Next Article in Journal
Comparative Investigation into the Roles of Imipenem:Cyclodextrin Complexation and Antibiotic Combination in Combatting Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Extrudate-Based Textural Properties on Pellet Molding Quality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Radiochemical and Biological Evaluation of 3p-C-NETA-ePSMA-16, a Promising PSMA-Targeting Agent for Radiotheranostics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Novel Imaging Probes: From Design to Applications

Department of Chemistry, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 974301, Taiwan
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(10), 1506; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16101506
Submission received: 20 October 2023 / Revised: 23 October 2023 / Accepted: 23 October 2023 / Published: 23 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Imaging Probes: From Design to Applications)
Molecular imaging has emerged as a powerful tool for clinical diagnosis. Several imaging modalities, including positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and optical bioluminescence/fluorescence imaging, rely on the administration of molecular probes to acquire imaging signals. To be considered suitable for clinical applications, an ideal molecular imaging probe should demonstrate exceptional affinity, selectivity, stability and ability to be economically produced [1]. As it involves multi-disciplinary fields, developing imaging probes requires the collaborative efforts of experts in chemistry, biology, pharmaceuticals, radiochemistry and clinics. Recently, the advancement of medical knowledge and innovative chemical tools has driven the progress and new development of imaging probes. In this Special Issue, we collect four research papers and one review article describing inspiring chemical designs on imaging probes to enhance imaging quality or extend their utilities.
Bifunctional chelators (BFCs) serve as stable linkages between radionuclides and biovectors. The intelligent selection of a BFC is capable of labeling different radionuclides, which facilitates the simultaneous development of diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals on the same biovectors [2,3,4]. Murce et al. (contribution 1) reported the synthesis and radiolabeling of 3p-C-NETA-ePSMA-16 with diagnostic radionuclides 111In, Al18F and therapeutic radionuclides 177Lu, 213Bi to evaluate them as PSMA-targeting agents for radiotheranostics. Radiolabeling processes using the above radionuclides were efficient. The resulting two imaging probes, [18F]AlF-3p-C-NETA-ePSMA-16 and [111In]In-3p-C-NETA-ePSMA-16, both exhibited targeting specificity toward PSMA-positive tumors. Because of the rapid clearance of probes, short half-life radionuclides, such as 213Bi, were suggested for further therapeutic agent development based on 3p-C-NETA-ePSMA-16.
The use of click chemistry to develop imaging probes has emerged as a recent trend [5,6,7]. A bioorthogonal click reaction involving the condensation between trans-cyclooctenes (TCO) and tetrazine (Tz) in the inverse electron demand Diels–Alder (IEDDA) reaction is frequently used as a pre-targeting strategy [8,9,10]. Beaufrez et al. (contribution 2) employed a sultone ring-opening method to prepare hydrophilic [18F]fluorosulfotetrazine as a prosthetic agent, which can be further labeled with other biovectors via an IEDDA reaction. The new [18F]F-labeling agent exhibited fast clearance and no non-specific uptake in normal tissues, showing its potential for in vivo pre-targeting applications.
The fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a “pan-tumoral” biotarget for molecular imaging and the treatment of various cancers [11]. Typical FAP-targeted ligands contain a 2-cyanopyrrolidine moiety, a glycine linker, and a quinolinyl group [12,13]. Based on these scaffolds, Lin’s group (contributions 3 and 4) reported two new series of FAP-targeted imaging probes in their in vivo studies. They found that the [68Ga]Ga-labeled pyridine-based FAP-targeted tracers revealed higher tumor-to-background ratios but lower tumor uptake compared to the standard probe. On the other hand, the pyrrolidinylboronic acid-based probes displayed low-to-medium tumor uptakes, though the replacement of the glycine linker with d-alanine enhanced tumor uptake. This research provides an in-depth structure–activity relationship (SAR) study for the development of FAP-targeted imaging probes.
A nanobody is the smallest antibody fragment comprising a single monomeric variable antigen-binding domain [14,15]. Bocancia-Mateescu et al. (contribution 5) reviewed recent developments in nanobody discovery, production and current challenges in applications for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The authors also highlight the potential of nanobodies in the treatment of CVDs, including their ability to target specific biomarkers, act as labeling molecules, or assist in the delivery of drugs to specific targets. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the current research on nanobodies and their potential applications in the field of CVDs, making it a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians and students interested in this topic.
In conclusion, this Special Issue underscores diverse and innovative approaches in developing imaging probes, ranging from bifunctional chelators for radiopharmaceuticals to click chemistry and nanobodies for targeted diagnostics and therapy. These advancements hold great promise for enhancing the field of molecular imaging and its applications in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

List of Contributions

  • Murce, E.; Ahenkorah, S.; Beekman, S.; Handula, M.; Stuurman, D.; de Ridder, C.; Cleeren, F.; Seimbille, Y. Radiochemical and Biological Evaluation of 3p-C-NETA-ePSMA-16, a Promising PSMA-Targeting Agent for Radiotheranostics. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 882.
  • Beaufrez, J.; Guillouet, S.; Seimbille, Y.; Perrio, C. Synthesis, Fluorine-18 Radiolabeling, and In Vivo PET Imaging of a Hydrophilic Fluorosulfotetrazine. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 636.
  • Bendre, S.; Kuo, H.-T.; Merkens, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wong, A.A.W.L.; Bénard, F.; Lin, K.-S. Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of Novel 68Ga-Labeled (R)-Pyrrolidin-2-yl-boronic Acid-Based PET Tracers for Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Cancer Imaging. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 798.
  • Verena, A.; Kuo, H.-T.; Merkens, H.; Zeisler, J.; Bendre, S.; Wong, A.A.W.L.; Bénard, F.; Lin, K.-S. Novel 68Ga-Labeled Pyridine-Based Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Tracers with High Tumor-to-Background Contrast. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 449.
  • Bocancia-Mateescu, L.-A.; Stan, D.; Mirica, A.-C.; Ghita, M.G.; Stan, D.; Ruta, L.L. Nanobodies as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Tools for Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 863.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, K.; Chen, X. Design and development of molecular imaging probes. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rosar, F.; Hau, F.; Bartholoma, M.; Maus, S.; Stemler, T.; Linxweiler, J.; Ezziddin, S.; Khreish, F. Molecular imaging and biochemical response assessment after a single cycle of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 tandem therapy in mCRPC patients who have progressed on [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 monotherapy. Theranostics 2021, 11, 4050–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ahenkorah, S.; Murce, E.; Cawthorne, C.; Ketchemen, J.P.; Deroose, C.M.; Cardinaels, T.; Seimbille, Y.; Fonge, H.; Gsell, W.; Bormans, G.; et al. 3p-C-NETA: A versatile and effective chelator for development of Al 18F-labeled and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Theranostics 2022, 12, 5971–5985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Laurene, W.; Raul, L.; Katalin, S.; Celine, F.; Gilles, K.; Antonio, M.; Charlotte, C.; Samir, A. Design and synthesis of a new bifunctional chelating agent: Application for Al 18F/177Lu complexation. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2023, 246, 112267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhong, X.; Yan, J.; Ding, X.; Su, C.; Xu, Y.; Yang, M. Recent Advances in Bioorthogonal Click Chemistry for Enhanced PET and SPECT Radiochemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 2023, 34, 457–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zeng, D.; Zeglis, B.M.; Lewis, J.S.; Anderson, C.J. The growing impact of bioorthogonal click chemistry on the development of radiopharmaceuticals. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bauer, D.; Cornejo, M.A.; Hoang, T.T.; Lewis, J.S.; Zeglis, B.M. Click Chemistry and Radiochemistry: An Update. Bioconjug. Chem. 2023, 11, 4050–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Edelmann, M.R.; Bredack, C.; Belli, S.; Mohr, P.; Imhoff, M.-P.; Reggiani, F.; Kusznir, E.A.; Rufer, A.C.; Holt, D.P.; Valentine, H.; et al. Evaluation of Tetrazine Tracers for Pretargeted Imaging within the Central Nervous System. Bioconjug. Chem. 2023, 34, 1882–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bredack, C.; Edelmann, M.R.; Borroni, E.; Gobbi, L.C.; Honer, M. Antibody-Based In Vivo Imaging of Central Nervous System Targets-Evaluation of a Pretargeting Approach Utilizing a TCO-Conjugated Brain Shuttle Antibody and Radiolabeled Tetrazines. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Handula, M.; Chen, K.T.; Seimbille, Y. IEDDA: An Attractive Bioorthogonal Reaction for Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Loktev, A.; Lindner, T.; Mier, W.; Debus, J.; Altmann, A.; Jager, D.; Giesel, F.; Kratochwil, C.; Barthe, P.; Roumestand, C.; et al. A Tumor-Imaging Method Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 1423–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jansen, K.; Heirbaut, L.; Verkerk, R.; Cheng, J.D.; Joossens, J.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Lambeir, A.M.; De Meester, I.; Augustyns, K.; et al. Extended structure-activity relationship and pharmacokinetic investigation of (4-quinolinoyl)glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP). J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 3053–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jansen, K.; Heirbaut, L.; Cheng, J.D.; Joossens, J.; Ryabtsova, O.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Lambeir, A.M.; De Meester, I.; Augustyns, K.; et al. Selective Inhibitors of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) with a (4-Quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine Scaffold. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jovcevska, I.; Muyldermans, S. The Therapeutic Potential of Nanobodies. BioDrugs 2020, 34, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pleiner, T.; Bates, M.; Trakhanov, S.; Lee, C.T.; Schliep, J.E.; Chug, H.; Bohning, M.; Stark, H.; Urlaub, H.; Gorlich, D. Nanobodies: Site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope-mapping and native protein complex isolation. Elife 2015, 4, e11349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, K.-T. Novel Imaging Probes: From Design to Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16101506

AMA Style

Chen K-T. Novel Imaging Probes: From Design to Applications. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(10):1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16101506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Kuo-Ting. 2023. "Novel Imaging Probes: From Design to Applications" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 10: 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16101506

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop