Next Article in Journal
International Comparison of Social Support Policies on Long-Term Care in Workplaces in Aging Societies
Previous Article in Journal
One-Year Prevalence of Perceived Medical Errors or Near Misses and Its Association with Depressive Symptoms among Chinese Medical Professionals: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Physical Exercise and Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Korean Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes

1
Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
2
Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
3
Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(6), 3280; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063280
Submission received: 10 February 2022 / Revised: 6 March 2022 / Accepted: 8 March 2022 / Published: 10 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Exercise and Health)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to identify the association between physical exercise and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in Korean patients diagnosed with diabetes. Data from the 2015–2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used. In total, 2559 participants were included (1286 males and 1273 females). Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the effect of physical exercise on controlled HbA1c levels among diabetic patients. In Korean male patients with diabetes, performance of physical exercise, including walking and resistance exercises, was associated with controlled HbA1c levels < 6.5% (odds ratio (OR), 1.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.92). In males, performing resistance exercise for ≥5 days a week, without walking exercise, had a significant association with HbA1c levels (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.15–2.65). HbA1c levels were more likely to be controlled when both walking and resistance exercises were performed for ≥5 days a week in both sexes (males: OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04–2.93 and females: OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.09–6.15). This study found that resistance exercise may contribute to the management of HbA1c levels among Korean patients with diabetes. Promoting resistance exercise performance can be beneficial for improving the condition of patients with diabetes.

1. Introduction

Since the prevalence of diabetes keeps increasing worldwide and related chronic complications cause higher health costs, primary prevention and management from the pre-diabetes stage are necessary [1,2]. Currently, diabetes is prevalent in one out of seven Korean adults aged > 30 years and it has been reported to be the sixth leading cause of death in South Korea [3]. Moreover, among Korean patients, 53.2% have been reported to be obese, with 61.3% and 72% of those with hypertension and hyperlipidemia, respectively. However, one-third of them were unaware of their diabetes status and <30% were being properly managed [4]. Early detection and management of diabetes and related complications have become major health policy issues that should be resolved at regional and national levels. As part of the policy, the Committee of Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Korean Diabetes Association has regularly published and updated the guidelines for Korean patients with diabetes [5].
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a criterion for diagnosing diabetes along with fasting blood sugar, and good glycemic control is essential in preventing diabetic complications [6]. In general, diabetes is a progressive disease, which is not easy to improve or cure once diagnosed. Thus, control of blood glucose and HbA1c has to be achieved through lifestyle modifications, including diet and exercise, in addition to medication and insulin injection [7]. As a daily effort, it is recommended that patients with diabetes perform ≥ 150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per week and at least two sessions of resistance exercise per week [5,8].
Exercise training is an established part of the treatment in diabetes, and a number of preceding clinical trials have demonstrated that structured exercise training improves glycemic control and cardiovascular disease risk factors [9,10]. Several exercise trials have showed an overall reduction in HbA1c of 0.8% [11]. Some meta-analyses [12,13,14] also reported that structured exercise training has effects on glucose control and risk factors for complications. It has further been identified that combined aerobic and resistance exercise may improve the control of HbA1c more efficiently than aerobic or resistance exercise alone [15].
In this background, this study aimed to identify the association between physical exercise and HbA1c levels in Korean patients diagnosed with diabetes, and provides specific information on the type and duration of exercise required for controlling HbA1c levels. Furthermore, it aimed to provide health policy implications by examining whether diabetes can be improved if carefully managed through lifestyle modifications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data

The data used in this study were obtained from the 2015–2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), a cross-sectional and nationwide survey conducted by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. The KNHANES was designed to evaluate the health status, health behavior, and nutritional status of the South Korean population to provide basic data for developing nationwide health policies [16,17].
Informed consent was obtained from all respondents in advance and all data analyzed in this study were fully anonymized. As the KNHANES complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and provides publicly accessible data, further ethical approval for the use of these data was not required [17,18].

2.2. Study Population

The total survey population from the recent five years (2015–2019) included 39,759 individuals. The inclusion criteria were as follows: those with self-reported diabetes diagnosed by doctors (questionnaire item: “Have you been diagnosed with diabetes?” and further questions about treatment history) and those aged >19 years. After excluding those with missing data (N = 367), data from 2559 participants (1286 males; 1273 females) were analyzed for this study.

2.3. Variables

The dependent variable was the percent HbA1c, the optimal standard for monitoring glycemic control that could serve as an indicator of diabetes [19]. Diabetes was diagnosed when the HbA1c level was found to be ≥6.5% in a blood test. The main independent variable was physical exercise performance, which was subdivided into three groups: (1) people who performed only walking exercise; (2) people who performed only resistance exercise; and (3) people who performed both walking and resistance exercise. This variable was derived from questionnaires asking how many days each of walking and resistance exercise during the past week (0 to 7 days), and how long did your usually exercises at one time. According to the guidelines of the KNHANES, the rate of performing walking exercise was defined as the percentage of people who performed walking exercise for >30 min at a time, >5 days a week in the last week, and the rate of performing resistance exercise was defined as the percentage of people who practiced exercises, such as push-ups, sit-ups, dumbbells, barbells, and iron bars for >2 days in the last week.
The covariates included demographic factors (sex, age, marital status, and educational level), socioeconomic factors (income, occupation, and region), health-status related factors (body mass index [BMI] and the presence of other chronic diseases), and health behavioral patterns (drinking, smoking, and management of blood glucose). To control for the severity of diabetes, we adjusted the variables related to the management of blood glucose, which were subdivided into the following five categories: (1) those who received non-medication treatment; (2) those who received only oral medication; (3) those who received only insulin injection; (4) those who received both medication and insulin injection; and (5) those who did not manage their blood glucose at all. Those receiving both medication and insulin injection were considered as patients with the most severe diabetes.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A descriptive analysis was performed to investigate the distribution of the general characteristics of the study population. Thereafter, multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the effect of physical exercise on HbA1c levels among patients with diabetes and to perform subgroup analyses stratified by sex, type of physical exercise, and HbA1c levels. The key results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For all analyses, we used SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc; Cary, NC, USA) and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Table 1 presents the results of univariate analyses, which examined the association between physical exercise and HbA1c levels with each variable stratified by sex. Of the total 2559 participants, 1286 were male and 1273 were female. Participants who self-reported that they had performed at least one day of walking and resistance exercises in the last week included 47.7% of males (N = 614) and 38.6% of females (N = 492). It was found that most participants had performed only walking exercise and the number of females that practiced resistance exercise was significantly lower than males.
Table 2 demonstrates the associations between physical exercise and other covariates and controlled HbA1c levels. Males who practiced both walking and resistance exercises in the past week were more likely to maintain HbA1c levels < 6.5% (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.17–2.92). When walking and resistance exercises were combined, the ORs increased for both males and females, although not statistically significant.
We also performed subgroup analysis to assess the combined effects of physical exercise and other covariates on HbA1c levels, as shown in Table 3. It was found that when patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) performed both walking and resistance exercises, there was a significant lowering effect on the HbA1c levels (males: OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.06–4.25 and females: OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.15–7.27). In addition, males who drank frequently had a higher OR (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.29–4.19).
Additional subgroup analysis was conducted to examine how the ORs changed according to the type and duration of exercise, that is, to investigate what kind of exercise and how long it needs to be performed to get a positive effect on diabetes. Duration of exercise performed in the last week was divided into four categories: never, 1–2 days a week, 3–4 days a week, and >5 days a week. As shown in Figure 1, for males, the ORs showed a tendency to increase linearly as the duration of resistance exercise increased. When the male participants performed exercise for >5 days a week, they were more likely to maintain HbA1c levels <6.5%, compared with those who did not perform resistance exercise (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.15–2.65). Further, controlled HbA1c levels were associated with a combination of walking and resistance exercises for ≥5 days a week in both sexes (males: OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04–2.93 and females: OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.09–6.15). This duration of exercise exceeds the global recommendations.

4. Discussion

Physical inactivity, obesity, and sedentary lifestyle are well-known important factors influencing the increasing incidence of diabetes worldwide [20,21]. It has also been found that regular exercise performance has a significant effect on nutrient metabolism. In particular, it helps to reduce blood glucose levels, improve glycemic control, and plays a role in weight loss [22,23]. In addition, weight and visceral fat loss, through exercise, may lead to improvement in metabolic indices and reduction in insulin resistance [24]. Consequently, for patients with pre-diabetes, performing exercise regularly may prevent the development of diabetes.
Based on this mechanism, our aim in the present study was to investigate the association between physical exercise and controlled HbA1c levels among Korean patients with diabetes. We found that a combination of physical and resistance exercises may contribute to the reduction of HbA1c levels and improve the condition of Korean male patients. Diabetes, a progressive and chronic disease, is difficult to improve or cure once diagnosed. However, our findings have suggested the possibility of improving glycemic control by performing physical exercise, especially resistance exercise. In other words, proper management through regular exercise, including resistance exercise, may be necessary from the early stage to prevent the condition from worsening.
Statistically significant results were observed only for males, but higher ORs were observed for both males and females when exercises, including resistance exercises, were practiced. Additionally, even if walking exercise was performed for >150 min a week (or >5 days a week for 30 min at a time), based on the global guidelines, without resistance exercise, no significant association was observed. On the other hand, if males performed only resistance exercise for ≥5 days a week, it was effective in managing their HbA1c levels, without walking exercise. Therefore, we suggest that performing resistance exercise is important and beneficial for improving the condition of patients with diabetes.
Additional subgroup analyses of the type and duration of exercise confirmed that there was a significant association in both sex groups when they performed exercise at higher levels than that officially recommended. Considering that the rate of exercise performance rarely increases due to changes in lifestyle, it is necessary to adjust the recommended exercise level for patients with diabetes, using both official national and regional guidelines. Additionally, considering that more than half of Korean patients with diabetes do not perform exercise, it is necessary to develop a program that allows easy access to exercise in daily life.
Previous studies with a similar purpose to that of our study have shown that walking exercise duration of >150 min per week was associated with a reduction in HbA1c levels [7,14,25]. As in this study, the effect on controlling HbA1c was evaluated by dividing walking and resistance exercise, and it was demonstrated that a combination of walking and resistance exercise was more effective [15,22]. However, in the present study, statistical significance was found only in combined exercises and only among males; ORs were slightly increased in females as well. Therefore, we pointed out that the number of participants who performed exercise was too small. Despite the data being used in the last 5 years, among all female patients with diabetes, the rate of exercise performance, including resistance training, was only 8.09%. Therefore, given the observational nature of this study, the low rate of physical exercise performance among females, including the imprecise 95% CIs for some point estimates, the results of this study should be interpreted cautiously.
This study had certain limitations. First, because this was a cross-sectional survey, the association between variables could be confirmed, but causality could not be determined. Second, the data were based on self-reporting; hence, the actual level and duration of exercise reported may not have been accurately measured and may not be reliable. In order to provide a more reliable exercise therapy for HbA1c control in diabetic patients, future research should be conducted using wearable technology-equipped devices. Further, although we tried to adjust for numerous covariates that may affect the dependent variable, residual confounding effects from unmeasured variables could not be ruled out. For example, it is known that diet is as important as exercise in diabetes management [23], but there were no reliable diet-related variables from the extracted data, so it could not be corrected.
In Korea, only a few studies used recent data to determine this association. Findings derived from using past data might reflect a considerable level of discrepancy with the current lifestyle [26,27,28,29,30], and these studies did not provide patients with specific information on how to practice physical exercise. Therefore, our study is meaningful in that it reflected the current lifestyle patterns of Korean patients with diabetes, using the most recent and nationally representative data. Further, this study suggested that more intense exercise than that of the global recommendations should be implemented in intervention.

5. Conclusions

This study found that regular physical exercise was associated with controlled HbA1c levels among Korean patients with diabetes. Particularly, practicing resistance exercise may contribute more to the management of their HbA1c levels than walking exercise. Promoting resistance exercise performance can be beneficial for improving the condition of patients with diabetes.

Author Contributions

I.Y. made a substantial contribution to the concept or design of the work; I.Y. and H.J.J. contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; I.Y., Y.S.P. and E.-C.P. drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

As the KNHANES complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and provides publicly accessible data, further ethical approval for the use of these data was not required.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset analyzed in the present study is publicly accessible. Available online: https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr (accessed on 3 February 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaiser, A.B.; Zhang, N.; Van Der Pluijm, W. Global prevalence of type 2 diabetes over the next ten years (2018–2028). Diabetes 2018, 67, 202-LB. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Williams, R.; Van Gaal, L.; Lucioni, C. Assessing the impact of complications on the costs of Type II diabetes. Diabetologia 2002, 45, S13–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. KOSIS. Cause of Death Statistics in the Republic Korea, 2019; Statistics Korea: Daejeon, Korea, 2021.
  4. Jung, C.-H.; Son, J.W.; Kang, S.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, H.S.; Seo, M.; Shin, H.-J.; Lee, S.-S.; Jeong, S.J. Diabetes Fact Sheets in Korea, 2020: An Appraisal of Current Status. Diabetes Metab. J. 2021, 45, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hur, K.Y.; Moon, M.K.; Park, J.S.; Kim, S.-K.; Lee, S.-H.; Yun, J.-S.; Baek, J.H.; Noh, J.; Lee, B.-W.; Oh, T.J. 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus in Korea. Diabetes Metab. J. 2021, 45, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lind, M.; Odén, A.; Fahlén, M.; Eliasson, B. The true value of HbA1c as a predictor of diabetic complications: Simulations of HbA1c variables. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanz, C.; Gautier, J.-F.; Hanaire, H. Physical exercise for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2010, 36, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sigal, R.J.; Kenny, G.P.; Boulé, N.G.; Wells, G.A.; Prud’homme, D.; Fortier, M.; Reid, R.D.; Tulloch, H.; Coyle, D.; Phillips, P. Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007, 147, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Byrkjeland, R.; Njerve, I.U.; Anderssen, S.; Arnesen, H.; Seljeflot, I.; Solheim, S. Effects of exercise training on HbA1c and VO2peak in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: A randomised clinical trial. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2015, 12, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Larose, J. The Effect of Exercise Training on Physical Fitness in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; University of Ottawa: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marwick, T.H.; Hordern, M.D.; Miller, T.; Chyun, D.A.; Bertoni, A.G.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Philippides, G.; Rocchini, A. Exercise training for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Impact on cardiovascular risk: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009, 119, 3244–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Snowling, N.J.; Hopkins, W.G. Effects of different modes of exercise training on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 2518–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Boulé, N.G.; Haddad, E.; Kenny, G.P.; Wells, G.A.; Sigal, R.J. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001, 286, 1218–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Umpierre, D.; Ribeiro, P.A.B.; Kramer, C.K.; Leitão, C.B.; Zucatti, A.T.N.; Azevedo, M.J.; Gross, J.L.; Ribeiro, J.P.; Schaan, B.D. Physical Activity Advice Only or Structured Exercise Training and Association With HbA1c Levels in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2011, 305, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Church, T.S.; Blair, S.N.; Cocreham, S.; Johannsen, N.; Johnson, W.; Kramer, K.; Mikus, C.R.; Myers, V.; Nauta, M.; Rodarte, R.Q. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010, 304, 2253–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Choi, D.-W.; Jeon, J.; Lee, S.A.; Han, K.-T.; Park, E.-C.; Jang, S.-I. Association between smoking behavior patterns and glycated hemoglobin levels in a general population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kim, H.; Jeong, W.; Kwon, J.; Kim, Y.; Jang, S.-I.; Park, E.-C. Sex differences in type of exercise associated with depression in South Korean adults. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, E.Y.; Shim, Y.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, S.P.; Ko, K.D.; Choi, W.-J. Adherence to general medical checkup and cancer screening guidelines according to self-reported smoking status: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010–2012. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Abbas, Y. Glycosylated Hemoglobin: The importance in management of type 2 diabetes. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 7, 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  20. Praet, S.F.; van Loon, L.J. Optimizing the therapeutic benefits of exercise in Type. Exp. Physiol. 2009, 94, 684–694. [Google Scholar]
  21. Najafipour, F.; Mobasseri, M.; Yavari, A.; Nadrian, H.; Aliasgarzadeh, A.; Abbasi, N.M.; Niafar, M.; Gharamaleki, J.H.; Sadra, V. Effect of regular exercise training on changes in HbA1c, BMI and VO2max among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An 8-year trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2017, 5, e000414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yavari, A.; Najafipoor, F.; Aliasgarzadeh, A.; Niafar, M.; Mobasseri, M. Effect of aerobic exercise, resistance training or combined training on glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Biol. Sport 2012, 29, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Asif, M. The prevention and control the type-2 diabetes by changing lifestyle and dietary pattern. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2014, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Albright, A.; Franz, M.; Hornsby, G.; Kriska, A.; Marrero, D.; Ullrich, I.; Verity, L.S. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and type 2 diabetes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000, 32, 1345–1360. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Harris-Hayes, M.; Schootman, M.; Schootman, J.C.; Hastings, M.K. The role of physical therapists in fighting the type 2 diabetes epidemic. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2020, 50, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Park, J.-H.; Lee, Y.-E. Effects of exercise on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus in Koreans: The fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V). J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015, 27, 3559–3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yoo, J.S.; Hwang, A.R.; Lee, H.C.; Kim, C.J. Development and validation of a computerized exercise intervention program for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korea. Yonsei Med. J. 2003, 44, 892–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lee, D.-C.; Park, I.; Jun, T.-W.; Nam, B.-H.; Cho, S.-i.; Blair, S.N.; Kim, Y.-S. Physical activity and body mass index and their associations with the development of type 2 diabetes in Korean men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 176, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kim, D.J. The epidemiology of diabetes in Korea. Diabetes Metab. J. 2011, 35, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Min, K.W.; An, K.H.; Sohn, T.S.; Park, Y.M.; Hong, Y.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, Y.B.; Park, K.S.; Lee, G.W.; Kim, I.J. The study of physical activity in the Korean with type 2 diabetes. J. Korean Diabetes Assoc. 2005, 29, 517–525. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Results of subgroup analysis stratified by the type and duration of physical exercise. Abbreviations: HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 1. Results of subgroup analysis stratified by the type and duration of physical exercise. Abbreviations: HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Ijerph 19 03280 g001
Table 1. General characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. General characteristics of the study population.
VariablesMaleFemale
HbA1c LevelHbA1c Level
TOTAL≥6.5%<6.5%p-ValueTOTAL≥6.5%<6.5%p-Value
N%N%N%N%N%N%
Total (N = 2559)1286100.091070.837629.2 1273100.091271.636128.4
Physical exercise 0.109 0.619
Yes614 47.7 426 69.4 188 30.6 492 38.6 357 72.6 135 27.4
Only walking exercise302 23.5 220 72.8 82 27.2 389 30.6 287 73.8 102 26.2
Only resistance exercise150 11.7 104 69.3 46 30.7 49 3.8 34 69.4 15 30.6
Both162 12.6 102 63.0 60 37.0 54 4.2 36 66.7 18 33.3
No672 52.3 484 72.0 188 28.0 781 61.4 555 71.1 226 28.9
Age <0.001 0.125
19~3924 1.9 17 70.8 7 29.2 22 1.7 13 59.1 9 40.9
40~49114 8.9 94 82.5 20 17.5 72 5.7 58 80.6 14 19.4
50~59258 20.1 200 77.5 58 22.5 207 16.3 154 74.4 53 25.6
over 60890 69.2 599 67.3 291 32.7 972 76.4 687 70.7 285 29.3
Marital status 0.330 0.546
Married or Cohabiting 1095 85.1 781 71.3 314 28.7 731 57.4 529 72.4 202 27.6
Else191 14.9 129 67.5 62 32.5 524 41.2 383 73.1 159 30.3
Educational level 0.220 0.506
High284 22.1 207 72.9 77 27.1 89 7.0 61 68.5 28 31.5
Middle421 32.7 306 72.7 115 27.3 249 19.6 185 74.3 64 25.7
Low581 45.2 397 68.3 184 31.7 935 73.4 666 71.2 269 28.8
Income 0.003 0.405
High277 21.5 216 78.0 61 22.0 163 12.8 123 75.5 40 24.5
Middle621 48.3 439 70.7 182 29.3 571 44.9 411 72.0 160 28.0
Low388 30.2 255 65.7 133 34.3 539 42.3 378 70.1 161 29.9
Occupation 0.025 0.114
White-collar208 16.2 155 74.5 53 25.5 60 4.7 45 75.0 15 25.0
Pink-collar89 6.9 68 76.4 21 23.6 14411.3 110 76.434 23.6
Blue-collar472 36.7 345 73.1 127 26.9 228 17.9 173 75.9 55 24.1
Housewife or Inoccupation517 40.2 342 66.2 175 33.8 841 66.1 584 69.4 257 30.6
Region 0.120 0.911
Metropolitan city639 49.7 439 68.7 200 31.3 615 48.3 442 71.9 173 28.1
Rural647 50.3 471 72.8 176 27.2 658 51.7 470 71.4 188 28.6
BMI 0.258 0.351
Obesity597 46.4 426 71.4 171 28.6 629 49.4 462 73.4 167 26.6
Normal672 52.3 475 70.7 197 29.3 626 49.2 438 70.0 188 30.0
Low weight17 1.3 9 52.9 8 47.1 18 1.4 12 66.7 6 33.3
Drinking 0.412 0.451
Frequently726 56.5 503 69.3 223 30.7 184 14.5 129 70.1 55 29.9
Occasionally214 16.6 155 72.4 59 27.6 338 26.6 251 74.3 87 25.7
None346 26.9 252 72.8 94 27.2 751 59.0 532 70.8 219 29.2
Smoking 0.053 0.317
Current smoker374 29.1 282 75.4 92 24.6 52 4.1 36 69.2 16 30.8
Ex-smoker695 54.0 475 68.3 220 31.7 56 4.4 45 80.4 11 19.6
None217 16.9 153 70.5 64 29.5 1165 91.5 831 71.3 334 28.7
Management of Blood Glucose <0.001 <.0001
Non-medication133 10.3 95 71.4 38 28.6 128 10.1 99 77.3 29 22.7
Only medication987 76.7 695 70.4 292 29.6 985 77.4 702 71.3 283 28.7
Only insulin11 0.9 9 81.8 2 18.2 16 1.3 15 93.8 1 6.3
Both medication and insulin63 4.9 57 90.5 6 9.5 73 5.7 67 91.8 6 8.2
None92 7.2 54 58.7 38 41.3 71 5.6 29 40.8 42 59.2
Chronic Disease 0.131 0.048
Only hypertension404 31.4 269 66.6 135 33.4 324 25.5 218 67.3 106 32.7
Only hyperlipidemia155 12.1 114 73.5 41 26.5 228 17.9 162 71.1 66 28.9
Both390 30.3 278 71.3 112 28.7 524 41.2 377 71.9 147 28.1
None337 26.2 249 73.9 88 26.1 197 15.5 155 78.7 42 21.3
Year 0.015 0.596
2015214 16.6 66 30.8 148 69.2 197 15.5 51 25.9 146 74.1
2016263 20.5 85 32.3 178 67.7 285 22.4 89 31.2 196 68.8
2017261 20.3 87 33.3 174 66.7 261 20.5 77 29.5 184 70.5
2018267 20.8 56 21.0 211 79.0 260 20.4 67 25.8 193 74.2
2019281 21.9 82 29.2 199 70.8 270 21.2 77 28.5 193 71.5
BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.
Table 2. Results of multiple regression analysis to investigate the association between physical exercise and HbA1c levels.
Table 2. Results of multiple regression analysis to investigate the association between physical exercise and HbA1c levels.
VariablesMaleFemale
HbA1c Level < 6.5%HbA1c Level < 6.5%
OR95% CIOR95% CI
Physical exercise        
only walking exercise0.87 (0.60–1.26)0.91 (0.65–1.26)
only resistance exercise1.20 (0.74–1.95)1.01 (0.47–2.15)
Both1.85 (1.17–2.92)1.08 (0.54–2.17)
None1.00 1.00
Age
19~391.00 1.00
40~490.35 (0.11–1.17)0.27 (0.09–0.82)
50~590.66 (0.22–2.04)0.70 (0.25–1.95)
over 600.81 (0.27–2.44)0.60 (0.21–1.68)
Marital status
Married or Cohabiting 1.12 (0.74–1.71)1.13 (0.82–1.54)
Else1.00 1.00
Educational level
High1.03 (0.64–1.67)1.58 (0.83–2.99)
Middle0.84 (0.59–1.20)0.89 (0.56–1.42)
Low1.00 1.00
Income
High0.44 (0.27–0.72)0.68 (0.40–1.16)
Middle0.65 (0.45–0.94)0.81 (0.57–1.14)
Low1.00 1.00
Occupation
White-collar1.00 1.00
Pink-collar0.82 (0.41–1.65)1.11 (0.45–2.74)
Blue-collar0.73 (0.43–1.24)0.96 (0.40–2.26)
Housewife or Inoccupation0.77 (0.45–1.34)1.45 (0.66-3.19)
Region
Metropolitan city1.36 (1.00–1.84)0.94 (0.70–1.27)
Rural1.00 1.00
BMI
Obesity1.00 1.00
Normal0.76 (0.56–1.04)1.20 (0.89–1.62)
Low weight1.93 (0.56–6.63)1.53 (0.53–4.45)
Drinking
Frequently1.00 1.00
Occasionally0.59 (0.39–0.89)0.86 (0.53–1.39)
None0.74 (0.51–1.08)0.97 (0.61–1.53)
Smoking
Current smoker1.00 1.00
Ex-smoker1.41 (0.99–2.03)0.54 (0.19–1.56)
None1.10 (0.69–1.76)0.71 (0.33–1.56)
Management of Blood Glucose
Non-medication4.65 (1.37–15.81)3.47 (1.17–10.27)
Only medication5.17 (1.63–16.38)4.73 (1.78–12.59)
Only insulin7.51 (1.17–48.23)2.37 (0.25–22.98)
Both medication and insulin1.00 1.00
None8.94 (2.48–32.18)18.97 (6.11–58.88)
Chronic Disease
Only hypertension1.07 (0.73–1.55)1.09 (0.75–1.57)
Only hyperlipidemia0.98 (0.58–1.66)1.11 (0.75–1.66)
Both1.00 1.00
None0.83 (0.55–1.25)0.52 (0.32–0.85)
BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.
Table 3. Results of subgroup analysis stratified by independent variables related to health status and behavioral pattern.
Table 3. Results of subgroup analysis stratified by independent variables related to health status and behavioral pattern.
VariablesMaleFemale
Physical ExercisePhysical Exercise
NoneOnly WalkingOnly ResistanceBothNoneOnly WalkingOnly ResistanceBoth
OROR95% CIOR95% CIOR95% CIOROR95% CIOR95% CIOR95% CI
BMI
Obesity10.97(0.57–1.66)1.28(0.66–2.45)2.12(1.06–4.25)10.89(0.53–1.47)0.68(0.21–2.23)2.89(1.15–7.27)
Normal10.9(0.54–1.50)1.15(0.56–2.38)1.76(0.96–3.22)10.91(0.57–1.45)1.09(0.40–2.95)0.44(0.15–1.27)
Low weight1 1
Drinking
Frequently10.84(0.52–1.35)1.49(0.77–2.88)2.33(1.29–4.19)10.5(0.18–1.34)0.26(0.05–1.41)0.22(0.05–0.98)
Occasionally10.73(0.24–2.27)0.76(0.19–3.03)1.83(0.67–4.99)11.73(0.87–3.47)5.42(1.39–21.11)3.2(0.97–10.59)
None11.09(0.49–2.40)0.72(0.31–1.68)1.19(0.39–3.69)10.84(0.54–1.30)0.35(0.12–0.96)1.03(0.43–2.44)
Smoking
Current smoker10.73(0.36–1.45)1.36(0.51–3.64)1.73(0.60–5.04)1
Ex–smoker10.98(0.59–1.64)1.26(0.68–2.35)1.73(0.97–3.09)1
None10.77(0.32–1.86)0.7(0.22–2.18)2.04(0.70–5.92)10.91(0.64–1.28)1.04(0.46–2.32)1.02(0.46–2.27)
Management of Blood Glucose
Non–medication or etc10.71(0.19–2.58)0.96(0.16–5.57)3.22(0.84–12.30)10.19(0.04–0.93)0.04(0.00–1.86)1.05(0.15–7.64)
Only medication10.82(0.54–1.24)1.24(0.70–2.19)1.6(0.94–2.73)10.95(0.66–1.38)1.06(0.46–2.41)1.29(0.59–2.83)
Only insulin11(0.06–16.21)1 1 11(0.02–51.80) 1(0.02–51.80)
Both medication and insulin1 14.69(0.55–389.17) 1
None11.08(0.18–6.32)0.58(0.09–3.53)1.66(0.23–12.03)111.16(1.01–123.51)1.35(0.06–28.38)18.87(0.52–681.57)
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yun, I.; Joo, H.J.; Park, Y.S.; Park, E.-C. Association between Physical Exercise and Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Korean Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063280

AMA Style

Yun I, Joo HJ, Park YS, Park E-C. Association between Physical Exercise and Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Korean Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(6):3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yun, Il, Hye Jin Joo, Yu Shin Park, and Eun-Cheol Park. 2022. "Association between Physical Exercise and Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Korean Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 6: 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop