Next Article in Journal
A Review of Vision-Laser-Based Civil Infrastructure Inspection and Monitoring
Next Article in Special Issue
An Intelligent Automated System for Detecting Malicious Vehicles in Intelligent Transportation Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Development of an Adaptive Computer-Aided Soft Sensor Diagnosis System for Assessment of Executive Functions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Efficiency Optimization for SWIPT-Enabled IoT Network with Energy Cooperation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Communication Technologies for Interoperable Smart Microgrids in Urban Energy Community: A Broad Review of the State of the Art, Challenges, and Research Perspectives

by
Gogulamudi Pradeep Reddy
,
Yellapragada Venkata Pavan Kumar
and
Maddikera Kalyan Chakravarthi
*
School of Electronics Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravati 522237, Andhra Pradesh, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(15), 5881; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155881
Submission received: 7 July 2022 / Revised: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 6 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Grids and Green Communications)

Abstract

:
In modern urban energy communities, diverse natured loads (homes, schools, hospitals, malls, etc.) are situated in the same locality and have self-electricity generation/management facilities. The power systems of these individual buildings are called smart microgrids. Usually, their self-electricity generation is based on renewable energy sources, which are uncertain due to their environmental dependency. So, the consistency of self-energy generation throughout the day is not guaranteed; thus, the dependency on the central utility grid is continued. To solve this, researchers have recently started working on interoperable smart microgrids (ISMs) for urban communities. Here, a central monitoring and control station captures the energy generation/demand information of each microgrid and analyzes the availability/requirement, thereby executing the energy transactions among these ISMs. Such local energy exchanges among the ISMs reduce the issues with uncertain renewable energy and the dependency on the utility grid. To establish such useful ISMs, a well-established communication mechanism has to be adopted. In this view, this paper first reviews various state-of-the-art developments related to smart grids and then provides extensive insights into communication standards and technologies, issues/challenges, and future research perspectives for ISM implementation. Finally, a discussion is presented on advanced wireless technology, called LoRa (Long Range), and a modern architecture using the LoRa technology to establish a communication network for ISMs is proposed.

1. Introduction

Present-day challenges in the energy sector, such as rising electricity generation prices, losses in energy transmission, fossil fuel depletion, environmental concerns, poor efficiency, higher installation cost/time, etc., have motivated the search for alternative and local power generation systems. Further, the unrelenting growth of urbanization in the energy sector has greatly increased the utility grid burden, which causes frequent grid outages. All of these factors have laid a path for the deployment of distributed energy systems to reduce the dependency on the utility grid. So, the traditional central utility grid is supplemented with renewable energy-based local generating plants [1]. Renewable energy can be integrated at the substation level (usually large in terms of capacity) or building level (usually with a small capacity) in the power system, as shown in Figure 1 [2]. These kinds of micro-level power generation capacities using the renewable energy sources that are connected to buildings at the distribution voltage level are called “microgrids” [3]. Further, a steady change in the expectations and comforts of electricity consumers day-by-day demands the system to be more responsive.
Thus, these microgrids are presently evolving as intelligent local grids, called “smart microgrids”. These provide unique features to the electricity consumers, such as demand-side management by peak load curtailment or shaving, deregulated marketing (dynamic pricing options with real-time trading), forecasting for contingency readiness, demand response, outage management, energy conservation, energy efficiency enhancement, etc. [4]. To maximize the efficiency and productivity of a smart microgrid, the integration of various components in and around a building plays an important role [5]. These include various types of energy sources, loads and service equipment, monitoring and safety systems, and maintenance systems, as shown in Figure 2, where information can be exchanged through wired or wireless communication. However, the intermittent behavior of renewable energy sources lessens the fruitfulness of the microgrids by complicating their responses to real-time loading.

1.1. Need and Opportunity for the ISMs

Microgrids are ecologically clean and green, deregulated, and decentralized, and can reduce the burden on the utility grid if they are operated reliably. However, these systems possess unsteady generation capacities due to the dependency on uncertain environmental factors. Due to the unstable nature of the microgrids, central power grid outages have continued. In such scenarios, the integrated/combined operation of multiple smart microgrids in a locality (named ISMs—interoperable smart microgrids) allows well-thought-out contact between suppliers and customers, which enables their operating approaches to be both more versatile and sophisticated.
On the other hand, during the early days of urbanization, urban communities were formed by a group of homogeneous buildings (buildings with similar load profiles), so they cannot share energy sources among themselves. However, there is a paradigm shift in the modern urbanization scenario: communities are forming through heterogeneous buildings (buildings with diverse load profiles), such as those of industries, apartments, hospitals, universities, markets, malls, theatres, etc. As all these buildings may not have the same load at any one time, these new formations make it possible to share resources. This is a new opportunity that needs to be adapted by researchers to interoperate various microgrids to enhance their fruitfulness. However, the major challenge lies in finding an optimal unit commitment strategy to economically dispatch the generated energy various microgrids [6].
Additionally, the modern smart grid initiatives suggest including various features such as central monitoring and control unit (CMCU) operations, demand response, effective generation-load balancing (energy management), ICT (information and communication technology) for continuous data monitoring and effective data processing, forecasting for contingency readiness, emergency alerting, etc.
Hence, to address the abovementioned issues and to match the requirements of modern smart grid initiatives, this paper proposes the implementation of ISMs in an urban energy community. This interoperable or integral operation in a locality can enhance energy availability and generation capability. This provides a new opportunity to effectively address the issues of microgrid deployment as the generated energy can be collectively utilized rather than utilized alone. Further, this local management of available energy can reduce the dependency on the utility grid energy.

1.2. Problem Statement and Article Structure

There are some review papers published in the literature that discuss various aspects of smart grids’ development. Table 1 summarizes all such works.
From these works, it is understood that most of the research work focuses on smart grids; few have addressed microgrids. Additionally, few works have discussed the standalone communication technologies, which can help us understand the communication concepts. So, it is evident that ISM-based analysis has not been conducted so far. For this purpose, this paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the state-of-the-art developments, insights into communication standards, technologies, and issues/challenges present in ISM deployment. This paper also discusses key future research perspectives followed by a proposed ISM architecture using LoRa (Long Range) technology. All of these are covered in various sections of the paper, as shown in Figure 3.

2. Comprehensive Review of Various State-of-the-Art Developments

This section discusses the worldwide footprint of smart distribution grids and initiatives in the Indian power sector, along with a review of research works related to both the macrogrid and microgrid levels.

2.1. Worldwide Footprint of Smart Distribution Grids

Smart distribution grids are evolving as a potential power system composition in many countries, created by integrating renewable energy resources into the utility grid. Some of the recent projects are: CFCL BlueGENs UK grid, Ecogrid Project, ERIGrid, Smart Power Hamburg Project, Danish Edison Project, Samso, Ei Hierro, GRID4U, and Power Matching City Projects (in Europe); Toyota city project, Kitakyushu city project, and Hanian (in Asia); PRICE, STAmi, ISOLVES: PSSA-M, ELECTRA, Smart Grid, Hyllie, Model City, Manheim, Vendee, Nice Grid, e-GOTHAM, Arrowhead, and NINES [10,14]. Apart from these, many other countries have also started or deployed smart grid projects. Table 2 gives a summary of all such worldwide initiatives.

2.2. Initiatives in the Indian Power Sector

Apart from the projects mentioned above, there are several other projects related to the smart grid being implemented across India as given in Table 3. Importantly, the Govt. of India approved 14 Smart Grid pilot projects in India. The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) is working towards having a solar installed capacity of 100GW by 2030 and 200GW by 2050 [2].

2.3. Review of Research Works—Macrogrid Level

This section presents various key works in the literature related to macrogrid communications, which are summarized in Table 4. IEEE 802.15.4g is an important standard for Smart Utility Communications Networks (SUN). This standard helps to establish a common set of rules over the globe for the interoperability of smart grids. This is a PHY layer and three modulation techniques MR (multi-rate and multi-regional)-FSK, MR-OQPSK and MR-OFDM are discussed. Frame formats help us understand IEEE 802.15.4e amendments, which is a MAC layer. There are two types of information elements (IEs) defined in 802.15.4e, header information elements and payload information elements. To have a complete Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), completing the design of PHY and MAC layers is essential. However, this is limited to the outline of standard descriptions such as PHY 4g and MAC 4e [42].
State-of-the-art communications infrastructure, concerns and applications in the smart grid are described in [43]. A comparison table between the existing grid and the smart grid is made, demonstrating the importance of the smart grid. Nearly 75 standards are available for the building infrastructure of smart grids. The ability of WSNs (wireless sensor networks) to facilitate the realization of the smart grid is also discussed [43]. Three major challenges are addressed: guaranteeing uniform interoperability, cognitive accessibility to unlicensed radio spectra and cybersecurity. In summary, WSNs, wireless communication technologies, challenges in interoperability, unlicensed radio spectra, and cybersecurity are discussed.
The SGIRM (smart grid interoperability reference model) is a conceptual smart grid architecture model [44] and is described in three aspects: (1) electrical; (2) communications; and (3) IT. The level of assurance in communication links is also classified as Tier 1 (critical), Tier 2 (important), and Tier 3 (informative). It highlights the idea of a Unified Key Management Function (UKMF). Security and key management issues are discussed. However, there are many standards on interoperability to be covered. Energy management plays a significant role in the electric distribution network [45]. The data stream of each intelligent energy management (IEM) can be in any of the three modes, i.e., the direct transmission mode, traditional relaying mode and D2D-assisted relaying mode. An architecture using D2D communication along with the relaying techniques is presented in [45]. This minimizes the overall rate of information loss and peak bandwidth demand for latency-sensitive smart grid communications. However, some assumptions were made around relay nodes and base stations, which may affect the efficacy of the system.
One of the smart grid’s major advantages is bidirectional communication [46]. Communication between different deployed smart meters and a gateway is very crucial. Malicious users could potentially access the data. Thus, a lightweight authenticated communication (LAC) scheme ensures safe data transmission between smart meters and gateways. The LAC has lower storage and communication costs and achieves confidentiality, honesty, authentication in real time, and attack–resistance replay.
Different communication technologies (wired and wireless) (PLC, DSL, optical communication, ZigBee, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, GSM, Sigfox, Narrowband-Internet of things (NB-IoT), LoRa, etc.) are discussed [14]. These can be used in the context of smart grids with an emphasis on smart metering LV applications. Various smart meter projects around Europe are also discussed. Nevertheless, initiatives based on the MV smart grid have not been discussed.
The potential of WSNs (wireless sensor networks) is utilized for smart girds [47]. The presented Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) is used to gather smart meter data. The data flow is from a house with a wireless automatic meter reading (WAMR) to a bus stop and these data are transmitted to the bus. However, the smart meter should have IEEE 802.11p compatibility and houses should be within 1000 m of the bus stop.
In communications, the spectrum plays a significant role. The utilization and reuse of the available spectrum are very crucial. A new approach for the sharing of the spectrum in smart grids is addressed in [48]. Applications are categorized into three types: Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3. The throughput is increased by the suggested application class (priority-based communication strategy). To explain this concept, a case study of the IEEE 14-bus power grid is also mentioned. However, the distance was not given importance, which may influence the proposed method.
National power utility company (PLN), Bali, has recently introduced Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) by replacing traditional meters with smart meters [49]. Different LPWAN technologies (Sigfox, NB-IoT, and LoRa) were discussed to collect data from smart meters. The PLN Bali sends a request to the regulator to use Sigfox or NB-IoT as a telecommunications provider. LoRaWAN is used as a solution to collect the data from the houses in the 1000 m radius. PLN could achieve a 100% success rate. However, detailed metrics for the actual data are not described.
The smart sensor can supply real-time data and the grid status for multiple operations [50]. The integration of these smart sensors for smart grids plays an important role in interoperability. The general model of smart sensors for smart grids is discussed. PMU-based and MU-based smart sensors are also described. Various interfacing standards such as IEEE 1815, IEC 61850-9-2 and 61869-9, IEEE C37.118, and IEEE 1451 are discussed. An interoperability test system was developed for PMU-based smart sensors, and testing was carried out. This requires high-accuracy timing and time synchronization.
NB-IoT is one of the latest technologies in the area of LPWAN, and works in a licensed band (country-specific) [51]. With NB-IoT, the desired features, such as being long-range, low power, and high capacity, can be achieved. A high Quality of service (QoS) can be achieved with NB-IoT, whereas it is usually difficult to achieve with other technologies. Qualitative metrics (security, scalability, flexibility, and availability) and quantitative metrics (latency, frequency range, reliability, and data rate) are also discussed. With these metrics, it was concluded that NB-IoT is a useful technology, but it is costlier for real-time deployment as it requires a proprietary license and large infrastructure.
The importance of wireless communication technologies (especially LoRa) in establishing communication between smart grids is discussed in [52]. Path loss, the shadowing effect, and multipath fading are also discussed. Further, a formula was derived for calculating the distance between the transmitter and receiver. Here, the work is two-fold: one is a theoretical approach and the other is a practical approach. The authors used 4 transmission parameters, 2 environmental parameters, and 1 parameter for randomness to calculate the distance. In earlier works, researchers mainly focused on the spreading factor (typically between 7 and 12) as an important parameter which affects the performance of LoRa. However, from the results given in [52], it was concluded that distance, obstacles, and noise are the three most significant factors affecting the performance of LoRa technologies. However, only a few parameters were considered while designing the wireless channel. Further, Saleh Valenzuela channel modelling can be applied and optimum node placement can be focused on.
In smart grid communications, the security threat to data can be from insiders or outsiders [53]. An investigation was previously conducted on various possible security insider threats and the possible solutions were summarized. In addition, a novel hybrid insider threats model was also proposed. However, the construction of rules has to be more detailed.
ICT (Information and communications technology) is very important for smart grids [9]. The major architectural issues, key technologies and infrastructure requirements in smart grids are discussed. The importance of the cloud is also detailed. Various standards such as IEEE, IEC, NIST, ANSI, ITU-T, and SAE are discussed. Future directions using Software-defined networking (SDN), network virtualization, network coding and 5G networks are listed along with the discussion on PHY and application layers.

2.4. Review of Research Works—Microgrid Level

The following are the various literature works conducted on microgrid communications. All the key points are summarized in Table 5. The integration of distributed generation units to the conventional grids can tremendously increase the performance of the grids. However, at the same time, this integration may have an impact on the structure of the grid. The use of microgrids is the better solution in this case. A microgrid is a combination of loads, local generations (typically renewable sources), controllers, protection and management systems [18]. Various projects in Europe, Japan, Korea, North America and Australia are detailed. However, there are very few works available on microgrid protection and energy management systems.
Jordon is a developing country with a very small population of around 97 lakhs, and 96% of the nation’s energy originates from oil and gas imports from other countries [54]. Jordon experiences strong global radiation, 2080 kWh/m2, with over 300 sunny days in a year. Jordan can make use of solar energy to produce electricity. The concept of a local area grid is discussed, which is to have a single source of power generation (PV) and distribute the energy within the apartments/households that exist in the same building/community. This system consists of four major components: (1) solar panels, (2) inverter, (3) batteries (optional) and (4) intelligent power distribution and control unit (IPDC). This solution provides low-income households with the ability to share the cost of installation while substantially reducing energy bills. Further, various technological advancements in microgrid communications are discussed in [55]. State-of-the-art and future developments are summarized as well. Internet Protocol suite, DNP3, Modbus, IEC 61850 and different wired and wireless physical links are mentioned.
The microgrids operating in a particular environment should operate at the same frequency [56]. If the frequency produced by the grids is different, then there may be a chance of damaging the load. The establishment of frequency synchronization between the grids is discussed by representing each grid as a Linear time-invariant (LTI) system. To accomplish this, a consensus algorithm based on a cooperative control strategy is used. Similarly, the purpose of the research of [57] is to restore the frequency of hybrid lossy microgrids (using a distributed secondary control algorithm). The distributed communication network under consideration has time-varying delays in communication. A stable Lyapunov–Krasovskii analysis methodology is used for the study.
Communication between various distributed generation units in a microgrid is established using Zigbee technology [58]. Each unit has a local controller in addition to the central controller at the microgrid level. The advantage of Zigbee is its low cost and low power consumption, but it works at a very low data rate. To reduce the number of transactions, a data management scheme was proposed. The local (primary) controller, central controller, and network tertiary controller are also discussed. Communication delay is considered one of the important metrics to explain this concept. It is expected for a microgrid to operate in two modes: standalone mode and grid-connected mode [59]. The goal is to incorporate communication and control to facilitate the transition from the standalone to grid-connected mode. The authors presented a security scheme for this purpose and the performance is compared with those of the Rivest–Shamir–Adleman (RSA), Digital signature algorithm (DSA), and Time Valid Hash to Obtain Random Subsets (TV-HORS).
The primary focus of [15] is to review the state-of-the-art research on the microgrids in both islanded mode and grid-connected mode. Reliability, resiliency, and power quality are discussed as the key parameters. Further, various economic issues and other elements of the microgrids are outlined. Further, a review of different architectures (IEEE-1547, ISA-95, NISA, and IEC-61850) was presented in [16]. Some of the key challenges such as the lack of awareness and clarity, technical challenges, etc., are emphasized. Additionally, various retrofitted architectures and topologies to improve the clarity of presentation and perception of architecture IEEE-1547 and redundant architecture to improve the network consistency of the IEC-61850 architecture were discussed.
Distribution system automation using ICT is introduced as a resolution that incorporates all of a distribution system’s essential constituents [60]. The evolution of the automation perspective in needs and technology was discussed. Different sub-systems are listed as process improvement and decision support systems, process optimization systems, communication networks, database management and maintenance systems, and process control and safety systems. The home energy management network (HEMS) plays a major role in the smart grid [61]. There were several problems with the traditional HEMS, such as scalability, reusability, etc. Further, a dynamic home area network (DHAN) is proposed which is an IoT-based HEMS. Unlike traditional gateways, here, a nomadic agent is used to achieve this dynamic nature. Through the experiments, the suggested method could achieve energy savings.
The installation of a microgrid in Griffith University’s N44 building is discussed in [62]. The communication architecture and data acquisition mechanism were discussed. The communication protocols used were Modbus and TCP/IP. Python was used to access the data and to make them available on the cloud. The use of various hardware components (SunnyBoy Webbox, RedLion data logger, power meters, etc.) was discussed. Similarly, various views of distributed resource system architectures (architectural view, requirements view, conceptual view, concurrency view, and network view) are discussed in [17]. The analysis and refining process were conducted in compliance with the guidelines of IEEE 1547.3TM-2007. Various game theory approaches (cooperative, non-cooperative, one shot, etc.) were used to establish energy-sharing mechanisms within the households in a selected microgrid (in Stockholm) [63]. Utility is a key metric to quantify a household’s payoff from playing a game. The distributed algorithm and Gale–Shapley algorithm are used to establish power-sharing between households. The benefits of this approach are presented in terms of cost savings and emission reductions.
The microgrid consists of three types of power converters, namely, grid-feeding, grid-supporting, and grid-forming power converters. In island mode, these converters should maintain the voltage and frequency in the desired range [64]. A microgrid central controller achieves synchronization in grid-forming power converters. Noise and the synchronization signal delay play a significant role, and can also lead to a quality loss in the grid-forming power converters. The RS-485 communication protocol is used to implement the system. Further, to achieve robustness, the FM signal is used as a synchronization signal. During extreme events (flood, earthquake, hurricane, etc.), the healing time of a microgrid, which is called resilience, is very important. One should have a thorough knowledge of microgrids from end to end to help in this situation. So, the management of networked microgrids for riding through extreme events is essential. In this view, community resilience microgrids are used to share the energy generated by their sources within a community [12,65]. Though it can be used in normal operating conditions, it has great impact in emergency situations. The unique operational characteristics of these microgrids are also presented. Electricity ethnography (a three-month analysis) was conducted at an off-grid village in rural India (1 February–30 April 2016)) [66]. This report discussed how social relations and diverse cultural values influence the exchange of energy between village households. Two types of energy exchanges (energy-sharing and energy-trading) are discussed. The integration of four microgrids with the help of the Internet, i.e., cloud-based service (SaaS), is discussed in [67]. The individual components of the microgrid are connected (IEEE 802.11s-based mesh network) and all these are connected to a gateway. All four gateways are connected to the cloud platform with the implementation of IEC61850 GOOSE messages. Further, a bilevel distributed optimization algorithm was developed using LabVIEW and NS-3.
The design and modelling of intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) based on IEC61850 are discussed for various forms of distributed energy resources [68]. The modelling of IEDs for PV plants, battery systems, diesel plants, wind turbines and controllable loads is discussed. Additionally, the communication services (GOOSE, SV, etc.) are also presented through a real-time system-in-the-loop simulation. Additionally, a review on ICT for microgrids is given in [11]. An evaluation of microgrids, from natural microgrids to dynamic microgrids, was conducted and further suggested using a peer-to-peer communication approach for next-generation microgrids. Similarly, ref. [69] focuses on developing the communication models of solar home systems and smart meters based on the IEC 61850 standards. Simulations are run with a riverbed modeller to evaluate performance. The packet loss of different messages, ETE delay, etc., are discussed. Similarly, a comparison of a P2P (peer-to-peer) energy-sharing mechanism with P2G (peer-to-grid) trading was discussed in [70]. In P2G trading, when the electricity production is higher than the load, the excess PV energy is first used to charge the battery, while in P2P, the excess energy is first used to supply the neighbors in need. The P2P-sharing community contains three types of players: ESC (energy-sharing coordinator), prosumer and consumer. The suggested system is implemented in three stages: (i) two-stage aggregated control (CNLP optimization and control based on rules); (ii) P2P trading; and (iii) assessment. By using assessment metrics such as self-consumption, self-sufficiency, and energy cost, it was concluded that P2P leads to better results than P2G.
A microgrid can be one of three types, DC, AC, or hybrid (AC-DC), depending on the main bus voltage linking [71]. Various schemes, viz., centralized communication-based control, distributed communication-based control, and voltage droop control, is discussed. The use of ICT and allowable latency for different wireless technologies is mentioned. Further, various components of microgrid communication, namely, wired (optical fiber communication, telephone network communication, twisted pair/coaxial cable, and power-line communication) and wireless (GPRS, LAN, Wi-Max, and Zigbee) technologies are discussed in [72]. Various types of networks are discussed, such as consumer premises area networks (CPAN), home area networks (HAN), building area networks (BAN), industrial area networks (IAN), neighborhood area networks (NAN), and wide area networks (WAN). Various metrics are also listed (network latency, reliability, security, and time synchronization). In these networks, a consensus algorithm-based communication system was employed.
LoRa technology can be used in large outdoor/indoor areas such as offices, residential buildings, car parks, warehouses, etc., to understand their behavior and performance [73] in both the LoS (line-of-sight) and NLoS (non-line-of-sight) cases. The concepts of the path loss model, shadowing effect, and K-factor for the Rician model are presented. Further, in a multi-micro-grid environment, a deep neural network-based response learning mechanism for distribution system operators was introduced in [74]. These microgrids are linked to the main grid and acquire the power to match their local needs. Additionally, the pricing scheme was accomplished by reinforcement learning using the Monte Carlo method.

3. Insights into Communication Standards and Technologies

As smart microgrids are one of the unique recent developments in the energy sector, their establishment requires a standard process to be followed. Thus, it is very important to understand various standards that contribute to the development of smart microgrids. Various renowned forums or agencies define different standards to be applied globally for the development of smart grids/microgrids. Further, to implement the architecture for the smart microgrid, one must have a detailed knowledge of the various technologies available. In the present-day scenarios, wireless communication technologies are outperforming wired-based solutions by offering advantages, such as mobility, convenience, easy installation, and low cost. All these key standards and technologies are noted in Figure 4, which are explained in the following subsections.

3.1. Standards and Guidelines

Standards provide procedures/detailed descriptions that can be followed universally. Governments and industries all around the world have recognized the importance of standards in the energy sector. Standards help to ensure quality and safety, and facilitate communication. In the absence of standards, it is difficult for manufacturers to design or implement a system which can be utilized globally. The smart grid does not just require a single standard; rather, its implementation will the use of several standards. Various standards and guidelines related to smart grid/microgrid communication are given in Figure 5 [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. Some of the major contributors in this direction are IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization), ITU (International Telecommunication Union), TIA (Telecommunications Industry Association), ANSI (American National Standards Institute), and MultiSpeak.
Usually, the standard documents are lengthy. It is therefore vital to organize these standards in a way that readers can quickly understand and select a standard based on their needs without going through the entire standard document. In this view, Table 6 helps the reader to understand the outline of these standards easily.

3.2. Communication Technologies

To manage complex power systems effectively, information flow across various elements of the network is crucial. The typical connectivity scenario between various players involved in the smart grid is shown in Figure 6. Here, the entire network is built based on a fronthaul network, a backhaul network, and the core network. The fronthaul network connects end-users to the backhaul network. The backhaul network refers to the transmission of a remote signal from the fronthaul network to the central station (in the core network). This network consists of a high-capacity channel, which is capable of transmitting the data at higher data rates. The core network is a global network which interconnects the networks of different locations/systems, providing a path for the information exchange among them.
In the past, there was no communication between the generating station and the end-user. With the advancement of technologies in communication, now, bidirectional communication is possible, and thereby energy can be effectively managed between the generating station and the end-user. When compared to the traditional grid, the smart grid consists of several sensors and actuators. Sensors are used to collect data from various pieces of equipment with the help of controllers. The data can be sent to the server/cloud with the help of communication technologies. The collected data are used to analyze the performance of the equipment. Additionally, the actuators are used to control the grid components effectively. Generally, the system networks can be established in various fashions, such as personal area network (PAN), local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), and wide area network (WAN), based on their distance of coverage, as shown in Figure 7. The PAN is a region where devices are connected within a person’s workspace (shorter distance). The major technologies used in PAN are Bluetooth, Radio-frequency identification (RFID), and Near-field communication (NFC). Bluetooth was developed by Bluetooth Special Interest Group and uses industrial, scientific, and medical bands (2.4 GHz). The latest Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE) technology consumes little power by being in range. This technology is typically used to share files, images, videos, audio files, etc. The RFID technology is used to exchange information between the devices which are in close proximity. This works with the help of a tag and reader, where each tag is equipped with a unique number. This tag can be attached to the object (of desired application), which will be identified by the reader. Some of the applications are FASTag (toll collection system in India), tracking goods in warehouses, etc. NFC is a subset of RFID, but its range is even more limited. It is widely used in contactless credit card swiping and payments via mobile applications.
LAN is a group of interconnected devices that share information in a limited area such as an office, building, school, university campus, etc. The major technologies used in LAN are Zigbee and Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi). Zigbee is a low-cost, low-power wireless network that was designed as an open worldwide standard that works at low data rates. It works on the IEEE 802.15.4 standard and operates at 2.4 GHz. It is widely used in applications such as wireless sensor networks, home automation, etc. On the other hand, Wi-Fi provides higher data rates and coverage when compared to Zigbee but consumes more power. It works on the IEEE 802.11 standard and operates at 2.4/5 GHz. One of the popular applications of Wi-Fi is for accessing the internet. Users can establish a connection with access points, and these access points are connected to the Internet service provider (ISP) in the backend with the help of routers. The MAN is designed to connect the users that are spread across the metropolitan area; here, the coverage is higher. Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) technology is used in MANs. This is a wireless broadband technology that works on the IEEE 802.16 standard. It is used in the applications of smart cities, i.e., to connect various offices, buildings, etc., that are located at multiple locations wirelessly.
The WAN is a communication network that extends the coverage over a large geographic area. The fifth generation of mobile networks, or 5G, is the latest version of the cellular technology that can perform at higher speeds than past generations, 1G, 2G, 3G, and 4G. The first generation, i.e., 1G, was in introduced in 1980s, where basic analog voice services are provided. In 2G, digital technology was used for voice calls (1990s). In 3G, mobile broadband was introduced (2000s), with the aim of providing good internet access, and in 4G, IP-based protocols were used (2010s). Now, 5G has been introduced, the main advantages of which are high speed, high bandwidth, and low latency [83]. This network splits the entire area into small regions known as cells. The cell is covered with the antenna with which all the 5G devices can be connected. The quality of Internet services in busy places can be improved by 5G since it is quicker than current networks and has a greater bandwidth. Further, 5G relies on network slicing, which means that multiple independent networks can use the same physical infrastructure. As this it is in the early stages of development, researchers and companies are working on various prototypes and real-time testing [84]. Additionally, in a few countries, it is already in use.
Mobile-edge computing (MEC) offers execution resources such as storage, computations, etc., close to the users (in a network), that can be utilized to deliver services, as well as store and process the content. Artificial intelligence techniques help to further improve the performance of MEC [85,86]. Fifth-generation and MEC technologies together have the potential to greatly enhance performance and allow the real-time processing of large volumes of data. MEC lowers latency by bringing the processing capabilities closer to the user, while 5G improves speeds. Fifth-generation technology with MEC has created a new opportunity for industries to expand their business. These cellular technologies provide higher data rates but consume more power. LPWAN is a type of WAN designed to cover larger areas with low data rates and operates at low power. The major technologies competing in the LPWAN space are Sigfox, NB-IoT, and LoRa. Sigfox is a global network operator that connects various low-power devices, and here the downlinks are very limited. NB-IoT is developed by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) standard and operates in licensed bands. It uses a Long-Term Evolution (LTE) standard by limiting the bandwidth, whereas LoRa enables the devices to connect with bidirectional communication and operates at the unlicensed band. An individual can build a LoRa network without depending on the network operator. This means that the LoRa concept is adopted for most of the applications in LPWANs.
All these technologies can be arranged as shown in Figure 8 with respect to the range of their coverage and data rate support. Thus, based on the application requirements, suitable communication technology has to be selected.
The spectrum plays an important role in wireless communications as it is expensive and should be utilized effectively. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the major player in allocating the bands globally. Out of all the frequency bands, some bands are left open, which means the user need not take any approval to utilize these bands. These are called “industrial, scientific and medical” bands. These bands are given by ITU radio regulations, as given in Table 7. Additionally, users must follow the regulations set by the national/local government bodies (some bands may differ from the global perspective).

4. Issues and Challenges in the Implementation of ISMs

Electrical energy is a most demanded commodity across the globe which can cater for the needs of all sections of economical, industrial, and domestic sectors. So, it is expected to be easily accessible and readily available as per the requirements. However, many parts of the world still do not have the access to the grid. Further, the grid outages and uncertain renewable energy sources enhance the issue of energy availability. As a solution to these issues, ISMs are evolving worldwide.
These systems are expected to have functionalities/features such as effective generation-load balancing, economic load dispatch and unit commitment, robust communication infrastructure for parameter sensing and transmission, CMCU with data analytics and contingency estimations, decision and control operations for economic resource management, demand response, and advanced information technology solutions for effective data processing. However, many parameters have to be considered and issues/challenges need to be addressed for fruitful ISM deployment [8,87,88]. All these are depicted in Figure 9 and are summarized in Table 8.

5. Research Perspectives

Though various works have been carried out on the implementation of ISMs, there is still much scope to increase the performance of these networks [9,10,11,89,90]. In this view, this section presents various possible research directions. All the possibilities are broken up into eight directions, as shown in Figure 10. These are outlined as general perspectives and emphasize LPWAN.

5.1. General Perspectives

As the ISMs are an emerging consideration for modern smart grids, it is required to adopt various advanced and highly efficient technologies and engineering concepts for their betterment. In this view, this section outlines the general perspective of using various technologies/concepts as follows:
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Networks: Peer-to-peer networks are still in the basic stages of development for use in microgrids, and further research is required. To establish the electrical exchange between peers in the community, robust communication is essential. In case of central monitoring station failures, peers can connect with each other without depending on a separate server. The study of microgrid dynamics is becoming more sophisticated as electrical systems become more complex and unpredictable, posing new challenges that must be addressed.
Data Analytics: Data analytics is a powerful tool that helps to take the effective decisions in the operations. Having data alone cannot solve the purpose unless its analyzed. Users can benefit from data analytics due to the increased significance and the vast amounts of knowledge it generates. With the analysis of data, ISMs can find new opportunities. This results in wiser decisions, more effective operations, and more profits, which in turn helps in reducing the overall cost.
Data Compatibility: Compatibility refers to the ability of systems to work together without requiring any modifications. An increasing number of renewable energy sources, loads and their integration to the microgrid generates varieties of data which requires advances in high-performance computing for computations. As a result, data compatibility is anticipated to be an important aspect in the deployment of ISMs. Additionally, another research aspect is defining the globally compatible communication protocols that can handle various data formats.
LPWAN Technologies: These technologies are modern and advanced wireless communication technologies which provide wide-area coverage with massive volumes and offer low data rates. These technologies are emerging and offer solutions to the problems in IoT applications. Typically, these networks consume low power and in most cases they are battery-powered. Some of the popular technologies used in LPWAN are Sigfox, NB-IoT, and LoRa. As these are new technologies, the usage and applicability of these technologies for the establishment of ISMs have to be explored in greater detail.
AI and ML Applications: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) concepts can assist ISMs in building a robust communication network by learning from their previous actions and making better decisions. The algorithms influence the parameters such as channel bandwidth, antenna sensitivity, and spectrum monitoring. The backhaul network performance can also be further improved with the help of novel algorithms. Further, AI and ML concepts can be used for renewable energy resource forecasting, loading uncertainty estimation, cyber-attack prediction, the predictive maintenance of the ISMs, predicting channel behavior, predicting packet losses and network collisions, etc. Some of the latest and key applications of AI and ML in power grids are mentioned in Table 9.
Spectrum Sharing: To make the overall communication system effective, the spectrum is one of the important aspects that needs to be managed carefully. If the system is not able to utilize the available spectrum (or part of the spectrum is not utilized), it is a huge loss. In such scenarios, spectrum sharing helps to enable the efficient utilization of the entire frequency spectrum so its full potential can be achieved. With the help of spectrum sharing, the operational cost for the telecom operators will go down, and thereby users can experience better quality and high speeds at a reasonable cost. The advancement in deep reinforcement learning algorithms helps to ensure intelligent spectrum access for users [101,102].
Gateway placement: A judicious deployment of gateways helps to obtain the maximum data at CMCU from several motes in ISMs. The reception of the signals is different in cluttered environments compared to normal scenarios. LOS and NLOS paths play an important role in the reception of signals. Various new algorithms/metrics/methods have to be adopted for determining the best gateway placement in different environments, and thereby the data from the motes can be received at CMCU without any interruptions.
Network Security: The data transfers among the motes and CMCU must take place in a secure environment. Network security safeguards the network infrastructure by preventing a wide range of potential threats from entering or spreading within a network. There is a possibility for the attacker to enter into network/network device (ex: switch) and create a malfunction in the network; thereby, it may lead to an entire network crash. Though there is a lot of research work carried out in the direction of security, attackers are coming with up new methods of attack. So, there is a necessity for researchers to propose new methods/approaches to prevent these new attacks. Furthermore, when developing information-exchange algorithms and protocols, users’ privacy should be prioritised.

5.2. Emphasis on LPWAN

Of the various points mentioned in Section 5.1, LPWAN is an advanced communication network that can meet various communication requirements. In recent years, there has been a huge shift in the market for LPWAN applications. This was proposed to meet the diverse needs of low-power and long-range IoT applications. These applications include smart metering (gas, water, etc.), smart cities, geolocation, asset tracking, etc. Battery-operated devices are used to gather data from different locations. There were several wireless technologies discussed in Section 2 of this paper, in which Zigbee was one of the most widely used conventional technologies for low-data-rate and long-distance communications. However, it cannot achieve coverage in the order of kilometers. To address this, in recent years, many new technologies have been invented for LPWAN.
In view of all these points, smart grid researchers need to understand how these new technologies can help in achieving their goals. With this objective, this subsection describes all such important technologies of LPWAN, viz., Sigfox, NB-IoT and LoRa. These advanced technologies are to be used to develop effective communication in ISMs which operates on different bandwidths and distances. The description of these suggested technologies and their features are given as follows.
Sigfox is a cellular-type network operator founded in 2010, with the objective of connecting devices in the physical world to the digital realm [103]. Currently, Sigfox is providing services in 75 countries. With the recent advancements in technology, people will depend on 5G, which provides very high speeds and bandwidth. The Sigfox 0G network will serve as a safety net and ensure that the devices are always in contact. This was created as a global IoT network, based on low power, long range, and small amounts of data, that provides end-to-end communication. With the help of the lightweight protocols, these devices consume very little power, and thereby devices can operate on battery power for long periods of time. As shown in Figure 11, the devices (sensor nodes) send the data from the remote locations to the Sigfox base stations, and the base stations will forward the data received to the Sigfox cloud. From the cloud, the data can be accessed by the user via the applications. The volume of the data that can be sent to the network (uplink) is 12 bytes (max), whereas the downlink data are restricted to 8 bytes (max).
NB-IoT is a cellular device service technology that is established by the 3GPP for LPWAN. It works in a licensed band and can be developed on top of the existing cellular network infrastructure. It takes the advantage of mobile networks’ security and privacy characteristics. Today’s cellular networks provide high data rates but consume lots of power. On the other hand, NB-IoT allows the transmission of a smaller amount of data at a low data rate. When compared to general cellular networks, NB-IoT offers lower costs and a longer battery life. The three deployment modes for NB-IoT are in-band, guard-band, and standalone [104]. In in-band operation, it uses the frequency of the LTE channel, in guard-band operation it uses the unused guard bands, and in standalone mode, it occupies the GSM channels. The architecture of the NB-IoT network is shown in Figure 12. The function of the NB-IoT network is to send the end node data to the application server. The application server further processes the data and, based on the requirement commands, these can be sent to the end nodes from the application.
LoRa is a proprietary radio modulation technology based on the Chirp Spread Spectrum (CSS), owned by Semtech [105]. It is a PHY layer of the stack. LoRa provides a high link budget, allowing the receiver to receive signal levels below the noise floor. Higher Spreading Factor (SF) values spread the signal over more time, putting more energy and enabling fruitful reception over longer distances. The LoRa Alliance developed LoRaWAN, an open protocol standard built on top of LoRa [106]. A star-of-stars topology is used to implement the LoRaWAN network architecture. The end nodes send the data to the nearby gateways (LoRa packets), and the gateways further send the data to the network server via regular IP connections (IP packets), as shown in Figure 13. Further, the data from the network server are sent to the application server, where the user can access the data. All these three LPWAN technologies are compared considering various key aspects, as shown in Table 10 [13,107,108,109]. The range mentioned in Table 10 is ideal, and in real-time scenarios the range will be affected by several factors.

6. Proposed ISM Architecture Using LoRa Technology

From Section 5.2, among all the discussed LPWAN technologies, LoRa possesses certain unique characteristics for building standalone networks, where an individual can build their network without depending on the third-party service provider. Due to this unique advantage, LoRa finds usage in many present-day advanced communication networks-based applications. With this motivation, the following subsections provide more insights into the usage of LoRa technology with a proposed architecture for ISM development.

6.1. Dissecting LoRa

LoRa technology is invented by Cycleo; Semtech later acquired Cycleo. Now Semtech has the intellectual property rights for LoRa. LoRa is available for two layers, namely the PHY layer (LoRa Radio) and MAC Layer (LoRaWAN). LoRa modulation is a unique spread spectrum technique, which uses wideband linear frequency-modulated pulses whose frequency changes over time. This makes LoRa immune to multipath fading and the Doppler effect. To represent data, LoRa uses up-chirps (increase frequency) and down-chirps (decrease frequency). It follows a packet format that is shown in Figure 14. To ensure security, an “advanced encryption standard” is used. The spreading factor, bandwidth, and coding rate are the key physical layer parameters that influence LoRa’s coverage and power consumption, which are described in the following [110,111].
The number of bits used to represent each symbol is determined by the spreading factor. It is in the range of 7 to 12 depending on the application. According to the regional specifications document (for India), the bandwidth offered is 125 kHz and the data rate is 0.3 to 50 kbps. To achieve different data rates, “adaptive data rates” can be used as per the considered application. The forward error correction helps to recover the data during the interferences. This is achieved by adding the redundant bits. The coding rate is the portion of transmitted bits that carries the actual data. The code rates that are used by LoRa are 4/5, 4/6, 4/7, or 4/8. A greater code rate provides more protection; thereby, recovery becomes easy, but it also increases the Time on Air (ToA). When the transmitter antenna sends a signal, it takes a certain amount of time in air to reach the receiver antenna, which is called ToA and can be understood in Figure 15.
Any MAC layer can be used with the LoRa physical layer; however, LoRaWAN is the currently proposed MAC that uses a star-of-stars topology. It describes how end devices should communicate with the gateway. The gateways are then connected to network and application servers. Communication between the end node and the gateway may not be required at regular intervals in most real-time scenarios, so LoRaWAN considers three different categories of end devices, as shown in Figure 16, namely Class A, Class B, and Class C. The transmission can be started by the end node at any time in Class A devices. It opens two receive slots (Rx1, Rx2) after each transmission slot (Tx). Downlink transmissions can be accepted by Class B devices during scheduled receive slots. In Class C, the receiver slots will always be open, except during the uplink period. Devices will be listening to the gateway all the time [112,113,114]. Some of the latest and key works that are developed using LoRa are mentioned in Table 11.

6.2. Proposed LoRa Based Architecture

To achieve the fruitful establishment of ISMs, an integrated architecture is proposed, as shown in Figure 17. To represent the concept of the proposed ISMs, four microgrids are interconnected with each other using a common electrical bus and communication network (through a gateway). Each building has its own local generation and load. This interconnected operation enables energy sharing among the microgrids. Further, the CMCU captures the energy generation and consumption data of each microgrid based on a predefined time interval and maintains this database for further actions. These actions involve energy management operations to optimally share the energy between the loads of various microgrids, performing various data analytics to study various data quality issues as well as a future estimate for contingency readiness, etc.
From an operation point of view, the entire ISM architecture shown in Figure 17 can be represented as a three-layer structure, as shown in Figure 18. It involves the electrical layer, communication layer, and IT layer.
The typical duties of the electrical layer are: facilitating energy management operations and power quality control. This layer has all the electrical equipment, viz., generating the sources and loads of each microgrid, electrical connectivity among microgrids and utility grid through circuit breakers (CBs). These CBs are operated based on the control commands sent by the CMCU. Further, it has metering devices (smart meters—SMs) to read the generation (PES1…n) and load (PL1…n). All the microgrids are connected to the utility grid at a node called the “point of common coupling (PCC)”.
The typical duties of the communication layer are facilitating continuous data sensing and data transfer from LoRa end nodes (ENs) to CMCU, control signals from CMCU to CBs and PCC, and providing secure transmissions between the electrical layer and IT layer. The ENs are connected to all the SMs (of sources and loads of each microgrid) and CBs. From these end nodes, the collected data will be transferred to the CMCU through the LoRaWAN gateway. Data security algorithms can be implemented to ensure security for the data transmission in both directions.
The IT layer has CMCU and LoRaWAN gateway. The CMCU operations are divided into three subunits, viz., central monitoring unit (CMU), analytics unit (AU), and central control unit (CCU). CMU has to monitor data continuously and provide a human–machine interface to supply user inputs. It also has to provide a database for storing the analysis results in future. AU has to perform all the computations and suggest optimal unit commitment for energy transfer between microgrids. It also has to perform forecasting for future contingency analysis and readiness and fault studies.
Additionally, the AU has to perform various data analytics operations using advanced machine learning algorithms to ensure a better visibility of the captured data, which helps to effectively operate the entire system. CCU has to provide the control signals to operate CBs or PCC for power exchange based on the optimal strategy derived by AU. It also has to provide alerts whenever any emergency or abnormality is detected.
The low-level view of a LoRa-based communication network for the interoperability (interconnection) of various microgrids in a locality is shown in Figure 19. As shown in this figure, each of these buildings has a LoRa end node, which acts as a communication facility module for the corresponding building. As discussed above, the SMs capture the generation and load at the associated microgrid and communicate this information (via their respective LoRa end node) to the CMCU (through LoRa Gateway). According to these captured values, the CMCU computes the requirement of power export or power import for each of these microgrids based on the predefined energy management strategy. Based on these computations, the CMCU operates the corresponding CBs (via their respective LoRa end nodes) that are connected between the microgrids, to enable their interconnectivity. This interconnectivity through CBs facilitates the power import/export between any two microgrids, as dictated by the CMCU through respective control commands.
As shown in Figure 19, the CMCU has to be equipped with a backup computation (or storage) unit along with the master unit. This backup computation unit is a redundant unit, which ensures the protection of data under any failures of the master unit.

7. Summary and Outlook

The increasing importance of utility-grid independent systems in the present-day global energy sector encourages the study of various technologies on which these systems are relying. Keeping this in view, a systemic and technical assessment of various communication technologies that can be used for the development of ISMs is detailed in this paper. This paper started with a review of various state-of-the-art developments, where various worldwide footprints and Indian initiatives are discussed along with the work conducted at the macrogrid and microgrid levels. Then, it progressed to a discussion on various standards and communication technologies that are useful in deploying the ISMs. A discussion on numerous issues and challenges in the implementation of ISMs is provided.
Further, it is expected that this field of research will continue to expand, and with this theme, this paper suggests a number of possible research directions that could serve as a guide for researchers. A new communication strategy is needed to facilitate the transition from traditional centralized systems to decentralized systems. With the goal of improving the performance of communication networks for their use in microgrids, various advanced wireless technologies in LPWANs, such as Sigfox, NB-IoT and LoRaWAN, are detailed. At last, all these technologies are compared with respect to various features, and finally, this paper suggested a LoRa-based architecture for the ISMs with all necessary functionalities to establish effective ISMs.

Limitations

We present here a few challenges that should be taken into consideration while implementing the proposed architecture:
LoRa technology is limited in terms of its data rate. So, it may affect communication during emergencies, where fast data communication is normally desired.
Grid connection and control in the microgrid network need to be developed in a robust manner as they may affect the entire power network.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India, for funding the open access publication fee for this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cabana-Jiménez, K.; Candelo-Becerra, J.E.; Sousa Santos, V. Comprehensive Analysis of Microgrids Configurations and Topologies. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, Y.V.P.; Ravikumar, B. Integrating Renewable Energy Sources to an Urban Building in India: Challenges, Opportunities, and Techno-Economic Feasibility Simulation. Technol. Econ. Smart Grids Sustain. Energy 2016, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kumar, Y.P.; Bhimasingu, R. Electrical Machines Based DC/AC Energy Conversion Schemes for the Improvement of Power Quality and Resiliency in Renewable Energy Microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2017, 90, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Purna, P.K.; Pavan, K.Y.V. Simple and Effective Descriptive Analysis of Missing Data Anomalies in Smart Home Energy Consumption Readings. J. Energy Syst. 2021, 5, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reddy, G.P.; Kumar, Y.V. Retrofitted IoT Based Communication Network with Hot Standby Router Protocol and Advanced Features for Smart Buildings. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2021, 11, 1354–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Karystinos, C.; Vasilakis, A.; Kotsampopoulos, P.; Hatziargyriou, N. Local Energy Exchange Market for Community Off-Grid Microgrids: Case Study Los Molinos Del Rio Aguas. Energies 2022, 15, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suhaimy, N.; Radzi, N.A.M.; Ahmad, W.S.H.M.W.; Azmi, K.H.M.; Hannan, M.A. Current and Future Communication Solutions for Smart Grids: A Review. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 43639–43668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abrahamsen, F.E.; Ai, Y.; Cheffena, M. Communication Technologies for Smart Grid: A Comprehensive Survey. Sensors 2021, 21, 8087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghorbanian, M.; Dolatabadi, S.H.; Masjedi, M.; Siano, P. Communication in Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Review on the Existing and Future Communication and Information Infrastructures. IEEE Syst. J. 2019, 13, 4001–4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rehmani, M.H.; Reisslein, M.; Rachedi, A.; Erol-Kantarci, M.; Radenkovic, M. Integrating Renewable Energy Resources into the Smart Grid: Recent Developments in Information and Communication Technologies. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2018, 14, 2814–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marzal, S.; Salas, R.; González-Medina, R.; Garcerá, G.; Figueres, E. Current Challenges and Future Trends in the Field of Communication Architectures for Microgrids. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 3610–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Li, Z.; Shahidehpour, M.; Aminifar, F.; Alabdulwahab, A.; Al-Turki, Y. Networked Microgrids for Enhancing the Power System Resilience. Proc. IEEE 2017, 105, 1289–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Raza, U.; Kulkarni, P.; Sooriyabandara, M. Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 19, 855–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Andreadou, N.; Guardiola, M.; Fulli, G. Telecommunication Technologies for Smart Grid Projects with Focus on Smart Metering Applications. Energies 2016, 9, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parhizi, S.; Lotfi, H.; Khodaei, A.; Bahramirad, S. State of the Art in Research on Microgrids: A Review. IEEE Access 2015, 3, 890–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pavan Kumar, Y.V.; Bhimasingu, R. Review and Retrofitted Architectures to Form Reliable Smart Microgrid Networks for Urban Buildings. IET Netw. 2015, 4, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, Y.V.P.; Ravikumar, B. Review and Refined Architectures for Monitoring, Information Exchange, and Control of Interconnected Distributed Resources. In Progress in Systems Engineering; Selvaraj, H., Zydek, D., Chmaj, G., Eds.; Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 366, pp. 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ustun, T.S.; Ozansoy, C.; Zayegh, A. Recent Developments in Microgrids and Example Cases around the World—A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 4030–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carpathian Modernized Energy Network. Available online: https://delgaz.ro/smart-grid/informatii-generale/en (accessed on 14 July 2022).
  20. Gabreta Smart Grids. Available online: https://www.gabreta-smartgrids.eu/ (accessed on 14 July 2022).
  21. Accelerating Renewable Connections. Available online: https://smarter.energynetworks.org/projects/spt2004/ (accessed on 14 July 2022).
  22. ATENEA Microgrid. Available online: https://ses.jrc.ec.europa.eu/atenea-microgrid (accessed on 14 July 2022).
  23. Yu, F.; Zhang, P.; Xiao, W.; Choudhury, P. Communication Systems for Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Resources. IEEE Netw. 2011, 25, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Stanciulescu, G.; Farhangi, H.; Palizban, A.; Stanchev, N. Communication Technologies for BCIT Smart Microgrid. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, 16–20 January 2012; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Foster, R.; Woods, T.; Hoffbeck, I. Bamiyan 1 MWp Solar Mini-Grid (Afghanistan). In Proceedings of the ISES Solar World Congress 2015, Daegu, Korea, 8–12 November 2015; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hydropowered Mini-Grids in NEPAL, United States Agency for International Development. Available online: https://www.usaid.gov/energy/mini-grids/case-studies/nepal-hydropower (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  27. Hydropower in Tanzania’s Rural Highlands, United States Agency for International Development. Available online: https://www.usaid.gov/energy/mini-grids/case-studies/tanzania-hydropower (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  28. Providing Power to an off-Grid Community in Kigbe, Nigeria. Available online: https://solar.schneider-electric.com/providing-power-to-an-off-grid-community-in-kigbe-nigeria/ (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  29. Environmentohio: Microgrids Energy Storage, Toward 100% Clean, Renewable Energy on Campus. Available online: https://environmentohio.org/sites/environment/files/resources/Campus%20Microgrids%20-%20Environment%20America%20-%20October%202017.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  30. ARC Power Rwanda, Renewable Energy Performance Platform. Available online: http://repp.energy/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ARC-Power.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  31. Buffalo Energy Ltd., Renewable Energy Performance Platform. Available online: http://repp.energy/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Buffalo-Corporate.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  32. POWERGEN AND CBEA, Renewable Energy Performance Platform. Available online: http://repp.energy/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Powergen-and-CBEA.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  33. Alternative Energy Development Board. Available online: http://www.aedb.org/ae-technologies/solar-power/solar-current-status (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  34. Yokohama—Smart City Project. Available online: http://commoning.city/project/yokohama-smart-city-project/ (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  35. Island Mini-Grids in West Bengal. Available online: https://www.usaid.gov/energy/mini-grids/case-studies/india-island-minigrids/ (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  36. Biomass Gasification in India. Available online: https://www.usaid.gov/energy/mini-grids/case-studies/india-biomass (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  37. Baikampady Mangalore Microgrid. Available online: http://microgridprojects.com/microgrid/baikampady-mangalore-microgrid/ (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  38. Kalkeri Sangeet Vidyalaya dc Microgrid. Available online: http://microgridprojects.com/microgrid/kalkeri-sangeet-vidyalaya-dc-microgrid/ (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  39. Darewadi Solar Microgrid. Available online: https://gramoorja.in/wp-content/uploads/Darewadi.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  40. Bhamane. Hybrid Microgrid (Solar + Micro-Hydro). Available online: https://gramoorja.in/wp-content/uploads/Bhamane.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  41. PM Modi Yojana, Karnataka Surya Raitha Scheme. Available online: https://pmmodiyojana.in/karnataka-surya-raitha-scheme/ (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  42. Chang, K.-H.; Mason, B. The IEEE 802.15.4g Standard for Smart Metering Utility Networks. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Tainan, Taiwan, 5–8 November 2012; pp. 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, R.; Chen, H.-H.; Huang, Y.-R.; Meng, W. Smart Grid Communication: Its Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2013, 4, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhu, J. Communication Network for Smart Grid Interoperability. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), Chengdu, China, 6–7 June 2015; pp. 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cao, Y.; Jiang, T.; He, M.; Zhang, J. Device-to-Device Communications for Energy Management: A Smart Grid Case. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2016, 34, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, Y.; Cheng, C.; Gu, T.; Jiang, T.; Li, X. A Lightweight Authenticated Communication Scheme for Smart Grid. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 836–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bilgin, B.E.; Baktir, S.; Gungor, V.C. Collecting Smart Meter Data via Public Transportation Buses. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2016, 10, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. You, M.; Liu, Q.; Sun, H. New Communication Strategy for Spectrum Sharing Enabled Smart Grid Cyber-Physical System. IET Cyber-Phys. Syst. Theory Appl. 2017, 2, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wibisono, G.; Permata, S.G.; Awaludin, A.; Suhasfan, P. Development of Advanced Metering Infrastructure Based on LoRa WAN in PLN Bali toward Bali Eco Smart Grid. In Proceedings of the 2017 Saudi Arabia Smart Grid (SASG), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 12–14 December 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Song, E.Y.; FitzPatrick, G.J.; Lee, K.B. Smart Sensors and Standard-Based Interoperability in Smart Grids. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 7723–7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.; Cheng, X.; Cao, Y.; Wang, D.; Yang, L. Smart Choice for the Smart Grid: Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT). IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hwang, L.-C.; Chen, C.-S.; Ku, T.-T.; Shyu, W.-C. A Bridge between the Smart Grid and the Internet of Things: Theoretical and Practical Roles of LoRa. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 113, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, B.; Lu, R.; Xiao, G.; Bao, H.; Ghorbani, A.A. Towards Insider Threats Detection in Smart Grid Communication Systems. IET Commun. 2019, 13, 1728–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Issa, G.F.; Shubita, A.F.; Arqoub, M.A.; Banna, A.A. Local Area Grid: Power Distribution and Sharing within Neighboring Households. In Proceedings of the 2013 1st International Conference Exhibition on the Applications of Information Technology to Renewable Energy Processes and Systems, Amman, Jordan, 29–31 May 2013; pp. 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bani-Ahmed, A.; Weber, L.; Nasiri, A.; Hosseini, H. Microgrid Communications: State of the Art and Future Trends. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), Milwaukee, WI, USA, 19–22 October 2014; pp. 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Giraldo, J.; Mojica-Nava, E.; Quijano, N. Synchronization of Isolated Microgrids with a Communication Infrastructure Using Energy Storage Systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 63, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lai, J.; Zhou, H.; Hu, W.; Lu, X.; Zhong, L. Synchronization of Hybrid Microgrids with Communication Latency. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 2015, e586260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Setiawan, M.A.; Shahnia, F.; Rajakaruna, S.; Ghosh, A. ZigBee-Based Communication System for Data Transfer Within Future Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2015, 6, 2343–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kounev, V.; Tipper, D.; Yavuz, A.A.; Grainger, B.M.; Reed, G.F. A Secure Communication Architecture for Distributed Microgrid Control. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2015, 6, 2484–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumar, Y.V.P.; Bhimasingu, R. Key Aspects of Smart Grid Design for Distribution System Automation: Architecture and Responsibilities. Procedia Technol. 2015, 21, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kim, J.; Byun, J.; Jeong, D.; Choi, M.; Kang, B.; Park, S. An IoT-Based Home Energy Management System over Dynamic Home Area Networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015, 11, 828023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moghimi, M.; Bennett, C.; Leskarac, D.; Stegen, S.; Lu, J. Communication Architecture and Data Acquisition for Experimental MicroGrid Installations. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 15–18 November 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. AlSkaif, T.; Zapata, M.G.; Bellalta, B.; Nilsson, A. A Distributed Power Sharing Framework among Households in Microgrids: A Repeated Game Approach. Computing 2017, 99, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Patrao, I.; González-Medina, R.; Marzal, S.; Garcerá, G.; Figueres, E. Synchronization of Power Inverters in Islanded Microgrids Using an FM-Modulated Signal. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2017, 8, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Wu, L.; Li, J.; Erol-Kantarci, M.; Kantarci, B. An Integrated Reconfigurable Control and Self-Organizing Communication Framework for Community Resilience Microgrids. Electr. J. 2017, 30, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Singh, A.; Strating, A.T.; Romero Herrera, N.A.; van Dijk, H.W.; Keyson, D.V. Towards an Ethnography of Electrification in Rural India: Social Relations and Values in Household Energy Exchanges. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2017, 30, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Harmon, E.; Ozgur, U.; Cintuglu, M.H.; de Azevedo, R.; Akkaya, K.; Mohammed, O.A. The Internet of Microgrids: A Cloud-Based Framework for Wide Area Networked Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 1262–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ali, I.; Suhail Hussain, S.M. Communication Design for Energy Management Automation in Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 9, 2055–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hussain, S.M.S.; Tak, A.; Ustun, T.S.; Ali, I. Communication Modeling of Solar Home System and Smart Meter in Smart Grids. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 16985–16996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Long, C.; Wu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Jenkins, N. Peer-to-Peer Energy Sharing through a Two-Stage Aggregated Battery Control in a Community Microgrid. Appl. Energy 2018, 226, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Saleh, M.; Esa, Y.; Hariri, M.E.; Mohamed, A. Impact of Information and Communication Technology Limitations on Microgrid Operation. Energies 2019, 12, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Yang, H.; Li, Q.; Chen, W. 9—Microgrid Communication System and Its Application in Hierarchical Control. In Smart Power Distribution Systems; Yang, Q., Yang, T., Li, W., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 179–204. ISBN 978-0-12-812154-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xu, W.; Kim, J.Y.; Huang, W.; Kanhere, S.S.; Jha, S.K.; Hu, W. Measurement, Characterization, and Modeling of LoRa Technology in Multifloor Buildings. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Du, Y.; Li, F. Intelligent Multi-Microgrid Energy Management Based on Deep Neural Network and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 1066–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Reddy, G.P.; Pavan Kumar, Y.V. Smart Grid Communication and Networking: Review of Standards. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Electricity (ICATE), Craiova, Romania, 27–29 May 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. IEC Webstore. Available online: https://webstore.iec.ch/home (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  77. IEEE Standards Association. Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  78. ISO Standards. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standards.html (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  79. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available online: https://www.nist.gov/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  80. Telecommunications Industry Association. Available online: https://tiaonline.org/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  81. ANSI Webstore. Available online: https://webstore.ansi.org/industry/smartgrid (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  82. MultiSpeak. Available online: https://www.multispeak.org/ (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  83. Sofana Reka, S.; Dragičević, T.; Siano, P.; Prabaharan, S.R.S. Future Generation 5G Wireless Networks for Smart Grid: A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2019, 12, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ansari, J.; Andersson, C.; de Bruin, P.; Farkas, J.; Grosjean, L.; Sachs, J.; Torsner, J.; Varga, B.; Harutyunyan, D.; König, N.; et al. Performance of 5G Trials for Industrial Automation. Electronics 2022, 11, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chen, M.; Liu, W.; Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Liu, A. A Game-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Energy-Efficient Computation in MEC Systems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2022, 235, 107660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, M.; Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Liu, A. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Computation Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing Environment. Comput. Commun. 2021, 175, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ghosal, A.; Conti, M. Key Management Systems for Smart Grid Advanced Metering Infrastructure: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2019, 21, 2831–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Alavikia, Z.; Shabro, M. A Comprehensive Layered Approach for Implementing Internet of Things-Enabled Smart Grid: A Survey. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2022, 8, 388–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Saleem, Y.; Crespi, N.; Rehmani, M.H.; Copeland, R. Internet of Things-Aided Smart Grid: Technologies, Architectures, Applications, Prototypes, and Future Research Directions. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 62962–63003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xu, Z.; Luo, J.; Yin, Z.; He, T.; Dong, F. S-MAC: Achieving High Scalability via Adaptive Scheduling in LPWAN. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2020—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6–9 July 2020; IEEE: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2020; pp. 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pisica, I.; Eremia, M. Making Smart Grids Smarter by Using Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2011 46th International Universities’ Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), Soest, Germany, 5–8 September 2011; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ferreira, A.; Leitão, P.; Vrba, P. Challenges of ICT and Artificial Intelligence in Smart Grids. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Energy Systems (IWIES), San Diego, CA, USA, 8 October 2014; pp. 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tsai, J.C.; Yen, N.Y.; Hayashi, T. Social Network Based Smart Grids Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Independent Computing (ISIC), Orlando, FL, USA, 9–12 December 2014; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Berlink, H.; Costa, A.H.R. Batch Reinforcement Learning for Smart Home Energy Management. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 July 2015; pp. 2561–2567. [Google Scholar]
  95. Li, W.; Logenthiran, T.; Phan, V.-T.; Woo, W.L. Intelligent Multi-Agent System for Power Grid Communication. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Singapore, 22–25 November 2016; pp. 3386–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Samek, W.; Stanczak, S.; Wiegand, T. The Convergence of Machine Learning and Communications. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1708.08299. [Google Scholar]
  97. Ahmed, S.; Lee, Y.; Hyun, S.-H.; Koo, I. Feature Selection–Based Detection of Covert Cyber Deception Assaults in Smart Grid Communications Networks Using Machine Learning. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 27518–27529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sanchez-Huertas, W.; Gómez, V.; Hernández, C. Machine Learning Techniques and Smart Grid Applications: A Review. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2018, 13, 10. [Google Scholar]
  99. Hossain, E.; Khan, I.; Un-Noor, F.; Sikander, S.S.; Sunny, M.S.H. Application of Big Data and Machine Learning in Smart Grid, and Associated Security Concerns: A Review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 13960–13988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nayak, D.R.K.; Prakash, D.K.B.; Tripathy, D.R. An Overview of Deep Learning in Smart Grids. IEEE India Info. 2019, 14, 4. [Google Scholar]
  101. Chen, M.; Liu, A.; Liu, W.; Ota, K.; Dong, M.; Xiong, N.N. RDRL: A Recurrent Deep Reinforcement Learning Scheme for Dynamic Spectrum Access in Reconfigurable Wireless Networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2022, 9, 364–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chen, M.; Wang, T.; Ota, K.; Dong, M.; Zhao, M.; Liu, A. Intelligent Resource Allocation Management for Vehicles Network: An A3C Learning Approach. Comput. Commun. 2020, 151, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sigfox. Available online: https://www.sigfox.com/en (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  104. Mwakwata, C.B.; Malik, H.; Mahtab Alam, M.; Le Moullec, Y.; Parand, S.; Mumtaz, S. Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT): From Physical (PHY) and Media Access Control (MAC) Layers Perspectives. Sensors 2019, 19, 2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Semtech LoRa. Available online: https://www.semtech.com/lora (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  106. LoRa Alliance. Available online: https://lora-alliance.org/ (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  107. Mekki, K.; Bajic, E.; Chaxel, F.; Meyer, F. Overview of Cellular LPWAN Technologies for IoT Deployment: Sigfox, LoRaWAN, and NB-IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), Athens, Greece, 19–23 March 2018; IEEE: Athens, Greece, 2018; pp. 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mekki, K.; Bajic, E.; Chaxel, F.; Meyer, F. A Comparative Study of LPWAN Technologies for Large-Scale IoT Deployment. ICT Express 2019, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Reddy, G.P.; Kumar, Y.P. Future Wireless Communication Technologies for Smart Grids: A LPWAN Prospective. Future 2020, 5, 4. Available online: https://smartgrid.ieee.org/bulletins/august-2020/future-wireless-communication-technologies-for-smart-grids-a-lpwan-prospective (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  110. Jadhav, A.R.; Rajalakshmi, P. A Novel PHY Layer Approach for Enhanced Data Rate in LoRa Using Adaptive Symbol Periods. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS), Goa, India, 16–19 December 2019; IEEE: Goa, India, 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yazdani, N.; Kouvelas, N.; Prasad, R.V.; Lucani, D.E. Energy Efficient Data Recovery from Corrupted LoRa Frames. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Madrid, Spain, 7–11 December 2021; IEEE: Madrid, Spain, 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Almuhaya, M.A.M.; Jabbar, W.A.; Sulaiman, N.; Abdulmalek, S. A Survey on LoRaWAN Technology: Recent Trends, Opportunities, Simulation Tools and Future Directions. Electronics 2022, 11, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Reddy, G.P.; Pavan Kumar, Y.V. Demystifying LoRa Wireless Technology for IoT Applications: Concept to Experiment. In Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT), Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia, 6–8 December 2021; IEEE: Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia, 6 December 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Turčinović, F.; Šišul, G.; Bosiljevac, M. LoRaWAN Base Station Improvement for Better Coverage and Capacity. J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 2022, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Branch, P.; Cricenti, T. A LoRa Based Wireless Relay Network for Actuator Data. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Barcelona, Spain, 7–10 January 2020; IEEE: Barcelona, Spain, 2020; pp. 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Choi, R.; Lee, S.; Lee, S. Reliability Improvement of LoRa with ARQ and Relay Node. Symmetry 2020, 12, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Petajajarvi, J.; Mikhaylov, K.; Roivainen, A.; Hanninen, T.; Pettissalo, M. On the Coverage of LPWANs: Range Evaluation and Channel Attenuation Model for LoRa Technology. In Proceedings of the 2015 14th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST), Copenhagen, Denmark, 2–4 December 2015; pp. 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bor, M.C.; Roedig, U.; Voigt, T.; Alonso, J.M. Do LoRa Low-Power Wide-Area Networks Scale? In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, Malta, Malta, 13 November 2016; pp. 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Reynders, B.; Pollin, S. Chirp Spread Spectrum as a Modulation Technique for Long Range Communication. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technologies (SCVT), Mons, Belgium, 22 November 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Pop, A.-I.; Raza, U.; Kulkarni, P.; Sooriyabandara, M. Does Bidirectional Traffic Do More Harm Than Good in LoRaWAN Based LPWA Networks? In Proceedings of the GLOBECOM 2017—2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Singapore, 4–8 December 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Haxhibeqiri, J.; Van den Abeele, F.; Moerman, I.; Hoebeke, J. LoRa Scalability: A Simulation Model Based on Interference Measurements. Sensors 2017, 17, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Bankov, D.; Khorov, E.; Lyakhov, A. Mathematical Model of LoRaWAN Channel Access. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Macau, China, 12–15 June 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Herrera-Tapia, J.; Hernández-Orallo, E.; Tomás, A.; Calafate, C.T.; Cano, J.-C.; Zennaro, M.; Manzoni, P. Evaluating the Use of Sub-Gigahertz Wireless Technologies to Improve Message Delivery in Opportunistic Networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Calabria, Italy, 16–18 May 2017; pp. 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bankov, D.; Khorov, E.; Lyakhov, A. Mathematical Model of LoRaWAN Channel Access with Capture Effect. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 8–13 October 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. To, T.-H.; Duda, A. Simulation of LoRa in NS-3: Improving LoRa Performance with CSMA. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kansas City, MO, USA, 20–24 May 2018; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Reynders, B.; Wang, Q.; Pollin, S. A LoRaWAN Module for Ns-3: Implementation and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on ns-3, New York, NY, USA, 13 June 2018; pp. 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Masadan, N.A.B.; Habaebi, M.H.; Yusoff, S.H. LoRa LPWAN Propagation Channel Modelling in IIUM Campus. In Proceedings of the 2018 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 19–20 September 2018; pp. 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sanchez-Iborra, R.; Sanchez-Gomez, J.; Ballesta-Viñas, J.; Cano, M.-D.; Skarmeta, A.F. Performance Evaluation of LoRa Considering Scenario Conditions. Sensors 2018, 18, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Thomas, A.; Eldhose, N.V. Scalability Concerns of Chirp Spread Spectrum for LPWAN Applications. IJASUC 2019, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Karthik, M.; Gunapriya, B.; Vivek, P.N.; Vishalakshi, A.; Gayathiri, M. E-Metering and Fault Detection in Smart Water Distribution Systems Using Wireless Network. IJITEE 2019, 8, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. El Chall, R.; Lahoud, S.; El Helou, M. LoRaWAN Network: Radio Propagation Models and Performance Evaluation in Various Environments in Lebanon. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 6, 2366–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Polonelli, T.; Brunelli, D.; Marzocchi, A.; Benini, L. Slotted ALOHA on LoRaWAN-Design, Analysis, and Deployment. Sensors 2019, 19, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Renewable energy integration in the present power system scenario.
Figure 1. Renewable energy integration in the present power system scenario.
Sensors 22 05881 g001
Figure 2. Constituents of a smart microgrid associated with a building.
Figure 2. Constituents of a smart microgrid associated with a building.
Sensors 22 05881 g002
Figure 3. Organization of the paper.
Figure 3. Organization of the paper.
Sensors 22 05881 g003
Figure 4. Key standards and technologies for smart microgrid communication.
Figure 4. Key standards and technologies for smart microgrid communication.
Sensors 22 05881 g004
Figure 5. Detailed list of standards and guidelines for smart microgrid communication.
Figure 5. Detailed list of standards and guidelines for smart microgrid communication.
Sensors 22 05881 g005
Figure 6. Typical connectivity scenario in the smart grid network.
Figure 6. Typical connectivity scenario in the smart grid network.
Sensors 22 05881 g006
Figure 7. Elucidation of PAN, LAN, MAN, and WAN.
Figure 7. Elucidation of PAN, LAN, MAN, and WAN.
Sensors 22 05881 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of various wireless communication technologies.
Figure 8. Comparison of various wireless communication technologies.
Sensors 22 05881 g008
Figure 9. Key issues and challenges in ISM deployment.
Figure 9. Key issues and challenges in ISM deployment.
Sensors 22 05881 g009
Figure 10. Future research directions for ISMs.
Figure 10. Future research directions for ISMs.
Sensors 22 05881 g010
Figure 11. Sigfox network architecture.
Figure 11. Sigfox network architecture.
Sensors 22 05881 g011
Figure 12. NB-IoT network architecture.
Figure 12. NB-IoT network architecture.
Sensors 22 05881 g012
Figure 13. LoRa network architecture.
Figure 13. LoRa network architecture.
Sensors 22 05881 g013
Figure 14. LoRa packet format.
Figure 14. LoRa packet format.
Sensors 22 05881 g014
Figure 15. ToA representation in a transmitter–receiver communication system.
Figure 15. ToA representation in a transmitter–receiver communication system.
Sensors 22 05881 g015
Figure 16. Tx/Rx windows for Class A, Class B, and Class C devices.
Figure 16. Tx/Rx windows for Class A, Class B, and Class C devices.
Sensors 22 05881 g016
Figure 17. High-level view of ISM architecture.
Figure 17. High-level view of ISM architecture.
Sensors 22 05881 g017
Figure 18. Three-layer representation of ISM architecture.
Figure 18. Three-layer representation of ISM architecture.
Sensors 22 05881 g018
Figure 19. Low-level view of LoRa-based communication network for ISMs.
Figure 19. Low-level view of LoRa-based communication network for ISMs.
Sensors 22 05881 g019
Table 1. Summary of review works presented in the literature.
Table 1. Summary of review works presented in the literature.
ReferenceDiscussed TopicsGrid LevelYear
[7]Current and Future Communication Solutions for Smart Grids.Macrogrid2022
[8]Communication Technologies for Smart Grid.Macrogrid2021
[9]Technical features of communication technologies, various standards and applications.Macrogrid2019
[10]Latest advances in communication and information technologies.Macrogrid2018
[11]Communication architectures challenges and future trends.Microgrid2018
[12]Various elements of power system resilience.Microgrid2017
[13]Various technologies and standards in the LPWAN (Low Power Wide Area Network).Macrogrid2017
[14]Telecommunication technologies (wired and wireless).Macrogrid2016
[15]Electrical layer and communication layers of microgrid.Microgrid2015
[16]IEEE-1547, ISA-95, NIST, and IEC-61850.Microgrid2015
[17]IEEE 1547.3.Macrogrid2015
[18]Power systems, power electronics fields for microgrids, and potential avenues for further research.Microgrid2011
Table 2. Summary of worldwide initiatives.
Table 2. Summary of worldwide initiatives.
S. NoName/TitleCountryDescriptionCharacteristicsPayment Policy/
Funding
Ref.
1Carpathian Modernized Energy Network (CARMEN)Hungary and RomaniaDigitalization of the system with the deployment of communication and IT facilities Infrastructure of 40 HV/MV modern transformer stations in 6 counties in the north-east region of Romania, in addition to a few more updatesProject promoters are the DELGAZ GRID, Romanian DSO, with support of the Romanian TSO and others[19]
2Gabreta SGCzech Republic and GermanyThis project introduces cross-border interconnections with the goal of the modernization and digitalization of energy infrastructureConstruction of Medium-Voltage (MV) and Low-Voltage (LV) lines with smart elementsGerman DSO Bayernwerk Netz GmbH (BAG) and the Czech DSO EG.D (EGD)[20]
3Accelerating Renewable Connections (ARC)United KingdomConnecting several renewable energy sources quickly to the distribution networkSmart network management; integration of large-scale renewables Scottish Power Energy Networks[21]
4ATENEA MicrogridSpainFacilitating the integration of renewable sources at the distribution levelThe energy management software CeMOS® is established to control and operate the entire systemCENE-National Renewable Energy Centre[22]
5BMW (Bear Mountain Wind) farmCanada34 ENERCON wind turbine generators were used102 MW capacityOwned by Bear Mountain Wind LP[23]
6BCIT (British Columbia Institute of Technology)CanadaSolar and wind turbines were used8KW of electricityICE (Innovative Clean Energy) NSERC CRD Grant[24]
7Afghanistan’s Bamiyan Renewable Energy Program (BREP)AfghanistanPV is used1 MW capacityPre-paid pay-as-you-go model[25]
8Hydro powered minigridsNepal2000 hydro-powered minigrids were installed with the help of AEPC (Alternative Energy Promotion Center)30 MW capacityTariffs are not uniform[26]
9Hydro powered electrification ProjectTanzaniaThis project supported more than 2200 rural customers with a total of 21.5 GWh of AC power4 MW capacityDifferent tariffs available (lifeline, wholesale)[27]
10Rural electrification in Kigbe, NigeriaNigeriaSchneider Electric and Havenhill Synergy collaborated to build a minigridA local (onsite) minigrid was establishedFund from the United States African Development Foundation and Power Africa Initiative[28]
11Las Positas collegeUSAThis community college is located in Livermore, California55% of the campus energy requirement is managed by the solar arraysUSD 15 million funds supported by California Energy Commission[29]
12ARC power minigridsRwandaThe 1st phase of an ambitious scheme to erect a large set of minigrids in Rwanda PV (first phase: 0.12 MW; whole project: 3.5 MW)Energy from minigrids is being offered on pre-pay, pay-as-you-go basis to off-grid communities[30]
13Buffalo Energy Ltd.ZambiaBuffalo Energy Ltd. was established in 2016 to develop small-scale projects to provide renewable, low-cost power.Solar PV, biomass, wind
Estimate of capacity: 30 MW
REPP funding support[31]
14POWERGEN AND CBEATanzaniaAs the operator, PowerGen will be incentivized to ensure the efficient operation of the sites.PV installed capacity: 1.2 MWPay-As-You-Go basis[32]
15AEDBPakistanHydro, solar, and wind power are used22 solar PV power projects with a cumulative capacity of nearly 890.80 MWGovernment of Pakistan[33]
16Yokohama Smart City Project (YSCP)JapanSolar, wind, and hydro power and biomass are usedA goal was set on 20% energy reduction by 4000 homesThe consortium of seven Japanese companies[34]
Table 3. Summary of Indian initiatives.
Table 3. Summary of Indian initiatives.
S. NoName/TitleDescriptionCharacteristicsPayment Policy/FundingRef.
1Island minigrids in West Bengal23 minigrids were developed by WBREDA (West Bengal Renewable Energy Development Agency)Primarily solar photovoltaic is used along with other renewable technologies. Additionally, the range is between 25 kWp and 100 kWpFlat fee for a fixed amount of power[35]
2Biomass gasification minigrid (primarily in Bihar)Decentralized Energy Systems of India (DESI) installs biomass gasification minigrid systemsCapacity varies from 30 kW to 150 kWPayment policy depends on the type of customer: commercial customers or residential customers[36]
3Baikampady mangalore microgrid (SELCO) in Karnataka)75 houses were provided with power1.2 kV PV panels are usedCharged based on the type of household[37]
4Kalkeri Sangeet VidyalayaThis is a residential music school. Grant was awarded to the school14 kW PV is used to manage the needsThe system was paid for in advance with a percentage paid on commissioning of the system[38]
5Darewadi solar microgrid, Pune districtDarewadi grid is maintained by the village committeeA solar capacity of 9.36 kW is availablePayments depending on electric usage[39]
6Bhamane hybrid (solar+ micro-hydro) microgridBhamane is located in Uttar Karnataka DistrictSolar capacity—3 kW;
hydro capacity—5 kW
Monthly payments depending on electric usage[40]
7Surya raitha schemeBESCOM (Government of Karnataka) has taken up a pilot projectThe pilot is taken up in Kanakapura Taluk for energizing 310 IP setsTariff is decided by KERC (Karnataka Electricity Regulation Commission)[41]
Table 4. State-of-the-art literature works on macrogrids.
Table 4. State-of-the-art literature works on macrogrids.
S. NoObjectives/TechnologyMerits/Methods/MetricsYearRef.
1IEEE 802.14.4g, IEEE 802.14.4eMR-FSK, MR-OFDM, and MR-OQPSK; Header IE and Payload IE2012[42]
2Smart grid communicationChallenges such as ensuring standard interoperability, unlicensed radio spectra, and cybersecurity are discussed.2013[43]
3InteroperabilitySteps: (1) IT layer; (2) electrical layer; (3) communications.2015[44]
4D2D communicationInformation loss rate and peak bandwidth are used as metrics. The rules were made around relay nodes and base stations in methodology execution.2016[45]
5Secured communicationA lightweight authenticated communication scheme is proposed.2016[46]
6TelecommunicationsWired and wireless technologies are discussed.2016[14]
7Smart meter data collectionVANET is used to collect data from wireless automatic meter reading.2016[47]
8Spectrum sharingPriority-based communication strategy is proposed.2017[48]
9AMI for PLN BaliLoRaWAN is proposed to collect data from meters.2017[49]
10Smart sensors for smart gridsPhasor measurement unit-based smart sensors is developed. However, high-accuracy timing and time synchronization are constraints.2017[50]
11Smart choice for smart gridsNB-IoT is discussed. However, its real-time deployment will be costly.2018[51]
12LoRa communicationDistance, obstacles, and noise are used as metrics for this study.2019[52]
13Insider threats detectionNovel hybrid insider threats model is proposed.2019[53]
14Future communication and information infrastructuresVarious standards and applications were discussed.2019[9]
Table 5. State-of-the-art literature works conducted on the microgrid.
Table 5. State-of-the-art literature works conducted on the microgrid.
S. NoObjective(s)Merits/Methods/MetricsYearRef.
1Case studies in various countriesPower systems and power electronics fields of microgrids are discussed.2011[18]
2Energy sharing between neighboring householdsA local grid with a single power generation source is discussed. Communication between the households is given importance.2013[54]
3State of the art in microgrid communicationInternet Protocol suite, DNP3, Modbus, and IEC 61850 are discussed.2014[55]
4Frequency synchronization of several isolated microgridsLTI system approach with consensus algorithm is used.2014[56]
5Synchronization in microgrids with communication latencyDistributed secondary control algorithm is used.2015[57]
6Zigbee for microgridsCommunication delay is taken as a metric.2015[58]
7Security schemeControl loop delay is the metric used for co-simulation.2015[59]
8State of the art in microgridsThe electrical layer and communication layer are reviewed.2015[15]
9Review on IEEE-1547, ISA-95, NISA, IEC-61850Suggestions were given mostly for IEEE-1547 and IEC-61850 architectures. It requires two copies of diagnostic packets.2015[16]
10Distribution system automationTechnologies and levels of automation are discussed.2015[60]
11Home Energy Management System (HEMS)IoT-based HEMS with a PV system is proposed. A nomadic agent is used to achieve DHANs.2015[61]
12Communication and data acquisitionSunnyBoy Webbox, RedLion data logger, power meters, etc., are used.2015[62]
13Various views of distributed resource system architecturesThe architectural view, requirements view, conceptual view, concurrency view, and network view are discussed.2015[17]
14Distributed power-sharingGame theory approach is used.2017[63]
15Synchronization of power invertersFM signal is used as a synchronization signal.2017[64]
16Reconfigurable control and self-organizing communicationUnique operational characteristics of CRMs are discussed.2017[65]
17Networked microgridsVarious elements of power system resilience are discussed.2017[12]
18Ethnography of electrificationMutual energy exchanges are discussed.2017[66]
19Internet of microgridsInterconnection within microgrid and between microgrids is discussed.2018[67]
20Energy management automationSizing and structuring of communication messages for energy management automation are discussed.2018[68]
21Communication architectures for microgridsIt focuses on centralized (SCADA), decentralized (MAS), and distributed dynamic (P2P-Overlays) structures.2018[11]
22SHS and smart meters for the smart grid are discussedPacket loss of different messages, ETE delay, etc., are discussed.2018[69]
23P2P energy sharingSelf-consumption, self-sufficiency, and energy cost are considered as the assessment metrics.2018[70]
24Impact of ICT degradationLatency for different wireless technologies was discussed.2019[71]
25Microgrid communication systemVarious technologies, categories, and metrics are discussed.2019[72]
26LoRa technology in multi-floor buildingsK-factor for the Rician model is used for the analysis.2020[73]
27Intelligent multi-micro-grid energy managementDNN and a Monte Carlo method are used.2020[74]
Table 6. Various standards and their scope for smart microgrid communication.
Table 6. Various standards and their scope for smart microgrid communication.
Standard NumberDescriptionDetailsYear
IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission)
IEC 61850-7-2:2010+AMD1Communication networks and systems for the power utility automation—Part 7-2: Basic information and communication structure—Abstract communication service interface (ACSI)(i) Interface for specifying communications between client and remote server
(ii) Event distribution between the application of a single device and the application of several remote devices
2020
IEC 61850-7-1:2011+AMD1Communication networks and systems for power utility automation—Part 7-1: Basic communication structure–Principles and modelsThe goal of this standard is to help people understand the basic modelling concepts and methods for: (i) information models which are substation-specific; (ii) device functions for power utility automation; and (iii) communication systems to achieve interoperability2020
IEC 61850-8-2Communication networks and systems for power utility automation—Part 8-2: Specific communication service mapping (SCSM)—Mapping to extensible messaging presence protocol (XMPP)The important aspects in mapping are:
(i) End-to-end security,
(ii) describing the XML payloads, and
(iii) describing the features of XMPP
2018
IEC 62325-503Framework for energy market communications—Part 503: Market data exchange guidelines for the IEC 62325-351 profileAdvanced message queuing protocol (AMQP) is adopted2018
IEC 62056-4-7Electricity metering data exchange—The DLMS/COSEM suite—Part 4-7: DLMS/COSEM transport layer for IP networksConnectionless and connection-oriented transport layers are discussed2015
IEC TR 62357-200Power systems management and associated information exchange—Part 200: Guidelines for migration from Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) to Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)This standard addresses the issues concerned to migration from IPv4 to IPv62015
IEC 60870-6-503Telecontrol equipment and systems—Part 6-503: Telecontrol protocols compatible with ISO standards and ITU-T recommendations-TASE.2 Services and protocolExchange of real-time data, control operations, scheduling and accounting information, remote program control, and event notification were mentioned2014
IEC 61851-24Electric vehicle conductive charging system-Part 24: Digital communication between a d.c. EV charging station and an electric vehicle for control of d.c. chargingDiscusses the digital communication part between the EV charging station and electrical vehicle2014
IEC TR 61850-90-1Communication networks and systems for power utility automation—Part 90-1: Use of IEC 61850 for the communication between substationsThe key points discussed are (i) communication requirements, (ii) services and architecture, (iii) interoperable prerequisites, and (iv) enhancements to SCL (substation configuration description language)2010
IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)
IEEE 1815IEEE Standard for electric power systems communications-distributed network protocol (DNP3)This standard uses distributed network protocol (DNP3) which specifies structure, application choices and various functions2012
IEEE 1702IEEE standard for telephone modem communication protocol to complement the utility industry end device data tablesThis standard provides a “plug and play” environment for the various metering devices that are currently deployed in the field.2011
IEEE 2030IEEE guide for smart grid interoperability of energy technology and information technology operation with the electric power system (EPS), end-use applications, and loadsIEEE 2030 gives the roadmap for attaining smart grid interoperability by a smart grid interoperability reference model (SGIRM). It has the info of the electric power system with emphasis on evaluation criteria, characteristics, etc.2011
ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
ISO/CD 15118-3Road vehicles—Vehicle to grid communication interface—Part 3: Physical and data link layer requirementsThis standard provides the details of PHY and link layer to establish a high-level communication network (wired) between an electric vehicle and a charging station2015
ISO/CD 15118-2Road vehicles—Vehicle-to-grid communication interface—Part 2: Network and application protocol requirementsThis standard discusses the communication establishment between electric vehicles and electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE)2014
ISO/IEC 14908-4Information technology—Control network protocol—Part 4: IP communicationThis standard aims to provide interoperability between different control network protocol (CNP) devices that want to interact over IP networks2012
ISO/IEC 14908-2Information technology—Control network protocol—Part 2: Twisted pair communicationThe CNP free-topology twisted-pair channel for networked control systems in local area control networks is defined in this standard2012
ITU (International Telecommunication Union)
ITU-T G.9960Unified high-speed wireline-based home networking transceivers—System architecture and physical layer specificationThis standard recommends PHY layer functionalities for transceivers in the home network designed for communication using coaxial cables, PLCs, optical fibers, etc. Additionally, this standard specifies reference models and architecture2018
ITU-T G.9903Narrowband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing power line communication transceivers for G3-PLC networksThis standard recommends PHY and link layer specifications for G3-PLC transceivers2017
TIA (Telecommunications Industry Association)
TR-51 Smart utility networksSmart utility network standards are designed to deliver better solutions for bidirectional communication between devices and the service provider’s backhaul systems2012
TR-50 M2M Smart device communicationsThis standard defines interface canons for communication between machine-to-machine (M2M) systems and other smart devices2010
TR-34 Satellite equipment and systemsThis standard emphasis is on satellite communication systems covering both space and terrestrial. The focus of this standard is mainly on (i) the optimal use of spectrum and orbital resources, (ii) spectrum sharing and (iii) interoperability between satellite systems2001
ANSI (American National Standards Institute)
ANSI C12.22The protocol specification for interfacing data communication networksThis standard works to improve the interoperability between various meters and communication units for the data transmission2012
ANSI C12.21The protocol specification for telephone modem communicationThe norms for communicating between a C12.21 device and a C12.21 client via a modem connected to a telephone network are detailed in this standard2006
MultiSpeak
Version 1.1, Version 2.2, Version 3.0, Version 4.x and Version 5.0Standard for fulfilling enterprise application for interoperability at full potentialIt mainly employs (i) common data semantics, (ii) message structure (syntax) and (iii) which messages are needed to support various processes in the business2000
Table 7. Various industrial, scientific and medical bands.
Table 7. Various industrial, scientific and medical bands.
S. NoFrequency RangeAcceptability
16.765–6.795 MHzSubjected to local body regulations
213.553–13.567 MHzGlobally
326.957–27.283 MHzGlobally
440.66–40.7 MHzGlobally
5433.05–434.79 MHzSubjected to local body regulations
6902–928 MHzWith few exceptions
72.4–2.5 GHzGlobally
85.725–5.875 GHzGlobally
924–24.25 GHzGlobally
1061–61.5 GHzSubjected to local body regulations
11122–123 GHzSubjected to local body regulations
12244–246 GHzSubjected to local body regulations
Table 8. Various key issues and challenges for ISM implementation.
Table 8. Various key issues and challenges for ISM implementation.
Issue/ChallengeDescription
System Knowledge
-
Standards applicability
-
Lack of awareness
-
Technology access
-
Typical framework
-
People should endeavor to understand available communication technologies and their usage. Additionally, as the new wireless technologies are emerging day by day, it is always recommended to adopt standards defined by the statutory bodies so that new devices can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure. Some cost-effective and simple technologies have been developed worldwide, but may not be available in many developing and underdeveloped countries.
-
Further, regulatory bodies such as IEEE, ISA, NIST, and IEC have defined various architectures for ISMs. It is very important to understand these architectures before the deployment of ISMs and select a suitable architecture for the location or application; thereby, various components can be interfaced effectively.
System Characteristics
-
System migration
-
Scalability
-
System cost
-
Alerts and alarms
-
Power consumption
-
Energy efficiency
-
Receiver sensitivity
-
Node placement
-
Every few years, new technologies will be evolving in the market. So, transferring the business process resources to a newer hardware/software platform is essential. To move the current application to the new technology to ensure better business value, system migration is required. Additionally, the systems shall be scalable to enhance the business as per the new requirements.
-
On the other side, interoperability of new–old communication systems in an industrial scenario must be considered, where the existing systems may use one type of communication protocol and the newly installed one works on a different protocol. So, the integration and interoperation of these two will be difficult. Protocol converters can be used as a solution, but still there may exist an issue with data misinterpretation in the process of protocol conversion.
-
However, the investment costs for the system deployment with currently available advanced technologies is high. So, this became a constraint for many countries to implement smart distribution power networks.
-
Apart from the automated alerts and alarms, the networks will have to be facilitated with some manual configurations. So, to cater for this requirement, the communication technology shall be easy and understandable to the operators to program the manual alerts when necessary.
-
The quantity of energy utilized per unit of time is referred to as power consumption. It is always desired to establish a communication mechanism with low power consumption for data transmission. Thus, while designing the network components for ISM implementation, power consumption is an important aspect to be considered. As the nodes in the network are powered by batteries, energy efficiency is critical. In particular, when the number of mobile devices increases in the network, energy management will become a major concern. To overcome this issue, solar-powered systems and optimum scheduling algorithms can be used.
-
Receiver sensitivity is the lowest signal level from which the receiver can sense the signal. The receiver with the highest receiver sensitivity will have the capability to receive the weak signals. If the received signal strength is lower than the receiver sensitivity, then the receiver will not receive the data. Some of the key factors that influence sensitivity are thermal noise, signal to noise ratio, and noise figure.
-
In wireless environments, the reception of the signal from the microgrid also depends on the receiver’s location. To receive the best signal, optimum node placement is an important aspect to be considered while implementing the ISMs.
Network Characteristics
-
Channel analysis
-
Network topology
-
Latency
-
Distance coverage
-
Link failures
-
Link budget
-
Spectrum usage
-
Channel is a part of the medium which is used for the establishment of communication between the transmitter and the receiver. Before the connection establishment, it is very important to understand and analyze the channel characteristics, so that modifications can be made to the transmitting signal to ensure minimal losses during the transmission. Suitable channel modelling and selection will have to be conducted in consideration of the distance of coverage.
-
Network topology assists us in better comprehending networking principles. Small-scale network deployments that can adapt to varying levels of traffic have proved to save energy while maintaining great service quality. The network topology should also handle the expansion while responding to areas with varying traffic demands. So, the network topology has a significant impact on performance.
-
High fidelity for emergency operations and islanding while giving instructions to operate control systems appropriately in emergencies (e.g., occurrence of faults, severe disturbances, etc.), the communication medium should be very fast and robust to quickly perform islanding operations. The same has to be ensured when performing operations such as load balancing, demand-/source-side management, demand response, etc. Further, while tracking second-by-second data in the proposed scenarios, such as urban community ISMs, the data available will be huge, and have to be transmitted to central control rooms to take necessary decisions for power exchange. So, handling these big data with effective communication is required.
-
Sometimes, link failures can be observed during the communication; these may occur because of misconfiguration, system vulnerabilities, issues in the channel, etc. A backup mechanism must be taken into consideration during the link failures so that the data can be sent to the destination without any loss.
-
Link budgeting is an accounting of all the power gains and losses that a communication signal encounters. While designing the system, the link budgeting calculations should be carried out properly to receive the signal with a good signal-to-noise ratio. Some of the factors that influence the link budget are antenna losses, terrestrial interferences, etc.
-
The term “spectrum” refers to a range of electromagnetic radio frequencies that are utilized to transmit voice, data, and images. Spectrum is a highly precious resource in wireless communications. Though electromagnetic waves are invisible, their role is crucial. Therefore, spectrum management should be carried out effectively.
Data Capturing and Analysis
-
Bandwidth
-
Data rate
-
Throughput
-
Data fluctuations
-
Data privacy/security
-
While designing an ISM network, the parameter calculations such as bandwidth, data rate and throughput play an important role. These metrics should be managed carefully to maximize the performance of the network.
-
The data would fluctuate greatly due to the unpredictable nature of renewable energy sources. So, sensors have to be well adapted to those changes, which has a great impact on communicating correct information. Additionally, the communication link failures create data loss, which can give wrong or improper data analytics.
-
Data privacy and security should be a part of ISMs’ architecture. The service provider/central coordinator will have the personal information of all the stakeholders of the ISM. It is essential for the service provider to protect the stakeholder’s data. A unauthorized person should never be given control over. Legal frameworks should be maintained.
Table 9. Key applications of AI and ML in power grids.
Table 9. Key applications of AI and ML in power grids.
ObjectivesTechnique UsedKey PointsYearRef.
Power system state classificationSupervised learning using AdaBoostAccuracy, mean square error, false-negative rate, false-positive rate, computational time2011[91]
Future smart gridsAI Two-layer simulation framework was proposed2014[92]
Social network concept to smart gridsSupport vector machine (SVM)Humidity, rainfall, atmospheric pressure, sun time 2014[93]
Energy management system (RLbEMS)Batch Reinforcement LearningEnergy generation, consumer demand, energy prices, characteristics of storage systems were mentioned2015[94]
MAS (Multi-agent system) for power grid communicationAIREQUEST, SUBSCRIBE, CONFIRM, INFORM, and CFP are used2016[95]
Convergence of machine learning and communicationsMachine LearningCommunications, security, privacy2017[96]
Cyber deception assaults FS-based SVM schemeAccuracy and F1 score are used2018[97]
ML techniques for smart grid applicationsSVM, Descriptive Discriminant Analysis, Decision Trees and Neural NetworksPrecession, accuracy, linearity, training time, frequency of use, etc.2018[98]
Various security concernsBig data and ML techniques Various attacks such as spoofing, tampering, information disclosure, etc.2019[99]
Deep learning in smart gridsDeep learningFeature extraction and handling a huge amount of data2019[100]
Table 10. Comparison of key parameters of Sigfox, NB-IoT, and LoRa technologies.
Table 10. Comparison of key parameters of Sigfox, NB-IoT, and LoRa technologies.
FeatureSigfoxNB-IoTLoRaWAN
Operating Frequency868 to 869 MHz and 902 to 928 MHz (depending on region)LTE Frequency BandsIN865-867, US902-928, EU433 and EU863-870 (depends on region)
Licensed/Unlicensed bandUnlicensed bandLicensed BandUnlicensed band
Type of modulationBPSKQPSKCSS
Bandwidth100 Hz200 kHz125 kHz, 200 kHz
Coverage3–10 km (Urban)
30–50 km (Rural)
1–5 km (Urban)
10–15 km (Rural)
2–5 km (Urban)
15–20 km (Rural)
Standard developed bySigfox in collaboration with ETSI3GPPLoRa Alliance (Network)
Data rate100 bps200 kbps50 kbps (adaptive)
Sensitivity to interference HighLowHigh
Network setupBy operatorBy operatorIndividual can setup their own networks
Table 11. Key works developed using LoRa technology.
Table 11. Key works developed using LoRa technology.
Objectives/TechnologyKey PointsYearReference
Relay network based on LoRaForwarding scheme based on broadcast scheduling is discussed2020[115]
Multi-hop relay and Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) Packet delivery rate is significantly improved with the help of multi-hop2020[116]
Coverage test for LoRaRange is tested, on road (15 km) and on water (close to 30 km)2015[117]
Investigation on capacity limits of LoRaData Extraction Rate (DER)and Network Energy Consumption (NEC) are used2016[118]
Chirp Spread Spectrum (CSS)BER, range and coexistence are discussed2016[119]
Review on LPWANAll the technologies and standards in the LPWAN are discussed2017[13]
Bidirectional traffic
in LoRaWAN
Duty cycle limitations, energy consumption, and reliability tradeoffs are discussed2017[120]
LoRa scalabilityPerformance of the network with respect to scalability is discussed2017[121]
Mathematical model of LoRaWANPacket error rate (PER) dependency with load is discussed2017[122]
Evaluating the sub-gigahertz wireless technologiesImprovement of LoRa message delivery ratio over Wi-Fi2017[123]
LoRaWAN channel modelling A general model is developed which can be used to evaluate the performance of LoRaWAN2017[124]
LoRaWAN based AMILoRa WAN BTS location measures RSSI2017[49]
Improving LoRa performance with CSMACSMA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access), an enhancement to LoRaWAN that lowers the collision ratio is discussed2018[125]
LoRaWAN module is developed in NS-3Class A type and LoRaWAN 1.0 are considered2018[126]
Channel modelling on the IIUM campusMeasurement tests of three different scenarios for both LOS and NLOS links conducted2018[127]
Performance evaluation of LoRa for different scenariosSeveral scenarios for urban, suburban, and rural are considered2018[128]
Scalability concerns of CSSCollisions and packet error rates are used to describe the effect2019[129]
E-Metering with LoRaA smart water distribution system is implemented where each meter is connected to a mote2019[130]
Radio propagation modelsThe path loss model was considered2019[131]
S-Aloha on LoRaWANNetwork throughput is improved2019[132]
Bridge between IoT and smart gridTo check the feasibility of the APP, experiments were performed in 81 locations, from the PER values, APP is tested2019[52]
Modelling, characterization and measurement of LoRaEnergy consumption, characteristics, and coverage are discussed2020[73]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reddy, G.P.; Kumar, Y.V.P.; Chakravarthi, M.K. Communication Technologies for Interoperable Smart Microgrids in Urban Energy Community: A Broad Review of the State of the Art, Challenges, and Research Perspectives. Sensors 2022, 22, 5881. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155881

AMA Style

Reddy GP, Kumar YVP, Chakravarthi MK. Communication Technologies for Interoperable Smart Microgrids in Urban Energy Community: A Broad Review of the State of the Art, Challenges, and Research Perspectives. Sensors. 2022; 22(15):5881. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reddy, Gogulamudi Pradeep, Yellapragada Venkata Pavan Kumar, and Maddikera Kalyan Chakravarthi. 2022. "Communication Technologies for Interoperable Smart Microgrids in Urban Energy Community: A Broad Review of the State of the Art, Challenges, and Research Perspectives" Sensors 22, no. 15: 5881. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155881

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop