Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of the Legal Considerations Surrounding Medicines Management
Next Article in Special Issue
A Typical Case Presentation with Spontaneous Visual Recovery in Patient Diagnosed with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Due to Rare Point Mutation in MT-ND4 Gene (m.11253T>C) and Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Accuracy of Contrast Extravasation on Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Severe Pelvic Hemorrhage in Pelvic Trauma Patients: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Epidemiological and Clinical Findings from the Latvian Registry of Primary Congenital Glaucoma and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 57
Issue 1
10.3390/medicina57010064
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Update on Gene Therapy Clinical Trials for Choroideremia and Potential Experimental Therapies

by
Alessandro Abbouda
1,
Filippo Avogaro
2,
Mariya Moosajee
3,4,5,6 and
Enzo Maria Vingolo
1,2,*
1
Fiorini Hospital Terracina AUSL, 04019 Terracina, Latina, Italy
2
Department of Sense Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Sapienza University of Rome, p.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, UK
4
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London EC1V 2PD, UK
5
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
6
The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2021, 57(1), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010064
Submission received: 27 November 2020 / Revised: 26 December 2020 / Accepted: 7 January 2021 / Published: 12 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Inherited Retinal Degenerations)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: Choroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked recessive chorioretinal dystrophy caused by mutations involving the CHM gene. Gene therapy has entered late-phase clinical trials, although there have been variable results. This review gives a summary on the outcomes of phase I/II CHM gene therapy trials and describes other potential experimental therapies. Materials and Methods: A Medline (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) search was performed to identify all articles describing gene therapy treatments available for CHM. Results: Five phase I/II clinical trials that reported subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus Rab escort protein 1 (AAV2.REP1) vector in CHM patients were included. The Oxford study (NCT01461213) included 14 patients; a median gain of 5.5 ± 6.8 SD (−6 min, 18 max) early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters was reported. The Tubingen study (NCT02671539) included six patients; only one patient had an improvement of 17 ETDRS letters. The Alberta study (NCT02077361) enrolled six patients, and it reported a minimal vision change, except for one patient who gained 15 ETDRS letters. Six patients were enrolled in the Miami trial (NCT02553135), which reported a median gain of 2 ± 4 SD (−1 min, 10 max) ETDRS letters. The Philadelphia study (NCT02341807) included 10 patients; best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) returned to baseline in all by one-year follow-up, but one patient had −17 ETDRS letters from baseline. Overall, 40 patients were enrolled in trials, and 34 had 2 years of follow-up, with a median gain of 1.5 ± 7.2 SD (−14 min, 18 max) in ETDRS letters. Conclusions: The primary endpoint, BCVA following gene therapy in CHM, showed a marginal improvement with variability between trials. Optimizing surgical technique and pre-, peri-, and post-operative management with immunosuppressants to minimize any adverse ocular inflammatory events could lead to reduced incidence of complications. The ideal therapeutic window needs to be addressed to ensure that the necessary cell types are adequately transduced, minimizing viral toxicity, to prolong long-term transgenic potential. Long-term efficacy will be addressed by ongoing studies.

1. Introduction

Choroideremia (CHM) (MIM #303100) is a rare X-linked recessive disorder resulting in progressive degeneration of the photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and choroid [1,2]. It has a prevalence of 1 in 50,000–100,000 and is caused by mutations in the CHM gene on chromosome Xq21.2 [3]. It encodes Rab escort protein 1 (REP1), which binds to Rab proteins [4,5], facilitating lipid modification through the addition of a geranyl-geranyl group to their C-terminus (known as prenylation). The prenylated Rab protein is then escorted by REP1 and delivered to the target intracellular compartment [4]. Despite CHM being ubiquitously expressed, the primary site of the disease is the retina, as certain Rabs prefer to be prenylated by REP1 over the isoform REP2 [6].
Due to the X-linked inheritance, males are predominantly affected, demonstrating signs of poor night vision that becomes apparent between the ages of 5 and 25 years [7]. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) declines slowly with age, and the mean onset of moderate visual impairment occurs in the fifth decade, and, when the macular involvement is evident, visual acuity (VA) becomes asymmetrical [8]. In some patients with preserved central macula, VA can be maintained until late stages of the disease [7,8,9]. Reduction of VA is associated with patchy peripheral visual field loss, which firstly manifests as a mid-peripheral ring scotoma, with later evolution to the complete loss of the peripheral field [10]. Despite retaining good central VA until advanced stages, early change in color vision is reported [11]. The tritan discrimination is predominantly detected using the Cambridge Colour Test [12]. This defect is easy to explain due to the density reduction of S cones located parafoveally compared to M and L cones located centrally [12,13]. In the early stages, fundus examination shows peripheral pigmentary clumping at the level of the RPE that evolves into areas of chorioretinal atrophy [14]. This degenerative process begins at the equator following a centripetal and centrifugal distribution [15]. The same degenerative process is also noted around the optic disc, while a central island of relatively preserved retinal tissue remains even in advanced stages [16].
In order to investigate these retinal changes, several structural and functional tests have been used [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) can monitor the progressive concentric loss of autofluorescence, retaining a residual retinal island at the macula of preserved autofluorescence (PAF) [21]. FAF reflects lipofuscin distribution and the signal originating from the RPE (with the photoreceptors contributing in part) [21,26]. The most common pattern is characterized by decreased FAF with sharp demarcated borders of increased signal from residual degenerating retinal tissue [14,16]. The rate of FAF loss was estimated to be 7.7% per year [21]. Areas of PAF have been reported to be vertically expanded and favoring the central and the temporal side of the macula [20]. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) reveals attenuation of the ellipsoid zone, [18,22] reduction of outer nuclear layer thickness [22], and outer retinal tubulations due to primary RPE dysfunction [18,23]. In CHM children until the fourth decade, an asymptomatic increase in central retinal thickness without other signs of retinal edema has been described [16]. In CHM adults, macular cystic edema was also identified [11,18,27] and correlated with progressive decrease in VA and poor prognostic outcomes [18]. OCT angiography (OCTA) [24,28] has shown the ability to detect vascular changes in retinal and choroidal circulations noninvasively in CHM, highlighting decreased vascular density [17,19] that precedes photoreceptor loss [20]. Confocal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) is able to provide effective photoreceptor cellular structure characterization [23,25]. A cone density reduction around the fovea was recognized as the early pathogenic effect of CHM mutation on cellular function [29]. Pathological features were identified as normal foveal cone distribution with peripheral abnormalities or increased foveal cone spacing with normal cone mosaic in retinal eccentricities [23]. Those features are associated with pathological retinal loci and are likely indicative of advanced disease stages [30,31]. Microperimetry highlighted cone and rod system dysfunction sensitivity [21,32,33], with the rod-mediated measurements being more severely affected. Nasal retinal sensitivity appeared to decline earlier than temporal retina, which mirrors a similar pattern of FAF island shrinkage reported previously [21]. Abnormal dark adaptation with a rod intercept time longer than 20 min has been reported [20].
CHM is amenable to gene therapy treatment because it is a monogenic disease, and the cDNA (1.9 kb) is within the size capacity of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors (4.7 kb) [34,35]. Lentivirus vectors were used to introduce CHM cDNA in a mouse model, but they showed limited affinity to photoreceptors [36,37]. AAV vectors were able to restore REP1 expression and prenylation function in cell cultures of fibroblasts and lymphocytes derived from CHM patients [38] and improve phagocytosis and trafficking defects in cell cultures of nonhuman primates [39]. Tolmachova and colleagues developed an AAV2 vector (AAV2/2–CBA–REP1) and successfully achieved CHM transgene expression in human and mouse photoreceptors and RPE cells [40]. The advances in preclinical studies lead to the first-in-human gene therapy clinical trial for CHM (NCT01461213) using an adeno-associated virus Rab escort protein 1 (AAV2.REP1) vector in 2011 and from then several multicenter clinical trials worldwide. The aim of this review is to give a summary on the outcomes of CHM gene therapy trials in phase I/II.

2. Materials and Methods

Published journal articles based on gene therapy trials for CHM were collected following a specific literature search performed in four stages according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [41]. Stage 1 (unique citations): A Medline (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) search was performed to identify all articles describing gene therapy treatment available in CHM. Keyword searches used were ‘‘CHM’’ and (‘‘AAV + Vectors” or ‘‘gene + therapy + clinical trials’’). Stage 2 (article retrieval): All abstracts from the Medline searches were scrutinized to identify the articles that reported clinical results. Only journal articles published in English were included. Copies of the articles were obtained, and their bibliographies were searched manually for additional articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Stage 3 (article inclusion): Complete articles were reviewed to identify those that reported results of gene therapy in CHM patients [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Stage 4 (article exclusion): We did not include four clinical trials as the results had not yet been published.

Data Abstractions and Analysis

A meticulous and systematic review of complete CHM articles was performed. According to the Second Monaciano Symposium [53], clinically meaningful endpoints acceptable to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) and used in CHM clinical trials are reported in Table 1.
In order to compare results among five clinical trials, only BCVA was considered as an outcome because the other parameters were partially reported and not comparable because individual data for each patient were not available. These data are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/1/64/s1 Table S1. According to Shen et al. [54], BCVA alone may still have utility as a primary endpoint for patients older than 39 years who have measurable vision decline, while for younger patients additional disease biomarkers are required.
All data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 97-2003 (Microsoft Corporation, WA, USA). Patient population characteristics were recorded. Complications and their treatments were noted.

3. Results

Five CHM gene therapy phase I/II clinical trials were identified for inclusion in this review, and Table 2 summarizes data items from each one [42,43,44,45,46]. The first-in-human gene therapy clinical trial for CHM (NCT01461213) started in 2011 using an AAV2.REP1 vector. In total, 14 patients were recruited at different disease stages and underwent pars plana vitrectomy followed by retinotomy and injection of AAV2.REP1 particles; the median age was 45.5 ± 12.6 SD years (24 min, 72 max). The full report of all 14 cases from this Phase I/II trial, including seven patients who received a high vector dose (1 × 1011 gene particles (gp) in 0.1 mL), shows a median gain of 5.5 early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters in the treated eye [45]. Median ETDRS baseline letters vs. ETDRS letters at 2 years of follow-up were 68.5 ± 18.8 SD letters (23 min, 89 max) vs. 73 ± 13.9 SD letters (41 min, 94 max), respectively. Overall, the median gain of ETDRS letters was 5.5 ± 6.8 SD (−6 min, 18 max). Complications occurred in two patients due to surgically induced retinal stretching in the first case and intraocular inflammation (vitritis and choroiditis) in the second case [45,55]. Twelve patients without complications gained a median of 5.5 letters above their baseline (ETDRS letters details for each patient are reported in Table 2), while the two patients with complications lost 15 and 14 letters, respectively [45].
Three other clinical trials (in Tubingen, Alberta, and Miami) using the same vector as the NCT01461213 study at the higher dose (1 × 1011 gp in 0.1 mL) recruited six patients per trial. In the Tubingen group (NCT02671539) [43], the median age was 52.5 ± 4.1 SD years (51 min, 60 max). Median ETDRS baseline letters vs. ETDRS at 1 year of follow-up were 61 ± 13.2 SD letters (46 min, 77 max) vs. 63 ± 12.5 SD letters (46 min, 77 max), respectively. Only one patient had an improvement of 17 ETDRS letters. In the Alberta group (NCT02077361) [42], the median age was 33.5 ± 5 SD years (29 min, 42 max). Median baseline ETDRS letters vs. 2 years of follow-up was 64 ± 8.7 SD letters (53 min, 75 max) vs. 66 ± 10.1 SD letters (53 min, 76 max), respectively. Overall, a minimal median gain in letters of 0 ± 7.5 SD ETDRS letters (−8 min, 15 max) was reported despite one patient gaining 15 letters and another with a loss of 8 letters in one treated eye (secondary to an intraoperative complication) at 2 years post-treatment. In the Miami group (NCT02553135) [44], the median age was 50 ± 12.7 SD years (32 min, 72 max). Median baseline ETDRS vs. 2 years of follow-up was 63 ± 8.8 SD (56 min, 77 max) vs. 70.5 ± 9.8 (56 min, 79 max), respectively. Overall, there was a median gain of 2 ± 4 SD ETDRS letters (−1 min, 10 max).
The Philadelphia study (NCT02341807) included 10 patients between 26 and 57 years of age at time of injection. Five patients received uniocular subfoveal injections of low dose (up to 5 × 1010 gene particles (gp) in 0.1 mL) and five of high dose (up to 1 × 1011 gene particles (gp) in 0.1 mL). No data for each individual patient were reported, but by 2 years posttreatment, BCVA returned to baseline in all but one patient who was −17 ETDRS letters from baseline. With the exclusion of this patient, mean BCVA at 2 years was similar in injected (−1.7 letters) compared with uninjected (−0.3 letters) eyes. Two patients showed an improvement of 5–6 ETDRS letters in the injected eye compared with baseline and the uninjected control.
Overall, 40 patients were enrolled. Baseline ETDRS was 65 ± 14.3 letters. Thirty-four patients had a follow-up of 2 years, with a median of 72 ± 11.8 SD (41 min, 94 max) ETDRS letters recorded.
Complications post-injection were reported in 29 of 40 patients. There were two serious adverse events (SAE). One patient had an air bubble in the subretinal space, and one patient had localized foveal thinning after the injection. This, in addition to the adverse event (AE) related to excessive foveal stretch in one patient, resulted in the development of an automated injection system and intraoperative OCT guidance [55,56]. The most common post-injection symptom was metamorphopsia (nine cases), which recovered in eight cases while continuing in one patient. Mild post-operative inflammation was a quite common AE, characterized by anterior chamber reaction (four cases) and vitritis (two cases) that resolved with systemic and topical steroid.
Minor and expected AEs included: subconjuntival hemorrage (12 cases), which resolved in all cases; flashing lights (seven cases), which continued in four cases; and persistent vitreous floaters (two cases). Cataract formation is an expected complication related to the vitrectomy procedure and eight patients had cataract surgery in the treated eye after completion of 2 years follow-up.
Minor and unexpected AEs included changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) level. One patient was diagnosed to have steroid induced ocular hypertension post-injection. The IOP was managed by adding antiglaucoma medications. He recovered with visual field sequelae. Six patients had IOP reduction that resolved spontaneously in all cases. Details about each AE for each clinical trial are reported in Table 3.
There are four ongoing clinical trials in phases II and III. These studies are summarized in Table 4. Up to now, results have not yet been published and hence could not be included for data analysis.

4. Discussion

Gene therapy for CHM has reached phase III clinical trials, providing real promise for patients. Review of the ongoing trials has shown that 40 patients have been treated so far with an AAV2-REP1 vector. The most common AEs were subconjunctival hemorrhage, blurred vision metamorphopsia, and a post-operative IOP reduction. The most AE was acute localized foveal thinning, retinal stretching, and intraocular inflammation (vitritis and choroiditis) in three patients. However, overall increased vision with an average gain of 3.1 ETDRS letters (−14 to 18 ETDRS letters) has been ascertained.
Despite the promising results, in order to prolong the long-term transgenic potential and the need for repeat treatments, several challenges remain to be addressed, such as defining the ideal therapeutic window, ensuring that the necessary cell types are adequately transduced, and minimizing viral toxicity. Many of these questions will be answered by ongoing clinical trials, such as the REGENERATE trial phase II (Oxford and Moorfields Eye Hospitals, UK), the GEMINI trial phase II (Tubingen, Germany), and a phase III international multicenter gene therapy STAR trial. Up to now, results have not yet been published for these trials.
Regarding viral toxicity, the vector used for RPE65 retinal dystrophy (Luxturna, Spark Therapeutics Inc., USA) included a strong ubiquitous promoter that targets multiple cell types, including the RPE and the photoreceptors. The solution was adjusted to pH 7.3 and subjected to removal of empty capsids [57,58]. Several strategies are being used to optimize AAV vectors, ranging from the addition of exogenous agents for immune evasion to genetic manipulation of the viral capsid. Continued work in these areas should be followed in order to improve targeting, transgene expression, and immune evasion improving the translational success [59]. The vector construct used, AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA, is identical to the vector used in Luxturna, except for the CHM transgene. In order to reduce post-injection inflammation, all trials used a systemic steroid treatment that included 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone for 10 days (beginning 2 days prior to gene therapy, on the day of surgery, and for 7 days afterward), followed by 0.5 mg/kg/day for 7 days, 0.25 mg/kg/day for 2 days, and 0.125 mg/kg/day for 2 days. The NCT02671539 (Tubingen) trial also reported a combination of moxifloxacin and dexamethasone eye drops for 21 days. In order to improve the safety profile of the gene therapy and to reduce the risk related to sub-retinal injection, 4D Molecular Therapeutics (4DMT) optimized the AAV vector and designed a new drug: 4D-100 (Roche Pharma AG) comprises an AAV capsid variant carrying a transgene encoding a codon-optimized human CHM gene to be delivered by intravitreal injection. Due to its optimized vector, 4D-110 is a novel gene therapy approach that shows promise in safely treating a broad region of the retina and a broad range of patients. The clinical trial (NCT04483440) was designed to assess the preliminary safety, tolerability, and biological activity of a single intravitreal injection of 4D-110. Up to now, 15 patients were enrolled, and the estimated study completion date is May 2023.

4.1. Small Molecule Drugs for CHM

In addition to gene therapy, there are several alternative strategies under development with a potential to treat CHM. About 30% of CHM cases are related to in-frame nonsense mutations, resulting in premature termination codons (PTCs) [60,61]. Small molecule drugs based on aminoglycosides can promote ribosomal read-through of PTCs during translation through competitive binding of near-cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs (tRNAs) instead of eukaryotic release factors (eRFs) [60,62]. In order to halt the progression of recessive disease, 20–25% of wild type levels of functional protein need to be restored [62].
Among the compounds with proven read-through activity are traditional aminoglycosides (gentamicin, paromomycin and geneticin (G418)), the less toxic next-generation designer aminoglycoside-derivatives (NB84, NB74, and NB124), non-aminoglycoside small molecule drugs (PTC124 and PTC414), and small molecule read-through (SMRT) compounds (RTC13, RTC14, GJ071, and GJ072) [62,63]. PTC124 (also known as ataluren or Translarna) has received NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) approval for Duchenne muscular dystrophy treatment caused by nonsense mutations in the dystrophin gene [64].
In vitro and in vivo preclinical testing of ataluren in models of CHM has led to some promising results with improved REP1 expression [65]. Limitations in the evolution of this treatment are the lack of suitable ocular preparations for targeted drug delivery, the lack of specificity for the gene of interest, hence risk of overriding other random PTCs in the genome, and the decreased availability of transcripts due to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), thus reducing the substrate for the drug action [62]. It is possible that combining read-through agents with NMD pathway inhibitors (e.g., caffeine, NMDI1, VG1) or dual action agents (amlexanox) could enhance therapeutic benefit [63,66,67,68].

4.2. Stem Cell Therapies

Stem cell regenerative approaches are an alternative future treatment for CHM, but there is still a need to identify the correct cell type and the adequate stem cell system in order to achieve tissue regeneration. In addition, the delivery method and the therapeutic window need to be assessed [36].
Skin fibroblast-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology has been used to differentiate RPE cells, which have been used in clinical trials for treating wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in Japan, and retinal progenitor cells were injected intravitreally in a Phase IIb clinical trial for retinitis pigmentosa (NCT02320812) [69]. Recently, hESC-derived RPE cells layered on synthetic membrane have been reported to improve visual acuity (visual acuity gain of 29 and 21 letters, respectively) in two patients with acute wet AMD and rapid deterioration in visual acuity [70]. Further research is required for inherited retinal diseases because, being a chronic disease, they may have long-term structural changes with atrophy that may prevent this form of therapy from being successful.

4.3. Neuroprotection Agents

Neuroprotectants are being investigated, such as antioxidants and lutein supplements. They have been found to delay disease progression and result in visual acuity improvement in retinitis pigmentosa [71,72]. Lutein is a xanthophyll carotenoid found in high quantities in green leafy vegetables; it is able to augment macular pigment function through short-wavelength filtration and reactive oxygen species stabilization [73]. Oral supplementation with lutein for 6 months has been studied in CHM patients but there was no measurable benefit in terms of foveal sensitivity and central visual acuity [73].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) underlie the pathophysiology of diverse neurodegenerative diseases. To control the oxidation process, cells need to activate and deploy endogenous antioxidant defenses. Oxidative stress is caused by an imbalance between the antioxidant defense system and the production of ROS. In the retina, the source and impact of ROS are different depending on the pathology. RPE is particularly susceptible to ROS formation due to its high consumption of oxygen, high proportion of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and constant exposure to light, inducing an increase of photoreceptor cells apoptosis [74]. However, in most inherited photoreceptor degenerations (IPDs), it is suggested that photoreceptors death may be mechanistically different [75]. One possible source of oxidative stress in IPDs is oxygen toxicity in the outer retina due to reduced consumption by photoreceptors mitochondria [76].
Mutations in the glyoxalase 1 (GLO 1) enzyme, involved in the detoxification of a cytotoxic byproduct of glycolysis, were identified in a Sicilian family affected with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). This mutation was suggested to be associated with a faster progression of the retinal disease [77]. At least five other RP causative genes (KLHL7, RDH11, CERKL, AIPL1, and USH1G) suggested a tight connection between induced oxidative stress and RP onset with faster progression [78].
Zebrafish are a well-described CHM model that has been successfully used to highlight the efficient read-through of aminoglycosides and small molecule drugs and their toxic effects. High levels of oxidative stress were associated with chmru848 eyes, but once treated with PTC-derived small molecules, the ROS were significantly reduced [65]. Oxidative stress can play a negative role in CHM eyes, and its reduction may be beneficial. Discovering new treatments to counter ROS formation will be a step forward in preventing or slowing down the progression of CHM. Enhancing the production of antioxidant enzymes to reduce ROS or to promote cytoprotective signaling pathways may be a worthy strategy to pursue [79].

4.4. Electronic Implants

Electronic retinal implants are an alternative treatment for the final stage of CHM [80]. CHM patients with no light visual perception have been enrolled in several clinical trials testing a 44-channel suprachoriodal bionic eye device (NCT03406416) in Melbourne, Australia, and testing the Intelligent Retinal Implant System (IRIS) V1 (NCT01864486) and V2 (NCT02670980) (Pixium Vision SA). The IRIS II has demonstrated reasonable safety at 6 months with a comparable adverse effect profile compared to the Argus II implant that reaches more than 5 years of follow-up. The IRIS had an increased number of electrodes compared with the Argus II, providing better visual acuity; however, future studies will be needed to further elucidate that result [81].

5. Conclusions

This review article outlines the progress made in the field of gene therapy for CHM, and the scientific and clinical community eagerly await the results of the phase III clinical trials. So far, 40 patients have received the AAV2.REP1 vector through subretinal injection. Surgery can be challenging in CHM as there may be a small friable residual retinal island, making delivery of the vector and bleb technically difficult; this is highlighted by the high rate of intraoperative surgical complications, including acute localized foveal thinning, retinal stretching, and intraocular inflammation. Natural history studies have shown that central BCVA remains stable until 39 years [20,54] and that this may not be the most suitable primary outcome measure for clinical trials, but other parameters such as retinal sensitivity and FAF were partially reported and not comparable. There are several other therapeutic strategies under development and so optimal trial design is essential, possibly adopting a multimodal structure–function approach to assess response to treatment. The results of the phase III clinical trials are eagerly awaited to ascertain if gene therapy for CHM will become an approved treatment in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/1/64/s1, Table S1: Additional data available for each trial.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., F.A. and E.M.V.; methodology, A.A., F.A. and M.M.; software, A.A. and F.A.; validation, E.M.V. and A.A.; formal analysis, A.A. and F.A.; investigation, A.A.; resources, F.A.; data curation, F.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A. and F.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A., M.M. and E.M.V.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, E.M.V.; project administration, E.M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.M. would like to acknowledge the Wellcome Trust (Grant no. 205174/Z/16/Z), Choroideremia Research Foundation, Fight for Sight, and Moorfields Eye Charity.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leroy, B.P. Chorioretinopathies: Choroideraemia and Gyrate Atrophy. In Inherited Chorioretinal Dystrophies; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  2. McCulloch, C. Choroideremia: A clinical and pathologic review. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 1969, 67, 142–195. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cremers, F.P.M.; Van De Pol, D.J.R.; Van Kerkhoff, L.P.M.; Wieringa, B.; Ropers, H.-H. Cloning of a gene that is rearranged in patients with choroideraemia. Nature 1990, 347, 674–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pereira-Leal, J.B.; Hume, A.N.; Seabra, M.C. Prenylation of Rab GTPases: Molecular mechanisms and involvement in genetic disease. FEBS Lett. 2001, 498, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seabra, M.C.; Brown, M.S.; Goldstein, J.L. Retinal degeneration in choroideremia: Deficiency of rab geranylgeranyl transferase. Science 1993, 259, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McCulloch, J.C. The pathologic findings in two cases of choroideremia. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 1970, 54, 565–572. [Google Scholar]
  7. Roberts, M.F.; Fishman, G.A.; Roberts, D.K.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Weleber, R.G.; Anderson, R.J.; Grover, S. Retrospective, longitudinal, and cross sectional study of visual acuity impairment in choroideraemia. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002, 86, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lam, B.L.; Fischer, M.D.; Pennesi, M.E.; Sankila, E.-M.K.; Holz, F.G.; MacLaren, R.E.; Birch, D.G.; MacDonald, I.M.; Hoyng, C.C.; Black, G. Natural history of progression of choroideremia (NIGHT) study: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline characteristics. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 3899. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kärnä, J. Choroideremia. A clinical and genetic study of 84 Finnish patients and 126 female carriers. Acta Ophthalmol. Suppl. 1986, 176, 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenberg, T.; Schwartz, M. Age differences of visual field impairment and mutation spectrum in Danish choroideremia patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 1994, 72, 678–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heon, E.; Alabduljalil, T.; McGuigan, D.B.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Li, S.; Chen, S.; Jacobson, S.G. Visual Function and Central Retinal Structure in Choroideremia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, OCT377–OCT387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seitz, I.P.; Jolly, J.K.; Fischer, M.D.; Simunovic, M.P. Colour discrimination ellipses in choroideremia. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. = Albrecht Von Graefes Arch. Fur Klin. Und Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018, 256, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Simunovic, M.P. Acquired color vision deficiency. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2016, 61, 132–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moosajee, M.; Ramsden, S.C.; Black, G.C.M.; Seabra, M.C.; Webster, A.R. Clinical utility gene card for: Choroideremia. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 2014, 22, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Coussa, R.G.; Kim, J.; Traboulsi, E.I. Choroideremia: Effect of age on visual acuity in patients and female carriers. Ophthalm. Genet. 2012, 33, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, K.N.; Islam, F.; Moore, A.T.; Michaelides, M. Clinical and Genetic Features of Choroideremia in Childhood. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 2158–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Abbouda, A.; Dubis, A.M.; Webster, A.R.; Moosajee, M. Identifying characteristic features of the retinal and choroidal vasculature in choroideremia using optical coherence tomography angiography. Eye 2018, 32, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Abbouda, A.; Lim, W.S.; Sprogyte, L.; Webster, A.R.; Moosajee, M. Quantitative and Qualitative Features of Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Provide Prognostic Indicators for Visual Acuity in Patients With Choroideremia. Ophthalm. Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2017, 48, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arrigo, A.; Romano, F.; Parodi, M.B.; Issa, P.C.; Birtel, J.; Bandello, F.; MacLaren, R.E. Reduced vessel density in deep capillary plexus correlates with retinal layer thickness in choroideremia. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hagag, A.M.; Mitsios, A.; Narayan, A.; Abbouda, A.; Webster, A.R.; Dubis, A.M.; Moosajee, M. Prospective deep phenotyping of choroideremia patients using multimodal structure-function approaches. Eye 2020, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jolly, J.K.; Edwards, T.L.; Moules, J.; Groppe, M.; Downes, S.M.; MacLaren, R.E. A Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Fundus Autofluorescence Patterns in Patients With Choroideremia. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 4498–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xue, K.; Oldani, M.; Jolly, J.K.; Edwards, T.L.; Groppe, M.; Downes, S.M.; MacLaren, R.E. Correlation of Optical Coherence Tomography and Autofluorescence in the Outer Retina and Choroid of Patients with Choroideremia. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 3674–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Syed, R.; Sundquist, S.M.; Ratnam, K.; Zayit-Soudry, S.; Zhang, Y.; Crawford, J.B.; Macdonald, I.M.; Godara, P.; Rha, J.; Carroll, J.; et al. High-resolution images of retinal structure in patients with choroideremia. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 950–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fingler, J.; Readhead, C.; Schwartz, D.M.; Fraser, S. Phase-Contrast OCT Imaging of transverse flows in the mouse retina and choroid. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 5055–5059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Duncan, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Gandhi, J.; Nakanishi, C.; Othman, M.; Branham, K.E.H.; Swaroop, A.; Roorda, A. High-resolution imaging with adaptive optics in patients with inherited retinal degeneration. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 3283–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Schmitz-Valckenberg, S.; Holz, F.G.; Bird, A.C.; Spaide, R.F. Fundus autofluorescence imaging: Review and perspectives. Retina 2008, 28, 385–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Genead, M.A.; Fishman, G.A. Cystic macular oedema on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in choroideremia patients without cystic changes on fundus examination. Eye 2010, 25, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hagag, A.M.; Gao, S.S.; Jia, Y.; Huang, D. Optical coherence tomography angiography: Technical principles and clinical applications in ophthalmology. Taiwan J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 7, 115–129. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nabholz, N.; Lorenzini, M.-C.; Bocquet, B.; Lacroux, A.; Faugère, V.; Roux, A.-F.; Kalatzis, V.; Meunier, I.; Hamel, C.P. Clinical Evaluation and Cone Alterations in Choroideremia. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 1830–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morgan, J.I.W.; Han, G.; Klinman, E.; Maguire, W.M.; Chung, D.C.; Maguire, A.M.; Bennett, J. High-resolution adaptive optics retinal imaging of cellular structure in choroideremia. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 6381–6397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tuten, W.S.; Vergilio, G.K.; Young, G.J.; Bennett, J.; Maguire, A.M.; Aleman, T.S.; Brainard, D.H.; Morgan, J.I.W. Visual Function at the Atrophic Border in Choroideremia Assessed with Adaptive Optics Microperimetry. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2019, 3, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dimopoulos, I.S.; Tseng, C.; Macdonald, I.M. Microperimetry as an Outcome Measure in Choroideremia Trials: Reproducibility and Beyond. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 4151–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Jolly, J.K.; Xue, K.; Edwards, T.L.; Groppe, M.; MacLaren, R.E. Characterizing the Natural History of Visual Function in Choroideremia Using Microperimetry and Multimodal Retinal Imaging. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 5575–5583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Black, A.; Vasireddy, V.; Chung, D.C.; Maguire, A.M.; Gaddameedi, R.; Tolmachova, T.; Seabra, M.; Bennett, J. Adeno-associated virus 8-mediated gene therapy for choroideremia: Preclinical studies in in vitro and in vivo models. J. Gene Med. 2014, 16, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Patrício, M.I.; Barnard, A.R.; Xue, K.; MacLaren, R.E. Choroideremia: Molecular mechanisms and development of AAV gene therapy. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2018, 18, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chan, S.C.; Bubela, T.; Dimopoulos, I.S.; Freund, P.R.; Varkouhi, A.K.; Macdonald, I.M. Choroideremia research: Report and perspectives on the second international scientific symposium for choroideremia. Ophthalm. Genet. 2016, 37, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tolmachova, T.; Tolmachov, O.E.; Wavre-Shapton, S.T.; Tracey-White, D.; Futter, C.E.; Seabra, M.C. CHM/REP1 cDNA delivery by lentiviral vectors provides functional expression of the transgene in the retinal pigment epithelium of choroideremia mice. J. Gene Med. 2012, 14, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Anand, V.; Barral, D.C.; Zeng, Y.; Brunsmann, F.; Maguire, A.M.; Seabra, M.C.; Bennett, J. Gene therapy for choroideremia: In vitro rescue mediated by recombinant adenovirus. Vis. Res. 2003, 43, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Duong, T.T.; Vasireddy, V.; Ramachandran, P.; Herrera, P.S.; Leo, L.; Merkel, C.; Bennett, J.; Mills, J.A. Use of induced pluripotent stem cell models to probe the pathogenesis of Choroideremia and to develop a potential treatment. Stem Cell Res. 2018, 27, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tolmachova, T.; Tolmachov, O.E.; Barnard, A.R.; de Silva, S.R.; Lipinski, D.M.; Walker, N.J.; Maclaren, R.E.; Seabra, M.C. Functional expression of Rab escort protein 1 following AAV2-mediated gene delivery in the retina of choroideremia mice and human cells ex vivo. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 91, 825–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Group P: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dimopoulos, I.S.; Hoang, S.C.; Radziwon, A.; Binczyk, N.M.; Seabra, M.C.; MacLaren, R.E.; Somani, R.; Tennant, M.T.; Macdonald, I.M. Two-Year Results After AAV2-Mediated Gene Therapy for Choroideremia: The Alberta Experience. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 193, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fischer, M.D.; Ochakovski, G.A.; Beier, B.; Seitz, I.P.; Vaheb, Y.; Kortuem, C.; Reichel, F.F.L.; Kuehlewein, L.; Kahle, N.A.; Peters, T.; et al. Changes in retinal sensitivity after gene therapy in choroideremia. Retina 2020, 40, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lam, B.L.; Davis, J.L.; Gregori, N.Z.; MacLaren, R.E.; Girach, A.; Verriotto, J.D.; Rodriguez, B.; Rosa, P.R.; Zhang, X.; Feuer, W.J. Choroideremia Gene Therapy Phase 2 Clinical Trial: 24-Month Results. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 197, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. MacLaren, R.E.; Xue, K.; Barnard, A.R.; Edwards, T.L.; Downes, S.; Lotery, A.; Black, G.; Webster, A.; Jolly, J.K.; Seabra, M.C. Retinal Gene Therapy for Choroideremia in a Multicenter Dose Escalation Phase I/II Clinical Trial. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 1195. [Google Scholar]
  46. Aleman, T.S.; Huckfeldt, R.M.; Serrano, L.; Vergilio, G.; Pearson, D.J.; Uyhazi, K.E.; McCague, S.; Marshall, K.; Chung, D.C.; Liu, E.; et al. AAV2-hCHM Subretinal Delivery to the Macula in Choroideremia: 2 year Results of an Ongoing Phase I/II Gene Therapy Trial. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 5173. [Google Scholar]
  47. Brooks, S.; Benjaminy, S.; Bubela, T. Participant perspectives on a phase I/II ocular gene therapy trial (NCT02077361). Ophthalm. Genet. 2019, 40, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Edwards, T.L.; Jolly, J.K.; Groppe, M.; Barnard, A.R.; Cottriall, C.L.; Tolmachova, T.; Black, G.C.; Webster, A.R.; Lotery, A.J.; Holder, G.E.; et al. Visual Acuity after Retinal Gene Therapy for Choroideremia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 1996–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fischer, M.D.; Ochakovski, G.A.; Beier, B.; Seitz, I.P.; Vaheb, Y.; Kortuem, C.; Reichel, F.F.L.; Kuehlewein, L.; Kahle, N.A.; Peters, T.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Retinal Gene Therapy Using Adeno-Associated Virus Vector for Patients with Choroideremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019, 137, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. MacLaren, R.E.; Groppe, M.; Barnard, A.R.; Cottriall, C.L.; Tolmachova, T.; Seymour, L.; Clark, K.R.; During, M.J.; Cremers, F.P.; Black, G.C.; et al. Retinal gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: Initial findings from a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet 2014, 383, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Xue, K.; Jolly, J.K.; Barnard, A.R.; Rudenko, A.; Salvetti, A.P.; Patrício, M.I.; Edwards, T.L.; Groppe, M.; Orlans, H.O.; Tolmachova, T.; et al. Beneficial effects on vision in patients undergoing retinal gene therapy for choroideremia. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1507–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xue, K.; MacLaren, R.E. Ocular gene therapy for choroideremia: Clinical trials and future perspectives. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol. 2018, 13, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Thompson, D.A.; Iannaccone, A.; Ali, R.R.; Arshavsky, V.Y.; Audo, I.; Bainbridge, J.W.B.; Besirli, C.G.; Birch, D.G.; Branham, K.E.; Cideciyan, A.V.; et al. Advancing Clinical Trials for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Recommendations from the Second Monaciano Symposium. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shen, L.L.; Ahluwalia, A.; Sun, M.; Young, B.; Nardini, H.K.G.; Del Priore, L.V. Long-term natural history of visual acuity in eyes with choroideremia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 1004 individual eyes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xue, K.; Groppe, M.; Salvetti, A.P.; MacLaren, R.E. Technique of retinal gene therapy: Delivery of viral vector into the subretinal space. Eye 2017, 31, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Simunovic, M.P.; Xue, K.; Jolly, J.K.; MacLaren, R.E. Structural and Functional Recovery Following Limited Iatrogenic Macular Detachment for Retinal Gene Therapy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Maguire, A.M.; Simonelli, F.; Pierce, E.A.; Pugh, E.N., Jr.; Mingozzi, F.; Bennicelli, J.; Banfi, S.; Marshall, K.A.; Testa, F.; Surace, E.M.; et al. Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 2240–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Russell, S.R.; Bennett, J.; Wellman, J.A.; Chung, D.C.; Yu, Z.-F.; Tillman, A.; Wittes, J.; Pappas, J.; Elci, O.; McCague, S.; et al. Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65 -mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017, 390, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mitchell, A.M.; Nicolson, S.C.; Warischalk, J.K.; Samulski, R.J. AAV’s anatomy: Roadmap for optimizing vectors for translational success. Curr. Gene Ther. 2010, 10, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Way, C.M.; Cunha, D.L.; Moosajee, M. Translational readthrough inducing drugs for the treatment of inherited retinal dystrophies. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol. 2020, 15, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Torriano, S.; Erkilic, N.; Baux, D.; Cereso, N.; De Luca, V.; Meunier, I.; Moosajee, M.; Roux, A.F.; Hamel, C.P.; Kalatzis, V. The effect of PTC124 on choroideremia fibroblasts and iPSC-derived RPE raises considerations for therapy. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Richardson, R.; Smart, M.; Tracey-White, D.; Webster, A.R.; Moosajee, M. Mechanism and evidence of nonsense suppression therapy for genetic eye disorders. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 155, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Guerin, K.; Gregory-Evans, C.Y.; Hodges, M.; Moosajee, M.; Mackay, D.S.; Gregory-Evans, K.; Flannery, J.G. Systemic aminoglycoside treatment in rodent models of retinitis pigmentosa. Exp. Eye Res. 2008, 87, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bushby, K.; Finkel, R.; Wong, B.; Barohn, R.; Campbell, C.; Comi, G.P.; Connolly, A.M.; Day, J.W.; Flanigan, K.M.; Goemans, N.; et al. Ataluren treatment of patients with nonsense mutation dystrophinopathy. Muscle Nerve 2014, 50, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Moosajee, M.; Tracey-White, D.; Smart, M.; Weetall, M.; Torriano, S.; Kalatzis, V.; Da Cruz, L.; Coffey, P.; Webster, A.R.; Welch, E. Functional rescue of REP1 following treatment with PTC124 and novel derivative PTC-414 in human choroideremia fibroblasts and the nonsense-mediated zebrafish model. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 3416–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Gonzalez-Hilarion, S.; Beghyn, T.; Jia, J.; Debreuck, N.; Berte, G.; Mamchaoui, K.; Mouly, V.; Gruenert, D.C.; Benoit, D.; Lejeune, F. Rescue of nonsense mutations by amlexanox in human cells. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2012, 7, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gotham, V.J.B.; Hobbs, M.C.; Burgin, R.; Turton, D.; Smythe, C.; Coldham, I. Synthesis and activity of a novel inhibitor of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 1559–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sarkar, H.; Mitsios, A.; Smart, M.; Skinner, J.; Welch, A.A.; Kalatzis, V.; Coffey, P.J.; Dubis, A.M.; Webster, A.R.; Moosajee, M. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay efficiency varies in choroideremia providing a target to boost small molecule therapeutics. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 1865–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mandai, M.; Watanabe, A.; Kurimoto, Y.; Hirami, Y.; Morinaga, C.; Daimon, T.; Fujihara, M.; Akimaru, H.; Sakai, N.; Shibata, Y.; et al. Autologous Induced Stem-Cell–Derived Retinal Cells for Macular Degeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. da Cruz, L.; Fynes, K.; Georgiadis, O.; Kerby, J.; Luo, Y.H.; Ahmado, A.; Vernon, A.; Daniels, J.T.; Nommiste, B.; Hasan, S.M. Phase 1 clinical study of an embryonic stem cell–derived retinal pigment epithelium patch in age-related macular degeneration. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Aleman, T.S.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Windsor, E.A.M.; Schwartz, S.B.; Swider, M.; Chico, J.D.; Sumaroka, A.; Pantelyat, A.Y.; Duncan, K.G.; Gardner, L.M.; et al. Macular Pigment and Lutein Supplementation inABCA4-Associated Retinal Degenerations. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 1319–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rayapudi, S.; Schwartz, S.G.; Wang, R.; Chavis, P. Vitamin A and fish oils for retinitis pigmentosa. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 12, CD008428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Duncan, J.L.; Aleman, T.S.; Gardner, L.M.; De Castro, E.; Marks, D.A.; Emmons, J.M.; Bieber, M.L.; Steinberg, J.D.; Bennetta, J.; Stone, E.M.; et al. Macular Pigment and Lutein Supplementation in Choroideremia. Exp. Eye Res. 2002, 74, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Masuda, T.; Shimazawa, M.; Hara, H. Retinal Diseases Associated with Oxidative Stress and the Effects of a Free Radical Scavenger (Edaravone). Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Punzo, C.; Kornacker, K.; Cepko, C. Stimulation of the insulin/mTOR pathway delays cone death in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 12, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Vlachantoni, D.; Bramall, A.N.; Murphy, M.P.; Taylor, R.W.; Shu, X.; Tulloch, B.; Van Veen, T.; Turnbull, D.M.; McInnes, R.R.; Wright, A.F. Evidence of severe mitochondrial oxidative stress and a protective effect of low oxygen in mouse models of inherited photoreceptor degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 20, 322–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Donato, L.; Scimone, C.; Nicocia, G.; Denaro, L.; Robledo, R.; Sidoti, A.; D’Angelo, R. GLO1 gene polymorphisms and their association with retinitis pigmentosa: A case–control study in a Sicilian population. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 45, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Donato, L.; Bramanti, P.; Scimone, C.; Rinaldi, C.; D’Angelo, R.; Sidoti, A. miRNAexpression profile of retinal pigment epithelial cells under oxidative stress conditions. FEBS Open Bio 2018, 8, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Domènech, E.B.; Marfany, G. The Relevance of Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Retinal Dystrophies. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zrenner, E. Fighting Blindness with Microelectronics. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 210ps16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, V.; Kuriyan, A.E. Optoelectronic Devices for Vision Restoration. Curr. Ophthalmol. Rep. 2020, 8, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Functional and structural imaging outcome measures in choroideremia (CHM) clinical trials according to the Second Monaciano Symposium.
Table 1. Functional and structural imaging outcome measures in choroideremia (CHM) clinical trials according to the Second Monaciano Symposium.
Representative TestsOutcome
BCVAVisual acuity
Farnsworth D-15Color vision
Pelli-Robson; quick CSFContrast sensitivity
MicroperimetryMacular sensitivity
Questionnaires: VFQ-25, Cardiff Visual AbilityPatient-reported visual outcome
Speed; PrecisionReading
SD-OCTRetinal structure
FAFAutofluorescence
Legend: BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; CSF: contrast sensitivity function; VFQ: Visual Function Questionnaire; SD-OCT: spectral domain optical coherence tomography; FAF: fundus autofluorescence.
Table
Table 2. Completed and registered studies involving CHM gene therapy with AAV2-REP1.
Table 2. Completed and registered studies involving CHM gene therapy with AAV2-REP1.
Clinical Trial Registration,
Location and Phase		PatientAgeBCVA Baseline ETDRSBCVA 1 YearBCVA 2 YearsMutation
NCT01461213
University of Oxford, UK
October 2011
Sponsor: University of Oxford
Phase I/II low and high dose, open label, 14 male participants, subretinal injection AAV2-REP1 (AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA)		L163234541c.940+2T>C
L247797973c.189+1G>C
L336899194c.492_493delGA
L455536961c.535_538delGAAA
L541797576c.529delG
H138777878c.799C>T
H243767480c.877C>T
H341707079c.1264C>T
H459616170c.1335_1336insA
H572677073c.757C>T
H655606063c.799C>T
H724395453c.525_526delAG
#C157 c.819+1G>T
#C244 c.130G>T
NCT02077361
University of Alberta, Canada
April 2015
Sponsor: Ian M. MacDonald
Phase I/II single dose, open label, 6 male participants, subretinal injection AAV2-REP1 (AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA)		P14253No data available for the 1 year follow-up53c.315-?_1166+?del
P2356176c.1218C>A
P3296759c.1218C>A
P4387373c1245-521A>G
P5325858c.224G>A
P6307575c1245-521A>G
NCT02553135
University of Miami, USA September 2015
Sponsor: Byron Lam
Phase II single dose, open label, 6 male participants, subretinal injection AAV2-REP1 (AAV2-CAG CHM-WPRE-polyA)		50150656970Arg450MetAG(G)>AT(G)
50253617171c.525_526delAG
50349565456Arg239StopCGA>TGA
50472585857c.525_526delAG
50550757877Thr175del2acAG
50632778079p.Arg267Ter(R267X)
NCT02671539
University of Tubingen, Germany
January 2016
Sponsor: STZ eyetrial
Phase II single dose, open label, 6 male participants, subretinal injection AAV2-REP1 (AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA)		401527571Average change of 3.7 ± 7.5 ETDRS letters(min −4.2, 11.6 max)c.1467delA
402604646c.887C>T; p.R293X
403534764Exon 1-15_del
404596147c.757C>T
405517777c.800delT (pT288Lfs*3)
406516162p.S218X
NCT02341807 *
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia,
University of Pennsylvania,
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
January 2015
Sponsor: Spark Therapeutics
Phase I/II safety study in subjects with CHM gene mutations using an AAV2-REP1 (AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA)		10 adult subjects BCVA unchanged among 2 years of follow-up in 9/10 subjects, one patient lost 17 ETDRS lettersData not available
* Single data for each patient was not available. # These two patients had severe post-injection complications, and they were excluded from the trial. No data are available. Legend: AAV2.REP1 adeno-associated virus Rab escort protein 1 vector; BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study.
Table
Table 3. Main post-injection ocular complications reported for each trial *.
Table 3. Main post-injection ocular complications reported for each trial *.
TrialComplicationNumber of Cases
NCT01461213
University of Oxford,
UK October 2011		Flashing lights7/14
Slight ocular discomfort post-op5/14
Blurred vision4/14
Metamorphopsia3/14
Colours appear “washed out”3/14
Development of cataract5/14
Foreign body sensation2/14
Slightly painful eye1/14
Violet coloured tint to vision1/14
Micropsia1/14
Raised intraocular pressure1/14
Vision feel “duller”1/14
Vitritis1/14
Mild post-op inflammation1/14
Excessive foveal stretch1/14
Air bubble in balanced salt solution (BSS) injection system during surgery1/14
Subconjunctival hemorrhage1/14
Suture-related conjunctival inflammation1/14
NCT02077361
University of Alberta,
Canada April 2015		Subconjunctival hemorrhage6/6
Intraocular pressure (IOP) decrease post-op6/6
Blurred vision6/6
Metamorphopsia6/6
Ocular pain4/6
Vitreous floaters2/6
Anterior chamber reaction2/6
Intra-retinal hyperreflective material 1/6
NCT02553135
University of Miami,
USA September 2015		Conjunctiva hemorrhage, edema6/6
Subretinal fluid5/6
Extrafoveal macular retinal hole in area of nonfunctioning retina2/6
Anterior chamber cells2/6
Vitreous cells1/6
Diplopia1/6
Worsening of pre-existing cataract1/6
NCT02341807
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania,
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
January 2015		Acute (~72 h) localized foveal thinning after injection1/10
* Complications related to NCT02671539 trial are not available.
Table
Table 4. Active and uncompleted studies involving choroideremia treatment with AAV2-REP1.
Table 4. Active and uncompleted studies involving choroideremia treatment with AAV2-REP1.
Clinical Trial (clinicaltrials.gov)RegistrationPhase and Study Type
NCT02407678University of Oxford and Moorfields Eye Hospital, UK
REGENERATE TRIAL
August 2016		Phase II
Randomised, single dose, open label,
30 male participants, subretinal injection
AAV2-REP1
(AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA)
NCT03507686Nightstar Therapeutics, international, multicenter
GEMINI TRIAL
November 2017		Phase II
single dose, open label, two-period,
15 male participants, bilateral subretinal injection
AAV2-REP1
(AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA)
NCT03496012Nightstar Therapeutics, international, multicenter
STAR TRIAL
December 2017		Phase III
control, low and high dose, randomised, open label, outcomes-assessor masked, prospective, parallel controlled group study,
140 male participants, subretinal injection
AAV2-REP1
(AAV2-CAG-CHM-WPRE-polyA)
NCT044834404D Molecular Therapeutics, US
July 2020		Phase I
open-label, dose-escalation study of the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of intravitreal 4D-110
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbouda, A.; Avogaro, F.; Moosajee, M.; Vingolo, E.M. Update on Gene Therapy Clinical Trials for Choroideremia and Potential Experimental Therapies. Medicina 2021, 57, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010064

AMA Style

Abbouda A, Avogaro F, Moosajee M, Vingolo EM. Update on Gene Therapy Clinical Trials for Choroideremia and Potential Experimental Therapies. Medicina. 2021; 57(1):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbouda, Alessandro, Filippo Avogaro, Mariya Moosajee, and Enzo Maria Vingolo. 2021. "Update on Gene Therapy Clinical Trials for Choroideremia and Potential Experimental Therapies" Medicina 57, no. 1: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010064

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop