Next Article in Journal
A Qualitative Investigation of the Impact of COVID-19 on United States’ Frontline Health Care Workers and the Perceived Impact on Their Family Members
Next Article in Special Issue
Play–Sleep Nexus in Indonesian Preschool Children before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Lifestyle Factors Associated with Metabolic Syndrome in Urban Cambodia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of Smartphone Use Duration with Physical Fitness among University Students: Focus on Strength and Flexibility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations between Parents’ Digital Media Habits, Engagement, Awareness, and Movement Guidelines among Preschool-Age Children: International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study

1
Graduate School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa 169-8050, Japan
2
Faculty of Sports Science, Sendai University, Shibata 989-1693, Japan
3
National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616, Singapore
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(17), 10484; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710484
Submission received: 1 July 2022 / Revised: 18 August 2022 / Accepted: 20 August 2022 / Published: 23 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sports Science with Children’s Lifestyle and Physical Fitness)

Abstract

:
The 24-hour movement guidelines (24-h MG) recommend behaviors (physical activity, screen time, sleep) to aid appropriate physical and mental development in early childhood. This research examined parents’ digital media habits (DMH), engagement (DME), and awareness (DMA) among parents in relation to their preschool-aged children’s 24-h MG in Japan and identified and compared the modifiable determinants of adherence to 24-h MG in urban and rural regions. This cross-sectional study included 867 participants and data were obtained from the International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study Among Asians and OtheRs (IISSAAR). The results revealed that adherence to weekend screen time recommendations and weekday sleep duration were higher in the urban region. The parents’ digital media variables that predicted moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity physical activity among preschool-aged children were parents’ DME and DMA in the urban regions and parents’ DME in the rural regions. The children’s screen time was significantly associated with parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA in the urban regions and with parents’ DMH and DMA in the rural regions (p < 0.005, p < 0.001, respectively). This study confirmed that parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA are strong predictors of adherence to 24-h MG among preschool-aged children living in both rural and urban regions in Japan.

1. Introduction

Early childhood is an important period for physical and mental growth, during which children adapt to their environment, and this period is reported to have an impact on health behaviors in adulthood [1]. Therefore, during early childhood, promoting regular and adequate physical activity (PA), limiting screen time—defined as time spent watching TV or playing games—as much as possible, and ensuring adequate sleep serve as the basis for establishing a healthy lifestyle [2]. Each of the behaviors (PA, screen time, and sleep duration) recommended in the 24-h MG is repeated daily and routinized and thus can possibly be established as a lifestyle habit in preschool children. It is important to consider all three movement behaviors during a given 24-hour period for health [3]. The 24-hour movement guidelines (24-h MG) are an approach that transitions from single movement behaviors to integrated movement behaviors during the day and offers a new paradigm for thinking about movement behaviors. The three movement behaviors, PA, screen time, and sleep were developed in Canada [4] and disseminated by the World Health Organization (WHO) [5]. Furthermore, the 24-h MG (e.g., high PA, low screen time, adequate sleep) contribute to preschool children’s physical, psychological, and mental health as they develop a stronger immune system [3,6,7]. Nevertheless, many children across the globe do not engage in adequate amounts of moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) [8,9], spend much of their time on screen-viewing [10,11], and sleep late at night or for short durations [12,13]. Such behaviors have been noted to have an adverse impact on the physical and mental health of children [14,15,16]. For these reasons, strategies to boost adherence to the 24-h MG among children are imperative and useful.
With the extensive access to digital media (DM) in recent years, the age at first screen exposure is progressively decreasing [17]. While DM does have benefits for preschool-aged children, such as educational benefits, informational access, social connection, and social support, excessive recreational screen time can have a detrimental impact on health and thus requires appropriate parental mitigation and guidance [18]. Parents’ use of DM is reported to alleviate parenting stress to some extent [19]; however, excessive screen use can negatively affect the health and lifestyles of users [20]. Hence, it is also necessary to investigate whether parents’ attitudes toward the use of DM influence their children’s screen time. Previous studies have revealed that parental participation, practices, and control of the home environment rather than perceived neighborhood factors were important determinants of successful interventions to reduce overweight and obesity in preschool children, and statistically significant changes and consistent association with screen time in children were also found [21,22,23]. Thus, 24-h MG of preschool children could be highly influenced by parents. Therefore, modifying behaviors recommended in the 24-h MG require an examination of parents’ DM habits, participation, and cognitive factors. Unfortunately, such studies are lacking. Furthermore, parenting participation differs considerably depending on the living environment, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors between urban and rural dwelling households; therefore, it is also important to examine parents’ DM factors by rural and urban regions [24,25,26].
This study examined parents’ digital media habits (DMH), engagement (DME), and awareness (DMA) in relation to their preschool-aged children’s 24-h MG and identified the modifiable determinants of adherence to 24-h MG among preschool children living in urban and rural regions of Japan. The research questions are as follows: (i) are there regional differences in children’s 24-h MG? (ii) Does the association between parental’s DM factors and children’s 24-h MG differ across regions?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This is a cross-sectional study, and data were obtained from the International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study Among Asians and OtheRs (IISSAAR) [24,27]. Using the classifications of city, town, and village from the 1947 Japanese Enforcement Decree of Statutes of Local Governments, which were based on (i) population, (ii) number of households, (iii) occupation, and (iv) city facilities, Nishinomiya was chosen for the urban region (population: 487,800, area: 99.96 km²) and Ōhira-mura (population: 5918, area: 60.32 km²) and Tomiya-shi (population: 52,430, area: 49.18 km²) constituted the rural region [25]. In addition, 3 of the 51 nursery schools in Nishinomiya that consented to participate in our study were selected as the urban subjects and 5 of the 9 nursery schools in Ōhira and Tomiya were selected as the rural subjects. Three childcare facilities in Nishinomiya (urban) and five childcare facilities in Ōhira and Tomiya (rural) that completed a questionnaire survey between June and October 2019 were selected via convenience sampling (Japanese childcare center age of use: 0–6 year old). Appropriate assent and consent were obtained from parents and teachers in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki, and data from 867 participants who signed the informed consent form (52.7% boys; 47.3% girls, 67.1% retrieval rate) were analyzed. The study received prior approval from the Sendai University Ethics Committee, Faculty of Sports Science, Japan (SU2019-31), and the equivalent of that from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (IRB 2019-02-036).

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Parents’ Digital Media Factors

The SMALLQ® developed by Chia et al. was used [27] after translating the items into Japanese and discussing with the original authors of SMALLQ® as per the WHO process of cultural adaptation [28]. In the present study, the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of the SMALLQ® was established as 0.71: an acceptable level [29] based upon parent-reported self and child digital media use on the weekday and weekend. The SMALLQ® consisted of 25 questions, including questions on digital media habits of the child and the parent (Segment I), nondigital media behavior of the child (Segment II), and background information on the parent and child (Segment III). To achieve our study purpose, of the 25 items, we extracted only those related to parents and redefined them as follows:
DMH: parents were asked about their digital habits on a typical weekday and weekend. The choices were segregated as used for (i) entertainment and (ii) social networking.
DME: regarding parental co-participation in children’s digital media and physical play, parents were asked to estimate their percent engagement in their child’s total time on weekdays and weekends. An example was given: (i) when your child uses media, estimate the amount of time you are engaged with him/her (e.g., interacting with your child while watching videos together); (ii) estimate the percentage of time you engage with your child in indoor and outdoor physical activity (e.g., playing hide-and-seek together).
DMA: parents were asked to indicate whether they are aware of the three professional guidelines on digital media use by children and if they practiced those guidelines. The guidelines are (i) limit digital media use for children younger than two years, (ii) limit screen time to 1 h per day for children 2–5 years, (iii) introduce only high-quality educational programs for children 18–24 months.

2.2.2. Physical Activity

PA was assessed based on two free-response items on the SMALLQ®: (i) indoor play (e.g., dancing, crawling, playing with concrete manipulative toys); (ii) outdoor physical play (e.g., playing hide-and-seek in a playground). PA was calculated by: Indoor play (hrs) + Outdoor play (hrs) = Total physical activity (hrs). Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was calculated by: Total physical activity (TPA) × average % of MVPA = MVPA (hrs) [27].

2.2.3. Screen Time

Screen time was assessed based on two free-response items about leisure time on the SMALLQ®, and weekdays and weekends were surveyed separately: (i) using media for entertainment (e.g., watching shows, playing games, listening to music); (ii) communicating (e.g., chatting with relatives via Facetime/Skype) [27].

2.2.4. Sleep Duration

Sleep duration was measured using the questions: (i) how many hours does your child sleep at night?; (ii) how long is your child’s nap time? Daily sleep duration was calculated by weekdays and weekends as follows: ((night sleep time + nap time)/2) [16].

2.2.5. 24-hour Movement Guidelines

The following recommendations were used to evaluate the new 24-h MG for preschool children: PA guidelines, 180 min of total PA including 60 min/day of moderate to vigorous PA; screen time guidelines, less than 1 h per day; and sleep duration guidelines, 10–13 h within 24 h [5,30].

2.3. Demographic Factors

Demographic factors included sex, age, height, weight, and BMI z-score for preschool children [31] and parents’ sex, age, height, weight, and BMI. The data were collected from the parents.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data from 867 Japanese preschool children (urban region: 489, rural region: 378) who provided complete information on the study variables were analyzed using three models. First, frequency analyses were conducted to investigate the percentage of preschool children who met the PA guidelines, screen time guidelines, and sleep guidelines or combinations of these guidelines. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate the total duration of MVPA, screen time, and sleep duration for 1 week, including weekdays and weekends, and continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations. Second, independent t-tests were performed to analyze the differences in parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA between urban and rural regions. We used t-tests to examine changes in adherence to the 24-h MG (i.e., PA, screen time, and sleep duration) between urban and rural samples. Third, PA, screen time, and sleep duration were analyzed using a univariate linear regression analysis to analyze the association with each of the 24-h MG parameters in the urban and rural regions. In addition, a multivariate model adjusted for sex, age, and BMI was also used. All variables included in each of the multivariate models were assessed for multicollinearity, which is prevalent among parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA [32]. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

Table 1 compares children’s and parents’ characteristics between regions. Among children, 52.7% were boys, and 47.3% were girls. The proportion of girls was slightly higher in the urban region. Age was higher in the urban regions (4.6 ± 0.9 years) than in the rural regions (4.5 ± 0.9 years). Body weight and BMI were significantly higher in the rural than in the urban regions (p < 0.001, p < 0.034, respectively). Among parents, the proportion of mothers was higher in the urban regions (93.9%) than in the rural regions (89.2%) (p < 0.017). Parental age and adult obesity were also higher in the urban regions compared to the rural regions (both, p < 0.001).

3.2. Parents’ Digital Media Variables of Urban and Rural

Table 2 shows the mean and standard deviation of DM variables and the regional gap among parents. Regarding parents’ DMH, parents in the rural regions spent a significantly longer time on DM for “Weekend entertainment” and for “Total entertainment for the week” (p < 0.001, p < 0.016, respectively). Regarding parents’ DME, parents in rural regions showed significantly longer “Digital media engagement with their children (weekend)” (p < 0.041). Regarding parents’ DMA, parents in the urban region showed significantly higher awareness regarding “Limiting screen time to 1 h per day for children 2–5 years” and “Introducing only high-quality educational programs for children 18–24 months” (p < 0.038, p < 0.030, respectively) (Table 2).

3.3. Urban and Rural Differences in Children’s 24-h MG

Table 3 shows the differences in PA, screen time, and sleep duration between children living in the urban and rural regions. The mean weekday MVPA was higher among urban children (26.8 ± 31.9 min) than rural children (20.4 ± 38.3 min). However, weekend screen time was higher among rural children (143.7 ± 95.9 min) than urban children (113.6 ± 80.2 min). Regarding adherence to 24-h MG, adherence rates to screen time on the weekend (p < 0.005), and sleep duration during weekdays (p < 0.001), these were higher among urban children than among rural children (Table 3).

3.4. Parents’ Digital Media Variables Associated with 24-h MG in the Urban Regions

In the multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for sex, age, and BMI to analyze the relationship between adherence to 24-h MG and parents’ DM variables, MVPA was positively associated with “Physical play engagement with children,” “Digital media engagement with child,” “Limit digital media use for children younger than 2 years,” and “Limit screen time to 1 h per day for children 2–5 years.” Further, screen time was positively associated with “Entertainment” and negatively associated with “Physical play engagement with children,” “Limit digital media use for children younger than 2 years,” and “Limit screen time to 1 h per day for children 2–5 years” (Table 4).

3.5. Parents’ Digital Media Variables Associated with 24-h MG in the Rural Regions

The same statistical methods were used to analyze the associations between parents’ DM variables with 24-h MG in rural regions. Children’s MVPA was positively associated with “Physical play engagement with child” and “Digital media engagement with child”. Screen time was positively associated with “Entertainment” and negatively associated with “Introducing only high-quality educational programs for children 18–24 months” (Table 5 and Figure 1).

4. Discussion

This research is part of a multinational study called the International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study Among Asians and OtheRs (IISSAAR) that analyzed the parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA in relation to preschool children’s 24-h MG in Japan by region (urban and rural).
First, 24-h MG (MVPA, screen time, sleep duration) of preschool children living in the urban and rural regions in Japan were compared. Weekday MVPA was longer in the urban regions, while screen time on the weekends was longer in the rural regions. Regarding adherence to 24-h MG, adherence to weekend screen time recommendations was higher in the urban regions, and weekday sleep duration was also higher in the urban regions. Although the correlation between the area of residence (regional gap) and movement behavior must be examined to gain a deeper understanding of movement behavior patterns among preschool-aged children [33], relevant research on preschool-aged children is relatively lacking compared to research in older age groups of children. In a Mozambique study on elementary school students, rural children demonstrated higher adherence to MVPA, sleep duration, and screen time recommendations [34]. In a study conducted in China, which has a similar culture and lifestyle to that of Korea, elementary school students in urban regions showed higher adherence to MVPA and screen time recommendations, while those in rural regions showed high compliance with sleep duration recommendations [35]. The higher levels of MVPA among urban children in Japan may be attributed to the presumably easier access to community sports programs or sports facilities [36] and higher economic standards of the urban regions; where in such contexts, families with a higher socioeconomic status would be more aware of the locations of recreational facilities and can afford or better utilize the equipment for exercise [35]. In another Asian study, rural children were reported to engage in low levels of PA after school, on holidays, and on weekends, and this supports our findings that PA is significantly correlated with access to facilities and places for outdoor play and PA [37]. There are limited studies that compared the screen time exposure of preschool children between urban and rural regions. A few Western studies showed poor adherence to screen time guidelines among urban children [38,39], while another study showed mixed results [40]. A Japanese study revealed a low compliance to screen time guidelines among rural children [25]. A systematic review showed that rural environments hinder PA among children and adolescents, and instead, can facilitate screen-based sedentary behaviors, with such an influence more evident in preschool-aged children than in adolescents [41]. A study conducted on children living in rural regions in Japan also showed that perceived neighborhood factors, such as “sidewalks in neighborhood”, “paths for cycles”, and “aesthetic qualities” influenced outdoor exercise time and screen time [25]. These results are consistent with the findings of a Canadian study, where access to public transportation, parks and other green spaces, exercise facilities, and community recreation centers influenced PA [42]. The reasons for such phenomenon are that young children are highly dependent on their parents for activity, and if parents continue to limit outdoor playtime and instead promote activity inside the house or other places that are easily supervised by parents, children may increasingly become more dependent on TV or virtual games when seeking pleasure [43]. One effective means to address these problems and reduce screen time would be for parents to engage in outdoor activities with their children to provide experiences that are essential in early childhood, such as freedom of movement, fun, creativity, and confidence.
Second, parents’ DM variables that predicted MVPA among preschool children were parents’ DME and DMA in the urban regions and parents’ DME in the rural regions, and these remained significantly different between regions even after adjusting for sex, age, and BMI. Children’s PA and screen times are influenced by parents’ attitudes and beliefs, which can either hinder or facilitate children’s PA or screen times [44]. In one of our joint studies conducted in Finland, children’s PA and (digital media use) DMU were reported to be associated with parents’ participation, and the association strengthened with a decrease in the child’s age [24]. A literature review showed that parents’ PA and DME affect children’s health behaviors [21], and the importance of active parental participation increases further in the coming years with continued advances and access in digitalization. Although a growing number of parents value learning competencies over PA amidst the intensifying focus on academics even in early childhood, many studies continue to show that PA in early childhood has a strong impact on brain development [45]. Hence, parents’ active involvement in outdoor play or performing easy stretching exercises at home with their children can help to boost the practice of MVPA [26]. Indeed, our findings showed that parents’ DMA is associated with children’s MVPA. Previous studies also showed that people with poor health literacy are not likely to practice healthy behaviors, including PA [46], and are therefore at an increased health risk for disease [47]. A study on adolescents showed that moderate or high health literacy is positively associated with PA in leisure time [48]. However, unlike the cases of adults and adolescents, outdoor play and PA among preschool children is highly influenced by their parents’ awareness and positive actions for healthy health behaviors [49]. Therefore, parents’ function as good role models for their children as well as their health awareness positively contribute to children’s health behaviors [50].
Finally, this study showed that children’s screen time was significantly associated with parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA in the urban regions, and with parents’ DMH and DMA in the rural regions. Parents’ media-watching habits in leisure time were a common predictor of children’s screen times in both the urban and rural regions. Related Western research supports our findings [51,52], and a study on young children in Singapore-based research found a strong correlation of 0.9 or higher, between young children’s screen time and parental screen time, alluding to the close relationship between the two daily habits [53]. These results suggest that interventions that are focused on reducing screen time among preschool children should be based on family factors, such as parents’ involvement, and should start in early childhood, and target modifiable factors in the family environment [54]. Some research shows that increased screen time among children is linked to sex, age, the weekend, poorly educated parents, and high media access [55,56]. A Chinese study showed that children’s screen time declines with an increase in the health literacy of parents [57]. Even though preschool children are engaged in DM for a substantial duration, children with parents who are aware of DM guidelines showed relatively shorter use of DM, highlighting the importance of parents’ awareness of DM engagement guidelines for children. The associations between parents’ social factors (e.g., household income) and environmental factors, such as media access, play a pivotal role in evidence-based intervention studies that emphasize the need to limit prolonged screen time among children [58].
Our results must be interpreted with consideration of a few factors. First, the study data were collected from the reliable and validated SMALLQ® using a culturally adapted version for Japan. The SMALLQ® is a parent-report and recall questionnaire and thus may be vulnerable to self-report bias, social desirability bias, and recall bias [59]. Notwithstanding the limitations of subjective measures such as the questionnaire, mitigation strategies such as assurance of anonymity of survey responses and span of recall limited to the last 7 days were put in place to reduce biases. Second, the cross-sectional design of the study hinders making a causal inference between parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA and the adherence to the 24-h MG by region. Therefore, a longitudinal study or intervention study should be conducted to examine such relationships with greater clarity. Third, our study was conducted on preschool children in the Northeast and Kansai region of Japan, and therefore, the findings cannot be generalized to the entire preschool-age population in Japan. Fourth, in classifying urban and rural areas, the distinction was made based on the 1947 Japanese Enforcement Decree of Statutes of Local Governments, with the limitation that other demographic factors such as parental occupation, educational background, and household income could not be investigated. Our findings can bolster the evidence for various environmental factors involved in compliance with 24-h MG among preschool-aged children, and because these are strictly limited to preschool children in an Asian country, they present significant implications for developing effective interventions. In this study, we confirmed the relationship with parents’ DM to increase the 24-h MG compliance rate, but it is necessary to examine various factors applying the ecological model in a future study.

5. Conclusions

This research confirmed that parents’ DM is a strong predictor of adherence to 24-h MG among preschool children in Japan in urban and rural regions. Our findings showed that the 24-h MG (MVPA, screen time, sleep duration) of preschool children living in the urban and rural regions in Japan were different. Weekday MVPA was longer in the urban regions, while screen time on the weekends was longer in the rural regions. Further, this research showed that children’s screen time was significantly associated with parents’ DMH, DME, and DMA in the urban regions and with parents’ DMH and DMA in the rural regions. We specifically investigated parents’ DM engagement in relation to those of their children, which relatively has not attracted much research attention. Thus, our findings are significant for developing effective intervention programs for boosting compliance with 24-h MG that will contribute to ensuring the good health of preschool children.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Y.H.C. and H.K.; methodology, H.G., J.M., T.B.K.C. and L.Y.T.; validation, J.M., T.B.K.C., L.Y.T., M.Y.H.C. and H.K.; formal analysis, H.G. and H.K.; data curation, H.G., J.M. and H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.G., J.M. and H.K.; writing—review and editing, T.B.K.C., L.Y.T. and M.Y.H.C.; visualization, H.G. and H.K.; supervision, M.Y.H.C. and H.K.; project administration, M.Y.H.C. and H.K.; funding acquisition, M.Y.H.C. and H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 21K11555, and the International Joint Research Project in Sendai University (Grant Number: 2018-0025). This work is part of a larger multinational study called International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study Among Asians and OtheRs (IISSAAR) which is funded and supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore (OER 29/19 MCYH).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sendai University Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Sports Science (IRB Number: SU2019-31), and from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (IRB 2019-02-036).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the study design; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Telama, R. Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A review. Obes. Facts 2009, 2, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chaput, J.P.; Colley, R.C.; Aubert, S.; Carson, V.; Janssen, I.; Roberts, K.C.; Tremblay, M.S. Proportion of preschool-aged children meeting the Canadian 24-hour Movement Guidelines and associations with adiposity: Results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. BMC Public Health 2017, 17 (Suppl. S5), 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chaput, J.P.; Carson, V.; Gray, C.E.; Tremblay, M.S. Importance of all movement behaviors in a 24 hour period for overall health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 12575–12581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tremblay, M.S.; Carson, V.; Chaput, J.P.; Connor Gorber, S.; Dinh, T.; Duggan, M.; Faulkner, G.; Gray, C.E.; Gruber, R.; Janson, K.; et al. Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: An integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2016, 41 (Suppl. S3), S311–S327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Health Organization. Guidelines on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep for Children under 5 Years of Age. 2019. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311664/9789241550536-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y/ (accessed on 17 February 2022).
  6. Chaput, J.P.; Saunders, T.J.; Carson, V. Interactions between sleep, movement and other non-movement behaviours in the pathogenesis of childhood obesity. Obes. Rev. 2017, 18 (Suppl. S1), 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Janssen, X.; Martin, A.; Hughes, A.R.; Hill, C.M.; Kotronoulas, G.; Hesketh, K.R. Associations of screen time, sedentary time and physical activity with sleep in under 5s: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. Rev. 2020, 49, 101226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vale, S.; Mota, J. Adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines among Portuguese preschool children: The prestyle study. J. Sports Sci. 2020, 38, 2149–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chia, M.Y.H.; Tay, L.Y.; Chua, T.B.K. Quality of life and meeting 24-h WHO guidelines among preschool children in Singapore. Early Child Educ. J. 2020, 48, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santos, R.; Zhang, Z.; Pereira, J.R.; Sousa-Sá, E.; Cliff, D.P.; Okely, A.D. Compliance with the Australian 24-hour movement guidelines for the early years: Associations with weight status. BMC Public Health 2017, 17 (Suppl. S5), 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kracht, C.L.; Webster, E.K.; Staiano, A.E. Sociodemographic differences in young children meeting 24-hour movement guidelines. J. Phys. Act. Health 2019, 16, 908–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, H.; Ma, J.; Kim, J.; Xu, D.; Lee, S. Changes in Adherence to the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines and Overweight and Obesity among Children in Northeastern Japan: A Longitudinal Study before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Obesities 2021, 1, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, B.; Bernard, J.Y.; Padmapriya, N.; Yao, J.; Goh, C.; Tan, K.H.; Yap, F.; Chong, Y.-S.; Shek, L.; Godfrey, K.M.; et al. Socio-demographic and maternal predictors of adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines in Singaporean children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sampasa-Kanyinga, H.; Colman, I.; Goldfield, G.S.; Janssen, I.; Wang, J.; Podinic, I.; Tremblay, M.S.; Saunders, T.J.; Sampson, M.; Chaput, J.P. Combinations of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration and their associations with depressive symptoms and other mental health problems in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xiong, X.; Dalziel, K.; Carvalho, N.; Xu, R.; Huang, L. Association between 24-hour movement behaviors and health-related quality of life in children. Qual. Life Res. 2022, 31, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, H.; Ma, J.; Lee, S.; Gu, Y. Change in Japanese children’s 24-hour movement guidelines and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22972. [Google Scholar]
  17. Reid Chassiakos, Y.L.; Radesky, J.; Christakis, D.; Moreno, M.A.; Cross, C.; Hill, D.; Ameenuddin, N.; Hutchinson, J.; Levine, A.; Boyd, R. Children and Adolescents and Digital Media. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20162593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stephens-Reicher, J.; Metcalf, A.; Blanchard, M.; Mangan, C.; Burns, J. Reaching the hard-to-reach: How information communication technologies can reach young people at greater risk of mental health difficulties. Australas Psychiatry 2011, 19 (Suppl. S1), S58–S61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. McDaniel, B.T.; Radesky, J.S. Technoference: Longitudinal associations between parent technology use, parenting stress, and child behavior problems. Pediatr. Res. 2018, 84, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kim, J.; LaRose, R.; Peng, W. Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2009, 12, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, H.; Ma, J.; Maehashi, A. Factors impacting levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior among young children: A literature review. Int. J. Appl. Sports Sci. 2017, 29, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Davison, K.K.; Birch, L.L. Childhood overweight: A contextual model and recommendations for future research. Obes. Rev. 2001, 2, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barlow, S.E.; Expert Committee. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: Summary report. Pediatrics 2007, 120 (Suppl. S4), S164–S192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hasanen, E.; Koivukoski, H.; Kortelainen, L.; Vehmas, H.; Sääkslahti, A. Sociodemographic correlates of parental co-participation in digital media use and physical play of preschool-age children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Q.; Ma, J.; Harada, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Sano, H.; Kim, H. Associations among Outdoor Playtime, Screen Time, and Environmental Factors in Japanese Preschoolers: The Eat, Be Active, and Sleep Well Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Q.; Ma, J.; Maehashi, A.; Kim, H. The Associations between outdoor playtime, screen-viewing time, and environmental factors in Chinese young children: The eat, be active and sleep well study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chia, M.; Tay, L.Y.; Chua, T.B.K. The development of an online surveillance of digital media use in early childhood questionnaire-SMALLQ™-for Singapore. Monten J. Sports Sci. Med. 2019, 8, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. World Health Organisation. Process of Translation and Adaptation of Instruments. 2016. Available online: https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/ (accessed on 19 March 2022).
  29. Tavakol, M.; Dennick, R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2011, 2, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, H.; Ma, J.; Harada, K.; Lee, S.; Gu, Y. Associations between adherence to combinations of 24-h movement guidelines and overweight and obesity in Japanese preschool children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 2006, 450, 76–85. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nelson, N.M.; Wright, A.; Lowry, R.G.; Mutrie, N. Article Commentary: Where is the Theoretical Basis for Understanding and Measuring the Environment for Physical Activity? Environ. Health Insights 2008, 2, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Okely, A.D.; Reilly, J.J.; Tremblay, M.S.; Kariippanon, K.E.; Draper, C.E.; El Hamdouchi, A.; Florindo, A.A.; Green, J.P.; Guan, H.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; et al. Cross-sectional examination of 24-hour movement behaviours among 3-and 4-year-old children in urban and rural settings in low-income, middle-income and high-income countries: The SUNRISE study protocol. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e049267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Manyanga, T.; Barnes, J.D.; Chaput, J.P.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Prista, A.; Tremblay, M.S. Prevalence and correlates of adherence to movement guidelines among urban and rural children in Mozambique: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, S.T.; Yan, J. Prevalence and selected sociodemographic of movement behaviors in schoolchildren from low-and middle-income families in Nanjing, China: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Children 2020, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, S.T.; Liu, Y.; Hong, J.T.; Tang, Y.; Cao, Z.B.; Zhuang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, P.J. Co-existence of physical activity and sedentary behavior among children and adolescents in Shanghai, China: Do gender and age matter? BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, S.J.; Hung, W.C.; Sharpe, P.A.; Wai, J.P. Neighborhood environment and physical activity among urban and rural schoolchildren in Taiwan. Health Place 2010, 16, 470–476. [Google Scholar]
  38. Manyanga, T.; Pelletier, C.; Prince, S.A.; Lee, E.Y.; Sluggett, L.; Lang, J.J. A Comparison of Meeting Physical Activity and Screen Time Recommendations between Canadian Youth Living in Rural and Urban Communities: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Christiana, R.W.; Bouldin, E.D.; Battista, R.A. Active living environments mediate rural and non-rural differences in physical activity, active transportation, and screen time among adolescents. Prev. Med. Rep. 2021, 23, 101422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carson, V.; Iannotti, R.J.; Pickett, W.; Janssen, I. Urban and rural differences in sedentary behavior among American and Canadian youth. Health Place 2011, 17, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. McGrath, L.J.; Hopkins, W.G.; Hinckson, E.A. Associations of objectively measured built-environment attributes with youth moderate–vigorous physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015, 45, 841–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tremblay, M.S.; Willms, J.D. Is the Canadian childhood obesity epidemic related to physical inactivity? Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2003, 27, 1100–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Carver, A.; Timperio, A.; Crawford, D. Playing it safe: The influence of neighbourhood safety on children’s physical activity—A review. Health Place 2008, 14, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hesketh, K.D.; Hinkley, T.; Campbell, K.J. Children′ s physical activity and screen time: Qualitative comparison of views of parents of infants and preschool children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2012, 9, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Singh, A.; Uijtdewilligen, L.; Twisk, J.W.; van Mechelen, W.; Chinapaw, M.J. Physical activity and performance at school: A systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2012, 166, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Buja, A.; Rabensteiner, A.; Sperotto, M.; Grotto, G.; Bertoncello, C.; Cocchio, S.; Baldovin, T.; Contu, P.; Lorini, C.; Baldo, V. Health literacy and physical activity: A systematic review. J. Phys. Act. Health 2020, 17, 1259–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Berkman, N.D.; Sheridan, S.L.; Donahue, K.E.; Halpern, D.J.; Crotty, K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011, 155, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sukys, S.; Tilindiene, I.; Trinkuniene, L. Association between health literacy and leisure time physical activity among Lithuanian adolescents. Health Soc. Care Community 2021, 29, e387–e395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Faulkner, G.E.; Richichi, V.; Buliung, R.N.; Fusco, C.; Moola, F. What’s "quickest and easiest?": Parental decision making about school trip mode. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Griffith, J.R.; Clasey, J.L.; King, J.T.; Gantz, S.; Kryscio, R.J.; Bada, H.S. Role of parents in determining children’s physical activity. World J. Pediatr. 2007, 3, 265–270. [Google Scholar]
  51. Birken, C.S.; Maguire, J.; Mekky, M.; Manlhiot, C.; Beck, C.E.; Jacobson, S.; Peer, M.; Taylor, C.; McCrindle, B.W.; Parkin, P.C.; et al. Parental factors associated with screen time in pre-school children in primary-care practice: A TARGet Kids! study. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 2134–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carson, V.; Janssen, I. Associations between factors within the home setting and screen time among children aged 0–5 years: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tay, L.Y.; Aiyoob, T.B.; Chua, T.B.K.; Ramachandran, K.; Chia, M.Y.H. Pre-schoolers’ use of technology and digital media in Singapore: Entertainment indulgence and/or learning engagement? Educ. Media Int. 2021, 58, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Golan, M.; Crow, S. Targeting parents exclusively in the treatment of childhood obesity: Long-term results. Obes. Res. 2004, 12, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hoyos Cillero, I.; Jago, R. Sociodemographic and home environment predictors of screen viewing among Spanish school children. J. Public Health 2011, 33, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. LeBlanc, A.G.; Broyles, S.T.; Chaput, J.P.; Leduc, G.; Boyer, C.; Borghese, M.M.; Tremblay, M.S. Correlates of objectively measured sedentary time and self-reported screen time in Canadian children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2015, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, P.; Xu, J.; Zhang, W. Health literacy, screen time and associated factors among middle school students in Yinchuan. Chin. J. Sch. Health 2021, 12, 551–555. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hoyos Cillero, I.; Jago, R. Systematic review of correlates of screen-viewing among young children. Prev. Med. 2010, 51, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Althubaiti, A. Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2016, 4, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proposed the relationships between urban/rural parents’ digital media habits, engagement, awareness, and 24-h MG for preschool children.
Figure 1. Proposed the relationships between urban/rural parents’ digital media habits, engagement, awareness, and 24-h MG for preschool children.
Ijerph 19 10484 g001
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and urban/rural differences among parents and their children.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and urban/rural differences among parents and their children.
VariablesTotal
(n = 867)
Urban Region
(n = 489)
Rural Region
(n = 378)
p-Value
n (%) or mean ± SD a
Characteristics of child
 Sex (girl: n, %) 410(47.3)235(48.1)175(46.3)0.607
 Age (years: mean, SD)4.6±0.94.6±0.94.5±0.90.298
 Height (cm: mean, SD)106.9±7.8106.6±7.7107.4±8.10.179
 Weight (kg: mean, SD)17.7±3.017.4±2.718.1±3.4<0.001
 BMI (kg/m2: mean, SD)15.4±1.515.3±1.415.6±1.6<0.001
 BMI z-score (mean, SD)−0.04±0.84−0.09±0.830.05±0.860.034
Characteristics of parents
 Sex (mother: n, %)796(91.8)459(93.9)337(89.2)0.017
 Age (years: mean, SD)37.2±5.138.1±4.836.1±5.2<0.001
 BMI (kg/m2: n, %)
  <18.49102(13.7)64(15.1)38(11.9)<0.001
  18.5–24.9574(77.4)329(77.8)245(76.8)
  >25.066(8.9)30(7.1)36(11.3)
a SD, standard deviation. p-values were calculated using t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.
Table 2. Digital media habits, engagement, awareness, and urban/rural differences among parents.
Table 2. Digital media habits, engagement, awareness, and urban/rural differences among parents.
VariablesTotalUrban RegionRural Regionp-Value
Parents’ digital media habits (min: mean, SD) a
 Entertainment (weekday)97.9±79.598.7±84.996.9±72.10.747
 Entertainment (weekend)130.1±104.0116.0±97.4148.1±109.3<0.001
 Entertainment (total)113.1±86.0106.7±86.3121.1±85.10.016
 Social networking (weekday)30.3±41.229.8±40.630.8±42.10.741
 Social networking (weekend)34.3±46.831.6±44.737.8±49.20.063
 Social networking (total)31.9±42.130.4±41.133.9±43.50.246
Parents’ engagement with child (%: mean, SD) b
 Physical play (weekday)27.1±28.428.5±28.825.2±27.80.101
 Physical play (weekend)46.7±30.047.6±30.945.5±28.90.328
 Physical play (total)32.4±26.533.8±27.030.5±25.80.069
 Digital media (weekday)46.8±32.845.4±32.848.7±32.80.142
 Digital media (weekend)52.1±31.250.2±31.854.6±30.20.041
 Digital media (total)48.2±31.046.5±31.150.4±30.90.072
Parents’ digital media awareness (point: mean, SD) c
 Limit digital media use 2.7±1.22.7±1.22.5±1.20.085
 Limit screen time to 1 h per day 2.7±1.12.8±1.12.6±1.10.038
 Introduce only educational programs 1.7±1.01.8±1.11.6±1.00.030
a SD, standard deviation. Group differences for continuous variables were assessed using t-tests. b Parents’ engagement with child. c Response option: (0) I am not aware, (1) I am not aware but practicing, (2) I am aware but do not practice, (3) I am aware and practicing.
Table 3. Urban/rural differences in children’s MVPA, screen time, sleep duration, and compliance with recommendations.
Table 3. Urban/rural differences in children’s MVPA, screen time, sleep duration, and compliance with recommendations.
VariablesTotalUrban RegionRural Regionp-Value
MVPA (min/day: mean, SD)
  Weekday23.6±35.426.8±31.920.4±38.30.017
  Weekend59.3±65.959.4±64.459.2±67.70.958
Screen time (min/day: mean, SD)
  Weekday87.4±67.186.0±67.089.3±67.10.469
  Weekend126.4±88.6113.6±80.2143.7±95.9<0.001
Sleep duration (min/day: mean, SD)
  Weekday606.7±63.4609.3±60.2603.0±67.60.167
  Weekend634.5±69.7630.4±68.5639.8±71.10.057
MVPA (% recommendations) a
  Weekday12.714.910.50.082
  Weekend35.834.137.60.314
Screen time (% recommendations) b
  Weekday23.024.621.00.209
  Weekend13.015.99.30.005
Sleep duration (% recommendations) c
  Weekday60.767.751.2<0.001
  Weekend78.980.277.30.312
SD, standard deviation; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Group differences for continuous variables were assessed using t-tests and for categorical variables were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, a 180 min of total physical activity including 60 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, b no more than 60 min/day for screen time, c between 10 and 13 h/day for sleep duration.
Table 4. Results from multiple regression analyses of 24-h movement guidelines and parents’ digital media habits, engagement, awareness for urban children.
Table 4. Results from multiple regression analyses of 24-h movement guidelines and parents’ digital media habits, engagement, awareness for urban children.
Variables Associated to ParentsUrban Region a
MVPAScreen TimeSleep Duration
b(95% CI)βp-Valueb(95% CI)βp-Valueb(95% CI)βp-Value
Screen time on entertainment−0.021(−0.467, 0.024)−0.0490.3600.340(0.263, 0.415)0.4050.0010.095(−0.025, 0.166)0.0710.174
Screen time on social networking0.035(−0.054, 0.123)0.0420.183−0.064(−0.233, 0.105)−0.0390.455−0.090(−0.241, 0.060)−0.0600.240
Physical play engagement with child0.604(0.479, 0.729)0.4540.001−0.374(−0.636, −0.112)−0.1440.005−0.128(−0.352, 0.092)−0.0570.261
Digital media engagement with child0.180(0.061, 0.299)0.1580.0030.061(−0.160, 0.281)−0.0270.5890.135(−0.056, 0.326)0.0690.166
Limit digital media use for children4.418(1.337, 7.498)0.1480.005−9.919(−15.736, −4.103)−0.1670.0011.293(−3.818, 6.404)0.0250.619
Limit screen time to 1 h per day4.436(1.129, 7.744)0.1380.009−15.636(−21.634, −9.638)−0.2480.001−0.303(−5.622, 5.016)−0.0060.911
Introduce educational programs1.283(−2.103, 4.668)0.0400.457−5.669(−12.122, 0.784)−0.0880.0854.271(−1.219, 9.761)−0.0760.127
MVPA moderate to vigorous physical activity. b (95% CI), unstandardized coefficients and its 95% confidence interval. β, standardized coefficients. a Adjusted standardized regression coefficients for age, sex and BMI.
Table 5. Results from multiple regression analyses of 24-h movement guidelines and parents’ digital media habits, engagement, awareness for rural children.
Table 5. Results from multiple regression analyses of 24-h movement guidelines and parents’ digital media habits, engagement, awareness for rural children.
Variables Associated to ParentsRural Region a
MVPAScreen TimeSleep Duration
b(95% CI)βp-Valueb(95% CI)βp-Valueb(95% CI)βp-Value
Screen time for entertainment0.024(−0.026, 0.073)−0.0550.3490.410(0.317, 0.502)0.4520.0010.036(−0.56, 0.128)0.0450.443
Screen time for social networking−0.061(−0.152, 0.028)−0.0810.138−0.082(−0.278, 0.114)−0.0500.4110.053(−0.118, 0.223)0.0370.545
Physical play engagement with child0.577(0.450, 0.705)0.4720.001−0.303(−0.615, 0.010)−0.1130.0570.194(−0.127, 0.661)0.1690.154
Digital media engagement with child0.146(0.024, 0.267)0.1390.0190.147(−0.110, 0.403)0.0660.262−0.046(−0.273, 0.182)−0.0230.693
Limit digital media use for children0.190(−3.113, 3.492)0.0070.910−1.780(−8.803, 5.244)−0.0300.618−0.794(−7.120, 5.532)−0.0150.805
Limit screen time to 1 h per day0.702(−2.780, 4.184)0.0240.692−5.877(−13.198, 1.424)−0.0940.1144.271(−1.219, 9.761)0.0760.127
Introduce educational programs3.307(−0.578, 7.193)0.1020.095−8.408(−16.671, −0.145)−0.1220.0462.007(−5.415, 9.480)0.0320.597
MVPA moderate to vigorous physical activity. b (95% CI), unstandardized coefficients and its 95% confidence interval. β, standardized coefficients. a Adjusted standardized regression coefficients for age, sex and BMI.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, H.; Ma, J.; Chua, T.B.K.; Tay, L.Y.; Chia, M.Y.H.; Kim, H. Associations between Parents’ Digital Media Habits, Engagement, Awareness, and Movement Guidelines among Preschool-Age Children: International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710484

AMA Style

Guo H, Ma J, Chua TBK, Tay LY, Chia MYH, Kim H. Associations between Parents’ Digital Media Habits, Engagement, Awareness, and Movement Guidelines among Preschool-Age Children: International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(17):10484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Hongzhi, Jiameng Ma, Terence Buan Kiong Chua, Lee Yong Tay, Michael Yong Hwa Chia, and Hyunshik Kim. 2022. "Associations between Parents’ Digital Media Habits, Engagement, Awareness, and Movement Guidelines among Preschool-Age Children: International Ipreschooler Surveillance Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 17: 10484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop