Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Providing Staff Training and Enhanced Support to Care Homes on Care Processes, Safety Climate and Avoidable Harms: Evaluation of a Care Home Quality Improvement Programme in England
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical and Laboratory Features of JAK2 V617F, CALR, and MPL Mutations in Malaysian Patients with Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Psychometric Properties of Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 for Predicting Suicidal Ideation among Migrant Industrial Workers in China

1
School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201800, China
2
JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
3
School of Media and Communication, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518000, China
4
Shenzhen Longhua District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen 518000, China
5
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511431, China
6
Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(14), 7583; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147583
Submission received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 14 July 2021 / Published: 16 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Psychodermatology)

Abstract

:
Objective: Interpersonal theories of suicide suggest that the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) can be used to measure suicidal ideation, but few studies have focused on migrant people, a group with a high prevalence of suicidal ideation. The aim of this study was to validate the psychometric properties of the INQ-15 and its prediction of suicidal ideation among migrant industrial workers in China. Method: A stratified multi-stage sample of 2023 industrial workers was recruited from 16 factories in Shenzhen, China. There were 1805 nonlocal workers, which we defined as migrant workers with a mean age of 32.50 ± 8.43 years old who were 67.3% male. The structure of the Chinese version of the INQ-15 and its correlation and predictive utility for suicidal ideation were examined through factor analysis, the Item Response Theory, the M2 test, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Different from studies among various samples in which a two-factor solution is identified, results within this sample indicated three factors: perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and social isolation. The model fit statistics of three-factor INQ were 0.075 for RMSEA, 0.945 for CFI, 0.932 for TLI, and 0.067 for SRMR. The model standard estimated factor loadings ranged from 0.366 to 0.869. The summed scores of INQ and perceived burdensomeness predicted suicidal ideation after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, and income with AUC of 0.733 (95% CI: 0.712/0.754) and 0.786 (95% CI: 0.766/0.804). In the meantime, the comparison of the predictive ability between INQ total scores and PB scores was significant with p < 0.05. Conclusion: The INQ has good psychometric properties and can be used to assess how migrant workers living in the Shenzhen perceive meeting interpersonal psychological needs and shows good predictive ability of suicidal ideation. Perceived burdensomeness appears to play a role in suicide and may be a point of intervention, yet the notable deviation from previous findings and the relative weakness of two of the other factors warrant further study.

1. Background

With global economic integration, international and intranational migration is common [1]. Economic reform in China and the transition to a market economy resulting in massive internal migration as workers were allowed to move from rural areas to the economically productive areas. Eastern and coastal regions in the Pearl River Delta including Shenzhen were major destinations for migrants from impoverished western and central inland areas of China. The nationwide internal migrant population reached 0.26 billion in 2010 [2]. According to the National Seventh Population Census, approximately 70% of resident population in Shenzhen are mobile people [3]. Migrants are at the bottom of the social ladder and are discriminated against, have a high prevalence of mental health problems, and have experienced a high incidence of suicide [4]. Suicide accounts for approximately 800,000 global deaths each year and is a serious global public health problem that needs to be addressed [5]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that the suicide rate in 2016 was 10.6 per 100,000 people, with 80% of these suicides occurring in low- and middle-income countries [6]. Death by suicide additionally produces a profound emotional impact on bereaved loved ones [7,8]. Understanding the causes of suicide, and best practices for assessing, preventing, and treating suicidal behavior, has been identified as a key public health priority and global imperative [9,10] The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (IPTS) proposes that suicide occurs with two constructs, namely the acquired capacity for lethal self-injury and the desire to die, neither of which alone is sufficient to cause an individual to die by suicide [11,12]. The most dangerous form of suicidal ideation is caused by the simultaneous presence of two interpersonal constructs—thwarted belongingness (TB) and perceived burdensomeness (PB). TB describes the unmet need of being socially integrated, and PB reflects the perception of being a burden for others [13].
The Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) was developed to assess the main constructs (TB and PB) of the IPTS for predicting suicidal desire [14]. The factor structure of the INQ has been validated by many researchers and among different populations [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. However, results have been inconsistent, with most studies validating a better model fit for the two dimensions of the INQ [18,23,24,25,26], and some studies validating a better model fit for the three dimensions of the INQ [27]. Currently, most studies on suicide focus on students [28,29,30,31] and depressed patients [32,33,34], and few studies have been conducted on migrant industrial workers, whose population reached 174 million in 2019, which was an important feature of China’s economic development [1]. Surveys have shown that 14.7% of migrant workers are at high risk of mental illness and may perceive unmet interpersonal needs, which are considered proximate and causal factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors [35]. One study estimated that from 2015 to 2017, the annual suicide rate among migrant workers in Zhongshan, China was 4.46/100,000, slightly higher than the city average (4.03/100,000) [36]. The successive incidents of suicides and deaths of migrant workers have drawn particular attention to the psychological conditions of young migrant workers on the production line [4]. In past studies, there have been several versions of the INQ, including 10-, 12-, 15-, and 25-item questionnaires [14,24,26,37,38], whereas Hill et al. recommended using the 15- or 10-item versions because these versions indicated the most consistent model fit in confirmatory factor analyses [39]. In this study, we primarily used the INQ-15 recommended by the Van Orden K.A. [14].
The aim of this study was to validate the reliability and validity of the INQ-15 among industrial workers in Shenzhen, China, thereby informing the application of the INQ-15 and indeed IPTS theory to the Chinese population. To this end, a series of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), measurement methodology framework of the Item Response Theory (IRT), logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted. While the structure of the INQ has been confirmed on a solid theoretical basis by Van Orden et al. [14], we believe that it is crucial to validate the translated version in the Chinese population and that the results may vary. Following factor analysis, we examined the psychometric properties of the TB and PB and their related constructs by comparing them and examining whether they accurately predicted suicidal ideation or whether one of the constructs had better predictive power.

2. Method

2.1. Participants and Procedures

A cross-sectional survey of industrial workers in Shenzhen (China’s largest migrant city) was conducted from October to December 2019. A stratified multi-stage sampling method was used for recruitment from 16 factories and 513,215 industrial workers.
Assuming a prevalence of past-year suicidal ideation in migrant workers of 15% [18,33,34], using α of 0.05, and a relative error for sampling of 0.1, we calculated a required sample size of 1533 to allow for a non-response rate of 50%.
First, 16 factories, including 4 machinery processing factories, 3 electronic device manufacturing factories, 3 printing and dyeing factories, 2 chemical material factories, 1 smelting factory, 1 garment factory, 1 food and beverage manufacturing factory, and 1 other factory were randomly selected. Full-time employees aged ≥18 years in 3 to 4 workshops from each factory were then randomly invited to participate in a survey conducted at the Longhua District Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Each participant signed a written informed consent and was informed of the potential benefits and risks of participating by trained fieldworkers before the survey. Since the questionnaire contained questions about their mental health, the researcher provided respondents with assurance of anonymity during the survey, the right to quit at any time, and that there would be no consequences for refusing the survey. Each participant who spent approximately 30 min to complete a survey in a private room would be compensated with a USD 2.60 cash voucher.
A group of two public health researchers, an epidemiologist, a health psychologist, a health communication expert, and a factory worker designed the questionnaire. Twenty workers were invited to participate in a pilot study under the instruction of trained researchers. Some reading and comprehension problems were recorded in the process and the questionnaire was revised and finalized based on their feedback. These 20 workers did not participate in the final survey.

2.2. Instruments and Measures

The study collected sociodemographic information on workers’ age, gender, place of origin, monthly income, living alone or not, and time staying in Shenzhen, and used the following self-reporting tools.

2.2.1. Chinese Version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 (INQ-15)

The 15-item INQ, a self-report scale, published by Van Orden K.A. [14] and translated by Cao [35], was used to measure thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. Previous research on the two-dimensional INQ-15 scale has shown that the first six items measure perceived burdensomeness and the last nine items measure thwarted belongingness. Participants were asked to indicate how true each item had recently become for them. A 7-point Likert scale was used, ranging from “not true for me at all” to “very true for me”. Six items on the TB scale were reverse scored and total scores were coded, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived burdensomeness or thwarted belonging. The INQ-15 has been shown to predict suicidal ideation [13]. The subscales have demonstrated good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 for PB, and 0.81 to 0.87 for TB [39,40].

2.2.2. The Suicidal Ideation Scale

The suicidal ideation scale consists of three questions: “Have you considered suicide in the past year?”; “Have you planned suicide in the past year?”; and “Have you committed or almost committed suicide in the past year?”. In this study, anyone who answered “yes” to any of these three questions was considered to be at risk of suicide. A previous study has shown that single-item assessments of suicidal ideation are significantly associated with total suicidal ideation scores from multiple assessments [41].

2.3. Ethics Approval

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University (2019/3).

3. Data Analysis

All completed questionnaires were recorded by two people via Epidata (The EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark). Means and standard deviations are reported for normally distributed data. A review of kurtosis and skewness indicated that INQ-15 scores were not normally distributed; therefore, non-parametric tests and medians (interquartile range; IQR) are reported throughout the analysis. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted using Mplus 8 (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Robust maximum likelihood (MLR) estimators robust to non-normal data [42] and oblique rotations allowing for correlation of the examined factors [42] were applied. The IRT allows one to maintain only those items that contribute unique variance in the measured construct, making it possible to provide more precise psychometric understanding of each item’s contribution to an overall mean score [43]. Data screening and regression analyses were performed using SPSS version 25 (IBM, Armonk, New York, NY, USA). To assess the accuracy of the INQ-15 total score (sum of items) and subscale scores in predicting suicidal ideation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted.
Several fit indices were considered, since each index of model fit has unique properties that give rise to strengths and weaknesses: two absolute fit indices, the chi-square (χ2) and the standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR); two comparative fit indices, the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI); and a parsimonious-corrected fit index for root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA).
All fit statistics were associated with the MLR estimator of Mplus, and the reported chi-square was the Yuan–Bentler chi-square [41]. CFI and TLI values > 0.90 and RMSEA and SRMR values < 0.08 were identified as acceptable model fit metrics in this study [44,45].

4. Results

Of 2700 workers selected, 2023 completed a self-administered questionnaire. The response rate was 75%. Since we focused on migrant workers, local workers and those who did not report their homeland were excluded. Eventually 1805 migrant workers were included, as shown in Figure 1. The participant age range was from 18 to 61, the mean age was 32.50 (SD: 8.43), and 67.3% of them were male. All participants were randomly split in two groups with equal numbers. The first group including 874 workers was used for exploratory factor analysis. The mean age was 32.43 (SD: 8.41) and 67.6% of them were male. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the second group including 931 workers with a mean age of 32.56 (SD: 8.44) who were 66.9% male.
Descriptive statistics and intercorrelations of the INQ items for all participants are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2. The result of the Shapiro–Wilk test (p < 0.001 for all 15 INQ items) suggested that responses of the 15 INQ items were not normally distributed. Therefore, estimators of robust to non-normality were used.

5. Factor Structure of the Interpersonal Need Questionnaire

5.1. The Exploratory Factor Analysis

As expected, multiple items of the INQ were skewed positively, implying that the INQ measured non-normally distributed. Most items especially those of the same factor were significantly correlated, supporting appropriate internal consistencies, except for item 1/2 with item 13, item 3/4 with item 14 and item 15, and item 5 with item 13.
The results of the exploratory factor analysis 1–4, as displayed in Table 2, showed that the three-factor and four-factor model demonstrated better model fits. However, the factor loading of a three-factor model had better indicators for each item than four-factor model. The pattern of loadings for this model in Sample 1 indicated that the first six items and items 9/11/12 clearly loaded onto a “PB” factor, which means the three items written to measure thwarted belongingness cross-loaded onto perceived burdensomeness. Items 7/8/10 loaded onto thwarted belongingness, a “TB” factor, and the last three items strongly loaded on a third factor, which we named “social isolation”, an “SI” factor. The oblique rotated loadings for three-factor model are showed in Table 3.

5.2. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Fit statistics for the CFA in Sample 2 are presented in Table 2. The fit statistics for original three-factor model in Sample 2 did not meet the acceptable criteria proposed before. Therefore, the model was refined according to the modification index. The inclusion of residual correlations between the items 1 and 2 and between the items 11 and 12 improved the fit of the model clearly, as shown in Table 3. The values of both RMSEA and SRMR were below 0.08. In addition, the CFI and TLI values exceeded the cutoff score of 0.90, supporting a good model fit. The χ2 value was still significant and the χ2/df value was still higher than acceptable level. However, the χ2 value has been constantly criticized for its sensitivity to sample size [46] as the χ2 value will always be significant, resulting in the rejection of the model fit in large samples. Due to the controversy, the χ2 value was given less attention when it conflicted with other model fit indices.
Estimated parameters for the refined model (standardized estimated factor loadings SE, covariances, and R2 values) are presented in Table 4. All items loaded onto the anticipated latent variable significantly with R2 ranging from 0.13 to 0.81. Along with the model fit indices, parameter estimates supported the three-factor model of the INQ-15. There was a positive correlation between the “SI” and the “TB” factor but negative correlations between the “PB” and “TB” or “SI” factor.

5.3. IRT Modeling and M2 Test

The RMSEA of the M2 test of the model was <0.001, which was far below 0.08, while the p-value was 0.74, indicating good model fit of the IRT modeling.

5.4. Predictive Validity of the INQ

Logistic regression analysis (forward:LR) showed that the total scores of the INQ predicted suicidal ideation, with an OR = 1.084 (95% CI: 1.059/1.110), after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. For our data, the self-reported rate of suicidal ideation was 3.4%, and using the INQ-15 summed item scores to assess suicidal ideation produced an AUC = 0.733 (95% CI: 0.712/0.754), as shown in Figure 3. Contrary to other studies [16,21] only the main effect of PB proved to be valid, with an OR = 1.094 (95% CI: 1.069/1.112) and with an AUC of 0.786 (95% CI: 0.766/0.804). In addition, the comparison of the predictive ability between the INQ total scores and PB scores was significant with p < 0.05. The cut-offs were 53 for the INQ score (sensitivity: 54.10; specificity: 82.97) and 18 for the PB score (sensitivity: 75.41; specificity: 71.62).

6. Discussion

This study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 among industrial workers and comprehensively test the association of interpersonal needs with suicidal ideation. Even though a growing number of studies have used the INQ to examine the applicability of the Interpersonal Psychological Theory of Suicide, as well as to examine its validity in different countries and various populations [17,22,24,26,27,29,38,39,47,48], the application of IPTS and INQ among Chinese people is rare [49,50]. Considering the collectivistic culture in China and the difference of INQ across cultures [51], we reasoned it was necessary to validate the INQ in a sample of industrial workers, whose suicide events caused great social attention in the past years.
The result of exploratory factor analysis showed a three-factor model demonstrated better model fit and factor loading, which is different from most existing studies [14,19,21,51]. As the INQ-15 was developed as an English language instrument for measuring interpersonal needs, cultural adaptation should be considered. Yeonsoo Park et. al.’s results implied that the reading of an item, and ultimately the experience of specific psychological states, can vary depending on cultural influence [16]. In a Slovene translation and validation study, the researchers chose to omit items loaded weakly on its hypothesized factor and reduced INQ 15 to INQ 12 [47]. However, Quintin A. Hunt et al. extracted a third factor of perceived isolation “PI”, formed from the TB factors instead of omitting them in a sample of clinically depressed and suicidal youth [27]. Meanwhile, it is also worth noting that most industrial workers in Shenzhen come from different cities and float around across the country. Most of their friends and social connections are in their hometown and people they work with are thus unfamiliar. So, it is possible that social isolation may exist if a specific population are removed from their living environment.
The CFA confirmed that perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and social isolation are distinct but related, with thwarted belongingness and social isolation being closely related. The initial model demonstrated poor fit. However, when allowing two pairs of items to covary, the fit indices improved to excellent. Items 1 (i.e., “These days, the people in my life would be better off if I were gone”) and 2 (i.e., “These days, the people in my life would be happier without me”) refer to the positive effects of an individual’s death on others; items 11 (i.e., “These days, I feel disconnected from other people”) and 12 (i.e., “These days, I often feel like an outsider in social gatherings”) refer to the relationship between the self and outsiders. Because each pair shared a common theme, we reasoned that allowing the pair of items to covary would be acceptable just like other research [17,52]. The IRT modeling and M2 test approved the procedure. In our study, the TB was significantly negatively associated with PB and positively correlated with SI, and we interpreted such relationships to be due to the difficulty participants may have had dealing with reverse-coded questions.
In line with the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior [12], the results of the current study suggest that the INQ strongly predicts desire for suicide. As socioeconomic factors including relative income [53,54] have been associated with suicidal behaviors, we re-ran a regression analysis to identify a unique contribution of INQ to suicidal ideation and the relation was still significant. Meanwhile, the effect of PB and TB was significant, before and after controlling for demographic characteristics. These results are in accordance with the theory, which assumes that all constructs are needed in order for suicidal ideation to develop [11,14], and the findings of some previous studies also support it [13,55]. Consistent with Mitchell et al. [56] and Jeffrey B. Brookings et al.’s findings, the results of the ROC analysis indicate that the INQ-15 may be useful and PB may be better in detecting suicidal ideation among individuals. Individuals whose INQ scores exceeded 53 or PB scores exceeded 18 may be at high risk of suicidal ideation and in need of help. In this study, a hotline number was given to all workers in case they needed psychological counseling. However, the INQ-15 was not developed as a screening tool. It was thus difficult to apply cut-off scores to measure suicidal ideation in reality.
Limitations of this study are that it focuses on migrant workers in Shenzhen only and that we did not repeat the survey to get the test-retest reliability; thus, the findings cannot be generalized to average populations in China. However, we did use a larger sample in our study, so the results may provide a worthy reference for the application of INQ-15 in large-sample population surveys. Second, since the culture effect has been demonstrated [16,51] and the Chinese version of INQ-15 was used in this study, the culture effect and translation influence were not tested. Third, the three questions measured short-time suicidal ideation rather than life-time suicidal ideation. However, the mean time the investigated workers were staying in Shenzhen was 6.24 years (SD: 6.34), so it was reasonable for the INQ to predict short-time suicidal ideation.

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, the INQ has good psychometric properties and can be used to assess how industrial workers living in the Shenzhen perceive meeting interpersonal psychological needs. To our knowledge, it is the first study to validate the Chinese version of INQ-15 in a sample consisting of migrant workers, and the validation of the scale among migrants is the first step necessary to test the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide on a specific population. The translated INQ confirmed three distinguishable and internally consistent factors corresponding to PB, TB, and SI, and predicted suicidal ideation properly. Future studies may seek to develop norms or cut-off scores at which elevated scores on the INQ-Chinese would indicate an elevated risk for suicide and focus on interventions in this process to prevent suicide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: K.Z. and H.Z.; Methodology and formal analysis: R.W., Y.C. (Yexin Chen) and F.H.; Investigation: Z.W., B.C., T.H. and Y.C. (Yaqi Chen); Data curation: Y.L., S.L., H.C., C.X. and X.Y.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.W., Y.C.(Yong Cai) and F.H.; Writing—review and editing, R.C. and H.W.; Project administration and supervision: Y.C. (Yong Cai). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Shanghai Three-Year Action Plan for Public Health under Grant (GWV-10.1-XK18, GWV-10.2-XD13); the High-Level Project of Medicine in Longhua, Shenzhen (HLPM201907020105); and the Strategic collaborative innovation team (SSMU-ZLCX20180601).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University (2019/3).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request due to privacy and ethical restrictions. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to protection of participants’ privacy.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Shanghai Three-Year Action Plan for Public Health under Grant (GWV-10.1-XK18, GWV-10.2-XD13); the High-Level Project of Medicine in Longhua, Shenzhen (HLPM201907020105); and the Strategic collaborative innovation team (SSMU-ZLCX20180601). We acknowledge all participants involved in our research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Migrant Workers Monitoring Survey Report in 2019. 2019. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202004/t20200430_1742724.html (accessed on 14 January 2021).
  2. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Tabulation on the 2010 Population Census of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/pcsj/rkpc/6rp/indexch.htm (accessed on 14 January 2021).
  3. Bureau of Statistics of Shenzhen. Shenzhen Seventh National Census Bulletin. 2021. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202105/t20210510_1817185.html (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  4. Lau, J.T.; Cheng, Y.; Gu, J.; Zhou, R.; Yu, C.; Holroyd, E.; Yeung, N.C. Suicides in a mega-size factory in China: Poor mental health among young migrant workers in China. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 69, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Health Organization. World Suicide. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4664 (accessed on 14 January 2021).
  6. World Health Organization. Suicide in the World: Global Health Estimates; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pitman, A.; Osborn, D.; King, M.; Erlangsen, A. Effects of suicide bereavement on mental health and suicide risk. Lancet Psychiatry 2014, 1, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cerel, J.; Jordan, J.R.; Duberstein, P.R. The impact of suicide on the family. J. Crisis Interv. Suicide Prev. 2008, 29, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pridmore, S.; Auchincloss, S. Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Australas. Psychiatry 2015, 23, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caine, E.D. Forging an agenda for suicide prevention in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 103, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Van Orden, K.A.; Witte, T.K.; Cukrowicz, K.C.; Braithwaite, S.R.; Selby, E.A.; Joiner, T.E., Jr. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 117, 575–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Joiner, T.E. Why People Die by Suicide; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Orden, K.A.; Witte, T.K.; Gordon, K.H.; Bender, T.W.; Joiner, T.E., Jr. Suicidal desire and the capability for suicide: Tests of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior among adults. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2008, 76, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Van Orden, K.A.; Cukrowicz, K.C.; Witte, T.K.; Joiner, T.E. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: Construct validity and psychometric properties of the interpersonal needs questionnaire. Psychol. Assess. 2012, 24, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Silva, C.; Hurtado, G.; Hartley, C.; Rangel, J.N.; Hovey, J.D.; Pettit, J.W.; Chorot, P.; Valiente, R.M.; Sandin, B.; Joiner, T.E. Spanish translation and validation of the interpersonal needs questionnaire. Psychol. Assess. 2018, 30, E21–E37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, Y.; Kim, H.S. Validation of the Korean version interpersonal needs questionnaire. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2019, 49, 739–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hallensleben, N.; Spangenberg, L.; Kapusta, N.D.; Forkmann, T.; Glaesmer, H. The German version of the interpersonal needs questionnaire (INQ)—Dimensionality, psychometric properties and population-based norms. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 195, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chu, C.; Buchman-Schmitt, J.M.; Hom, M.A.; Stanley, I.H.; Joiner, T.E. A test of the interpersonal theory of suicide in a large sample of current firefighters. Psychiatry Res. 2016, 240, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Teo, D.C.H.; Suarez, L.; Oei, T.P.S. Validation of the interpersonal needs questionnaire of young male adults in Singapore. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shim, Y.; Choe, K.A.-O.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, J.A.-O.; Ha, J.A.-O. The applicability of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide among community-dwelling older persons. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2021, 210, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seo, J.A.-O. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness in Korean college students: Psychometric properties and cultural considerations for the interpersonal needs questionnaire-10. Death Stud. 2019, 5, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Iliceto, P.A.-O.; D’Antuono, L.A.-O.; Fino, E.A.-O.; Carcione, A.A.-O.X.; Candilera, G.; Silva, C.A.-O.; Joiner, T.A.-O. Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the interpersonal needs questionnaire-15 (INQ-15-I). J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 77, 268–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. El-Behadli, A.F.; Beitra, D.; Zullo, L.; Mbroh, H.; Stewart, S.M. Measuring thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness in clinically depressed and suicidal youth: Refinement and reduction of the interpersonal needs questionnaire. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2019, 49, 1463–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Costa, S.; Campos, R.C.; Simoes, A.; Pio, A.S. Validation studies of the interpersonal needs questionnaire (INQ-15) to the Portuguese population. Rev. Iberoam. Diagn. Eval. Aval. Psicol. 2019, 4, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gutierrez, P.M.; Pease, J.; Matarazzo, B.B.; Monteith, L.L.; Hernandez, T.; Osman, A. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the interpersonal needs questionnaire and the acquired capability for suicide scale in military veterans. Psychol. Assess. 2016, 28, 1684–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Freedenthal, S.; Lamis, D.A.; Osman, A.; Kahlo, D.; Gutierrez, P.M. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the interpersonal needs questionnaire-12 in samples of men and women. J. Clin. Psychol. 2011, 67, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hunt, Q.A.; Weiler, L.M.; McGuire, J.; Mendenhall, T.; Kobak, R.; Diamond, G.S. Testing basic assumptions of the interpersonal needs questionnaire-15 in a sample of clinically depressed and suicidal youth. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2020, 50, 372–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Loas, G.; Solibieda, A.; Moens, K.; Rotsaert, M.; Englert, Y. Interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide: Study on 178 medical students. Ann. Med. Psychol. 2021, 179, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Becker, S.P.; Foster, J.A.; Luebbe, A.M. A test of the interpersonal theory of suicide in college students. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 260, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Garlow, S.J.; Rosenberg, J.; Moore, J.D.; Haas, A.P.; Koestner, B.; Hendin, H.; Nemeroff, C.B. Depression, desperation, and suicidal ideation in college students: Results from the American foundation for suicide prevention college screening project at Emory University. Depress. Anxiety 2008, 25, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Quan, J.; Yu, X.; Cai, Y.; Tu, D. Comparison of psychometric characteristics for five versions of the interpersonal needs questionnaire in teenagers sample. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, X.F.; Cheng, S.X.; Xu, H.L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between sleep disorders and suicidal behaviour in patients with depression. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Fredriksen, K.J.; Schoeyen, H.K.; Johannessen, J.O.; Walby, F.A.; Davidson, L.; Schaufel, M.A. Psychotic depression and suicidal behavior. Psychiatry Interpers. Biol. Process. 2017, 80, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hawton, K.; Comabella, C.C.I.; Haw, C.; Saunders, K. Risk factors for suicide in individuals with depression: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2013, 147, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mengqi, C. Exploring the Applicability of the Interpersonal Model of Suicide in College Students and Older Adults. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  36. Deng Lanfang, Y.J.; Huang, C.; Zhang, J.; Du, B. Characteristics of suicide rate and suicide mode among floating population and registered population in Zhongshan. Sichuan Ment. Health 2020, 33, 4. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ordonez-Carrasco, J.L.; Salgueiro, M.; Sayans-Jimenez, P.; Blanc-Molina, A.; Garcia-Leiva, J.M.; Calandre, E.P.; Rojas, A.J. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the 12-item interpersonal needs questionnaire in fibromyalgia syndrome patients. An. Psicol. 2018, 34, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Allan, N.P.; Gros, D.F.; Hom, M.A.; Joiner, T.E.; Stecker, T. Suicidal ideation and interpersonal needs: Factor structure of a short version of the interpersonal needs questionnaire in an at-risk military sample. Psychiatry Interpers. Biol. Process. 2016, 79, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hill, R.M.; Rey, Y.; Marin, C.E.; Sharp, C.; Green, K.L.; Pettit, J.W. Evaluating the interpersonal needs questionnaire: Comparison of the reliability, factor structure, and predictive validity across five versions. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2015, 45, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hill, R.M.; Pettit, J.W. The role of autonomy needs in suicidal ideation: Integrating the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide and self-determination theory. Arch. Suicide Res. 2013, 17, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Desseilles, M.; Perroud, N.; Guillaume, S.; Jaussent, I.; Genty, C.; Malafosse, A.; Courtet, P. Is it valid to measure suicidal ideation by depression rating scales? J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 136, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Osborne, J.W.; Costello, A.B. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan Pac. Manag. Rev. 2009, 12, 15. [Google Scholar]
  43. Embretson, S.E.; Reise, S.P. Item Response Theory for Psychologists; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brown, M.W.; Cudeck, R.; Bollen, K.A.; Long, J.S. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit; Sage Publishing: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  46. Brown, T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  47. Podlogar, T.; Ziberna, J.; Postuvan, V.; Kerr, D.C.R. Belongingness and burdensomeness in adolescents: Slovene translation and validation of the interpersonal needs questionnaire. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2017, 47, 336–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cero, I.; Zuromski, K.L.; Witte, T.K.; Ribeiro, J.D.; Joiner, T.E. Perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and suicide ideation: Re-examination of the interpersonal-psychological theory in two samples. Psychiatry Res. 2015, 228, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, X.M.; Xin, T.G.; Yuan, J.; Lv, L.X.; Tao, J.Y.; Liu, Y. Validity and reliability of the interpersonal needs questionnaire in Chinese college students. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 2015, 23, 4. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lai, C.C.W.; Boag, S. Chinese versions of the interpersonal needs questionnaire: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance across gender and cultures. PsyCh J. 2021, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Glaesmer, H.; Spangenberg, L.; Scherer, A.; Forkmann, T. Assessing desire for suicide: First results on psychometric properties of the German version of the interpersonal needs questionnaire (INQ). Psychiatr. Prax. 2014, 41, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lafuente-Castro, C.P.; Ordonez-Carrasco, J.L.; Garcia-Leiva, J.M.; Salgueiro-Macho, M.; Calandre, E.P. Perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and suicidal ideation in patients with fibromyalgia and healthy subjects: A cross-sectional study. Rheumatol. Int. 2018, 38, 1479–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Daly, M.C.; Wilson, D.J.; Johnson, N.J. Relative status and well-being: Evidence form U.S. suicide deaths. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2013, 95, 1480–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Qin, P.; Agerbo, E.; Mortensen, P.B. Suicide risk in relation to socioeconomic, demographic, psychiatric, and familial factors: A national register-based study of all suicides in Denmark, 1981–1997. Am. J. Psychiatry 2003, 160, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Christensen, H.; Batterham, P.J.; Mackinnon, A.J.; Donker, T.; Soubelet, A. Predictors of the risk factors for suicide identified by the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behaviour. Psychiatry Res. 2014, 219, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mitchell, S.M.; Brown, S.L.; Roush, J.F.; Bolanos, A.D.; Littlefield, A.K.; Marshall, A.J.; Jahn, D.R.; Morgan, R.D.; Cukrowicz, K.C. The clinical application of suicide risk assessment: A theory-driven approach. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2017, 24, 1406–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Participants recruitment flow chart.
Figure 1. Participants recruitment flow chart.
Ijerph 18 07583 g001
Figure 2. Intercorrelations among INQ Items. (n = 1805).
Figure 2. Intercorrelations among INQ Items. (n = 1805).
Ijerph 18 07583 g002
Figure 3. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire as a predictor of suicide ideation (n = 1805).
Figure 3. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire as a predictor of suicide ideation (n = 1805).
Ijerph 18 07583 g003
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of industrial workers. (n = 1805).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of industrial workers. (n = 1805).
Sociodemographic CharacteristicsNumber (%)
Gender
Male1214 (67.3)
Female591 (32.7)
Education
Less than high school1059 (58.6)
High school585 (32.4)
College degree or above113 (6.3)
Unknown48 (2.7)
Income (RMB)
<3000166 (9.2)
3000–49991099 (60.9)
>4999484 (26.8)
Unknown56 (3.1)
Staying time in Shenzhen (years)
<101471 (81.5)
10–20231 (12.8)
>20103 (5.7)
Living with others
Relatives944 (52.3)
Living alone592 (32.8)
Unknown269 (14.9)
Suicidal ideation
Yes61 (3.4)
No1744 (96.6)
Table 2. Fit statistics for EFA/CFA models.
Table 2. Fit statistics for EFA/CFA models.
Modelχ2dfp-ValueRMSEA90% CICFITLISRMR
EFAone-factor2253.78890<0.0010.1660.160–0.1720.4950.4110.188
two-factor869.49576<0.0010.1090.103–0.1160.8150.7440.060 a
three-factor511.12663<0.0010.0900.083–0.0980.8950.8260.041 a
four-factor323.74851<0.0010.078 a0.070–0.0860.936 a0.8690.025 a
CFAthree-factor917.03387<0.0010.1010.095–0.1070.8970.8760.074 a
three-factor refined529.39485<0.0010.075 a0.069–0.0810.945 a0.932 a0.067 a
a Fit indicator is within acceptable limits. Three-factor refined = INQ-15 with covariances.
Table 3. Oblique rotated loadings for three-factor model for Sample 1 (n = 874).
Table 3. Oblique rotated loadings for three-factor model for Sample 1 (n = 874).
ItemDescriptionPBTBSI
Item 1These days the people in my life would be better off if I were gone0.727 *
Item 2These days the people in my life would be happier without me0.798 *
Item 3These days I think I am a burden on society0.789 *
Item 4These days I think my death would be a relief to the people in my life0.875 *
Item 5These days I think the people in my life wish they could be rid of me0.880 *
Item 6These days I think I make things worse for the people in my life0.725 *
Item 7These days, other people care about me 0.639 *
Item 8These days, I feel like I belong 0.615 *
Item 9These days, I rarely interact with people who care about me0.400 *
Item 10These days, I am fortunate to have many caring and supportive friends 0.549 *
Item 11These days, I feel disconnected from other people0.496 *
Item 12These days, I often feel like an outsider in social gatherings0.483 *
Item 13These days, I feel that there are people I can turn to in times of need 0.757 *
Item 14These days, I am close to other people 0.829 *
Item 15These days, I have at least one satisfying interaction every day 0.855 *
* significant at 5% level.
Table 4. Model estimated factor loadings, covariances, p-value and R-squares in Sample 2 (n = 931).
Table 4. Model estimated factor loadings, covariances, p-value and R-squares in Sample 2 (n = 931).
EstimatedS.E.pR-sqItem-Total Correlation
Perceived Burdensomeness
Item 10.7300.017<0.0010.5320.452 *
Item 20.7810.014<0.0010.6100.497 *
Item 30.8210.012<0.0010.6740.566 *
Item 40.8690.010<0.0010.7550.589 *
Item 50.9010.008<0.0010.8110.565 *
Item 60.7130.018<0.0010.5080.511 *
Item 90.3660.030<0.0010.1340.260 *
Item 110.4300.028<0.0010.1850.334 *
Item 120.4710.027<0.0010.2220.391 *
Thwarted Belongingness
Item 70.8590.013<0.0010.7380.467 *
Item 80.8420.014<0.0010.7090.436 *
Item 100.7740.016<0.0010.6000.447 *
Social Isolation 0.613 *
Item 130.8060.016<0.0010.6490.605 *
Item 140.8360.015<0.0010.6990.502 *
Item 150.8020.016<0.0010.6430.496 *
Covariances
Item 1 with Item 20.3870.031<0.001
Item 11 with Item 120.5040.025<0.001
TB with PB−0.168 *0.036<0.001
SI with PB−0.0550.0370.136
SI with TB0.651 *0.025<0.001
* significant at 5% level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, R.; Chen, Y.; Hu, F.; Wang, Z.; Cao, B.; Xu, C.; Yu, X.; Chang, R.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; et al. Psychometric Properties of Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 for Predicting Suicidal Ideation among Migrant Industrial Workers in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147583

AMA Style

Wang R, Chen Y, Hu F, Wang Z, Cao B, Xu C, Yu X, Chang R, Wang H, Chen H, et al. Psychometric Properties of Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 for Predicting Suicidal Ideation among Migrant Industrial Workers in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(14):7583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147583

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Rongxi, Yexin Chen, Fan Hu, Zixin Wang, Bolin Cao, Chen Xu, Xiaoyue Yu, Ruijie Chang, Huwen Wang, Hui Chen, and et al. 2021. "Psychometric Properties of Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 for Predicting Suicidal Ideation among Migrant Industrial Workers in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 14: 7583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147583

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop