Next Article in Journal
Experimental Optimization with the Emphasis on Techno-Economic Analysis of Production and Purification of High Value-Added Bioethanol from Sustainable Corn Stover
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Voltage Control of a Buck DC-DC Converter: A Sliding Mode Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Power Systems Imitate Nature for Improved Performance Use of Nature-Inspired Optimization Techniques

Fukushima Renewable Energy Institute, AIST (FREA), Koriyama 963-0298, Japan
Energies 2022, 15(17), 6129; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176129
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022

1. Introduction

Renewable energy transition creates unprecedented issues in power system control, operation and protection. In order to mitigate these challenges, novel solutions are required. One approach is imitating the behavioral patterns of animals such as butterflies, ants, wolves or whales. Their optimized behavior in different stages of life such as hunting, or foraging can be used as a guide for other complex systems. When employed in a suitable way, their natural behavior helps to optimize interactions between different renewable-energy based generators and create a more stable microgrid [1,2].
One of the ways in which these optimization techniques can be implemented is managing the intermittent behavior of renewable resources [3]. There are other implementations of such optimization approaches. For instance, they can be utilized to predict and mitigate electricity theft [4] or develop inverters with higher performances [5,6,7] or control torque in electrical machines [8]. More sophisticated designs include the control of virtual power plants for deep renewable energy penetration [9], a more efficient energy routing [10] and an optimal power flow [11], as well as the control of frequency control for stability [12,13,14]. These solutions are not only limited to power system operation. Recently, researchers have been using such optimizations to maximize profits in the competitive energy markets with renewable energy participation, organize demand side response schemes [15] and even to detect and mitigate cyberattacks.
It goes without saying that there are many more such techniques. For instance, one technique is to use an artificial bee colony [16], where a bee’s foraging for nectar and subsequent dancing to guide the other bees to the food source is modeled, whereas the particle swarm optimization foraging behavior of birds or fish over a large swath of land can also be utilized to find the optimum solutions points for a specific function [17]. There are more novel approaches such as those that are based on the unique hunting behavior of humpback whales [18] or the internal dynamics of wolf packs during hunting [19]. Regardless of their origin of inspiration, all of these approaches count on the fact that nature always finds the most optimal way of doing something which is desperately required for survival.

2. Conclusions

Modern power systems, when utilized, are pushed closer to their physical limits. This means there are smaller margins for any errors in operation or planning. To operate an efficient system within these tight limits, everything must be optimized as much as possible. Recent studies show that optimization techniques found in nature can help to fill this important knowledge gap. Animals, as well as plants, have developed these optimized operations which have stood the test of time, on the order of thousands or millions of years. When applied to modern power system issues, they can help stabilized system frequency, increase renewable energy penetration and detect cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It is a relatively new research area with many exciting opportunities.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iqbal, Z.; Javaid, N.; Mohsin, S.M.; Akber, S.M.A.; Afzal, M.K.; Ishmanov, F. Performance Analysis of Hybridization of Heuristic Techniques for Residential Load Scheduling. Energies 2018, 11, 2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hussain, I.; Das, D.C.; Sinha, N.; Latif, A.; Hussain, S.M.S.; Ustun, T.S. Performance Assessment of an Islanded Hybrid Power System with Different Storage Combinations Using an FPA-Tuned Two-Degree-of-Freedom (2DOF) Controller. Energies 2020, 13, 5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Farooq, Z.; Rahman, A.; Hussain, S.M.S.; Ustun, T.S. Power Generation Control of Renewable Energy Based Hybrid Deregulated Power System. Energies 2022, 15, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akram, R.; Ayub, N.; Khan, I.; Albogamy, F.R.; Rukh, G.; Khan, S.; Shiraz, M.; Rizwan, K. Towards Big Data Electricity Theft Detection Based on Improved RUSBoost Classifiers in Smart Grid. Energies 2021, 14, 8029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ali, M.; Tariq, M.; Upadhyay, D.; Khan, S.A.; Satpathi, K.; Alamri, B.; Alahmadi, A.A. Genetic Algorithm Based PI Control with 12-Band Hysteresis Current Control of an Asymmetrical 13-Level Inverter. Energies 2021, 14, 6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rezk, H.; Fathy, A. Stochastic Fractal Search Optimization Algorithm Based Global MPPT for Triple-Junction Photovoltaic Solar System. Energies 2020, 13, 4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yesilbudak, M. Parameter Extraction of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules Using Grey Wolf Optimizer with Dimension Learning-Based Hunting Search Strategy. Energies 2021, 14, 5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Djerioui, A.; Houari, A.; Machmoum, M.; Ghanes, M. Grey Wolf Optimizer-Based Predictive Torque Control for Electric Buses Applications. Energies 2020, 13, 5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdolrasol, M.G.M.; Hannan, M.A.; Hussain, S.M.S.; Ustun, T.S.; Sarker, M.R.; Ker, P.J. Energy Management Scheduling for Microgrids in the Virtual Power Plant System Using Artificial Neural Networks. Energies 2021, 14, 6507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hebal, S.; Mechta, D.; Harous, S.; Dhriyyef, M. Hybrid Energy Routing Approach for Energy Internet. Energies 2021, 14, 2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, A.; Hizam, H.; Abdul-Wahab, N.I.; Othman, M.L. Solution of Optimal Power Flow Using Non-Dominated Sorting Multi Objective Based Hybrid Firefly and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. Energies 2020, 13, 4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Latif, A.; Hussain, S.M.S.; Das, D.C.; Ustun, T.S. Optimum Synthesis of a BOA Optimized Novel Dual-Stage PI − (1 + ID) Controller for Frequency Response of a Microgrid. Energies 2020, 13, 3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barik, A.K.; Das, D.C.; Latif, A.; Hussain, S.M.S.; Ustun, T.S. Optimal Voltage–Frequency Regulation in Distributed Sustainable Energy-Based Hybrid Microgrids with Integrated Resource Planning. Energies 2021, 14, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Latif, A.; Hussain, S.M.S.; Das, D.C.; Ustun, T.S. Design and Implementation of Maiden Dual-Level Controller for Ameliorating Frequency Control in a Hybrid Microgrid. Energies 2021, 14, 2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Patil, G.S.; Mulla, A.; Dawn, S.; Ustun, T.S. Profit Maximization with Imbalance Cost Improvement by Solar PV-Battery Hybrid System in Deregulated Power Market. Energies 2022, 15, 5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alshammari, M.E.; Ramli, M.A.M.; Mehedi, I.M. Hybrid Chaotic Maps-Based Artificial Bee Colony for Solving Wind Energy-Integrated Power Dispatch Problem. Energies 2022, 15, 4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alanazi, A.; Alanazi, M. Artificial Electric Field Algorithm-Pattern Search for Many-Criteria Networks Reconfiguration Considering Power Quality and Energy Not Supplied. Energies 2022, 15, 5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Habib, S.; Abbas, G.; Jumani, T.A.; Bhutto, A.A.; Mirsaeidi, S.; Ahmed, E.M. Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm for Transient Response, Robustness, and Stability Enhancement of an Automatic Voltage Regulator System. Energies 2022, 15, 5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alghamdi, A.S. Greedy Sine-Cosine Non-Hierarchical Grey Wolf Optimizer for Solving Non-Convex Economic Load Dispatch Problems. Energies 2022, 15, 3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ustun, T.S. Power Systems Imitate Nature for Improved Performance Use of Nature-Inspired Optimization Techniques. Energies 2022, 15, 6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176129

AMA Style

Ustun TS. Power Systems Imitate Nature for Improved Performance Use of Nature-Inspired Optimization Techniques. Energies. 2022; 15(17):6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ustun, Taha Selim. 2022. "Power Systems Imitate Nature for Improved Performance Use of Nature-Inspired Optimization Techniques" Energies 15, no. 17: 6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop