Next Article in Journal
Multiple gastrointestinal metastases of Merkel cell carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Do hemophiliacs have a higher risk for dental caries than the general population?
 
 
Medicina is published by MDPI from Volume 54 Issue 1 (2018). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Lithuanian Medical Association, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, and Vilnius University.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Health-related quality of life measurement in chronic liver disease patients

by
Jolanta Šumskienė
1,
Limas Kupčinskas
1 and
Linas Šumskas
2,3,*
1
Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
3
Institute of Health Research, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2015, 51(4), 201-208; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.06.006
Submission received: 24 April 2014 / Accepted: 13 June 2015 / Published: 1 August 2015

Abstract

Background and objective: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important health indicator in medical outcome research and clinical practice. This issue tends to attract even more attention with the recent improvements of patient survival after liver transplan-tation. This review article aims at providing a deeper insight into practices used for evaluating HRQOL in chronic liver diseases (CLDs) and especially cirrhosis patients during different stages of the disease including liver transplantation.
Materials and methods: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane library was conducted. A search using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) major terms ‘‘liver disease’’ AND ‘‘quality of life’’ was applied for the period from 1966 to 2012.
Results: Our review identified 1483 publications. The searched showed that significant increase of publications (from 362 to 1018) was observed during last decade (period 2003–2012) in comparison with previous. The majority of publications were in English (n = 1179). The literature search and analysis provided information on the most common generic and disease-specific HRQOL instruments, which are used in CLD patients: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Quality of Life questionnaire, the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaire, the Liver Disease Quality of Life questionnaire, and other.
Conclusions: Quality of life instruments are potentially powerful tools for evaluating the functional status, presenting gains of treatment and reflecting patients' ability to return to a normal lifestyle in CLD patients. More attention should be paid by clinicians for integrated use of clinical tests together with HRQOL instruments in liver transplantation for establishing the reference levels of mental, physical, and role-social functioning.
Keywords: Health-related quality of life; Liver cirrhosis; Chronic liver disease; Liver transplantation Health-related quality of life; Liver cirrhosis; Chronic liver disease; Liver transplantation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Šumskienė, J.; Kupčinskas, L.; Šumskas, L. Health-related quality of life measurement in chronic liver disease patients. Medicina 2015, 51, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.06.006

AMA Style

Šumskienė J, Kupčinskas L, Šumskas L. Health-related quality of life measurement in chronic liver disease patients. Medicina. 2015; 51(4):201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.06.006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Šumskienė, Jolanta, Limas Kupčinskas, and Linas Šumskas. 2015. "Health-related quality of life measurement in chronic liver disease patients" Medicina 51, no. 4: 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.06.006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop