Next Article in Journal
Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for All Stages of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Definitive versus Consolidative
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
Healing of Unilateral Maxillary Sinusitis by Endodontic and Periodontal Treatment of Maxillary Teeth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Effect of Methanolic Extract of Paeonia lactiflora
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 58
Issue 9
10.3390/medicina58091303
Review Report
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of the Text Neck Posture on the Static Dental Occlusion

Medicina 2022, 58(9), 1303; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091303
by Eniko Tunde Stoica 1,2,†, Corina Marcauteanu 1,2,*,†, Anca Tudor 2,3,†, Virgil-Florin Duma 4,5,*,†, Elena Constanta Amaricai 3,6, Roxana Onofrei 6, Oana Suciu 6, Meda Lavinia Negrutiu 2 and Cosmin Sinescu 2,3,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Jean-Marc Retrouvey
Medicina 2022, 58(9), 1303; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091303
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 11 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 18 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection New Concepts for Dental Treatments and Evaluations)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

 

The article is very well written and the study has scientific relevance. I congratulate the team for the high-quality work. I have one doubt: - Was a sample calculation performed or was the sample chosen for convenience? I suggest adding this information to the text.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper addresses a potential issue with the extended use of personal phones .  The  method to assess he potential effect are to use a bite scan and compare several positions.

The research methods need to be improved as there is no calibration, no blind testing  and correlations between the results reported could be clarified. 

There is also no mention of the mandibular position when people are using their phone. It is possible that the teeth stay out of occlusion during phone use . This should have been tested prior to the study. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The theme of the research is very interesting and importante, since nowadays the head position while looking at the cell phone is deviated for a longer time during the day.

 

Introduction is well written.

 

Methods- I sholud aks about parafunction of the subjects evaluated. If they had any, that could be influencing the resulto f the study.

Also, was the cervical position evaluated? Although there was no pain or limited range of motion in the cervical spine, a patient with altered cervical position could be influencing the end result.

Was there any exclusion criteria? A patient with fibromialgia or autoimune disease, trauma or habit that could impact the cervical position.

Discussion did show the limitations of the study and discussed other studies in the same matter.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The results are not clearly stated. There are a lot of numbers but it would be nice to better explain their correlations and avoid using data that do not really add to the study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop