Next Article in Journal
Conflicting HIV/AIDS Sex Education Policies and Mixed Messaging among Educators and Students in the Lower Manya Krobo Municipality, Ghana
Previous Article in Journal
Structured Observations of Child Behaviors during a Mastery-Motivational Climate Motor Skill Intervention: An Exploratory Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 23
10.3390/ijerph192315486
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Protocol

Intermittent Use of Anti-Hormonal Agents for the Endocrine Therapy of Sex-Hormone-Dependent Breast and Prostate Cancer: A Protocol for a Systematic Review

by
Dorothea Kesztyüs
*,
Johanna Kämpfer
and
Tibor Kesztyüs
Medical Data Integration Centre, Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Centre, Georg-August University Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15486; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315486
Submission received: 22 September 2022 / Revised: 10 November 2022 / Accepted: 19 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Therapies with the continuous administration of anti-hormonal agents in sex-hormone-dependent malignancies such as prostate and breast carcinomas often lead to the development of resistant tumor cells. A systematic evaluation of the use and effects of the intermittent application of endocrine therapy could provide information on the state of knowledge in this research area. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science will be systematically searched using pretested search strategies. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, pragmatic trials, case–control, and comparative cohort studies will be eligible. Primary outcomes will be progression-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The literature retrieved will be selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant data will be extracted from included references into a pre-designed table. The risk of bias will be assessed, and the report of the results will follow PRISMA recommendations and include any deviations from this protocol. The increasing prevalence of breast and prostate cancer and limitations of current therapeutic approaches require a closer look at alternatives. Additionally, to explore new therapeutic agents, modalities of administration should be rigorously reviewed to determine the best regimens for patients. This proposed systematic review aims to summarize and evaluate the current knowledge regarding intermittent endocrine cancer therapy to provide a basis for further research.

1. Introduction

In high-income countries, a transition is emerging from cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of mortality to deaths from cancer among adults aged 35–70 years [1]. Based on data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), cancer incidence is supposed to increase from 19.3 million in 2020 to 30.3 million in 2040 worldwide for all age groups [2]. The IARC also reports that female breast cancer was the most commonly diagnosed cancer in 2020, surpassing lung cancer for the first time, followed by prostate cancer in third place [3]. An estimated worldwide increase of 1.5% annually in the number of new cases of female breast cancer, from 2.3 million in 2020 to 3.2 million in 2040, mainly due to demographic changes, is expected [2]. The incidence of prostate cancer is estimated to grow from 1.4 million in 2020 to 2.4 million in 2040 [2]. This increase will also affect regions with a high and very high human development index (HDI), where the estimation for breast cancer incidence rises from 1.83 to 2.3 million, and for prostate cancer, from 1.3 to 1.9 million from 2020 to 2040 [2]. Male breast cancer is a rather rare diagnosis, affecting less than 1% of all breast cancer cases, but with increasing incidence worldwide [4]. Moreover, its incidence is expected to increase further due to the spread of obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome as prominent risk factors [5].
Against this background, a detailed exploration of therapeutic options is indicated, especially for these common sex-specific cancers.

1.1. Sex-Hormone-Dependent Malignancies

Most breast cancers and almost all initial prostate cancers are hormone-dependent in that their growth and proliferation depend on a specific nuclear receptor (NR) for androgen or estrogen [6].
In a French study with 2020 women, at least more than half of the cancers were estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) with an increasing tendency and growing ER+ levels from perimenopause to postmenopause [7]. Regarding the progesterone receptor status, more cancers were receptor positive (PgR+) in premenopausal than in peri- or postmenopausal women, and levels of PgR+ decreased with menopausal status [7]. Additionally, the Nurses Health Study revealed that 77% of invasive female breast cancers were androgen-receptor (AR)-positive [8].
Although specific research is sparse, it is obvious that male breast cancer differs significantly from the female form, including a higher rate of ER+ tumor entities in the vast majority of reported cases. Additionally, androgen receptors are expressed in most male breast cancers [4]. In comparison, male breast cancer shows more parallels to female postmenopausal breast cancer than to premenopausal cancer, especially in terms of the age–frequency distribution [9]. However, the most common sex-hormone-dependent malignancy in men is prostate cancer, meaning that most are androgen-dependent, at least initially [10]. The hormonal dependency is of particular importance for treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), primarily applied in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic stages of prostate cancer, but the AR frequently changes in the course of this therapy [11,12].
Since the interaction of sex hormones and their respective receptors is essential for the development of sex-hormone-dependent malignancies, female and male breast cancer and prostate cancer are frequently treated with anti-hormonal agents [13,14].

1.2. Side Effects, Quality of Life, and Adherence

Endocrine therapy has many side effects and therefore compromises patients’ quality of life in many dimensions and impacts their adherence to treatment [12,15,16].
According to a systematic review, adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among patients with breast cancer ranged from 41 to 72%, and discontinuation ranged from 31 to 73% after five years of treatment [17]. There have been reports of differences between men and women in adherence to tamoxifen, a commonly prescribed selective ER modulator in breast cancer, with men showing lower tolerance to side effects and a higher likeliness of discontinuation [5]. Reported side effects included sexual dysfunction, weight gain, hot flashes, and mood alterations [5]. Adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for early female breast cancer was found to be associated with several adverse effects involving vasomotor, musculoskeletal, and vulvovaginal function, as well as cardiovascular and cognitive dysfunction and fatigue [15]. Therefore, quality of life deteriorates, and adherence decreases substantially. The authors of this review conclude that common side effects are underestimated, and the resulting lack of adherence can lead to worsening treatment outcomes, which should be prevented by offering patients available therapeutic approaches that mitigate the toxicity [15].
ADT in prostate cancer patients has many side effects, which may compromise the quality of life and require additional medication [12]. For instance, ADT increases the risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, and metabolic disturbances can impair mental health and cognitive performance and lead to hot flashes, the most commonly complained side effect [12]. Novel non-steroidal anti-androgen agents for prostate cancer were found to be associated with increases in neurologic side effects such as falls and asthenia but not with a significant increase in treatment discontinuation due to adverse events [18]. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy worsened the side effects of radiotherapy or brachytherapy and compromised quality of life across multiple domains in a retrospective analysis of prostate cancer treatment outcomes [19].

1.3. Resistance to Anti-Hormonal Therapy and Rationale for a New Systematic Review

Sex-hormone-dependent cancers require specific NRs, which are the respective targets for anti-hormonal agents [6]. Therapy with the continuous administration of anti-hormonal agents in hormone-sensitive malignancies, above all prostate and breast carcinomas, can lead to the development of resistance in tumor cells and thus make the anti-hormonal therapy less effective [20,21]. In a study of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, virtually all participants under the continuous application of tamoxifen developed resistance during the observation period [22]. In another study of advanced prostate cancer, the median time to relapse was 33 months in non-metastatic and 16 months in metastatic patients [23]. Therefore, the development of resistance is a major risk in endocrine therapy of primary-hormone-sensitive prostate and breast cancer. Several studies and reviews indicate that the intermittent use of anti-hormonal agents may be able to reverse or completely prevent resistance and is not inferior to the continuous application but may lead to fewer side effects, improved quality of life, and better compliance [24,25,26,27]. Especially for breast cancer, drug holidays in endocrine therapy could offer new therapeutic possibilities for reducing recurrence and mortality [28,29].
The introduction of new therapeutics and the paucity of systematic reviews, especially for breast cancer, make it necessary to conduct a new systematic review of intermittent endocrine therapy for sex-hormone-dependent malignancies to reflect the current state of knowledge and research. In addition to the primary outcomes of progression-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival as important cancer- and therapy-specific outcomes critical for decision making, the secondary outcome (time to) resistance to endocrine agents was included. Further secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival, loco-regional control, side effects, adherence, and patient-reported quality of life, which are more patient-centered.
In preparing this protocol, a search of PROSPERO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Systematic Review Register, and the Open Science Framework (OSF) registries was conducted in December 2021 to determine if there were any previously registered protocols on the topic.

1.4. Aim and Objectives

The “Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison/Control, Outcome, Study design” statement (PICOS) was applied to frame the research question.
  • P Patients with potentially sex-hormone-dependent malignancies receiving anti-hormonal therapy.
  • I Intermittent or periodic administration of anti-hormonal substances (therapeutic intervals, drug holiday, alternating adherence).
  • C Continuous administration of anti-hormonal substances.
  • O Progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival.
  • S Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, pragmatic clinical trials, case–control studies, and comparative cohort studies.
Hence, we expect this systematic review to answer the following research question:
Are there any relevant differences in outcomes between intermittent and continuous endocrine therapy with anti-hormonal agents in potentially sex-hormone-dependent malignancies?
In addition to the primary research question, information on the quality of life, time to drug resistance, side effects, and adherence was considered. Finally, yet importantly, a comprehensive overview of the current scientific knowledge regarding intermittent ant-hormonal therapy for major sex-hormone-dependent malignancies is given.

2. Materials and Methods

The preparation of this systematic review protocol is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines [30]. The respective checklist can be found as supplementary material (see S1, PRISMA-P Checklist). As far as possible, the proposed systematic review follows the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [31]. The protocol is registered at the International prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO (CRD42022312568, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, accessed on 26 March 2022).

2.1. Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to the titles, abstracts, and articles retrieved in the systematic literature search are depicted in detail in Table 1.

2.2. Search Strategy

An initial limited search based on the PICOS key elements and eligibility criteria, as reported above, was undertaken in PubMed, the Cochrane Library (CDSR and CENTRAL), and Embase (via OVID) to identify articles on the topic. The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles and the database-specific index terms of the articles were used to develop a preliminary full search strategy for PubMed, with special consideration of the tree structure, and according to the PRESS specifications [32]. This search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms as shown in Table 2, was customized for each database and/or information source to be searched. The electronic database search included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase via Ovid, and Web of Science. The time period of publications to include was not limited. Sources of gray literature included OpenGrey via Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), Pro-Quest for dissertations and theses, and ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) for unpublished studies. The reference list of all included publications was screened for additional studies. In order to obtain the greatest possible completeness, the systematic reviews found in the literature search were checked to see whether the included studies were included in our reference list or could still be included subsequently.

2.3. Data Management and Selection

After completion of the search process, all identified references were compiled and uploaded into RefWorks, automatically checked for duplicates, and the duplicates were removed. After a pilot test of 25 randomly selected titles/abstracts and a review and refinement or adjustment of the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers using the final inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1). The publications that scored positively in this title/abstract scan were included and subsequently obtained in full text, which was also evaluated in detail by two independent reviewers according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The reasons for excluding references that did not meet the inclusion criteria at the title/abstract and full-text level were documented and provided in the systematic review report. Any disagreements that may arise between the reviewers at any stage of the selection process will be resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer. The results of the search and the inclusion and exclusion procedure of all references will be fully reported in the final version of the systematic review and presented in a PRISMA flow diagram [33].

2.4. Data Extraction and Risk of Bias Assessment

Data from the references included in the selection process were extracted by one researcher (J.K.) into a predefined data extraction table, which was developed and tested in advance and controlled by a second (D.K.). The extracted data contained specific information related to the PICOS elements, study methods, and key outcomes relevant to the objectives of the review. The customized data extraction table is divided into categories of content-linked fields related to specific data regarding publication, study design and participants, intervention and control, and overall assessment. This draft extraction form, which can be modified and updated as needed during the process of data extraction from each included source, is provided (see S2). Any changes to this version were delineated in the final report of the systematic review. Disagreements that arise between the reviewers during the process of data extraction will be resolved by discussion or another reviewer, as before. If necessary, further information will be sought in other publications of the particular study or in a published protocol, or the authors of the articles will be contacted to obtain missing or additional data.
To determine the quality of the evidence of included references, a comprehensive risk of bias assessment was conducted. Following a joint training session based on the knowledge of an experienced reviewer, the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) Tool was applied for RCTs [34], and the ROBIN-I tool was applied for non-randomized studies [35]. The RoB 2 assesses bias in five domains leading to an overall risk of bias judgments of “low”, “some concerns”, or “high risk” for RCTs [34]. The ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies includes seven domains and a judgment of the respective risk of bias, which is carried forward to an overall risk of bias from “low” to “critical” and “no information” [35].

2.5. Data Analysis and Presentation

A comprehensive description and the PRISMA flow diagram provide a detailed overview of the selection process of all included sources. To reach the overarching aim of giving a comprehensive overview of the current scientific knowledge regarding intermittent anti-hormonal therapy, the data are presented in a hierarchically structured manner. On the first level, descriptive statistics and their graphical representations will be applied to quantify the distribution of publications across cancer entities and, if required, sub-sections. The second level includes the different study designs, e.g., RCTs and non-randomized trials. Results will be presented in summary tables that include more detailed information on specifics of each study, outcomes, conclusions, and risk of bias. Further information will be given in a narrative form. For RCTs, the feasibility of a meta-analysis will be assessed and, if enough studies with sufficient data are available, this will be completed while taking into account the results of the risk of bias assessment for eligible studies, i.e., those RCTs published in the period between the latest inclusion date of the most recently published meta-analysis and the final date of our systematic literature search. In particular, with regard to ADT in prostate cancer, such a meta-analysis seemed to be possible due to the more frequent use of intermittent therapy regimens and the existence of previous meta-analyses [26,36]. Sufficient data provided, a meta-analysis will be performed for the primary outcomes of overall survival and progression-free survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) regarding intermittent ADT versus continuous ADT will either be extracted from the included studies or estimated from published data [37]. Based on homogeneity of study results, either a fixed-effect model with inverse variance-weighted confidence intervals or a random-effects analysis with weighted method is applied. The I2 statistic will quantify heterogeneity, and a sensitivity analysis has been planned considering the risk of bias estimates and studies with results on the margins of the result field. A funnel plot will provide an estimate of the publication bias for included studies. Finally, the quality of the body of evidence will be assessed by applying the specific evidence grading system of the GRADE Working Group [38]. The meta-analysis will be performed using the package “metafor” for R (https://cran.r-project.org/, accessed on 30 March 2022) according to the manual of Viechtbauer [39].

3. Handling the Results

The presentation of results follows the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews [33]. Finally, any deviation from this protocol is reported with an explanation in the publication of the results.

Dissemination of Results

The dissemination of the results takes place in a variety of ways, foremost through publication in an open access journal, but also through conference proceedings and lectures. In addition, this systematic review shall serve to open up new research foci with regard to intermittent anti-hormonal therapy: where there is a lack of data (e.g., HRQoL, adherence), where can the use of intermittent therapy usefully replace or extend the continuous use, how the use of intermittent therapy can be offered to reduce the number of treatment dropouts, and how the cost-effectiveness compared to continuous use.

4. Discussion

Although ethical approval is not required for this work, ethical medicine obligates us to put the patient’s welfare first and carefully consider therapeutic alternatives and compare them to current standards. This is especially the case when standard procedures have many side effects and therefore impact the quality of life.
In addition to investing in new therapeutics, science should also focus on the application of existing and proven therapies. Overall survival and disease-specific survival are the most important measures underlying cancer research. Proven therapies are predominantly well-studied in this regard; therefore, therapeutic targets focusing on patient well-being can now be addressed. These primarily include patient-related outcomes such as HRQoL, which can also be assumed to interact with the side-effect profile to affect treatment adherence.
The intermittent application of anti-hormonal agents has several possible advantages, such as fewer side effects, improved health-related quality of life, and better adherence [24,25,26,27]. While little is known to date about intermittent therapy in breast cancer, most current knowledge comes from studies on prostate cancer. For better adherence, intermittent application of endocrine therapy should be considered, especially in breast cancer patients. Rates of discontinuation regarding anti-hormonal therapy in women with breast cancer reach levels as high as 73%, necessitating an increased search for alternative therapy regimens [17,25]. Although the presumably only currently known randomized controlled trial with intermittent administration of aromatase inhibitors failed to demonstrate significant differences in adverse effects, the absence of evidence should not be taken as evidence of absence.
The systematic review presented in this protocol is designed to identify the current scientific evidence on intermittent anti-hormonal therapy in the most prevalent sex-specific malignancies, which pose an immense burden on public health and healthcare systems worldwide [40]. It is impossible to present a complete picture of the available information on this subject, so it must be assumed that this review can only present a limited excerpt. The focus on RCTs in high-quality systematic reviews cannot reflect the situation in everyday life that affects millions of people with cancer. However, a review can provide evidence-based information that can then be integrated into everyday decisions and improve care for affected people in a more patient-centered way.

5. Conclusions

Both breast cancer and prostate cancer are predominantly dependent on sex hormones for their development. Anti-hormonal therapy often leads to the emergence of resistant cancer cells in both prostate and breast cancer. While intermittent endocrine therapy has found its way into the guidelines for the treatment of prostate cancer, there have been no efforts to date in this regard for the treatment of breast cancer. This systematic literature review intends to provide as comprehensive a picture as possible of the respective current state of research and, at best, to encourage an impetus for further research, particularly in the area of breast cancer.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph192315486/s1, S1: PRISMA-P 2015 Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist for the development of a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis; S2: Draft extraction form.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K.; methodology, D.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, J.K. and T.K.; supervision, T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dagenais, G.R.; Leong, D.P.; Rangarajan, S.; Lanas, F.; Lopez-Jaramillo, P.; Gupta, R.; Diaz, R.; Avezum, A.; Oliveira, G.B.F.; Wielgosz, A.; et al. Variations in common diseases, hospital admissions, and deaths in middle-aged adults in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): A prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC. Cancer Tomorrow. A Tool That Predicts the Future Cancer Incidence and Mortality Burden Worldwide from the Current Estimates in 2020 up until 2040. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/en (accessed on 25 August 2022).
  3. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fox, S.; Speirs, V.; Shaaban, A.M. Male breast cancer: An update. Virchows Arch. 2021, 480, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fentiman, I.S. The endocrinology of male breast cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2018, 25, R365–R373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Blatt, E.B.; Kopplin, N.; Kumar, S.; Mu, P.; Conzen, S.D.; Raj, G.V. Overcoming oncogene addiction in breast and prostate cancers: A comparative mechanistic overview. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2021, 28, R31–R46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pujol, P.; Daures, J.P.; Thezenas, S.; Guilleux, F.; Rouanet, P.; Grenier, J. Changing estrogen and progesterone receptor patterns in breast carcinoma during the menstrual cycle and menopause. Cancer 1998, 83, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Collins, L.C.; Cole, K.S.; Marotti, J.D.; Hu, R.; Schnitt, S.J.; Tamimi, R.M. Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer in relation to molecular phenotype: Results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Anderson, W.F.; Althuis, M.D.; Brinton, L.A.; Devesa, S.S. Is male breast cancer similar or different than female breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2004, 83, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kamada, S.; Takeiwa, T.; Ikeda, K.; Horie-Inoue, K.; Inoue, S. Long Non-coding RNAs Involved in Metabolic Alterations in Breast and Prostate Cancers. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fujita, K.; Nonomura, N. Role of Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer: A Review. World J. Mens Health 2019, 37, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shore, N.D.; Antonarakis, E.S.; Cookson, M.S.; Crawford, E.D.; Morgans, A.K.; Albala, D.M.; Hafron, J.; Harris, R.G.; Saltzstein, D.; Do, G.A.B.; et al. Optimizing the role of androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer: Challenges beyond the guidelines. Prostate 2020, 80, 527–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Folkerd, E.J.; Dowsett, M. Influence of sex hormones on cancer progression. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 4038–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ulm, M.; Ramesh, A.V.; McNamara, K.M.; Ponnusamy, S.; Sasano, H.; Narayanan, R. Therapeutic advances in hormone-dependent cancers: Focus on prostate, breast and ovarian cancers. Endocr. Connect. 2019, 8, R10–R26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Condorelli, R.; Vaz-Luis, I. Managing side effects in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2018, 18, 1101–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gay, H.A.; Sanda, M.G.; Liu, J.; Wu, N.; Hamstra, D.A.; Wei, J.T.; Dunn, R.L.; Klein, E.A.; Sandler, H.M.; Saigal, C.S.; et al. External Beam Radiation Therapy or Brachytherapy With or Without Short-course Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective Study of Quality of Life. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2017, 98, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Murphy, C.C.; Bartholomew, L.K.; Carpentier, M.Y.; Bluethmann, S.M.; Vernon, S.W. Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among breast cancer survivors in clinical practice: A systematic review. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 134, 459–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bakouny, Z.; Yekedüz, E.; Braun, D.A.; Berchuck, J.E.; Hirsch, L.; Utkan, G.; Lee, Y.; Trinh, Q.-D.; Choueiri, T.K.; Ürün, Y. Neurotoxicities of novel non-steroidal anti-androgens for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2021, 166, 103463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanda, M.G.; Dunn, R.L.; Michalski, J.; Sandler, H.M.; Northouse, L.; Hembroff, L.; Lin, X.; Greenfield, T.K.; Litwin, M.S.; Saigal, C.S.; et al. Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Outcome among Prostate-Cancer Survivors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1250–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feng, Q.; He, B. Androgen Receptor Signaling in the Development of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hanker, A.B.; Sudhan, D.R.; Arteaga, C.L. Overcoming Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer. Cancer Cell 2020, 37, 496–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Beex, L.; Rose, C.; Mouridsen, H.; Jassem, J.; Nooij, M.; Estape, J.; Paridaens, R.; Piccart, M.; Gorlia, T.; Lardenoije, S.; et al. Continuous versus intermittent tamoxifen versus intermittent/alternated tamoxifen and medroxyprogesterone acetate as first line endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer: An EORTC phase III study (10863). Eur. J. Cancer 2006, 42, 3178–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ross, R.W.; Xie, W.; Regan, M.M.; Pomerantz, M.; Nakabayashi, M.; Daskivich, T.J.; Sartor, O.; Taplin, M.-E.; Kantoff, P.W.; Oh, W.K. Efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Association between gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, and prior ADT exposure with duration of ADT effect. Cancer 2008, 112, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Balduzzi, A.; Bagnardi, V.; Sandri, M.T.; Dellapasqua, S.; Cardillo, A.; Montagna, E.; Cancello, G.; Iorfida, M.; Ghisini, R.; Viale, G.; et al. Intermittent Letrozole Administration as Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Biologic Study. Clin. Breast Cancer 2015, 15, e257–e262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Engel, J.; Schubert-Fritschle, G.; Emeny, R.; Hölzel, D. Breast cancer: Are long-term and intermittent endocrine therapies equally effective? J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 146, 2041–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Magnan, S.; Zarychanski, R.; Pilote, L.; Bernier, L.; Shemilt, M.; Vigneault, E.; Fradet, V.; Turgeon, A.F. Intermittent vs. continuous androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ribi, K.; Luo, W.; Colleoni, M.; Karlsson, P.; Chirgwin, J.; Aebi, S.; Jerusalem, G.; Neven, P.; Di Lauro, V.; Gomez, H.L.; et al. Quality of life under extended continuous versus intermittent adjuvant letrozole in lymph node-positive, early breast cancer patients: The SOLE randomised phase 3 trial. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Abderrahman, B.; Jordan, V.C. Rethinking extended adjuvant antiestrogen therapy to increase survivorship in breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 15–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maximov, P.Y.; Abderrahman, B.; Curpan, R.F.; Hawsawi, Y.M.; Fan, P.; Jordan, V.C. A unifying biology of sex steroid-induced apoptosis in prostate and breast cancers. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2018, 25, R83–R113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd ed.; Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., Welch, V.A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. McGowan, J.; Sampson, M.; Salzwedel, D.M.; Cogo, E.; Foerster, V.; Lefebvre, C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2016, 75, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sterne, J.A.C.; Savović, J.; Page, M.J.; Elbers, R.G.; Blencowe, N.S.; Boutron, I.; Cates, C.J.; Cheng, H.Y.; Corbett, M.S.; Eldridge, S.M.; et al. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019, 366, l4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sterne, J.A.; Hernán, M.A.; Reeves, B.C.; Savović, J.; Berkman, N.D.; Viswanathan, M.; Henry, D.; Altman, D.G.; Ansari, M.T.; Boutron, I.; et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016, 355, i4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Niraula, S.; Le, L.W.; Tannock, I.F. Treatment of prostate cancer with intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation: A systematic review of randomized trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2029–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tierney, J.F.; Stewart, L.A.; Ghersi, D.; Burdett, S.; Sydes, M.R. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2007, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Balshem, H.; Helfand, M.; Schünemann, H.J.; Oxman, A.D.; Kunz, R.; Brozek, J.; Vist, G.E.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Meerpohl, J.; Norris, S.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 2010, 36, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fitzmaurice, C.; Abate, D.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdel-Rahman, O.; Abdelalim, A.; Abdoli, A.; Abdollahpour, I.; Abdulle, A.S.M.; et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-Adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 1749–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Structured overview of inclusion and exclusion criteria according to the “Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison/Control, Outcome, Study design” (PICOS) approach.
Table 1. Structured overview of inclusion and exclusion criteria according to the “Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison/Control, Outcome, Study design” (PICOS) approach.
InclusionExclusion
Patient/PopulationHuman participants (adults ≥ 18 years of all sexes) with a confirmed diagnosis of breast or prostate cancer at any stage, with or without known resistance to anti-hormonal therapy and without restriction to previous or current application of other therapeutic agents.Children, animal, or in vitro testing.
InterventionIntermittent or periodic application of anti-hormonal therapy targeting sex-specific hormones, their respective receptors, releasing hormones or enzymes for the synthesis from precursors: agonists, antagonists, inhibitors, receptor modulators, and degraders, anti-hormonal agents.
An intermittent or periodic application should include at least one break (tb) of either predetermined length or with fixed criteria to stop and/or restart the application (ta). For breaks of predetermined length, ta ≥ tb is applied.
Reports of intermittent application due to failure of adherence are not excluded but handled separately. An observation period of at least 18 months is required.		Non-sex-hormone-targeted therapeutics: chemotherapeutic agents, immunotherapeutics, mTOR inhibitors, HER2-therapeutics, CDK4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, etc.
Comparison/ControlContinuous application of anti-hormonal therapy.
OutcomePrimary outcomes: progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival.
Secondary outcomes: cancer-specific survival, loco-regional control, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), time to drug resistance, side effects, adherence.		Studies will not be excluded due to missing outcomes, but the results will be reported separately.
Study types/
Publication		Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, non-randomized controlled trials, case–control studies, controlled before–after studies, longitudinal comparative cohort trials (observational study design).
Publication language is restricted to English and German.
No restriction to the time period of publication.		Cross-sectional studies, case reports, case series, qualitative studies, modeling studies.
SettingNo restrictions to types of settings.
Table
Table 2. PubMed search strategy based on the PICOS statement and inclusion/exclusion criteria, executed on 12 January 2022.
Table 2. PubMed search strategy based on the PICOS statement and inclusion/exclusion criteria, executed on 12 January 2022.
StepSearch StringResults
#1“neoplasms, hormone dependent/drug therapy”[MeSH Terms:noexp] OR “prostatic neoplasms/drug therapy”[MeSH Terms] OR “breast neoplasms/drug therapy”[MeSH Terms]96,675
#2“drug resistance, neoplasm”[MeSH Terms] OR “androgen antagonists/therapeutic use”[MeSH Terms] OR “gonadotropin releasing hormone/agonists”[MeSH Terms] OR “estrogen antagonists/therapeutic use”[MeSH Terms] OR “estrogen receptor modulators/therapeutic use”[MeSH Terms] OR “anticarcinogenic agents/therapeutic use”[MeSH Terms] OR “antineoplastic agents, hormonal/therapeutic use “[MeSH Terms] OR “antineoplastic agents, hormonal/antagonists and inhibitors”[MeSH Terms] OR “chemoprevention”[MeSH Terms:noexp]97,743
#3#1 and #222,161
#4“clinical protocols”[MeSH Terms] OR “drug administration schedule”[MeSH Terms] OR “drug tapering”[MeSH Terms] OR “time factors”[MeSH Terms] OR “patient compliance”[MeSH Terms]1,545,304
#5“intermittent*”[Title/Abstract] OR “sequent*” [Title/Abstract] OR “periodic*”[Title/Abstract] OR “drug holiday*”[Title/Abstract] OR “therapy persistence”[Title/Abstract]418,847
#6#4 or #51,926,728
#7“treatment failure”[MeSH Terms:noexp] OR “survival analysis”[MeSH Terms] OR “recurrence”[MeSH Terms:noexp]534,832
#8#3 and #6 and #71445
#9#8 AND ((classicalarticle[Filter] OR clinicaltrial[Filter] OR controlledclinicaltrial[Filter] OR guideline[Filter] OR meta-analysis[Filter] OR observationalstudy[Filter] OR pragmaticclinicaltrial[Filter] OR randomizedcontrolledtrial[Filter] OR review[Filter] OR systematicreview[Filter]) AND (humans[Filter]) AND (english[Filter] OR german[Filter]) AND (alladult[Filter]))583
Note. MeSH medical subject heading, # number.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kesztyüs, D.; Kämpfer, J.; Kesztyüs, T. Intermittent Use of Anti-Hormonal Agents for the Endocrine Therapy of Sex-Hormone-Dependent Breast and Prostate Cancer: A Protocol for a Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315486

AMA Style

Kesztyüs D, Kämpfer J, Kesztyüs T. Intermittent Use of Anti-Hormonal Agents for the Endocrine Therapy of Sex-Hormone-Dependent Breast and Prostate Cancer: A Protocol for a Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):15486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315486

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kesztyüs, Dorothea, Johanna Kämpfer, and Tibor Kesztyüs. 2022. "Intermittent Use of Anti-Hormonal Agents for the Endocrine Therapy of Sex-Hormone-Dependent Breast and Prostate Cancer: A Protocol for a Systematic Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 15486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315486

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop