Next Article in Journal
Extraction, Purification, Characterization and Application in Livestock Wastewater of S Sulfur Convertase
Previous Article in Journal
Telesupervision in Psychotherapy: A Bibliometric and Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 23
10.3390/ijerph192316367
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Relationship between Social Participation and Subjective Well-Being among Older People in the Chinese Culture Context: The Mediating Effect of Reciprocity Beliefs

by
Xinyu He
1,*,
Daniel T. L. Shek
2,
Wenbin Du
3,*,
Yangu Pan
3 and
Yin Ma
4
1
Humanities and Law School, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
2
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China
3
Research Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, No. 555, Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, China
4
School of Business, Sichuan Normal University, No. 5, Jingan Avenue, Jinjiang District, Chengdu 610101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 16367; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316367
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 3 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
It is demonstrated that the subjective well-being (SWB) of older people greatly relies on their social participation. However, there are few studies on reciprocity beliefs as a mediating mechanism between social participation and SWB. In this study, 297 participants aged 60 and over in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China, completed a questionnaire of social participation, reciprocity beliefs, and SWB. We used multiple linear regression and mediation analyses to verify the mediating effect of reciprocity beliefs. Results showed that social participation was positively relative to SWB and reciprocity beliefs, and reciprocity beliefs played an intermediary role in social participation and SWB. These findings suggest the importance of social participation for SWB, with reciprocity beliefs (behaviors) playing a positive mediating role, particularly in China. In conclusion, analysis of the mediating effect of reciprocity beliefs provides us with knowledge that could help in achieving a healthy old age. Additionally, this study opens up new perspectives of research.

1. Introduction

China’s aging problem is becoming increasingly serious, with 264 million people aged 60 and over, accounting for 18.3% of the total population in 2020. In this sense, China has entered an aging society [1]. Previous literature has shown that with age, the different abilities of people are affected, with a cognitive and physical decline and a reduction in social contact [2,3], which might eventually lead to a decline in SWB [4,5]. Subjective well-being is considered to be people’s affective reactions, domain satisfaction, and life satisfaction [6,7]. Affective reactions include negative and positive emotions [8], which represent a person’s subjective evaluation of the events that happen in their lives. In addition, work satisfaction, family satisfaction, and group satisfaction are three types of domain satisfaction [6]. For older people, the more active they are in the relationships with family, relatives, friends, or other social groups, the more positive emotions they can experience, which is conducive to improving their SWB [9,10]. Additionally, many researchers are interested in life satisfaction, referring to a person’s self-evaluation of his/her life [11]. In gerontology, life satisfaction is a concept often used to assess subjective well-being [12]; for example, a self-evaluation in the past, present, and future [6]. The measurement of subjective well-being may predict the health behavior of the elderly and contribute to the realization of healthy aging [13,14]. As a result, elderly SWB has received increasing attention in recent years [15]. More research into the variables that influence self-evaluation of life satisfaction in older people is of fundamental importance for enhancing their SWB.
Social participation is a form of social interaction, including a series of activities with family, friends, and other individuals [16,17], which has been shown to improve the health and SWB of older adults [18,19,20]. Older people who participate more in social activities have a higher SWB than those who participate less [21,22]. Studies also show older people who spent more time on these social activities could gain a stronger sense of purpose, more resources, and a greater motivation to practice behaviors that improve SWB, all of which may contribute to better well-being [23]. This is, perhaps, because social participation that involves interaction or communication with others provides immediate emotional benefits for older people and enhances their sense of social support [24]. Olesen and Berry conducted interviews with eight elderly people, who narrated their experiences of participating in social activities, and results showed that social participation is beneficial to improving self-efficacy, a sense of belonging, and mental health [25].
To our best knowledge, in China, social communication that has developed over thousands of years of agricultural civilization has its roots in the small, localized peasant economy, which emphasizes human relationships between family members, relatives, and neighbors [26]. The interaction with family, friends, and neighbors is an important factor that can increase positive emotions and improve SWB among older Chinese people [27,28,29].
Activity theory supports the correlation between social participation and SWB noted above. Activity theory suggests that older people who regularly participate in social activities may maintain a positive self-concept and improve their sense of accomplishment, both of which contribute to increased well-being in later life [16]. This theory is often used to explain the link between social participation and well-being in older people. Active participation in social activities can expand one’s social network, because, after leaving the workplace, many older adults lose the social ties that younger people develop through work [30]; thus, social participation can not only strengthen social ties, but also increase the exchange of information and emotional support in the elderly, and, thereby, further enhance SWB [31,32,33].
Another problem highlighted in the literature is that the determinants of life satisfaction may differ by gender and cultural context [34,35]. Studies show that in terms of gender, there is different SWB for men and women [36,37]. Okabayashi and Hougham found there were some gender differences in the influence of social interaction on the happiness of the elderly [38]. Older men tend to engage in going to the bar and going out outdoors, while for older women, travel, sports, or tourism are the social participation activities that predict SWB [39].
In addition, empirical research has determined that reciprocity beliefs are associated with both social participation and SWB in older people [40,41,42,43]. Reciprocity beliefs refer to individual’s idea of reciprocity-based behavior and their expectations that others will engage in such behavior [44]. Reciprocity beliefs have held a foundational place in Chinese culture since ancient times [45]. The traditional Chinese mentality is based on a familial and social construction of wenqing (warm-heartedness), through which everyone can receive and pay back material resources and spiritual wealth. The Book of Songs, written in the middle of the Spring and Autumn period in Chinese history (roughly 771 to 476 before the Christian Era), contained the idiom: “Give me a peach and I will give you a plum.” [46,47]. These form the foundation of a strong sense of reciprocity among Chinese people, who typically reestablish networks of relationships and maintain long-term communication with others through social participation, mutual assistance, and reciprocity [48,49]. Therefore, in the context of Chinese culture, reciprocal relationships with others are an important factor in their lives [50]. Moreover, social participation is the basis and premise for the conversion of reciprocity beliefs into reciprocity behavior. Repeated social interactions that reflect expectations of reciprocal exchange can reinforce reciprocity beliefs and drive the mutualistic escalation in the relationships [51]. Older people with extensive social participation and strong beliefs in reciprocity, who exert their proactivity in social interactions, experience more positive affect and receive more empathy from others, which in turn translates into higher SWB [52,53].
According to the socioemotional selectivity theory [54], those who grow older are more likely to choose social participation that provides them with close social relations. Thus, compared with other groups, older people tend to choose social networks with strong interactive relationships and stronger reciprocity beliefs, and the regard the principle of reciprocity as a way to maintain SWB. Research on parent-child relationships between generations indicate that the elderly parents in families who had reciprocity beliefs reported higher happiness than those who did not hold such reciprocity beliefs [55]. Other studies have demonstrated that reciprocity beliefs could promote mental well-being in older people [56]. In a study involving 244 Chinese adolescents, results showed that positive reciprocity beliefs play a moderating role in the relationship between the development of a proactive personality and personal life satisfaction [42]. In another study, results showed that more positive perceptions of balanced relationships, equitable treatment, and reciprocity in the interpersonal domain were associated with higher SWB [56]. A negative correlation between reciprocity beliefs and SWB has also been revealed in research, which found that the less reciprocity beliefs, the greater well-being [57].
As the existing research is not consistent, it would be useful to further examine the relationship between reciprocity beliefs and SWB. It is worth noting that, in the Chinese culture context, where the expectation that “the courtesy demands reciprocity” is highly valued [58], it could be particularly fruitful. The Confucian concept of ren’ai (seek also to establish others if wishing to be established oneself; seek also to enlarge others if wishing to be enlarged oneself) has a strong influence on Chinese society as a value that stabilizes the social order and maintains harmonious communication among Chinese people [59]. One particularly important feature of ren’ai, helping behavior (e.g., volunteering in the community, providing emotional support), has long been found to increase the well-being of the elderly [60]. In addition to ren’ai, Chinese people also focus on bao’en (when you drink the water, remember its origin). In such an ethically oriented society, the expectation is that Chinese people have a deeply-held debt-paying mentality combined with a cultural aim to seek harmony and balance [61]. When they engage in relationships with others, those who receive help have obligations to reciprocate, and such reciprocation may be more instrumental, such as solving problems or sharing responsibilities [53]. In a sense, Confucianism is a way of life that offers a theory about interpersonal relationships that holds that a harmonious relationship can only be realized in the context of human reciprocity [62].
The fact that the relationship between social participation and SWB could be mediated by reciprocity beliefs can be explained by the reciprocity theory of exchange [63]. According to this theory, reciprocity is structured with respect to the way the expected behaviors and benefits of exchange are connected, thus different reciprocal structures involve different forms of exchange [64]. People communicate and connect with each other through social participation and establish social relationships [65], and, in particular, reciprocal relationships are believed to improve SWB in older people [66]. In addition, the purpose of the social participation of older people is not to obtain certain benefits; there is more uncertainty about giving and giving back, which are more likely to seem voluntary [67]. In contrast, people give help, resources, and affection to others willingly and with kind intent [68]. The strong belief in reciprocity held by Chinese people influences the way they engage in exchange in relationships. In the reciprocal process of getting help or giving help to others, the older people of any culture are more likely to experience a sense of satisfaction and achievement, which is conducive to improving their SWB.
In sum, Chinese people pay attention to the social communication mode of “reciprocity”, and the social participation of older people is both an important way to establish communication with others and the premise and basis for the practice of reciprocity beliefs. Older people with strong reciprocity beliefs can gain more instrumental and emotional support to improve their SWB through active participation in social activities [56].
Although these associations are well known, few research studies have included all these variables, and, in particular, the path from social participation to SWB via reciprocity beliefs in older people has not been fully demonstrated. In the context of Chinese culture, this study explored the mediating role of reciprocity beliefs between the social participation and SWB of older people. Therefore, we propose the following four hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1.
Social participation is positively related to SWB in older men and women.
Hypothesis 2.
Social participation is positively related to reciprocity beliefs in older men and women.
Hypothesis 3.
Reciprocity beliefs are positively related to SWB in older men and women.
Hypothesis 4.
Reciprocity beliefs play a mediating role in social participation and SWB in older men and women.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This study was conducted between 20 December 2016 and 25 January 2017 in five districts in Chengdu: Jinjiang, Wuhou, Qingyang, Chenghua, and Jinniu Districts. The study included people from 15 communities. The participants were aged 60 and over, and they lived in the above communities. The communities in each administrative region were numbered one by one in alphabetical order, and the communities numbered 01, 11, and 21 in each administrative region were selected, respectively, and a random sample of 20 people in each community and 60 people in each administrative region were surveyed. A total of 300 people in 5 administrative regions were selected for the questionnaire survey, and 297 valid questionnaires were collected. Finally, 297 Chinese people aged 60 and above, with help and explanation as needed from professional researchers, completed the survey that formed the basis of this study. The survey included socio-demographic information, as well as social participation, reciprocity beliefs, and SWB variables.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Subjective Well-Being (SWB)

In this study, SWB was measured following a similar approach to that taken by Cui [69], who developed 20 items based on Diener’s concept of life evaluation (past, present, future) to measure the SWB of older people. Six questions were used to measure past SWB, for instance, “There were few regrets in my life”; “Compared with my peers, I had done a lot of stupid things”; “Looking back on my life, I had done almost nothing right”; “My life was very hard and lonely, I do not want to think about it”. Eight questions were used to measure present SWB, for example, “Recently, I feel very happy in my life”; “I am happy with my lifestyle”; “Everyday, life is very boring”; “Recently, I am prone to get angry”; “Recently, there are more sad things than happy things”. Six questions were used to measure future SWB, such as “I am full of hope for the future”; “In the future, there will be many interesting and happy things around me”; “In the future, there is almost nothing that I will be able to do”; “In the future, I will no longer be able to do anything of value”. Statements were responded to on a five-point frequency scale ranging from 1 (never), 2 (seldom), 3 (sometimes), 4 (regularly), to 5 (very frequently), and responses were partially reverse-coded so that the higher score indicates greater SWB. The Cronbach’s alpha in the present study is 0.821.

2.2.2. Social Participation

Social participation was measured following a similar approach to that taken by Song [70], who developed 28 items to measure the social participation of older people (including participation in family gatherings, hobby groups, religious groups, political groups, etc.). According to the design of this article and Chinese cultural background, five questions were used to measure participants’ involvement in the following participation. For example, “Do you participate in community voting activities?”; “Do you get together with family, friends, and neighbors, to go shopping or travel?”. All of the items were rated using the aforementioned five-point frequency response scale. The Cronbach’s alpha in the present study is 0.663.

2.2.3. Reciprocity Beliefs

Reciprocity beliefs were measured following a similar approach to that taken by Lin [71], who used 7 items to measure the general rules and reciprocity rules of older people. According to the design of this article, we adopted four questions to measure the reciprocity beliefs. For example, “Have you helped others?”; “Do you believe that, when you need help, the people who will help you will be those who received help from you previously?”; “Have you received help from others?”; “Will you help others who helped you previously?”. The questions were answered on a five-point-scale ranging from 1 (completely do not believe), 2 (believe less), 3 (does not matter), 4 (believe more), to 5 (completely believe). The Cronbach’s alpha in the present study is 0.678.

2.2.4. Demographic Measures

We collected demographic variables of gender (0 = male; 1 = female), age (0 = 60–69; 1 = 70–79; 2 = 80 and above), educational attainment (0 = technical college and above; 1= primary school and below; 2 = middle and high school), self-rated health status (0 = healthy; 1 = average; 2 = unhealthy), whether living with children (0 = live with children; 1 = do not live with children; 2 = no children), income status (0 = ≤3000 RMB; 1 = 3001–4999 RMB; 2 = ≥5000 RMB), and self-rated socioeconomic status (0 = higher; 1 = average; 2 = lower).

2.3. Data Analytic Strategy

We used the regression model for data analysis in SPSS22.0. First, we performed a descriptive analysis of all variables (see Table 1). Second, we used correlational analyses to test whether reciprocity beliefs were associated with the mediators and outcome variable in the expected directions (see Table 2 and Table 3). Third, we used multiple mediation analysis to verify the relationship between social participation, SWB, and reciprocity beliefs (Hypothesis 1, 2, and 3; see Table 4 and Table 5; Figure 1 and Figure 2). Finally, in order to examine whether there were mediation effects of reciprocity beliefs between social participation and SWB, we used the SPSS Macro PROCESS program 4.1 designed by Preacher and Hayes [72] to complete data analyses. The bootstrap confidence interval (CI) was set to 95%, and the number of bootstrap samples was 5000. If the CI of the indirect effect did not include zero, the mediation effect was proved to be significant (Hypothesis 4; see Table 6 and Table 7).

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Results

Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics of the variables. Though the average older men and women scores with respect to SWB were similar, above neutral (3.0), and, thus, leaning towards the “satisfied” side, the average SWB levels of men (=3.74) were slightly higher than those of women.
Among the age groups, men aged 70 to 79 accounted for the largest proportion, while women aged 60 to 69 accounted for the largest proportion. As to educational attainment, compared to women, older men had attained a higher rate of college education, with around 26.9% being educated at that level. More than half of the older people considered themselves to be of average health, with only about 10% acknowledging that they are unhealthy. Even though the older people surveyed in Chengdu indicated that they do not want to live with their children, older women were more likely to express a desire to live (or consider living) with their children than their male counterparts. The monthly income of most of the older people in this study is below RMB 3000. Compared to the older women in this study, a higher proportion of the older men had a monthly income over RMB 5000. Regardless of gender, no older people participants considered themselves to have a high socio-economic status.

3.2. Correlation of Social Participation, Reciprocity Beliefs, and SWB

The correlations between the examined variables are shown in Table 2 (older men) and Table 3 (older women). The results of the correlation analyses are statistically significant (p < 0.001). First, social participation is significantly positively correlated with reciprocity beliefs (r1 = 0.429; r2 = 0.371). Second, social participation is significantly positively correlated with SWB (r1 = 0.515; r2 = 0.418). Third, reciprocity beliefs are significantly positively correlated with SWB (r1 = 0.638; r2 = 0.501).

3.3. Relationship between Social Participation, Reciprocity Beliefs, and SWB

The multiple mediation analyses are presented in Table 4 (older men) and Table 5 (older women). The results showed that, when controlling for age, educational attainment, self-rated health status, whether living with children, income status, and self-rated socioeconomic status, social participation is positively related to reciprocity beliefs (a1 = 0.401, a2 = 0.329, p < 0.001). In addition, reciprocity beliefs are also positively related to SWB (b1 = 0.317, b2 = 0.377, p < 0.001), and social participation is positively related to SWB (c’1 = 0.425, c’2 = 0.419, p < 0.001) (see Figure 1 and Figure 2).

3.4. Mediation Effect of Reciprocity Beliefs on the Relationship between Social Participation and SWB

The mediation analysis found that the relationship between social participation and SWB is partially mediated by reciprocity beliefs in older men and women (see Figure 1 and Figure 2, Table 6 and Table 7), the direct effect of social participation on SWB remained significant in older men and women (Β1 = 0.153, p < 0.01; Β2 = 0.166, p < 0.001), and the indirect effects of social participation on SWB through reciprocity beliefs are significant in older men and women (indirect effects = 0.086 and 0.054; Bootstrap 95% CI = [0.039, 0.155] and [0.024, 0.094], respectively). Moreover, the contrast test of the indirect effects found that the indirect effect of reciprocity beliefs was stronger in older men (36%) than in older women (25%).

4. Discussion

Our research used the self-evaluation of life satisfaction to assess subjective well-being among older people. The results suggest that older people with frequent social participation have higher SWB and stronger reciprocity beliefs. These results are consistent with previous studies that show older people who have frequent social participation can obtain more social resources and, thus, improve their SWB [73,74]. Finding social participation to be positively related to reciprocity beliefs could be explained in the context of the socioemotional selectivity theory [54]; that is, with age, older people tend to choose those social relationships that can provide them social reciprocity, which can enhance their health and happiness in China, where reciprocity beliefs are widely recognized and valued [75]. In societies, older people are also expected to play a valuable role and social interaction is reciprocal, which is a guiding principle for maintaining harmony [76]. Thus, in the Chinese cultural context, social participation is a key way for older people to establish social relations after retirement, and it is the carrier of the beliefs of practical reciprocity.
We also found reciprocity beliefs were positively related to SWB in older men and women. This is similar to the previous studies. Tuominen and Haanpää‘s study explored the association between the social capital of young people and their SWB using Finland’s sub-sample of the third wave of the International Survey of Children’s Well-Being. Their results showed that reciprocity is related to SWB [77]. Another study showed that the importance of perceived reciprocity in SWB increases with age [78]. According to that study, to improve the mental health of the elderly, reciprocity in social exchanges is an important factor [66], and it should be noted that older Chinese people have reported having more reciprocal friendships of emotional solace than young Chinese people have [56]. People who hold reciprocity beliefs know that reciprocal social interactions are beneficial for both the group and the individual; thus, they display positive giving behaviors to their peers, showing more sincere care and help towards others. Those who receive the help have a willingness to repay, such as solving problems, thereby sharing the pressure. In addition, people who have strong beliefs in reciprocity may receive more emotional comfort, such as being heard, receiving affective rewards, and sharing experiences. These emotional feedbacks fulfill the need for belonging, making older people more satisfied with their lives [53]. Aging is inevitable, and most of us experience gradual decline in physical function during this period, resulting in an increased need for help from others. Rather than paying attention to the negative dependency of older people associated with decline and disengagement, interdependence may be constructed as a phase of reciprocity and connectedness, i.e., seeking and accepting help that can be viewed as a way to maintain connectedness between people [79]. As self-determination theory suggests [80], life satisfaction of basic need or emotional need, such as the need for autonomy, competence, and social connection, enhances individual happiness.
Our results found that reciprocity beliefs mediate the effect of social relationships on SWB in older people. This result is consistent with the finding of Wahrendorf’s study [81] that, based on reciprocity in the activities of older adults in mainland Europe, participation in socially productive activities was associated with happiness. Furthermore, Mcmunn’s study underscored that the reciprocity of social relations can be used to explain the relationship between participation in socially productive activities and the well-being of post-retirement age people in England [82]. It has been argued that social participation provides immediate emotional comforts through interaction or communication with others and expands one’s social support [24]. Chinese people value harmony and balance, which is achieved through the practice of reciprocity beliefs. Of course, Western cultures also value reciprocity, but such tendencies may be more strongly imposed in Chinese society [49]. The ancient Chinese book The «Guodian Bamboo Slips» states, “Dao begins with feelings”. This means that relationships between people originate from feelings. A unique collectivist, cultural context in Chinese societies promotes the value of social relationships and connectedness with others, including families, friends, and neighbors [83].
Finally, this study also revealed the mediating effects of reciprocity beliefs are stronger in older men than older women. This is in agreement with Tsai and Dzorgbo’s study, who found gender differences have substantial impacts on reciprocity and an individual’s SWB; compared to women, Ghanaian men are more likely to maintain reciprocity in later life [84]. However, a study shows that, in Europe, ‘reciprocal-like’ giving and receiving is more likely to occur and be expected among elderly women and those with a network of relationships within close distances [85]. This suggests that reciprocity beliefs may be generally stronger among older women. According to our results, we predicted that reciprocity beliefs would have a greater impact on older men’s SWB. Since, during old age, the resources owned further decline [86], it may be increasingly difficult for older people to return the support received, making older people less likely to maintain reciprocal relationships in old age [87]. However, the value of reciprocity beliefs is deeply ingrained in Chinese people [88], who want to maintain long-term relationships through reciprocity. According to the Chinese retirement scheme, the retirement age is 60 for men, 55 years for female professionals/cadres (including teachers, administrators medical personnel, and other personnel of public institutions), and 50 years for other female workers. As, in China, women often retire earlier than men, they have the ability to adapt to retirement earlier, and they also have more time and opportunities to participate in social activities. In Chinese tradition, older women are usually not expected to work for a living, and they prefer to participate in many social activities [89]. They tend to interact with and support each other through social participation, even if there is no explicit exchange purpose. Consequently, compared to older men, older women have more opportunities to form reciprocal relationships with others in China. According to this view, since older men are more threatened by the goal of reciprocity relationships, they may try harder to achieve it [77]; hence, the mediating effects of reciprocity beliefs are stronger.
Indeed, improving SWB is beneficial to the physical and mental health of the elderly and reduces depression [90,91]. How to enhance the SWB of older people is an important social issue. Therefore, in order to clarify the factors affecting SWB, we urge researchers not to limit future studies to the direct effects of social participation on SWB in older people. We call for policymakers to encourage older people to participate in neighborhood or community affairs in China, thereby promoting the positive identity older people could achieve through social networks of community inclusion, interdependence and reciprocity, and exploring available exchange resources. Determining how best to assist older people’s recognition of the value of their existing exchange resources in reciprocal relationships, as well as fostering meaningful interactions among participants, is likely to be important [92]. Although older people may not join a given social activity with the intention of exchanging benefits, engaging in activities that stimulate reciprocity can facilitate greater overall social participation levels. In fact, the emotional exchange of human contact is a kind of reciprocity that can produce strong bonds of trust and solidarity between actors; in turn, these bonds will improve the enthusiasm of the participants to continue to engage in social activities [64]. One way to do this would be to reciprocate the involvement of older people as participants or volunteers in a community cultural or sports activity by offering them practical support, such as long-term care insurance or other forms of financial and social assistance, in return.

5. Limitations and Future Directions

Limitations of this study are as follows. First, since the data are cross-sectional and lack longitudinal data, it is difficult to show changes in social participation, subjective well-being, or reciprocity beliefs. By collecting long-term data, a future study could examine longitudinal changes and causality. Second, although this study emphasized the importance of Chinese reciprocity beliefs, it was unable to take into account the different expectations of family members and acquaintances when it comes to reciprocity beliefs in China. To explore the impact of different relationships on SWB more precisely, reciprocity beliefs could be further subdivided into reciprocity with “acquaintances” and reciprocity with “strangers” in future research. Finally, the data was limited to the population surveyed: elderly males and females from Chengdu City, Sichuan Province. Given that China is a vast country, and its regions have unique demographic characteristics, it would be interesting to investigate any variations between urban and rural areas, and between different provinces.

6. Conclusions

This study examined the associations between social participation and SWB and the mediation effects of reciprocity beliefs between social participation and SWB among a sample of older Chinese adults. Our research results confirmed all the hypotheses we made in the paper. We found that social participation was associated with both SWB and reciprocity beliefs, and we also found reciprocity beliefs could mediate the relationship between social participation and SWB in older people in China. These findings suggest the importance of social participation for SWB, with reciprocity beliefs (behaviors) playing a positive mediating role, particularly in China. In conclusion, analysis of the mediating effect of reciprocity beliefs provides us with knowledge that could help in achieving a healthy old age. Additionally, this study opens up new perspectives for research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.H.; Data curation, W.D. and Y.M.; Formal analysis, X.H. and Y.P.; Funding acquisition, X.H.; Investigation, X.H. and D.T.L.S.; Methodology, X.H. and Y.P.; Resources, D.T.L.S.; Writing—original draft, X.H.; Writing—review & editing, D.T.L.S., W.D., and Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Center for Rural Community Governance Research, Project of Key Research Base of Social Science in Sichuan Province, in China, grant number SQZL2019B06.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Research Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, (Process SWUFE 10/2022), and was implemented according to the guidelines for human research of the Helsinki Declaration.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors. Any interests, please contact the author of correspondence.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the older people who participated in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seventh National Census Main Data. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/pcsj/rkpc/d7c/202111/P020211126523667366751.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2022).
  2. Ramlagan, S.; Peltzer, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, N. Social capital and health among older adults in South Africa. BMC Geriatr. 2013, 13, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, Y.; Feeley, T.H. Social support, social strain, loneliness, and well-being among older adults: An analysis of the health and retirement study. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 2014, 31, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Farriol-Baroni, V.; González-García, L.; Luque-García, A.; Postigo-Zegarra, S.; Pérez-Ruiz, S. Influence of social support and subjective well-being on the perceived overall health of the elderly. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Van-loon, A.M.; Depla, M.F.I.A.; Hertogh, C.M.P.M.; Huisman, M.; Kok, A.A.L. The disability paradox? Trajectories of well-being in older adults with functional decline. J. Aging Health 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Diener, E.; Eunkook, M.S.; Lucas, R.E.; Smith, H.L. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125, 276–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, A.W.; Chatters, L.M.; Taylor, R.J.; Mouzon, D.M. Social support from family and friends and subjective well-being of older African Americans. J. Happiness Stud. 2016, 17, 959–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Soosova, M.S.; Timkova, V.; Dimunova, L.; Mauer, B. Spirituality as a mediator between depressive symptoms and subjective well-being in older adults. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2021, 30, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rafsson, S.B.; Shankar, A.; Steptoe, A. Llongitudinal influences of social network characteristics on subjective well-being of older adults: Findings from the ELSA study. J. Aging Health 2015, 27, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Cheng, X.F.; Li, X.M.; Liu, H.J.; Cosco, T.D.; Duan, W.J. Widowhood and the subjective well-being of older people in China: The mediating effects of lifestyle. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2020, 16, 875–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, Z.; Jiang, X. Core self-evaluation and life satisfaction: The person-environment fit perspective. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2015, 75, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meggiolaro, S.; Ongaro, F. Life satisfaction among older people in Italy in a gender approach. Ageing Soc. 2015, 35, 1481–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leventhal, A.M.; Zvolensky, M.J.; Schmidt, N.B. Smoking-related correlates of depressive symptom dimensions in treatment-seeking smokers. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2011, 13, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Stenlund, S.; Junttila, N.; Koivumaa-Honkaen, H.; Sillanmaki, L.; Stenlund, D.; Suominen, S.; Lagstrom, H.; Rautava, P. Longitudinal stability and interrelations between health behavior and subjective well-being in a follow-up of nine years. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jiang, S.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Fang, X. The mediating effect of neighbor relationship between community social support and elderly’s subjective well-being in China. J. Health Psychol. 2020, 25, 780–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dai, B.B.; Zhang, B.S.; Li, J. Protective factors for subjective well-being in Chinese older adults: The roles of resources and activity. J. Happiness Stud. 2013, 14, 1225–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J. Social participation and subjective well-being among retirees in China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 123, 143–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schmiedeberg, C.; Schröder, J. Leisure activities and life satisfaction: An analysis with German panel data. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2017, 12, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rey, L.; Extremera, N.; Sánchez-Álvarez, N. Clarifying the links between perceived emotional intelligence and well-being in older people: Pathways through perceived social support from family and friends. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2019, 14, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tao, B.; Chen, H.; Lu, T.C.; Yan, J. The effect of physical exercise and internet use on youth subjective well-being—The mediating role of life satisfaction and the moderating effect of social mentality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Donder, D.L.; Witte, D.N.; Buffel, T.; Dury, S. Social capital and feelings of unsafety in later life: A study on the influence of social networks, place attachment, and civic participation on perceived safety in Belgium. Res. Aging 2012, 34, 425–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Won, D.; Bae, J.S.; Byun, H.; Seo, K.B. Enhancing subjective well-being through physical activity for the elderly in Korea: A meta-analysis approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Thomas, P.A. Gender, social engagement, and limitations in late life. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 73, 1428–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Berkman, L.F.; Glass, T.; Brissette, I.; Seeman, T.E. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc. Sci. Med. 2000, 125, 843–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Olesen, S.C.; Berry, H.L. Community participation and mental health during retirement in community sample of Australians. Aging Ment. Health 2011, 15, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ye, D.; Ng, Y.K.; Lian, Y. Culture and happiness. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 123, 519–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, H.; Ji, Y.; Chen, T. The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among Chinese elderly. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wilson, A.; Wissing, M.P.; Schutte, L. “We help each other”: Relational patterns among older individuals in South African samples. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2019, 14, 1373–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, J.H.; Liang, C.Y.; Lucas, J.; Cheng, W.J.; Zhao, Z.Y. The influence of income and social capital on the subjective well-being of elderly Chinese people, based on a panel survey. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Niedzwiedz, C.L.; Richardson, E.A.; Tunstall, H.; Shortt, N.K.; Mitchell, R.J.; Pearce, J.R. The relationship between wealth and loneliness among older people across Europe: Is social participation protective? Prev. Med. 2016, 91, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Guo, Q.; Bai, X.; Feng, N. Social participation and depressive symptoms among Chinese older adults: A study on rural–urban differences. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 239, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carandang, R.R.; Shibanuma, A.; Asis, E.; Chavez, D.C.; Tuliao, M.T.; Jimba, M. “Are filipinos aging well?”: Determinants of subjective well-being among senior citizens of the community-based ENGAGE Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, R.; Feng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y. Relationship between neighbourhood social participation and depression among older adults: A longitudinal study in China. Health Soc. Care Community 2020, 28, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Walker, A. A European perspective on quality of life in old age. Eur. J. Ageing 2005, 2, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Patel, R.; Marbaniang, S.P.; Srivastava, S.; Kumar, P.; Chauhan, S.; Simon, D.J. Gender differential in low psychological health and low subjective well-being among older adults in India: With special focus on childless older adults. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Adams, K.B.; Leibbrandt, S.; Moon, H. A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing Soc. 2011, 31, 683–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Matud, M.P.; Garcia, M.C.; Fortes, D. Relevance of gender and social support in self-rated health and life satisfaction in elderly Spanish people. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Okabayashi, H.; Hougham, G.W. Gender differences of social interactions and their effects on subjective well-being among Japanese elders. Aging Ment. Health 2014, 18, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Dei Barrio, E.; Pinzon, S.; Marsillas, S.; Garrido, F. Physical environment vs. social environment: What factors of age-friendliness predict subjective well-being in men and women? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, H.; Li, S.; Xiao, Q.; Feldman, M.W. Social support and psychological well-being under social change in urban and rural China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2014, 119, 979–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Verbrugge, L.M.; Ang, S. Family reciprocity of older Singaporeans. Eur. J. Ageing 2018, 15, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, R.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yao, Y. Neighborhood social reciprocity and mental health among older adults in China: The mediating effects of physical activity, social interaction, and volunteering. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Akinrolie, O.; Okoh, A.C.; Kalu, M.E. Intergenerational support between older adults and adult children in Nigeria: The role of reciprocity. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 2020, 63, 478–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, C.K.; Jiang, S.; Li, N.; Zhang, Q.N. Influence of social participation on life satisfaction and depression among Chinese elderly: Social support as a mediator. J. Community Psychol. 2018, 46, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, L.T.; Van, H.K.; Perez-Y-Perez, M.; Zheng, Y.Q. Issues of elder care among migrant workers in contemporary rural China: Filial piety redefined from a foucauldian perspective. J. Aging Soc. Policy 2021, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang, H.C.; Holt, G.R. Debt-repaying mechanism in Chinese relationships: An exploration of the folk concepts of pao and human emotional debt. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 1994, 27, 351–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, X.; Zhu, P.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z. The effect of reciprocity disposition on giving and repaying reciprocity behavior. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2017, 109, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, Y.Y. Bao: Notion of Chinese on social exchange. In Paper Collections of Studies on Chinese Social Psychology; Chinese Psychological Society: Beijing, China, 1993; pp. 158–170. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.X. Belief in reciprocity in a Chinese sample. Psychol. Rep. 2012, 111, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tam, K.P.; Lau, H.P.B.; Jiang, D. Culture and subjective well-being: A dynamic constructivist view. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2012, 43, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Deng, Y.; Wang, C.S.; Aime, F.; Wang, L.; Sivanathan, N.; Kim, Y.C. Culture and patterns of reciprocity: The role of exchange type, regulatory focus, and emotions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2021, 47, 20–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dumitrache, C.G.; Rubio, L.; Rubio-Herrera, R. Extroversion, social support and life satisfaction in old age: A mediation model. Aging Ment. Health 2017, 22, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, S.; Li, Y.P.; Tu, Y.D. Linking proactive personality to life satisfaction in the Chinese context: The mediation of inter-personal trust and moderation of positive reciprocity beliefs. J. Happiness Stud. 2018, 20, 2471–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Carstensen, L. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol. Aging 1992, 7, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Peng, C.; Kwok, C.L.; Law, Y.W.; Yip, P.S.F.; Cheng, Q.J. Intergenerational support, satisfaction with parent–child relationship and elderly parents’ life satisfaction in Hong Kong. Aging Ment. Health 2019, 23, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, T.; Fok, H.K.; Fung, H.H. Is reciprocity always beneficial? Age differences in the association between support balance and life satisfaction. Aging Ment. Health 2011, 15, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oarga, C.; Stavrova, O.; Fetchenhauer, D. When and why is helping others good for well-being? The role of belief in reciprocity and conformity to society’s expectations. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2015, 45, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aw, S.U.; Koh, G.; Oh, Y.J.; Wong, M.L.; Vrijhoef, H.J.M.; Harding, S.C.; Geronimo, M.A.B.; Lai, C.Y.F.; Hildon, Z.J.L. Explaining the continuum of social participation among older adults in Singapore: From ‘closed doors’ to active ageing in multiethnic community settings. J. Aging Stud. 2017, 42, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, Y.M. Localization of Social Work and Chinese Traditional Culture; Social Sciences Academic Press: Beijing, China, 2012; pp. 45–66. [Google Scholar]
  60. Martela, F.; Ryan, R.M. The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. J. Pers. 2016, 84, 750–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhai, X.W. A sociological exploration of the way of filial piety. Society 2019, 39, 1–35. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shang, H.P. Hsu’s Psychosocial homeostasis theory and Chinese cultural background. Int. Political Stud. 2006, 4, 130–143. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  63. Molm, L.D. Dependence and risk: Transforming the structure of social exchange. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1994, 57, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Molm, L.D. The structure of reciprocity. Soc. Psychol. Q. 2010, 73, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, J.; Beaujot, R.; Ravanera, Z. Measuring the effects of stress and social networks on the health of Canadians. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2018, 13, 891–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lowenstein, A.; Katz, R.; Gur-Yaish, N. Reciprocity in parent-child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly: A cross-national perspective. J. Soc. Issues 2007, 63, 865–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Whitham, M.M. Generalized generosity: How the norm of generalized reciprocity bridges collective forms of social exchange. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2021, 86, 503–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Verbrugge, L.M.; Chan, A. Giving help in return: Family reciprocity by older Singaporeans. Ageing Soc. 2008, 28, 5–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cui, C.Z. Development of measuring scales for life satisfaction of the elderly. Essays Inst. Korean Cult. 1986, 49, 233–256. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
  70. Cheng, J.Y. The Influence of Old Age Anxiety and Self-Integration on Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Model of Social Capital. Doctoral Dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lin, S.Y. A Study on Social Capital and Wang Satisfaction of the Elderly: Centered on Seoul City. Doctoral Dissertation, Korean-English University of Theology, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  72. Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lee, C.W.; Lin, L.C.; Hung, H.C. Art and cultural participation and life satisfaction in adults: The role of physical health, mental health, and interpersonal relationships. Front. Public Health 2021, 8, 582342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rochelle, T.L. Social participation, loneliness and well-being among older adults in Hong Kong: A longitudinal examination. Psychol. Health Med. 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zou, W.C.; Tian, Q.; Liu, J. Servant leadership, social exchange relationships, and follower’s helping behavior: Positive reci-procity belief matters. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 51, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chow, N.W. Filial piety in Asian Chinese communities. Hong Kong J. Gerontol. 1996, 10, 115–117. [Google Scholar]
  77. Braun, t.; Rohr, M.K.; Wagner, J.; Kunzmann, U. Perceived reciprocity and relationship satisfaction: Age and relationship category matter. Psychol. Aging 2018, 33, 713–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tuominen, M.; Haanpää, L. Young people’s well-being and the association with social capital, ie Social Networks, Trust and Reciprocity. Soc. Indic. Res. 2022, 159, 617–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Breheny, M.; Stephens, C. ‘I sort of pay back in my own little way’: Managing independence and social connectedness through reciprocity. Ageing Soc. 2009, 29, 1295–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nota, L.; Soresi, S.; Ferraro, L.; Wehmeyer, M.L. A multivariate analysis of the self-determination of adolescents. J. Happiness Stud. 2011, 12, 245–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wahrendorf, M.; von dem Knesebeck, O.; Siegrist, J. Social productivity and well-being of older people: Baseline results from the SHARE study. Eur. J. Ageing 2006, 3, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. McMunn, A.; Nazroo, J.; Wahrendorf, M.; Breeze, E.; Zaninotto, P. Participation in socially-productive activities, reciprocity and wellbeing in later life: Baseline results in England. Ageing Soc. 2009, 29, 765–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Hori, M.; Kamo, Y. Gender differences in happiness: The effects of marriage, social roles, and social support in East Asia. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2018, 13, 839–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tsai, M.C.; Dzorgbo, D.B.S. Familial reciprocity and subjective well-being in Ghana. J. Marriage Fam. 2012, 74, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tomini, F.; Groot, W.; Tomini, S.M. Informal care and gifts to and from older people in Europe: The interlinks between giving and receiving. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2016, 16, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Baltes, P.B.; Lindenberger, U.; Staudinger, U.M. Life span theory in developmental psychology. In Handbook of Child Psychology: Volume 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development; Damon, W., Lerner, R.M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 569–664. [Google Scholar]
  87. Wagner, M.; Schütze, Y.; Lang, F.R. Social relationships in old age. In The Berlin Aging Study—Aging from 70 to 100; Baltes, P.B., Mayer, K.U., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999; pp. 282–301. [Google Scholar]
  88. Chen, X.P.; Eberly, M.B.; Chiang, T.J.; Farh, J.L.; Cheng, B.S. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. J. Manag. 2014, 40, 796–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, P.L.; Tsai, Y.L.; Lin, M.H.; Wang, J. Gender differences in health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly. J. Women Aging 2018, 30, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Arber, S.; Fenn, K.; Meadows, R. Subjective financial well-being, income and health inequalities in mid and later life in Britain. Soc. Sci. Med. 2014, 100, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhao, L.Y.; Zhang, K.; Gao, Y.; Jia, Z.H.; Han, S.Y. The relationship between gender, marital status and depression among Chinese middle-aged and older people: Mediation by subjective well-being and moderation by degree of digitization. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 923597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Craft, B.J.; Grasser, S.C. The relationship of reciprocity to self-health care in older women. J. Women Aging 1998, 10, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 19 16367 g001 550
Figure 1. Mediation model of older men in Chengdu. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Mediation model of older men in Chengdu. *** p < 0.001.
Ijerph 19 16367 g001
Ijerph 19 16367 g002 550
Figure 2. Mediation model of older women in Chengdu. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Mediation model of older women in Chengdu. *** p < 0.001.
Ijerph 19 16367 g002
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables.
VariablesPercentage/Mean Value (Standard Deviation) (%)
Men
n = 131		Women
n = 166
SWB3.743.70
Age
60–6936.744.0
70–7945.141.0
80 or above18.215.1
Educational attainment
Primary school and below35.741.6
Middle and high school37.435.5
College education or above26.922.9
Self-rated health status
Unhealthy10.412.7
Average53.551.8
Healthy36.035.5
Whether living with children or not
Yes34.041.0
No64.657.2
No children1.31.8
Income status
≤3000 RMB70.780.7
3001–4999 RMB22.215.1
≥5000 RMB7.14.2
Self-rated socioeconomic status
Lower48.550.0
Average51.550.0
Higher
Table
Table 2. Correlations between social participation, reciprocity beliefs, and SWB of older men.
Table 2. Correlations between social participation, reciprocity beliefs, and SWB of older men.
VariablesSocial ParticipationReciprocity BeliefsSWB
Social participation-
Reciprocity beliefs0.429 ***-
SWB0.515 ***0.638 ***-
*** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 3. Correlations between social participation, reciprocity beliefs, and SWB of older women.
Table 3. Correlations between social participation, reciprocity beliefs, and SWB of older women.
VariablesSocial ParticipationReciprocity BeliefsSWB
Social participation-
Reciprocity beliefs0.371 ***-
SWB0.418 ***0.501 ***-
*** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 4. Multiple linear regression analysis results in older men.
Table 4. Multiple linear regression analysis results in older men.
VariablesReciprocity BeliefsSWB
Model 1Model 2Model 1Model 2Model 3
Age−0.155−0.181 *−0.137−0.1340.134 *
Educational attainment−0.224 *−0.257 *−0.0630.0030.022
Self-rated health status0.0700.0110.201 *0.149 *0.134 *
Whether living with children or not0.010−0.0270.0640.0930.020
Income status0.1260.1550.1130.0730.105
Self-rated socioeconomic0.184 *0.0910.232 *0.158 *0.105
Social participation 0.401 *** 0.425 ***0.320 **
Reciprocity beliefs 0.317 ***
SWB
R20.0520.1990.0990.2800.357
∆R20.095 *0.1470.1400.1520.078
F2.182 *5.611 ***3.368 **10.167 ***12.471 ***
∆F2.182 *23.780 ***3.368 **34.901 ***20.030 ***
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 5. Multiple linear regression analysis results in older women.
Table 5. Multiple linear regression analysis results in older women.
VariablesReciprocity BeliefsSWB
Model 1Model 2Model 1Model 2Model 3
Age−0.08−0.0010.033−0.164 *−0.096
Educational attainment−0.083−0.062−0.025−0.0970.000
Self-rated health status0.1090.0480.228 **0.1390.135
Whether living with children or not0.252 **0.230 **0.1210.0260.036
Income status−0.031−0.1010.1630.1430.085
Self-rated socioeconomic0.191 *0.167 *0.188 *0.1350.101
Social participation 0.329 *** 0.419 ***0.268 **
Reciprocity beliefs 0.377 ***
SWB
R20.1010.1910.1260.2600.369
∆R20.1340.0910.1580.160 ***0.108 ***
F4.088 **6.548 ***4.982 ***7.530 ***10.494 ***
∆F4.088 **18.597 ***4.982 ***28.086 ***22.173 ***
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Table
Table 6. Summary of mediating results of older men.
Table 6. Summary of mediating results of older men.
95% Confidence Interval
VariablesEffectSEp ValueLLCIULCI
Indirect effect
 SP→RB→SWB0.0860.030 0.0390.155
Direct effect
 SP→SWB0.1530.0460.0010.0630.243
Total effect
 SP→SWB0.2390.0450.0000.1500.329
Abbreviations: SP, social participation; RB, reciprocity beliefs; SWB, subjective well-being.
Table
Table 7. Summary of mediating results of older women.
Table 7. Summary of mediating results of older women.
95% Confidence Interval
VariablesEffectSEp ValueLLCIULCI
Indirect effect
 SP→RB→SWB0.0540.018 0.0240.094
Direct effect
 SP→SWB0.1660.0370.0000.0930.240
Total effect
 SP→SWB0.2200.0370.0000.1500.329
Abbreviations: SP, social participation; RB, reciprocity beliefs; SWB, subjective well-being.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, X.; Shek, D.T.L.; Du, W.; Pan, Y.; Ma, Y. The Relationship between Social Participation and Subjective Well-Being among Older People in the Chinese Culture Context: The Mediating Effect of Reciprocity Beliefs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316367

AMA Style

He X, Shek DTL, Du W, Pan Y, Ma Y. The Relationship between Social Participation and Subjective Well-Being among Older People in the Chinese Culture Context: The Mediating Effect of Reciprocity Beliefs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):16367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316367

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Xinyu, Daniel T. L. Shek, Wenbin Du, Yangu Pan, and Yin Ma. 2022. "The Relationship between Social Participation and Subjective Well-Being among Older People in the Chinese Culture Context: The Mediating Effect of Reciprocity Beliefs" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 16367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop