Quality of National Disease Surveillance Reporting before and during COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Study in Indonesia
, Hanevi Djasri 1, Aldilas Achmad Nursetyo 1, Andriani Yulianti 1, Bernadeta Rachela Adipradipta 1, William Hawley 3, Jennifer Mika 3, Catharina Yekti Praptiningsih 3, Amalya Mangiri 3, Endang Burni Prasetyowati 4 and Laura Brye 5Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The study became more structured, the authors have made great efforts to solve the problems, but it can support minor corrections.
The statistical demonstration for the validity of the study and of the survey are still missing.
Results must follow the study objective set in lines 110-113, and this connection is still missing.
Maybe more data presentation could be useful.
Conclusions must be completed and connected with the study objective set in lines 110-113.
Author Response
The study became more structured, the authors have made great efforts to solve the problems, but it can support minor corrections.
Author respond : Thank you for your insightful inputs. We have highlighted the changes in the revised manuscript.
The statistical demonstration for the validity of the study and of the survey are still missing.
Author respond : Thank you for outlining this issue. We added more on validity assesment before study in line 2017 – 212.
Results must follow the study objective set in lines 110-113, and this connection is still missing.
Author respond : Thank you for your comment. We have rearranged the result section according to your input.
Maybe more data presentation could be useful.
Author respond : Thanks for your comments. We add more data presentation into supplement of the manuscript.
Conclusions must be completed and connected with the study objective set in lines 110-113.
Author respond : Thank you for your comment. We have rewrite the conclusion section after some consideration to your input.
Reviewer 2 Report
There are still language-related issues in this paper. A thorough review is recommended.
However, I'm satisfied with your responses and the changes you have made in the paper.
Author Response
There are still language-related issues in this paper. A thorough review is recommended.
However, I'm satisfied with your responses and the changes you have made in the paper.
Author respond : Thank you for your comment. We have carefully recheck the language by our Native English-speaking author. And also asked our Native English-speaking colleague to proofread our manuscript.
Reviewer 3 Report
I believe I had previously reviewed this manuscript. The authors seem to have addressed the points of concern that I raised then. The quality of writing and English must be improved and proofread by native-speaking editors.
Author Response
I believe I had previously reviewed this manuscript. The authors seem to have addressed the points of concern that I raised then. The quality of writing and English must be improved and proofread by native-speaking editors.
Author respond : Thank you for your comment. We have carefully recheck the language by our Native English-speaking author. And also asked our Native English-speaking colleague to proofread our manuscript.
