Next Article in Journal
The Loss-Function of KNL1 Causes Oligospermia and Asthenospermia in Mice by Affecting the Assembly and Separation of the Spindle through Flow Cytometry and Immunofluorescence
Next Article in Special Issue
A Fusion-Assisted Multi-Stream Deep Learning and ESO-Controlled Newton–Raphson-Based Feature Selection Approach for Human Gait Recognition
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Outlet Shape of an Air Circulation System for Reduction of Indoor Temperature Difference
Previous Article in Special Issue
Semi-Supervised Adversarial Auto-Encoder to Expedite Human Activity Recognition
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Vision-Based HAR in UAV Videos Using Histograms and Deep Learning Techniques

Sensors 2023, 23(5), 2569; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052569
by Sireesha Gundu and Hussain Syed *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2023, 23(5), 2569; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052569
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 17 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 25 February 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper proposes an interesting approach for detection from UAV videos. However, it requires several revisions before publication. Below are my specific comments. 

1. Abstract is problematic in terms of English and does not include quantitative research findings.

2. Introduction lacks proper referencing. Several paragraphs of information without citation. 

3. Authors did not discuss the effect of rescaling process in Section 5.2. There is an obvious distortion of objects as can be seen in Figure 3 and 4 etc.

4. Figure 17 replicates Table 3 and also gray-level coloring of the bars makes it difficult to understand. So FÄ°gure 17 removal is advised.

5. As Authors compared their architecture with several object detection models, a figure which also includes the results from other models is required (a visual comparison where your model succeed and others failed, etc).

6. Possible limitations and future research possibilities should be discussed. Actually paper needs a comprehensive and separate discussion section.

7. Conclusion should be rewritten to reflect what significant findings are achieved compared to state-of-the-art and provide quantitative results. 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Please find the attached file for your reference. Please update the paper based on the comments and resubmit it.

Regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised version satisfies all the concerns that I raised in previous version. Revisions are solid and improved the quality of the paper. I recommend a full check of English

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for addressing all my comments and I don't have any further concerns.

Regards 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

The authors would like to thank the reviewer for his extraordinary efforts in terms of detailed review and constructive comments. With all his comments and suggestions, the quality of the paper has been enhanced a lot. Once again thanks for approving our revisions for the publication of the article.

 

Back to TopTop