Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Personality Traits on Patient Satisfaction after Telerehabilitation: A Comparative Study of Remote and Face-to-Face Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation during COVID-19 Lockdown
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Postural Changes and Musculoskeletal Disorders in Young Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Predictive Potential of Physiological Measures of Human Thermal Strain in Outdoor Environments in Hot and Humid Areas in Summer—A Case Study of Shanghai, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Virtual Reality Exercises versus Isokinetic Exercises in comparison with Conventional Exercises on the Imaging Findings and Inflammatory Biomarker Changes in Soccer Players with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 6
10.3390/ijerph20065016
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of 3D Postural Correction and Abdominal Muscle Contraction on the Symmetry of the Transverse Abdominis and Spinal Alignment in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis

by
Sung-Young Yoon
1,2 and
Sang-Yeol Lee
3,*
1
Department of Physical Therapy, Busan Health University, Busan 49318, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduated School of Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 5016; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065016
Submission received: 10 January 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 12 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiotherapy and Exercise Rehabilitation to Cure Diseases and Improve Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of 3D postural correction (3DPC) using corrective cushions (CCs) and abdominal muscle contraction (AMC) on the thickness symmetry of the transversus abdominis (TrA) and spinal alignment in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). In the first experiment, ultrasound measurements were taken of the TrA thickness on both the convex and concave sides of the lumbar curve in the supine position during AMC and non-AMC without 3DPC, and during AMC and non-AMC with 3DPC using CCs, in 11 IS patients. In the second experiment, 37 IS patients participated in a four-week 3DPC exercise program that aimed to maintain TrA thickness symmetry based on the results of the first experiment. The study found that TrA thickness symmetry significantly increased after 3DPC using CCs and combined with AMC (p < 0.05). Additionally, the Cobb angles and trunk rotation angles showed significant decreases, and trunk expansion showed a significant increase (p < 0.05). These results indicate that the simultaneous application of 3DPC and AMC is the most effective way to achieve TrA thickness symmetry in IS patients. Therefore, 3DPC and AMC should be considered as crucial elements in exercise interventions for IS patients.

1. Introduction

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) refers to three-dimensional (3D) deformities of the trunk and spine resulting from various causes that occur during growth and throughout life. It is characterized not only by deformities of the lateral spinal curve and deviations from the anatomical central axis in the frontal plane but also by deformities of the vertebral body rotation and loss of the normal curve state in the sagittal plane [1,2,3].
IS can cause secondary problems due to abnormal structural changes in the vertebral body and disks, and can gradually lead to changes in trunk interactions. As a result, it may increase trunk instability, thereby causing asymmetries in shoulder height, ribs, trunk shape, and musculoskeletal system [4,5].
IS can affect the posture of adolescents, promoting a negative self-image and disturbing self-esteem, which could potentially lead to psychological problems [6,7,8]. If IS is not treated properly, it may lead to serious deformities of the trunk and reduced chest circumference and motor ability. It can affect quality-of-life aspects such as general health and work capabilities [9,10]. Other studies have found that trunk asymmetries (e.g., thickness, power) and weakness or improper function (e.g., onset timing, recruitment patterns) of abdominal muscles (oblique external (OE), oblique internal (OI), and transversus abdominis (TrA)) were the cause of spinal deformities [11,12,13,14,15].
Ultrasound imaging can easily and safely assess the thickness and location of, and changes to, deep abdominal muscles [16,17]. Linek et al. [18] compared the thickness of the abdominal muscles of adolescents with IS with that of a control group using ultrasound, and found that the OE, OI, and TrA muscles were overall thinner bilaterally in the IS group. Other studies have reported differences in thickness between the left and right sides of the TrA when the abdominal muscles of IS patients are contracted [16,19]. Since the difference in thickness of the TrA leads to the asymmetry of trunk and spine, treatment should focus on exercises targeting symmetry.
To treat IS, surgical intervention, physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercise (PSSE), and conservative interventions, such as braces, can be used [20,21,22]. The purpose of conservative interventions is to prevent not only curve progression, which is the primary aim, but also potential complications such as postural asymmetry, changes in trunk appearance, back pain, and adverse psychosocial effects [9,23,24,25]. Conservative intervention methods include a PSSE specifically designed for IS [26,27,28,29]. The common principles of PSSE are 3D self-correction, patient education, training in activities of daily living, and stabilization of the corrected posture [22,29,30]. The most crucial element of these common principles is 3D self-correction, which refers to correction along with autonomous muscle contraction using external aids, such as corrective cushions (CCs). Several studies have emphasized the importance of 3D self-correction and symmetric muscle contraction, which constitute the basic approach of conservative IS treatments [19,31,32].
Although some previous studies have verified the thickness asymmetry between the left and right sides of the OE, OI, and TrA muscles of IS patients, few studies have investigated the symmetry of abdominal muscle thickness on the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curve when three-dimensionally aligned in real-time. We hypothesized that better TrA symmetry was achieved through 3D postural correction (3DPC) and AMC, and that this may have the beneficial effect of decreasing curve severity. Thus, this study aimed to quantitatively investigate TrA thickness symmetry when IS patients were 3D-aligned. Furthermore, the study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 3D postural correction (3DPC) intervention in maintaining symmetry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This study involved patients living in Busan, South Korea, diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) between the ages of 10 and 30 years. These patients had Cobb angles ranging from 10° to 45°, and their accompanying vertebral body rotation and lateral deviation were confirmed through radiological findings. The patients had no history of braces or other conservative treatments. All curve types were recruited according to the Rigo classification [29,33,34,35]. This classification method uses clinical and radiological criteria, and is designed to overcome the limitations of the classification method that focuses on surgical treatment and the promotion of conservative treatment methods. All the patients were fully informed of the experimental procedures and provided informed consent before participating. Patients with functional scoliosis due to muscle imbalance or pain, congenital scoliosis, or neuromuscular scoliosis, patients with recent neurological or orthopedic diseases of the upper extremities, lower extremities, or lower back, patients with a history of spinal surgery, and patients with differences in leg length were excluded from the study. Basic information on the patients, including age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI), was collected. To determine the sample size, the G-Power program (Kiel University, Germany) was used [36]. For the first experiment, the sample size was calculated to compare the means between conditions, with an effect size of 0.9, a significance level of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a dropout rate of 10%. For the second experiment, the sample size was calculated to compare the intervention effect, with an effect size of 0.9, a significance level of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a dropout rate of 20%.

2.2. Design and Setting

Two experiments were conducted in this study. In the first experiment, ultrasonic equipment was used to measure the TrA thickness on the convex and concave sides of the lumbar curve of 11 IS patients for four conditions. The four conditions are abdominal muscle contraction (AMC) and non-AMC without 3DPC, and during AMC and non-AMC with 3DPC using CCs, while in the supine position. The Rigo classification method, which divides the scoliosis curves into Rigo type A, Rigo type B, Rigo type C, and Rigo Type E was used. Comparisons of TrA thickness symmetry between the experimental conditions were performed.
The posture of each patient was measured with the patient in the supine position with a 45° hip joint flexion and a 90° knee joint flexion while the feet were shoulder-width apart. The measurement was performed at the end of normal expiration during comfortable breathing, with the hands placed on the sides of the trunk. Prior to measurement, a pressure biofeedback unit (Stabilizer, Chattanooga Group Inc., Hixson, TN, USA) was used to maintain 40 mmHg while the TrA was contracted [37,38].
The four conditions (AMC/non-AMC without 3DPC and AMC/non-AMC with 3DPC) were randomly chosen during the measurements (Figure 1). Three measurements were taken for each condition, with three minutes of rest between them.
To measure the TrA thickness, the perpendicular distance of the TrA at a site 1.5 cm away from the muscle fascia junction was measured on captured images using Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) [17,19,39,40]. The TrA symmetry ratio was calculated as TrA thickness on the convex side of the lumbar curve/TrA thickness on the concave side of the lumbar curve (Figure 2).
In the second experiment, the Cobb angles, trunk rotation angles, and trunk expansion were measured using X-ray imaging to assess the effectiveness of 3DPC in maintaining TrA thickness symmetry based on the first experiment results (Figure 3). Thirty-seven IS patients attended a 3DPC exercise program consisting of warm-up, main, and cool-down exercises. One-hour sessions were held twice a week for four weeks in a rehabilitation center (Table 1).
In the warm-up exercise, self-correction was performed while keeping the pelvis stable through a pelvic correction after breathing education [41]. In the main exercise, load was gradually increased from the supine position to sitting and standing positions. A CC was used according to each curve pattern for 3D alignment in the supine position. The corrected posture was then maintained without CCs in sitting and standing positions, and a mirror was used for visual feedback. Self-elongation, deflection, and de-rotation were performed to align the lumbar curve with the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes, and then symmetric expansion was induced in the front and back, left and right, and up and down directions while focusing on the concave side of the curve through rotational angular breathing. The corrected posture was maintained as much as possible using isometric tension by slowly breathing during expiration from the expanded posture made through inspiration [29]. The cool-down exercise phase lasted 10 min, during which the self-corrected posture was maintained while performing a task-oriented exercise, such as a sit-to-stand exercise or walking and standing on an unstable floor. All procedures were conducted with the oversight of a specially trained physiotherapist.

2.3. Equipment and Data Collection

2.3.1. Ultrasound Device

To measure the TrA thickness, ultrasonic equipment (F31; Hitachi-Aloka Medical, Tokyo, Japan) with a 10 MHz linear probe was used in dual-scan mode. The probe was placed 2.5 cm in the anterior and medial directions from the midpoint between the 12th rib and the iliac crest in the transverse direction [42,43,44,45,46]. Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used for thickness measurements on captured images.

2.3.2. Cobb Angle

Cobb angles, which can objectively determine changes in the curvature of the spine, were measured using X-ray equipment (SIG-40-525; Ecoray Inc., Seoul, Korea). X-ray images were acquired at a medical institution in Busan, South Korea, while the patients were in a standing position. The patients were advised of necessary precautions during image acquisition. The Cobb angle between intersecting lines drawn perpendicular to the upper-end vertebral plate of the upper vertebra and the lower-end vertebral plate of the lower vertebra was measured [47,48,49,50,51].

2.3.3. Trunk Rotation Angle

A Bunnell scoliometer (Orthopedic Systems, Inc., Haywood, CA, USA) was used to measure the trunk rotation angle caused by scoliosis. Bonagamba et al. [52] reported high inter- and intra-rater reliability of the scoliosis goniometer. A forward bending test was performed with the patients putting their feet together, and the recessed area of the scoliometer was located in the spinous process. The steepest slope at the thoracic and lumbar blocks was then measured [53].

2.3.4. Trunk Expansion

For trunk expansion, the axilla, xiphoid process, and waist areas were measured [54,55]. The measurements were performed by placing a tape measure horizontally on the trunk. The average value of three measurements at the time of maximum inspiration was calculated. All measurements were performed by a single therapist with 10 years of clinical experience.

2.3.5. Corrective Cushion

A CC, which is a passive correction tool, was employed for 3DPC in the supine position. Each CC was wedge-shaped and 12 cm wide, 12 cm long, and 6 cm high. It was used to perform de-rotation, as it was positioned only on one side of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and pelvis. Its depth was adjusted by inserting it until the trunk was horizontal in relation to the floor surface by inducing vertebral de-rotation and deviation. Its surface was made of a non-slip material, and its hardness was maintained to achieve symmetric alignment of the trunk [56].

2.4. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the symmetry of TrA thickness on the convex and concave sides of the lumbar curve during AMC/non-AMC without 3DPC and the TrA symmetry on the convex and concave sides of the lumbar curve during AMC/non-AMC with 3DPC using a CC. In order to compare the differences in muscle thickness symmetry for AMC presence or absence and 3DPC presence or absence, a paired t-test was conducted separately for each group. Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,1) were calculated to assess the reliability of the measurement method. Multiple measurements were performed to test reliability. A paired t-test was conducted to examine whether there was a significant difference in symmetry between the pre- and post-intervention measures. As the xiphoid process and waist trunk expansion data were not normally distributed, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which is a nonparametric test, was used. The level of statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Institutional Review Board of Kyungsung University approved the study (KSU-19-12-001, 21 January 2020).

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of the Patients

Of the 11 participants in the first experiment, two were male and nine were female. The curve types were Rigo type A in 3 patients, Rigo type B in 5 patients, Rigo type C in 1 patient, and Rigo type E in 2 patients. The general characteristics of the participants in the first experiment are shown in Table 2.
Of the 37 participants in the second experiment, 6 were male and 31 were female. The curve types were Rigo type A in 13 patients, Rigo type B in 12 patients, Rigo type C in 5 patients, and Rigo type E in 7 patients. Risser signs were recorded as follows: Risser sign 3 was observed in 5 patients, Risser sign 4 in 10 patients, and Risser sign 5 in 22 patients. The general characteristics of the participants in the second experiment are shown in Table 3.

3.2. Reliability of the Measurement Method (TrA Thickness and Cobb Angle)

To analyze the reliability of the TrA thickness measurement method, the same ultrasound image was measured three times. The results showed that the reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.989. The intra-class coefficient (ICC 3,1) was 0.986 (95% CI 0.951–0.997), when three examiners measured the thickness of randomly selected TrA.
To analyze the reliability of the Cobb angle measurement method, the same X-ray image was measured three times. The results showed that the reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.988. The intra-class coefficient (ICC 3,1) was 0.979 (95% CI 0.911–0.997), when three examiners measured the Cobb angle of randomly selected X-ray images.

3.3. Comparison of TrA Thickness Symmetry Accoring to 3DPC and AMC (First Experiment)

TrA thickness symmetry significantly increased after 3DPC using CCs and after AMC. There was no statistically significant interaction between 3DPC and AMC (Table 4) (Figure 4). There was a significant difference in TrA thickness symmetry according to 3DPC using CCs between the AMC and non-AMC conditions. There was also a significant difference in TrA thickness symmetry according to AMC between 3DPC using CCs and no 3DPC.

3.4. Comparison of Parameters before and after the 3DPC Exercise Program (Second Experiment)

The Cobb angles and trunk rotation angles showed statistically significant decreases, while the trunk expansion showed a statistically significant increase after the four-week 3DPC exercise program (Table 5).

4. Discussion

This study conducted two experiments to evaluate the symmetry of TrA thickness in IS patients according to 3DPC and AMC, and the effectiveness of a 3DPC exercise program in maintaining symmetry. TrA symmetry is important to provide spinal stability to IS patients with TrA asymmetry and to prevent secondary imbalance. TrA is one of the deep muscles that provide spinal stability, and if TrA is asymmetric, it causes imbalance in the spine and trunk [57].
The first experiment was conducted to assess the symmetry of TrA thickness on the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curve according to 3DPC with CCs and AMC using ultrasound imaging. In IS patients, the TrA was most asymmetrical at rest, both 3DPC and AMC separately increased TrA symmetry, and the greatest symmetry was achieved when combining 3DPC and AMC.
Some previous studies utilized ultrasound to examine changes in patients with scoliosis in response to interventions. Linek et al. [16] found changes in abdominal muscle symmetry in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to posture, and Linek et al. [18] found that patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis displayed higher activity of the OE, OI, and TrA muscles on the right side during the active straight-leg raise. However, our study differs from previous studies in that we investigated the immediate effects of 3DPC using CC and AMC on TrA symmetry in patients with IS using ultrasound. Our results showed that the simultaneous application of 3DPC using CC and AMC immediately resulted in the greatest improvement in TrA symmetry on both the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curves in patients with IS.
The TrA is one of the deep trunk muscles, which plays an important role in lumbar stabilization as it is attached to the thoracolumbar fascia and is contracted first to provide spinal stability [57,58,59,60,61,62]. TrA thickness asymmetry may result in reduced balance, postural control ability, and stability during exercise and increased postural sway, all of which are observed in IS patients [18,63,64]. Kim et al. [19] verified the asymmetries in TrA thickness in IS patients and suggested a therapeutic method that could maintain trunk symmetry to have a normal operation of the TrA and prevent structural changes in the spine. A therapeutic method is important for preventing a vicious cycle of TrA thickness asymmetry and secondary asymmetries in IS patients [65].
In this study, there was a significant difference in the symmetry of TrA thickness on the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curve when 3DPC using CCs was applied, which was the first experimental condition. This was because vertebral deviation and de-rotation aligned the vertebrae in the frontal and horizontal planes as well as making structural symmetry of the TrA origin and insertion when performing 3DPC, thereby affecting the symmetry of TrA thickness on the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curve.
Braces and specially designed physiotherapy exercises are used as conservative treatments of scoliosis. Braces employ biomechanical factors, such as deviation, three-point pressure, and pairs of forces [33,34,66]. The CCs used in this study are considered to function as pads that provide pressure and force, which is the same in the production principle of braces. Zheng et al. [67] and Weinstein et al. [68] suggested that interventions using both braces and exercises could contribute to the improvement of scoliosis. However, despite the advantages of braces in improving spinal deformities and cosmetic aspects, exercise interventions are more beneficial from functional and psychological viewpoints, such as quality-of-life improvements. The use of braces may limit voluntary movement and cause psychological burdens due to aesthetic issues. The correction exercise method used in this study can overcome the limitations of braces and may result in voluntary changes in patients who can recognize symmetry.
AMC, which was the second experimental condition in this study, promoted the symmetry of TrA thickness on the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curve. The contraction of the TrA, which belongs to the antigravity muscles, resulted in greater symmetry in the standing position than in the supine position, indicating that the TrA, like other antigravity muscles, is contracted in a standing position to maintain posture [16]. Although this study used the supine position, which does not cause the TrA to contract, symmetry was achieved through active contraction of the TrA. This is because the TrA employs a symmetric contraction strategy by forming a musculofascial corset when it is contracted to prevent lumbar spine torsion and achieve trunk stabilization [14,16,69,70]. This symmetric contraction maintained the corrected posture through an active contraction in 3D self-correction, which is in line with the principles of conservative treatment methods for scoliosis. In particular, although there was no interaction between 3DPC and AMC in the first experiment when both conditions were applied at the same time, the TrA contracted most symmetrically on the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curve. This indicated that if the contraction of the TrA, which maintained symmetry only through the active contraction, occurred after adjusting the direction of vertebrae using CCs, the position and length of the TrA were maintained, promoting easy symmetrical contraction. This suggests that 3DPC and TrA contraction should be incorporated into exercise interventions for scoliosis.
The second experiment in this study verified the effectiveness of a four-week 3DPC exercise program in maintaining TrA thickness symmetry. A comparison of radiological findings before and after the intervention confirmed that the Cobb angles and trunk rotation angles decreased, while a comparison of clinical findings showed that trunk expansion increased. In this experiment, curve patterns were classified using the Rigo classification, thereby increasing the objectivity of the experimental design, a lack of which has been a limitation of previous studies on scoliosis. The patterns were divided into Rigo type A, Rigo type B, Rigo type C, and Rigo type E. Three-dimensional alignment using CCs was performed, and symmetry, which was important in the first experiment, was applied according to each curve pattern. The first experiment verified the TrA thickness symmetry in real-time, while the second experiment resulted in clinical and radiological changes through an exercise program aimed at maintaining TrA thickness symmetry. In other words, the symmetric contraction of the TrA had an impact on the clinical and radiological changes and was confirmed as an important factor for improving scoliosis. Although the patients who participated in the second experiment showed various levels of skeletal maturity, improvement was shown among the patients. Recent studies support the findings of this experiment, indicating that conservative treatment is effective even when bone maturity is reached [71,72].
This study has certain limitations. Due to the small number of participants, the results cannot be generalized, and differences in effects according to each curve pattern could not be distinguished. Although the subjects of the first and second experiments were recruited differently, it is necessary to recruit the same subjects in further studies. Further research is needed to confirm the effects of the combination of 3DPC and AMC on correcting spinal alignment through comparison with a control group. Various exercise programs that could be applied to scoliosis patients could be tested using 3DPC in various postures. Moreover, the intervention period could be longer, and a post-program evaluation could be conducted to assess the continuity of the intervention effects.

5. Conclusions

This study found that the application of 3DPC using CCs and AMC at the same time resulted in the greatest symmetry of TrA thickness on the concave and convex sides of the lumbar curves of IS patients. TrA symmetry is important to provide spinal stability and to prevent secondary imbalance for IS patients. Moreover, the four-week 3DPC exercise program aimed at maintaining this symmetry resulted in radiologically and clinically confirmed improvements. These results suggest that 3DPC and AMC should be used as key elements of conservative interventions for IS patients. The results can be used as the clinical foundation for future IS treatment directions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-Y.Y. and S.-Y.L.; methodology, S.-Y.Y.; software, S.-Y.Y.; validation, S.-Y.Y. and S.-Y.L.; formal analysis, S.-Y.Y. and S.-Y.L.; investigation, S.-Y.Y.; resources, S.-Y.Y. and S.-Y.L.; data curation, S.-Y.Y. and S.-Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.-Y.Y. and S.-Y.L.; visualization, S.-Y.Y.; supervision, S.-Y.L.; project administration, S.-Y.L.; funding acquisition, S.-Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Institutional Review Board of Kyungsung University approved the study (KSU-19-12-001, 21 January 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rigo, M.D.; Grivas, T.B. “Rehabilitation schools for scoliosis” thematic series: Describing the methods and results. Scoliosis 2010, 5, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Weinstein, S.L.; Dolan, L.A.; Cheng, J.C.; Danielsson, A.; Morcuende, J.A. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008, 371, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Negrini, S.; Donzelli, S.; Aulisa, A.G.; Czaprowski, D.; Schreiber, S.; De Mauroy, J.C.; Diers, H.; Grivas, T.B.; Knott, P.; Kotwicki, T.; et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Stokes, I. Hueter-Volkmann effect. In Etiology of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Current Trends and Relevance to New Treatment Approaches; Hanley & Belfus: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  5. Burwell, R.G. Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: Current concepts. Pediatr. Rehabil. 2003, 6, 137–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. MacLean, W.E., Jr.; Green, N.E.; Pierre, C.B.; Ray, D.C. Stress and coping with scoliosis: Psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1989, 9, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Freidel, K.; Petermann, F.; Reichel, D.; Steiner, A.; Warschburger, P.; Weiss, H.R. Quality of Life in Women with Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine 2002, 27, E87–E91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Reichel, D.; Schanz, J. Developmental psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment. Pediatr. Rehabil. 2003, 6, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Negrini, S.; Aulisa, A.G.; Aulisa, L.; Circo, A.B.; de Mauroy, J.C.; Durmala, J.; Grivas, T.B.; Knott, P.; Kotwicki, T.; Maruyama, T.; et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 2012, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Weinstein, S.L. The Natural History of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2019, 39, S44–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grivas, T.B.; Vasiliadis, E.; Mouzakis, V.; Mihas, C.; Koufopoulos, G. Association between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis prevalence and age at menarche in different geographic latitudes. Scoliosis 2006, 1, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Grivas, T.B.; Vasiliadis, E.S.; Mihas, C.; Savvidou, O. The effect of growth on the correlation between the spinal and rib cage deformity: Implications on idiopathic scoliosis pathogenesis. Scoliosis 2007, 2, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hresko, M.T. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, Y.; Shim, J.K.; Son, J.; Pyeon, H.Y.; Yoon, B. A neuromuscular strategy to prevent spinal torsion: Backward perturbation alters asymmetry of transversus abdominis muscle thickness into symmetry. Gait Posture 2013, 38, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Linek, P.; Wolny, T.; Saulicz, E.; Mysliwiec, A. Side differences of the lateral abdominal wall in supine rest position in mild adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis. Turk. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2017, 63, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Linek, P.; Saulicz, E.; Wolny, T.; Myśliwiec, A.; Gogola, A. Ultrasound evaluation of the symmetry of abdominal muscles in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015, 27, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hodges, P.; Pengel, L.; Herbert, R.; Gandevia, S. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle & Nerve Off. J. Am. Assoc. Electrodiagn. Med. 2003, 27, 682–692. [Google Scholar]
  18. Linek, P.; Saulicz, E.; Kuszewski, M.; Wolny, T. Ultrasound Assessment of the Abdominal Muscles at Rest and During the ASLR Test Among Adolescents with Scoliosis. Clin. Spine Surg. A Spine Publ. 2017, 30, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kim, D.-K.; Kim, C.-Y.; Lee, B.-K.; Seo, D. A comparison of ultrasonography measurement on the abdominal muscle thickness between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and healthy subjects. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 2018, 31, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Weiss, H.-R.; Bess, S.; Wong, M.S.; Patel, V.; Goodall, D.; Burger, E. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—To operate or not? A debate article. Patient Saf. Surg. 2008, 2, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Weiss, H.-R.; Goodall, D. The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2008, 44, 177. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bettany-Saltikov, J.; Parent, E.; Romano, M.; Villagrasa, M.; Negrini, S. Physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2014, 50, 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dolan, L.A.; Wright, J.; Weinstein, S.L. Correspondence: Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 680–681. [Google Scholar]
  24. Monticone, M.; Ambrosini, E.; Cazzaniga, D.; Rocca, B.; Ferrante, S. Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur. Spine J. 2014, 23, 1204–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yagci, G.; Yakut, Y. Core stabilization exercises versus scoliosis-specific exercises in moderate idiopathic scoliosis treatment. Prosthetics Orthot. Int. 2019, 43, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Negrini, S. Approach to scoliosis changed due to causes other than evidence: Patients call for conservative (rehabilitation) experts to join in team orthopedic surgeons. Disabil. Rehabil. 2008, 30, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Negrini, S.; Fusco, C.; Minozzi, S.; Atanasio, S.; Zaina, F.; Romano, M. Exercises reduce the progression rate of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Results of a comprehensive systematic review of the literature. Disabil. Rehabil. 2008, 30, 772–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Borysov, M.; Moramarco, M.; Sy, N.; Lee, S.G. Postural Re-Education of Scoliosis—State of the Art (Mini-review). Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 2016, 12, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Berdishevsky, H.; Lebel, V.A.; Bettany-Saltikov, J.; Rigo, M.; Lebel, A.; Hennes, A.; Romano, M.; Białek, M.; M’Hango, A.; Betts, T.; et al. Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises—A comprehensive review of seven major schools. Scoliosis 2016, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fusco, C.; Zaina, F.; Atanasio, S.; Romano, M.; Negrini, A.; Negrini, S. Physical exercises in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An updated systematic review. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2011, 27, 80–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. O’Brien, M.; Kuklo, T.; Blanke, K.; Lenke, L.; Group, S.D.S. Radiographic Measurement Manual; Medtronic Sofamor Danek Inc.: Memphis, TN, USA, 2004; pp. 47–108. [Google Scholar]
  32. Weiss, H.-R.; Negrini, S.; Hawes, M.C.; Rigo, M.; Kotwicki, T.; Grivas, T.B.; Maruyama, T.; Sosort, M.O.T. Physical exercises in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis at risk of brace treatment—SOSORT consensus paper 2005. Scoliosis 2006, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rigo, M.D.; Villagrasa, M.; Gallo, D. A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: Description and reliability. Scoliosis 2010, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rigo, M.; Jelačić, M. Brace technology thematic series: The 3D Rigo Chêneau-type brace. Scoliosis and spinal disorders. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017, 12, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sauvagnac, R.; Rigo, M. Evolution of Early Onset Scoliosis under Treatment with a 3D-Brace Concept. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Richardson, C.A.; Hodges, P.; Hides, J.A. Therapeutic Exercise for Lumbopelvic Stabilization: A Motor Control Approach for the Treatment and Prevention of Low Back Pain; Churchill Livingstone: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chattanooga, G. Stabilizer Pressure Bio-Feedback; Operating instructions; Chattanooga Group Inc.: Hixson, YN, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, N.-G.; Jung, J.-H.; You, J.-H.; Kang, S.-K.; Lee, D.-R.; Kwon, O.-Y.; Jeon, H.-S. Novel augmented ADIM training using ultrasound imaging and electromyography in adults with core instability. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 2011, 24, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, M.; Kim, Y.; Oh, S.; Suh, D.; Eun, S.-D.; Yoon, B. Abdominal hollowing and bracing strategies increase joint stability in the trunk region during sudden support surface translation but not in the lower extremities. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 2016, 29, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rigo, M.; Quera-Salvá, G.; Villagrasa, M.; Ferrer, M.; Casas, A.; Corbella, C.; Urrutia, A.; Martínez, S.; Puigdevall, N. Scoliosis intensive out-patient rehabilitation based on Schroth method. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2008, 135, 208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Mannion, A.F.; Pulkovski, N.; Gubler, D.; Gorelick, M.; O’Riordan, D.; Loupas, T.; Schenk, P.; Gerber, H.; Sprott, H. Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: An assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur. Spine J. 2008, 17, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Linek, P.; Saulicz, E.; Wolny, T.; Myśliwiec, A. Intra-rater Reliability of B-Mode Ultrasound Imaging of the Abdominal Muscles in Healthy Adolescents During the Active Straight Leg Raise Test. PM&R 2015, 7, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Linek, P.; Saulicz, E.; Wolny, T.; Myśliwiec, A. Reliability of B-Mode Sonography of the Abdominal Muscles in Healthy Adolescents in Different Body Positions. J. Ultrasound Med. 2014, 33, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Park, S.D. Reliability of Ultrasound Imaging of the Transversus Deep Abdominial, Internal Oblique and External Oblique Muscles of Patients with Low Back Pain Performing the Drawing in Maneuver. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2013, 25, 845–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Otani, Y.; Itotani, K.; Maeda, N.; Ikada, M.; Hatanaka, M.; Kato, J. Reliability of the Deep Abdominal Muscle Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonography in Normal Subjects. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2011, 23, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Cobb, J. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr. Course Lect. AAOS 1948, 5, 261–275. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ardran, G.M.; Coates, R.; Dickson, R.A.; Dixon-Brown, A.; Harding, F.M. Assessment of scoliosis in children: Low dose radiographic technique. Br. J. Radiol. 1980, 53, 146–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deacon, P.; Flood, B.; Dickson, R. Idiopathic scoliosis in three dimensions. A radiographic and morphometric analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1984, 66, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Vrtovec, T.; Pernuš, F.; Likar, B. A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur. Spine J. 2009, 18, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tanure, M.C.; Pinheiro, A.P.; Oliveira, A.S. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J. 2010, 10, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bonagamba, G.H.; Coelho, D.M.; De Oliveira, A.S. Inter and intra-rater reliability of the scoliometer. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2010, 14, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Bunnell, W.P. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1984, 66, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, J. Comparison of Effects of Ball Sling Exercise and Schroth Treatments in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis. Master’s thesis, The Graduate School of Sports Science, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  55. Shim, J.-H.; Oh, D.-W.; Lee, G.-W. The effects of thoracic flexibility exercise on vital capacity and chest expansion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Phys. Ther. Korea 2002, 9, 145–156. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lehnert-Schroth, C. Dreidimensionale Skoliosebehandlung: Atmungs-Orthopädie System Schroth; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ferreira, P.; Ferreira, M.L.; Maher, C.; Refshauge, K.; Herbert, R.; Hodges, P. Changes in recruitment of transversus abdominis correlate with disability in people with chronic low back pain. Br. J. Sports Med. 2010, 44, 1166–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tesh, K.M.; Dunn, J.S.; Evans, J.H. The Abdominal Muscles and Vertebral Stability. Spine 1987, 12, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. O’Sullivan, P.B.; Phyty, G.D.M.; Twomey, L.T.; Allison, G.T. Evaluation of Specific Stabilizing Exercise in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain with Radiologic Diagnosis of Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis. Spine 1997, 22, 2959–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lam, K.; Mehdian, H. The importance of an intact abdominal musculature mechanism in maintaining spinal sagittal balance: Case illustration in prune-belly syndrome. Spine 1999, 24, 719–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hodges, P.W. Is there a role for transversus abdominis in lumbo-pelvic stability? Man. Ther. 1999, 4, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Akuthota, V.; Nadler, S.F. Core strengthening. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004, 85, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kanehisa, H.; Ikegawa, S.; Fukunaga, T. Comparison of muscle cross-sectional area and strength between untrained women and men. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 1994, 68, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chan, Y.-L.; Cheng, J.C.Y.; Guo, X.; King, A.D.; Griffith, J.F.; Metreweli, C. MRI evaluation of multifidus muscles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr. Radiol. 1999, 29, 360–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Stokes, I.A.F.; Burwell, R.G.; Dangerfield, P.H. Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis—A test of the ‘vicious cycle’ pathogenetic hypothesis: Summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Scoliosis 2006, 1, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wood, G.I.; Rigo, M. The Principles and Biomechanics of the Rigo Chêneau Type Brace. Innov. Spinal Deform. Postural Disord. 2017, 169, 70381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Zheng, Y.; Dang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Lou, E.H.; He, C.; Wong, M. Whether Orthotic Management and Exercise are Equally Effective to the Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Mainland China? Spine 2018, 43, E494–E503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Weinstein, S.L.; Dolan, L.A.; Wright, J.G.; Dobbs, M.B. Effects of Bracing in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 1512–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hides, J.; Wilson, S.; Stanton, W.; McMahon, S.; Keto, H.; McMahon, K.; Bryant, M.; Richardson, C. An MRI Investigation Into the Function of the Transversus Abdominis Muscle During “Drawing-In” of the Abdominal Wall. Spine 2006, 31, E175–E178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Springer, B.A.; Gill, N.W. Characterization of Lateral Abdominal Muscle Thickness in Persons with Lower Extremity Amputations. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2007, 37, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Bridwell, K.H.; Glassman, S.; Horton, W.; Shaffrey, C.; Schwab, F.; Zebala, L.P.; Lenke, L.G.; Hilton, J.F.; Shainline, M.; Baldus, C. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: A prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine 2009, 34, 2171–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sbihli, A.; Tudini, F.; Chui, K. Adult patient perceptions on the effectiveness of scoliosis specific exercises. In Research into Spinal Deformities 9; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 199–203. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 20 05016 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram of the design of the first experiment.
Figure 1. Diagram of the design of the first experiment.
Ijerph 20 05016 g001
Ijerph 20 05016 g002 550
Figure 2. Ultrasound imaging measurement.
Figure 2. Ultrasound imaging measurement.
Ijerph 20 05016 g002
Ijerph 20 05016 g003 550
Figure 3. Diagram of the design of the second experiment.
Figure 3. Diagram of the design of the second experiment.
Ijerph 20 05016 g003
Ijerph 20 05016 g004 550
Figure 4. Results of an ultrasound imaging measurement. The symmetry ratio was calculated as the transversus abdominis thickness on the convex side of the lumbar curve divided by the thickness on the concave side. EO: external oblique; IO: internal oblique; TrA: transversus abdominis. (a) No correction and no contraction; (b) no correction and contraction; (c) correction and no contraction; and (d) correction and contraction.
Figure 4. Results of an ultrasound imaging measurement. The symmetry ratio was calculated as the transversus abdominis thickness on the convex side of the lumbar curve divided by the thickness on the concave side. EO: external oblique; IO: internal oblique; TrA: transversus abdominis. (a) No correction and no contraction; (b) no correction and contraction; (c) correction and no contraction; and (d) correction and contraction.
Ijerph 20 05016 g004
Table
Table 1. General characteristics of the participants in the second experiment (n = 37).
Table 1. General characteristics of the participants in the second experiment (n = 37).
ExerciseExercise ProgramFrequency
Warm-up
(10 min)
  • Static stretching
  • Breathing
  • Pelvic self-corrections
10 s, 5 repetitions, 3 sets
Main exercise
(40 min)
  • Semi-hanging
  • Supine
  • Sitting in a chair
  • Standing
10 s, 10 repetitions, 3 sets
Cool-down
(10 min)
  • Sit-to-stand
  • Standing on an unstable floor
  • Walking
30 s, 5 repetitions, 3 sets
Table
Table 2. General characteristics of the participants in the first experiment (n = 11).
Table 2. General characteristics of the participants in the first experiment (n = 11).
VariableMean ± SD (Min–Max)
Age (years)22.6 ± 4.4 (15–31)
Height (cm)163.9 ± 6.4 (155–173)
Weight (kg)55.2 ± 9.9 (39–74)
BMI (kg/m2)20.4 ± 2.3 (15.43–24.73)
Cobb angle (°)Thoracic30.6 ± 12.1 (12–49)
Lumbar26.6 ± 10.7 (11–51)
Trunk rotation angle (°)Thoracic7.5 ± 3.7 (2–13)
Lumbar6.5 ± 3.7 (1–12)
All values are means ± standard deviations. BMI: body mass index.
Table
Table 3. General characteristics of the participants in the second experiment (n = 37).
Table 3. General characteristics of the participants in the second experiment (n = 37).
VariableMean ± SD (Min-Max)
Age (years)22.0 ± 6.6 (13–36)
Height (cm)164.8 ± 6.5 (150–179)
Weight (kg)51.1 ± 8.4 (33–80)
BMI (kg/m2)19.1 ± 2.2 (14.67–25.32)
Cobb angle (°)Thoracic33.3 ± 12.2 (12–56)
Lumbar28.3 ± 11.0 (10–63)
Trunk rotation angle (°)Thoracic8.0 ± 4.2 (1–18)
Lumbar6.8 ± 4.2 (1–17)
Trunk expansion at rest (cm)Axilla79.0 ± 5.7 (68–94.5)
Xiphoid process69.8 ± 6.6 (61–91)
Waist65.5 ± 6.2 (56–82.5)
All values are means ± standard deviations. BMI: body mass index.
Table
Table 4. Two-way ANOVA results of the interaction effects between 3D postural correction and abdominal muscle contraction (n = 11).
Table 4. Two-way ANOVA results of the interaction effects between 3D postural correction and abdominal muscle contraction (n = 11).
No ContractionContractionp
No correction1.42 ± 0.201.24 ± 0.12<0.01 *
3D correction1.30 ± 0.151.12 ± 0.09<0.01 *
p<0.01 *<0.01 *
All values (except p-values) are means ± standard deviations. * Significant at the 5% level. Transverse abdominis symmetry ratio: the closer the quotient to 1, the greater the TrA thickness symmetry.
Table
Table 5. Comparison of parameters before and after the 3DPC exercise program (n = 37).
Table 5. Comparison of parameters before and after the 3DPC exercise program (n = 37).
ParameterBeforeAfterp
Cobb angle (°)Thoracic33.3 ± 12.428.3 ± 11.1<0.01 *
Lumbar28.3 ± 11.224.1 ± 9.9<0.01 *
Trunk rotation angle (°)Thoracic8.0 ± 4.34.7 ± 3.3<0.01 *
Lumbar6.8 ± 4.33.2 ± 2.8<0.01 *
Trunk expansion (cm)Axilla82.7 ± 6.183.2 ± 5.9<0.01 *
Xiphoid process74.4 ± 6.575.2 ± 6.5<0.01 *
Waist66.5 ± 6.068.3 ± 5.9<0.01 *
All values (except p-values) are means ± standard deviations. * Significant at the 5% level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoon, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y. Effects of 3D Postural Correction and Abdominal Muscle Contraction on the Symmetry of the Transverse Abdominis and Spinal Alignment in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065016

AMA Style

Yoon S-Y, Lee S-Y. Effects of 3D Postural Correction and Abdominal Muscle Contraction on the Symmetry of the Transverse Abdominis and Spinal Alignment in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(6):5016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoon, Sung-Young, and Sang-Yeol Lee. 2023. "Effects of 3D Postural Correction and Abdominal Muscle Contraction on the Symmetry of the Transverse Abdominis and Spinal Alignment in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 6: 5016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop