Next Article in Journal
Successful Dabrafenib Desensitization Protocols in a Patient with Metastatic Melanoma
Previous Article in Journal
Soft Tissue Defect Reconstruction and Lymphatic Complications Prevention: The Lymphatic Flow-Through (LyFT) Concept
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Bowel Rest with Total Parenteral Nutrition as an Alternative to Diverting Ileostomy in High-Risk Colorectal Anastomosis: A Pilot Study

1
Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
3
Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(4), 510; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040510
Submission received: 13 February 2022 / Revised: 8 March 2022 / Accepted: 31 March 2022 / Published: 2 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)

Abstract

:
Anastomotic leakage remains the most feared complication in colorectal surgery. Various intraoperative tests evaluate bowel perfusion and mechanical integrity of the colorectal anastomosis. These tests reduce the risk of postoperative anastomotic leakage; however, the incidence remains high. Diverting loop ileostomy mitigates the damage if anastomotic leakage occurs. Nevertheless, ileostomy has a significant rate of complications, reducing patients’ quality of life, and requiring an additional operation. We evaluated six consecutive cases where bowel rest with total parenteral nutrition was used instead of diverting loop ileostomy. All colorectal anastomoses were at high risk of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Total parenteral nutrition was administered for the first seven days postoperatively. There were no serious complications during the recovery period, and no clinical postoperative anastomotic leakage was detected. All patients tolerated total parenteral nutrition. Bowel rest with total parenteral nutrition may be a feasible option in high-risk left-sided colorectal anastomosis and a possible alternative to a preventive loop ileostomy. Further studies are necessary to evaluate it on a larger scale.

1. Introduction

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most feared complications in colorectal surgery. Despite immense research effort and practice changes, the percentage of AL remains high [1]. A diverting loop ileostomy is often used for damage control if AL occurs. However, ileostomies may cause complications, they significantly reduce patients’ quality of life and require an additional operation to close [2,3]. Moreover, up to 20 percent of preventive ileostomies are never closed [4]. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was previously adopted for patients with confirmed AL after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery [5]. However, it was never widely adopted in colorectal surgery and was only described as a one-off case in the literature [6]. Therefore, we hypothesised that short-term bowel rest with TPN could replace diverting loop ileostomy in high-risk left-sided colorectal anastomoses.

2. Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing elective left-sided colorectal resection with high-risk primary anastomosis (anastomosis ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge and/or presence of severe, life-threatening comorbidity) who agreed to participate were included. The central venous line was placed during anaesthesia, and patients underwent bowel rest with TPN for the first seven postoperative days.
TPN consisted of 1477 mL SmofKabiven, 10 mL of Addaven, 10 mL of Soluvit N, and 10 mL of Vitalipid N. The infusion starting speed was 30 mL/hour on the first postoperative day, 45 mL/hour on the second, and 62 mL/hour on the third until the seventh postoperative day.
Complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and electrolyte concentrations were monitored daily. After TPN, on the eighth postoperative day, patients were allowed to drink and eat liquid food.
The primary outcome of the study was the AL rate. Secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity rate and tolerance of TPN. Postoperative complications were graded by the Clavien–Dindo classification.

3. Results

Six patients were included in the study. Patient details are described in Table 1. There was no clinical postoperative AL detected. Two patients had elevated CRP during the parenteral nutrition period. Chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography scans with enteric contrast were performed, and AL was ruled out. These two patients developed grade II Clavien–Dindo complications: One patient developed postoperative fever, with negative blood and urine cultures, and the other developed wound seroma requiring drainage. Intravenous antibiotics were prescribed and inflammatory markers normalised. All other four patients had an uneventful postoperative course. All six patients did not have any complications associated with TPN.

4. Discussion

We present an alternative to diverting loop ileostomy by using bowel rest and TPN in high-risk left-sided colorectal anastomoses. There was no AL detected, and all patients tolerated bowel rest with TPN.
Colorectal surgeons aim to create safe anastomosis by ensuring adequate bowel perfusion and mechanical integrity of the anastomosis. Several studies showed the benefit of bowel perfusion (indocyanine green) and mechanical integrity (air-leak and methylene blue) testing in reducing postoperative AL [1,7,8]. Unfortunately, the risk of postoperative AL remains quite high even though anastomosis mechanical integrity and bowel perfusion are ensured. Thus, preventive ileostomy remains relevant to reducing the risk and consequences of AL [9,10]. Bowel rest and TPN achieve the same goal—dysfunction colorectal anastomosis—but it avoids repeated operation, necessary for an ileostomy.
One of the recommendations for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is early postoperative oral nutrition [11]. Therefore, bowel rest with TPN is contradictory to current ERAS guidelines. However, an ileostomy is a significant burden for the patient, reducing the quality of life, and is one of the most undesirable effects of colorectal surgery Furthermore, in most cases, a diverting ileostomy needs additional hospitalisation to revert it. This type of surgery has its own complications, some of them even being life-threatening [12]. Some surgeons are even arguing against the routine use of diverting ileostomy due to the high long-term morbidity associated with it [13]. Taking all this into account, patients eagerly agreed to participate in the study when avoiding ileostomy was an option.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, bowel rest with total parenteral nutrition may be a feasible option in high-risk left-sided colorectal anastomosis and a possible alternative to a preventive loop ileostomy. Further studies are necessary to evaluate it on a larger scale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, T.P. and M.K.; methodology T.P., M.K. and V.R.; software M.J. and N.G.; validation T.P., M.J., M.K., N.G. and V.R.; formal analysis T.P., M.J., N.G. and M.K.; investigation T.P., M.K. and V.R.; resources T.P., M.K. and V.R.; data curation M.J. and N.G.; writing—original draft preparation M.K., M.J. and N.G.; writing—review and editing T.P., M.J., M.K., N.G. and V.R.; supervision T.P., M.K. and V.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Vilnius Regional Bioethics Committee, Vilnius, Lithuania (No. 2019/3-116-608).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article. Deidentified data that underlie the results reported in this article will be shared with third parties after a written request to the corresponding author describing the intention of data usage and full affiliation of the requesting organisation. To gain access to the data, a data access agreement needs to be signed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kryzauskas, M.; Bausys, A.; Jakubauskas, M.; Valciukiene, J.; Makunaite, G.; Jasiunas, E.; Bausys, R.; Poskus, E.; Strupas, K.; Poskus, T. Intraoperative testing of colorectal anastomosis and the incidence of anastomotic leak: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2020, 99, e23135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bausys, A.; Kuliavas, J.; Dulskas, A.; Kryzauskas, M.; Pauza, K.; Kilius, A.; Rudinskaite, G.; Sangaila, E.; Bausys, R.; Stratilatovas, E. Early versus standard closure of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 120, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thalheimer, A.; Bueter, M.; Kortuem, M.; Thiede, A.; Meyer, D. Morbidity of Temporary Loop Ileostomy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum 2006, 49, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Back, E.; Häggström, J.; Holmgren, K.; Haapamäki, M.M.; Matthiessen, P.; Rutegård, J.; Rutegård, M. Permanent stoma rates after anterior resection for rectal cancer: Risk prediction scoring using preoperative variables. Br. J. Surg. 2021, 108, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, Q.; Liu, Z.-S.; Qian, Q.; Sun, Q.; Pan, D.-Y.; He, Y.-M. Treatment of upper gastrointestinal fistula and leakage with personal stage nutrition support. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sohn, N.; Weinstein, M.A. Use of total parenteral nutrition as a “Medical colostomy” in management of severe lacerations of the sphincter: Report of a case. Dis. Colon Rectum 1977, 20, 695–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Nardi, P.; Elmore, U.; Maggi, G.; Maggiore, R.; Boni, L.; Cassinotti, E.; Fumagalli, U.; Gardani, M.; De Pascale, S.; Parise, P.; et al. Intraoperative angiography with indocyanine green to assess anastomosis perfusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg. Endosc. 2020, 34, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jafari, M.D.; Pigazzi, A.; McLemore, E.C.; Mutch, M.G.; Haas, E.; Rasheid, S.H.; Wait, A.D.; Paquette, I.M.; Bardakcioglu, O.; Safar, B.; et al. Perfusion Assessment in Left-Sided/Low Anterior Resection (PILLAR III): A Randomized, Controlled, Parallel, Multicenter Study Assessing Perfusion Outcomes with PINPOINT Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in Low Anterior Resection. Dis. Colon Rectum 2021, 64, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Guo, T.; Keranmu, A.; Liu, F.; Xu, Y. Temporary Diverting Stoma Improves Recovery of Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pisarska, M.; Gajewska, N.; Małczak, P.; Wysocki, M.; Witowski, J.; Torbicz, G.; Major, P.; Mizera, M.; Dembiński, M.; Migaczewski, M.; et al. Defunctioning ileostomy reduces leakage rate in rectal cancer surgery—Systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 20816–20825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Gustafsson, U.O.; Scott, M.J.; Schwenk, W.; Demartines, N.; Roulin, D.; Francis, N.; McNaught, C.E.; Macfie, J.; Liberman, A.S.; Soop, M.; et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colonic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World J. Surg. 2013, 37, 259–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Maroney, S.; De Paz, C.C.; Duldulao, M.; Kim, T.; Reeves, M.E.; Kazanjian, K.K.; Solomon, N.; Garberoglio, C. Complications of Diverting Ileostomy after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Carcinoma. Am. Surg. 2016, 82, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ihnát, P.; Guňková, P.; Peteja, M.; Vávra, P.; Pelikán, A.; Zonča, P. Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: High price of protection. Surg. Endosc. 2016, 30, 4809–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Detailed patients, surgery, and outcomes characteristics.
Table 1. Detailed patients, surgery, and outcomes characteristics.
PatientAgeASAGender (M/F)BMIRisk FactorsIndication for SurgerySurgery (Open/Laparoscopic) Indications for IleostomyHighest CRP (mg/L)Postoperative Complications
155IIF25.6Carcinoma of the fallopian tubeCarcinoma penetrating the rectal wallOpenLow anastomosis (8 cm from anal verge)
Positive methylene blue test
56.6None
255IIIF43.5Morbid obesityCarcinoma of the sigmoid colonLaparoscopic converted to openLow anastomosis (10 cm from anal verge)
Obesity
219.8Postoperative wound seroma
361IIIF23.1Acute renal failure
Hypokalaemia
Hyponatraemia
Sepsis
Adenoma of the sigmoid colon (McKittrick–Wheelock syndrome)LaparoscopicRenal failure181.9Postoperative fever (second postoperative day)
477IIIF33.2Disseminated carcinoma of the uterusUterine carcinoma penetrating the rectal wallOpenLow anastomosis (5 cm from anal verge)71.7None
550IIIEM40.9Chronic renal failure
Haemodialysis
Morbid obesity
Rectal carcinomaLaparoscopicLow anastomosis (7 cm from anal verge)
Obesity
Renal failure
43.3None
643IIM22.6Neoadjuvant chemoradiationRectal carcinomaLaparoscopicLow anastomosis (2 cm from anal verge)21.3None
ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology score; M/F: Male/Female; BMI: Body mass index; CRP: C-reactive protein.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kryzauskas, M.; Jakubauskas, M.; Gendvilaite, N.; Rudaitis, V.; Poskus, T. Bowel Rest with Total Parenteral Nutrition as an Alternative to Diverting Ileostomy in High-Risk Colorectal Anastomosis: A Pilot Study. Medicina 2022, 58, 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040510

AMA Style

Kryzauskas M, Jakubauskas M, Gendvilaite N, Rudaitis V, Poskus T. Bowel Rest with Total Parenteral Nutrition as an Alternative to Diverting Ileostomy in High-Risk Colorectal Anastomosis: A Pilot Study. Medicina. 2022; 58(4):510. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040510

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kryzauskas, Marius, Matas Jakubauskas, Neda Gendvilaite, Vilius Rudaitis, and Tomas Poskus. 2022. "Bowel Rest with Total Parenteral Nutrition as an Alternative to Diverting Ileostomy in High-Risk Colorectal Anastomosis: A Pilot Study" Medicina 58, no. 4: 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040510

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop