Next Article in Journal
Addressing Trauma-Informed Principles in Public Health through Training and Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
Lost in Communication: Do Family Physicians Provide Patients with Information on Preventing Diet-Related Diseases?
Previous Article in Journal
Sports and Health, Second Edition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Trends in Health Literacy Research, Health Status of the Population and Disease Prevention: An Editorial

1
Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics with e-Health Lab, Medical University of Lublin, K. Jaczewskiego 5 Street, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Environmental Hazards Prevention, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Street, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(14), 8436; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148436
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 10 July 2022
One challenge for the development of healthcare systems worldwide is to shape society’s health literacy. The World Health Organisation (WHO) defines health literacy as the cognitive and social skills that determine the motivation and ability of individuals to access, understand, and use information in ways which promote and maintain good health [1,2]. Health literacy improves people’s ability to better understand health-related notions and may increase their capacity to take responsibility for their health, which is of great importance in prophylaxis [3]. Health literacy is not just the result of an individual’s capabilities, but also of the demands and complexities of the healthcare system [4]. The shaping of health literacy is highly influenced by the healthcare systems in a given country, as well as by individual and environmental factors present in the interactions between individuals and the systemic demands of the healthcare system [5].
Health literacy may impact patient adherence, the frequency of using medical services, and the number of hospitalisations [6]. Studies have confirmed this thesis, and have indicated a correlation between low health literacy, poor health, and the unjustified frequent use of health services; this is particularly the case for admission rooms and more frequent hospitalisations [7,8,9,10], which create a higher financial burden for the healthcare system. Nearly half of the European population have low health literacy [1], which can also be observed in the United States [11,12].
Health-literacy-related literature shows a range of dependencies and reasons for low health literacy in families [13,14], which may influence: parents/carers when providing medication dosage to children, breastfeeding time, and child health outcomes, such as the symptoms of depression, asthma, etc. [15,16,17,18]. One basic tool for shaping health literacy is education. Sparse health knowledge is associated with more frequent emergency assistance, less frequent use of prophylactic services, a lower capacity to interpret health labels and notices, higher mortality, and higher healthcare expenses [14]. Low health literacy may also be a barrier to taking care of chronically ill patients, and may interfere with taking measures at the central level regarding the functioning of healthcare systems, with the objectives of prophylaxis, early diagnosis, and treatment [19,20].
Studies on health literacy are becoming increasingly important in the context of public health and health promotion. Human behaviour is becoming an integral factor that determines health maintenance and disease development [21]. The essence of a holistic approach to health lies in acknowledging the complex relationships between a person and their environment, as well as in highlighting the dynamic, interactive, and multidimensional nature of health [22]. Health literacy is a determinant of health behaviour and of preventing disease. It must be noted that health literacy is associated with the quality of decisions related to healthcare, infectious and chronic disease prevention, and health promotion, to maintain or improve quality of life [19,20,21,22].
Health literacy is also the knowledge of health behaviour and of the prevention and elimination of diseases, major threats, and harmful factors for health. Health behaviour has been considered the most significant element of health promotion and disease prevention and needs to be developed, especially in primary healthcare [23]. Health behaviour is defined as any intentional activity of an individual aimed at healthcare, regardless of its efficiency [24]. This issue has been the subject of theoretical deliberation and studies in different fields. The results lead to the assertion that non-compliance with the guidelines for a healthy lifestyle (any detrimental health behaviour) is a risk factor for diseases in civilisation [25,26,27,28]. Lifestyle is of great importance for health. The recommendations indicating the foundations of modern healthcare emphasise the necessity to guarantee a structure that facilitates the implementation and evaluation of health promotion and the prevention of infectious and chronic diseases, simultaneously monitoring those health behaviours that delay these diseases and complications.
It is extremely important to carry out scientific research that analyses the relationships between health awareness, health behaviours, and the health status of the population. A Special Issue on “Recent Trends in Health Literacy Research, Health Status of the Population and Disease Prevention” (IJERPH) presents publications reviewing health literacy, the capacities and behaviours of the population that impact their health, and the prevention of chronic and infectious diseases. The studies evaluate the health capacities and behaviours of the population, attitudes toward preventative actions in healthcare (e.g., immunisation and healthy lifestyle), and systemic factors, policies and practices that enhance or inhibit the health of the population. The results of these studies (as well as infodemiological studies) evaluating the variables impacting the health of the population are presented. Reports on methods for assessing the health literacy of individuals and the population are crucial, and ensure the review of up-to-date national and international political initiatives in health literacy.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kickbusch, I.; Pelikan, J.; Apfel, F.; Tsouros, A. Health Literacy: The Solid Facts; Regional Office for Europe; World Health Organation: København, Denmark, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Track 2: Health Literacy and Health Behaviour. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/health-278promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/seventh-global-conference/health-literacy (accessed on 22 June 2022).
  3. Berkman, N.D.; Davis, T.C.; McCormack, L. Health literacy: What is it? J. Health Commun. 2010, 15, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rowlands, G. Health literacy. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2014, 10, 2130–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nutbeam, D. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into 21st century. Health Promot. Int. 2000, 15, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bo, A.; Friis, K.; Osborne, R.H.; Maindal, H.T. National indicators of health literacy: Ability to understand health information and to engage actively with healthcare providers—A population-based survey among Danish adults. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Aaby, A.; Friis, K.; Christensen, B.; Rowlands, G.; Terkildsen, H. Health literacy is associated with health behaviour and self-reported health: A large population-based study in individuals with cardiovascular disease. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2017, 24, 1880–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sørensen, K.; Pelikan, J.M.; Röthlin, F.; Ganahl, K.; Slonska, Z.; Doyle, G.; Fullam, J.; Kondilis, B.; Agrafiotis, D.; Uiters, E.; et al. Health Literacy in Europe: Comparative results of the European Health Literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur. J. Public Health 2015, 25, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Griffey, R.T.; Kennedy, S.K.; McGowan, L.; Goodman, M.; Kaphingst, K.A. Is low health literacy associated with increased emergency department utilization and recidivism? Acad. Emerg. Med. 2014, 21, 1109–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Garcia-Codina, O.; Juvinyà-Canal, D.; Amil-Bujan, P.; Bertran-Noguer, C.; González-Mestre, M.A.; Masachs-Fatjo, E.; Santaeugènia, S.J.; Magrinyà-Rull, P.; Saltó-Cerezuela, E. Determinants of health literacy in the general population: Results of the Catalan health survey. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berkman, N.D.; Sheridan, S.L.; Donahue, K.E.; Halpern, D.J.; Viera, A.; Crotty, K.; Holland, A.; Brasure, M.; Lohr, K.N.; Harden, E.; et al. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: An updated systematic review. In Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 199; Prepared by RTI International–University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–2007–10056-I; AHRQ Publication Number 11-E006; AHRQ Publication: Rockville, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fleary, S.A.; Ettienne, R. Social disparities in health literacy in the United States. Health Lit. Res. Pract. 2019, 3, e47–e52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baker, D.W.; Wolf, M.S.; Feinglass, J.; Thompson, J.A.; Gazmararian, J.A.; Huang, J. Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007, 167, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Berkman, N.D.; Sheridan, S.L.; Donahue, K.E.; Halpern, D.J.; Crotty, K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011, 155, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yin, H.S.; Dreyer, B.P.; Foltin, G.; van Schaick, L.; Mendelsohn, A.L. Association of low care-giver health literacy with reported use of nonstandardized dosing instruments and lack of knowledge of weight-based dosing. Ambul. Pediatr. 2007, 7, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. DeWalt, D.A.; Dilling, M.H.; Rosenthal, M.S.; Pignone, M.P. Low parental literacy is associated with worse asthma care measures in children. Ambul. Pediatr. 2007, 7, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kaufman, H.; Skipper, B.; Small, L.; Terry, T.; McGrew, M. Effect of literacy on breast-feeding outcomes. South Med. J. 2001, 94, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sleath, B.L.; Jackson, E.; Thomas, K.C.; Galloway, J.; Dumain, L.; Thorpe, J.; Rollins, A.; Morrissey, J. Literacy and perceived barriers to medication taking among homeless mothers and their children. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2006, 63, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dinh, H.T.T.; Nguyen, N.T.; Bonner, A. Health literacy profiles of adults with multiple chronic diseases: A cross-sectional study using the Health Literacy Questionnaire. Nurs. Health Sci. 2020, 22, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, L.; Qian, X.; Chen, Z.; He, T. Health literacy and its effect on chronic disease prevention: Evidence from China’s data. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spring, B.; Moller, A.C.; Coons, M.J. Multiple health behaviours: Overview and implications. J. Public Health 2012, 34, i3–i10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tomljenović, A. Holistic approach to human health and disease: Life circumstances and inner processing. Coll. Antropol. 2014, 38, 787–792. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shorta, S.E.; Mollbornb, S. Social Determinants and Health Behaviors: Conceptual Frames and Empirical Advances. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2015, 5, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. World Health Organization. Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Strahler, J.; Nater, U.M.; Skoluda, N. Associations between Health Behaviors and Factors on Markers of Healthy Psychological and Physiological Functioning: A Daily Diary Study. Ann. Behav. Med. 2020, 1, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qin, L.; Knol, M.J.; Corpeleijn, E.; Stolk, R.P. Does physical activity modify the risk of obesity for type 2 diabetes: A review of epidemiological data. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 25, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mente, A.; de Koning, L.; Shannon, H.S.; Anand, S.S. A systematic review of the evidence supporting a causal link between dietary factors and coronary heart disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Cramer, J.A.; Benedict, A.; Muszbek, N.; Keskinaslan, A.; Khan, Z.M. The significance of compliance and persistence in the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: A review. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2008, 62, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barańska, A.; Kłak, A. Recent Trends in Health Literacy Research, Health Status of the Population and Disease Prevention: An Editorial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148436

AMA Style

Barańska A, Kłak A. Recent Trends in Health Literacy Research, Health Status of the Population and Disease Prevention: An Editorial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(14):8436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148436

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barańska, Agnieszka, and Anna Kłak. 2022. "Recent Trends in Health Literacy Research, Health Status of the Population and Disease Prevention: An Editorial" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 14: 8436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148436

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop