Next Article in Journal
Targeting RAF Isoforms and Tumor Microenvironments in RAS or BRAF Mutant Colorectal Cancers with SJ-C1044 for Anti-Tumor Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Etiology of Idiopathic Macular Holes in the Light of Estrogen Hormone
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of the Piezo1 Mechanosensitive Channel in Heart Failure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Profiling of Earwax DNA Obtained from Healthy Volunteers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Metagenome from a Steam Vent in Los Azufres Geothermal Field Shows an Abundance of Thermoplasmatales archaea and Bacteria from the Phyla Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota

by
Roberto Marín-Paredes
1,
Hermes H. Bolívar-Torres
2,
Alberto Coronel-Gaytán
1,
Esperanza Martínez-Romero
3 and
Luis E. Servín-Garcidueñas
1,4,*
1
Laboratorio de Microbiómica, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia 58341, Mexico
2
Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja 150003, Colombia
3
Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca 62209, Mexico
4
Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Morelia 58341, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45(7), 5849-5864; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45070370
Submission received: 17 May 2023 / Revised: 9 July 2023 / Accepted: 10 July 2023 / Published: 13 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Current Issues in Molecular Biology)

Abstract

:
Los Azufres National Park is a geothermal field that has a wide number of thermal manifestations; nevertheless, the microbial communities in many of these environments remain unknown. In this study, a metagenome from a sediment sample from Los Azufres National Park was sequenced. In this metagenome, we found that the microbial diversity corresponds to bacteria (Actinomycetota, Pseudomonadota), archaea (Thermoplasmatales and Candidatus Micrarchaeota and Candidatus Parvarchaeota), eukarya (Cyanidiaceae), and viruses (Fussellovirus and Caudoviricetes). The functional annotation showed genes related to the carbon fixation pathway, sulfur metabolism, genes involved in heat and cold shock, and heavy-metal resistance. From the sediment, it was possible to recover two metagenome-assembled genomes from Ferrimicrobium and Cuniculiplasma. Our results showed that there are a large number of microorganisms in Los Azufres that deserve to be studied.

1. Introduction

One characteristic of many geothermal fields is the presence of steam vents, i.e., fumaroles, that consist of permanent emissions of steam and gases from the subsoil due to magmatic activity or groundwater geothermal heating [1]. Consequently, the steam has temperatures above 70 °C, wet conditions, and a concentration of minerals that form deposits as a result of the transport and evaporation of water in the walls of the caves or vents [2]. As a consequence, the walls of the vents have an important amount of minerals that provide conditions for the support of microbial life. Even though limitations of culturing thermophilic and acidophilic microorganisms exist, the use of independent culture approaches such as metagenomics helps us study in greater detail the diversity of microorganisms that inhabit the walls of the vents [3,4].
Mexico has multiple geothermal fields that have been recently explored in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, an orographic formation with high volcanic activity due to the activity of the Cocos and Rivera plates [5]. Los Azufres geothermal field is located in the state of Michoacán, Mexico, in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt region, and it hosts a large number of thermal manifestations;for instance, hot springs, fumaroles, and steam vents that can reach temperatures above 90 °C and pH values below 4 [6]. The high temperatures of these sites attracted the attention of several sectors, especially the energy sector, which built a geothermal energy plant in the geothermal field. As a consequence of the development of geothermal energy generation, the researchers began to study the microorganisms that affect the different pipelines of the geothermal plant and the physicochemical characteristics of the geothermal manifestations [7,8].
The principal chemical elements found in Los Azufres are Sr, Rb, As, Na, Si, Mo, Cu, Mn, Hg, Pb, Fe, Ba, Cd, and F [9,10]. Also, chemical compounds such as sulfates, chlorides, and carbonates [6,10] were found. The major non-condensable gasses present in Los Azufres are carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Also, there were other non-condensable gases such as ammonia (NH3), hydrogen (H2), methane (CH4), helium (He), nitrogen (N2), and argon (Ar). Carbon dioxide represents 70–90% of the total weight of non-condensable gases, while hydrogen sulfide varies between 0.2% and 13% of the total weight of non-condensable gases [11,12].
The microbial diversity of Los Azufres has been studied by electron microscopy or biochemical tests on corroded metals and inside pipes used for geothermal power generation [7,8,13]. Also, the microbial diversity of samples from a human-impacted site that is used as a “natural spa” for tourists was analyzed. This work was carried out by analyzing sequences of 16S rRNA genes from bacteria that were found to be related to Acidithiobacillus and other Proteobacteria, Desulfurella (Deltaproteobacteria/now Campylobacterota), Firmicutes (Bacillota), Acidobacteria (Acidobacterota), Thermotogae (Thermotogota), and Cyanobacteria (Cyanobacteriota). In a previous work, the presence of archaea was never reported [10].
Previously, Servín-Garcidueñas and colleagues isolated a bacterium related to Acidocella from an acid lake (pH 2.3) in Los Azufres [14]. Additionally, the Servín-Garcidueñas group has focused on performing metagenomic analysis to determine the microbial diversity in different areas of Los Azufres. First of all, a water sample from an acid solfatara (pH 3.6 and 65 °C) was sequenced, and there were archaea related to the order Sulfolobales. This archaeon was named “Candidatus Aramenus sulfurataquae AZ1” [15]. Also, two genomes of undescribed viruses were found belonging to the genera Rudivirus and Fusellovirus [16,17]. Subsequently, another metagenome from a yellow sediment sample around a hot spring (pH 2.8, 88.5 °C) was sequenced. In this metagenome archaea related to Acidianus and Sulfolobus were found. In addition, another genome of Ca. Aramenus [18] was obtained. In the last three years, two metagenomes have been sequenced from green sediments around a hot spring and around a fumarole. At the moment, only one genome of Acidibrevibacterium has been recovered from the green sediments around a fumarole [19].
In 2013, a metagenome was sequenced from green sediments around a steam vent, and from this metagenome, the genome of a Micrarchaeota archaea was recovered, and phylogenetic analyses of Thermoplasmatales archaea were performed [20]. The aims of this study were the assembly of genomes from metagenomic data and their analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, DNA Extraction and Sequencing

The green sediment sample was collected around a steam vent at the geothermal field of Los Azufres, Mexico, in April 2013 (Figure 1) (19.78170609819753 N, −100.65805210414699 W). The sediment sample (Figure 1) had a temperature of 67 °C and a pH of 3. DNA was isolated using the UltraClean Mega (Prep) Soil DNA Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). The sequencing was performed on an Illumina Miseq 2 × 300 bp at Macrogen, Inc., Seul, Republic of Korea.

2.2. Metagenome Assembly and Annotation

The reads were analyzed using FastQC v.0.11.8 [21] and filtered for quality (scores of Q ≥ 30) using Trim Galore v.0.6.7 [22]. Reads were assembled de novo with SPAdes v.3.12.0 [23] using k-mer values of 21,33,55,77,99,127. The metagenome was annotated using the server Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes (IMG/M) [24,25]. Filtered reads were used to calculate the microbial diversity of the metagenome through the software kaiju v.1.9.2 [26] with the database “nr” using translated proteins.
MetaviralSPAdes v3.15.5 [27] was used to search the metagenome for viral sequences with k-mer values of 11, 17, 23, 29, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 65, 71, 77, 83, 89, 95, 101, 107, 113, 119, and 127. The resulting viral sequences were verified using viralVerify v. 1.1 [27] and checked using viralComplete v. 1.0 [27] with default settings. Subsequently, these viral genomes were annotated using Prokka v.1.14.6 [28], and the resulting viral protein sequences were searched by blast to corroborate that the viral genome belonged to the virus.

2.3. Binning, Taxonomic Classification, and MAG’s Annotation

Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAG’s) were obtained through three different programs, such as Metabat v2.12.1 [29], Maxbin v.2.2 [30], and Concoct v.1.1.0 [31]. The results of each method were combined using DasTool v.1.1.2 [32]. The quality and taxonomic classification of each bin were checked using CheckM v.1.0.13 [33,34,35] and CAT v.5.2.3 [36], respectively. Prokka (v.1.14.6) was used to annotate each MAG [28]. Then, using COGclassifier v1.0.5, the protein sequences of each MAG were categorized into Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) categories [37]. The genomic annotation of high-quality MAGs was explored in search of genes for resistance or genes involved in carbon fixation pathway, nitrogen, and sulfur metabolism. A MAG related to Cuniculiplasma was recovered through mapping. Bowtie2 v.2.3.4.3 (mode: very sensitive) [38] was used to map filtered reads against the genome of Cuniculiplasma divulgatum PM4 (LT719092.1). The mapped reads were assembled using SPAdes v.3.12.0 [23] using k-mer values of 21, 33, 55, 77, 99, and 127.

2.4. Phylogenomic Analysis of Thermoplasmatales archaea and Ferrimicrobium sp. AZ2-2013

Two phylogenomic trees were constructed using MAGs that have contamination less than 6.0 and completeness greater than 80%. Open reading frames (ORFs) from each bin were searched using Prokka v.1.14.6 [28]. Model organisms and type strains of Thermoplasmatales and Actinobacteria were selected from the NCBI database. The construction of the phylogenomic tree was carried out by PhyloPhlan v.0.99 [39].

2.5. MAG Annotation and Comparative Genomics Analysis

The MAG of Cuniculiplasma was annotated using the server Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes (IMG/M) [24,25]. The MAG related to Cuniculiplasma was compared to Cuniculiplasma divulgatum PM4 and Cuniculiplasma divulgatum S5 genomes through average nucleotide identity (ANI), average amino acid identity (AAI), and DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) values. The values of ANI, AAI, and DDH were calculated using the ANI/AAI-Matrix calculator from the Konstantinidis Laboratory (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/g-matrix/index) (accessed on 10 September 2022) [40] and the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) (https://www.dsmz.de/services/online-tools/genome-to-genome-distance-calculator-ggdc) (accessed on 10 September 2022 ) [41]. In addition, the MAG related to Ferrimicrobium was compared to Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum DSM19497 strain T23 (GCF_000949255.1), as previously described.

3. Results

3.1. Metagenome Assembly and Annotation

The metagenome has 46,728,050 reads with a length between 35 and 301 bp and an average quality per read of 37 (Phred Quality Score). After the quality trimming 43,034,606 with a length between 30 and 266 and an average quality per read of 37 (Phred Quality Score) remained. The metagenome has 97,177 contigs (N50, 6617) containing 144,161,343 bp and a GC content of 55.52%. The metagenome annotation found 212,400 protein coding genes. These protein coding genes were classified using Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) (Table 1). Only 37.58% of the total reads (8,087,196) were classified by Kaiju, and 62.42% of the total reads remained unclassified. According to the analysis of microbial diversity (Figure 2), the most prevalent phylum was Ca. Thermoplasmatota, which is followed by the bacterial phyla Actinomycetota, Pseudomonadota, and Cyanobacteriota.

3.2. Metagenome Genes Involved in Metabolic Pathway and Resistances

Genes involved in the carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes were found. These genes correspond to the pathways of the reductive citric acid cycle, reductive acetyl-coenzyme A, dicarboxylate/hydroxybutyrate cycle, 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle, and hydroxypropionate/hydroxybutyrate cycle. However, some genes involved in the 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle and hydroxypropionate/hydroxybutyrate cycle were not found. The enzymes sulfur oxygenase/reductase (SOR) and sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) were found. All the genes involved in dissimilatory/assimilatory nitrate reduction and assimilatory sulfate reduction were found. In addition, genes related to heat shock (HSPA1s, HSPA4, htpX, hspR) and cold shock (cspA) were observed. Finally, multiple genes involved in heavy metal resistance were found, such as arsenic (arsenate reductase arsC, arsenite transporters arsA and arsB), chromium (chromate transporter chrA, chromate reductase NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) chrR), mercury (mercuric reductase merA, periplasmic mercuric ion binding protein merP, mercuric ion transport protein merC) nickel (peptide/nickel transport system ATP-binding protein ddpD and ddpF, nickel superoxide dismutase sodN, peptide/nickel transport system permease protein, hydrogenase nickel incorporation protein HypA/HybF and HypB, nickel-responsive regulator nikR), and multi-metal (cobalt/nickel transport system ATP-binding protein cbiO, nickel/cobalt transporter (NiCoT) family protein hoxN, nixA, nickel/cobalt transporter (NicO) family protein rcnA, cobalt/nickel-transporting P-type ATPase D ctpD, cobalt–zinc–cadmium efflux system protein czcD, zitB, zinc and cadmium transporter zipB, outer membrane protein, heavy metal efflux system czcC, heavy metal efflux system protein czcA, heavy metal efflux system czcB).

3.3. Metagenome Viral Sequences

Two viral genomes were assembled. The first viral genome (Vaz-01) belonged to Fusellovirus genus. Vaz-01 had a size of 14,046 bp, a GC content of 34.78%, and an identity value of 65.30% against Sulfolobus virus 2 (NC_005265.1.). The genome annotation of Vaz-01 revealed 21 protein coding sequences. The second viral genomes (Vaz-02) had a size of 33,639 and a GC content of 61.59%. Vaz-02 had an identity value of 69.22% against Caudoviricetes sp. isolate ctmKK23 (BK042626.1). Vaz-02 annotation showed 39 protein coding sequences.

3.4. Binning, Taxonomic Classification, and MAGs Annotation

Thirty-two bins were obtained from the sediment metagenome, of which fifteen belonged to Archaea, thirteen belonged to Bacteria, and four belonged to Eukarya. Thirteen archaea were identified from the order Thermoplasmatales (“alphabet plasmas” Cuniculiplasma and Ferroplasma) and two archaea from the phylum Candidatus Micrarchaeota (Microcaldota) and Nanoarchaeota (Parvarchaeota order). Ten bacteria were identified related to Actinomycetota, one from the order Acidimricrobiales (Ferrimicrobium genus), another from the order Corynebacteriales (Mycobacterium genus), and eight unidentified. Furthermore, we identified three bacteria from the phylum Pseudomonadota, one from the order Acidithiobacillales (Acidithiobacillus caldus) and two unidentified. Finally, we recovered four bins of Eukarya belonging to the family Cyanidiaceae. The statistical information for each bin is shown in Table 2. The MAGs functional diversity analysis (Figure 3) showed that the COGs categories with a great number of genes were related to translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis. The analysis also revealed that the MAGs related to bacteria had a great number of genes involved in energy production and conversion, carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and lipid metabolism, whereas the MAGs related to archaea only had a great number of genes related to amino acid metabolism.
Only high-quality MAGs from bacteria had genes involved in the carbon fixation pathway; BinB003 had genes related to the reductive citrate cycle. BinB002, BinB006, BinB009, and BinB012 lacked the gene for fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase II involved in the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle (RuBisCo). Despite the lack of this gene, they had all the genes involved in this cycle.
The enzyme sulfate sulfur oxygenase/reductase was present only in BinA002 and BinA010. All the genes involved in the assimilatory sulfate reduction pathway were present in BinB003 and BinB011. Other high-quality bacterial MAGs (BinB006, BinB009, and BinB012) did not contain the gene sulfite reductase (SiR), which is essential for the assimilatory sulfate reduction pathway. The entire metabolic pathway for the assimilatory nitrate reduction pathway was not present in any high-quality MAGs. The ferredoxin–nitrite reductase gene (NirA) was the only gene present.
Genes for heavy metal resistance were found. High-quality MAGs have the genes arsenate reductase (arsC) and arsenite transporters (arsA and arsB), but BinA010 and BinB004 lacked the genes for arsenic resistance. Archaeal MAGs and BinB004 lacked genes involved in mercuric resistance. Others had one of the genes for mercuric reductase (merA) and mercuric ion transport protein (merC). BinB004, BinB009, BinB011, and BinB012 had genes related to the cobalt–zinc–cadmium efflux system protein (czcD). Genes related to resistance to nickel and chromium were not present in any high-quality MAGs.
There were numerous genes for heat shock proteins (Hsp20, Hsp33, and Hsp90) in high-quality MAGs BinB002, BinB003, BinB004, BinB011, and BinB012. Finally, only BinA010 did not have the machinery for repairing heat-induced protein damage that involves the chaperones DnaJ, DnaK, and the protein GrpE.

3.5. Phylogenomic Analysis of Thermoplasmatales archaea and Ferrimicrobium sp. AZ2-2013

The phylogenomic analysis of Thermoplasmatales archaea found in Los Azufres showed a wide diversity of these organisms (Figure 4). According to the phylogenomic analysis of Actinomycetota (Figure 5), the close relationship between BinB008 and Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum DSM19497, BinB003 and Mycobacterium marinum MMA1, and BinB006 and Miltoncostaea marina SCSIO 60955 was revealed. We decided to study BinB008 more deeply because it is one of the highest quality (completeness of 96.58% and a contamination of 1.38%). We propose here the next name ‘Ferrimicrobium sp. AZ2-2013′ to account for it.

3.6. MAG Annotation and Comparative Genomic Analysis

The MAG related to Ferrimicrobium sp. (Table 2) had 60 contigs containing 2,544,086 bp (N50 value of 60560), and it had a coverage of 6.49X and G + C content of 57.97. This MAG was called Ferrimicrobium sp. AZ2-2013. This MAG had values of 77.07% (ANI), 76.12% (AAI), and 19.10% (DDH) against the genome of Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum DSM19497 (GCF_000745905.1) and values of 77.16% (ANI), 76.06% (AAI), and 19.60% (DDH) against Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum DSM19497 strain T23 (GCF_000949255.1); the size of this genome was smaller compared to F. acidiphilum (3.08 Mb) [37]. This was the first genome of the genus Ferrimicrobium reported in Los Azufres. The annotation of this genome revealed many similarities between this genome and Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum DSM19497. There are genes related to the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle (RuBisCo), carboxysome, and tricarboxylic acid cycle and genes involved in iron and sulfur oxidation. Also, there are genes related to stress responses (heat shock and acid stress) and heavy metal resistance, especially arsenic and mercury.
The MAG related to Cuniculiplasma divulgatum had 277 contigs containing 1,858,996 bp (N50 value of 18,461), and the MAG had a coverage of 136.57X, G + C content of 37.28, and a contamination of 2.82%. This MAG was called ‘Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013′. This is the first genome related to Thermoplasmatales to be recovered from Los Azufres, Mexico. Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013 had values of 99.12% (ANI), 99.31% (AAI), and 91.50% (DDH) against the genome of Cuniculiplasma divulgatum PM4 (LT719092.1) and values of 98.66% (ANI), 97.88% (AAI), and 86.50% (DDH) against Cuniculiplasma divulgatum S5 (LT671858.1). There are genes involved in the citric acid cycle, but the enzymes 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase and fumarase were absent. In the synthesis of amino acids, Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013 lacked the genes for the synthesis of histidine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, and valine. Furthermore, there is a gene related to the heat shock protein HtpX. Notably, there are no genes related to metal resistance.

4. Discussion

The microbial diversity found in sediments from Los Azufres corresponds principally to phyla Ca. Thermoplasmatota, Actinomycetota, Pseudomonadota, and Cyanobacteriota. The most prevalent microorganisms in the sediment sample from the Los Azufres geothermal area are Thermoplasmatales archaea. Only 0.060% (12, 993) (Supplementary Table S1) of the total reads from this metagenome belonged to Sulfolobales. This low abundance may be due to the type of sample. Sulfolobales archea were found in water samples from an acid solfatara [15] and in a yellow sediment sample (sulfur crystal) [18]. Thirteen MAGs associated with Thermoplasmatales were discovered by us, and phylogenomic research reveals that these archaea are very diverse. Thermoplasmatales archaea are present in acid mine drainage sites all over the world, including Parys Mountain, United Kingdom [42,43], Los Rueldos, Spain [44], and Richmond mine at Iron Mountain, United States [45,46]. Additionally, Thermoplasmatales were discovered in water samples from the Kamchatka Peninsula and Kunashir Island in Russia [47] as well as the Tenorio Volcano National Park in Costa Rica [48]. However, the temperature in Parys Mountain, UK, is between 8 and 18 °C. Thermoplasmatales were discovered to be the most prevalent microorganisms (62%) in sediment samples from Parys Mountain, UK, according to Korzhenkov et al., 2019 [42], despite the low temperatures. To further understand why Thermoplasmatales archaea are present in low temperatures, a comparative genomic analysis between the genomes discovered in Parys Mountain, UK, and genomes discovered in thermal environments is essential.
It is important to note that bacteria from the phyla Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota were also discovered in the Parys Mountain in the UK [42,43] and Tenorio Volcano National Park in Costa Rica [48]. Additionally, algae from the Chlorophyceae family were present in Parys Mountain [43], whereas acidophilic algae from the Cyanidiaceae family were found in the Los Azufres geothermal area.
Finally, we obtained viral sequences that are relevant to understanding the interactions between microbial communities. Viruses from the class Caudoviricetes have the capacity to infect both archaea and bacteria [49]. The same study mentioned that members of this class can infect cells from the order Thermoplamatales. However, many of the viruses in this taxonomic group remain unknown and relate to marine and anoxic environments. In the case of Fusellovirus, previous studies in Los Azufres reported the presence of viral sequences related to this group that infect archaea, and it is believed that this group has a key role in the gene exchange between archaea populations. As well, the presence of these viruses is common in geothermal environments [50].
According to the functional analysis, we detected that the microbial community in Los Azufres has the ability to obtain energy and resources from several sources, and bacteria have the possibility to use carbon through carbon fixation. In addition, the microbial community is capable of assimilating nitrates and sulfates. Similar adaptations have been detected in other steam vents in Mexico [3] and hot springs located in Costa Rica [48] and Malaysia [51]. Our results showed that bacteria are possible candidates for sulfate assimilation processes. Our analysis offered a vision of the versatility of the microbial community to obtain energy from several sources. The presence of genes related to heat and cold shock shows the flexibility of the microbial community to face changes in temperature. Consequently, the microbial community has been exposed to abrupt temperature changes. Furthermore, the weather in Los Azufres varies each season, reaching low temperatures. For this reason, the microbial community has developed not only strategies to live in high temperatures but also adaptations to survive in low temperatures during the winter.
The presence of metal resistance genes is related to the presence of those metals in the environment that the microbial community inhabits; gene prediction in steam vents located in Paricutin volcano showed the presence of similar adaptations to metal resistance [3]. The heavy metals in steam vents and hot springs in Los Azufres may be due to the constant geological activity therein. For this reason, the microbial community has developed adaptations to survive and manage the metal high concentration.
In this study, we obtained the first genome related to the genus Ferrimicrobium from Mexico. The bacterial genus Ferrimicrobium was reported for the first time in the United Kingdom in a sample obtained from an abandoned sulfur mine [52,53]. There are reports of this genus in an acid river in Argentina [54], and acid mine drainage in Finland [55], Turkey [56], and Russia [57]. According to Johnson et al. [52] and Li et al. [58], Ferrimicrobium is able to oxidize ferrous iron and is typical of acidic environments, and it probably plays a role in the sulfur and iron biogeochemical cycle in Los Azufres due to its capacity to oxidize iron and sulfur. Furthermore, Ferrimicrobium sp. AZ2-2013 has genes related to metal resistance for arsenic and mercuric; heavy metal resistance was reported previously by Johnson et al. [52], but not for these metals.
In addition, one genome of archaea related to Cuniculiplasma divulgatum was obtained here. Cuniculiplasma divulgatum was found for the first time in Spain and the United Kingdom [59]. Golyshina et al. [60] found that Cuniculiplasma has interactions with Ca. Micrarchaeota. Also, Golyshina et al. [61] found the presence of acidophilic algae and proposed that these algae are primary producers in these environments and Cuniculiplasma, being heterotrophic, could take advantage of the organic compounds produced by algae. In this metagenome, we found the presence of an acidophilic algae belonging to the genera Cyanidiaceae and also an archaeon related to Ca. Micrarchaeota, and it is possible that this archaeon had interactions with Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013. Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013 had high values of ANI, AAI, and DDH against Cuniculiplasma divulgatum PM4, indicating that Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013 belongs to the species Cuniculiplasma divulgatum. Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013 lacks the same genes related to the citric acid cycle and synthesis of amino acids as Cuniculiplasma divulgatum PM4.
Our study expanded the knowledge of the microbial community in Los Azufres geothermal field and showed a wide variety of archaea and bacteria that were successfully assembled in MAGs. We consider it necessary to study viruses found in Los Azufres to understand their role in the ecosystem.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb45070370/s1, Table S1: Microbial diversity of sediment sample at the taxonomic level of order.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.-P. and H.H.B.-T.; methodology, R.M.-P., H.H.B.-T., A.C.-G. and L.E.S.-G.; software, R.M.-P., H.H.B.-T. and A.C.-G.; validation, R.M.-P. and H.H.B.-T.; formal analysis, R.M.-P., H.H.B.-T. and A.C.-G.; investigation, R.M.-P. and H.H.B.-T.; resources, L.E.S.-G.; data curation, R.M.-P. and H.H.B.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.-P. and H.H.B.-T.; writing—review and editing, R.M.-P., H.H.B.-T., A.C.-G., E.M.-R. and L.E.S.-G.; visualization, R.M.-P., H.H.B.-T., A.C.-G., E.M.-R. and L.E.S.-G.; supervision, R.M.-P., H.H.B.-T., A.C.-G., E.M.-R. and L.E.S.-G.; project administration, L.E.S.-G.; funding acquisition, L.E.S.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants to L.E.S.-G. from PAPIIT-UNAM (grants IA210617 and IA208019).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequencing data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRR18192416. The MAGs for “Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013” and “Ferrimicrobium sp. AZ2-2013” are available in GenBank under accession numbers JALBYY000000000 and JALCZJ000000000, respectively. The metagenomes and “Cuniculiplasma sp. AZ1-2013” functional annotations are available from the JGI Genome Portal under accession numbers 264294 and 212543, respectively.

Acknowledgments

M.-P.R is a student from the Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), supported by a fellowship from CONACyT-México. This work is a prerequisite for R.M.-P. to obtain a degree in biological sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Benson, C.A.; Bizzoco, R.W.; Lipson, D.A.; Kelley, S.T. Microbial Diversity in Nonsulfur, Sulfur and Iron Geothermal Steam Vents. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 76, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Richard, L.; Bizzoco, W.; Kelley, S.T. Volcanic Steam Vents: Life at Low PH and High Temperature. In Extremophiles as Astrobiological Models; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–20. ISBN 9781119593096. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brito, E.M.S.; Romero-Núñez, V.M.; Caretta, C.A.; Bertin, P.; Valerdi-Negreros, J.C.; Guyoneaud, R.; Goñi-Urriza, M. The Bacterial Diversity on Steam Vents from Paricutín and Sapichu Volcanoes. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bizzoco, R.L.W.; Kelley, S.T. Geothermal Steam Vents of Hawai’i. Model Ecosyst. Extrem. Environ. 2019, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ferrari, L. Tectónica y Volcanismo En El Cinturón Volcánico Trans-Mexicano. 2023. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260383955 (accessed on 1 May 2023).
  6. Lopez, M.R.T.; Arriaga, M.C.S. Geochemical Evolution of the Los Azufres, Mexico, Geothermal Reservoir. Part I: Water and Salts. In Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Tohoku, Japan, 28 May–10 June 2000; pp. 2257–2262. [Google Scholar]
  7. Navarrette-Bedolla, M.; Ballesteros-Almanza, L.; Sanchez-Yañez, J.; valdez salas, B.; Hernandez-Duque, G. Biocorrosion in a Geothermal Power Plant. Mater. Perform. 1999, 38, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alfaro-Cuevas-Villanueva, R.; Cortes-Martinez, R.; García-Díaz, J.J.; Galvan-Martinez, R.; Torres-Sanchez, R. Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion of Steels by Thermophilic and Mesophilic Bacteria. Mater. Corros. 2006, 57, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Birkle, P.; Merkel, B. Environmental Impact by Spill of Geothermal Fluids at the Geothermal Field of Los Azufres, Michoacán, Mexico. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2000, 124, 371–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brito, E.M.S.; Villegas-Negrete, N.; Sotelo-González, I.A.; Caretta, C.A.; Goñi-Urriza, M.; Gassie, C.; Hakil, F.; Colin, Y.; Duran, R.; Gutiérrez-Corona, F.; et al. Microbial Diversity in Los Azufres Geothermal Field (Michoacán, Mexico) and Isolation of Representative Sulfate and Sulfur Reducers. Extremophiles 2014, 18, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Torres-Alvarado, I.S. Chemical Equilibrium in Hydrothermal Systems: The Case of Los Azufres Geothermal Field, Mexico. Int. Geol. Rev. 2002, 44, 639–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lopez, M.R.T.; Arriaga, M.C.S.; Cesar, M. Geochemical Evolution of the Los Azufres, Mexico, Geothermal Reservoir. Part II: Non-Condensible Gases. In Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Tohoku, Japan, 28 May–10 June 2000; pp. 2227–2233. [Google Scholar]
  13. Valdez Salas, B.; Schorr Wiener, M.; Rioseco de la Peña, L.; Navarrete Bedolla, M. Deterioration of Materials in Geothermal Fields in Mexico. Mater. Corros. 2000, 51, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Garrett, R.A.; Amils, R.; Martínez-Romero, E. Genome Sequence of the Acidophilic Bacterium Acidocella Sp. Strain MX-AZ02. Genome Announc. 2013, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Martínez-Romero, E. Draft Genome Sequence of the Sulfolobales Archaeon AZ1, Obtained through Metagenomic Analysis of a Mexican Hot Spring. Genome Announc. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Peng, X.; Garrett, R.A.; Martínez-Romero, E. Genome Sequence of a Novel Archaeal Rudivirus Recovered from a Mexican Hot Spring. Genome Announc. 2013, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Peng, X.; Garrett, R.A.; Martínez-Romero, E. Genome Sequence of a Novel Archaeal Fusellovirus Assembled from the Metagenome of a Mexican Hot Spring. Genome Announc. 2013, 1, e0016413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Marín-Paredes, R.; Tapia-Torres, Y.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Quesada, M.; Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E. Metagenome Assembly and Metagenome-Assembled Genome of “Candidatus Aramenus Sulfurataquae” from Thermal Sediments from the Los Azufres Volcanic Complex. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bolivar-Torres, H.H.; Marín-Paredes, R.; Ramos-Madrigal, C.; Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E. Metagenome-Assembled Genome of Acidibrevibacterium Fodinaquatile FLA01 from Fumarole Sediments from the Los Azufres Geothermal Field. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.-X.; Méndez-García, C.; Dombrowski, N.; Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Eloe-Fadrosh, E.A.; Fang, B.-Z.; Luo, Z.-H.; Tan, S.; Zhi, X.-Y.; Hua, Z.-S.; et al. Metabolic Versatility of Small Archaea Micrarchaeota and Parvarchaeota. ISME J. 2018, 12, 756–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Anders, S. Babraham Bioinformatics—FastQC A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 1 August 2022).
  22. Krueger, F. Trim Galore: A Wrapper Tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to Consistently Apply Quality and Adapter Trimming to FastQ Files, with Some Extra Functionality for MspI-Digested RRBS-Type. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ (accessed on 1 August 2022).
  23. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Chen, I.M.A.; Chu, K.; Palaniappan, K.; Ratner, A.; Huang, J.; Huntemann, M.; Hajek, P.; Ritter, S.; Varghese, N.; Seshadri, R.; et al. The IMG/M Data Management and Analysis System v.6.0: New Tools and Advanced Capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D751–D763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mukherjee, S.; Stamatis, D.; Li, C.T.; Ovchinnikova, G.; Bertsch, J.; Sundaramurthi, J.C.; Kandimalla, M.; Nicolopoulos, P.A.; Favognano, A.; Chen, I.-M.A.; et al. Twenty-Five Years of Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): Data Updates and New Features in v.9. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D957–D963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Menzel, P.; Ng, K.L.; Krogh, A. Fast and Sensitive Taxonomic Classification for Metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Antipov, D.; Raiko, M.; Lapidus, A.; Pevzner, P.A. Metaviral SPAdes: Assembly of Viruses from Metagenomic Data. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 4126–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Kang, D.D.; Li, F.; Kirton, E.; Thomas, A.; Egan, R.; An, H.; Wang, Z. MetaBAT 2: An Adaptive Binning Algorithm for Robust and Efficient Genome Reconstruction from Metagenome Assemblies. PeerJ 2019, 2019, e7359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wu, Y.W.; Simmons, B.A.; Singer, S.W. MaxBin 2.0: An Automated Binning Algorithm to Recover Genomes from Multiple Metagenomic Datasets. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alneberg, J.; Bjarnason, B.S.; de Bruijn, I.; Schirmer, M.; Quick, J.; Ijaz, U.Z.; Lahti, L.; Loman, N.J.; Andersson, A.F.; Quince, C. Binning Metagenomic Contigs by Coverage and Composition. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 1144–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sieber, C.M.K.; Probst, A.J.; Sharrar, A.; Thomas, B.C.; Hess, M.; Tringe, S.G.; Banfield, J.F. Recovery of Genomes from Metagenomes via a Dereplication, Aggregation and Scoring Strategy. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the Quality of Microbial Genomes Recovered from Isolates, Single Cells, and Metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Matsen, F.A.; Kodner, R.B.; Armbrust, E.V. Pplacer: Linear Time Maximum-Likelihood and Bayesian Phylogenetic Placement of Sequences onto a Fixed Reference Tree. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hyatt, D.; Chen, G.-L.; LoCascio, P.F.; Land, M.L.; Larimer, F.W.; Hauser, L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic Gene Recognition and Translation Initiation Site Identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. von Meijenfeldt, F.A.B.; Arkhipova, K.; Cambuy, D.D.; Coutinho, F.H.; Dutilh, B.E. Robust Taxonomic Classification of Uncharted Microbial Sequences and Bins with CAT and BAT. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shimoyama, Y. COGclassifier: A Tool for Classifying Prokaryote Protein Sequences into COG Functional Category. GitHub 2022. Available online: https://github.com/moshi4/COGclassifier (accessed on 1 June 2023).
  38. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast Gapped-Read Alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Segata, N.; Börnigen, D.; Morgan, X.C.; Huttenhower, C. PhyloPhlAn Is a New Method for Improved Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Placement of Microbes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T. The Enveomics Collection: A Toolbox for Specialized Analyses of Microbial Genomes and Metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016. [Google Scholar]
  41. Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Standard Operating Procedure for Calculating Genome-to-Genome Distances Based on High-Scoring Segment Pairs. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2010, 2, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Korzhenkov, A.A.; Toshchakov, S.V.; Bargiela, R.; Gibbard, H.; Ferrer, M.; Teplyuk, A.V.; Jones, D.L.; Kublanov, I.V.; Golyshin, P.N.; Golyshina, O.V. Archaea Dominate the Microbial Community in an Ecosystem with Low-to-Moderate Temperature and Extreme Acidity. Microbiome 2019, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Distaso, M.A.; Bargiela, R.; Johnson, B.; McIntosh, O.A.; Williams, G.B.; Jones, D.L.; Golyshin, P.N.; Golyshina, O.V. Microbial Diversity of a Disused Copper Mine Site (Parys Mountain, UK), Dominated by Intensive Eukaryotic Filamentous Growth. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mesa, V.; Gallego, J.L.R.; González-Gil, R.; Lauga, B.; Sánchez, J.; Méndez-García, C.; Peláez, A.I. Bacterial, Archaeal, and Eukaryotic Diversity across Distinct Microhabitats in an Acid Mine Drainage. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bond, P.L.; Smriga, S.P.; Banfield, J.F. Phylogeny of Microorganisms Populating a Thick, Subaerial, Predominantly Lithotrophic Biofilm at an Extreme Acid Mine Drainage Site. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3842–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Dick, G.J.; Andersson, A.F.; Baker, B.J.; Simmons, S.L.; Thomas, B.C.; Yelton, A.P.; Banfield, J.F. Community-Wide Analysis of Microbial Genome Sequence Signatures. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Golyshina, O.V.; Bargiela, R.; Toshchakov, S.V.; Chernyh, N.A.; Ramayah, S.; Korzhenkov, A.A.; Kublanov, I.V.; Golyshin, P.N. Diversity of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in Two Distinct Types of Acidic Environments and Their Associations with Thermoplasmatales. Genes 2019, 10, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Arce-Rodríguez, A.; Puente-Sánchez, F.; Avendaño, R.; Martínez-Cruz, M.; de Moor, J.M.; Pieper, D.H.; Chavarría, M. Thermoplasmatales and Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria Dominate the Microbial Community at the Surface Water of a CO2-Rich Hydrothermal Spring Located in Tenorio Volcano National Park, Costa Rica. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, Y.; Demina, T.A.; Roux, S.; Aiewsakun, P.; Kazlauskas, D.; Simmonds, P.; Prangishvili, D.; Oksanen, H.M.; Krupovic, M. Diversity, Taxonomy, and Evolution of Archaeal Viruses of the Class Caudoviricetes. PLoS Biol. 2021, 19, e3001442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Aulitto, M.; Martinez-Alvarez, L.; Fusco, S.; She, Q.; Bartolucci, S.; Peng, X.; Contursi, P. Genomics, Transcriptomics, and Proteomics of SSV1 and Related Fusellovirus: A Minireview. Viruses 2022, 14, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chan, C.S.; Chan, K.G.; Tay, Y.L.; Chua, Y.H.; Goh, K.M. Diversity of Thermophiles in a Malaysian Hot Spring Determined Using 16S RRNA and Shotgun Metagenome Sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Johnson, D.B.; Bacelar-Nicolau, P.; Okibe, N.; Thomas, A.; Hallberg, K.B. Ferrimicrobium Acidiphilum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. and Ferrithrix Thermotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov.: Heterotrophic, Iron-Oxidizing, Extremely Acidophilic Actinobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Eisen, S.; Poehlein, A.; Johnson, D.B.; Daniel, R.; Schlömann, M.; Mühling, M. Genome Sequence of the Acidophilic Iron Oxidizer Ferrimicrobium Acidiphilum Strain T23T. Genome Announc. 2016, 3, e00383-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Urbieta, M.S.; González Toril, E.; Aguilera, A.; Giaveno, M.A.; Donati, E. First Prokaryotic Biodiversity Assessment Using Molecular Techniques of an Acidic River in Neuquén, Argentina. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 64, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kay, C.M.; Haanela, A.; Johnson, D.B. Microorganisms in Subterranean Acidic Waters within Europe’s Deepest Metal Mine. Res. Microbiol. 2014, 165, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aytar, P.; Kay, C.M.; Mutlu, M.B.; Çabuk, A.; Johnson, D.B. Diversity of Acidophilic Prokaryotes at Two Acid Mine Drainage Sites in Turkey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 5995–6003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kadnikov, V.V.; Gruzdev, E.V.; Ivasenko, D.A.; Beletsky, A.V.; Mardanov, A.V.; Danilova, E.V.; Karnachuk, O.V.; Ravin, N.V. Selection of a Microbial Community in the Course of Formation of Acid Mine Drainage. Microbiology 2019, 88, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, J.; Sun, W.; Wang, S.; Sun, Z.; Lin, S.; Peng, X. Bacteria Diversity, Distribution and Insight into Their Role in S and Fe Biogeochemical Cycling during Black Shale Weathering. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 3533–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Golyshina, O.V.; Lünsdorf, H.; Kublanov, I.V.; Goldenstein, N.I.; Hinrichs, K.U.; Golyshin, P.N. The Novel Extremely Acidophilic, Cell-Wall-Deficient Archaeon Cuniculiplasma Divulgatum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. Represents a New Family, Cuniculiplasmataceae Fam. Nov., of the Order Thermoplasmatales. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Golyshina, O.V.; Bargiela, R.; Golyshin, P.N. Cuniculiplasmataceae, Their Ecogenomic and Metabolic Patterns, and Interactions with ‘ARMAN’. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Golyshina, O.V.; Kublanov, I.V.; Tran, H.; Korzhenkov, A.A.; Lünsdorf, H.; Nechitaylo, T.Y.; Gavrilov, S.N.; Toshchakov, S.V.; Golyshin, P.N. Biology of Archaea from a Novel Family Cuniculiplasmataceae (Thermoplasmata) Ubiquitous in Hyperacidic Environments. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographic location of collection site. (A) Geographic location of collection site (19.78170609819753 N, −100.65805210414699 W). The Los Azufres geothermal field’s zone is shown in the image. Google-Earth-generated image. (B) Sample of sediment taken from the Los Azufres geothermal field. Inside the rectangle, a sample of the green sediment was obtained.
Figure 1. Geographic location of collection site. (A) Geographic location of collection site (19.78170609819753 N, −100.65805210414699 W). The Los Azufres geothermal field’s zone is shown in the image. Google-Earth-generated image. (B) Sample of sediment taken from the Los Azufres geothermal field. Inside the rectangle, a sample of the green sediment was obtained.
Cimb 45 00370 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of microbial diversity of sediment sample from a steam vent of the geothermal field of Los Azufres. In the graph, each phylum is denoted by a different alphabet letter. Kaiju was used to complete the analysis of the microbial diversity.
Figure 2. Analysis of microbial diversity of sediment sample from a steam vent of the geothermal field of Los Azufres. In the graph, each phylum is denoted by a different alphabet letter. Kaiju was used to complete the analysis of the microbial diversity.
Cimb 45 00370 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap of functional diversity representation of each MAGs. The COG category is displayed on the y axis, and the x axis displays the MAGs.
Figure 3. Heatmap of functional diversity representation of each MAGs. The COG category is displayed on the y axis, and the x axis displays the MAGs.
Cimb 45 00370 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenomic tree of Thermoplasmatales archaea. The phylogenomic tree shows the predicted evolutionary relationships of genomes from the order Thermoplasmatales against genomes of Thermoplasmatales in NCBI database. MAGs recovered in this study are shown in bold letters. Aciduliprofundum boonei T469 was selected as an outgroup. Phylogenomic tree was generated using maximum likelihood model, and numbers at the branch points represent SH-like local support values. The scale bar represents the estimated number of amino acid changes per site.
Figure 4. Phylogenomic tree of Thermoplasmatales archaea. The phylogenomic tree shows the predicted evolutionary relationships of genomes from the order Thermoplasmatales against genomes of Thermoplasmatales in NCBI database. MAGs recovered in this study are shown in bold letters. Aciduliprofundum boonei T469 was selected as an outgroup. Phylogenomic tree was generated using maximum likelihood model, and numbers at the branch points represent SH-like local support values. The scale bar represents the estimated number of amino acid changes per site.
Cimb 45 00370 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenomic tree of Actinobacteria. The phylogenomic tree shows the predicted evolutionary relationships of genomes from the phylum Actinomycetota against genomes of Actinomycetota in NCBI database. MAGs recovered in this study are shown in bold letters. Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans strain ZJ was selected as an outgroup. Phylogenomic tree was generated using maximum likelihood model, and numbers at the branch points represent SH-like local support values. The scale bar represents the estimated number of amino acid changes per site.
Figure 5. Phylogenomic tree of Actinobacteria. The phylogenomic tree shows the predicted evolutionary relationships of genomes from the phylum Actinomycetota against genomes of Actinomycetota in NCBI database. MAGs recovered in this study are shown in bold letters. Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans strain ZJ was selected as an outgroup. Phylogenomic tree was generated using maximum likelihood model, and numbers at the branch points represent SH-like local support values. The scale bar represents the estimated number of amino acid changes per site.
Cimb 45 00370 g005
Table 1. Protein coding sequences classified in COGs categories. COGs categories were calculated with IMG/MER.
Table 1. Protein coding sequences classified in COGs categories. COGs categories were calculated with IMG/MER.
NameCountPercent
Amino acid transport and metabolism13,2989.74%
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism88186.46%
Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning16491.21%
Cell motility17851.31%
Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis64174.70%
Chromatin structure and dynamics1200.09%
Coenzyme transport and metabolism77445.67%
Cytoskeleton640.05%
Defense mechanisms37282.73%
Energy production and conversion95787.02%
Extracellular structures5780.42%
Function unknown55984.10%
General function prediction only15,04211.02%
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism70635.17%
Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport17991.32%
Lipid transport and metabolism72925.34%
Mobilome: prophages, transposons34662.54%
Nucleotide transport and metabolism35892.63%
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones55464.06%
RNA processing and modification480.04%
Replication, recombination and repair67564.95%
Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism45163.31%
Signal transduction mechanisms44553.26%
Transcription74525.46%
Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis10,1307.42%
Table 2. Statistical information of each bin obtained from the sediment metagenome. P—phylum, C—class, O—order, G—genus, S—species. BinA—archaea, BinB—bacteria, BinE—eukarya. Quality of MAGs: high quality (completeness ≥ 90% and contamination < 5%), medium quality (completeness ≥ 70% and contamination < 10%), and low quality (completeness < 70% or contamination ≥ 10%).
Table 2. Statistical information of each bin obtained from the sediment metagenome. P—phylum, C—class, O—order, G—genus, S—species. BinA—archaea, BinB—bacteria, BinE—eukarya. Quality of MAGs: high quality (completeness ≥ 90% and contamination < 5%), medium quality (completeness ≥ 70% and contamination < 10%), and low quality (completeness < 70% or contamination ≥ 10%).
Bin IDCompletenessContaminationQuality of MAGsGenome Size (bp)Number of ContigsN50 (Contigs)%GCCAT/BAT Classification
BinA00198.740High quality1,706,5748435,07034.95Ferroplasma (G)
BinA00269.121.87Low quality1,420,676702214835.95Ca. Parvarchaeota (P)
BinA00382.070Medium quality1,297,16520413,13037.39Cuniculiplasma (S)
BinA00481.781.87Medium quality1,253,227101156,28347.39Ca. Micrarchaeota (P)
BinA00595.525.65Medium quality2,123,3517571,12338.61Thermoplasmatales archaeon “E-plasma” (S)
BinA00695.394.84High quality1,747,2043488,71444.06Thermoplasmatales (O)
BinA00789.471.61Medium quality1,184,38211615,13643.18Thermoplasmatales archaeon “A-plasma” (S)
BinA00894.721.61High quality1,929,1736646,84342.25Thermoplasmatales (O)
BinA00997.655.69Medium quality1,716,1434079,70737.91Ferroplasma (G)
BinA01094.053.25High quality1,556,4446142,66739.16Ferroplasma (G)
BinA01180.1428.83Low quality3,842,11437014,84540.9Thermoplasmatales (O)
BinA01272.9220.33Low quality1,642,787523406444.62Thermoplasmatales archaeon “A-plasma” (S)
BinA01396.3719.35Low quality2,229,35814364,73244.7Thermoplasmatales archaeon “I-plasma” (S)
BinA01471.7717.34Low quality1,586,61720114,69341.52Thermoplasmatales (O))
BinA01574.6924.69Low quality1,450,37716215,44143.6Thermoplasmatales (O)
BinB00193.970High quality1,754,36420114,02466.67Gammaproteobacteria (C)
BinB00299.380High quality2,395,0715380,71062.41Pseudomonadota (P)
BinB00399.550.45High quality4,091,43917647,25666.49Actinomycetales (O)
BinB00492.740.85High quality2,246,041483652158.95Actinomycetota (P)
BinB00539.560.85Low quality1,299,422822156366.42Bacteria
BinB00697.861.14High quality3,765,92474128,32770.35Actinomycetota(P)
BinB00762.651.3Low quality1,844,347418460965.59Gammaproteobacteria (C)
BinB00896.581.38High quality2,544,0866060,56057.97Ferrimicrobium (S)
BinB00994.792.91High quality2,895,14034910,67073.1Actinomycetota (P)
BinB01051.913.23Low quality1,990,9731119186073.16Bacteria
BinB01197.593.48High quality5,183,77632024,92771.89Actinomycetales (O)
BinB01294.874.7High quality2,730,5289650,09073.93Actinomycetota (P)
BinB01394.028.93Medium quality3,691,086559893068.55Bacteria
BinE001NANANA162,1451589,08637.92Cyanidiaceae (F)
BinE002NANANA11,989,646192113,03653.45Cyanidiaceae (F)
BinE003NANANA113,433678,60128.14Cyanidiaceae (F)
BinE004NANANA142,617572,67128.44Cyanidiaceae (F)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marín-Paredes, R.; Bolívar-Torres, H.H.; Coronel-Gaytán, A.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E. A Metagenome from a Steam Vent in Los Azufres Geothermal Field Shows an Abundance of Thermoplasmatales archaea and Bacteria from the Phyla Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 5849-5864. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45070370

AMA Style

Marín-Paredes R, Bolívar-Torres HH, Coronel-Gaytán A, Martínez-Romero E, Servín-Garcidueñas LE. A Metagenome from a Steam Vent in Los Azufres Geothermal Field Shows an Abundance of Thermoplasmatales archaea and Bacteria from the Phyla Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023; 45(7):5849-5864. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45070370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marín-Paredes, Roberto, Hermes H. Bolívar-Torres, Alberto Coronel-Gaytán, Esperanza Martínez-Romero, and Luis E. Servín-Garcidueñas. 2023. "A Metagenome from a Steam Vent in Los Azufres Geothermal Field Shows an Abundance of Thermoplasmatales archaea and Bacteria from the Phyla Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 45, no. 7: 5849-5864. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45070370

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop