Next Article in Journal
Experimental Analysis of Handcart Pushing and Pulling Safety in an Industrial Environment by Using IoT Force and EMG Sensors: Relationship with Operators’ Psychological Status and Pain Syndromes
Next Article in Special Issue
A PVDF Receiver for Acoustic Monitoring of Microbubble-Mediated Ultrasound Brain Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerated PARAFAC-Based Channel Estimation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted MISO Systems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development of a Broadband (100–240 MHz) Surface Acoustic Wave Emitter Devoted to the Non-Destructive Characterization of Sub-Micrometric Thin Films

Sensors 2022, 22(19), 7464; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197464
by Marc Duquennoy *, Nikolay Smagin, Tahar Kadi, Mohammadi Ouaftouh and Frédéric Jenot
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Sensors 2022, 22(19), 7464; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197464
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 1 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Ultrasound Transducers)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

There are many corrections that must be done by the authors. I have included all comments in the marked/commented manuscript as attached.

I also found four (04) self-citations which require further attention of the editors.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment:

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please reconsider the title of the paper. Interdigital transducers (IDTs) are well known as the effective structures for excitation and detection of surface acoustic waves (SAWs) of different types. The mentioned frequencies 100-240 MHz have been high 20 years ago. It would by much better to focus on description of deposited surface layer tests results treating the IDT and SAW as tools only. SAW related phenomena are well known but nondestructive surface testings are still interesting. The part of the paper devoted to the measurements results are very valuable, in my opinion (especially Fig. 4).

Please take into consideration that Rayleigh waves are one of several different types of surface acoustic waves. The sentence "Surface acoustic waves (SAW), also called Rayleigh waves,[...]" perpetuates only colloquial nomenclature.

A broadband IDT you show in Fig.1 is called in the literature "dispersive transducer". Usually the term "broadband IDT" is used for very short IDTs.

Please use italic fonts and correct subscripts close to the formula A(V).

The conclusions (and whole article) should be focused on measurement results of surface thin layer. The IDTs and SAWs properties are well known for several decades.

Author Response

Please see the attachment:

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Generation of SAW with IDTs is a common practice in implementing SAW filters  (ghost image rejection, convolvers, matched filters..) up to 3 GHz. Please see the website below. This manuscript, however has some interesting contributions to SAW surface displacement imaging. I would change the title to "Real-time imaging of SAW Generated Surface displacement..." and would remove "effective" and "interdigital transducers" since those are known for more than 70 years.

https://www.golledge.com/products/saw-filters-from-golledge-electronics/c-26/c-81?gclid=Cj0KCQjw08aYBhDlARIsAA_gb0cGkrvsrMIbNF-uVxFBU81RAySAezRQfVhYHJCF7R6LisKWAuUvqpMaAqtgEALw_wcB

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment:

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you very mauch for the changes. Now the topic and content of the paper fit together. 

Author Response

Thank you very much for reviewing our paper.

Back to TopTop