Next Article in Journal
The Role of Eco-Friendly Edible Insect Restaurants in the Field of Sustainable Tourism
Previous Article in Journal
In the Name of Family Medicine: A Nationwide Survey of Registered Names of Family Medicine Clinics in Taiwan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention among School Nurses

1
School of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taoyuan City 33303, Taiwan
2
Department of Nursing Management, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, School of Nursing, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33303, Taiwan
3
Chang Gung University Science and Technology, Taoyuan City 33303, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(11), 4063; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114063
Submission received: 1 May 2020 / Revised: 3 June 2020 / Accepted: 5 June 2020 / Published: 7 June 2020

Abstract

:
The evidence-based practice (EBP) approach to high-quality care is designed to improve patient outcomes. However, little research has been conducted to determine how EBP is adopted and implemented among school nurses in Taiwan. This study evaluated an EBP training program implemented among school nurses in Taiwan to determine whether and how effectively it improved their knowledge levels, attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy. A pretest-posttest research design was employed. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from among 193 primary schools throughout Tao-Yuan and New Taipei City in Taiwan. The EBP program implemented both mobile learning technology and the flipped classroom format. The learning outcomes were evaluated before, immediately after, and at a 3-month follow-up. In this regard, the data were collected using the School Nurse Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire. The results showed that the participant scores for the items of knowledge and self-efficacy significantly increased over the study period. Somewhat differently, scores for the skill items significantly increased from the pre-test to the immediate post-test, but significantly decreased from the immediate post-test to the final follow-up. Overall, however, the EBP program led to marked improvements in knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy. These findings can help guide the development of a creative evidence-based school nursing curriculum.

1. Introduction

Evidence-based practice (EBP) has become an important trend in the health care field [1]. For instance, it can improve the quality of patient care, satisfy societal demands for certain types of care, and reduce care costs, thus making it a notably useful model for addressing 21st-century medical care needs [2]. As such, there have been strong efforts to implement EBP in Taiwan. In Taiwan, EBP has been included in foundation nursing education in Bachelor’s degrees as a core competence since 2013 [3], and it is now a core competency for clinical nursing staff [3,4,5,6]. EBP is a recent new trend in Taiwanese nursing education, and in Hsieh’s national survey of 1200 primary school nurses, 81% of them responded that they had not received an EBP-related course [7]. Nowadays, new EBP is a new era in clinical care, and therefore we expect to see the implementation of EBP and promotion campaigns for school nurses. Further, the Ministry of Education Taiwan [8] has developed an evidence-based second-generation health promotion school mechanism that prioritizes the utilization of evidence from successfully established school health-promotion programs as the basis for executing other such programs and evaluating school health policies. As executors in this process, school nurses play a vital role during implementation. A national survey was conducted among 247 school nurses in the United States to determine the status of EBP implementation in the school nursing environment, thus identifying that the participants had insufficient EBP skills, lacked necessary support systems, and had insufficient resources [9]. The participants also mentioned the paucities of EBP skills, resources, structures, and support mechanisms for schools when developing EBP. Since children and adolescents are valuable human assets for any country, it is important for schools to support them by adopting flexible strategies to promote children’s health. Studies have already shown that school-based health promotion programs play major roles in establishing healthy behavior [10,11]. Because school nurses are key persons in this regard, they are expected to have appropriate knowledge and apply established research findings when managing children’s needs during health education and when implementing prevention programs [12]. It is therefore vital for school nurses to recognize the importance of and apply EBP in their schools.
The EBP program was comprised of the five following steps: (1) ask a question, (2) find information/evidence to answer the question, (3) critically appraise the information/evidence, (4) integrate the appraised evidence using your own clinical expertise and patient preferences, and (5) evaluate [13]. Many medical centers in Taiwan have established evidence-based practice centers, organized national EBP seminars and workshops, created webpages, and formed promotion groups to facilitate EBP education and training [14,15,16]. Lin [17] even incorporated EBP into hospital nursing guidelines and a nursing auditing system. Further, Taiwanese scholars have advocated for the inclusion of EBP into basic education programs for new nursing recruits. Many have also recommended including EBP performance ability as an evaluation criterion for nursing staff, formulating different levels of EBP reports, and establishing a corresponding education and training mechanism [18,19,20]. However, few studies have investigated EBP performance levels among school nurses. As such, this study was conducted to investigate the issue and draw attention to the related research gap.
Education and training can improve EBP skills and knowledge among nursing staff, thereby facilitating clinical implementation. The current literature shows that EBP education and training approaches now include evidence-based training courses [21,22,23], lectures [24,25], seminars [23,26], journal clubs [27,28], practical exercises [16,29], and group counseling [23,28]. Studies have already provided evidence that sufficient EBP education and training programs should include both classroom teaching and practical exercise, as the latter component demonstrates better effectiveness in improving student knowledge levels, skills, and attitudes [1,30]. Different approaches can also be adopted based on the specific learning requirements of individual students (e.g., self-learning and question-oriented learning), which further improves learning effectiveness [21]. The literature suggests that core competencies can substantially improve in the area of evidence-based knowledge by combining blended learning and flipped-classroom methods via the implementation of multiple classroom activities, including case analyses, scenario-based learning, and practical exercises [31,32]. Furthermore, several related studies have demonstrated that blended learning significantly improved skill development and self-reported learning abilities among students [33,34,35,36]. To a certain extent, the flipped classroom is another format of blended learning, in which teachers interact with students rather than simply lecturing. Research has shown that the flipped classroom environment is positively related to learning effectiveness, especially in the areas of self-learning and problem-solving skills [37,38,39].
Overall, while EBP has fully been implemented among nurses working in the clinical practice setting, such application is wholly insufficient in the context of school nursing. The EBP training program investigated in this study was based on Hsieh, Chen, and Chan’s findings about related requirements for school nurses [7]. In this regard, the program differed from clinical EBP programs in one major area. That is, all the basic theories and case analyses were based on school nursing topics, thereby tailoring the program to facilitate learning motivation among school nurses. This study also attempted to incorporate mobile technologies and teaching resources that were specifically designed to increase EBP abilities among this demographic. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EBP training program on school nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study implemented a pretest-posttest research design. All the methods were approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Chang Gung Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan (approval number: 103-3678C). Further, all the participants provided their written informed consent prior to participation.

2.2. Participants

A total of 401 elementary school nurses were recruited from Tao-Yuan and New Taipei City in Taiwan via convenience sampling. Three hundred and thirty-six school nurses enrolled in the EBP training program, and 193 of them completed the 18 h training program. The inclusion criteria were set as follows: school nurses working in elementary schools and completing 18 h of the EBP training program. All others were excluded.

2.3. Intervention

This study received approval from both the Ministry of Education Taiwan and the Association of Chinese School Health Nursing. Further, the Association of Chinese School Health Nursing provided a list of school nurses working in both Tao-Yuan City and New Taipei City. Letters seeking permission and consent forms were sent and subsequently signed by both the Ministry of Education and the Association of Chinese School Health Nursing. The Ministry of Education then released a formal government document to inform elementary school nurses in Tao-Yuan City and New Taipei City that this study had received official support.
The intervention consisted of an evidence-based school nursing program that mainly focused on the five steps listed in the introduction (i.e., ask a question, find information/evidence to answer the question, critically appraise the information/evidence, integrate the appraised evidence via one’s own clinical expertise and patient preferences, and evaluate). The training program was a combination of several teaching strategies lectures, group activities that required the participants to be interactive, and supervision. The lectures were based on mobile learning technology, the flipped-classroom format, and the traditional in-class format. In this regard, approximately eight hours of class time were conducted online, while 10 h were conducted via the traditional in-class (face-to-face) format, and two hours consisted of online supervision support. We focused on outcome measures for evaluating the EBP training program, including knowledge, attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy at three points (i.e., baseline, post-training, and at 3-month follow-up). Table 1 provides a general outline of the educational components.

The Flipped Classroom Technology Implementation

The flipped classroom was divided into two learning environments: outside and inside the classroom. Outside the classroom was based on mobile learning and inside the classroom was based on group activities. Online lessons were recorded, and each lesson consisted of 6 units (Table 1). Each unit provides a 20 min video. Five quizzes were provided in the end of each online lesson to check the participants’ comprehensive reading. A set of six video-lessons could be accessed for two weeks. All the videos were accessible in the Share Course platform to support self-directed learning such as online status, the number of videos viewed, and the total number of videos viewed. Reminders were sent to participants telling them that they were running out of time and encouraging them to complete the lessons. The video formats were supported by various browsers, for example, Google, Android, and iPhone. The participants could easily access the learning materials on devices.
Following the online lesson, a lesson inside the classroom was offered and participants were divided into 24 groups; each group had 7–8 members. An instructor was in charge of 4 groups, and a total of 6 instructors were involved in the process. The instructors were qualified by the Taiwan Evidence-Based Medicine Association. The instructors took particularly controversial quiz questions from the online material, and participants reflected on them and then discussed them further. Afterwards, participants reviewed a case study concerning a school health-based scenario and applied what they learned in the online lessons; the group discussed how they would tackle the problem and what solution they would prepare. Each group debriefed and presented their solution. The instructor elicited responses from all the members of the groups and began to engage participants in a wider discussion, demonstrating the many different perspectives. This process took approximately three hours.

2.4. Instruments

This study used the previously established School Nurse Evidence-Based Practice (SNEBP) Questionnaire [7], which is comprised of five sections (demographic data, knowledge levels, attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy). The demographic data included age, education level, the duration of employment as a school nurse, participation in research-based and EBP training programs, and the frequency of reading journal articles. The knowledge section consisted of five multiple-choice items (true/false/I do not know); an incorrect or “I do not know” answer was assigned a score of 0, while a correct answer was assigned a 1. Here, higher scores indicated higher levels of EBP knowledge. The content validity index (CVI) value was 0.83 and the value of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.89. The attitudes section consisted of 12 items. All the items were answered on a 5-point Likert-scale, ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicated better attitudes. The content validity index (CVI) value was 0.97, and the value of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.82. The self-efficacy section consisted of 12 items. All the items were answered on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (no confidence) to 5 (complete confidence). Higher scores indicated a better self-efficacy. The content validity index (CVI) value was 0.87, and the value of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.84. The skill section consisted of 10 items. All the items were answered on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicated better skills. The content validity index (CVI) value was 0.97, and the value of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.94.
All the negatively worded items were reverse-coded. The construction of the SNEBP is detailed in a previous study that also established reliability, validity, and construct validity [7].

2.5. Statistical Analyses

All the statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics (percentages of frequencies, means, and standard deviations) were calculated to describe the distributions of responses for each item. Knowledge, attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy were assessed using a questionnaire that was administered at three time points (baseline, post-training, and at 3-month follow-up), while the program effectiveness was analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all tests.

3. Results

3.1. Participant Characteristics

A total of 193 elementary school nurses from either Tao-Yuan or New Taipei City in Taiwan participated in this study. All the participants were female. The mean participant age was 35.7 years (range of 26–58), while the mean duration of employment as a school nurse was 10.1 years (range of 1–20). Table 2 provides a basic outline of the participant demographic data. As shown, most had Bachelor’s degrees (72%), while more than 80% had not pursued advanced studies (80.3%). Furthermore, most had no experience with research programs (62.7%) and had not attended EBP training courses (64.8%). Many did not frequently read journal articles (68.9% had only done so several months prior, while 5.2% had not done so at all during the previous year). The main motivations for attending EBP training were personal interest (47%) and job requirements (35.2%). Table 3 shows the top five training courses attended during the previous year.

3.2. The Learning Effectiveness of EBP Training Over Time

Participants took the SNEBP questionnaire at all three time periods (baseline, post-training, and at 3-month follow-up) for the purpose of conducting comparisons. A repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the mean scores for both knowledge (F (2, 211.07) = 65.36, p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (F (2, 160.57) = 33.19, p < 0.001) significantly increased from baseline to follow-up. Next, a Bonferroni post hoc test revealed that knowledge scores increased by an average of 0.75 at post-training (p < 0.001), then further increased by 0.37 at follow-up (p < 0.001). Similarly, the self-efficacy scores increased by an average of 0.3 at post-training (p < 0.001), then further increased by 0.13 at follow-up (p < 0.001).
However, the skill factor showed different results. The mean scores for skill (F (2, 207.67) = 58.24, p < 0.001) varied significantly between baseline, post-training, and follow-up. Interestingly, the Bonferroni post hoc test revealed that the skill score significantly increased from baseline (mean = 3.73; SD = 0.58) to post-training (mean = 3.80; SD = 0.62), but then significantly decreased (by an average of 0.1) between post-training and follow-up (p < 0.001).
Finally, the scores for attitudes about EBP were not statistically significant at any time period. Table 4 shows descriptive statistics for the learning effectiveness of the EBP training program, while Table 5 provides a summary of the repeated-measures ANOVAs for each scale at the three time points.

4. Discussion

Unlike traditional classroom education methods that prioritize lecturing, the flipped classroom environment implements a learner-centered design. Prior to this, students gained self-learned knowledge through basic memory techniques and understanding. However, teachers who focus on guidance through innovative applications, analyses, evaluations, and the creation of higher-level experiences have found that students can learn to think at higher levels, which increases learning effectiveness [40,41,42]. In this study, the participants significantly improved their knowledge levels, skills, and self-efficacy based on follow-up evaluations after completing an EPB program. This indicates that implementing the flipped classroom environment during EBP training can successfully help school nurses achieve superior learning outcomes. Indeed, these findings are consistent with those of previous studies reporting that the flipped classroom was effective during training programs aimed at nurses and medical students. For instance, students can utilize their time during synchronous lessons to exchange views and solve questions via discussions held with teachers and other students while applying new practical knowledge through activities assigned by instructors, thereby improving the overall program effectiveness [36,43].
This study also found that the EBP skills were significantly higher immediately after the EBP training program (p < 0.05), but significantly decreased (from 3.80 to 3.70) based on the final follow-up results. After intervention, the school nurses might have felt that they were alone, without any requirements to apply EBP and the support that they had revived during the intervention phase. Possibly, they were also faced with barriers that hindered them applying EBP. In this study, we did not aim to identify EBP barriers. However, lack of time, lack of support system, lack of relevant resources, and lack of interest are frequently reported as barriers among nurses [44,45]. These barriers could explain why EBP skills were not sustained at follow-up. A previous study produced similar results, reporting that the most significant challenge in EBP implementation was the large gap between the application of knowledge from research sources and actual clinical practice [46]. It is essential to find ways of ensuing long-term change in EBP skills, and further studies need to take these barriers into account
In terms of self-efficacy when implementing EBP, scores significantly increased across all three time periods. Previous studies indicated that the self-efficacy of EBP was significantly correlated with education level and the duration of employment [7,45]. In our study, many school nurses had advanced degrees and the mean duration of employment as a school nurse was 10.1 years; these participant demographics may explain why the self-efficacy increased over time. Further, flipped classroom teaching gives students more opportunities to think critically [37]. The literature also shows that self-confidence can increase via this method [34,47]. However, 64.8% of this study’s participants had not attended any EBP training courses during the previous year, during which time very few relevant EBP courses had been included as part of their in-service training programs. Further, when asked about their motivation to participate in EBP training courses, 47.7% indicated personal interest, while 35.2% indicated that it was demanded by their job. These results show that it is urgent to conduct EBP training programs for school nurses. Although they are the only medical professionals working in schools, these school nurses lack access to the EBP training resources that nurses who work at medical institutions use. Relevant authorities (e.g., school nurse associations) should therefore address this issue by designing a series of training programs that are suitable for school nurses, thereby facilitating the implementation of EBP in the school nursing environment.

Limitations

This study had some limitations. All the participants were recruited from either Tao-Yuan or New Taipei City in Taiwan, which diminishes its generalizability. First, the self-report questionnaire may not provide accurate information, so outcome measures such as an individual written assignment should be used to ensure the integrated learning of EBP. Secondly, school nurses must overcome their reliance on traditional classroom teaching and be willing to accept the responsibility for self-learning that comes with a flipped class. However, the inclusion criteria in this study was participants who completed 18 h of an EBP training program. Finally, there were no male school nurses involved, and a gender bias may exist. In Taiwan, the total number of elementary school nurses are 2,679, and there are 97 male school nurses (3.62%) [48]. The number of male school nurses is relatively small, and it was not easy to involve them in the study.

5. Conclusions

Post-training results showed that mobile learning technology and flipped-classroom support led to marked improvements in EBP knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy. However, the mean score for skills dropped based on the final follow-up results. Outcome measures, such as an individual written assignment or a case report, should be used to improve the long-term effects of EBP competencies through proper training. Further, health educators should play supporting roles during EBP implementation and help school nurses establish relevant routines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.-L.H.; Methodology, P.-L.H.; Software, P.-L.H. Validation, P.-L.H.; Formal Analysis, P.-L.H. and S.-H.C.; Investigation, P.-L.H.; Data Curation, P.-L.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, P.-L.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.-H.C.; Supervision, S.-H.C.; Project Administration, P.-L.H. and S.-H.C.; Funding Acquisition, S.-H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 104-2511-S–255-003-MY2) and received financial assistance from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (BMRPE03).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the school nurses who participated in this study. Our great appreciation is expressed to the Association of Chinese School Health Nursing for their support and data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

EBP Evidence-based practice
SNEBP School Nurse Evidence-Based Practice

References

  1. Ciliska, D. Educating for evidenced-based practice. J. Prof. Nurs. 2005, 21, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fineout-Overholt, E.; Melnyk, B.M.; Schultz, A. Transforming Health Care from the Inside Out: Advancing Evidence-Based Practice in the 21st Century. J. Prof. Nurs. 2005, 21, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chiang, L.-C. A new vision of nursing: The evolution and development of evidence-based nursing. J. Nurs. 2014, 61, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cullen, L.; Titler, M.G. Promoting Evidence-Based Practice: An Internship for Staff Nurses. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2004, 1, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hsu, L.-L.; Hsieh, S.-I.; Huang, Y.-H. A Study of the Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Competence of Nurses and Its Clinical Applications. J. Nurs. 2015, 62, 30–40. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kao, C.W.; Yang, P.L.; Chiang, L.C. Evidence-based nursing education in academic program. Yuan Yuan Nurs. 2014, 8, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hsieh, P.-L.; Chen, S.-H.; Chang, L.-C. School Nurses’ Perceptions, Knowledge, and Related Factors Associated with Evidence-Based Practice in Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ministry of Education Taiwan. Health Promoting School. 2011 [cited 2013 1220]. Available online: http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96 (accessed on 28 May 2020).
  9. Adams, S.; Barron, S. Use of Evidence-Based Practice in School Nursing: Prevalence, Associated Variables, and Perceived Needs. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2009, 6, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. DeSisto, M.C.; O’Brien, M.J. Advocating for access to evidence for evidence-based practice in school health. NASN Sch. Nurse 2013, 28, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gulzar, S.A. Development of the School Health Education Program from the perspective of Comprehensive School Health Model: An example at a higher secondary school of Karachi, Pakistan. Taiwan J. Public Health 2017, 36, 545–555. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, H.Y. Translation of research into practice, focusing on health promotion in children and adolescents. Cheng Ching Med. J. 2017, 13, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cilisk, D.K. Resources to enhance evidence-based nursing practice. AACN Clin. Issues Crit. Care Nurs. 2001, 12, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bussières, A.; Al Zoubi, F.; Stuber, K.; French, S.D.; Boruff, J.T.; Corrigan, J.; Thomas, A. Evidence-based practice, research utilization, and knowledge translation in chiropractic: A scoping review. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Huang, C.-Y.; Huang, S.-T.; Lee, Y.-W.; Liao, Y.-C.; Chang, S.-C. An experience promoting evidence-based nursing at a medical center in central Taiwan. J. Nurs. 2006, 53, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yeh, C.C. Effectiveness of attending an evidence-based nursing workshop for nurses in a medical center. New Taipei J. Nurs. 2010, 12, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin, P.-F. Health promoting schools: A new era in school nursing. J. Nurs. 2005, 52, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuo, H.-M.; Lin, C.-H.; Lee, H.-H.; Chang, M.-J.; Fan, S.-H.; Chang, Y.-J. Building an evidence-based practice culture: Incorporating evidence-based nursing in the clinical ladder system. J. Nurs. 2011, 58, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, H.Z.; Lee, K.T.; Lin, S.Y. Self-assessment nursing competence among different levels of nurses in a clinical ladder program. J. Health Sci. 2009, 11, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang, P.H.; Chang, L.Y.; Lin, L.Y. An evaluation of evidence-based nursing training implemented on nurses: Critically appraised topics (CATs) as an example. VGH Nurs. 2010, 27, 240–250. [Google Scholar]
  21. Penz, K.L.; Bassendowski, S.L. Evidence-based nursing in clinical practice: Implications for nurse educators. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2006, 37, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ramos-Morcillo, A.J.; Fernández-Salazar, S.; Ruzafa-Martinez, M.; Casado, R.D.P. Effectiveness of a Brief, Basic Evidence-Based Practice Course for Clinical Nurses. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2015, 12, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, C.Y.; Wang, W.F.; Chang, Y.J. The effects of evidence-based nursing training program on nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and behavior. New Taipei J. Nurs. 2011, 13, 19–31. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, Y.W. An evaluation of database usage of nurses in a medical center. New Taipei J. Nurs. 2005, 7, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Munroe, D.; Duffy, P.; Fisher, C. Nurse knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to evidence-based practice: Before and after organizational supports. Medsurg Nurs. 2008, 17, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  26. Marwaha, S. Pediatric Nurses’ Perceptions of Evidenced-Based Practice; D’Youville College: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2001; p. 193. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin, L.Y. The Experience of Evidence-Based Nursing Implementation in a Medical Center. VGH Nurs. 2011, 82, 581–629. [Google Scholar]
  28. Olade, R.A. Evidence-based practice and research utilization activities among rural nurses. J. Nurs. Sch. 2004, 36, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thompson, C.; McCaughan, D.; Cullum, N.; Sheldon, T.; Mulhall, A.; Thompson, D.R. Research information in nurses’ clinical decision-making: What is useful? J. Adv. Nurs. 2001, 36, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Johnson, N.; List-Ivankovic, J.; Eboh, W.; Ireland, J.; Adams, D.; Mowatt, E.; Martindale, S. Research and evidence based practice: Using a blended approach to teaching and learning in undergraduate nurse education. Nurse Educ. Pr. 2010, 10, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hickman, L.D.; Digiacomo, M.; Phillips, J.L.; Rao, A.; Newton, P.J.; Jackson, D.; Ferguson, C. Improving evidence based practice in postgraduate nursing programs: A systematic review. Nurse Educ. Today 2018, 63, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mallidou, A.; Atherton, P.; Chan, L.; Frisch, N.; Glegg, S.M.N.; Scarrow, G. Core knowledge translation competencies: A scoping review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018, 18, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, Q.; Yan, W.; Zhang, F.; Hu, R.; Li, Y.; Yan, W.R.; Kitsiou, S.; Raupach, T.; Sowan, A. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2016, 18, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ilic, D.; Hart, W.; Fiddes, P.; Misso, M.L.; Villanueva, E. Adopting a blended learning approach to teaching evidence based medicine: A mixed methods study. BMC Med. Educ. 2013, 13, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. McCutcheon, K.; Lohan, M.; Traynor, M.; Martin, D. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. J. Adv. Nurs. 2014, 71, 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Posey, L.; Pintz, C. Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: Successes, challenges & outcomes. Nurse Educ. Pr. 2017, 26, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Betihavas, V.; Bridgman, H.; Kornhaber, R.; Cross, M. The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 2016, 38, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Herreid, C.; Schiller, N.; Herreid, K.; Wright, C. Case Study: A Chat with the Survey Monkey: Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 2014, 44, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Leung, J.Y.C.; Kumta, S.; Jin, Y.; Yung, A.L.K. Short review of the flipped classroom approach. Med. Educ. 2014, 48, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chu, T.-L.; Wang, J.; Monrouxe, L.V.; Sung, Y.-C.; Kuo, C.-L.; Ho, L.-H.; Lin, Y.-E. The effects of the flipped classroom in teaching evidence based nursing: A quasi-experimental study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olakanmi, E.E. The Effects of a Flipped Classroom Model of Instruction on Students’ Performance and Attitudes Towards Chemistry. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2016, 26, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, J.L.; Han, D.Y. A class without a teacher-the self-learning benefits and factors led to success of flipped classroom. J. Far. East Univ. Gen. Educ. 2015, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rowe, M.; Frantz, J.; Bozalek, V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: A systematic review. Med. Teach. 2012, 34, e216–e221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Brown, C.E.; Wickline, M.; Ecoff, L.; Glaser, D. Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical center. J. Adv. Nurs. 2009, 65, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, Y.J. Self-efficacy of evidence-based practice and its correlations with evidence-based practice beliefs and barriers among nurses: A preliminary study. VGH Nurs. 2013, 30, 144–152. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chang, H.C.; Russell, C.; Chuang, L.T. The barriers of research utilization in practice. J. Health Manag. 2005, 3, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
  47. Johnston, J.M.; Schooling, C.M.; Leung, G.M. A randomised-controlled trial of two educational modes for undergraduate evidence-based medicine learning in Asia. BMC Med. Educ. 2009, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. School Nurses Association ROC. School Nurse Association 2020 [cited 2020 0527]. Available online: http://www.schoolnurses.org.tw/index.php (accessed on 25 May 2020).
Table 1. Outline of the evidence-based practice (EBP) training program.
Table 1. Outline of the evidence-based practice (EBP) training program.
SectionsClassroom LearningOnline Learning Hours
The concept of EBP
Instruction of EBP
The five EBP steps
V 2
Ask: PICO question
PICO framework
Question statement
V 2
Development of a search strategy
Search strategy
Eligibility criteria
Screening and data extraction
V2
Databases for EBP research
Electronic literature search strategies
Practice
V 3
Supervision V1
Level of evidence
A variety of evidence types and levels
The characteristics of evidence
V2
Appraisal of evidence
Critical appraisal tools
Reporting guidelines for EBP
V2
Integration of evidence
Apply all five steps to a school health scenario
V2
Supervision V1
Oral presentation
Apply the evidence in school health practice and present the report
V 3
EBP: Evidence-based practice; PICO: patient, intervention, comparator and outcome; V: the way of learning.
Table 2. Participant demographics (N = 193).
Table 2. Participant demographics (N = 193).
VariablesN%
Highest degree
Master’s degree3819.7
Bachelor’s degree13972.0
Diploma168.3
Continuing education
No15580.3
Yes3819.7
Participation in research programs
No12162.7
Yes7237.3
Participation in EBP training courses
No12564.8
Yes6835.2
Frequency of reading journal articles in the previous year
Never105.2
Several months 13368.9
At least every month2613.5
Every two weeks 147.3
At least every week105.2
Motivation for attending EBP training (multiple choice)
Personal interests 9247.7
Job requirements6835.2
Nursing; continuing education requirements 3719.2
Others126.2
EBP: Evidence-based practice.
Table 3. The top five training courses from the previous year (multiple-choice) (N = 193).
Table 3. The top five training courses from the previous year (multiple-choice) (N = 193).
CoursesN%Ranking
Emergency care8242.5 1
Health promotion program7237.3 2
Infectious disease prevention and management6835.2 3
Health information management 5025.9 4
Crisis management3819.7 5
Table 4. Descriptive statistics for the learning effectiveness of the EBP training program over time (N = 193).
Table 4. Descriptive statistics for the learning effectiveness of the EBP training program over time (N = 193).
ItemMeanSDp
Knowledge of EBP
Baseline2.711.100.000 ***
Post-training3.460.86
Follow-up3.830.83
Attitudes about EBP
Baseline3.730.580.09
Post-training3.850.60
Follow-up3.860.61
Skills in EBP
Baseline3.260.770.000 ***
Post-training3.800.62
Follow-up3.700.50
Self-efficacy in implementing EBP
Baseline3.420.760.000 ***
Post-training3.720.79
Follow-up3.850.75
EBP: Evidence-based practice; SD: standard deviation; *** p < 0.001.
Table 5. Summary of the repeated-measures ANOVAs for each scale.
Table 5. Summary of the repeated-measures ANOVAs for each scale.
Source of Variation SSdfMSFMultivariate Eta Squared
Knowledge of EBP 171.33242.6065.36 ***0.96
Attitudes about EBP96.3420.644.100.98
Skills in EBP111.94210.4158.24 ***0.99
Self-efficacy in implementing EBP177.1426.4333.19 ***0.21
EBP: evidence-based practice; SS: sum of squares; MS: mean square; df: degrees of freedom; *** p < 0.001.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hsieh, P.-L.; Chen, S.-H. Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention among School Nurses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114063

AMA Style

Hsieh P-L, Chen S-H. Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention among School Nurses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(11):4063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hsieh, Pei-Lin, and Sue-Hsien Chen. 2020. "Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention among School Nurses" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 11: 4063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop