Next Article in Journal
Behavioral Problems in Children with Benign Childhood Epilepsy With Centrotemporal Spikes Treated and Untreated with Antiepileptic Drugs
Previous Article in Journal
Shoulder Muscle Isometric Strength and Active Range of Motion in Patients With Frozen Shoulder Syndrome After Manipulation Under Anesthesia
 
 
Medicina is published by MDPI from Volume 54 Issue 1 (2018). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Lithuanian Medical Association, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, and Vilnius University.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Visual Feedback Information on Isometric Contraction of Forearm Flexor Muscles in Men and Women After Ischemic Stroke

by
Tomas Darbutas
1,*,
Vilma Juodžbalienė
1,*,
Albertas Skurvydas
1,*,
Gražina Krutulytė
2,*,
Inesa Rimdeikienė
2,* and
Marius Brazaitis
1,*
1
Faculty of Sports Biomedicine, Lithuanian Sports University
2
Department of Rehabilitation, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Science, Lithuania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2012, 48(12), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina48120092
Submission received: 28 July 2012 / Accepted: 30 December 2012 / Published: 4 January 2013

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of visual feedback information (VFI) on the isometric contraction of the forearm flexor muscles in men and women after an ischemic stroke when doing a physical load at 20% of strength.
Material and Methods
. The study included healthy subjects (n=20) and subjects after ischemic stroke (n=20). The study was conducted in Lithuanian Sports University. The measurements of maximum voluntary strength (MVS) and accurate isometric contraction were performed using an isokinetic dynamometer Biodex System Pro 3.
Results
. The absolute errors of isometric contraction of the right arm muscles at 20% of MVS were similar in all the groups during the attempt with visual feedback information. The smallest absolute errors of the healthy subjects were 1.42±0.35 Nm when the task was performed with visual feedback and the greatest absolute errors were 4.69±0.95 Nm (P<0.01) while performing the task without visual feedback. Meanwhile, the smallest and greatest absolute errors of the subjects after ischemic stroke were 1.32±0.45 Nm and 5.05±0.63 Nm, respectively, while performing the task without visual feedback (P<0.01).
Conclusions
. Maximum voluntary strength was greater in all the groups of men. The absolute errors of isometric contractions of the right and left arm muscles tended to increase in both the men and the women when there was no visual feedback information. The women and the men after an ischemic stroke produced greater absolute errors when performing the task with the right and left arm without visual feedback information than the healthy subjects.
Keywords: ischemic stroke; isometric contraction; accuracy; visual feedback ischemic stroke; isometric contraction; accuracy; visual feedback

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Darbutas, T.; Juodžbalienė, V.; Skurvydas, A.; Krutulytė, G.; Rimdeikienė, I.; Brazaitis, M. Effect of Visual Feedback Information on Isometric Contraction of Forearm Flexor Muscles in Men and Women After Ischemic Stroke. Medicina 2012, 48, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina48120092

AMA Style

Darbutas T, Juodžbalienė V, Skurvydas A, Krutulytė G, Rimdeikienė I, Brazaitis M. Effect of Visual Feedback Information on Isometric Contraction of Forearm Flexor Muscles in Men and Women After Ischemic Stroke. Medicina. 2012; 48(12):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina48120092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Darbutas, Tomas, Vilma Juodžbalienė, Albertas Skurvydas, Gražina Krutulytė, Inesa Rimdeikienė, and Marius Brazaitis. 2012. "Effect of Visual Feedback Information on Isometric Contraction of Forearm Flexor Muscles in Men and Women After Ischemic Stroke" Medicina 48, no. 12: 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina48120092

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop