Next Article in Journal
Sensors for Context-Aware Smart Healthcare: A Security Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Joint Sparsity for TomoSAR Imaging in Urban Areas Using Building POI and TerraSAR-X Staring Spotlight Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Autoencoder-Based Deep Learning Approach for Load Identification in Structural Dynamics
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Two-Step Approach to Processing Raw Strain Monitoring Data for Damage Detection of Structures under Operational Conditions

Sensors 2021, 21(20), 6887; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206887
by Peng Ren 1,* and Zhi Zhou 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2021, 21(20), 6887; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206887
Submission received: 13 September 2021 / Revised: 14 October 2021 / Accepted: 14 October 2021 / Published: 17 October 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper presents a two-step approach to successively processing the raw strain monitoring data, consisting of the wavelet-based initial feature extraction step and the decoupling step to draw damage indicators. Principal component analysis and a low-rank property-based subspace projection method are adopted as two alternative decoupling methodologies.

The approach’s feasibility and robustness are substantiated by analyzing strain monitoring data from a customized truss experiment to successfully remove the masking effects of operating loads and identify local damages even concerning accommodating situations of missing data and limited measuring points.

In general, the paper is well-written. I have the following comments to improve the paper.

  1. It needs to be supplemented to explain whether the proposed method can achieve damage location and quantitative indication at the same time.
  2. What are the input variables and output variables in principal component analysis?
  3. The equation or expression of the new damage indicator (DI) should be given clearly in the paper.
  4. In actual engineering, which type of engineering structures can the proposed method be applied to?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Notes in the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Very well written paper, I would like to see further discussion in the results - In my opinion it can be improved in this section. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop