Next Article in Journal
Fluviograph Design Based on an Ultra-Small Pressure Sensor
Next Article in Special Issue
Noncontact Detection of Respiration Rate Based on Forward Scatter Radar
Previous Article in Journal
Fault Detection and Diagnosis Using Combined Autoencoder and Long Short-Term Memory Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
3D Simulations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Detection Using Broadband Microwave Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Single-Connector Stent Antenna for Intravascular Monitoring Applications

Mechanical Engineering Department, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(21), 4616; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214616
Submission received: 8 August 2019 / Revised: 30 September 2019 / Accepted: 22 October 2019 / Published: 23 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microwave Sensors for Biomedical Applications)

Abstract

:
Recently, smart stents have been developed by integrating various sensors with intravascular stents for detecting vascular restenosis or monitoring intravascular biomedical conditions such as blood pressure or blood flow velocity. The information on biomedical signals is then transmitted to external monitoring systems via wireless communications. Due to the limited volumes of blood vessels and limited influence of blood flow, antennas with good radiation performance are required for intravascular applications. In this paper, we propose a stent antenna composed of multiple rings containing crowns and struts, where each ring is connected with one connector. Unlike a conventional stent, wherein each ring is connected with several connectors, the single connector prevents the random distribution of electrical current and thus achieves good radiation performance. The implantable stent antenna is designed for the frequency range of 2 to 3 GHz for minimum penetration loss in the human body and tissues. Mechanical FEM simulations were conducted to ensure that the mechanical deformation was within specific limits during balloon expansions. A prototype was fabricated with laser cutting techniques and its radiation performance experimentally characterized. It was demonstrated that the fabricated stent antenna had an omnidirectional radiation pattern for arbitrary receiving angles, a gain of 1.38 dBi, and a radiation efficiency of 74.5% at a resonant frequency of 2.07 GHz. The main contribution of this work was the manipulation of the current distributions of the stent for good EM radiation performances which needed to be further examined while inserted inside human bodies. These research results should contribute to the further development of implantable wireless communications and intravascular monitoring of biomedical signals such as blood pressure and blood flow velocity.

1. Introduction

In past decades, intravascular stents have been widely used in the medical treatment of vessel obstructions for patients with vascular diseases such as stroke, heart attack, and aneurysm [1,2]. Stents are essentially wire meshes inserted into narrow blood vessels via a catheter and medical surgery. The narrow parts of the blood vessels are expanded by balloons to restore regular blood flow. However, the long-term usage of stents inside the blood vessels leads to vascular restenosis (i.e., vessel re-narrowing) due to the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells [3]. The re-narrowing of blood vessels hinders the blood flow and can cause severe problems. These issues can be alleviated by eluting drugs [4,5], manipulating shear stresses on the vessel walls [6], or heating the re-narrowing regions to suppress the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells [7,8].
For early diagnosis of restenosis and real-time monitoring of intravascular blood conditions, smart stents or intelligent stents have been developed by integrating versatile sensors and wireless electronic systems with stents, as shown in Figure 1 [9,10]. For example, pressure sensors are used to measure intravascular blood pressure [9,11,12,13,14,15,16], multiple pressure sensors are used to measure the pulse wave velocity (PWV) [17], flow sensors can provide blood flow velocity [2,18,19], and other embedded sensors are utilized to monitor glucose [20] and temperature [19]. In fact, measuring blood pressure intravascularly, directly from blood vessels, provides accurate and real-time values of blood pressure that are superior to those of non-invasive blood-pressure approaches such as ultrasound [21], the volume-clamp method [22]. These sensors mounted on the stents should have low profiles and small sizes to avoid potential obstacles for regular blood flows [12]. The measured intravascular signals can be signal-processed by embedded microprocessors or transmitted to external monitoring systems via wireless communications [11,23].
In general, intravascular stents are small in size, ranging in length from 12 to 38 mm and in diameter from 2 to 10 mm. Thus, it is necessary to miniaturize implantable electronic devices and communication systems. Various wireless power/data communications approaches for smart stents have been investigated, including passive LC-resonant antennas [7,8,9,12,17,24,25,26], miniaturized packaged antennas [20], RFIC [11], and active stent antennas [10,14,15,19,23]. LC-resonant antennas are composed of metallic stents acting as inductors and additional capacitors forming LC resonant circuits. Via strong magnetic field couplings with external loop antennas and the phase dip technique, the intravascular information can be obtained through the variations of the resonant frequencies. However, one disadvantage of LC resonant antennas is that the active regions of the transmitting loop antennas should be overlapped with the receiving inductive stents for strong magnetic-field couplings [17]. In some circumstances, it is difficult to locate coronary artery stents by the commonly used CT angiography [27] or MRI [28]. However, the whole stent can be considered as an antenna for receiving electromagnetic signals and power from transmitting antennas at arbitrary angles [23]. For stent antennas, the requirements that need to be met are long-term usage, biocompatibility, electrical conduction, and radial expansion capability, as well as structural integrity after expansion to prevent the influence of blood flow.
In this paper, we propose a stent antenna for intravascular monitoring and implantable wireless applications. The stent antenna was expected to have better radiation performance than that of LC resonant antennas at low frequencies, such as 900 MHz [19]. Modern stents are composed of open cells, each unit is composed of crowns and struts, and each ring is connected by multiple connectors [29]. However, this design would cause random current distribution and reduce radiation performance. The goal of this work was to design a stent antenna with good radiation performance by using a single connector between each unit of the stent. The single-connector stent antenna eliminates the complicated and meandering geometry of a typical stent, which would cancel out the induced currents and be unable to excite the desired electromagnetic waves. In addition, a stent with single connectors should maintain a stable mechanical structure and not exceed fracture limits during balloon expansion [1]. The single-connector stent antenna could be applied to other vessels and not limited to coronary arteries.
This paper is organized as follows. In the next section, the design of the proposed stent antenna and its operation frequency are presented. Then, the EM and FEM simulations determining the electrical properties and mechanical FEM simulations for verifying the mechanical properties are described. Subsequently, the laser-cutting fabrication process and balloon expansions of prototypes are disclosed. Finally, the radiation characteristics of the fabricated stent antenna are measured in an anechoic chamber and discussed. Important results are summarized at the end of the paper.

2. Designs

Figure 2a presents the 2D unfolded planar geometry of a multi-connector stent. In general, multi-connector stents are composed of several rings connected by connectors with cylindrical shapes for providing sufficient radial force to open narrowed blood vessels [5,24]. Each ring consists of crowns and struts, and the crowns are circular so that they can expand and achieve large deformation under balloon expansions. Most commercially available multi-connector stents have two to three connectors between adjacent rings to achieve the desired structural stability [30,31]. However, these multiple connectors can lead to random current distributions and are not suitable for antenna applications. In this paper, we propose a single-connector stent antenna having adjacent rings connected by a single connector, as shown in Figure 2b. A single-connector stent antenna can allow current distribution with an approximate half-wavelength resonant mode. The current distributions will be discussed in the next section. Figure 3a,b presents the 3D geometries of a multi-connector and the proposed single-connector stent antennas where undesired connectors are not connected.
For implantable antennas, the resonant frequency of the stent antenna depends on the total length of the stent and its geometry. In fact, in the human body, electromagnetic waves (EM) have different penetration attenuations and variable power loss boundaries at different frequencies [23,32]. For low-frequency electromagnetic coupling communications, the optimal operation frequency is in the MHz range for low tissue absorption loss where the biological tissues are modeled as dispersive medium and results in large sizes of implanted antennas [23]. For high-frequency wireless communications, the human body is modeled as a low-loss multi-layer dielectric medium and the optimal frequency is in the range from 2 to 3 GHz for the minimum tissue absorptions and good orientation tolerances of implanted antennas [32]. Therefore, the single-connector stent antenna was designed to have a resonant frequency in the range of 2 to 3 GHz that the total length of the surface current flow path shown in Figure 2b was close to a half wavelength expressed as
( Strut   Length + Crown   Length + Connector   Length ) × ( Ring   Number ) λ 2
where λ was the wavelength of the first resonance. The strut length, crown length, and connector length are the lengths of the strut, crown, and connector shown in Figure 2. Furthermore, the length should be in the range of 10 to 20 mm, and the diameter, in the range of 2 to 10 mm due to the sizes of vessels [7,8]. In addition, this frequency range falls in the range of the ISM band, and a high operation frequency is beneficial for implantable antennas [23]. The final dimensions of the single-connector stent antenna were a length of 18 mm, 6 crowns, 9 rings, and a final diameter of 2 mm when inserted into blood vessels, as shown in Figure 4 and Table 1. For comparison, a multi-connector stent antenna and an old helix-shaped stent antenna of the same size were also investigated. The helical stent antenna had 9 turns within the same total length of 18 mm.
In this research, we employed the commonly used L-605 Cobalt-Chromium (Co-Cr) alloy as the material for all the stents because Co-Cr alloy has a smaller minimum thickness than conventional stainless steel [1]. As a ductile material, Co-Cr alloy has a Young’s modulus of 203 GPa, a Poisson’s ratio of 0.3, yield stress of 590 MPa, and ultimate strength of 1689 MPa.

3. Simulations

3.1. EM FEM Simulations

To investigate the EM properties of stent antennas, full-wave EM simulations were conducted to study the surface currents and radiation patterns with commercial software, CST Microwave Studio. Figure 5 shows the surface current distributions at the resonant frequency of the helical, multi-connector, and single-connector stent antennas. Most stent antennas had an issue of small ground planes due to limited small volumes of blood vessels [10,23]. Similarly, we used SMA connectors with finite ground planes for power extractions. It could be improved by combining two stent antennas to form a dipole-like antenna [23]. The multi-connector stent antenna had three connectors, and the random current flowed throughout the entire stent. In the single-connector stent antenna, there was a major current flow path between each ring, resulting in an approximate half-wavelength resonant mode similar to that of the helical stent antenna with a relatively small ground plane. Therefore, the single-connector stent antenna and the helical stent antenna had similar resonant frequencies, as can be observed from the simulated reflection coefficients in Figure 6. Since the multi-connector stent antenna had random current distribution, it had a higher resonant frequency with the same dimensions. This result supported that a single-connector stent antenna is suitable for stent antennas.

3.2. Mechanical FEM Simulations

To verify that the mechanical properties of the stent antennas fulfilled the requirements, mechanical finite element simulations were conducted in commercial software, ABAQUS (Dassault System Simulia Corp., Velizy Villacoublay, France). In accordance with the practical balloon expansion processes of stents, a cylindrical stent with an initial diameter of 1.5 mm was expanded to a diameter of 2.2 mm to simulate balloon expansion, as shown in Figure 7 [33]. Then the oversized stent was compressed to the desired diameter of 2 mm to simulate the radial force of the blood vessel walls. The simulated Von-Mises stress distributions of the multi-connector and single-connector stents are shown in Figure 8. In general, coronary stents use ductile materials that can achieve large deformation during balloon expansion [34]. They obey the Von-Mises stress criterion, expressed as
σ v o n m i s e s = [ ( σ 1 σ 2 ) 2 + ( σ 2 σ 3 ) 2 + ( σ 3 σ 1 ) 2 ] 1 2 2 σ y
where σ 1 , σ 2 , and σ 3 are principle stresses. The Von-Mises stress criterion indicates that ductile stents may fracture if the maximum Von-Mises stress exceeds the ultimate strength. The maximum Von-Mises stresses of the multi-connector and single connector stents in this research were lower than the ultimate strength of 1689 MPa of Co-Cr alloy. In other words, both stents had suitable mechanical properties for balloon expansions. In addition, the effect of removing the connector was described in Figure 9. If the connector was completely removed, it caused a longer longitudinal deformation, L2, than the original length of the connector, L1, resulting in undesired longitudinal elongations. This could be modified via partially removing the connector shown in Figure 9b that the deformed length, L3, was shorter than L2. Therefore, the trade-off design of the single connector was to sacrifice the longitudinal elongation and gain a better radiation efficiency.

4. Fabrication

Two prototypes of single-connector and multi-connector stents were fabricated via laser cutting of cylindrical Co-Cr alloy hypotubes. To pattern 2D unfolded geometries on the surfaces of the hypotubes, a 30W Nd-YAG pulse type fiber optical laser (Rofin) and an XY movement platform (Aerotech position) with precise position controls were employed. The details of the fabrication processes are reported in [1]. Figure 10 presents photographs of the fabricated multi-connector and single-connector stent antennas connected with SMA connectors for measurements. High-resolution photographs of the fabricated multi-connector and single-connector stent antennas viewed under an optical microscope are shown in Figure 11. In the single-connector stent antenna, each ring was connected via a single connector, and undesired connectors were not connected, as highlighted with a red box.

5. Measurements

5.1. Reflection Coefficients

The reflection coefficients of the fabricated single-connector and multi-connector stent antennas were measured with a calibrated vector network analyzer (Agilent E5071C). To reduce the effect of the feed line, an RF choke (Jin Hua Electronic Co., LTD, model: 2030000001866, Taipei, Taiwan) was utilized during the measurements. Figure 12 shows the simulated and measured reflection coefficients of both stent antennas. The resonant frequency of the single-connector stent antenna was lower than that of the multi-connector stent antenna of the same length. The simulation results matched the measured results, and the slight discrepancy was due to fabrication errors and tolerances.

5.2. Far-field Radiation Characteristics

The 3D far-field radiation patterns were measured in the anechoic chamber at the Joint Laboratory for Microwave and Millimeter Wave Antenna Measurements at National Taiwan University of Science and Technology. Figure 13 shows the measurement setup. The stent antenna was mounted on a rotating stage and acted as a receiving antenna, and the probe antenna, which acted as a transmitting antenna, moved in the azimuth and elevation planes. The measured gain radiation patterns are shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15. Note that the measured radiation patterns at 180° were inaccurate due to the measurement setup where the transmitting antenna couldn’t move to the position underneath the stent antenna.
Figure 14a,b shows the simulated and measured gain radiation patterns of the multi-connector stent antenna at a resonant frequency of 2.97 GHz in the E- and H-planes, respectively. Similarly, Figure 15a,b shows the simulated and measured gain radiation patterns of the single-connector stent antenna at a resonant frequency of 2.07 GHz in the E- and H-planes, respectively. It can be seen that the radiation efficiency of the single-connector stent antenna was superior to that of the multi-resonant stent antenna due to its approximate half-wavelength resonant mode shown in Table 2. Although the multi-connector stent had a larger gain compared to that of the single-connector stent, both stent-based antennas had donut-shaped radiation patterns with omnidirectional radiation in the azimuth plane, which would be suitable for arbitrary receiving angles. Figure 16 shows the gain and the radiation efficiency of the single-connector stent antenna at different frequencies. It was demonstrated that the highest radiation efficiency of the single-connector stent antenna was 74.5% at the resonant frequency of 2.07 GHz, with a corresponding gain of 1.38 dBi. It indicated that a single-connector stent could provide the maximum radiation efficiency and omnidirectional electromagnetic emissions for intravascular wireless communications.

6. Discussions

In this research, we proposed a single-connector stent antenna composed of the stent and SMA connectors for good radiation efficiencies. The SMA connector acted as a finite ground plane. The simulation results showed that the entire stent antenna had a half-wavelength current distribution shown in Figure 5 and a dipole-link radiation pattern shown in Figure 14. For all measurements conducted in this research, an RF choke was exploited to reduce the effects of the feed line and only considered the stent antenna. The measured radiation pattern demonstrated a dipole-link radiation pattern as expected shown in Figure 14. The discrepancy between the simulated and measured radiation patterns at 180° was due to the measuring equipment that the receiving antenna cannot move underneath the stent antenna and cannot measure the EM radiation at 180°.

7. Conclusions

In this paper, we present a stent antenna for intravascular monitoring and implantable wireless applications that employ the entire stent as an antenna. The main contribution of this work was the manipulation of the current distributions of the stent for good radiation performance with a short stent length by exploiting a single connector between each unit of the stent. Unlike a general stent, wherein each unit is connected with multiple connectors, our proposed stent can achieve good EM radiation, maintain good mechanical strength, and remain within fracture limits during balloon expansions. A prototype was designed, fabricated, and experimentally examined with an EM anechoic chamber. The fabricated stent antenna demonstrated an omnidirectional radiation pattern, a gain of 1.38 dBi, and a radiation efficiency of 74.5% at the resonant frequency of 2.07 GHz. The results of this research should contribute to the development of implantable wireless communications and intravascular monitoring of cardiovascular diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-H.L., S.-C.C., and H.-M.H.; Data curation, S.-C.C.; Investigation, C.-H.L., S.-C.C., and H.-M.H.; Project administration, C.-H.L.; Software, S.-C.C.; Supervision, C.-H.L.; Validation, H.-M.H.; Writing – original draft, C.-H.L. and H.-M.H.; Writing – review & editing, C.-H.L. and H.-M.H.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under grant No. 106-2221-E-002-219-MY2 and 108-2221-E-002-165.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yao-Joe Yang from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at National Taiwan University for valuable discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huang, B.-H.; Li, D.-R.; Chen, Y.-C.; Hsiao, H.-M. Application of a Precision Mobile Platform on an Innovative Intracranial Aneurysm Spherical Stent. Smart Sci. 2014, 2, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Howe, C.; Mishra, S.; Kim, Y.-S.; Chen, Y.; Ye, S.-H.; Wagner, W.R.; Jeong, J.-W.; Byun, H.-S.; Kim, J.-H.; Chun, Y.; et al. Stretchable, Implantable, Nanostructured Flow-Diverter System for Quantification of Intra-Aneurysmal Hemodynamics. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 8706–8716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lowe, H.C.; Oesterle, S.N.; Khachigian, L.M. Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Current Status and Future Strategies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, W.; Habraken, T.C.J.; Hennink, W.E.; Kok, R.J. Polymer-Free Drug-Eluting Stents: An Overview of Coating Strategies and Comparison with Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents. Bioconj. Chem. 2015, 26, 1277–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, Y.T.; Wang, Y.P.; Lin, T.Y.; Lin, C.E.; Hsiao, H.M. Drug-Eluting Stent with Rhombic-Shape Reservoirs for Drug Delivery. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), Okinawa, Japan, 26–30 May 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hsiao, H.-M.; Lin, C.-H.; Liao, Y.-C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Wang, T.-W. Hemodynamic Behavior of Coronary Stents in Straight and Curved Arteries. Curr. Nanosci. 2014, 10, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, Y.; Dahmardeh, M.; Chen, X.; Takahata, K. Selective RF Heating of Resonant Stent toward Wireless Endohyperthermia for Restenosis Inhibition. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), San Francisco, CA, USA, 26–30 January 2014; pp. 877–880. [Google Scholar]
  8. Luo, Y.; Chen, X.; Dahmardeh, M.; Takahata, K. RF-Powered Stent with Integrated Circuit Breaker for Safeguarded Wireless Hyperthermia Treatment. J. Microelectromec. Syst. 2015, 24, 1293–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, X.; Brox, D.; Assadsangabi, B.; Hsiang, Y.; Takahata, K. Intelligent Telemetric Stent for Wireless Monitoring of Intravascular Pressure and Its in Vivo Testing. Biomed. Microdevices 2014, 16, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chow, E.Y.; Beier, B.L.; Francino, A.; Chappell, W.J.; Irazoqui, P.P. Toward an Implantable Wireless Cardiac Monitoring Platform Integrated with an FDA-Approved Cardiovascular Stent. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2009, 22, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chow, E.Y.; Chlebowski, A.L.; Chakraborty, S.; Chappell, W.J.; Irazoqui, P.P. Fully Wireless Implantable Cardiovascular Pressure Monitor Integrated with a Medical Stent. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57, 1487–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bulbul, A.; Tandar, A.; Patel, A.; Kim, H. Micro Hydraulic Pressure Sensing Stent. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS), Anchorage, AK, USA, 21–25 June 2015; pp. 105–108. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gulari, M.N.; Ghannad-Rezaie, M.; Novelli, P.; Chronis, N.; Marentis, T.C. An Implantable X-Ray-Based Blood Pressure Microsensor for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Surveillance and Prevention. J. Microelectromec. Syst. 2015, 24, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, X.; Assadsangabi, B.; Brox, D.; Hsiang, Y.; Takahata, K. A Pressure-Sensing Smart Stent Compatible with Angioplasty Procedure and Its in Vivo Testing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 30th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 22–26 January 2017; pp. 133–136. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, X.; Assadsangabi, B.; Hsiang, Y.; Takahata, K. Enabling Angioplasty-Ready “Smart” Stents to Detect In-Stent Restenosis and Occlusion. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Park, J.; Kim, J.-K.; Patil, S.J.; Park, J.-K.; Park, S.; Lee, D.-W. A Wireless Pressure Sensor Integrated with a Biodegradable Polymer Stent for Biomedical Applications. Sensors 2016, 16, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schachtele, J. On the Design of Passive Resonant Circuits to Measure Local Pulse Wave Velocity in a Stent. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2016, 10, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Miguel, J.A.; Lechuga, Y.; Mozuelos, R.; Martínez, M. Implantable Sensor System for Remote Detection of a Restenosis Condition. In Proceedings of the 4th Doctoral Conference on Computing, Electrical and Industrial Systems (DoCEIS), Costa de Caparica, Portugal, 15–17 April 2013; pp. 164–171. [Google Scholar]
  19. Son, D.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.J.; Ghaffari, R.; Yun, S.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, J.E.; Cho, H.R.; Yoon, S.; Yang, S.; et al. Bioresorbable Electronic Stent Integrated with Therapeutic Nanoparticles for Endovascular Diseases. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 5937–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jang, H.; Na, K.; Bien, F. A Stent Based In-Vivo Bio-Sensing System for Glucose Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Radio-Frequency Integration Technology (RFIT), Taipei, Taiwan, 24–26 August 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, C.; Li, X.; Hu, H.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Z.; Lin, M.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, Z.; Huang, B.; Gong, H.; et al. Monitoring of the Central Blood Pressure Waveform via a Conformal Ultrasonic Device. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 2, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Berkelmans, G.F.N.; Kuipers, S.; Westerhof, B.E.; Spoelstra-de Man, A.M.E.; Smulders, Y.M. Comparing Volume-Clamp Method and Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Admitted to the Intensive or Medium Care Unit. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2018, 32, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chow, E.Y.; Ouyang, Y.; Beier, B.; Chappell, W.J.; Irazoqui, P.P. Evaluation of Cardiovascular Stents as Antennas for Implantable Wireless Applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2009, 57, 2523–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mohammadi, A.R.; Mohamed Ali, M.S.; Lappin, D.; Schlosser, C.; Takahata, K. Inductive Antenna Stent: Design, Fabrication and Characterization. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2013, 23, 025015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Occhiuzzi, C.; Contri, G.; Marrocco, G. Design of Implanted RFID Tags for Passive Sensing of Human Body: The STENTag. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 3146–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cai, M.; Sobot, R.; Mirabbasi, S. A 32-ΜW Programmable Crystal-Less Event-Driven Receiver for Miniaturized Biomedical Implants. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Florence, Italy, 27–30 May 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ebersberger, U.; Tricarico, F.; Schoepf, U.J.; Blanke, P.; Spears, J.R.; Rowe, G.W.; Halligan, W.T.; Henzler, T.; Bamberg, F.; Leber, A.W.; et al. CT Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stents with Iterative Image Reconstruction: Improvements in Image Quality and Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction. Eur. Radiol. 2013, 23, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rasche, V.; Oberhuber, A.; Trumpp, S.; Bornstedt, A.; Orend, K.-H.; Merkle, N.; Rottbauer, W.; Hoffmann, M. MRI Assessment of Thoracic Stent Grafts after Emergency Implantation in Multi Trauma Patients: A Feasibility Study. Eur. Radiol. 2011, 21, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ruygrok, P.N.; Serruys, P.W. Intracoronary Stenting. Circulation 1996, 94, 882–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hsiao, H.-M.; Chiu, Y.-H.; Lee, K.-H.; Lin, C.-H. Computational Modeling of Effects of Intravascular Stent Design on Key Mechanical and Hemodynamic Behavior. Comput. Aided Des. 2012, 44, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hsiao, H.; Lee, K.; Liao, Y.; Cheng, Y. Cardiovascular Stent Design and Wall Shear Stress Distribution in Coronary Stented Arteries. Micro. Nano. Lett. 2012, 7, 430–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Poon, A.S.Y.; O’Driscoll, S.; Meng, T.H. Optimal Frequency for Wireless Power Transmission into Dispersive Tissue. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2010, 58, 1739–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hsiao, H.-M.; Chien, A.; Huang, B.-H.; Li, D.-R.; Chen, H.; Ko, C.-Y. Biomedical Engineering, Smart Drug Delivery system; Intech: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hsiao, H.-M.; Lin, C.-H.; Shen, Y.-K.; Chou, T.-Y.; Hsu, Y.-Y. Rhombic-Shaped Channel Stent with Enhanced Drug Capacity and Fatigue Life. Micromachines 2018, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of a smart stent wherein the entire stent acts as an antenna for transferring biomedical information measured via integrated sensors to the external monitoring system.
Figure 1. Illustration of a smart stent wherein the entire stent acts as an antenna for transferring biomedical information measured via integrated sensors to the external monitoring system.
Sensors 19 04616 g001
Figure 2. 2D planar geometries of (a) multi-connector, and (b) single-connector stent antennas. The red boxes indicate that a connector is disconnected between two adjacent rings. The red arrows indicate the surface current flow path at the resonant frequency.
Figure 2. 2D planar geometries of (a) multi-connector, and (b) single-connector stent antennas. The red boxes indicate that a connector is disconnected between two adjacent rings. The red arrows indicate the surface current flow path at the resonant frequency.
Sensors 19 04616 g002
Figure 3. 3D topologies of (a) multi-connector and (b) single-connector stent antennas.
Figure 3. 3D topologies of (a) multi-connector and (b) single-connector stent antennas.
Sensors 19 04616 g003
Figure 4. 3D topologies of the final design of (a) helical stent, (b) regular multi-connector stent, and (c) single-connector stent.
Figure 4. 3D topologies of the final design of (a) helical stent, (b) regular multi-connector stent, and (c) single-connector stent.
Sensors 19 04616 g004
Figure 5. The simulated surface current distributions of the (a) helical stent, (b) multi-connector stent, and (c) single-connector stent antennas. At the resonant frequency, the multi-connector stent antenna has a radon current path where the helical and single-connector stent antennas have half-wavelength resonant modes. The red dashed box indicates the locations of the maximum current.
Figure 5. The simulated surface current distributions of the (a) helical stent, (b) multi-connector stent, and (c) single-connector stent antennas. At the resonant frequency, the multi-connector stent antenna has a radon current path where the helical and single-connector stent antennas have half-wavelength resonant modes. The red dashed box indicates the locations of the maximum current.
Sensors 19 04616 g005
Figure 6. Simulated reflection coefficients of the helical stent, multi-connector stent, and single-connector stent antennas.
Figure 6. Simulated reflection coefficients of the helical stent, multi-connector stent, and single-connector stent antennas.
Sensors 19 04616 g006
Figure 7. The cross-sectional view of the cylindrical stent for simulating the expansion process, including the initial state, the expansion due to the balloon, and the radial force exerted by the blood vessel.
Figure 7. The cross-sectional view of the cylindrical stent for simulating the expansion process, including the initial state, the expansion due to the balloon, and the radial force exerted by the blood vessel.
Sensors 19 04616 g007
Figure 8. The simulated Von-Mises stress distributions of the (a) multi-connector, and (b) single-connector stent antennas via mechanical FEM simulations.
Figure 8. The simulated Von-Mises stress distributions of the (a) multi-connector, and (b) single-connector stent antennas via mechanical FEM simulations.
Sensors 19 04616 g008
Figure 9. The comparisons of the single-connector stent antennas when the connector was (a) completely removed, and (b) partially removed.
Figure 9. The comparisons of the single-connector stent antennas when the connector was (a) completely removed, and (b) partially removed.
Sensors 19 04616 g009
Figure 10. Photographs of the fabricated (a) multi-connector stent, and (b) single-connector stent placed vertically.
Figure 10. Photographs of the fabricated (a) multi-connector stent, and (b) single-connector stent placed vertically.
Sensors 19 04616 g010
Figure 11. High-resolution photographs of the (a) multi-connector, and (b) single-connector stent antennas taken under an optical microscope.
Figure 11. High-resolution photographs of the (a) multi-connector, and (b) single-connector stent antennas taken under an optical microscope.
Sensors 19 04616 g011
Figure 12. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the multi-connector and single-connector stent antennas.
Figure 12. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the multi-connector and single-connector stent antennas.
Sensors 19 04616 g012
Figure 13. (a) Illustration of the measurement setup for 3D far-field radiation measurements, (b) The anechoic chamber, (c) The stent antenna mounted on a rotating stage to act as a receiving antenna.
Figure 13. (a) Illustration of the measurement setup for 3D far-field radiation measurements, (b) The anechoic chamber, (c) The stent antenna mounted on a rotating stage to act as a receiving antenna.
Sensors 19 04616 g013
Figure 14. The gain patterns of the multi-connector stent antenna in (a) the E-plane, and (b) the H-plane.
Figure 14. The gain patterns of the multi-connector stent antenna in (a) the E-plane, and (b) the H-plane.
Sensors 19 04616 g014
Figure 15. The gain patterns of the single-connector stent antenna in (a) the E-plane, and (b) the H-plane.
Figure 15. The gain patterns of the single-connector stent antenna in (a) the E-plane, and (b) the H-plane.
Sensors 19 04616 g015
Figure 16. The measured gain and radiation efficiency of the single-connector stent antenna.
Figure 16. The measured gain and radiation efficiency of the single-connector stent antenna.
Sensors 19 04616 g016
Table 1. The geometric parameters of three stent antennas.
Table 1. The geometric parameters of three stent antennas.
Stent AntennaL (mm)OD (mm)Crown NumberRing NumberTurn Number
Single18269×
Multi18269×
Helix182××9
Table 2. The radiation characteristics of the stent antennas.
Table 2. The radiation characteristics of the stent antennas.
Stent antennaGain (dBi)Directivity (dBi)Efficiency (%)
Multi4.946.52769.5
Single1.382.66174.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.-H.; Chen, S.-C.; Hsiao, H.-M. A Single-Connector Stent Antenna for Intravascular Monitoring Applications. Sensors 2019, 19, 4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214616

AMA Style

Liu C-H, Chen S-C, Hsiao H-M. A Single-Connector Stent Antenna for Intravascular Monitoring Applications. Sensors. 2019; 19(21):4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214616

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Chien-Hao, Shuo-Chih Chen, and Hao-Ming Hsiao. 2019. "A Single-Connector Stent Antenna for Intravascular Monitoring Applications" Sensors 19, no. 21: 4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214616

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop