Next Article in Journal
Pathogenic APC Variants in Latvian Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Lung Transplantation: When it is Feasible
Previous Article in Journal
Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Stroke: Past, Present and Future
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lung Cryobiopsy for the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Series Contribution to a Debated Procedure
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Imaging Review of the Lung Parenchymal Complications in Patients with IPF

Medicina 2019, 55(10), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100613
by Elisa Baratella 1,*, Ilaria Fiorese 1, Cristina Marrocchio 1, Francesco Salton 2 and Maria Assunta Cova 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Medicina 2019, 55(10), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100613
Submission received: 19 June 2019 / Revised: 17 September 2019 / Accepted: 17 September 2019 / Published: 20 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Research)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript provides a thoughtful overview on the lung parenchymal complications in IPF. It mainly focuses on infection, malignancy and acute exacerbation.

Cooments/suggestions for improvement:

There are other causes of complications in IPF e.g. drug induced pulmonary toxicity, congestive heart failure, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, etc. The authors could mention it in general and stated that the most common conditions will be discussed.

Line 25 needs reference.

Line 45 needs reference.

Line 52 The paper will be better if the authors mention more about bacterial, viral infection as it becomes more interest in IPF pathogenesis as well.

Line 57 needs more references and explains why Mycobacterium and Aspergillus species are common. Did the authors search enough references about infection in IPF?

Example study: Yamazaki R, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of IPF patients hospitalized for pulmonary infection:: A Japaneses cohort study. PLos One. 2016.

Line 70-75 mentioned about TB, the author needs to specify the prevalence of mycobacterial infection in IPF, reactivation in IPF patients and codes references.

Line 98 Lung cancer section, need more updated references e.g. Lung cancer in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLos One. 2018, or Characteristics of lung cancer among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung disease- analysis of instutional and population data. Respir Res. 2018.

Line 110 needs reference on survival time you mentioned and recheck if there are other larger or updated cohorts.

Line 125 GGO has been reported or less typical, needs reference.

Line 138 needs reference about the prevalence of thromboembolism in IPF.

Line 153 needs more updated references when mentioned survival time. It should not be from the review articles. The author can search to the original article from the review papers.

Line 166 reference for winter time and AE-IPF.

 

Author Response

We thanks the reviewer 1 for his/her constructive comments. We have followed  all the suggestions for improvement

 

There are other causes of complications in IPF e.g. drug induced pulmonary toxicity, congestive heart failure, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, etc. The authors could mention it in general and stated that the most common conditions will be discussed.

We have mentioned the other causes of complications in IPF

Line 25 needs reference.

ok, done

Line 45 needs reference.

ok, done

Line 52 The paper will be better if the authors mention more about bacterial, viral infection as it becomes more interest in IPF pathogenesis as well.

We have added a small paragraph on this topic 

Line 57 needs more references and explains why Mycobacterium and Aspergillus species are common. Did the authors search enough references about infection in IPF?

Example study: Yamazaki R, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of IPF patients hospitalized for pulmonary infection:: A Japaneses cohort study. PLos One. 2016.

ok, done

Line 70-75 mentioned about TB, the author needs to specify the prevalence of mycobacterial infection in IPF, reactivation in IPF patients and codes references.

We have added a small paragraph and references on the prevalence of mycobacterial infections.  

We did not find specific data on the reactivation rate in patients with IPF 

Line 98 Lung cancer section, need more updated references e.g. Lung cancer in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLos One. 2018, or Characteristics of lung cancer among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung disease- analysis of instutional and population data. Respir Res. 2018.

ok, done

Line 110 needs reference on survival time you mentioned and recheck if there are other larger or updated cohorts.

ok, done

Line 125 GGO has been reported or less typical, needs reference.

We have rewritten the sentence and added references

Line 138 needs reference about the prevalence of thromboembolism in IPF.

ok, done

Line 153 needs more updated references when mentioned survival time. It should not be from the review articles. The author can search to the original article from the review papers.

ok, done

Line 166 reference for winter time and AE-IPF.

ok, done

Reviewer 2 Report

I have only some minor suggestions:

line 64: show no change compareto the previous

line 86: please re-write. Better to split the two concept in two different sentences.

line 155: please write better the sentence

line 167: the criteria to define AE-IPF   … are

line 182: erase with

line 189: I suggest to insert here a sentence recalling Table 1. E.g.: “A list of the parenchymal complications occurring during IPF with their CT scan characteristics is presented in Table 1.

line 240: the Raghu’s reference lacks of the publication year (2004)

line 254: please remove underlining to Reference 21. Authors’ names

Author Response

We thanks the reviewer 2 for his/her constructive comments. We have followed  all the suggestions for improvement

line 64: show no change compareto the previous

ok, done

line 86: please re-write. Better to split the two concept in two different sentences.

we rephrased the sentence

line 155: please write better the sentence

we rephrased the sentence

line 167: the criteria to define AE-IPF   … are

ok, done

line 182: erase with

ok, done

line 189: I suggest to insert here a sentence recalling Table 1. E.g.: “A list of the parenchymal complications occurring during IPF with their CT scan characteristics is presented in Table 1.

we inserted the sentence

line 240: the Raghu’s reference lacks of the publication year (2004)

ok, done

line 254: please remove underlining to Reference 21. Authors’ names

ok, done

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors appropriately address the questions.

Author Response

We kindly thank the reviewer for the precious suggestions.

Back to TopTop