Next Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Behavioral Disorders in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome and Their Families—A Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Financial Measures to Reduce Carbon Emissions in Britain, Japan and the United States: A SWOT Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence Trends from 1993 to 2012 in Lampang, Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effectiveness and Trade-Offs of Renewable Energy Policies in Achieving the Dual Decarbonization Goals in China: A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

How Can China and the Belt and Road Initiative Countries Work Together Responding to Climate Change: A Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Economic Spillover Effects

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9553; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159553
by Yanmei Li * and Xiushan Bai
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9553; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159553
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Revised: 31 July 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 3 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Carbon Neutrality: Behavior and Policy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I attach the file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewers,
Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in below and my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files.
Thanks again!

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper describes the economic and ecologic (CO2) overspills of trade partnerships between China and BRI partners. The paper is well written and describes the trade volumes and its impacts.

The paper might be improved by adding the logistic "efforts" of the trade. As far as I understand (this is not clear to me) the numbers describe/include basically the volumes of the trade goods multiplied with the CO2 emissions (my assumption). But the trade logistics are missing. The logistic chain potentially also includes a huge potential for lowering the environmental impact.

Due to the "political" aspect of such a study I recommend to include more international literature ressources to reach a broader acceptance (in case of potential criticism).

Author Response

Dear Reviewers,

Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in below and my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files.

Thanks again!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors, The subject matter is very interesting, but the presented content should be developed:

1. research question "Why should China and the BRI countries join hands to deal with climate change?" seems obvious - if you collaborate with someone, you need to collaborate in all areas relevant to the parties involved;

2. the analyzes carried out do not show how "this study explores how China and the Belt and Road Initiative countries can work together to cope with climate change." - the formulated conclusions are very general and may apply to any broadly understood economic cooperation;

3. there are no research hypotheses formulated on the basis of the literature review and research questions;

4. there is no indication of the weaknesses of cooperation between the parties and the obstacles that could stand in the way of the implementation of the undertaken plans;

5. 4 charts (Figure 2) are illegible - I suggest enlarging them and numbering them separately;

6. editorial error: "this paper analyzes why and how China and the BRI countries ..." - it is not the article that analyzes, but the authors who present the research results in the article;

7. there is no broader presentation of the results of international research;

8. there are no specific recommendations that would be conducive to achieving the set goal - the broadly understood cooperation seems insufficient.

Best regards, Reviewer        

Author Response

Dear Reviewers,

Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in below and my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files.

Thanks again!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

I found the subject interesting and well-presented and I am grateful for the chance to review this paper.

I have one suggestion, which I believe, benefit this paper:

On subsection “4.1.1. Regional carbon emissions spillover effects below line 206 a total of 3 figures and 4 tables are presented without comments or presentation. In fact Figure 2 and Table 2 are mentioned on the next subsection and Table 3 is mention on section 4.2. My suggestion is to reorganize the figures and tables along with the text. In this way it will be easy to read and understand the figures and tables.

Author Response

Dear Reviewers,

Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in below and my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files.

Thanks again!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

I am satisfied with the changes made, I accept the article.

Back to TopTop