Next Article in Journal
Additions to the Knowledge of Corticioid Xylodon (Schizoporaceae, Hymenochaetales): Introducing Three New Xylodon Species from Southern China
Next Article in Special Issue
Perspectives in Earthworm Molecular Phylogeny: Recent Advances in Lumbricoidea and Standing Questions
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Use of Autonomous Reef Monitoring Structures (ARMS) for Describing the Species Diversity of Two Coral Reefs in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Five New Earthworm Mitogenomes (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae): Mitochondrial Phylogeny of Lumbricidae

1
College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2021, 13(11), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110580
Submission received: 20 September 2021 / Revised: 7 November 2021 / Accepted: 9 November 2021 / Published: 14 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Earthworms)

Abstract

:
Identification based on conventional morphological characteristics is typically difficult and time-consuming. The development of molecular techniques provides a novel strategy that relies on specific mitochondrial gene fragments to conduct authentication. For this study, five newly sequenced partial mitogenomes of earthworms (Bimastos parvus, Dendrobaena octaedra, Eisenia andrei, Eisenia nordenskioldi, and Octolasion tyrtaeum) with lengths ranging from 14,977 to 15,715 were presented. Each mitogenome possessed a putative control region that resided between tRNA-Arg and tRNA-His. All of the PCGs were under negative selection according to the value of Ka/Ks. The phylogenetic trees supported the classification of Eisenia and Lumbricus; however, the trees based on cox1 did not. Through various comparisons, it was determined that cox1 fragments might be more suitable for molecular identification. These results lay the foundation for further phylogenetic studies on Lumbricidae.

1. Introduction

Earthworms are one of the most dominant and widely distributed invertebrates in soils. They can significantly alter their habitats through the formation of soil aggregates by drilling soil and accelerating microbial activities, with profound effects on both belowground and aboveground biota [1,2]. Despite their importance for ecosystems, significant difficulties remain in the identification of earthworms [3]. This is due to the limited number of external features available for identification, as well as the considerable plasticity of these features; thus, species identification often relies on internal structures [1,3,4]. Moreover, since many of the morphological features used for identification exist only in adults, the identification of juveniles is impossible in many species [4,5]. As classification and species identification are the basis of most ecological studies, identification limitations have greatly hindered progress in the ecological and community research on earthworms.
Sequence data are important not only for species identification but also for phylogenetic analysis. Due to the soft bodies of earthworms, the fossil record in this area is sparse [6]; thus, it is difficult to identify their ancestry and evolutionary characteristics, with Lumbricidae being no exception. Although Lumbricidae are one of the most widely studied and distributed groups of earthworms, their taxonomy is far from settled [3]. Because of the lack of useful taxonomic features, many morphologically similar species are classified as a single species with various morphotypes or species complexes that include various taxa of uncertain taxonomic categories [3,7,8]. Consequently, earthworm identification based on mitochondrial genomes (mitogenome) might provide a solution to this issue [9]. The mitogenome is a highly conserved, typically double-stranded, circular molecule that is one of the most widely used tools in taxonomy, population genetics, and evolutionary biology [10,11,12].
For this study, we sequenced 5 new partial mitogenomes from 4 genera of Lumbricidae and compared their 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs) with other Lumbricidae species. Due to the large number of published mitogenomes of the Eisenia genus, we selected two species of the Eisenia genus to clarify its phylogenetic relationships. We aimed to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of Lumbricidae to identify the most suitable gene sequence for species identification.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Taxon Sampling

Specimens of Bimastos parvus (GS1), Dendrobaena octaedra (CBS1), Eisenia andrei (LFWA), Eisenia nordenskioldi (LSFL), and Octolasion tyrtaeum (XZLS) were collected from five different locations in northwestern, northeastern, and northern China (Table 1). Subsequent to morphological identification, the samples were preserved in 95% ethanol [13].

2.2. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from tissue using a FastPure Cell/Tissue DNA Isolation Mini Kit (Vazyme™, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. High-quality gDNAs were then stored at −20 °C for future experiments. The DNA samples were sent to Genepioneer Biotechnologies (Nanjing, China) for library construction and sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq2500 high-throughput sequencing platform [14]. Raw data were filtered to remove joint sequences and low-quality reads to obtain high-quality, clean data.

2.3. Assembly of Mitogenomes

The SPAdes 3.15.3 software was employed to assemble the mitogenomes using the reference NCBI Accession NC_001673.1 for quality control following assembly [15]. The final mitogenome gene annotation results were obtained using BLAST CD-search (available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) and manual correction. Mitogenomic rRNA and tRNA annotation data were obtained using the MITOS Webserver (available at http://mitos.bioinf.unileipzig.de/index.py) [16,17,18].

2.4. Data Analysis

The rate of nonsynonymous substitutions (Ka), rate of synonymous substitutions (Ks), ratio of Ka/Ks, and p-distance were determined using MEGA X for the five earthworm species [19]. Although mitogenome DNA is inherited as a single molecule, phylogenetic inferences based on different portions of the genome may differ. To verify the obtained phylogenies, we constructed several datasets extracted from the mitogenomes:
(a) The concatenated set of base sequences of 13 PCGs from 13 species;
(b) 13 single PCGs from 13 species.
To determine the phylogenetic relationships of Lumbricidae, phylogenetic trees were constructed using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) based on these two types of datasets, respectively. One species (Pontoscolex corethrurus) was considered as an outgroup (Table 2). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the PhyloSuite v1.2.2 [20]. For dataset a), the best fit model of BI was selected by ModelFinder, while the model of ML was determined by automatic partitioning (Table 3). For dataset b), the best fit models of BI for cox1 and cox2 were GTR+F+I+G4, whereas for nd5 and nd3 they were HKY+F+I+G4; meanwhile, the best fit models of ML for cox1 and cox2 were GTR+F+I+G4, whereas for nd5 and nd3 they were HKY+F+I+G4 and TN+F+I+G4, respectively. The BI analyses were performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 and were run for one million generations, with tree sampling being carried out every 1000 generations with a burn-in of 25% trees. The phylogenetic trees were viewed and edited using EvolView (available at https://www.evolgenius.info/) [21].

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Mitogenomes

The partial mitogenome sequences of B. parvus, D. octaedra, E. andrei, E. nordenskioldi, and O. tyrtaeum were linear DNA molecules that were 14,977, 15,152, 15,194, 15,656, and 15,715 bp in length, respectively. Among these earthworms, O. tyrtaeum had the smallest mitogenome (14,977 bp), while D. octaedra had the largest (15,715 bp). A base composition analysis indicated that five mitogenome sequences were biased toward A and T, with an A + T content of 66.57% in B. parvus, 66.91% in D. octaedra, 62.70% in E. andrei, 62.92% in E. nordenskioldi, and 64.75% in O. tyrtaeum. The five mitogenomes were submitted to GenBank (accession numbers: MZ857199, MZ857197, MZ857198, MZ857200, and MZ857201) (Table 2). The mitogenomes of these five species possessed the typical gene composition that has been hypothesized for most earthworms, including 13 PCGs, 22 tRNA genes, and two rRNA genes (12S and 16S) [25,27]. For these five mitogenomes, there was a 417 to 1093 bp repetitive sequence between tRNA-Arg and tRNA-His, which was suspected to be a putative control region (CR) that also appeared in the mitogenomes of other Lumbricidae species [22,23,24].
All of the genes were encoded on a single DNA strand, where different parts of the genome had almost no length variation but a different substitution rate (Figure 1). For the five mitogenomes, the total PCG lengths were 11,080, 11,078, 11,075, 11,077, and 11,075 bp, respectively. The majority of the PCGs of these mitogenomes began with the conventional initiation codon ATG, as seen in other animals, except for cox1, which began with the initiation codon ATT. There were three termination codons in the five mitogenome sequences: TAA, TA-, and T--. For all five mitogenomes, the occurrence frequency of the termination codon TAA was higher than that of the other two termination codons.

3.2. Variation among PCGs

The Ka, Ks, and their ratio (Ka/Ks, sometimes termed dN/dS) are commonly employed to aid in understanding the direction of evolution and its selective strength in a coding sequence [28,29,30]. Ka/Ks > 1 indicates a positive selection, Ka/Ks < 1 indicates a negative selection, and Ka/Ks ≈ 1 indicates a neutral evolution. According to Figure 1, the Ka/Ks values of all the PCGs were less than 0.35, with cox1 having the lowest evolutionary rate. The PCGs of the five assessed species evolved under negative selection (purify selection) as a whole.
From what little data we have so far, cox1 was the most slowly evolving gene, while the short atp8 gene had the highest substitution rate, with p-distance being the lowest and the highest on the nucleotide level, respectively.

3.3. A Mitochondrial Genome Phylogeny of Lumbricidae

Because of the limited mitogenome sequences of Lumbricidae, we included only 12 species from 6 genera of Lumbricidae for the phylogenetic analyses. One earthworm in Glossoscolecidae (P. corethrurus) was selected as an outgroup to root the phylogenetic trees, which was implemented to understand the evolutionary relationships within the Lumbricidae family. According to the phylogenetic trees (Figure 2), all of the species in both Eisenia and Lumbricus were clustered with species of the same genus.
The Bimastos genus was closely related to the Eisenia genus. We also used 13 single PCGs to build trees, where the results of the phylogenetic trees based on cox1, cox2, nd5, and nd3 were roughly similar to those for the phylogenetic tree based on PCGs. The cox1-based phylogenetic tree reflected that the Eisenia species were not completely clustered together, and the cox1-based and nd3-based phylogenetic trees reflected that the Bimastos genus was closely related to the Eisenia genus. Our results revealed that mitogenomic sequences are effective molecular markers for investigating the systematic relationships within Lumbricidae; however, the data covered only six genera, which meant that they were still limited. The sequencing mitogenomes of additional taxa might assist with the further investigation of the ongoing controversial taxonomic issues, while resolving the higher-level phylogeny within Lumbricidae. The accumulation of mitogenomic sequences may provide further evolutionary and phylogenetic clues about Lumbricidae in the future.

4. Discussion

As mentioned above, there is an unknown region between tRNA-Arg and tRNA-His in most published mitogenomes of Lumbricidae species with a length of several hundred bp; thus, we speculated that this region may be a CR. However, since different species and even different individuals of the same species have considerable differences in their CR [26,31,32], we are not yet able to verify this deduction.
According to Figure 1 and Figure 3, the Ka/Ks values and p-distances of cox1, cox2, cox3, cytb, atp6, nd5, and nd3 were relatively stable and the results of the phylogenetic trees based on cox1, cox2, nd5, and nd3 roughly reflected the phylogenetic relationships within the Lumbricidae families. However, considering the suitability of selecting a gene for molecular identification (in addition to reflecting the internal phylogenetic relationships of the Lumbricidae family), the length of sequence fragments should be long enough, and the sequence of published fragments should be plentiful enough [1]. The number of Lumbricidae sequences in GenBank (NCBI, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) is currently many times larger in cox1 than in other PCGs. Therefore, after comprehensive consideration, the cox1 fragment may be more suitable for molecular identification, which is consistent with the findings of other studies [1,33]. The cox2 fragment has the potential to construct DNA barcodes; however, more cox2 gene fragments of the species need to be supplemented.
Our results were limited by the restricted taxonomic sampling and/or the low phylogenetic signal of the chosen genes, consistent with similar studies that revealed systematic instability within the family (e.g., many genera do not form monophyletic assemblages) and emphasized the need for classification reflecting evolutionary relationships [34]. Nevertheless, our results complemented the database of mitochondrial genes in Lumbricidae species and demonstrated that mitogenome sequences are effective molecular markers for the study of systematic relationships within Lumbricidae. However, the data covered only 12 species, and the number of acquisitions of each sample was not vast. Furthermore, we did not explore whether RNA fragments might be used for molecular identification, meaning that they remain limited. Despite there being no evidence of speciation in the nuclear markers, large mitochondrial genetic distances have been observed within several Lumbricidae species [35,36]. However, considering that the rate of variation of the mitochondrial genome sequence is higher than that of the nuclear genome sequence, the detection ability of inter-species differentiation is stronger [37] and there is little difference between the clustering of the mitochondrial genome tree and the clustering of the nuclear genome tree [38]. In this paper, we mainly considered the mitochondrial genome, and the nuclear genome was not considered. We will shift our focus to nuclear genomes in future studies. Sequencing the mitogenomes of additional taxa may help to further investigate current controversial taxonomic problems and resolve the higher-level phylogeny within Lumbricidae. The improvement of these deficiencies will be addressed in future research.

5. Conclusions

In contrast to traditional morphological identification, molecular identification is simple, rapid, and accurate [39,40,41]. In this study, we constructed a total of 30 phylogenetic trees based on two types of datasets to clarify phylogenetic relationships within the Lumbricidae family while finding suitable gene fragments for molecular identification. Meanwhile, the Ka/Ks values of five genomes were calculated and it was found that all the PCGs of these five species were under negative selection. Considering the length of the fragment and the number of published species of the fragment, we found that cox1 was more suitable for molecular identification. Our results support studies that suggest that cox1 is more suitable for molecular identification.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and H.R.; methodology, H.L. and Y.Z.; software, W.X. and H.L.; formal analysis, W.X. and Y.F.; resources, H.L. and Y.Z.; data curation, H.L. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, H.R.; supervision, H.R.; funding acquisition, H.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071594), Honghua Ruan; the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (2019K253), Hongyi Liu; the Nature Science Fund of Hebei Province (C2019408050), Yufeng Zhang.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Nanjing Forestry University (No.2021002).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

DNA sequences: GenBank accession number MZ857199 for Bimastos parvus, MZ857197 for Dendrobaena octaedra, MZ857198 for Eisenia andrei, MZ857200 for Eisenia nordenskioldi, and MZ857201 for Octolasion tyrtaeum.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klarica, J.; Kloss-Brandstätter, A.; Traugott, M.; Juen, A. Comparing four mitochondrial genes in earthworms—Implications for identification, phylogenetics, and discovery of cryptic species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 45, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yonemura, S.; Kaneda, S.; Kodama, N.; Sakurai, G.; Yokozawa, M. Dynamic measurements of earthworm respiration. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2019, 75, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pérez-Losada, M.; Ricoy, M.; Marshall, J.C.; Domínguez, J. Phylogenetic assessment of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa species complex (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2009, 52, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Richard, B.; Decaëns, T.; Rougerie, R.; James, S.W.; Porco, D.; Hebert, P.D.N. Re-Integrating earthworm juveniles into soil biodiversity studies: Species identification through DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gabriella, J.E.; Jan, L.; Claudio, M.D.; Alberto, P.C. Identification of Earthworm Species in Uruguay Based on Morphological and Molecular Methods. Agrociencia 2019, 23, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  6. Piearce, T.G.; Oates, K.; Carruthers, W.J. A fossil earthworm embryo (Oligochaeta) from beneath a Late Bronze Age midden at Potterne, Wiltshire, UK. J. Zool. 1990, 220, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Briones, M.J.I. A taxonomic study of the Allolobophora caliginosa complex (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae): A preliminary study. Can. J. Zool. 1996, 74, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Briones, M.J.I. Two ecotypes in Allolobophora caliginosa (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Acta Oecologica 1993, 14, 317–325. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fang, Y.; Chen, J.; Ruan, H.H.; Xu, N.; Que, Z.T.; Liu, H.Y. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Metaphire vulgaris Based on the Mitochondrial COI Gene and Microsatellites. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 686246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boore, J.L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xu, W.; Ding, J.Y.; Lin, S.P.; Xu, R.F.; Liu, H.Y. Comparative mitogenomes of three species in Moenkhausia: Rare irregular gene rearrangement within Characidae. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xu, W.; Lin, S.P.; Liu, H.Y. Mitochondrial genomes of five Hyphessobrycon tetras and their phylogenetic implications. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 12754–12764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, Q.; Xiao, N.W. Terrestrial Earthworms (Oligochaeta: Opisthopora) of China; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2011. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.K.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Benson, D.A.; Cavanaugh, M.; Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Ostell, J.; Pruitt, K.D.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D41–D47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bernt, M.; Braband, A.; Schierwater, B.; Stadler, P.F. Genetic aspects of mitochondrial genome evolution. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2013, 69, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bernt, M.; Donath, A.; Jühling, F.; Externbrink, F.; Florentz, C.; Fritzsch, G.; Pütz, J.; Middendorf, M.; Stadler, P.F. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2013, 69, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.L.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.K.; Gao, S.H.; Lercher, M.J.; Hu, S.N.; Chen, W.H. EvolView, an online tool for visualizing, annotating and managing phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W569–W572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shekhovtsov, S.V.; Peltek, S.E. The complete mitochondrial genome of Aporrectodea rosea (Annelida: Lumbricidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B-Resour. 2019, 4, 1752–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, Q.Z.; Liu, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.F.; Ruan, H.H. The complete mitochondrial genome of Lumbricus rubellus (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) and its phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part B-Resour. 2019, 4, 2677–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Shekhovtsov, S.V.; Golovanova, E.V.; Ershov, N.I.; Poluboyarova, T.V.; Berman, D.I.; Bulakhova, N.A.; Szederjesi, T.; Peltek, S.E. Phylogeny of the Eisenia nordenskioldi complex based on mitochondrial genomes. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2020, 96, 103137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boore, J.L.; Brown, W.M. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the annelid worm Lumbricus terrestris. Genetics 1995, 141, 305–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Conrado, A.C.; Arruda, H.; Stanton, D.W.G.; James, S.W.; Kille, P.; Brown, G.; Silva, E.; Dupont, L.; Taheri, S.; Morgan, A.J.; et al. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the pantropical earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Rhinodrilidae, Clitellata): Mitogenome characterization and phylogenetic positioning. ZooKeys 2017, 688, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, L.; Sechi, P.; Yuan, M.; Jiang, J.; Dong, Y.; Qiu, J. Fifteen new earthworm mitogenomes shed new light on phylogeny within the Pheretima complex. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Fay, J.C.; Wu, C.I. The neutral theory in the genomic era. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, Z.; Nielsen, R. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Vang, S.; Yu, J.; Wong, G.K.S.; Wang, J. Correlation Between Ka/Ks and Ks is Related to Substitution Model and Evolutionary Lineage. J. Mol. Evol. 2009, 68, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cui, Z.X.; Liu, Y.; Chu, K.H. Broader pattern of tandem repeats in the mitochondrial control region of Perciformes. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2010, 28, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kornienko, I.V.; Vodolazhsky, D.I. Patterns of single nucleotide polymorphism distribution in hypervariable regions of the D-loop of human mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. 2010, 44, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. King, R.A.; Tibble, A.L.; Symondson, W.O. Opening a can of worms: Unprecedented sympatric cryptic diversity within British lumbricide earthworms. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 4684–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Domínguez, J.; Aira, M.; Breinholt, J.W.; Stojanovic, M.; James, S.W.; Pérez-Losada, M. Underground evolution: New roots for the old tree of lumbricid earthworms. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2015, 83, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Martinsson, S.; Erséus, C. Hybridisation and species delimitation of Scandinavian Eisenia spp. (Clitellata: Lumbricidae). Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2018, 88, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martinsson, S.; Erséus, C. Cryptic speciation and limited hybridization within Lumbricus earthworms (Clitellata: Lumbricidae). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2017, 106, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, T.; Al-Farraj, S.A.; Gao, F. Further consideration on the phylogeny of the Ciliophora: Analyses using both mitochondrial and nuclear data with focus on the extremely confused class Phyllopharyngea. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2017, 112, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Katz, L.A.; DeBerardinis, J.; Hall, M.S.; Kovner, A.M.; Dunthorn, M.; Muse, S.V. Heterogeneous Rates of Molecular Evolution Among Cryptic Species of the Ciliate Morphospecies Chilodonella uncinata. J. Mol. Evol. 2011, 73, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, Y.Z.; Han, Q.D.; Fu, L.W.; Wang, Y.X.; Sui, Z.H.; Liu, Y.G. Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of fungal pathogens isolated from diseased fish in Xinjiang, China. J. Fish Biol. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fita, T.; Getu, E.; Wakgari, M.; Woldetsadike, K.; Jones, P.R. Molecular identification of white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae), and its associated natural enemies in western Ethiopia. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Breka, K.; Krizmanić, I.; Vukov, T.; Stamenković, S. A procedure for taxon assessment based on morphological variation in European water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex). Turk. J. Zool. 2020, 44, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pairwise Ka/Ks and p-distance of 13 PCGs between five mitogenomes. The band within the box represents the median; upper and lower hinges correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles; upper and lower whiskers correspond to 1.5 IQR from the upper and lower hinges; dots correspond to outliers.
Figure 1. Pairwise Ka/Ks and p-distance of 13 PCGs between five mitogenomes. The band within the box represents the median; upper and lower hinges correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles; upper and lower whiskers correspond to 1.5 IQR from the upper and lower hinges; dots correspond to outliers.
Diversity 13 00580 g001
Figure 2. Mitogenomic phylogenetic tree of 12 Lumbricidae species and an outgroup (P. corethrurus) based on 13 PCGs using the BI method and ML method. Different colors indicate different genera. Numbers at nodes are statistical support values for BI (posterior probabilities)/ML (bootstrap values).
Figure 2. Mitogenomic phylogenetic tree of 12 Lumbricidae species and an outgroup (P. corethrurus) based on 13 PCGs using the BI method and ML method. Different colors indicate different genera. Numbers at nodes are statistical support values for BI (posterior probabilities)/ML (bootstrap values).
Diversity 13 00580 g002
Figure 3. Mitogenomic phylogenetic trees of 12 Lumbricidae species and an outgroup (P. corethrurus) based on cox1 (A), cox2 (B), nd5 (C), and nd3 (D) using the BI method and ML method. Different colors indicate different genera. Numbers at nodes are statistical support values for BI (posterior probabilities)/ML (bootstrap values). * indicates clades not supported by the ML analysis.
Figure 3. Mitogenomic phylogenetic trees of 12 Lumbricidae species and an outgroup (P. corethrurus) based on cox1 (A), cox2 (B), nd5 (C), and nd3 (D) using the BI method and ML method. Different colors indicate different genera. Numbers at nodes are statistical support values for BI (posterior probabilities)/ML (bootstrap values). * indicates clades not supported by the ML analysis.
Diversity 13 00580 g003
Table 1. Locations of the samples collected.
Table 1. Locations of the samples collected.
SpeciesSample IDCoordination
Bimastos parvusGS139°46′ N, 98°19′ E
Dendrobaena octaedraCBS144°2′ N, 127°55′ E
Eisenia andreiLFWA38°87′ N, 116°47′ E
Eisenia nordenskioldiLSFL47°10′ N, 128°53′ E
Octolasion tyrtaeumXZLS29°46′ N, 91°55′ E
Table 2. Mitogenomes of Lumbricidae and Glossoscolecidae used in phylogenetic analyses.
Table 2. Mitogenomes of Lumbricidae and Glossoscolecidae used in phylogenetic analyses.
FamilySpeciesAccession no.Length (bp)References
LumbricidaeAporrectodea roseaMK573632.115,086[22]
Bimastos parvusMZ85719915,194
Dendrobaena octaedraMZ85719715,715
Eisenia andreiMZ85719815,656
Eisenia balatonicaMK642872.114,589[23]
Eisenia nanaMK618511.114,599[23]
Eisenia nordenskioldiMZ85720015,152
Eisenia spelaeaMK642870.114,738[23]
Eisenia tractaMK642871.114,589[23]
Lumbricus rubellusMN102127.115,464[24]
Lumbricus terrestrisU24570.114,998[25]
Octolasion tyrtaeumMZ85720114,977
GlossoscolecidaePontoscolex corethrurusKT988053.114,835[26]
Table 3. Best fit models for BI and ML analysis on dataset (a).
Table 3. Best fit models for BI and ML analysis on dataset (a).
Modelcox1cox2atp8cox3nd6cytbatp6nd5nd4lnd4nd1nd3nd2
BIGTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
HKY+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
HKY+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
HKY+F+
I+G4
MLTIM2+F+
I+G4
TIM2+F+
I+G4
HKY+F+
I+G4
TIM2+F+
I+G4
HKY+F+
I+G4
TIM2+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
GTR+F+
I+G4
HKY+F+
I+G4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Fang, Y.; Ruan, H. Characterization of Five New Earthworm Mitogenomes (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae): Mitochondrial Phylogeny of Lumbricidae. Diversity 2021, 13, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110580

AMA Style

Liu H, Zhang Y, Xu W, Fang Y, Ruan H. Characterization of Five New Earthworm Mitogenomes (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae): Mitochondrial Phylogeny of Lumbricidae. Diversity. 2021; 13(11):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Hongyi, Yufeng Zhang, Wei Xu, Yu Fang, and Honghua Ruan. 2021. "Characterization of Five New Earthworm Mitogenomes (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae): Mitochondrial Phylogeny of Lumbricidae" Diversity 13, no. 11: 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop