H2 and CO2) at High Pressures. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 4710–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, G.; Wu, X.; Hou, Y.; Cai, J. Sustainable Porous Carbons from Garlic Peel Biowaste and KOH Activation with an Excellent CO2 Adsorption Performance. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2020, 10, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, F.; Li, D.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Fu, L.; Guo, Z.; Liang, M.; Wang, B.; Luo, D.; Li, B. Rational Introduction of Nitridizing Agent to Hydrothermal Carbonization for Enhancing CO2 Capture Performance of Tobacco Stalk-Based Porous Carbons. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 157, 105047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, L.; Ma, R.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Wu, Z.; Yang, J.; Hu, X. Nitrogen Enriched Porous Carbons from D-Glucose with Excellent CO2 Capture Performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 362, 794–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rouzitalab, Z.; Maklavany, D.M.; Jafarinejad, S.; Rashidi, A. Lignocellulose-Based Adsorbents: A Spotlight Review of the Effective Parameters on Carbon Dioxide Capture Process. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Yue, L.; Hu, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, Y.; Sun, Y.; DaCosta, H.; Guo, L. Efficient CO2 Capture by Porous Carbons Derived from Coconut Shell. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 4287–4293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serafin, J.; Narkiewicz, U.; Morawski, A.W.; Wróbel, R.J.; Michalkiewicz, B. Highly Microporous Activated Carbons from Biomass for CO2 Capture and Effective Micropores at Different Conditions. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 18, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J.-S.; Su, S. Macadamia Nut Shell-Derived Carbon Composites for Post Combustion CO2 Capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2013, 19, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashidi, A.M.; Kazemi, D.; Izadi, N.; Pourkhalil, M.; Jorsaraei, A.; Ganji, E.; Lotfi, R. Preparation of Nanoporous Activated Carbon and Its Application as Nano Adsorbent for CO2 Storage. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gopalan, J.; Buthiyappan, A.; Abdul Raman, A.A. Insight into Metal-Impregnated Biomass Based Activated Carbon for Enhanced Carbon Dioxide Adsorption: A Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 113, 72–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, T.; Tian, W.; Wang, Y. Effect of Pore Structure on CO2 Adsorption Performance for ZnCl2/FeCl3/H2O(g) Co-Activated Walnut Shell-Based Biochar. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, H.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.; Li, G.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. High CO2 Adsorption on Amine-Functionalized Improved Macro-/Mesoporous Multimodal Pore Silica. Fuel 2022, 315, 123195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.; Ye, J.; Yan, Y.; Tang, Z.; Yu, D.; Yang, J. Preparation and CO2 Adsorption Properties of Porous Carbon from Camphor Leaves by Hydrothermal Carbonization and Sequential Potassium Hydroxide Activation. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 4152–4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarwar, A.; Ali, M.; Khoja, A.H.; Nawar, A.; Waqas, A.; Liaquat, R.; Naqvi, S.R.; Asjid, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Biomass-Derived Surface-Modified Activated Carbon for Enhanced CO2 Adsorption. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 46, 101476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, E.; Cheng, S.; Tu, R.; He, Z.; Jia, Z.; Long, X.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xu, X. High Yield Self-Nitrogen-Oxygen Doped Hydrochar Derived from Microalgae Carbonization in Bio-Oil: Properties and Potential Applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 314, 123735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parshetti, G.K.; Chowdhury, S.; Balasubramanian, R. Biomass Derived Low-Cost Microporous Adsorbents for Efficient CO2 Capture. Fuel 2015, 148, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creamer, A.E.; Gao, B. Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Postcombustion CO2 Capture: A Critical Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 7276–7289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, G.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Cai, J. Activated Carbons Prepared by the KOH Activation of a Hydrochar from Garlic Peel and Their CO2 Adsorption Performance. New Carbon Mater. 2019, 34, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, M.; Cai, W.; Verpoort, F.; Zhou, J. Preparation of Pineapple Waste-Derived Porous Carbons with Enhanced CO2 Capture Performance by Hydrothermal Carbonation-Alkali Metal Oxalates Assisted Thermal Activation Process. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2019, 146, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourebrahimi, S.; Kazemeini, M.; Zaroudi, M.; Bozorgzadeh, H. Methane Adsorption on Carbonaceous Microporous Materials Prepared from Cellulose and Lignin: Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies. Sci. Iran. 2018, 25, 3368–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wedler, C.; Lotz, K.; Arami-Niya, A.; Xiao, G.; Span, R.; Muhler, M.; May, E.F.; Richter, M. Influence of Mineral Composition of Chars Derived by Hydrothermal Carbonization on Sorption Behavior of CO2, CH4, and O2. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10704–10714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mestre, A.S.; Freire, C.; Pires, J.; Carvalho, A.P.; Pinto, M.L. High Performance Microspherical Activated Carbons for Methane Storage and Landfill Gas or Biogas Upgrade. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 15337–15344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, D.; Rao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wu, M. Superior CO2, CH4, and H2 Uptakes over Ultrahigh-Surface-Area Carbon Spheres Prepared from Sustainable Biomass-Derived Char by CO2 Activation. Carbon 2016, 105, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, D.; Guo, N.; Gao, A.; Zheng, L.; Xu, W.; Li, M.; Wang, F.; Yang, R. Preparation of Oxygen-Enriched Hierarchically Porous Carbon by KMnO4 One-Pot Oxidation and Activation: Mechanism and Capacitive Energy Storage. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 294, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.-Y.; Yang, W.; Chu, W. K2S-Activated Carbons Developed from Coal and Their Methane Adsorption Behaviors. Chin. Phys. B 2014, 23, 108201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; Qi, J.; Yang, C.; Zhao, X. Poly(Vinylidene Chloride)-Based Carbon with Ultrahigh Microporosity and Outstanding Performance for CH4 and H2 Storage and CO2 Capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 3703–3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez Correa, C.; Bernardo, M.; Ribeiro, R.P.P.L.; Esteves, I.A.A.C.; Kruse, A. Evaluation of Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Preliminary Step for the Production of Functional Materials from Biogas Digestate. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 124, 461–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Physisorption and Chemisorption—Definition, Mechanism, Differences. Available online: https://byjus.com/jee/physisorption-and-chemisorption/ (accessed on 6 December 2022).
- De Oliveira, L.H.; Meneguin, J.G.; Pereira, M.V.; do Nascimento, J.F.; Arroyo, P.A. Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide, Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Their Mixtures on Activated Carbon. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019, 206, 1533–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Titirici, M.-M.; Antonietti, M. Chemistry and Materials Options of Sustainable Carbon Materials Made by Hydrothermal Carbonization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulkareem-Alsultan, G.; Asikin-Mijan, N.; Lee, H.V.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. A New Route for the Synthesis of La-Ca Oxide Supported on Nano Activated Carbon via Vacuum Impregnation Method for One Pot Esterification-Transesterification Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, S.; Rashid, U.; Yunus, R.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Biodiesel Production in the Presence of Sulfonated Mesoporous ZnAl2O4 Catalyst via Esterification of Palm Fatty Acid Distillate (PFAD). Fuel 2016, 178, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konwar, L.J.; Mäki-Arvela, P.; Mikkola, J.-P. SO3H-Containing Functional Carbon Materials: Synthesis, Structure, and Acid Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 11576–11630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zailan, Z.; Tahir, M.; Jusoh, M.; Zakaria, Z.Y. A Review of Sulfonic Group Bearing Porous Carbon Catalyst for Biodiesel Production. Renew. Energy 2021, 175, 430–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Fang, B. Preparation of Solid Acid Catalyst from Glucose–Starch Mixture for Biodiesel Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2635–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ning, Y.; Niu, S. Preparation and Catalytic Performance in Esterification of a Bamboo-Based Heterogeneous Acid Catalyst with Microwave Assistance. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 153, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lokman, I.M.; Rashid, U.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Meso- and Macroporous Sulfonated Starch Solid Acid Catalyst for Esterification of Palm Fatty Acid Distillate. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Okamura, M.; Takagaki, A.; Toda, M.; Kondo, J.N.; Domen, K.; Tatsumi, T.; Hara, M.; Hayashi, S. Acid-Catalyzed Reactions on Flexible Polycyclic Aromatic Carbon in Amorphous Carbon. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 3039–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamborini, L.H.; Casco, M.E.; Militello, M.P.; Silvestre-Albero, J.; Barbero, C.A.; Acevedo, D.F. Sulfonated Porous Carbon Catalysts for Biodiesel Production: Clear Effect of the Carbon Particle Size on the Catalyst Synthesis and Properties. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 149, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz de Tuesta, J.L.; Saviotti, M.C.; Roman, F.F.; Pantuzza, G.F.; Sartori, H.J.F.; Shinibekova, A.; Kalmakhanova, M.S.; Massalimova, B.K.; Pietrobelli, J.M.T.A.; Lenzi, G.G.; et al. Assisted Hydrothermal Carbonization of Agroindustrial Byproducts as Effective Step in the Production of Activated Carbon Catalysts for Wet Peroxide Oxidation of Micro-Pollutants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Zhang, F.-S.; Wu, J. Characterization and Application of Chars Produced from Pinewood Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Treatment. Fuel 2010, 89, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Román-Martínez, M.C.; Cazorla-Amorós, D.; Linares-Solano, A.; De Lecea, C.S.-M.; Yamashita, H.; Anpo, M. Metal-Support Interaction in Pt/C Catalysts. Influence of the Support Surface Chemistry and the Metal Precursor. Carbon 1995, 33, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, X.; Ge, M.; Chen, X.; Qian, C.; Liu, X.; Zhou, S. Facile Synthesis of Hydrochar Supported Copper Nanocatalyst for Ullmann CN Coupling Reaction in Water. Mol. Catal. 2020, 484, 110726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Xu, J.; Lin, H.; Zhao, X.; Shang, J.; Liu, Z. Arsenic Removal via a Novel Hydrochar from Livestock Waste Co-Activated with Thiourea and γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q.; Cui, L.; Zhou, S.; Li, Y.; Shi, W.; Ai, S. Iron Nanoparticles in Situ Encapsulated in Lignin-Derived Hydrochar as an Effective Catalyst for Phenol Removal. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 20833–20840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, Y.; Zhang, T.; Sharma, B.K.; Nie, H. Optimization and Mechanism Studies on Cell Disruption and Phosphorus Recovery from Microalgae with Magnesium Modified Hydrochar in Assisted Hydrothermal System. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 1140–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dang, M.; Chen, D.; Lu, P.; Xu, G. Enhanced Degradation of DDT Using a Novel Iron-Assisted Hydrochar Catalyst Combined with Peroxymonosulfate: Experiment and Mechanism Analysis. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, J.; Liang, Y.; Qin, L.; Zhao, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y. Ni@HC Core–Shell Structured Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane and Carbon Dioxide. Catal. Lett. 2019, 149, 3224–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, C.; Dai, L. Doping of Carbon Materials for Metal-free Electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.B.; Miao, J.; Hung, S.-F.; Chen, J.; Tao, H.B.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, R.; Gao, J.; Chen, H.M. Identification of Catalytic Sites for Oxygen Reduction and Oxygen Evolution in N-Doped Graphene Materials: Development of Highly Efficient Metal-Free Bifunctional Electrocatalyst. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, X.; Long, Y.; Fan, M.; Yuan, M.; Zhao, H.; Ma, J.; Dong, Z. Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks as Self-Template Derived Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanosheets for Eco-Friendly Metal-Free Catalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 244, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, X.; Ao, Z.; Sun, H.; Indrawirawan, S.; Wang, Y.; Kang, J.; Liang, F.; Zhu, Z.H.; Wang, S. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for Generation and Evolution of Reactive Radicals by Metal-Free Catalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4169–4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Carroll, K.C. Metal-Free Catalysis of Persulfate Activation and Organic-Pollutant Degradation by Nitrogen-Doped Graphene and Aminated Graphene. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 215, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Shen, X.; Qiu, Y.; Yin, D.; Wang, S. Persistent Free Radicals on N-Doped Hydrochar for Degradation of Endocrine Disrupting Compounds. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, M.; Meysami, S.S.; Ferrero, G.A.; Xie, F.; Meng, H.; Grobert, N.; Titirici, M.-M. Low-Cost Chitosan-Derived N-Doped Carbons Boost Electrocatalytic Activity of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1707284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Ma, Q.; Chen, L.; Yang, Z.; Aqeel Kamran, M.; Chen, B. Hydrochar-Mediated Photocatalyst Fe3O4/BiOBr@HC for Highly Efficient Carbamazepine Degradation under Visible LED Light Irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 134492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Mao, L.; Chen, B. Driving Forces Linking Microbial Community Structure and Functions to Enhanced Carbon Stability in Biochar-Amended Soil. Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandouqa, A.; Al-Hamamre, Z.; Asfar, J. Preparation and Performance Investigation of a Lignin-Based Solid Acid Catalyst Manufactured from Olive Cake for Biodiesel Production. Renew. Energy 2019, 132, 667–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zeng, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Flower-like Carbon Spheres Solid Acid from Glucose for Esterification. Mater. Lett. 2017, 193, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimin, K.; Chang, J.; Juan, F.A.N. One Step Preparation of Sulfonated Solid Catalyst and Its Effect in Esterification Reaction. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 22, 392–397. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, L.; Mao, H.; Lei, C.; Wang, Q.; Gao, Z. The SO3H-Functionalized Carbonaceous@montmorillonite Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for Synthesis of Trimethylolpropane from Long-Chain Fatty Acid. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 289, 109623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araujo, R.O.; Santos, V.O.; Ribeiro, F.C.P.; Chaar, J. da S.; Falcão, N.P.S.; de Souza, L.K.C. One-Step Synthesis of a Heterogeneous Catalyst by the Hydrothermal Carbonization of Acai Seed. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 2021, 134, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, S.F.; Asikin-Mijan, N.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Abdulkareem-Alsultan, G.; Izham, S.M.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Sulfonated Functionalization of Carbon Derived Corncob Residue via Hydrothermal Synthesis Route for Esterification of Palm Fatty Acid Distillate. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 210, 112698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Sheng, K.; Liang, Y.; Liu, J.; E, S.; Zhang, X. Green Synthesis of Aluminum-Hydrochar for the Selective Isomerization of Glucose to Fructose. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 727, 138743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Ai, X.; Huang, B.; Huang, M.; Huang, Y.; Lu, Y. Consecutive Preparation of Hydrochar Catalyst Functionalized in Situ with Sulfonic Groups for Efficient Cellulose Hydrolysis. Cellulose 2017, 24, 2743–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Zhang, H.; Ao, Z.; Zhang, S. Hydrothermal Carbon Enriched with Sulfonic and Carboxyl Groups as an Efficient Solid Acid Catalyst for Butanolysis of Furfuryl Alcohol. Catal. Commun. 2019, 123, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.-L.; Li, J.-L.; Zhao, L.; Sui, X.-L.; Zhou, Q.-Y.; Gong, X.-F.; Cai, J.-J.; Li, J.-Z.; Gu, D.-M.; Wang, Z.-B. Nitrogen Doped Carbon Coated Mo Modified TiO2 Nanowires (NC@MTNWs-FI) with Functionalized Interfacial as Advanced PtRu Catalyst Support for Methanol Electrooxidation. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 331, 135410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pirsaheb, M.; Moradi, S.; Shahlaei, M.; Farhadian, N. Application of Carbon Dots as Efficient Catalyst for the Green Oxidation of Phenol: Kinetic Study of the Degradation and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 353, 444–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gai, C.; Zhang, F.; Yang, T.; Liu, Z.; Jiao, W.; Peng, N.; Liu, T.; Lang, Q.; Xia, Y. Hydrochar Supported Bimetallic Ni–Fe Nanocatalysts with Tailored Composition, Size and Shape for Improved Biomass Steam Reforming Performance. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 2788–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Liu, Z. Comparison of Hydrochar- and Pyrochar-Based Solid Acid Catalysts from Cornstalk: Physiochemical Properties, Catalytic Activity and Deactivation Behavior. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yabalak, E.; Elneccar, F. Evaluation of Watermelon Peel, Banana Peel and Bay Leaves Hydrochars as Green Catalysts in the Degradation of Malachite Green by Thermally Activated Persulfate Oxidation Method. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 304, 114311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, X.; Liu, J.; Ma, L. Facile Synthesis of Hydrochar-Supported Catalysts from Glucose and Its Catalytic Activity towards the Production of Functional Amines. Green Energy Environ. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Q.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Yin, H. Synthesis of Modified Char-Supported Ni–Fe Catalyst with Hierarchical Structure for Catalytic Cracking of Biomass Tar. Renew. Energy 2021, 174, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ababneh, H.; Hameed, B.H. Chitosan-Derived Hydrothermally Carbonized Materials and Its Applications: A Review of Recent Literature. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 186, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winter, M.; Brodd, R.J. What Are Batteries, Fuel Cells, and Supercapacitors? Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4245–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Masoumi, S.; Borugadda, V.B.; Nanda, S.; Dalai, A.K. Hydrochar: A Review on Its Production Technologies and Applications. Catalysts 2021, 11, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Shi, F.; An, Q.; Zhai, S.; Wang, K.; Tong, Y. Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Porous Carbon Derived from Lignin for Supercapacitors: Insight into the Hydrothermal Carbonization and Activation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 166, 923–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; Cao, J.-P.; Zhao, X.-Y.; Zhuang, Q.-Q.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y.; Wei, X.-Y. High-Performance Electrode Material for Electric Double-Layer Capacitor Based on Hydrothermal Pre-Treatment of Lignin by ZnCl2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 144536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Y.; Liu, P.-F.; Huang, Z.-Y.; Jiang, T.-W.; Yao, K.-L.; Han, R. Porous Hollow Carbon Spheres for Electrode Material of Supercapacitors and Support Material of Dendritic Pt Electrocatalyst. J. Power Sources 2015, 280, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Luo, J.; Wei, M.; Yao, X.; Feng, Q.; Ma, X.; Liu, Z. Functional Porous Carbon Derived from Waste Eucalyptus Bark for Toluene Adsorption and Aqueous Symmetric Supercapacitors. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 127, 109196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, H.; Yan, C.; Chu, X.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, X.; et al. Highly Microporous Carbon with Nitrogen-Doping Derived from Natural Biowaste for High-Performance Flexible Solid-State Supercapacitor. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 548, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, C. Incorporation of MnO2 into Egg Yolk Derived P, N, O-Tridoped Carbon for Supercapacitors with Excellent Cycling Stability. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2019, 8284–8295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, K.; Lin, H.; Qian, X.; Sheng, K. Green Synthesis of Fe-Decorated Carbon Sphere/Nanosheet Derived from Bamboo for High-Performance Supercapacitor Application. Energy Fuels 2020, 35, 827–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arenas Esteban, D.; Guerrero Martínez, A.; Carretero González, J.; Birss, V.I.; Otero-Díaz, L.C.; Ávila Brande, D. Tunable Supercapacitor Materials Derived from Hydrochar/Gold Nanograpes. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 9348–9359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agegnehu, G.; Srivastava, A.K.; Bird, M.I. The Role of Biochar and Biochar-Compost in Improving Soil Quality and Crop Performance: A Review. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busch, D.; Glaser, B. Stability of Co-Composted Hydrochar and Biochar under Field Conditions in a Temperate Soil. Soil Use Manag. 2015, 31, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, J.; Zhan, L.; Ok, Y.S.; Gao, B. Minireview of Potential Applications of Hydrochar Derived from Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 57, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornes, F.; Belda, R.M.; Lidón, A. Analysis of Two Biochars and One Hydrochar from Different Feedstock: Focus Set on Environmental, Nutritional and Horticultural Considerations. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 86, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paneque, M.; Knicker, H.; Kern, J.; Rosa, J.M.D. la Hydrothermal Carbonization and Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge: Effects on Lolium Perenne Germination and Growth. Agronomy 2019, 9, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schimmelpfennig, S.; Kammann, C.; Moser, G.; Grünhage, L.; Müller, C. Changes in Macro- and Micronutrient Contents of Grasses and Forbs Following Miscanthus × giganteus feedstock, Hydrochar and Biochar Application to Temperate Grassland. Grass Forage Sci. 2015, 70, 582–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheifele, M.; Hobi, A.; Buegger, F.; Gattinger, A.; Schulin, R.; Boller, T.; Mäder, P. Impact of Pyrochar and Hydrochar on Soybean (Glycine max L.) Root Nodulation and Biological Nitrogen Fixation. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2017, 180, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, A.; Kaupenjohann, M. Suitability of Biochars (Pyro- and Hydrochars) for Metal Immobilization on Former Sewage-Field Soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2013, 65, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bargmann, I.; Rillig, M.C.; Kruse, A.; Greef, J.-M.; Kücke, M. Effects of Hydrochar Application on the Dynamics of Soluble Nitrogen in Soils and on Plant Availability. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2013, 177, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bento, L.R.; Melo, C.A.; Ferreira, O.P.; Moreira, A.B.; Mounier, S.; Piccolo, A.; Spaccini, R.; Bisinoti, M.C. Humic Extracts of Hydrochar and Amazonian Dark Earth: Molecular Characteristics and Effects on Maize Seed Germination. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 135000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abel, S.; Peters, A.; Trinks, S.; Schonsky, H.; Facklam, M.; Wessolek, G. Impact of Biochar and Hydrochar Addition on Water Retention and Water Repellency of Sandy Soil. Geoderma 2013, 202–203, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mau, V.; Arye, G.; Gross, A. Poultry Litter Hydrochar as an Amendment for Sandy Soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 110959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalderis, D.; Papameletiou, G.; Kayan, B. Assessment of Orange Peel Hydrochar as a Soil Amendment: Impact on Clay Soil Physical Properties and Potential Phytotoxicity. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 10, 3471–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Giannis, A.; Wang, J.-Y. Conversion of Sewage Sludge to Clean Solid Fuel Using Hydrothermal Carbonization: Hydrochar Fuel Characteristics and Combustion Behavior. Appl. Energy 2013, 111, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Q.; Chen, B.; Lin, Y.; Guan, Y. Aromatic and Hydrophobic Surfaces of Wood-Derived Biochar Enhance Perchlorate Adsorption via Hydrogen Bonding to Oxygen-Containing Organic Groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neina, D. The Role of Soil PH in Plant Nutrition and Soil Remediation. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2019, 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Libra, J.A.; Ro, K.S.; Kammann, C.; Funke, A.; Berge, N.D.; Neubauer, Y.; Titirici, M.-M.; Fühner, C.; Bens, O.; Kern, J.; et al. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass Residuals: A Comparative Review of the Chemistry, Processes and Applications of Wet and Dry Pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011, 2, 71–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saha, N.; Saba, A.; Reza, M.T. Effect of Hydrothermal Carbonization Temperature on PH, Dissociation Constants, and Acidic Functional Groups on Hydrochar from Cellulose and Wood. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2019, 137, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, J.; Wang, F.; Zhai, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Peng, C.; Wang, T.; Li, C.; Zeng, G. Effect of Sewage Sludge Hydrochar on Soil Properties and Cd Immobilization in a Contaminated Soil. Chemosphere 2017, 189, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belda, R.M.; Lidón, A.; Fornes, F. Biochars and Hydrochars as Substrate Constituents for Soilless Growth of Myrtle and Mastic. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Röhrdanz, M.; Rebling, T.; Ohlert, J.; Jasper, J.; Greve, T.; Buchwald, R.; von Frieling, P.; Wark, M. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass from Landscape Management – Influence of Process Parameters on Soil Properties of Hydrochars. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 173, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rillig, M.C.; Wagner, M.; Salem, M.; Antunes, P.M.; George, C.; Ramke, H.-G.; Titirici, M.-M.; Antonietti, M. Material Derived from Hydrothermal Carbonization: Effects on Plant Growth and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 45, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez, M.L.; Gascó, G.; Plaza, C.; Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Méndez, A. Hydrochars from Biosolids and Urban Wastes as Substitute Materials for Peat. Land Degrad. Dev. 2017, 28, 2268–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andert, J.; Mumme, J. Impact of Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Biochar on Gas-Emitting Activity of Soil Microorganisms and Bacterial and Archaeal Community Composition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 96, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eskandari, S.; Mohammadi, A.; Sandberg, M.; Eckstein, R.L.; Hedberg, K.; Granström, K. Hydrochar-Amended Substrates for Production of Containerized Pine Tree Seedlings under Different Fertilization Regimes. Agronomy 2019, 9, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- George, C.; Wagner, M.; Kücke, M.; Rillig, M.C. Divergent Consequences of Hydrochar in the Plant–Soil System: Arbuscular Mycorrhiza, Nodulation, Plant Growth and Soil Aggregation Effects. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2012, 59, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuertes, A.B.; Arbestain, M.C.; Sevilla, M.; Maciá-Agulló, J.A.; Fiol, S.; López, R.; Smernik, R.J.; Aitkenhead, W.P.; Arce, F.; Macías, F. Chemical and Structural Properties of Carbonaceous Products Obtained by Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Carbonisation of Corn Stover. Soil Res. 2010, 48, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, B.; Wang, K.; Wu, L.; Yu, S.-H.; Antonietti, M.; Titirici, M.-M. Engineering Carbon Materials from the Hydrothermal Carbonization Process of Biomass. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 813–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eibisch, N.; Helfrich, M.; Don, A.; Mikutta, R.; Kruse, A.; Ellerbrock, R.; Flessa, H. Properties and Degradability of Hydrothermal Carbonization Products. J. Environ. Qual. 2013, 42, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulze, M.; Mumme, J.; Funke, A.; Kern, J. Effects of Selected Process Conditions on the Stability of Hydrochar in Low-Carbon Sandy Soil. Geoderma 2016, 267, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- George, E.; Ventura, M.; Panzacchi, P.; Scandellari, F.; Tonon, G. Can Hydrochar and Pyrochar Affect Nitrogen Uptake and Biomass Allocation in Poplars? J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2017, 180, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baronti, S.; Alberti, G.; Camin, F.; Criscuoli, I.; Genesio, L.; Mass, R.; Vaccari, F.P.; Ziller, L.; Miglietta, F. Hydrochar Enhances Growth of Poplar for Bioenergy While Marginally Contributing to Direct Soil Carbon Sequestration. GCB Bioenergy 2017, 9, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kammann, C.; Ratering, S.; Eckhard, C.; Müller, C. Biochar and Hydrochar Effects on Greenhouse Gas (Carbon Dioxide, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane) Fluxes from Soils. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 1052–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, P.; Feng, Y.; Wang, N.; Petropoulos, E.; Li, D.; Yu, S.; Xue, L.; Yang, L. Win-Win: Application of Sawdust-Derived Hydrochar in Low Fertility Soil Improves Rice Yield and Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 142457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, S.; Feng, Y.; Xue, L.; Sun, H.; Han, L.; Yang, L.; Sun, Q.; Chu, Q. Biowaste to Treasure: Application of Microbial-Aged Hydrochar in Rice Paddy Could Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Rice Grain Free Amino Acids. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adjuik, T.; Rodjom, A.M.; Miller, K.E.; Reza, M.T.M.; Davis, S.C. Application of Hydrochar, Digestate, and Synthetic Fertilizer to a Miscanthus × Giganteus Crop: Implications for Biomass and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naisse, C.; Girardin, C.; Lefevre, R.; Pozzi, A.; Maas, R.; Stark, A.; Rumpel, C. Effect of Physical Weathering on the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Biochars and Hydrochars in Soil. GCB Bioenergy 2014, 7, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schimmelpfennig, S.; Müller, C.; Grünhage, L.; Koch, C.; Kammann, C. Biochar, Hydrochar and Uncarbonized Feedstock Application to Permanent Grassland—Effects on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Plant Growth. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 191, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breulmann, M.; Kuka, K.; van Afferden, M.; Buscot, F.; Fühner, C.; Müller, R.; Schulz, E. Labile Water Soluble Components Govern the Short-Term Microbial Decay of Hydrochar from Sewage Sludge. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 64, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edo, M. Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC): Valorisation of Organic Waste and Sewage Sludges for Hydrochar Production and Biofertilizers; IEA: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- WHITE, P.J. Calcium in Plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subbarao, G.V.; Ito, O.; Berry, W.L.; Wheeler, R.M. Sodium—A Functional Plant Nutrient. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003, 22, 391–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idowu, I.; Li, L.; Flora, J.R.V.; Pellechia, P.J.; Darko, S.A.; Ro, K.S.; Berge, N.D. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Food Waste for Nutrient Recovery and Reuse. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 480–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aragón-Briceño, C.I.; Pozarlik, A.K.; Bramer, E.A.; Niedzwiecki, L.; Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Brem, G. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Wet Biomass from Nitrogen and Phosphorus Approach: A Review. Renew. Energy 2021, 171, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falk, J.; Skoglund, N.; Grimm, A.; Öhman, M. Fate of Phosphorus in Fixed Bed Combustion of Biomass and Sewage Sludge. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 4587–4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dima, S.S.; Arnob, A.; Salma, U.; Kabir, K.B.; Kirtania, K. Fate of Nutrients during Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biogenic Municipal Waste. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2020, 12, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Basar, I.A.; Nzihou, A.; Eskicioglu, C. Hydrochar Derived from Municipal Sludge through Hydrothermal Processing: A Critical Review on Its Formation, Characterization, and Valorization. Water Res. 2021, 199, 117186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaneeckhaute, C.; Meers, E.; Michels, E.; Christiaens, P.; Tack, F.M.G. Fate of Macronutrients in Water Treatment of Digestate Using Vibrating Reversed Osmosis. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 223, 1593–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vaneeckhaute, C.; Lebuf, V.; Michels, E.; Belia, E.; Vanrolleghem, P.A.; Tack, F.M.G.; Meers, E. Nutrient Recovery from Digestate: Systematic Technology Review and Product Classification. Waste Biomass Valorization 2016, 8, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Malhotra, M.; Garg, A. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Centrifuged Sewage Sludge: Determination of Resource Recovery from Liquid Fraction and Thermal Behaviour of Hydrochar. Waste Manag. 2020, 117, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Capua, F.; de Sario, S.; Ferraro, A.; Petrella, A.; Race, M.; Pirozzi, F.; Fratino, U.; Spasiano, D. Phosphorous Removal and Recovery from Urban Wastewater: Current Practices and New Directions. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azam, H.M.; Alam, S.T.; Hasan, M.; Yameogo, D.D.S.; Kannan, A.D.; Rahman, A.; Kwon, M.J. Phosphorous in the Environment: Characteristics with Distribution and Effects, Removal Mechanisms, Treatment Technologies, and Factors Affecting Recovery as Minerals in Natural and Engineered Systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 20183–20207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nobaharan, K.; Bagheri Novair, S.; Asgari Lajayer, B.; van Hullebusch, E. Phosphorus Removal from Wastewater: The Potential Use of Biochar and the Key Controlling Factors. Water 2021, 13, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eriksson, O.; Carlsson Reich, M.; Frostell, B.; Björklund, A.; Assefa, G.; Sundqvist, J.-O.; Granath, J.; Baky, A.; Thyselius, L. Municipal Solid Waste Management from a Systems Perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarrion, A.; Diaz, E.; de la Rubia, M.A.; Mohedano, A.F. Fate of Nutrients during Hydrothermal Treatment of Food Waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 125954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reza, M.T.; Freitas, A.; Yang, X.; Hiibel, S.; Lin, H.; Coronella, C.J. Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of Cow Manure: Carbon and Nitrogen Distributions in HTC Products. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2016, 35, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Guo, Y.; Peng, N.; Lang, Q.; Xia, Y.; Gai, C.; Liu, Z. Nitrogen Transformation among Char, Tar and Gas during Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge and Corresponding Hydrochar. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 126, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhnidi, M.-J.; Wüst, D.; Funke, A.; Hang, L.; Kruse, A. Fate of Nitrogen, Phosphate, and Potassium during Hydrothermal Carbonization and the Potential for Nutrient Recovery. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15507–15516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Xu, J.; Liang, Q. Behavior of Phosphorus during Co-Gasification of Sewage Sludge and Coal. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 2830–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dieguez-Alonso, A.; Funke, A.; Anca-Couce, A.; Rombolà, A.; Ojeda, G.; Bachmann, J.; Behrendt, F. Towards Biochar and Hydrochar Engineering—Influence of Process Conditions on Surface Physical and Chemical Properties, Thermal Stability, Nutrient Availability, Toxicity and Wettability. Energies 2018, 11, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chrispim, M.C.; Scholz, M.; Nolasco, M.A. Phosphorus Recovery from Municipal Wastewater Treatment: Critical Review of Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 248, 109268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, A.I.; Reza, M.T. Techno-Economic Assessment of Superactivated Hydrochar Production by KOH Impregnation Compared to Direct Chemical Activation. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Becker, G.C.; Faweya, N.; Rodriguez Correa, C.; Yang, S.; Xie, X.; Kruse, A. Fertilizer and Activated Carbon Production by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Digestate. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2017, 8, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, N.; Yan, T.; Qiao, J.; Cao, H. Adsorption of Arsenic, Phosphorus and Chromium by Bismuth Impregnated Biochar: Adsorption Mechanism and Depleted Adsorbent Utilization. Chemosphere 2016, 164, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, H.; Zhang, N.; Chen, N.; Lei, Z.; Shimizu, K.; Zhang, Z. Efficient Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by MgAl-LDHs Modified Hydrochar Derived from Tobacco Stalk. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 8, 100348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hachiya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Interactions between Nitrate and Ammonium in Their Uptake, Allocation, Assimilation, and Signaling in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, erw449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schachtman, D.; Reid, R.; Ayling, S. Phosphorus Uptake by Plants: From Soil to Cell. Plant Physiol 1998, 116, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lorick, D.; Macura, B.; Ahlström, M.; Grimvall, A.; Harder, R. Effectiveness of Struvite Precipitation and Ammonia Stripping for Recovery of Phosphorus and Nitrogen from Anaerobic Digestate: A Systematic Review. Environ. Evid. 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siciliano, A.; Limonti, C.; Curcio, G.M.; Molinari, R. Advances in Struvite Precipitation Technologies for Nutrients Removal and Recovery from Aqueous Waste and Wastewater. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stutzenstein, P.; Bacher, M.; Rosenau, T.; Pfeifer, C. Optimization of Nutrient and Carbon Recovery from Anaerobic Digestate via Hydrothermal Carbonization and Investigation of the Influence of the Process Parameters. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 9, 1303–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fei, Y.; Zhao, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Tang, Y.; Huang, X.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, T.; Liu, C. Feasibility of Sewage Sludge Derived Hydrochars for Agricultural Application: Nutrients (N, P, K) and Potentially Toxic Elements (Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cd). Chemosphere 2019, 236, 124841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavitha, B.; Reddy, P.V.L.; Kim, B.; Lee, S.S.; Pandey, S.K.; Kim, K.-H. Benefits and Limitations of Biochar Amendment in Agricultural Soils: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 227, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saddawi, A.; Jones, J.M.; Williams, A.; Le Coeur, C. Commodity Fuels from Biomass through Pretreatment and Torrefaction: Effects of Mineral Content on Torrefied Fuel Characteristics and Quality. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 6466–6474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vassilev, S.V.; Baxter, D.; Andersen, L.K.; Vassileva, C.G.; Morgan, T.J. An Overview of the Organic and Inorganic Phase Composition of Biomass. Fuel 2012, 94, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, Y.; Zhao, D.; Cao, Y.; Huot, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, T. Phosphorous Retention and Release by Sludge-Derived Hydrochar for Potential Use as a Soil Amendment. J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez, C.; Boily, J.-F.; Jansson, S.; Gustafsson, T.; Fick, J. Acid-Induced Phosphorus Release from Hydrothermally Carbonized Sewage Sludge. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 6555–6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shettigondahalli Ekanthalu, V.; Narra, S.; Ender, T.; Antwi, E.; Nelles, M. Influence of Post- and Pre-Acid Treatment during Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge on P-Transformation and the Characteristics of Hydrochar. Processes 2022, 10, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takaya, C.A.; Fletcher, L.A.; Singh, S.; Anyikude, K.U.; Ross, A.B. Phosphate and Ammonium Sorption Capacity of Biochar and Hydrochar from Different Wastes. Chemosphere 2016, 145, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Lehmann, J.; Hanley, K.; Hestrin, R.; Enders, A. Adsorption and Desorption of Ammonium by Maple Wood Biochar as a Function of Oxidation and PH. Chemosphere 2015, 138, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Islam, M.T.; Sultana, A.I.; Chambers, C.; Saha, S.; Saha, N.; Kirtania, K.; Reza, M.T. Recent Progress on Emerging Applications of Hydrochar. Energies 2022, 15, 9340. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249340
Islam MT, Sultana AI, Chambers C, Saha S, Saha N, Kirtania K, Reza MT. Recent Progress on Emerging Applications of Hydrochar. Energies. 2022; 15(24):9340. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249340
Chicago/Turabian StyleIslam, Md Tahmid, Al Ibtida Sultana, Cadianne Chambers, Swarna Saha, Nepu Saha, Kawnish Kirtania, and M. Toufiq Reza. 2022. "Recent Progress on Emerging Applications of Hydrochar" Energies 15, no. 24: 9340. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249340