Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Modular Vertical Greening Shading in Summer
Next Article in Special Issue
Correlation between Cardiopulmonary Indices and Running Performance in a 14.5 km Endurance Running Event
Previous Article in Journal
Roma Religion: 1775 and 2018 Compared over Time
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exe-Muscle: An Exercised Human Skeletal Muscle Gene Expression Database
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 18
10.3390/ijerph191811638
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effects of Foam Rolling Training on Performance Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis including Controlled and Randomized Controlled Trials

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811638
by Andreas Konrad 1,2, Masatoshi Nakamura 3 and David George Behm 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Kasidid Ruksakiet
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Wansuk Choi
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811638
Submission received: 8 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 15 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Muscle Responses and Adaptation in Exercise, Sport and Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The comment can be found in attached pdf file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

See attached file.

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors are advised to consult the PRISMA 2020 Declaration, in its updated version for systematic reviews, to at least mention it in the text and check whether there have been any substantial changes. It is also recommended that the authors specify in the text the number of manuscripts obtained after discarding those that do not meet their inclusion and exclusion criteria. Systematic reviews usually give more details in this regard in the written part. However, the flow chart is correct and synthesizes well the results obtained in the search.

These are minor suggestions because in general it is a complete article that clearly describes the objective of the study, its methodology and the results obtained. 

 

Author Response

See attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Authors must find additional literature in Chochrane, EMbase.

Authors should use the new PRISMA Flow Diagram.

Authors must obtain a registered number from an official site such as PROSPERO and describe it in the manisript.

Author should present the results of applying ROB2.

Author Response

See attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

1. You must include P (people or person) in your PICO.

Foam Rolling Training Effects on Performance Parameters. A 2 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis including controlled- 3 and randomized controlled trials

-> Effects of Foam Rolling Training on Performance Parameters (in Healthy Person) : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials 

2. The conclusion should be described in the abstract.

3. Risk of Bias should be presented.

ex)

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Risk-of-bias-of-each-study-included-in-this-meta-analysis-A-Risk-of-bias-summary_fig2_350928444

Back to TopTop