Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Lipid Extracts from the Marine Fungi Emericellopsis cladophorae and Zalerion maritima as a Source of Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Compounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Functional Analysis of Two Novel Genes—Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase Gene (AlGGPPS) and Isopentenyl Pyrophosphate Isomerase Gene (AlIDI)—from Aurantiochytrium limacinum Significantly Enhance De Novo β-Carotene Biosynthesis in Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Journal
Multiomic Approach for Bioprospection: Investigation of Toxins and Peptides of Brazilian Sea Anemone Bunodosoma caissarum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen Sources Affect the Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Content in Thraustochytrium sp. RT2316-16
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Saturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Production by Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4 on Enteromorpha Hydrolysate

1
Center of Marine Environmental Ecology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
School of Fishery, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
3
Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
4
Qingdao Institute for Ocean Technology of Tianjin University Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266237, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(4), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040198
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 21 March 2023 / Accepted: 21 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Thraustochytrids: Biology and Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Thraustochytrids are unicellular marine heterotrophic protists, which have recently shown a promising ability to produce omega-3 fatty acids from lignocellulosic hydrolysates and wastewaters. Here we studied the biorefinery potential of the dilute acid-pretreated marine macroalgae (Enteromorpha) in comparison with glucose via fermentation using a previously isolated thraustochytrid strain (Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4). The total reducing sugars in the Enteromorpha hydrolysate accounted for 43.93% of the dry cell weight (DCW). The strain was capable of producing the highest DCW (4.32 ± 0.09 g/L) and total fatty acids (TFA) content (0.65 ± 0.03 g/L) in the medium containing 100 g/L of hydrolysate. The maximum TFA yields of 0.164 ± 0.160 g/g DCW and 0.196 ± 0.010 g/g DCW were achieved at 80 g/L of hydrolysate and 40 g/L of glucose in the fermentation medium, respectively. Compositional analysis of TFA revealed the production of equivalent fractions (% TFA) of saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids in hydrolysate or glucose medium. Furthermore, the strain yielded a much higher fraction (2.61–3.22%) of eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n-3) in the hydrolysate medium than that (0.25–0.49%) in the glucose medium. Overall, our findings suggest that Enteromorpha hydrolysate can be a potential natural substrate in the fermentative production of high-value fatty acids by thraustochytrids.

1. Introduction

Marine microalgae have great biotechnological applications because of their capacity to synthesize a wide variety of valuable metabolites [1,2,3]. They are considered the most promising alternative sources of feed, biofuels, and chemicals [4,5]. Some strains of Stramenopile are well-known for their ability to produce high amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and saturated fatty acids (SFAs), which find applications in nutraceuticals and biofuels industries [6]. Particularly, thraustochytrids, which are unicellular heterotrophic marine protists of the Stramenopile group, often considered as non-photosynthetic microalgae [7], can utilize several carbon sources (e.g., glucose, glycerol, fructose, sucrose, and biomass hydrolysate) for their growth and fatty acid production [8,9]. However, the production of fatty acids by thraustochytrids is largely affected by the carbon source of the fermentation medium [9]. The type and concentration of the carbon source can greatly influence the growth and metabolism of thraustochytrids [9,10], and ultimately affect the quantity and quality of the fatty acids produced. For example, some studies have shown that thraustochytrids can produce higher levels of certain types of fatty acids when grown on specific carbon sources, such as glucose or glycerol, compared to other carbon sources [9,11]. In addition, the concentration of the carbon source can also play a role in determining the fatty acid production by thraustochytrids, with some studies indicating that higher concentrations of glycerol can result in higher lipid accumulation and higher levels of certain fatty acids [11]. Overall, the carbon source used in the fermentation medium can have a significant impact on the production of fatty acids by thraustochytrids, and the careful selection of the appropriate carbon source and concentration is crucial for optimizing the yield and quality of the fatty acids produced.
Although heterotrophic cultivation of thraustochytrids yields substantial productivity, it requires large nutrient input. Moreover, fermentation of commercial substrates can significantly increase the overall cost of the bioprocess for fatty acid production using thraustochytrids [12]. To this end, natural substrates should be carefully selected to make heterotrophic cultivation of thraustochytrids feasible [13]. So far, thraustochytrids have been reported to use certain natural substrates such as bagasse [14,15], Jerusalem artichoke [16], sweet sorghum straw juice [17], crude glycerol [18,19,20], mixed wastewater [21], cane molasses [22], hemp [23], and forest biomass [24,25] for the production of fatty acids. Compared to lignocellulosic hydrolysates, the macroalgal hydrolysate contains a relatively low amount of lignin and cellulose, and their pretreatment and saccharification are much simpler and easier [26]. However, the chemical composition of macroalgae biomass is heavily influenced by the species and the conditions under which it grows. Macroalgae usually have a dry matter content of 10 to 25% by weight [27], and the majority of this consists of carbohydrates, which can make up to 60% of the total weight [28]. While all macroalgae have cellulose, the specific types of carbohydrates present vary among the different groups. Brown algae, for instance, mainly contain laminarin, mannitol, alginate, glucan, and fucoidan, while red algae have carrageenan, agar, and lignin, and green algae possess mannan, ulvan, and starch [29]. To achieve environmental benefits and improve product quality while eliminating any residual waste, the most desirable approach for utilizing marine macroalgae waste appears to be the cascade biorefinery approach [30].
A previous research explored the use of macroalgae waste as a resource for food and chemicals [31]. A single-step microwave process was used to produce a growth medium for microbial fermentation from a variety of UK native seaweeds, with the brown seaweeds, particularly kelp, showing the highest potential. The oleaginous yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima was used to metabolize the medium and produce lipids, achieving a yield of 6.9 g/L yeast biomass containing 37.2% (w/w) lipid. This system provided a low-cost route to edible microbial oils and renewable feedstock for oleochemicals. However, despite the potential benefits of using marine algal biomass as a substrate for fatty acid production, there has been limited research on this topic. For instance, the potential of marine algal biomass as a substrate for fatty acid production using thraustochytrids has seldom been studied. Further studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility and viability of using marine algal biomass for fatty acid production and to optimize the process for maximum efficiency and yield.
Enteromorpha, a marine green macroalgal genus, has recently drawn the attention of researchers for biorefinery applications. Enteromorpha has important ecological and economic implications, as it serves as a food source and habitat for many marine organisms [32,33]. However, excess growth of Enteromorpha can also lead to negative environmental impacts, such as oxygen depletion and habitat degradation. They occur from the intertidal to the upper subtidal zones of the world’s ocean and are the most common fouling algae [34]. Due to climate change and coastal eutrophication, Enteromorpha blooms occur almost every year along the coast of Qingdao, China, leading to a series of environmental and economic losses [32,35]. Conventional methods of controlling fouling Enteromorpha involve the use of harmful substances such as oxidants, acids, heavy metal compounds, and synthetic fungicides, which can be applied directly to water or to Enteromorpha-infested surfaces or incorporated into marine coatings as antifouling agents [36]. Despite being cost-effective and convenient, these methods pose significant environmental challenges. The use of hydrogen peroxide and sulfuric acid solutions to eradicate algae propagules, for instance, can result in water contamination and adversely impact other marine organisms. Therefore, continued research is needed to develop effective strategies for utilizing their biomass and indirectly controlling its negative impacts on marine ecosystems.
The biomass of Enteromorpha has been typically discarded as an environmental waste [32]. Interestingly, their biomass is composed of many sulfated polysaccharides containing glucose, xylose, glucuronic acid, galactose, and rhamnose [34,37,38,39]. These polysaccharides show many bioactive functions such as anticoagulant activity, antioxidant activity, antitumor activity, and immunomodulatory activity [33,34,40,41]. Furthermore, the Enteromorpha hydrolysate has been reported in several studies as a potential substrate for production of biofuels and bioactive compounds [42,43,44,45]. Some studies also suggested the potential application of Enteromorpha in bioremediation of heavy metals [46,47]. However, no effort has been made to ferment Enteromorpha hydrolysates to produce high-value fatty acids using thraustochytrids.
In this study, the content and composition of total reducing sugars in the hydrolysate derived from the dilute acid hydrolysis of the dried Enteromorpha were analyzed for their potential as a substrate for biomass and fatty acid production using a previously isolated thraustochytrid strain (Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4). Our study provides the first report on the potential application of Enteromorpha hydrolysate as natural substrate to produce SFAs and PUFAs via microbial fermentation.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Sugar Content and Composition of Enteromorpha Hydrolysate

The total sugar content of Enteromorpha hydrolysate was 43.9% ± 1.9%, accounting for almost half the dried weight of Enteromorpha. The high sugar content of Enteromorpha hydrolysate could make it a suitable substrate for lipid fermentation by thraustochytrids. Further analysis of the total sugars indicated that glucose was the major sugar in the hydrolysate (Figure S1). A previous sugar compositional analysis of Enteromorpha compressa revealed that it consists of a high amount of rhamnose along with a smaller quantity of other monosaccharides such as glucose, xylose, and galactose [37]. Likewise, another study found glucose, xylose, rhamnose, and glucuronic acid as the main reducing sugars in Enteromorpha hydrolysate [38]. The extraction and hydrolysis methods in previous studies were important factors that determined the sugar composition of Enteromorpha. For instance, when 20 and 50 g/L of Enteromorpha polysaccharides were hydrolyzed with the crude enzymes of Vibrio sp. H11, the concentrations of reducing sugars were 0.8 g/L and 0.93 g/L, respectively [48]. These concentrations were 49.03% and 36.12% higher than that of the control. To assess the potential of Enteromorpha sp. as a bioenergy resource, another study examined the impact of reaction conditions such as solid-to-liquid ratio, reaction temperature, and reaction time on sugars produced through a combined process of hydrothermal and enzymatic hydrolysis [49]. The results showed that under specific conditions of solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:10, reaction temperature of 170 °C, and reaction time of 60 min, hydrothermal hydrolysis produced 7.3 g/L (8% yield) of total reducing sugar. Subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of samples treated at 170 °C for 30 min resulted in a yield of 20.1 g/L (22%). In yet another study, a method to use the biomass of invasive brown alga Rugulopteryx okamurae to produce monosaccharides was reported, which can then be used to create valuable bioproducts through fermentation [50]. The method involved using Aspergillus awamori in a solid-state fermentation process to pretreat the seaweed before enzymatic hydrolysis. The study found that a five-day pretreatment with A. awamori followed by 24 h of enzymatic saccharification was the most effective condition, resulting in the production of approximately 240 g of total reducing sugars per kg of dried biomass, with glucose being the primary sugar obtained.
Interestingly, our study demonstrated that the use of diluted sulfuric acid for biomass hydrolysis can be beneficial for improved substrate utilization by thraustochytrids during fermentation.

2.2. Lipid Production Potential of Enteromorpha Hydrolysate

To test the potential of the Enteromorpha hydrolysate as a fermentation substrate for lipid production by the PKU#Mn4 strain, the cell growth, substrate consumption, and intracellular lipid content were compared between cultivation on hydrolysate (60 g/L) and glucose (25 g/L) media. The estimated maximum growth rate of the strain was 6.20 gL−1d−1 and 4.18 gL−1d−1 on the hydrolysate and glucose media, respectively (Table 1). However, the strain reached the stationary phase relatively earlier (ca. 36 h) in the hydrolysate medium than in the glucose medium (48 h) (Figure 1a). These results indicated possible growth inhibition of the PKU#Mn4 strain on hydrolysate medium after rapid consumption of the fermentable sugars. Our findings are in agreement with previous studies that highlighted the potential growth inhibition by certain compounds, e.g., furfural [51] and polyphenols [52], which are often generated in the acid hydrolysis process of biomass [53,54]. Interestingly, despite growth inhibition, the DCW of the strain on the hydrolysate medium reached an estimated maximum value of 3.635 g/L, which was 66.47% of the DCW (5.469 g/L) on the glucose medium (Table 1).
The consumption pattern of total reducing sugars in the Enteromorpha hydrolysate was similar to that of the glucose medium (Figure 1b). However, the sugar consumption by the PKU#Mn4 strain started to relatively retard after 24 h of cultivation on the hydrolysate medium. At the end of fermentation, the residual reducing sugars content in the hydrolysate medium was 8.83 ± 0.37 g/L, which indicated that about 63.5% of the total reducing sugars was fermentable. At the same time, most of the glucose (96.7%) was consumed when the strain was cultivated on a glucose medium. Enteromorpha hydrolysates are reported to constitute reducing sugars other than glucose [38], and some of these sugars (xylose, rhamnose, and glucuronic acid) are generally not amenable to fermentation by thraustochytrids.
The time course of fatty acid accumulation by the PKU#Mn4 strain on the hydrolysate and glucose media exhibited a sigmoid pattern (Figure 1c). The modified Gompertz model fitted the experimental data satisfactorily (Table 1, Figure 1c). The estimated maximum accumulation rate (0.287 gL−1d−1) of fatty acids in the hydrolysate medium was considerably lower than that (0.882 gL−1d−1) in the glucose medium (Table 1), indicating a possible repression of the biosynthetic enzymes by inhibitory compounds in the Enteromorpha hydrolysate. Consequently, while the strain was able to produce an estimated maximum TFA concentration of 1.09 g/L on the glucose medium, it could produce 0.628 g/L on the hydrolysate medium. Nevertheless, our study revealed that Enteromorpha hydrolysate, which yielded up to 57.6% of the TFA content produced on glucose medium, could be a potential natural substrate for lipid production using thraustochytrids.
A previous study evaluated the potential of marine macroalgae as a sustainable source of renewable biomass for the production of single-cell oils (SCOs) through a biorefinery system [55]. The study specifically looked at the environmental and economic sustainability of producing SCOs from the seaweed Saccharina latissima using the oleaginous yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima. The study found that seaweed-derived SCO lipids can be comparable to a terrestrial oil mix and suggests that seaweed offers a viable proposition for the competitive production of exotic oils. The results of our study support this previous research and provides evidence for the potential use of macroalgal hydrolyzates for the production of valuable fatty acids.

2.3. Effect of Enteromorpha Hydrolysate Concentration on Growth and Fatty Acid Content

The effects of various concentrations of Enteromorpha hydrolysate and glucose on the DCW and TFA content of the PKU#Mn4 strain were measured and compared in this study. The results revealed a significant effect of hydrolysate and glucose concentrations on both the DCW and TFA content (Figure 2). Among the tested concentrations of hydrolysate, 100 g/L provided the maximum DCW (4.32 ± 0.09 g/L) (Figure 2a) and TFA content (0.65 ± 0.03 g/L) (Figure 2b), while 20 g/L and 20–40 g/L of glucose provided the maximum DCW (5.98 ± 0.30 g/L) (Figure 2d) and TFA content (~1.0 g/L) (Figure 2e), respectively. In terms of TFA yield, 80 g/L of hydrolysate and 40 g/L of glucose provided the maximum values of 164 ± 16 mg/g DCW (Figure 2c) and 196 ± 10 mg/g DCW (Figure 2f), respectively. The TFA yield on Enteromorpha hydrolysate was comparable with those obtained on other reported feedstocks (Table 2). The lower TFA yield obtained in our study could be attributed to the use of the PKU#Mn4 strain, which showed a low TFA yield even in the glucose medium. Enhancing the lipid production of Enteromorpha hydrolysates by using more potential thraustochytrid strains could be an interesting topic of future investigation [56].
Macroalgae are a promising source of biologically active compounds with health benefits, such as polysaccharides and peptides [30]. Brown seaweeds are the most studied, but their polyphenol content can prevent fermentation [57]. In the present study, we demonstrated the feasibility of fermenting the biomass of green alga Enteromorpha to produce fatty acids. More importantly, fermentation of macroalgae waste can improve the release of bioactive compounds, but the target compound and algae characteristics determine the fermentation type and conditions [29]. Applying pretreatment can promote a higher release of bioactive compounds, but excessive treatment can lead to degradation and loss of bioactive properties [57]. More research is needed to understand the use of algae fermentation for food and nutraceutical applications.
Our results showed that the DCW tends to decrease when the hydrolysate concentration is raised above 100 g/L. Other studies using thraustochytrids also reported low DCW yield when the substrate concentration in the fermentation medium exceeded a certain level [23,58,59]. As Enteromorpha biomass is mainly constituted by sulfated polysaccharides, its acid hydrolysis might release sugars that may have inhibitory effect at higher concentrations. Further investigation on the structure and function of the released sugars and compounds upon acid hydrolysis is needed to understand the mechanism of inhibition at high substrate concentration. Furthermore, our experimental data also indicated a decline in the DCW and TFA content when the glucose concentration in the fermentation medium exceeded 40 g/L, which likely suggested glucose repression of growth and activity. Indeed, the fungus Tuber borchii growth is affected by high glucose concentrations, possibly because of an increased osmotic pressure [60].
Further compositional analysis of the TFA revealed equivalent fractions of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the TFA contents produced by PKU#Mn4 on hydrolysate or glucose medium (Tables S2 and S3). The SFAs were mainly C14:0, C15:0, C16:0, C17:0, and C18:0, while the PUFAs were C20:5, C22:5, and C22:6. When the PKU#Mn4 strain was cultivated with various concentrations of hydrolysate, C16:0 alone accounted for about 31.06 to 34.25% of TFA (Figure 3, Table S2). However, when the strain was cultured in a glucose medium (Figure 3, Table S3), C16:0 accounted for 31.88 to 41.12% of TFA. On the other hand, the fractions of C15:0, C17:0, and C18:0 derived from hydrolysate fermentation were much higher than those from the glucose fermentation. The occurrence of odd-chain fatty acids (mainly C15:0) may be due to the branched-chain amino acids present in the macroalgal hydrolysate as reported previously [7]. Furthermore, the total SFA content ranged between 42.18 g/L and 49.64 g/L in hydrolysate medium (Table S2) and 37.15 g/L and 50.07 g/L in glucose medium (Table S3). The maximum total SFA content was achieved at 120 g/L of hydrolysate medium, while the same was achieved at 30 g/L of glucose medium.
Table 2. Comparative biomass and TFA production by various thraustochytrid strains.
Table 2. Comparative biomass and TFA production by various thraustochytrid strains.
StrainCarbon SourceBiomass (g/L)TFA
(g/L)
Maximum TFA Yield
(g/g Biomass)
Reference
Schizochytrium sp. HX-308Cane molasses25.545.210.20[22]
Schizochytrium sp. BCRC33482Sugarcane bagasse10.454.720.45[15]
Aurantiochytrium sp. YLH70Jerusalem artichoke32.7119.720.60[16]
Aurantiochytrium limacinum SR21Sweet sorghum juice (50%)9.386.860.73[17]
Aurantiochytrium sp. KRS101Empty palm fruit bunches34.4012.500.36[61]
Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4Enteromorpha hydrolysate4.320.650.16This study
Among the PUFAs, the content of C22:6 (DHA) derived from hydrolysate fermentation (35.59–39.13%) (Table S2) was slightly lower than that from glucose fermentation (37.60–43.26%) (Table S3). Interestingly, the PKU#Mn4 strain yielded a much higher fraction (2.61–3.22%) of C20:5 (EPA) in the hydrolysate medium than that (0.25–0.49%) in the glucose medium. Previous studies have mostly focused on DHA; therefore, reports on EPA production are rare. Moreover, the EPA fraction only accounted for a small percentage of TFA (usually less than 1%) for most of the reported thraustochytrid strains [62]. Since EPA is also an important PUFA with high nutraceutical value, our study provides an interesting finding that Enteromorpha hydrolysate could be a potential substrate for EPA production using thraustochytrids.
EPA is an omega-3 fatty acid that is generally found in fish oil and some algae [56,63]. It has been shown to have several health benefits, including reducing inflammation, improving heart health, and potentially reducing the risk of certain types of cancer [64,65]. EPA may also be beneficial for mental health, as it has been shown to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety [66]. Additionally, EPA may have benefits for eye health, cognitive function, and immune system function [67]. Interestingly, in the present study, we show for the first time that this high-value bioactive compound can be produced from macroalgal biomass via microbial fermentation using thraustochytrids. This suggests a new potential source of EPA production, which could have environmental benefits. However, more research is needed to understand the effectiveness and safety of EPA produced in this way for human consumption.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Enteromorpha Sampling

Enteromorpha prolifera samples were collected from the coastal waters of Qingdao, China, in August 2018, and washed three times with sterile distilled water before being transported to the lab for further treatment. The samples were spread evenly in a thin layer (0.1–0.5 cm) on a tray and air-dried in an oven for 5 days at 60 °C. The dried samples were stored in a glass desiccator for further processing.

3.2. Preparation of Enteromorpha Hydrolysate Medium

The dried Enteromorpha samples were ground into powder and sieved through a 200-mesh sieve (75 μm × 200). Enteromorpha powder and sulfuric acid (98%, w/v; Jiangtian Chemical, Tianjin, China) were mixed in a ratio of 5:1 and diluted with sterile distilled water to achieve a final sulfuric acid concentration of ca. 1.0% (w/v) (Table S1). The acid-pretreated solution was hydrolyzed at 121 °C for 60 min, and the resulting supernatant was adjusted to pH 7.0 with calcium hydroxide (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and a clear Enteromorpha hydrolysate was obtained by filtration. The hydrolysate was then concentrated on a Rotary Evaporator (SmarVapor RE-501, Dechem-Tech, Hamburg, Germany) and made to 1 L with sterile distilled water to achieve the desired hydrolysate concentration (40–120 g/L on a dry weight basis).

3.3. Batch Fermentation

A previously isolated strain of thraustochytrid [68], renamed Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4 (CGMCC 8091), was used in this study. The strain was maintained on modified Vishniac’s (MV) agar plates at 28 °C and subcultured every 4 weeks [62]. The seed culture was prepared following the procedure described in our previous study [11]. Batch fermentation experiments were performed in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 mL of MV medium (1.5 g/L peptone (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK), 1 g/L yeast extract (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK), 0.25 g/L KH2PO4 (Kermel, Tianjin, China), and 33 g/L artificial sea salt (Yier, Guangzhou, China)). The pH of the MV medium was adjusted to 7.0. The MV medium was autoclaved at 115 °C for 21 min. Five mL of the seed culture was inoculated into the sterile MV medium. Batch experiments were set up in triplicates for each concentration of Enteromorpha hydrolysate (40–120 g/L on a dry weight basis) or glucose (10–50 g/L, Damao, Tianjin, China). Enteromorpha hydrolysate or glucose was added to the MV medium before autoclavation. All batch cultures were incubated at 28 °C under reciprocal shaking (150 rpm) for 4 days. Samples were collected from the batch culture at regular intervals for further analysis.

3.4. Analytical Methods

The total reducing sugars was quantified using the dinitro salicylic acid (DNS, 9 Ding Chemistry, Tianjin, China) method [69]. For the DNS assay, 0.1 mL of the Enteromorpha hydrolysate was diluted with 1.9 mL double distilled water, and 0.5 mL of this diluted solution was added to 0.5 mL of DNS reagent, which was then incubated in a water bath at 100 °C for 5 min. After making the final volume of the incubated mixture to 10 mL, its absorbance was measured at 520 nm on a spectrophotometer (model #752, Jinghua, Shanghai, China). The content of the total reducing sugars was estimated based on a glucose standard curve. The yield of total sugar from Enteromorpha hydrolysate was calculated from the following equation.
T o t a l   r e d u c i n g   s u g a r s   ( % ) = r e d u c e d   s u g a r   s c o n t e n t × v o l u m e   o f   h y d r o l y s a t e × 0.9 d r y   w e i g h t   o f   E n t e r o m o r p h a × 100
To identify the sugar composition of the Enteromorpha hydrolysate, the reducing sugars in the hydrolysate were derivatized with p-aminobenzoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and then separated on an HPLC (model #1260, Agilent, Santa Clara, Germany) equipped with a C18 076187 (250 × 4.6) column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China). Briefly, a 100 μL of Enteromorpha hydrolysate was transferred into an Eppendorf tube containing 100 μL of p-aminobenzoic acid solution (0.7 g p-aminobenzoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), 1 g acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), and 0.1 g sodium cyanoborohydride (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) in 10 mL methanol (Macklin, Shanghai, China)). The tube was incubated in a water bath at 70 °C for 1 h. After incubation, the tube was cooled down to room temperature and the final volume of the reaction mixture was made to 1 mL with sterile distilled water. The sugar composition of the resulting solution was determined using HPLC. Isocratic elution with 5% methanol (Macklin, Shanghai, China) and 95% H2O for 30 min was employed. The UV wavelength, column temperature, and injection volume were 303 nm, 30 °C, and 20 μL, respectively. A similar procedure was followed for the standard solution of monosaccharides.
The dry cell weight (DCW) was quantified based on the gravimetric method described in our previous study [62]. The analysis of fatty acid composition was performed using the direct transesterification method [70] following the procedures detailed in our previous study [62].

3.5. Statistical Analyses

The mean, SD, and test of significance (ANOVA) for each parameter were computed in R software (version 4.0.0) [71]. A modified Gompertz model [72] was fitted to the experimental data to estimate the parameters: “a” (maximum growth potential, g/L), “R” (maximum growth rate, gL−1d−1), and “λ” (lag time, d) in R software (version 4.0.0). The data were plotted using Microsoft Excel and R package ggplot2 (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org).

4. Conclusions

Use of natural substrates is an important research topic that is likely to continue to gain attention and interest in the future. In recent years, there have been several outbreaks of Enteromorpha prolifera in various coastal regions around the world, including in China, South Korea, and the United States. Our research indicates that mechanical equipment, such as dredges or harvesters, can effectively remove large quantities of algae in a short amount of time. This method is also cost-effective, as the cost of collecting Enteromorpha prolifera is negligible. Additionally, the removal of the algae biomass may receive incentives from the local government, as it contributes to the cleaning of coastal areas. This study reports the first successful fermentative production of PUFAs and SFAs from the hydrolysate of the marine macroalgae Enteromorpha prolifera collected from the coastal waters of Qingdao. The Enteromorpha hydrolysate contained a considerable amount of fermentable reducing sugars. Despite the lower growth rate and substrate consumption in the hydrolysate medium, the PKU#Mn4 strain was able to produce the maximum DCW and TFA content with an optimal hydrolysate concentration of 100 g/L. Interestingly, the C20:5n-3 fraction of the TFA content produced with hydrolysate medium was considerably higher than that with glucose medium. Taken together, this study provides a method to produce high-value fatty acids from a marine macroalgal hydrolysate using a thraustochytrid strain. The proposed method has the potential to benefit both the environment and industry.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md21040198/s1, Figure S1: HPLC analysis of monosaccharide standard solution. (a) Rhamnose, (b) Glucose, (c) Mannose, (d) Galactose, (e) Glucuronic acid, and (f) Enteromorpha hydrolysate; Table S1: Composition of Enteromorpha hydrolysate medium; Table S2: Fatty acid composition of lipids accumulated during the cultivation of PKU#Mn4 on different concentrations of Enteromorpha hydrolysate; Table S3: Fatty acid composition of lipids accumulated during the cultivation of the PKU#Mn4 strain in different concentrations of glucose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H., B.S. and G.W.; methodology, Y.N., X.Z. and X.C.; validation, Y.H., Y.N. and G.W.; formal analysis, Y.H., B.S. and Y.N.; investigation, Y.H., Y.N., X.Z. and B.S.; resources, X.Z., X.C.; data curation, B.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.S., Y.H. and X.Z.; writing—review and editing, X.Z., B.S. and G.W.; visualization, B.S.; supervision, Y.H. and G.W.; project administration, Y.H. and G.W.; funding acquisition, G.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32170063), Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Marine Biology and Biotechnology Laboratory) 2018 Open Foundation Program (grant no. OF2018NO04), and Independent Fund Project of Tianjin University (2022XJS-0086).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gupta, A.; Barrow, C.J.; Puri, M. Multiproduct biorefinery from marine thraustochytrids towards a circular bioeconomy. Trends Biotechnol. 2021, 40, 448–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guedes, A.C.; Amaro, H.M.; Malcata, F.X. Microalgae as sources of high added-value compounds-a brief review of recent work. Biotechnol. Prog. 2011, 27, 597–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, L.; Pohnert, G.; Wei, D. Extracellular Metabolites from Industrial Microalgae and Their Biotechnological Potential. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pulz, O.; Gross, W. Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Adarme-Vega, T.C.; Lim, D.K.Y.; Timmins, M.; Vernen, F.; Li, Y.; Schenk, P.M. Microalgal biofactories: A promising approach towards sustainable omega-3 fatty acid production. Microb. Cell Factories 2012, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Siddiki, S.Y.A.; Mofijur, M.; Kumar, P.S.; Ahmed, S.F.; Inayat, A.; Kusumo, F.; Badruddin, I.A.; Khan, T.M.Y.; Nghiem, L.D.; Ong, H.C.; et al. Microalgae biomass as a sustainable source for biofuel, biochemical and biobased value-added products: An integrated biorefinery concept. Fuel 2022, 307, 121782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morabito, C.; Bournaud, C.; Maës, C.; Schuler, M.; Cigliano, R.A.; Dellero, Y.; Maréchal, E.; Amato, A.; Rébeillé, F. The lipid metabolism in thraustochytrids. Prog. Lipid Res. 2019, 76, 101007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patel, A.; Karageorgou, D.; Katapodis, P.; Sharma, A.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. Bioprospecting of thraustochytrids for omega-3 fatty acids: A sustainable approach to reduce dependency on animal sources. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Q.; Sen, B.; Liu, X.; He, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, G. Enhanced saturated fatty acids accumulation in cultures of newly-isolated strains of Schizochytrium sp. and Thraustochytriidae sp. for large-scale biodiesel production. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631, 994–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Q.; Ye, H.; Sen, B.; Xie, Y.; He, Y.; Park, S.; Wang, G. Improved production of docosahexaenoic acid in batch fermentation by newly-isolated strains of Schizochytrium sp. and Thraustochytriidae sp. through bioprocess optimization. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2018, 3, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, X.; Sen, B.; Zhang, S.; Bai, M.; He, Y.; Wang, G. Chemical and physical culture conditions significantly influence the cell mass and docosahexaenoic acid content of Aurantiochytrium limacinum strain PKU#SW8. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Russo, G.L.; Langellotti, A.L.; Sacchi, R.; Masi, P. Techno-economic assessment of DHA-rich Aurantiochytrium sp. production using food industry by-products and waste streams as alternative growth media. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 18, 100997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, X.M.; Xu, Y.S.; Huang, H. Thraustochytrid Cell Factories for Producing Lipid Compounds. Trends Biotechnol. 2021, 39, 648–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Qi, F.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, X.; Lin, J.; Cao, X.; Huang, J. A lignocellulosic hydrolysate-tolerant Aurantiochytrium sp. mutant strain for docosahexaenoic acid production. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 227, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nguyen, H.C.; Su, C.-H.; Yu, Y.-K.; Huong, D.T.M. Sugarcane bagasse as a novel carbon source for heterotrophic cultivation of oleaginous microalga Schizochytrium sp. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 121, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, X.-J.; Liu, J.-H.; Sun, J.; Zheng, J.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Wang, Z. Docosahexaenoic acid production from the acidic hydrolysate of Jerusalem artichoke by an efficient sugar-utilizing Aurantiochytrium sp. YLH70. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 83, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liang, Y.; Sarkany, N.; Cui, Y.; Yesuf, J.; Trushenski, J.; Blackburn, J.W. Use of sweet sorghum juice for lipid production by Schizochytrium limacinum SR21. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3623–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lung, Y.-T.; Tan, C.H.; Show, P.L.; Ling, T.C.; Lan, J.C.-W.; Lam, H.L.; Chang, J.-S. Docosahexaenoic acid production from crude glycerol by Schizochytrium limacinum SR21. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2016, 18, 2209–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee Chang, K.J.; Paul, H.; Nichols, P.D.; Koutoulis, A.; Blackburn, S.I. Australian thraustochytrids: Potential production of dietary long-chain omega-3 oils using crude glycerol. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 19, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abad, S.; Turon, X. Biotechnological Production of Docosahexaenoic Acid Using Aurantiochytrium limacinum: Carbon Sources Comparison And Growth Characterization. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 7275–7284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, S.-K.; Tian, Y.-T.; Dai, Y.-R.; Wang, D.; Liu, K.-C.; Cui, Y.-H. Development of an alternative medium via completely replaces the medium components by mixed wastewater and crude glycerol for efficient production of docosahexaenoic acid by Schizochytrium sp. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yin, F.W.; Zhu, S.Y.; Guo, D.S.; Ren, L.J.; Ji, X.J.; Huang, H.; Gao, Z. Development of a strategy for the production of docosahexaenoic acid by Schizochytrium sp. from cane molasses and algae-residue. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 271, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gupta, A.; Abraham, R.E.; Barrow, C.J.; Puri, M. Omega-3 fatty acid production from enzyme saccharified hemp hydrolysate using a novel marine thraustochytrid strain. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 184, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patel, A.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. Simultaneous production of DHA and squalene from Aurantiochytrium sp. grown on forest biomass hydrolysates. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patel, A.; Liefeldt, S.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. Co-production of DHA and squalene by thraustochytrid from forest biomass. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Thompson, T.M.; Young, B.R.; Baroutian, S. Advances in the pretreatment of brown macroalgae for biogas production. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 195, 106151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Syrpas, M.; Venskutonis, P.R. Chapter 6—Algae for the Production of Bio-Based Products. In Biobased Products and Industries; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 203–243. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, H.; Zhou, D.; Luo, G.; Zhang, S.; Chen, J. Macroalgae for biofuels production: Progress and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 47, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dussan, K.; Dijkstra, J.W.; Luzzi, S.; van Zandvoort, I.; van Hal, J.W. Seaweed versatility for biorefinery: Blessing or burden? Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2023, 39, 100728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pardilhó, S.; Cotas, J.; Pacheco, D.; Gonçalves, A.M.M.; Bahcevandziev, K.; Pereira, L.; Figueirinha, A.; Dias, J.M. Valorisation of marine macroalgae waste using a cascade biorefinery approach: Exploratory study. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 385, 135672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abeln, F.; Fan, J.; Budarin, V.L.; Briers, H.; Parsons, S.; Allen, M.J.; Henk, D.A.; Clark, J.; Chuck, C.J. Lipid production through the single-step microwave hydrolysis of macroalgae using the oleaginous yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima. Algal Res. 2019, 38, 101411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sun, S.; Wang, F.; Li, C.; Qin, S.; Zhou, M.; Ding, L.; Pang, S.; Duan, D.; Wang, G.; Yin, B.; et al. Emerging challenges: Massive green algae blooms in the Yellow Sea. Nat. Preced. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ning, L.; Yao, Z.; Zhu, B. Ulva (Enteromorpha) Polysaccharides and Oligosaccharides: A Potential Functional Food Source from Green-Tide-Forming Macroalgae. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhong, R.; Wan, X.; Wang, D.; Zhao, C.; Liu, D.; Gao, L.; Wang, M.; Wu, C.; Nabavid, S.M.; Daglia, M.; et al. Polysaccharides from Marine Enteromorpha: Structure and function. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Su, H.-Y.; Li, J.-M. Attribute non-attendance in choice experiments: A study of residents’ willingness-to-pay for the disposal of Enteromorpha prolifera in Qingdao, China. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2020, 191, 105184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ren, C.G.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhong, Z.H.; Wang, X.L.; Qin, S. Integrated biotechnology to mitigate green tides. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 309, 119764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chattopadhyay, K.; Mandal, P.; Lerouge, P.; Driouich, A.; Ghosal, P.; Ray, B. Sulphated polysaccharides from Indian samples of Enteromorpha compressa (Ulvales, Chlorophyta): Isolation and structural features. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Feng, D.; Liu, H.; Li, F.; Jiang, P.; Qin, S. Optimization of dilute acid hydrolysis of Enteromorpha. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2011, 29, 1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ray, B. Polysaccharides from Enteromorpha compressa: Isolation, purification and structural features. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhao, M.; Yu, S.; Qi, H. The immunological and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides extracted from Enteromorpha linza. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 57, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, C.; Huang, S.; Lin, Z.; Chen, H.; Xu, C.; Lin, Y.; Sun, H.; Huang, F.; Lin, D.; Guo, F. Polysaccharides from Enteromorpha prolifera alleviate hypercholesterolemia via modulating the gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 12194–12207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nagula, K.; Sati, H.; Trivedi, N.; Reddy, C.R.K. Chapter 17—Biofuels and Bioproducts from Seaweeds. In Advanced Biofuel Technologies; Tuli, D., Kasture, S., Kuila, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 431–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Suganya, T.; Nagendra Gandhi, N.; Renganathan, S. Production of algal biodiesel from marine macroalgae Enteromorpha compressa by two step process: Optimization and kinetic study. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thanigaivel, S.; Priya, A.K.; Dutta, K.; Rajendran, S.; Vasseghian, Y. Engineering strategies and opportunities of next generation biofuel from microalgae: A perspective review on the potential bioenergy feedstock. Fuel 2022, 312, 122827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, Y.; Xu, X.; Jiang, X.; Lin, J.; Lin, X.; Zhao, S.; Yang, J. Valorisation of harmful algae bloom (Enteromorpha prolifera) for polysaccharide and crude bio-oil production. Fuel 2022, 324, 124482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wen, Y.; Xue, C.; Ji, D.; Hou, Y.; Li, K.; Li, Y. Eco-friendly Enteromorpha polysaccharides-based hydrogels for heavy metal adsorption: From waste to efficient materials. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 656, 130531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Z.; Song, S.; Wang, H.; Yang, W.; Han, J.; Chen, H. Feasibility of Remediation of Heavy-Metal-Contaminated Marine Dredged Sediments by Active Capping with Enteromorpha Biochar. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, J.; Xu, Y.; Peng, T.; Zhong, M.; Hu, Z. Enhanced Fermentable Sugar Production from Enteromorpha Polysaccharides by the Crude Enzymes of Vibrio sp. H11. Microb. Physiol. 2019, 29, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, D.-H.; Lee, S.-B.; Jeong, G.-T. Production of reducing sugar from Enteromorpha intestinalis by hydrothermal and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 161, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Agabo-García, C.; Romero-García, L.I.; Álvarez-Gallego, C.J.; Blandino, A. Valorisation of the invasive alga Rugulopteryx okamurae through the production of monomeric sugars. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 1971–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Taherzadeh, M.J.; Gustafsson, L.; Niklasson, C.; Lidén, G. Inhibition effects of furfural on aerobic batch cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growing on ethanol and/or acetic acid. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 90, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yan, B.; Chen, Z.S.; Hu, Y.; Yong, Q. Insight in the Recent Application of Polyphenols From Biomass. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 753898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sen, B. Determination of Factors Affecting the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Low Severity Acid-steam Pretreated Agro-residue. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2014, 61, 809–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Almeida, J.R.; Bertilsson, M.; Gorwa-Grauslund, M.F.; Gorsich, S.; Lidén, G. Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 625–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Parsons, S.; Allen, M.J.; Abeln, F.; McManus, M.; Chuck, C.J. Sustainability and life cycle assessment (LCA) of macroalgae-derived single cell oils. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 1272–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chi, G.; Xu, Y.; Cao, X.; Li, Z.; Cao, M.; Chisti, Y.; He, N. Production of polyunsaturated fatty acids by Schizochytrium (Aurantiochytrium) spp. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 55, 107897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pérez-Alva, A.; MacIntosh, A.J.; Baigts-Allende, D.K.; García-Torres, R.; Ramírez-Rodrigues, M.M. Fermentation of algae to enhance their bioactive activity: A review. Algal Res. 2022, 64, 102684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chi, Z.; Pyle, D.; Wen, Z.; Frear, C.; Chen, S. A laboratory study of producing docosahexaenoic acid from biodiesel-waste glycerol by microalgal fermentation. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, T.Y.; Lu, W.C.; Chu, I.M. A fermentation strategy for producing docosahexaenoic acid in Aurantiochytrium limacinum SR21 and increasing C22:6 proportions in total fatty acid. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 123, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Saltarelli, R.; Ceccaroli, P.; Polidori, E.; Citterio, B.; Vallorani, L.; Stocchi, V. A high concentration of glucose inhibits Tuber borchii mycelium growth: A biochemical investigation. Mycol. Res. 2003, 107, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hong, W.K.; Yu, A.; Heo, S.Y.; Oh, B.R.; Kim, C.H.; Sohn, J.H.; Yang, J.W.; Kondo, A.; Seo, J.W. Production of lipids containing high levels of docosahexaenoic acid from empty palm fruit bunches by Aurantiochytrium sp. KRS101. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 959–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, Q.; Ye, H.; Xie, Y.; He, Y.; Sen, B.; Wang, G. Culturable Diversity and Lipid Production Profile of Labyrinthulomycete Protists Isolated from Coastal Mangrove Habitats of China. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Byreddy, A.R. Thraustochytrids as an alternative source of omega-3 fatty acids, carotenoids and enzymes. Lipid Technol. 2016, 28, 68–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Saini, R.K.; Prasad, P.; Sreedhar, R.V.; Akhilender Naidu, K.; Shang, X.; Keum, Y.S. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs): Emerging Plant and Microbial Sources, Oxidative Stability, Bioavailability, and Health Benefits—A Review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shakeri, S.; Amoozyan, N.; Fekrat, F.; Maleki, M. Antigastric Cancer Bioactive Aurantiochytrium Oil Rich in Docosahexaenoic Acid: From Media Optimization to Cancer Cells Cytotoxicity Assessment. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 2706–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sikka, P.; Behl, T.; Sharma, S.; Sehgal, A.; Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Singh, S.; Sharma, N.; Aleya, L. Exploring the therapeutic potential of omega-3 fatty acids in depression. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 43021–43034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Saini, R.K.; Ravishankar, G.A.; Keum, Y.S. Microalgae and Thraustochytrids are Sustainable Sources of Vegan EPA and DHA with Commercial Feasibility. Indian J. Microbiol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Y.; Singh, P.; Sun, Y.; Luan, S.; Wang, G. Culturable diversity and biochemical features of thraustochytrids from coastal waters of Southern China. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 3241–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Miller, G.L. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lepage, G.; Roy, C.C. Improved recovery of fatty acid through direct transesterification without prior extraction or purification. J. Lipid Res. 1984, 25, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Team, R.C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In R Foundation for Statistical Computing; R Foundation: Vienna, Austria, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  72. Tjørve, K.M.C.; Tjørve, E. The use of Gompertz models in growth analyses, and new Gompertz-model approach: An addition to the Unified-Richards family. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Time course of (a) DCW and (b) total reducing sugars, and (c) experimental and estimated (modified Gompertz model) total fatty acids (TFA) during the cultivation of the PKU#Mn4 strain on Enteromorpha hydrolysate and glucose media. EH stands for Enteromorpha hydrolysate.
Figure 1. Time course of (a) DCW and (b) total reducing sugars, and (c) experimental and estimated (modified Gompertz model) total fatty acids (TFA) during the cultivation of the PKU#Mn4 strain on Enteromorpha hydrolysate and glucose media. EH stands for Enteromorpha hydrolysate.
Marinedrugs 21 00198 g001
Figure 2. Effects of various concentrations of (ac) Enteromorpha hydrolysate and (df) glucose on the DCW, TFA content, and TFA yield of PKU#Mn4 strain. The significant codes indicate the results of multiple comparisons, where the mean of each group was compared to all (i.e., base mean) by a paired t-test. The significant codes *, **, ***, and **** represented significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate samples (n = 3).
Figure 2. Effects of various concentrations of (ac) Enteromorpha hydrolysate and (df) glucose on the DCW, TFA content, and TFA yield of PKU#Mn4 strain. The significant codes indicate the results of multiple comparisons, where the mean of each group was compared to all (i.e., base mean) by a paired t-test. The significant codes *, **, ***, and **** represented significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate samples (n = 3).
Marinedrugs 21 00198 g002
Figure 3. Effects of various concentrations of Enteromorpha hydrolysate (EH) and glucose (Glu) on the relative concentrations of fatty acids produced by PKU#Mn4 culture. The number after EH and Glu represents the concentration of EH and Glu.
Figure 3. Effects of various concentrations of Enteromorpha hydrolysate (EH) and glucose (Glu) on the relative concentrations of fatty acids produced by PKU#Mn4 culture. The number after EH and Glu represents the concentration of EH and Glu.
Marinedrugs 21 00198 g003
Table 1. Estimates of modified Gompertz model parameters after fitting experimental data.
Table 1. Estimates of modified Gompertz model parameters after fitting experimental data.
Dependent Variable a
(g/L)
R
(gL−1d−1)
λ
(d)
Residual
Standard Error
DCWEH medium3.635 ***6.201 *0.307 **0.251
Glucose medium5.469 ***4.183 ***0.0260.172
TFAEH medium0.628 ***0.287 ***−0.3690.034
Glucose medium1.092 ***0.882 ***0.0280.039
DCW: dry cell weight; TFA: total fatty acids; EH: Enteromorpha hydrolysate; a: maximum growth potential (g/L); R: maximum growth rate (gL−1d−1); λ: lag time (d); and significance codes: *** 0.001, ** 0.01, * 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Y.; Zhu, X.; Ning, Y.; Chen, X.; Sen, B.; Wang, G. Saturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Production by Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4 on Enteromorpha Hydrolysate. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040198

AMA Style

He Y, Zhu X, Ning Y, Chen X, Sen B, Wang G. Saturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Production by Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4 on Enteromorpha Hydrolysate. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(4):198. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040198

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Yaodong, Xingyu Zhu, Yaodong Ning, Xiaohong Chen, Biswarup Sen, and Guangyi Wang. 2023. "Saturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Production by Aurantiochytrium limacinum PKU#Mn4 on Enteromorpha Hydrolysate" Marine Drugs 21, no. 4: 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040198

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop