Next Article in Journal
Influence of Parental Perception of Child’s Physical Fitness on Body Image Satisfaction in Spanish Preschool Children
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental and Social Factors Associated with High Chronic Kidney Disease Mortality Rates in Municipalities of Guatemala: An Ecological Study of Municipal-Level Mortality Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Who Undergo Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Network Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Oral Health Problems among Canadians Aged 45 to 85: Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Baseline Survey (2011–2015)

1
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
2
Applied Research Division, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON K0A 0K9, Canada
3
Office of the Chief Dental Officer, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON K0A 0K9, Canada
4
Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(8), 5533; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085533
Submission received: 26 January 2023 / Revised: 24 March 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Public Health: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities)

Abstract

:
Oral health is a critical component of overall health. The objective of this study was to describe oral health problems among 47,581 adults aged 45 to 85 in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) among those who have at least one natural tooth (92%) and those without natural teeth across various demographic categories. Among the 47,581 participants in the study, 92% reported having at least one natural tooth (dentate). Among those without teeth, 63% reported an income less than CAD 50,000 versus 39% among those with teeth. Whether they had teeth or not, over 30% of people reported two or more oral health problems. Older adults appear to be retaining their natural teeth (28.9%), but still report experiencing oral health problems. As the population ages, loss of all teeth may not be the most useful proxy for poor oral health, and a population-level understanding of oral health problems may help to better define poor oral health.

1. Introduction

Oral health is an important component of overall health, well-being, and quality of life [1]. Globally, oral health problems still remain a significant problem to public health, with dental caries and periodontal disease affecting a significant proportion of the population from children to older adults [2]. However, the burden of oral disease typically has the highest prevalence among the oldest age groups [3]. Specifically, in Canada, 14.2% of adults aged 60–79 years have reported having poor oral health, which is particularly concerning given the aging population [1]. The proportion of seniors aged 65 and older is expected to grow by 70% in the next 20 years [4]; accordingly, the prevalence of oral health-related problems is also expected to increase.
Oral health problems include more than dental caries, gum disease, tooth loss, or oral cancer [5]. It also includes problems with dentures, difficulties eating, or problems associated with the mouth or jaw [1]. Oral health problems have been found to be associated with poor self-perceived general health, and with various chronic conditions, particularly among individuals of lower socioeconomic status [6,7]. Given the aging population, and the association between oral health and perceived overall general health, it is important to explore potential factors associated with oral health to allow for better adapted interventions to be developed. Additionally, problems related to oral health may be prevented; however, without understanding the prevalence of these problems at a national-level, targeted prevention strategies cannot be developed, and guidance cannot be made at the policy or practice level.
A previous study conducted using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) found that self-reported oral health and dental service use varied by several different socioeconomic and demographic factors and regions across Canada. For instance, the highest prevalence of fair/poor oral health was reported by individuals residing in New Brunswick (9.9%), followed by Alberta (9.2%) [6]. This study also noted increased self-reported poor oral health by people of lower income status, as well as those who smoked, were depressed or had poor self-rated general health [6]. However, this study did not specifically look at the different problems that oral health is composed of, including teeth problems (e.g., loose or broken teeth), denture problems (e.g., broken or missing dentures) and gum problems (e.g., sore or bleeding gums).
One factor that is indicative of poor oral health is edentulism, which is the complete loss of natural teeth [6,8]. Older adults are the most likely to suffer from edentulism, with 15% of Canadian adults aged 65 years and older found to be edentate [6]. Edentate adults are more likely to report oral health problems: for instance, the Canadian Health Measure Survey found almost 26% of Canadian adults who were edentulous reported they avoided food because of problems with their mouth [1]. However, it is becoming more common for older adults to retain their natural teeth, suggesting the importance of understanding predictors of oral health among people with and without natural teeth [1]. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of oral health problems among adults aged 45 to 85 in the CLSA by dentate and edentate status. Differences in the prevalence of oral health problems were also explored by sex.

2. Methods

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement for cross-sectional studies guided the preparation of this manuscript [9].

2.1. Study Design, Settingdata Source, and Participants

A cross-sectional study was conducted using secondary data analysis of the CLSA baseline (2011–2015) data. The CLSA is a longitudinal cohort study following 51,338 individuals aged 45 to 85 years at the time of recruitment for over 20 years. To be eligible for inclusion into the CLSA, participants had to reside in one of the 10 Canadian provinces, complete the questionnaires in English or French, have the cognitive ability to participate on their own, and they not be part of the Canadian Armed forces or live on a First Nations reserve. A detailed methodology of the CLSA has previously been published [10]. A total of 3757 people were removed who were missing data on oral health, or incorrectly reported oral health problems (e.g., people who reported having problems with their teeth but also reported not having teeth), leaving a final sample of 47,581 (Figure 1). Ethics approval for this study was received from the Public Health Agency of Canada/Health Canada Research Ethics Board on 24 June 2019 (project id: 2014–0015).

2.2. Oral Health

Self-perceived oral health was measured using the question, “In general, would you say the health of your mouth is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?” Responses were dichotomized as poor/fair and good/very good/excellent. Oral health was also measured by asking participants if they had experienced oral health problems in the past 12 months, including toothache; an inability to chew adequately; loose/ill-fitting, broken, or missing dentures; swelling in the mouth; dry mouth; burning mouth; sore jaw muscles; painful jaw joints; natural tooth decay; natural loose tooth; gums around natural teeth being sore; gums around natural teeth bleeding; denture-related sores; dirty teeth or dentures; and bad breath. Some oral health problems were grouped together given the small proportion of people who reported them (Table 1). To measure if participants had natural teeth, they were asked “Do you have one or more of your original teeth?”. If participants answered yes, then they were classified as dentate; if they answered no, they were classified as edentate, indicating they had no natural teeth. Participants were also asked, “Do you wear dentures or false teeth?”. People among the dentate group were further classified as wearing dentures versus no dentures. Stratification by denture status was not performed for edentate participants given the small sample size.

2.3. Other Covariates

Potential confounding variables included age (categorized as 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–85), sex (male or female), total household income (<CAD 50,000, CAD 50,000–CAD 100,000, >CAD 100,000) and education (categorized as secondary school or less versus post-secondary degree/diploma). Self-perceived general health was measured using the question, “In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor”. Response options ranged from poor to excellent. Since there was not an equal distribution of responses to all 5 options, perceived general health were dichotomized into poor/fair vs. good/very good/excellent. Poor general health was operationally defined by participants reporting the presence of at least one chronic condition including, but not limited to, diabetes, cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, allergies. (Yes ≥ 1 conditions vs. No = 0 conditions). This classification of chronic conditions has previously been used in other Canadian population surveys [11].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were completed using SAS 9.4. This study was conducted following a descriptive epidemiology framework [12]. The prevalence of oral health problems was estimated using weighted frequencies which were calculated as percentages using sampling weights, and chi-square tests were used to estimate if groups were statistically different. The prevalence of oral health problems was stratified by important population descriptors including edentate status and sex.

3. Results

Among the sample (n = 47,581), 92% of people reported having one or more natural teeth (dentate), and the remaining 8% reported having no natural teeth (Table 1). The majority of those with teeth (71%) were aged 45 to 64 years, whereas the majority of those without teeth (61%) were 65 to 85 years. A high proportion of people without teeth (63.0%) reported a total household income less than CAD 50,000. It was determined that 81.1% of people within this household income group were less than 65 years of age, suggesting retirement was not the driving factor behind the lower reported household income (data not shown). Regardless of edentulism status, over 90% of respondents perceived their oral health as good, very good or excellent, even though 26.6% of dentate and 34.7% of edentate respondents reported two or more oral health problems.
Problems with dentures, including denture-related sores, uncomfortable dentures, and dentures being loose or not fitting were reported by a higher proportion of people within the edentate group. Problems with gums were reported by more people with teeth compared to those without teeth across both males and females. A complete description of oral health problems among males and females by edentulism status can be found in Table 2.

4. Discussion

We found that different demographic characteristics increase the risk of edentulism, while a high proportion of all participants report experiencing at least one oral health problem. Although most (60%) reported having one or more oral health problems, 93% of the dentate sample and 91% of the edentate sample perceived their oral health as good, very good, or excellent. We did not find differences when reporting oral health problems among males compared to females.
Given the established association between oral health and general health, the focus is often put on preventing oral health problems to support improving overall health [6,7,13]. As people age, the burden of disease associated with oral health increases [1]. Edentulism status is often used as a proxy for determining the oral health of a population [1,8]. However, during the last decade, it has been shown that older adults are retaining more natural teeth as they age, but are still experiencing oral health problems, which is consistent with the findings of this study [14]. Given the aging population, and the increase in oral disease among older adults, it is critical that prevention and intervention strategies are developed to reduce the burden associated with oral health problems. Self-perceived oral health also does not appear to be a perfect indicator of oral health, as we found over 90% of people among both the dentate and edentate groups perceived their oral health as good, very good, or excellent, but still reported experiencing oral health problems. It is also important to note the estimate of self-perceived good, very good, or excellent oral health reported in the current study is slightly higher than a previous estimate from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) back in 2007–2009, which found 84.5% of Canadians reported their oral health to be good, very good, or excellent [1].
Oral health problems are prevalent globally [15]. It is estimated that oral health problems affect 3.5 billion people around the world. The global prevalence of edentulism for adults is estimated to be about 7%, with 23% of those 60 years old and older being edentulous [5]. Our findings for Canadians older than 45 years old was that 8% of people have reported having no natural teeth, with about 12% of those aged 65–74 years and about 20% 75 years and older being edentulous. Older Canadians, similar to the patterns of other economically developed countries [15], are retaining teeth in older age [16]. In our study, those with teeth and those edentulous continue to express that they have oral health problems across all age groups.
Similar to global reports, the most commonly reported oral health problems in our study were problems with gums and tooth decay among both males and females [17]. It is estimated that almost 2.5 billion and 1 billion people are affected by tooth decay and severe gum disease, respectively, across the world [17]. Differences have been noted in the prevalence of oral health problems by demographic characteristics, such as age, education, race or income [18,19]. Although we explored edentulism status by different socioeconomic factors, we did not explore variation in oral health problems, highlighting the need for continued research. Clinical examinations by a dentist during the CHMS found that more than one-third of the participants (34% of dentate and 41% of edentate) needed dental treatment [16]. Self-rated oral health is associated with oral health indicators such as clinical measures of caries, or loss of periodontal attachment [20]. The current study captures this oral health burden reflecting oral disease, as well as expanding into a greater definition of oral health comprising denture comfort, chewing ability, and dry mouth.

Strengths and Limitations

This study contributes to the literature on understanding oral health problems among the aging population within Canada using the CLSA and its large sample size of over 47,000 people. The CLSA is a novel data source that has collected comprehensive information on oral health problems, as well as other demographic and behavior-based information. The study applied sampling weights, allowing for better inferences to be made and overcoming biases associated with how participants were recruited.
The limitations of this current study include its cross-sectional design, which makes it difficult to establish temporality. However, with the future availability of CLSA follow-up data, this limitation can be overcome, as longitudinal studies can be conducted. Furthermore, data were self-reported; previous studies have noted potential inaccuracies associated with self-reported recall [21,22]. These differences in the ability to self-report oral health problems may be related to the specific oral health problem, or different socioeconomic or demographic factors [21] Finally, it is important to note that the CLSA sample may not be representative of the Canadian population; however, the findings of this paper can be generalized to people who share similar characteristics to those who are included in the current study [23].
Although this paper utilized a descriptive approach, it is helpful for understanding the burden of oral health problems among Canadian adults. The findings of this research can be used to inform research questions that plan to use an analytic approach to study risk factors for oral health problems. These findings can be used by public health professionals who are interested in developing strategies to improve oral health, thus improving overall health and well-being. For instance, these findings provide evidence that various oral health problems are prevalent among Canadian adults, and this varies by edentulism status, which can be used to design potential programming that may be used to promote healthy behaviors that could also, in turn, promote better oral health. Finally, oral health professionals can use the findings from this paper to help to identify those who are at high risk of oral health problems, and therefore provide them with education regarding the importance of oral health.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that edentulism status may not be the best proxy for understanding the burden of disease associated with oral health, as we found that the proportion of people reporting oral health problems was comparable regardless of edentulism status. It was also apparent that self-perception of oral health was not a good indicator of oral health problems. Identifying high-risk subgroups within the population who may be at a greater risk of increased oral health problems, and a better understanding of what those oral health problems are, could be used to inform prevention strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.D.R., Y.J., M.d.G., L.D., A.B., H.M. and C.W.B.; formal analysis, V.D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, V.D.R., F.B. and C.W.B.; writing—review and editing, V.D.R., Y.J., M.d.G., L.D., A.B., H.M, F.B. and C.W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the Public Health Agency of Canada/Health Canada.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants when recruited into the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (www.clsa-elcv.ca for researchers who meet the criteria for access to de-identified CLSA data.

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible using the data/biospecimens collected by the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Funding for the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under grant reference: LSA 94473 and the Canada Foundation for Innovation, as well as the following provinces: Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, and British Columbia. This research has been conducted using the CLSA (Baseline Comprehensive Dataset version 4.0 and Baseline Tracking Dataset version 3.4) under Application ID # 1906001. The CLSA is led by Parminder Raina, Christina Wolfson and Susan Kirkland.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The opinions expressed in this manuscript are the author’s own and do not reflect the views of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging or the Government of Canada.

References

  1. Health Canada. Report on the Findings of the Oral Health Component of the Canadian Health Measures Survey 2007–2009; Health Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2010; ISBN 9781100156606. [Google Scholar]
  2. Petersen, P.E.; Bourgeois, D.; Ogawa, H.; Estupinan-Day, S.; Ndiaye, C. The Global Burden of Oral Diseases and Risks to Oral Health. Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Griffin, S.O.; Jones, J.A.; Brunson, D.; Griffin, P.M.; Bailey, W.D. Burden of Oral Disease among Older Adults and Implications for Public Health Priorities. Am. J. Public Health 2012, 102, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Infographic: Canada’s Seniors Population Outlook: Uncharted Territory|CIHI. Available online: https://www.cihi.ca/en/infographic-canadas-seniors-population-outlook-uncharted-territory (accessed on 16 September 2021).
  5. World Health Organization. Oral Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  6. Bassim, C.W.; MacEntee, M.I.; Nazmul, S.; Bedard, C.; Liu, S.; Ma, J.; Griffith, L.E.; Raina, P. Self-Reported Oral Health at Baseline of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2020, 48, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kandelman, D.; Petersen, P.E.; Ueda, H. Oral Health, General Health, and Quality of Life in Older People. Spec. Care Dent. 2008, 28, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cunha-Cruz, J.; Hujoel, P.P.; Nadanovsky, P. Secular Trends in Socio-Economic Disparities in Edentulism: USA, 1972–2001. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. STROBE Initiative Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. BMJ 2007, 335, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Raina, P.; Wolfson, C.; Kirkland, S.; Griffith, L.E.; Balion, C.; Cossette, B.; Dionne, I.; Hofer, S.; Hogan, D.; van den Heuvel, E.R.; et al. Cohort Profile: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 1752–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Support Documentation: Derived Variable—Chronic Conditions (CCT/CCC) (Tracking and Comprehensive Assessments). Available online: https://www.clsa-elcv.ca/doc/2755 (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  12. Lesko, C.R.; Fox, M.P.; Edwards, J.K. A Framework for Descriptive Epidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2022, 191, 2063–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brennan, D.S.; Singh, K.A. General Health and Oral Health Self-Ratings, and Impact of Oral Problems among Older Adults. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2011, 119, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Coll, P.P.; Lindsay, A.; Meng, J.; Gopalakrishna, A.; Raghavendra, S.; Bysani, P.; O’Brien, D. The Prevention of Infections in Older Adults: Oral Health. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2020, 68, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peres, M.A.; Macpherson, L.M.D.; Weyant, R.J.; Daly, B.; Venturelli, R.; Mathur, M.R.; Listl, S.; Celeste, R.K.; Guarnizo-Herreño, C.C.; Kearns, C.; et al. Oral Diseases: A Global Public Health Challenge. Lancet 2019, 394, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bernabe, E.; Marcenes, W.; Hernandez, C.R.; Bailey, J.; Abreu, L.G.; Alipour, V.; Amini, S.; Arabloo, J.; Arefi, Z.; Arora, A.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. World Health Organization. Global Oral Health Status Report: Towards Universal Health Coverage for Oral Health by 2030. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240061484 (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  18. Kim, J.K.; Baker, L.A.; Seirawan, H.; Crimmins, E.M. Prevalence of Oral Health Problems in U.S. Adults, NHANES 1999–2004: Exploring Differences by Age, Education, and Race/Ethnicity. Spec. Care Dent. 2012, 32, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Marthaler, T.M.; Brunelle, J.; Downer, M.C.; König, K.G.; Truin, G.J.; Künzel, W.; O’Mullane, D.M.; Møller, I.J.; von der Fehr, F.R.; Vrbic, V. The Prevalence of Dental Caries in Europe 1990–1995. CRE 1996, 30, 237–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Thomson, W.M.; Mejia, G.C.; Broadbent, J.M.; Poulton, R. Construct Validity of Locker’s Global Oral Health Item. J. Dent. Res. 2012, 91, 1038–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pitiphat, W.; Garcia, R.I.; Douglass, C.W.; Joshipura, K.J. Validation of Self-Reported Oral Health Measures. J. Public Health Dent. 2002, 62, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Blicher, B.; Joshipura, K.; Eke, P. Validation of Self-Reported Periodontal Disease: A Systematic Review. J. Dent. Res. 2005, 84, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Raina, P.S.; Wolfson, C.; Kirkland, S.A.; Griffith, L.E.; Oremus, M.; Patterson, C.; Tuokko, H.; Penning, M.; Balion, C.M.; Hogan, D.; et al. The Canadian longitudinal study on aging (CLSA). Can. J. Aging Rev. Can. Vieil. 2009, 28, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) participants included in the current study at baseline (2011–2015).
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) participants included in the current study at baseline (2011–2015).
Ijerph 20 05533 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of Canadian adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging at baseline (2011–2015), by teeth status.
Table 1. Characteristics of Canadian adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging at baseline (2011–2015), by teeth status.
VariablesDentate (with Teeth)Edentate (without Teeth)
OverallNo DenturesWith Denturesp-Value 1
Age group
   45–54
   55–64
   65–74
   75–85

39.8%
31.3%
18.4%
10.5%

45.2%
31.1%
15.9%
7.8%

21.1%
32.1%
26.9%
19.9%
<0.0001
11.4%
27.1%
31.1%
30.3%
Sex
   Male
   Female

48.9%
51.1%

49.1%
50.9%

48.2%
51.8%
0.30
44.0%
56.0%
Household income
   <CAD 50,000
   CAD 50,000–100,000
   >CAD 100,000

24.5%
37.2%
38.4%

20.3%
36.3%
43.4%

39.0%
40.2%
20.9%
<0.0001
63.0%
27.0%
10.0%
Education
   Secondary school or less
   Post-secondary degree/diploma

24.5%
75.5%

21.7%
78.3%

34.3%
65.7%
<0.0001
50.6%
49.4%
Chronic conditions
   No
   At least 1

10.7%
89.3%

11.7%
88.3%

7.0%
93.0%
<0.0001


4.5%
95.5%
Self-perceived general health
   Poor/fair
   Good/very good/excellent

10.0%
90.0%

9.1%
90.9%

13.1%
86.9%
<0.0001
20.0%
80.0%
Self-perceived oral health
   Poor/fair
   Good/very good/excellent

7.3%
92.7%

6.0%
94.0%

11.9%
88.1%
<0.0001
8.7%
91.3%
Number of oral health problems
   0
   1
   2 or more

38.0%
25.3%
26.6%

39.3%
25.8%
34.9%

33.7%
23.8%
42.5%
<0.0001

38.8%
26.5%
34.7%
1. Chi-square test performed to determine if people among the dentate group who had dentures were statistically different than those without dentures.
Table 2. Percentage of oral health problems among males and females from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) at CLSA baseline (2011–2015), by teeth status.
Table 2. Percentage of oral health problems among males and females from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) at CLSA baseline (2011–2015), by teeth status.
Oral Health ProblemsMalesFemales
Dentate (with teeth)Edentate (without Teeth)Dentate (with Teeth)Edentate
(without Teeth)
OverallNo DenturesDenturesp-Value 1OverallNo DenturesDenturesp-Value 1
Oral Health Problems
    No
    1
    2 or more

38.3%
25.3%
36.4%

39.2%
26.1%
34.7%

35.4%
22.5%
42.1%
<0.0001
43.4%
24.8%
31.8%

37.8%
25.4%
36.8%

39.4%
25.5%
35.1%

32.2%
25.0%
42.8%
<0.0001
35.2%
27.8%
37.0%
Teeth Problems
    Tooth Loose5.7%4.9%8.5%<0.0001N/A6.2%4.7%11.0%<0.0001N/A
    Tooth Broken14.5%15.2%12.1%0.001N/A11.3%11.9%9.2%0.001N/A
    Toothache16.6%17.1%14.8%0.02N/A14.0%14.3%13.1%0.18N/A
    Tooth Decay20.1%20.2%19.8%0.70N/A16.0%15.6%17.3%0.08N/A
Denture Problems
    Denture-related sores, uncomfortable, loose/do not fit 24.4%N/A19.9%N/A34.3%4.4%N/A19.2%N/A38.1%
    Dentures broken/missing 2 1.2%N/A5.4%N/A5.1%1.1%N/A4.6%N/A3.1%
Gum Problems
    Gums sore/bleed21.7%22.5%19.0%0.0012.3%20.4%20.8%18.8%0.062.3%
Other Oral Health Problems
    Swelling/burning in mouth 26.2%5.7%7.8%0.0027.9%7.4%6.7%9.3%0.00029.0%
    Jaw muscles sore/joints painful 26.8%7.0%5.7%0.055.6%12.6%13.5%9.6%<0.00110.2%
    Cannot chew adequately8.7%8.1%11.2%<0.000112.3%9.4%8.4%12.7%<0.000117.6%
    Dry mouth15.8%15.1%18.6%0.000223.6%19.3%17.6%24.7%<0.000131.8%
    Teeth or dentures dirty, bad breath, and others 215.4%16.1%12.6%0.000210.6%13.2%13.1%13.6%0.5311.4%
1. Chi-square test performed to determine if people among the dentate group who had dentures were statistically different than those without dentures. 2. Oral health problems collapsed due to small sample sizes. Participants reported one or more of listed problems
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Rubeis, V.; Jiang, Y.; de Groh, M.; Dufour, L.; Bronsard, A.; Morrison, H.; Butt, F.; Walker Bassim, C. Oral Health Problems among Canadians Aged 45 to 85: Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Baseline Survey (2011–2015). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085533

AMA Style

De Rubeis V, Jiang Y, de Groh M, Dufour L, Bronsard A, Morrison H, Butt F, Walker Bassim C. Oral Health Problems among Canadians Aged 45 to 85: Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Baseline Survey (2011–2015). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(8):5533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085533

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Rubeis, Vanessa, Ying Jiang, Margaret de Groh, Lisette Dufour, Annie Bronsard, Howard Morrison, Fahad Butt, and Carol Walker Bassim. 2023. "Oral Health Problems among Canadians Aged 45 to 85: Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Baseline Survey (2011–2015)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 8: 5533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085533

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop