Next Article in Journal
Probiotic Potential of Clostridium spp.—Advantages and Doubts
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Thermogenic Fat Tissue in Energy Consumption
Previous Article in Journal
Sonicated Bordetella bronchiseptica Bacterin Can Protect Dendritic Cells from Differential Cytotoxicity Caused by Doxorubicin and Vincristine and Enhance Their Antigen-Presenting Capability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioactive Compounds and Adipocyte Browning Phenomenon
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 44
Issue 7
10.3390/cimb44070214
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantitative In Silico Evaluation of Allergenic Proteins from Anacardium occidentale, Carya illinoinensis, Juglans regia and Pistacia vera and Their Epitopes as Precursors of Bioactive Peptides †

by
Piotr Minkiewicz
1,*,
Christopher P. Mattison
2,* and
Małgorzata Darewicz
1
1
Chair of Food Biochemistry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Cieszyński 1, 10-726 Olsztyn-Kortowo, Poland
2
Southern Regional Research Center, FPSQ, ARS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(7), 3100-3117; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44070214
Submission received: 1 June 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 1 July 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Current Issues in Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of the study presented here was to determine if there is a correlation between the presence of specific protein domains within tree nut allergens or tree nut allergen epitopes and the frequency of bioactive fragments and the predicted susceptibility to enzymatic digestion in allergenic proteins from tree nuts of cashew (Anacardium occidentale), pecan (Carya illinoinensis), English walnut (Juglans regia) and pistachio (Pistacia vera) plants. These bioactive peptides are distributed along the length of the protein and are not enriched in IgE epitope sequences. Classification of proteins as bioactive peptide precursors based on the presence of specific protein domains may be a promising approach. Proteins possessing a vicilin, N-terminal family domain, or napin domain contain a relatively low occurrence of bioactive fragments. In contrast, proteins possessing the cupin 1 domain without the vicilin N-terminal family domain contain a relatively high total frequency of bioactive fragments and predicted release of bioactive fragments by the joint action of pepsin, trypsin, and chymotrypsin. This approach could be utilized in food science to simplify the selection of protein domains enriched for bioactive peptides.

1. Introduction

Food proteins contain the precursors of biologically active peptides. The most extensively studied activities of food derived peptides are (1) inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) (EC 3.4.15.1), (2) inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (EC 3.4.14.5) and (3) antioxidative activity [1,2].
ACE activity regulates blood pressure by causing blood vessels to constrict and is a target for the rational design of bioactive peptides [3]. This enzyme hydrolyzes inactive peptide Angiotensin I to vasoconstrictor Angiotensin II. The second peptide causes vasoconstriction and thus increase of blood pressure. Its inhibitors serve as antihypertensive drugs. Many peptides from foods reveals similar activity [1,2]. The role of dipeptidyl peptidases (e.g., dipeptidyl peptidase III and IV) has been reviewed by Sato and Ogita [4]. Dipeptidyl peptidase III (EC 3.4.14.4) degrades the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II, among other substrates. Dipeptidyl peptidase III inhibitors may therefore also be factors affecting blood pressure [5]. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV is a target for antidiabetic drugs inhibiting this enzyme [1,2,4]. Polyphenols and other antioxidants from diverse foods have beneficial anti-cancer and protective cardiovascular health activities [6]. Tree nuts are an excellent source of antioxidant activity and phytochemicals that are beneficial to human health [7].
Bioactive peptides can be found in diverse foods including those from animal and plant sources [8,9]. For example, peptides from wheat, oat, barley, and rice harbor sequences correlated with ACE and dipeptidyl peptidase inhibition, while peptides from rice and wheat storage proteins contain anti-cancer sequences [10]. Tree nut proteins are also sources of peptides with bioactive potential. For example, proteins from walnut (Juglans regia) are known as precursors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors [11,12,13], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors [14], peptides with antioxidant activity [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], peptides with anticancer activity [16], tyrosinase (EC 1.14.18.1) inhibitor [22], and anti-fatigue peptides [23]. Peptides with sequences YEP [11] and YVPHWEL [12] may serve as examples of ACE inhibitors from walnut. Kong et al. [14] has measured DPPIV inhibitory activity of hydrolysate of walnut proteins. Nine peptides have been identified using mass spectrometry. PPPIV inhibition by peptides was predicted using molecular docking. The antioxidative activity of walnut hydrolyzates and peptides was measured using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), and superoxide radical scavenging assays. Peptide with sequence ADAF is an example of antioxidative peptide from walnut. Liu et al. [19] and Wang et al. [20,21] highlighted neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of antioxidative peptides. The peptide with sequence FPY has been found as tyrosinase inhibitor [22]. Detailed review about biologically active peptides from walnut has been recently published [13]. Cashew (Anacardium occidentale), pecan (Carya illinoinensis), and pistachio (Pistacia vera) also are known as sources of peptides possessing various biological activities [24,25,26]. Known peptides isolated form cashew and pistachio revealed ACE inhibitory activity [24,25]. Peptides identified in the pecan hydrolysates represent diverse biological activities including ACE and DPPIV inhibition, antioxidative, anticancerogenic and other activities [26].
Food allergies are a worldwide health problem affecting millions of people. Food allergies are the result of a misguided immune response and are usually mediated by immunoglobulin-E (IgE) antibodies binding to otherwise innocuous food proteins. Several reasons, including environmental contributions, skin barrier dysfunction, nutritional deficiency, and microbiome alterations are thought to contribute to the apparent increase in food allergy incidence over the past three decades [27,28]. Food allergic reaction symptoms may include itching, hives, swelling, wheezing, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dizziness, fainting, or anaphylaxis in extreme cases. Peanuts and tree nuts (walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio) are included in a group of eight foods that commonly cause food allergy [29]. Three seed storage proteins from peanuts and tree nuts commonly act as immuno-dominant food allergens, including 2S albumin, 7S vicilin, and 11S legumin proteins, and the peptides derived from these proteins have been shown to bind IgE from tree nut allergic volunteers [30].
The biological, molecular, immunological, and physico-chemical properties of 2S albumin, 7S vicilin, and 11S legumin proteins from peanuts and tree nuts that contribute to their propensity to commonly act as allergens are not fully understood. A number of the 7S vicilin and 11S legumin proteins in the cupin family have been identified as plant food allergens. Several factors including protein stability, resistance to physical processing and enzymatic digestion, amino acid sequence, and protein conformation are thought to be important factors [31,32,33]. In addition, the amino acid sequence and conformational similarities of these proteins contribute to their potential to cross-react with IgE cognate to allergens from other tree nuts or peanuts [34,35,36]. Contemporary strategies of epitope prediction assume that they can be discriminated from the entire protein chain due to amino acid composition, amino acid order, or oligopeptide composition [37,38,39,40]. Alternatively, it may be that that epitopes differ from entire protein chains in frequency of occurrence of bioactive fragments. The most simple measure of this type of inspection would be the sum of fragment frequencies with particular activities [41].
The aim of the study presented here was to determine if there is a correlation between the presence of specific protein domains within tree nut allergens or tree nut allergen epitopes and the frequency of bioactive fragments and predicted susceptibility to enzymatic digestion in allergenic proteins from tree nuts of cashew (Anacardium occidentale), pecan (Carya illinoinensis), English walnut (Juglans regia) and pistachio (Pistacia vera) plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Protein Sequences

Protein sequences were obtained from the UniProt database https://www.uniprot.org/ [42] (accessed on 30 August 2020). The list of allergenic proteins is provided in Table 1. Sequences of linear epitopes were taken from the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) https://www.iedb.org/ [43] (accessed on 30 August 2020). Search options included: name of plant, both linear and discontinuous epitopes, all types of assays, positive assay results, no MHC restriction, any host and any disease. We have found only linear epitopes attributed to walnut, cashew, pecan or pistachio. Epitopes were aligned to protein sequences. BLAST program https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/sss/ncbiblast/ [44] (accessed on 30 August 2020) was used to find fragments overlapping partially or wholly with epitopes in precursor proteins belonging to various species. Due to fact that default parameters of BLAST program often produce false negative results with short peptide sequences used as a query the following search parameters were used: PAM 30 matrix and word size 3. Other parameters were default. Overlapping and adjacent epitopes were merged into longer fragments in agreement with the peptide scanning strategy, commonly used for epitope mapping [45].

2.2. BIOPEP-UWM Database of Bioactive Peptides

Both entire protein sequences and epitopic regions were submitted to analysis via the BIOPEP-UWM database of bioactive peptides https://biochemia.uwm.edu.pl/biopep-uwm/ [46] (accessed on 30 September 2020). The BIOPEP-UWM output included profiles and computation of the frequency of bioactive fragments occurrence in protein sequence (A) [47] calculated according to Equation (1).
A = a/N
where:
  • a—the number of fragments with given activity in a protein sequence,
  • N—the number of amino acid residues of protein chain.
The total frequency of occurrence of bioactive fragments (∑A) introduced by Minkiewicz et al. [41] was used as a parameter characterizing entire protein sequences and epitopes as precursors of bioactive fragments.
Simulated proteolysis was performed using the BIOPEP-UWM database. Theoretical degree of hydrolysis (DHT) and total frequency of release of bioactive fragments by proteolytic enzymes (∑AE) defined as sum of AE values for all peptide activities, were used as a scores characterizing entire protein sequences and epitopes as precursors of bioactive fragments.
Theoretical degree of hydrolysis (DHT) was calculated according to the Equation (2) [48].
DHt = d/D × 100%
  • d—number of hydrolyzed peptide bonds in a protein/peptide chain,
  • D—total number of peptide bonds in a protein/peptide chain.
Frequency of release of bioactive fragments by proteolytic enzymes was calculated according to the Equation (3) [41].
AE = d/N
  • d—the number of peptides with a given activity (e.g., ACE inhibitors) released by a given enzyme (e.g., trypsin),
  • N—the number of amino acid residues in protein.
DHt and ∑AE were calculated for simulated hydrolysis by enzymes of digestive tract: pepsin at pH > 2 (EC 3.4.23.1, BIOPEP-UWM ID 39), trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4, BIOPEP-UWM ID 12) and chymotrypsin A (EC 3.4.21.1, BIOPEP-UWM ID 11), in agreement with the recommendation of Brodkorb and co-workers [49].
Protein were classified according to the InterPro database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ [50] (accessed on 30 August 2020).
The following domain sets were defined:
(1)
IPR036312, IPR016140, IPR000617;
(2)
IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR011051, IPR006792;
(3a)
IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR011051;
(3b)
IPR022379, IPR006044, IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR011051.
Set 3 is defined as the merged sets of 3a and 3b.
For sets of protein sequences and epitope sequences arithmetic means of ∑A, DHt and ∑AE and standard deviations (SD) were calculated.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance of differences was calculated using t-test. Pairwise comparison was performed between features of group of entire proteins possessing given set of domains and epitopes from these proteins. Differences in features of proteins and in features of epitopes between particular groups of proteins were also calculated. Differences were considered as statistically significant if p value was below 0.05.
Program Heatmapper: http://www.heatmapper.ca/ (accessed on 30 August 2020) [51] was used for visualization of results of calculations.
Data concerning proteins submitted for analysis is presented in Table 1. Sequences of proteins with epitopes are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 and in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials.

2.4. Protein Modeling

Protein homology models were created and visualized using MOE software (version 2020.09, Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, QC, Canada, https://www.chemcomp.com/ (accessed on 30 August 2020)). Ana o 1.0101 and Ana o 2.0101 allergen models were created using the crystal structures of the major peanut allergens Ara h 1 (pdb 3SMH) [52] and Ara h 3 (pdb 3C3V) [53] as templates downloaded from the pdb website (https://www.rcsb.org/pages/policies (accessed on 30 August 2020)) [54].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Tree Nut Epitopes

The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) contains 150 sequential epitopes within the tree nut allergens examined and sequences of their linear epitopes, retrieved from the IEDB, are summarized in Table S2 in Supplementary Materials. Three homologous and commonly immuno-dominant tree nut allergens, including the 2S albumin, 7S vicilin, and 11S legumin, from each species were examined along with a few other allergens included in the IUIS list for walnut and pistachio.
Due to the relatively high level of conservation among the immuno-dominant peanut and tree nut allergens, they commonly cross-react [34]. For example, identity among tree nut allergens, such as those from pecan and walnut, can reach as high as 95% [34]. Clinical reactivity occurs when someone has allergic symptoms to a closely related food due to IgE recognition of a similar amino acid sequence or structural similarity among proteins in the food. For example, pecan and walnut allergens often cross-react, and recent studies indicate pecan epitopes represent a subset of walnut allergen epitopes [55]. Therefore, the presence of identical linear epitopes in allergens of C. illinoinensis and J. regia are summarized in Table 2. These epitopes were included in preprocessing analysis of epitopes of both species. Data preprocessing as described in the Methods section (aligning common epitopes to all proteins, merging adjacent and partially overlapping peptides) allowed the reduction of the epitope set to 64 non-redundant sequences. This preprocessing mimics the final step of experimental epitope mapping. Publication of Zhang et al. [56] concerning epitopes of tropomyosin from prawn Exopalaemon modestus many serve as a representative example of such work. The above Authors have found five epitopes with the length up to 38 amino acid residues on the basis of analysis performed using shorter overlapping or adjacent peptides. Discussion of the results included presence of the epitopes in sequences of other proteins with the same family. The sequences of epitopes after preprocessing and their location within proteins is presented in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Table S1 in Supplementary Materials.

3.2. Tree Nut Allergen Protein Domains

Proteins are classified into families based on the presence of characteristic domains [57,58,59]. A protein domain is considered a conserved part of a sequence and tertiary structure that is attributed to protein function, and exists independently of the rest of the protein chain [60]. The presence of domains may be the basis of classification of proteins as potential precursors of bioactive peptides [61]. Domains present in particular tree nut allergens are summarized in Table 1 and Table S1 (Supplementary Materials).
The most abundant domains occurring in the tree nut allergens include IPR006045 (Cupin 1), IPR011051 (RmlC-like cupin domain superfamily), IPR011051 (RmlC-like cupin domain superfamily) and IPR014710 (RmlC-like jelly roll fold). The above domains occur in 11 proteins. For example, the IPR006045 and IPR011051 cupin domains are found in each of the 7S vicilin and 11S legumin allergens from each tree nut (Table 1). Two proteins, Car i 2 and Jug r 2, contain domain IPR006792 (Vicilin, N-terminal). A family of proteins containing the four domains mentioned above is cited as Cupin 1/Vicilin, N-terminal. Alternatively, a family of proteins with Cupin 1 domain, but without Vicilin, N-terminal domain can be named Cupin 1 family. Nine proteins investigated within this work belong to the above Cupin 1 family. A few of them also contain the IPR006044 (11-S seed storage protein, plant) and IPR022379 (11-S seed storage protein, conserved site) domains. Another group of proteins, including the 2S albumins Ana o 3, Car i 1, Jug r 1, and Pis v 1 and the non-specific lipid transfer protein type 1 (nsLTP1) Jug r 3 contain domains associated with lipid transfer: IPR016140 (Bifunctional inhibitor/plant lipid transfer protein/seed storage helical domain) and IPR036312 (Bifunctional inhibitor/plant lipid transfer protein/seed storage helical domain superfamily). One of these five proteins (Jug r 3) contains domain IPR000528 (Plant lipid transfer protein/Par allergen), whereas the four 2S albumins contain domain IPR000617 (Napin/Bra allergen).

3.3. Correlation of Bioactive Fragments between Allergen Protein Domains and Epitopes

Profiles of the potential biological functions of specific allergen fragments are presented in Supplementary Materials (Tables S6–S21). One characteristic feature of these profiles is the presence of a large number of dipeptides as dominant bioactive fragment. There are also several bioactive tripeptides. Fragments revealing biological activity and longer than three amino acid residues are exceptions. We can thus suppose than dipeptide composition is crucial factor affecting frequency of occurrence of bioactive fragments in protein chain. Bioactive dipeptides may occur with high probability in any protein sequence. Longer fragments, such as epitopes may be common fragments of homologous proteins revealing a relatively high similarity of sequences [62]. Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (EC 3.4.14.5), angiotensin I-converting enzyme (EC 3.4.15.1), dipeptidyl peptidase III (EC 3.4.14.4) and antioxidative peptides are the most abundant bioactive peptides encrypted in the full-length allergen sequences and distinct epitopes.
All three scores describing occurrence and possibility of release of bioactive peptides from proteins and epitopes are presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6 respectively. The scores of individual proteins and individual epitopes are also summarized in Tables S3–S4 in Supplementary Materials. The mean scores of groups of proteins possessing particular sets of domains are presented in Figure 7 and in Table S5 in Supplementary Materials. The statistical significance of differences between particular groups of proteins is displayed in Figure 8 and in Table S5 in Supplementary Materials.
Two proteins are not included in Figure 5: Jug r 3 (Non-specific lipid transfer protein) and Pis v 4.0101 (Superoxide dismutase). Their families are represented only by single proteins. Jug r 3 possesses the following scores: ∑A = 1.4369; DHt = 66.1017% and ∑AE = 0.2520. The ∑A and ∑AE scores of Jug r 3 are the highest among all proteins subjected to analysis, whereas DHt is lower than for all other proteins. Sequence analysis of Pis v 4.0101 reveals the following scores: ∑A = 1.4345; DHt = 80.3493% and ∑AE = 0.1867. The ∑A of Pis v 4.0101 is only slightly lower than for Jug r 3 and much higher than for all other proteins. The Pis v 4.0101 DHt and ∑AE values are not unique from scores of other proteins. No information about epitopes of the above two allergens is available in the IEDB database. Their scores were included for calculation of mean values for all proteins.
Based on the results summarized in Figure 7 and Figure 8 as well as Table S3 we can conclude that scores describing the content and potential for release of bioactive peptides in the whole set of protein sequences and in the whole set of epitopes are nearly identical. Only epitopes from the Napin family (Set 1) reveal a lower ∑AE value than entire proteins belonging to the same family (Figure 7 and Figure 8, Table S5). The standard deviation of scores for epitopes is larger than in this of proteins (Figure 7). The frequency of bioactive peptide occurrence varies between families. Proteins possessing the Cupin 1 domain (domain sets 3a and 3b) reveal a relatively higher ∑A score. Proteins containing Vicilin N-terminal family domain apart from Cupin 1 (set 2), have a much lower ∑A than proteins from the previous family. Proteins containing a Napin domain have the lowest ∑A among the proteins investigated. One protein containing plant lipid transfer protein/Par allergen domain instead of Napin possess a relatively higher total frequency of occurrence of bioactive fragments. Replacement of one of three domains leads to significant change in the of bioactive fragment within the protein sequence. Also, the presence or absence of the Vicilin N-terminal family domain markedly affects the biological activity of protein fragments. There is no difference in any score between sets 3a and 3b (Figure 8). These sets are therefore included in Figure 5 and Figure 6 as one ‘set 3’ including all proteins containing domains attributed to the Cupin 1 family, but without Vicilin N-terminal family domain.
Epitopes within the proteins evaluated here reveal a broad range of frequency correlating with the occurrence of bioactive fragments (0.1–2.1). This range can be divided into four intervals: 0.1–0.5999; 0.6000–1.0999; 1.1000–1.5999 and 1.6000–2.1000 in agreement with a classification used by the Heatmapper program [51] (Table S4 in Supplementary Materials). Epitopes from the intervals with the highest and lowest ∑A are highlighted in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4. Epitopes from the interval with highest ∑A primarily contain fragments of proteins from the Cupin 1 family.
Predicted products of enzymatic hydrolysis of proteins are presented in Table S23 in Supplementary Materials. Peptides predicted to be released should be preceded and followed by bonds susceptible to one of enzymes used. Peptides may be theoretically released if peptide bonds within peptide are resistant to proteolysis. Program simulating proteolysis assumes that all bonds theoretically susceptible to enzyme action are hydrolysed. This assumption is oversimplification as compared with experimental hydrolysis. Hydrolysis by three enzymes should theoretically lead to release of free amino acids and short peptides, containing two or three amino acid residues. Peptides longer than three amino acid residues are exceptions (Table S23 in Supplementary Materials). Bioactive dipeptides are among predicted products of hydrolysis. The same peptide sequences may be found both in Tables S6–S22 and in Table S23.
There is no significant difference in the theoretical degree of hydrolysis between proteins and epitopes representing particular sets of domains with one exception. The difference between DHt of set 2 (the highest DHt among all groups of proteins) and DHT of set 1 (lowest DHt) is statistically significant (Figure 8). The theoretical degree of hydrolysis of all proteins and almost all epitopes exceeds 50%. This indicates that the predicted products are short peptides and free amino acids. The degree of hydrolysis is calculated assuming that all bonds theoretically susceptible to the enzymes applied are hydrolyzed. In actual protein digestion experiments however, this assumption is usually not fulfilled.
The frequency of bioactive fragment release by proteolytic enzyme reveals a high variability at the level of individual proteins and especially within epitope sequences (expressed as a large standard deviation—see Figure 7). Proteins and their epitopes with domains belonging to set 1 have significantly lower ∑AE scores compared to proteins within set 3. In the case of epitopes, there is also significant difference between epitopes attributed to set 1 and 2 (i.e., the ∑AE score for domain set 1 is lower than for set 2). On the other hand, in some instances there are epitopes with ∑AE = 0 attributed to proteins containing N-terminal vicilin domain (set 2).
The possible influence of individual domains on scores characterizing individual proteins and epitopes and their potential as precursors of bioactive peptides is presented in Table 3. The plant lipid transfer protein/Par allergen domain is associated with high ∑A and ∑AE scores, but this information is based on calculation results obtained for only one protein. The same finding is applicable to ∑A score in general for domains associated with manganese/iron superoxide dismutase. Domains possessing this label are not included in the conclusions presented here, due to the single sample analyzed. Among domains present in at least two proteins, the Napin/Bra allergen and Vicilin, N-terminal are associated with low ∑A and ∑AE scores. In contrast, the other domains appear to have no defined influence on scores characterizing proteins as potential precursors of bioactive peptides.
The presence of epitopes with highest frequency of occurrence correlating with bioactive fragments is consistent with the findings of Nardo et al. [61], who have drawn the conclusion that there are fragments within protein sequences considered as ‘hotspots’ rich in bioactive fragments. Epitopes from the interval with highest ∑A are fragments of proteins from the Cupin 1 family. For example, two segments with high ∑A scores in Ana o 2 overlap with epitopes and reside in the first cupin domain within the protein (Table 3 and Figure 1). Similarly, three segments with high ∑A scores in the Ana o 1 protein overlap with epitopes, but lie in loop regions in between and adjacent to the cupin domains (Table 3 and Figure 1). Two of the high scoring ∑A segments in Ana o 1 lie in between the two cupin domains, while the third resides in the carboxy terminal end of the protein (Figure 9). In contrast four of five epitopes from interval with lowest ∑A are fragments of proteins containing Vicilin, N-terminal family domain. However, other proteins from this family contain epitopes with relatively high ∑A values (e.g., fragment 684–704 of Car i 2.0101 or fragments 302–345 and 463–505 of Jug r. 2.0101), belonging to the interval 1.1000–1.5999. Lower scoring intervals 0.6000–1.0999 and 1.1000–1.5999 contain fragments of proteins belonging to all families possessing epitopes annotated in Immune Epitope Database.
The observed differences in bioactive fragment frequency between particular protein domains may provide an interesting approach for preliminary selection of food proteins as potential precursors of specific bioactive peptides. Early research works concerning classification of food proteins as precursors of bioactive peptides [63,64] were concentrated on the division of proteins into families based upon of differences in “A” scores corresponding to the particular activities. More recently, bioactive peptide research has included protein domain classifications [61,65]. However, there has been no association between the presence of certain domains and the incidence of bioactive fragments within those domains and their possible release by proteolytic enzymes. Successful implementation of this type of approach may allow the selection of plant or animal food varieties characterized by the presence of protein with domains harboring relatively rich sources of bioactive fragments.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, tree nut allergens possessing a Cupin 1 (without Vicilin, N-terminal family) domain reveal a relatively high overall occurrence of bioactive fragments and predicted frequency of bioactive fragment release by the joint action of pepsin, trypsin, and chymotrypsin along the length of the protein and within epitopes. In a few cases, there are epitopes harboring an exceptionally high occurrence of bioactive fragments, and they are primarily present in Cupin 1 family proteins. Overall, there is no significant difference in total frequency of bioactive fragment occurrence or theoretical degree of hydrolysis in the protein sequences and linear epitopes of the tree nut allergens evaluated here. The frequency of bioactive fragment occurrence and predicted frequency of bioactive fragment release by the joint action of pepsin, trypsin and chymotrypsin varies between different protein domains commonly found in tree nut allergens. Proteins possessing a Vicilin, N-terminal family domain or Napin domain reveal a relatively low total frequency of bioactive fragments and predicted frequency of release by the joint action of pepsin, trypsin, and chymotrypsin both along the length of the protein and in epitopes. IgE epitopes within Vicilin, N-terminal family allergens have an exceptionally low frequency of bioactive fragments occurrence and predicted frequency of release by the joint action of pepsin, trypsin, and chymotrypsin.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb44070214/s1. Supplementary Materials contain as follows: a list of allergens described in this work with the location of epitopes (Table S1), a list of epitopes retrieved from the Immune Epitope Database (Table S2), values of ∑A, DHt and ∑AE parameters for entire proteins and their epitopes (Table S3), values of ∑A, DHt and ∑AE parameters for individual epitopes (Table S4), values of ∑A, DHt and ∑AE scores of entire protein sequences and epitopes classified according to presence of sets of domains defined according to the InterPro database (Table S5), profiles of potential biological activity of fragments of particular allergens (Tables S6–S22) and results of proteolysis simulation, obtained using the BIOPEP-UWM program (Table S23).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P.M. and P.M.; methodology, P.M. and M.D.; software, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; validation, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; formal analysis, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; investigation, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; resources, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; data curation, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; writing—review and editing, P.M., C.P.M. and M.D.; visualization, C.P.M. and P.M.; supervision, C.P.M. and M.D.; project administration, C.P.M. and M.D.; funding acquisition, C.P.M. and M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by funds from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service to C.P.M. (project number 6054-43440-046-00-D). The contribution of P.M. and M.D. was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science as part of the program entitled “Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19, amount of funding 12.000.000 PLN.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Iwaniak, A.; Darewicz, M.; Minkiewicz, P. Peptides Derived from Foods as Supportive Diet Components in the Prevention of Metabolic Syndrome. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Barati, M.; Javanmardi, F.; Mousavi Jazayeri, S.M.H.; Jabbari, M.; Rahmani, J.; Barati, F.; Nickho, H.; Davoodi, S.H.; Roshanravan, N.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Techniques, perspectives, and challenges of bioactive peptide generation: A comprehensive systematic review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1488–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Manzanares, P.; Gandía, M.; Garrigues, S.; Marcos, J.F. Improving Health-Promoting Effects of Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides through Rational Design and Oral Delivery Strategies. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sato, A.; Ogita, H. Pathophysiological Implications of Dipeptidyl Peptidases. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017, 18, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pang, X.; Shimizu, A.; Kurita, S.; Zankov, D.P.; Takeuchi, K.; Yasuda-Yamahara, M.; Kume, S.; Ishida, T.; Ogita, H. Novel Therapeutic Role for Dipeptidyl Peptidase III in the Treatment of Hypertension. Hypertension 2016, 68, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Câmara, J.S.; Albuquerque, B.R.; Aguiar, J.; Corrêa, R.C.G.; Gonçalves, J.L.; Granato, D.; Pereira, J.A.M.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I. Food Bioactive Compounds and Emerging Techniques for Their Extraction: Polyphenols as a Case Study. Foods 2020, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bolling, B.W.; Chen, C.Y.; McKay, D.L.; Blumberg, J.B. Tree nut phytochemicals: Composition, antioxidant capacity, bioactivity, impact factors. A systematic review of almonds, Brazils, cashews, hazelnuts, macadamias, pecans, pine nuts, pistachios and walnuts. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2011, 24, 244–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karami, Z.; Akbari-Adergani, B. Bioactive food derived peptides: A review on correlation between structure of bioactive peptides and their functional properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sánchez, A.; Vázquez, A. Bioactive peptides: A review. Food Qual. Saf. 2017, 1, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cavazos, A.; Gonzalez de Mejia, E. Identification of Bioactive Peptides from Cereal Storage Proteins and Their Potential Role in Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 364–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gu, X.; Hou, Y.-K.; Li, D.; Wang, J.-Z.; Wang, F.-J. Separation, Purification, and Identification of Angiotensin I–Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides from Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Hydrolyzate. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, F.-J.; Yin, X.-Y.; Regenstein, J.M.; Wang, J.-Z. Separation and purification of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from walnuts (Juglans regia L.) meal. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, D.; Guo, Y.; Ma, H. Production, bioactivities and bioavailability of bioactive peptides derived from walnut origin by-products: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kong, X.; Zhang, L.; Song, W.; Zhang, C.; Hua, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, X. Separation, identification and molecular binding mechanism of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory peptides derived from walnut (Juglans regia L.) protein. Food Chem. 2021, 347, 129062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, N.; Yang, H.; Sun, Y.; Niu, J.; Liu, S. Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides from walnut (Juglans regia L.) protein hydrolysates. Peptides 2012, 38, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jahanbani, R.; Ghaffari, S.M.; Salami, M.; Vahdati, K.; Sepehri, H.; Sarvestani, N.N.; Sheibani, N.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A. Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Protein Hydrolysates Using Different Proteases. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2016, 71, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Liu, M.C.; Yang, S.J.; Hong, D.; Yang, J.P.; Liu, M.; Lin, Y.; Huang, C.H.; Wang, C.J. A simple and convenient method for the preparation of antioxidant peptides from walnut (Juglans regia L.) protein hydrolysates. Chem. Cent. J. 2016, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, M.; Yang, S.; Yang, J.; Lee, Y.; Kou, J.; Wang, C. Neuroprotective and memory-enhancing effects of antioxidant peptide from walnut (Juglans regia L.) protein hydrolysates. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X19865838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sheng, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.; Peng, T.; Yin, X.; Liu, W.; Liang, M.; Wan, J.; Yang, X. Antioxidative Effects and Mechanism Study of Bioactive Peptides from Defatted Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Meal Hydrolysate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3305–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.; Zheng, L.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Sun, B.; Su, G.; Zhao, M. Inhibitory Effects of Walnut (Juglans regia) Peptides on Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Stress in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cognitive Impairment Mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 2381–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, S.; Su, G.; Zhang, X.; Song, G.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, L.; Zhao, M. Characterization and Exploration of Potential Neuroprotective Peptides in Walnut (Juglans regia) Protein Hydrolysate against Cholinergic System Damage and Oxidative Stress in Scopolamine-Induced Cognitive and Memory Impairment Mice and Zebrafish. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2773–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, Y.X.; Wang, Z.C.; Chen, J.X.; Li, H.R.; Wang, Y.B.; Ren, D.F.; Lu, J. Separation, identification, and molecular docking of tyrosinase inhibitory peptides from the hydrolysates of defatted walnut (Juglans regia L.) meal. Food Chem. 2021, 353, 129471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, R.; Wu, L.; Du, Q.; Ren, J.W.; Chen, Q.H.; Li, D.; Mao, R.X.; Liu, X.R.; Li, Y. Small Molecule Oligopeptides Isolated from Walnut (Juglans regia L.) and Their Anti-Fatigue Effects in Mice. Molecules 2018, 24, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Li, P.; Jia, J.; Fang, M.; Zhang, L.; Guo, M.; Xie, J.; Xia, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wei, D. In vitro and in vivo ACE inhibitory of pistachio hydrolysates and in silico mechanism of identified peptide binding with ACE. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yao, G.-l.; Chai, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, Y.-G. Separation and identification of ACE inhibitory peptides from cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale Linnaeus) protein. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, S981–S991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mares-Mares, E.; Gutierrez-Vargas, S.; Perez-Moreno, L.; Ordonez-Acevedo, L.G.; Barboza-Corona, J.E.; Leon-Galvan, M.F. Characterization and Identification of Cryptic Biopeptides in Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh K. Koch) Storage Proteins. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1549156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Lopes, J.P.; Sicherer, S. Food allergy: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2020, 66, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Warren, C.M.; Jiang, J.; Gupta, R.S. Epidemiology and Burden of Food Allergy. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020, 20, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suther, C.; Moore, M.D.; Beigelman, A.; Zhou, Y. The Gut Microbiome and the Big Eight. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Willison, L.N.; Sathe, S.K.; Roux, K.H. Production and analysis of recombinant tree nut allergens. Methods 2014, 66, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Breiteneder, H.; Mills, E.N. Molecular properties of food allergens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005, 115, 14–23, quiz 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Geiselhart, S.; Hoffmann-Sommergruber, K.; Bublin, M. Tree nut allergens. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 100, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Palladino, C.; Breiteneder, H. Peanut allergens. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 100, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Smeekens, J.M.; Bagley, K.; Kulis, M. Tree Nut Allergies: Allergen Homology, Cross-reactivity, and Implications for Therapy. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dreskin, S.C.; Koppelman, S.J.; Andorf, S.; Nadeau, K.C.; Kalra, A.; Braun, W.; Negi, S.S.; Chen, X.; Schein, C.H. The importance of the 2S albumins for allergenicity and cross-reactivity of peanuts, tree nuts, and sesame seeds. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 1154–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fuhrmann, V.; Huang, H.J.; Akarsu, A.; Shilovskiy, I.; Elisyutina, O.; Khaitov, M.; van Hage, M.; Linhart, B.; Focke-Tejkl, M.; Valenta, R.; et al. From Allergen Molecules to Molecular Immunotherapy of Nut Allergy: A Hard Nut to Crack. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 742732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shi, Y. Identifying Linear B-cell Epitopes Based on Incorporated Sequence Information. Curr. Proteom. 2018, 15, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hasan, M.M.; Khatun, M.S.; Kurata, H. iLBE for Computational Identification of Linear B-cell Epitopes by Integrating Sequence and Evolutionary Features. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2020, 18, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yao, B.; Zheng, D.; Liang, S.; Zhang, C. SVMTriP: A Method to Predict B-Cell Linear Antigenic Epitopes. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2131, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ras-Carmona, A.; Pelaez-Prestel, H.F.; Lafuente, E.M.; Reche, P.A. BCEPS: A Web Server to Predict Linear B Cell Epitopes with Enhanced Immunogenicity and Cross-Reactivity. Cells 2021, 10, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Minkiewicz, P.; Dziuba, J.; Michalska, J. Bovine meat proteins as potential precursors of biologically active peptides—A computational study based on the BIOPEP database. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2011, 17, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: A worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D506–D515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Vita, R.; Mahajan, S.; Overton, J.A.; Dhanda, S.K.; Martini, S.; Cantrell, J.R.; Wheeler, D.K.; Sette, A.; Peters, B. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D339–D343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhou, F.; He, S.; Sun, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Advances in epitope mapping technologies for food protein allergens: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 107, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Minkiewicz, P.; Iwaniak, A.; Darewicz, M. BIOPEP-UWM Database of Bioactive Peptides: Current Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dziuba, J.; Iwaniak, A.; Minkiewicz, P. Computer-aided characteristics of proteins as potential precursors of bioactive peptides. Polimery 2003, 48, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Nielsen, P.M.; Petersen, D.; Dambmann, C. Improved Method for Determining Food Protein Degree of Hydrolysis. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brodkorb, A.; Egger, L.; Alminger, M.; Alvito, P.; Assuncao, R.; Ballance, S.; Bohn, T.; Bourlieu-Lacanal, C.; Boutrou, R.; Carriere, F.; et al. INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 991–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Blum, M.; Chang, H.Y.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Kandasaamy, S.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Qureshi, M.; Raj, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D344–D354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Babicki, S.; Arndt, D.; Marcu, A.; Liang, Y.; Grant, J.R.; Maciejewski, A.; Wishart, D.S. Heatmapper: Web-enabled heat mapping for all. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W147–W153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cabanos, C.; Urabe, H.; Tandang-Silvas, M.R.; Utsumi, S.; Mikami, B.; Maruyama, N. Crystal structure of the major peanut allergen Ara h 1. Mol. Immunol. 2011, 49, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jin, T.; Guo, F.; Chen, Y.W.; Howard, A.; Zhang, Y.Z. Crystal structure of Ara h 3, a major allergen in peanut. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 46, 1796–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Burley, S.K.; Bhikadiya, C.; Bi, C.; Bittrich, S.; Chen, L.; Crichlow, G.V.; Christie, C.H.; Dalenberg, K.; Di Costanzo, L.; Duarte, J.M.; et al. RCSB Protein Data Bank: Powerful new tools for exploring 3D structures of biological macromolecules for basic and applied research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology, bioengineering and energy sciences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D437–D451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elizur, A.; Appel, M.Y.; Nachshon, L.; Levy, M.B.; Epstein-Rigbi, N.; Pontoppidan, B.; Lidholm, J.; Goldberg, M.R. Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Walnut and Pecan Allergy (NUT CRACKER Study). J. Allergy Clin. Immunology. Pract. 2020, 8, 157–165.e152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Z.; Li, X.M.; Xiao, H.; Nowak-Wegrzyn, A.; Zhou, P. IgE-binding epitope mapping of tropomyosin allergen (Exo m 1) from Exopalaemon modestus, the freshwater Siberian prawn. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dessailly, B.H.; Redfern, O.C.; Cuff, A.; Orengo, C.A. Exploiting structural classifications for function prediction: Towards a domain grammar for protein function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Levitt, M. Nature of the protein universe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11079–11084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Scaiewicz, A.; Levitt, M. The language of the protein universe. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2015, 35, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wetlaufer, D.B. Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 70, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Nardo, A.E.; Anon, M.C.; Parisi, G. Large-scale mapping of bioactive peptides in structural and sequence space. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Minkiewicz, P.; Darewicz, M.; Iwaniak, A.; Sokołowska, J.; Starowicz, P.; Bucholska, J.; Hrynkiewicz, M. Common Amino Acid Subsequences in a Universal Proteome—Relevance for Food Science. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 20748–20773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Dziuba, M.; Dziuba, J.; Minkiewicz, P. Design of food protein proteolysis with a view to obtaining bioactive peptides. Pol. J. Nat. Sci. 2006, 21, 999–1020. [Google Scholar]
  64. Dziuba, M.; Darewicz, M. Food Proteins as Precursors of Bioactive Peptides—Classification Into Families. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2007, 13, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Iwaniak, A.; Dziuba, J. Analysis of Domains in Selected Plant and Animal Food Proteins-Precursors of Biologically Active Peptides—In Silico Approach. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2009, 15, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cimb 44 00214 g001 550
Figure 1. Sequences of allergens from Anacardium occidentale. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000), blue background indicates epitopes with lowest ∑A (range 0.1000–0.5999).
Figure 1. Sequences of allergens from Anacardium occidentale. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000), blue background indicates epitopes with lowest ∑A (range 0.1000–0.5999).
Cimb 44 00214 g001
Cimb 44 00214 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequences of allergens from Carya illinoinensis. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000), blue background indicates epitopes with lowest ∑A (range 0.1000–0.5999). Bold font indicates epitopes and their fragments occurring both in Carya illinoinensis and Juglans regia proteins.
Figure 2. Sequences of allergens from Carya illinoinensis. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000), blue background indicates epitopes with lowest ∑A (range 0.1000–0.5999). Bold font indicates epitopes and their fragments occurring both in Carya illinoinensis and Juglans regia proteins.
Cimb 44 00214 g002
Cimb 44 00214 g003 550
Figure 3. Sequences of allergens from Juglans regia. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000), blue background indicates epitopes with lowest ∑A (range 0.1000–0.5999). Bold font indicates epitopes and their fragments occurring both in Carya illinoinensis and Juglans regia proteins.
Figure 3. Sequences of allergens from Juglans regia. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000), blue background indicates epitopes with lowest ∑A (range 0.1000–0.5999). Bold font indicates epitopes and their fragments occurring both in Carya illinoinensis and Juglans regia proteins.
Cimb 44 00214 g003
Cimb 44 00214 g004 550
Figure 4. Sequences of allergens from Pistacia vera. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000).
Figure 4. Sequences of allergens from Pistacia vera. Location of epitopes is indicated using red font. Green background indicates epitopes with highest ∑A (range 1.6000–2.1000).
Cimb 44 00214 g004
Cimb 44 00214 g005 550
Figure 5. Scores describing entire proteins as potential precursors of bioactive peptides. (a) domain sets present in proteins: 1 (blue)—Set 1; 2 (green)—set 2; 3 (yellow)—set 3 (3a + 3b); (b) ∑A; (c) DHt [%]; (d) ∑AE. Proteins are sorted from highest to lowest ∑A value (column (b)).
Figure 5. Scores describing entire proteins as potential precursors of bioactive peptides. (a) domain sets present in proteins: 1 (blue)—Set 1; 2 (green)—set 2; 3 (yellow)—set 3 (3a + 3b); (b) ∑A; (c) DHt [%]; (d) ∑AE. Proteins are sorted from highest to lowest ∑A value (column (b)).
Cimb 44 00214 g005
Cimb 44 00214 g006 550
Figure 6. Scores concerning potential release of bioactive peptides from epitopes. (a) domain sets present in proteins: 1 (blue)—Set 1; 2 (green)—set 2; 3 (yellow)—set 3 (3a + 3b); (b) ∑A; (c) DHt [%]; (d) ∑AE. Epitopes are sorted from highest to lowest ∑A value (column (b)).
Figure 6. Scores concerning potential release of bioactive peptides from epitopes. (a) domain sets present in proteins: 1 (blue)—Set 1; 2 (green)—set 2; 3 (yellow)—set 3 (3a + 3b); (b) ∑A; (c) DHt [%]; (d) ∑AE. Epitopes are sorted from highest to lowest ∑A value (column (b)).
Cimb 44 00214 g006
Cimb 44 00214 g007 550
Figure 7. Scores attributed to particular set of domains. ∑A—total frequency of bioactive fragments occurrence in a protein sequence (Equation (1)); DHt—theoretical degree of hydrolysis (Equation (2)) expressed in %; ∑AE—total frequency of release of bioactive fragments by proteolytic enzymes (Equation (3)), SD—standard deviation.
Figure 7. Scores attributed to particular set of domains. ∑A—total frequency of bioactive fragments occurrence in a protein sequence (Equation (1)); DHt—theoretical degree of hydrolysis (Equation (2)) expressed in %; ∑AE—total frequency of release of bioactive fragments by proteolytic enzymes (Equation (3)), SD—standard deviation.
Cimb 44 00214 g007
Cimb 44 00214 g008 550
Figure 8. Differences in scores between groups of proteins containing particular sets of domains, expressed as matrices of Euclidean distances: (a) ∑A; (b) DHt [%]; (c) ∑AE Differences subjected to t-test are labeled. Symbol “+” indicates differences that are statistically significant at p < 0.05. Symbol “−“ indicates a lack of statistically significant difference.
Figure 8. Differences in scores between groups of proteins containing particular sets of domains, expressed as matrices of Euclidean distances: (a) ∑A; (b) DHt [%]; (c) ∑AE Differences subjected to t-test are labeled. Symbol “+” indicates differences that are statistically significant at p < 0.05. Symbol “−“ indicates a lack of statistically significant difference.
Cimb 44 00214 g008
Cimb 44 00214 g009 550
Figure 9. Cupin domain proteins associated with relatively high ∑A scores. Ana o 1.0101 or (a) and Ana o 2.0101 (b) ribbon models indicating the relative placement of segments within the two allergens having high ∑A scores. Loop sections are colored red, cupin domains yellow, and segments with high ∑A scores in green.
Figure 9. Cupin domain proteins associated with relatively high ∑A scores. Ana o 1.0101 or (a) and Ana o 2.0101 (b) ribbon models indicating the relative placement of segments within the two allergens having high ∑A scores. Loop sections are colored red, cupin domains yellow, and segments with high ∑A scores in green.
Cimb 44 00214 g009
Table
Table 1. List of allergenic proteins submitted to in silico analysis.
Table 1. List of allergenic proteins submitted to in silico analysis.
NoSpeciesProtein
Type		Allergen
Name		UniProt Access. NoInterPro Domain IDs 1Set of Domains
1Anacardium occidentale7S vicilinAna o 1.0101Q8L5L5IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513a
2Anacardium occidentale7S vicilinAna o 1.0102Q8L5L6IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513a
3Anacardium occidentale11S leguminAna o 2.0101Q8GZP6IPR022379, IPR006044, IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513b
4Anacardium occidentale2S albuminAna o 3.0101Q8H2B8IPR036312, IPR016140, IPR0006171
5Carya illinoinensis2S albuminCar i 1.0101Q84XA9IPR036312, IPR016140, IPR0006171
6Carya illinoinensis7S viclinCar i 2.0101B3STU4IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR011051, IPR0067922
7Carya illinoinensis11S leguminCar i 4.0101B5KVH4IPR022379, IPR006044, IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513b
8Juglans regia2S albuminJug r 1.0101P93198IPR036312, IPR016140, IPR0006171
9Juglans regia7S vicilinJug r 2.0101Q9SEW4IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR011051, IPR0067922
10Juglans regianon-specific lipid transfer protein type 1 (nsLTP1)Jug r 3C5H617IPR036312, IPR016140, IPR000528-
11Juglans regia11S leguminJug r 4.0101Q2TPW5IPR022379, IPR006044, IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513b
12Pistacia vera2S albuminPis v 1.0101B7P072IPR036312, IPR016140, IPR0006171
13Pistacia vera11S leguminPis v 2.0101B7P073IPR022379, IPR006044, IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513b
14Pistacia vera11S leguminPis v 2.0201B7P074IPR022379, IPR006044, IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513b
15Pistacia vera7S vicilinPis v 3.0101B4X640IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513a
16Pistacia veramanganese superoxide dismutasePis v 4.0101B2BDZ8IPR001189, IPR019833, IPR019832, IPR019831, IPR036324, IPR036314-
17Pistacia vera11S leguminPis v 5.0101B7SLJ1IPR006044, IPR006045, IPR014710, IPR0110513b
1 IDs of domains according to the InterPro database.
Table
Table 2. Interspecies share of linear epitopes between proteins from C. illinoinensis and J. regia.
Table 2. Interspecies share of linear epitopes between proteins from C. illinoinensis and J. regia.
Epitopes (ID According to the Immune Epitope Database) 1Allergen Containing Epitopes, Annotated in Immune Epitope DatabaseAllergen Containing Epitopes, Found in the UniProt Database Using BLAST
157220, 157381, 157603, 157808, 157835Car i 4.0101Jug r 4.0101
174135Jug r 1.0101Car i 1.0101
157811, 158509, 241161, 241344, 241355, 241557Jug r 2.0101Car i 2.0101
114508, 114569, 114610, 114627, 114695Jug r 4.0101Car i 4.0101
1 Sequences of epitopes retrieved from IEDB are presented in Table S2 (Supplementary Materials).
Table
Table 3. Summary of domains present in allergenic proteins.
Table 3. Summary of domains present in allergenic proteins.
IDNameScore for Entire ProteinsScore for Epitopes
∑A DHt∑AE∑A DHt∑AE
IPR000528Plant lipid transfer protein/Par allergen+ (s)− (s)+ (s)ndndnd
IPR000617Napin/Bra allergen−−−−0−
IPR001189Manganese/iron superoxide dismutase + (s)0 (s)0 (s)ndndnd
IPR00604411-S seed storage protein, plant000000
IPR006045Cupin 1+0++0+
IPR006792Vicilin, N-terminal−+−−00
IPR011051RmlC-like cupin domain superfamily+0++0+
IPR014710RmlC-like jelly roll fold+0++0+
IPR016140Bifunctional inhibitor/plant lipid transfer protein/seed storage helical domain000−0−
IPR019831Manganese/iron superoxide dismutase, N-terminal+ (s)0 (s)0 (s)ndndnd
IPR019832Manganese/iron superoxide dismutase, C-terminal+ (s)0 (s)0 (s)ndndnd
IPR019833Manganese/iron superoxide dismutase, binding site+ (s)0 (s)0 (s)ndndnd
IPR02237911-S seed storage protein, conserved site000000
IPR036312Bifunctional inhibitor/plant lipid transfer protein/seed storage helical domain superfamily000−0−
IPR036314Manganese/iron superoxide dismutase, C-terminal domain superfamily+ (s)0 (s)0 (s)ndndnd
IPR036324Manganese/iron superoxide dismutase, N-terminal domain superfamily+ (s)0 (s)0 (s)ndndnd
“+”—presence of domain associated with high score; “−“—presence of domain associated with low score; “0”—presence of domain has no defined influence on score; “nd”—no data; (s)—score for single protein.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Minkiewicz, P.; Mattison, C.P.; Darewicz, M. Quantitative In Silico Evaluation of Allergenic Proteins from Anacardium occidentale, Carya illinoinensis, Juglans regia and Pistacia vera and Their Epitopes as Precursors of Bioactive Peptides. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 3100-3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44070214

AMA Style

Minkiewicz P, Mattison CP, Darewicz M. Quantitative In Silico Evaluation of Allergenic Proteins from Anacardium occidentale, Carya illinoinensis, Juglans regia and Pistacia vera and Their Epitopes as Precursors of Bioactive Peptides. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(7):3100-3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44070214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minkiewicz, Piotr, Christopher P. Mattison, and Małgorzata Darewicz. 2022. "Quantitative In Silico Evaluation of Allergenic Proteins from Anacardium occidentale, Carya illinoinensis, Juglans regia and Pistacia vera and Their Epitopes as Precursors of Bioactive Peptides" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 7: 3100-3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44070214

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop