Next Article in Journal
Highly Robust Adaptive Sliding Mode Trajectory Tracking Control of Autonomous Vehicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Deep Learning Approach for the Localization and Analysis of Surface Plasmon Scattering
Previous Article in Journal
Convolutional Model with a Time Series Feature Based on RSSI Analysis with the Markov Transition Field for Enhancement of Location Recognition
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

“Grafting-To” Covalent Binding of Plasmonic Nanoparticles onto Silica WGM Microresonators: Mechanically Robust Single-Molecule Sensors and Determination of Activation Energies from Single-Particle Events

Sensors 2023, 23(7), 3455; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23073455
by Mariana P. Serrano 1,*, Sivaraman Subramanian 2, Catalina von Bilderling 1, Matías Rafti 1 and Frank Vollmer 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(7), 3455; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23073455
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 27 February 2023 / Accepted: 20 March 2023 / Published: 25 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Mariana P. Serrano et al. had reported an interesting work entitled “Grafting-to covalent binding of plasmonic nanoparticles onto silica WGM microresonators: mechanically robust single-molecule sensors and determination of activation energies from single-particle events”. For publication, the following important questions need to be addressed.

1.      The authors did not provide a detailed interpretation of Fig. 3. What does linear increase mean? What does the larger slope of the event rates for Δκ mean?

 

2.      The authors should provide an interpretation for the histograms in Figure 4. Please unify the x-axis range in Figure 4 to avoid misunderstandings for the reader. Please increase the font size of the characters in Figure 4 for readability.

 

3.      The authors estimated the deviation between the experimental and calculated values in Fig. 5. For the understanding of the reader, the authors should provide a more detailed explanation of the causes of the deviation. (Possible questions) (1) What are the probable causes of the spike rate increase? (2) What realistic factors are difficult to include in calculations?   

Author Response

see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript reports the realization of an innovative biosensor that exploits the properties of gold nanoparticles. To this end, gold nanorods are selected for their high sensitivity to the change in the surrounding medium. After a suitable biofunctionalization, AuNRs are used to detect complementary oligonucleotides. After that, silica microspheres are used as micro resonator-based platforms. The manuscript is fascinating, and the experiments are well-detailed. However, several concerns need to be addressed:

 

  1. The spectral characterization of the step-by-step functionalization needs to be reported. It is mandatory to show the plasmonic shift and ensure that AuNRs preserve the plasmonic shapes.
  2. The AFM topography is not sufficient. I suggest adding high-resolution TEM
  3. A similar approach has already been reported by Petronella and coworkers (https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/EN/D2EN00564F). I suggest discussing the differences between the two systems.
  4. It would be exciting to discuss if the realized systems have intriguing photo-thermal properties. I suggest looking at the work published by N. Halas and coworkers, F. Frantellizzi and coworkers, A. El-Sayed and coworkers.
  5. The conclusion paragraph needs more details and emphasis.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have presented a novel and feasible procedure for covalent attachment of PNPs onto silica WGM microresonators.

Is that possible to characterize such system after “grafting-to” approach? How to determine the “grafting-to” products?

As the title mentions "plasmonic", is that the present experiments utilize this advantage?

In addition, for the experimental results, could the authors make comparasions with reported systems to show the advatages.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised version has been deemed suitable for publication in Sensors.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for her/his helpfull suggestions, and we think the overall quality of the paper was enhanced after revisions made. 

Reviewer 2 Report

In my opinion, points 2 and 4 need to be addressed. 

Author Response

Please see document attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop